Quantcast
Channel: Movies – Den of Geek
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live

Den of Geek Needs a Los Angeles Based Film Contributor!

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek8/30/2013 at 5:31PM

Do you live in or around Los Angeles? Do you like to write about film? Are you...one of us???

Den of Geek is looking for a Los Angeles based film critic...is it you? This isn't a traditional "film critic" position. We're looking for writers who can balance a strong knowledge of the broader conventions of cinema with a genuine love and encyclopedic knowledge of genre filmmaking including (but certainly not limited to) sci-fi, horror, action, fantasy, superhero, and other under-the-radar and/or bizarre projects that defy classification. 

Strong writing skills are, of course, a requirement, but an understanding and appreciation for the conventions of the genre and the expectations of the target audience are just as important. However, please understand that established and verifiable early access to press screenings and junkets on the West Coast is an absolute must! 

Please send writing samples, including links to published content, to: denofgeeksubmit@gmail.com

The Giant Spider Invasion’s Spider Stolen!

$
0
0
NewsJim Knipfel9/1/2013 at 12:14AM

Heinous fiends steal a classic low-budget prop and sell it for scrap; police now on the lookout for a couple morons with a flatbed

First a bit of background. The Giant Spider Invasion (1975) may not have been Lawrence of Arabia, or even Earth vs. The Spider, but it meant a lot to me. A much more complicated film than the title might imply, Bill Rebane’s hugely entertaining sci-fi monster picture featured a number of intertwining plot lines and character trajectories, a good dose of self-aware comedy, some crazy science involving black holes, a couple name actors (Alan Hale, Jr.) and, yes, giant spiders. Giant spiders that ATE people! What the hell more could you want as a kid? It was a film of explosive wonderment and simple damned weirdness.

The Giant Spider Invasion was a film Rebane approached with a great deal of ambition but very little money. When it came to special effects, in particular those titular giant spiders themselves, some improvisation was necessary. What his effects crew came up with was a spider body shell that fit neatly over a VW Beetle. Emerging from the shell were eight giant legs that moved vaguely like a spider’s while resembling enormous pipe cleaners. To younger audiences who’ve grown accustomed to slick and soulless CGI perfection it may look comical, but dammit he did what he needed to do to get that spider onscreen, and it’s an effect that’s gone on to become legendary in the annals of independent filmmaking. Anyone with some makeup or fishing line can throw a zombie or some ghost nonsense on the screen easy as pie, but it’s a rare and gutsy filmmaker who can deliver an actual, physical giant spider, even if its legs did look like pipe cleaners.

In the years following the completion of the film, Rebane stored the giant spider prop in a warehouse in Lincoln County, Wisconsin. At some point in the last few weeks, Rebane discovered recently, the giant spider had been stolen. He immediately reported the heist to the Lincoln County Sheriff's Department, who opened an investigation. Making the theft much trickier than stealing, say, one of Dirty Harry’s guns or an original Star Wars X-Wing fighter is that still attached to the VW chassis as it is, there’s no way to move the spider except with a flatbed truck. Rebane did tell police that in fact the last time the spider was spotted it was indeed on a flatbed truck near Merill, Wisconsin.

Even more tragic are later reports that several weeks ago parts of the spider’s skeletal framework had been sold as scrap metal to Schultz Recycling in Merrill. Given the ongoing police investigation, the identity of who sold the spider to Schultz could not be revealed, nor could any specific dates of the theft or the sale.

So what kind of heinous fiend, what kind of absolute moron would do such a thing? Drunks? Lotta those in Wisconsin. The hopped-up and drug-addled? Bored teenagers out on a hoot with a flatbed truck? And then why sell it as scrap? Granted, scrap metal’s bringing in solid cash these days, but there are easier ways to go about it. This wasn’t stealing screen doors, for godsakes, this was a fucking GIANT SPIDER! Maybe they sobered up later, realized what they had on their hands, realized they probably shouldn’t have it on their hands, and tried to get rid of the evidence by chopping it up and bringing it to the scrapyard, which is a bit like burning up a stolen Monet in an oven after learning the cops were on your trail. It just goes to show yet again that in spite of everything the movies try to tell us, most criminals are plain dumb as rocks.

To most filmgoers, as props go The Giant Spider Invasion’s spider isn’t exactly on a par with, say, Citizen Kane’s Rosebud or an original Maltese Falcon. To some of us, however, it was a symbol of cult film gumption, of an era of low-budget moviemaking long gone, of a time when truly indie films like this could still get distributed and shown in major theaters without studio backing. Most important of all, it was a reminder of a time when we were still willing and able to suspend disbelief. 

And for that, if they ever do catch the responsible fiend, I hope they hang him.

Anyone with any information regarding the giant spider heist is asked to please contact the Lincoln County Crimestoppers at (715) 536-6272.

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

 

HBO to Bring Westworld to TV from J.J. Abrams and Jonathan Nolan

$
0
0
NewsMike Cecchini9/1/2013 at 10:33AM

The cult classic 1973 film, Westworld, which starred Yul Brynner and James Brolin, has a pilot order from HBO.

Westworld, the 1973 cult classic about an amusement park populated by life-like robots that allowed vacationers to live out their every fantasy, is on the fast-track to become an HBO series courtesy of J.J. Abrams and Bad Robot. Yul Brynner was the "bad robot" of the original film, which dealt with what happens when the robotic inhabitants started acting on their own...and targeting the resort's human visitors. The memorable trailer for the film (which we've embedded below) described Westworld as the place "where nothing can go wrong...go wrong...go wrong..."

The pilot will be co-written by Jonathan Nolan and Lisa Joy, who will also produce along with J.J. Abrams, Bryan Burk, and Jerry Weintraub of Bad Robot. HBO describes Westworld as “a dark odyssey about the dawn of artificial consciousness and the future of sin.” I guess this means we'll be seeing more of the realistic robot hookers from the 1973 flick. Considering the "adult themes" present in Westworld (which sprung from the mind of none other than Michael Crichton), there's plenty of opportunity for cable TV ultra-violence and gratuitous nudity.

We can't wait.
 


Source: Variety.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Martin Scorsese Mick Jagger Project Moves to HBO

$
0
0
NewsTony Sokol9/1/2013 at 3:49PM

Martin Scorsese and Mick Jagger are bringing a music series to HBO.

 

This one’s got it all for me. A Rolling Stone. My favorite living director. HBO. Bobby Cannavale. Terence Winter. They’ve been working on it for three years. A Martin Scorsese Mick Jagger rock and roll television project snagged Bobby Cannavale for the lead and found a team to run it. They’re just waiting for HBO to greenlight the project.

 The Martin Scorsese Mick Jagger collaboration is set in the last days of disco, the birth of rap and the rise of punk, well the fall of punk if you’re an absolute purist, 1977 . Bobby Cannavale will play Richie Finestra, a New York record producer at a major label looking for new talent.

They would have gotten to it sooner but Mick was off in the never-ending Rolling Stones tour. According to published reports Mick Jagger told Martin Scorsese they should set Casino in the music industry. Can’t wait for the first eye-popping scene.

Now that Bobby Cannavale is on board, the series is gaining momentum. Martin Scorsese is on board to direct the first episode of the as-yet-untitled project from a pilot script from Terence Winter. The series will be run by A&R man Brian Koppelman, who discovered Tracy Chapman, and David Levien, who wrote Oceans 13, Players and the upcoming movie Runner Runner which will star Ben Affleck and Justin Timberlake. They intend to start shooting early next year.

Martin Scorsese, Mick Jagger, Koppelman and HBO worked together on the Rolling Stones documentary Shine A Light.

 

SOURCE: DEADLINE

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Fifty Shades of Grey Casts Dakota Johnson and Charles Hunnan as Leads

$
0
0
NewsTony Sokol9/2/2013 at 1:28PM

Fifty Shades of Grey movie officially casts Dakota Johnson as Anastasia Steele, Charlie Hunnam as Christian Grey.

I don’t know how painful a decision it was, but after months of Fifty Shades of Grey movie cast rumors, I was just waiting for a safe word. The producers of the Fifty Shades of Grey movie cast Dakota Johnson, the daughter of Don Johnson and Melanie Griffith, in the role of Anastasia Steele. Charlie Hunnam from Sons of Anarchy will wield the whip as Christian Grey in Fifty Shades of Grey. Hunnam more recently starred in Pacific Rim, which was directed by Guillermo Del Toro.

Dakota Johnson is best known for her sex scene with Justin Timberlake in The Social Network. Before she started acting, the first official Fifty Shades of Grey cast member, Dakota Johnson, was a model at IMG. Dakota Johnson is currently shooting a modern-day re-telling of Shakespeare’s “Cymbeline.”

E.L. James The “Fifty Shades of Grey” author took to Twitter to spring the news this morning, she tweeted “I am delighted to let you know that the lovely Dakota Johnson has agreed to be our Anastasia in the film adaptation of Fifty Shades of Grey.”

Fifty Shades of Grey will be directed by Sam Taylor-Johnson, who helmed Nowhere Boy. The screenplay for the movie adaptation of Fifty Shades of Grey was written by Kelly Marcel, who wrote Saving Mr. Banks.

Focus will release Fifty Shades of Grey on Aug. 1, 2014.

 

SOURCE: VARIETY

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Disqus - noscript

zomg

Riddick, Review

$
0
0
ReviewRyan Lambie9/3/2013 at 8:40AM

Vin Diesel returns as the gruff anti-hero in the action sequel, Riddick. The results, Ryan writes, are a bit of a muddle...

With Pitch Black having established Vin Diesel's Riddick as a lethal science fiction anti-hero, director David Twohy gave the character a grand adventure of his own in The Chronicles Of Riddick. With that movie's disappointing theatrical take severely dampening chances of an equally lavish sequel, Twohy's come up with Riddick, a more economical side-story that aims to get back to the focused man-versus-monsters premise that made Pitch Black a sleeper hit.

The movie opens with Riddick having what he generously describes as "a legendary bad day". Double-crossed by the Necromongers - the cult-like warrior race from the previous movie - he's left for dead on a godforsaken desert planet full of various slithering, toothsome monsters. Feasting on alien eel meat and befriending a dog-type-thing dubbed a 'dingo-jingo', Riddick forges a passable existence on this lonely rock - until two factions of bounty hunters show up, both intent on capturing Riddick either dead or alive.

A cat-and-mouse pursuit ensues between Riddick - who proves himself to be every bit the deadly man hunter he was said to be in earlier films - and the bickering mercenaries, one faction led by the shrewd Boss Johns (Matthew Nable) the other headed by the incompetent, scenery-chewing Santana (Jordi Molla). But then the story shifts gear, as an incoming storm brings with it a new threat: a deadly breed of semi-aquatic, flesh-eating monsters.

This brief synopsis makes Riddick sounds like a movie patterned after the lean, entertaining Pitch Black - something also borne out by its marketing - but it isn't. Where Pitch Black was well paced, with its simple scenario of a crash landing, survivors and a planet full of lethal flying monsters, Riddick meanders and makes odd digressions. In fact, its camp dialogue, uneven special effects and quarry-like setting make the movie feel uncannily like a monster-filled retread of John Carpenter's ill-fated Ghosts Of Mars - one line from that 2001 movie even appears to sum up Riddick's premise.

The story passes through three distinct phases, none of which gel into a coherent whole. The first is an almost silent survival adventure, a kind of terse Robinson Crusoe On Mars. The second's more like a sci-fi western, where various hired gunslingers scratch about in the dust looking for their mark (oddly, Vin Diesel disappears for much of this part of the movie). Finally, the third story takes its place, which is the monsters-attack flick the trailers hinted at.

While there's nothing wrong with unusual story structures, and certainly nothing wrong with confounding audience expectations, Riddick isn't so much narratively daring as it is rudderless. There are entire scenes in Riddick that don’t mean anything. Characters make threats and counter-threats, make deals and forge new alliances, but no one does or says anything to really get the plot moving. And by the time a credible threat is finally established, it's far, far too late.

There are nods and flashbacks and verbal references to the previous films, which may earn a smile of approval for returning fans, but most of them do little more than slow the sense of pace down even further - I was surprised to learn that Riddick's running time only exceeds Pitch Black's by eight minutes, since the former feels much longer.

Vin Diesel's his reliably gruff, physically imposing self as Riddick, and there's at least the sense that he's enjoying his latest outing. But it's disappointing to see Battlestar Galactica's Katee Sackhoff given so little to do as a tough sniper named Dahl, and there's a gratuitous, slightly unseemly air to the way she and other women are treated by both a leering camera and the script.

There are moments where the movie shows a flicker of life: some of the wilfully bad dialogue, for example, is quite funny (“I love your toenails. They match your nipples”, “Where did you get that theory from? A unicorn’s ass?”). There’s one strikingly violent death scene that had the audience tittering (anyone disappointed by The Chronicles Of Riddick's PG-13 certificate may be relieved to note that Riddick earns its R-rating), and some of the monsters look appropriately drooling and vicious - though they aren't, it has to be said, quite as threatening as the bat-like critters Patrick Tatopoulos created for the first movie.

Otherwise, Riddick falls between two very different stools. It's not as tense or well told as Pitch Black, and it can't afford to be as lavish and weirdly baroque as The Chronicles Of Riddick. Instead, Riddick feels like an awkwardly constructed amalgam of both - a muddled, choppily edited B-movie that stumbles blindly towards a muted conclusion.

Disqus - noscript

And here I was, hoping that it would be an Oscar contender...

First Official Clip From Terry Gilliam's Zero Theorem

$
0
0
NewsMike Cecchini9/3/2013 at 9:39AM

There's plenty of urban futuristic insanity on display in the first clip from Terry Gilliam's Zero Theory, starring Christoph Waltz!

It's been awhile since we've gotten a proper dose of Terry Gilliam weirdness (2009's The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, to be exact), so it's safe to say that we're about due. Enter Zero Theorem, which stars Christoph Waltz as Qohen Leth, a computer hacker working on a way to determine whether or not life has meaning.

Yes, that sounds right up Mr. Gilliam's alley, doesn't it?

The clip itself is good fun, with some light physical comedy from Waltz (who looks to be channeling Christopher Lloyd a little bit), while the cyberpunk cityscape owes more to Warren Ellis and Darick Robertson's celebrated Transmetropolitancomic than it does to Blade Runner. With all of the weirdness going on in this clip (ahem...Batman!), it's probably worth watching a few times...which is exactly what we'll be doing for the rest of the day.

Zero Theorem opens on December 20, 2013. Now, if only there was some word on that animated project that Mr. Gilliam was circling awhile back...

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Ultimate Showdown DVD Dated

$
0
0
NewsRobert Bernstein9/3/2013 at 10:43AM

The Turtles just wrapped up their first season at Nickelodeon, and the Season 1 DVD will be hitting stores in October...

The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles show just wrapped up its first season at Nickelodeon, and it appears that this awesome new iteration of the turtles is here to stay.  Nickelodeon has announced the third DVD, titled Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Ultimate Showdown, which will be available on October 1, 2013.

The DVD will conclude the first season's episodes, and will include "I, Monster", "The Alien Agenda", "The Pulverizer", "TCRI", "Cockroach Terminator", "Baxter's Gambit", "Enemy of My Enemy", "Karai's Vendetta", "The Pulverizer Retruns!", "Parasitica", "Operation: Break Out", and the Season 1 Finale "Showdown" (which has two parts).

The DVD will run 312 minutes, and will be available for $19.99.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


Arnold and Sly on Expendables 3 Set

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/3/2013 at 3:37PM

Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sylvester Stallone Join Forces for On Set Expendables 3 Picture of 1980s Machismo.

Time cools all things, even 1980s action icon rivalries. Take for example that in the last few years, following Arnold Schwarzenegger leaving the office of governor for the state of California, the two men best associated for playing The Terminator and John Rambo are now the action genre’s odd couple. Two Expendables cameos and this October’s The Escape Plan is already more than the most diehard anti-Die Hards could have dreamed of 25 years ago. But thanks to Schwarzenegger’s Instagram account, we now have more footage of them together on the set of The Expendables 3!
 
This follows the governator releasing a picture last Friday of himself and Indiana Jones star Harrison Ford with director Patrick Hughes. Yet, nobody looks more comfortable in the Expendables world than Sly himself: the man who remarkably built a new franchise for his brand after turning 60.
 
So are we happy to see the stars together again? Are you hoping for just a straight up Odd Couple remake for their next outing?
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Jared Harris Joins The Man From U.N.C.L.E.

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/3/2013 at 3:58PM

Jared Harris to join his Sherlock Holmes director Guy Ritchie for 1960s espionage thriller The Man From U.N.C.L.E. with Henry Cavill and Armie Hammer.

Director Guy Ritchie commences his mission to shoot an adaptation of The Man From U.N.C.L.E. for Warner Brothers next week, however he still had to enlist one reliable point man to join the team. According to a press release, Mad Men’s Jared Harris, who previously worked with the stylish filmmaker on 2011’s Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows where he played Professor Moriarty, has now been cast in the new project.
 
Set against the backdrop of the Cold War during the 1960s, The Man From U.N.C.L.E. focuses on a pair of CIA and KGB agents who must ignore past transgressions in order to team-up and stop an insidious international organization with shadowy motives that involve the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
 
Written by Ritchie and Lionel Wigram, the project stars Henry Cavill (Man of Steel) as the CIA agent and Armie Hammer (The Lone Ranger) as the KGB operative.
 
The project is poised to film in Great Britain and Italy.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

New Carrie Featurette and Stills With Stars

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/3/2013 at 4:37PM

Stars Chloe Grace Moretz and Julianne Moore, as well as director Kimberly Peirce, discuss the Carrie remake's new take on the material with new stills from the film.

Two of the most enchanting and terrifying events in a young person’s life are Halloween and Prom. Well, this October Screen Gems and MGM have decided the two shall meet in the fall’s biggest profile horror film, Carrie.
 
Honestly, remaking one of the all time great horror films feels like a huge challenge, one that even author Stephen King has acknowledged. Yet, it appears director Kimberly Peirce is ready to attempt that challenge with stars Chloe Grace Moretz and Julianne Moore.
 
In a new featurette, and a batch of screenshots released by Dread Central, which you can see below, the director and her two leading ladies discuss how this film seeks to bend the mind from to the emotionally horrific by setting us in Carrie’s shoes.
 

 

It remains unclear whether such an approach con top the vivid nightmare dreamed up for the screen by Brian De Palma with Sissy Spacek, but it is sure to leave at least some teens screaming for the exits. Good luck with that.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Trailer for Scarlett Johansson’s Under the Skin

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/3/2013 at 5:01PM

New trailer for alien invasion movie starring Scarlett Johansson as the alien. Yep, all the better to lure men to her lips.

Scarlett Johansson’s new character in Under the Skin has a special kind of pull over men. She travels the backwoods and American highways through the most remote countryside searching for a man. One that she can eat without notice.
 
Yes, in her newest film, which premiered earlier this year at the Venice Film Festival, Johansson plays an alien who has traveled to Earth in order to take on the appearance of an ideal human specimen, which is all the better to lure victims to their death for. However, she soon discovers from her unique perspective an appreciation for Earth’s dominant species. This epiphany puts her in direct conflict with her alien brethren who are also coming to the third rock from the sun.
 
The film, directed by Jonathan Glazer and based on a book by Michel Faber, offers a unique perspective to the “alien walks among us” thing, as well as the premise of a demon lover or succubus using sexuality to entice her meal. Plus, you always knew there was something a little TOO alluring about Ms. Johansson. Suddenly, it all makes sense!
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Disqus - noscript

the things I would do to this woman...

New Featurette for 12 Years A Slave

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/3/2013 at 5:37PM

New featurette for 12 Years A Slave features Steve McQueen and Chiwetel Ejiofor sitting down to discuss the new biopic about the harrowing journey of Solomon Northup. With Michael Fassbender, Paul Giamatti, Paul Dano, Benedict Cumberbatch, Sarah Paulson and Michael Kenneth Williams, as well.

The newest featurette for Steve McQueen’s 12 Years A Slave offers the chance to hear from the acclaimed filmmaker of Shame, as well as star Chiwetel Ejiofor, discuss the film which tells of the odyssey of Solomon Northup.
 
 
Based on a true story, 12 Years a Slave is to chronicle the harrowing life of Solomon Northup (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a free black man in Upstate New York who is abducted and sold in chains to a malevolent owner (Michael Fassbender). The movie will tell of his 12-year struggle for freedom and dignity, as well as the surprise encounter of a Canadian abolitionist played by Brad Pitt.
 
The film’s cast also includes Benedict Cumberbatch, Paul Dano, Paul Giamatti, Garrett Dillahunt, Sarah Paulson and Michael Kenneth Williams.
 
12 Years A Slave has its official U.S. release date on October 18.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Transformers 4 Gets a Poster and a Title That Screams Dinobots!

$
0
0
NewsMike Cecchini9/3/2013 at 7:59PM

Transformers 4 has its first poster, and a title that makes it pretty clear how Dinobot focused this movie might be!

Transformers 4 has an official title and a teaser poster. Dinobot fans, rejoice! The official title is Transformers: Age of Extinction! And what, as any school boy could tell you, is extinct? Dinosaurs of course. Which leads everyone to the obvious conclusion (and the prospect which has been driving fans absolutely insane) about the presence of Dinobots in the movie.

There's obviously something to this, as producer, Lorenzo di Bonaventura told the Beijing News(with a translation courtesy of Coming Soon) in no uncertain terms that "you can be sure that the joining of the Dinobots will give the audience new excitement...you will feast your eyes and be shocked by them." In the meantime "feast your eyes and be shocked by" the first official poster for Transformers: Age of Extinction!



Transformers: Age of Extinction stars Mark Wahlberg, Stanley Tucci, Kelsey Grammer, Sophia Myles, and Li Binbing. It roars into theaters on June 27th, 2014.


Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


10 Movies That Will Make You Want to Wash Your Hands

$
0
0
Top 10Ethan Lewis9/4/2013 at 7:55AM

With Outbreak coming to NBC and 12 Monkeys on its way to SyFy, it looks like a new epidemic will be infecting TV.

Epidemics and disease have long been the stuff of nightmares. Germs, viruses, epidemics, and plagues find their way into our apocalyptic films. They have shaped human history from leprosy to HIV. It isn’t terribly surprising that disease finds its way into our horror and science fiction films. Especially in an age where Western civilization has tricked itself into believing it is safe from plague. But the truth is, the newest disease is likely just around the corner. So grab your antibacterial wipes (though really, you’re just making those bastards stronger), your face mask and let’s dive into some plague films.

10. The Happening (2008)
What the disease is: Unnamed plant-based disease.
What the disease does: It causes people to commit suicide.
Is it real? No. Unless this film is talking about hay-fever.

The bees are disappearing so the plants have decided to…take revenge? Even though we never really find out exactly why the bees are disappearing. And how exactly have the plants decided to wipe out humanity? By making people commit suicide in absurd and violent manners. Coming from the Mother Nature that brought us leprosy, Ebola, and syphilis this just seems like laziness. 

This film came out at a time when people were very concerned about the disappearance of the bees. In fact, some people were experiencing bee hysteria. And although scientists are still very concerned about colony collapse disorder, we know more about it. This film also emerged two years after the release of An Inconvenient Truth when environmentalism (though mostly of the symbolic green washed variety). And this is a film that tries far too hard to warn us about Mother Nature’s wrath. It makes the list simply because of its unique plant-based plague qualities.
9. Night of the Living Dead (1968)
What the disease is: Unnamed.
What the disease does: Brings the dead back to life to feast on the flesh of the living.
Is it real? NO. And it never will be, dammit!

This was the film that kick started the zombie-plague apocalypse genre. There is something terrifying about this slow moving, human flesh devouring creatures that has found its way into our cultural imaginations. And they are a terrifying and personal form of plague. Either you die (through any means) and end up a zombie or the zombie virus is passed to you via a bite.

In many ways, zombies represent our modern fear of disease. Zombie based plagues are terrifying because we are so susceptible. Your loved ones become nothing more than carriers of disease and you are forced to go into hiding from other humans. And even then you may not be safe.

But is the zombie plague, as represented in Night of the Living Dead, realistic? There is a Crackedarticle regarding why a zombie plague wouldn’t spread terribly far. First of all, we are talking about dead bodies. They are in the process of bloating and rotting. They have no ability to heal even a slightly torn muscle. And the ones in Night of the Living Dead have their intestines hanging out. They’re probably not going to last long and will likely just stink up the neighborhood.

 

8. The Crazies (1973)
What the disease is: Trixie.
What the disease does: Kills outright or causes homicidal madness.
Is it real? No.

This film focuses on a government-created biological weapon that accidentally crash lands in a small town’s water supply. Oh, and the weapon hasn’t been tested so the government can’t really be sure what is going to happen. It contaminates the entire town causing some people to go into homicidal rages. And yet it is the government’s response that is the most horrifying part of the film. They immediately attempt to cover the story up and quarantine the entire town. When their attempts to stop the spread begin to fail they start casually discussing nuking the entire town. Who is the enemy? The people who are sick or the government that created the illness?

In terms of realism, this film does hit on some scary possibilities. The idea of quarantine is terrifying to most people but one would definitely be in place if something like this occurred. Then there is also the idea that the government would nuke a small town in order to stop the spread of an illness. Would they? Maybe. It would be difficult to speculate on that but we sure hope it doesn’t come to that.

 

7. 28 Days Later (2002)
What the disease is: Rage Virus
What the disease does: Causes people to attack one another, spreading the virus via bites
Is it real? No.

The Rage virus acts very similar to an incredibly fast-acting form of rabies. It is spread through saliva and other bodily fluids and causes the victim to become incredibly aggressive. When the victim attacks another person the virus continues to spread. Unlike rabies, however, fast-acting means less than twenty seconds. This makes the spread incredibly rapid and terrifying. And, similar to a zombie outbreak, the virus has the ability to change the character of the people you love, turning them into the enemy.

But could it be possible? One of the things about 28 Days Later that makes it spread so quickly is that it is on an island. This seclusion makes it possible that something like this could spread rapidly. However, these people are clearly ill and acting in an erratic manner. It would be very difficult for the Rage Virus to spread via planes or ships simply because of the quickness of infection. Who would allow such a person onto a plane? If the disease spread quickly enough the plane would quickly crash straight into the Atlantic Ocean. However, if this took place in a landlocked country it could probably spread pretty far before it was stopped.

 

6. Right at Your Door (2006)
What the disease is: Unknown virus.
What the disease does: Affects the respiratory system.
Is it real? Unknown.

Unlike the other films that fester on our list, Right at Your Door features disease as an act of terrorism. The virus featured in this film is released over Los Angeles via a dirty bomb. We have limited information about the virus because the film is told from the singular perspective of a man who was home at the time of the explosion. The information we do receive is from radio broadcasts and sick wife who is trapped outside of their home.

This film borrows a great deal of its plot devices from post-9/11 paranoia. The idea of taping up windows and doors with plastic was popularized in post-9/11 conversations about dirty bombs and other forms of biological terrorism. This film also does a fantastic job of highlighting the dehumanization of disease victims. Of course the film features a great twist of fate revealing that our paranoia may be doing us far more harm than good.

5. Blindness (2008)

What the disease is: Unknown.
What the disease does: Causes the victim to become blind.
Is it real? Blindness exists, but not in this contagious form.

Blindness follows an unknown contagious disease that causes people to go blind. Victims see nothing but a white light. As the disease spreads around the world, it becomes more and more debilitating. People are quarantined under horrendous prison-like conditions. Under these conditions kindness, hygiene and order disappears. Eventually the disease diminishes and the blind are able to see.

While it is realistic in the sense that epidemic blindness would cause a great deal of chaos, it is hard to assess beyond that. The film is done in such a way that it (brilliantly) creates confusion about the passage of time. However, as many blind advocacy groups point out, people don’t lose their humanity when they lose their sight. Would things be more difficult? Absolutely. But would people eventually adapt and create new lives for themselves? Yes. People with visual impairments are often able to adapt and live out normal lives.

4. Children of Men (2006)
What the disease is: Unknown
What the disease does: Causes infertility in humans
Is it real? Infertility exists but not to such a wide scale.

Children of Men imagines, perhaps, one of the most horrific plagues in film. No one is maimed, the dead don’t rise to attack the living, and we aren’t left with a band of clever survivors. Instead, it is a slow march towards annihilation. The world has become infertile and the playgrounds slowly turn silent. And children represent hope. They are the reason people want to make the world a better place. We want to pass down our culture, our wisdom, and our values. And without the ability to reproduce, humans are slowly dying off. The world is thrown into despair and civilizations crumble.

Children of Men is realistic in its consequences. If the world were to suddenly become infertile the government would have to start dealing with nations that have no hope. The effects of widespread despair could be devastating. And of course, as more and more people die, the effects would only continue to escalate. The idea of government sponsored suicide medications, inhumane immigration policies, and strict government control don’t seem to be a huge leap. But, of course, most of our current conversations aren’t concerned with under-population but overpopulation. Environmentalists are concerned about running out of resources on Earth to sustain all of the people living here. However, recent conversations looking at European and Eastern Asian nations have begun to focus their attention on raising their populations…

3. The Stand (1994)

What the disease is: Captain Tripps, an influenza virus
What the disease does: Kills over 99% of the population
Is it real? No.

The Stand follows a super-flu as it wipes out nearly 99% of the population in the United States. This highly contagious deadly form of the flu is nicknamed Captain Tripps and was accidentally released from a military compound. Captain Tripps ravages most of society and causes an apocalypse of Biblical proportions.

Is it realistic? Well, some of the more supernatural elements of the story aren’t based in science. But influenza certainly has a deadly reputation. We need only look back to the Spanish Flu of 1918 to see how high of a death toll influenza can have. A quarter of the United States population came down with the flu. Millions of people died and young adults were particularly susceptible. According to Stanford University, the Spanish Flu killed more people in a year that the Bubonic Plague did. Another very realistic aspect of this film is the diversity of the survivors. Survivors of the plague come from all ages, backgrounds, areas of the country. Some are good, some are bad, and most are somewhere in between. So could a devastating influenza strain kill 99% of the population? Unlikely. But could it more than disrupt society? Absolutely. So…go wash your hands. Right now.

2. Outbreak (1995)
What the disease is: Matoba Virus
What the disease does: Causes fever, bleeding, and death
Is it real? The Matoba Virus is based on the very real Ebola Virus.

Unlike many of the diseases on our list, this one is terrifying because it IS realistic. Many things about Outbreak are based on the Ebola Virus; the Ebola Virus is another viral hemorrhagic fever. However, unlike the Ebola Virus, Matoba eventually mutates and starts spreading in a manner similar to the flu. But with all of the deadly consequences. And it is spread to the United States via the illegal transportation of a monkey. The monkey ends up biting a pet shop owner starting the spread and eventual mutation.

Is it realistic? Absolutely. But don’t let the Ebola Virus let you lose sleep. When outbreaks occur (which they do occasionally in Zaire, The Republic of Congo, and Gabon) they tend to infect around 50-100 people. According to the CDC it is usually spread between close family members or friends who care for the sick victim. Or it is spread in hospital settings where gloves, masks, and other forms of sanitation aren’t available.

1. Contagion (2011)
What the disease is: Meningoencephalitis Virus One (MEV-1)
What the disease does: Attacks the central nervous system
Is it real? No.

MEV-1 is a highly contagious virus that passes from person to person via contact or contact with an item the sick person has touched. The film watches the epidemic spread around the world while governments scramble to come up with a cause and a solution. Meanwhile, society begins to fall apart and vultures show up to prey on the desperate.

As we have seen, most films of this genre rely a great deal on junk science, special effects, and a suspense of disbelief. Not Contagion. The CDC has said the film, while not perfect, is highly accurate. Its contagious nature and its leap from animals to people is realistic. It is also realistic that such a disease could easily pass between countries because of air travel. However, there are flaws in the film just as any other. But when the CDC nods in approval you may want to just be careful.

 

 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

I feel dirty just reading


When Hollyoaks actors do horror

$
0
0
NewsJames Stansfield9/4/2013 at 8:20AM

There's long been a hidden link between Hollyoaks and horror. Here are 10 actors who've made the jump from soap to gore...

NB: This article contains spoilers.

There’s a moment in one of comedian Simon Amstell’s stand up shows where he recounts a conversation he once had with the executive producer of Channel 4 soap opera Hollyoaks. Trading on the commonly held opinion that Hollyoaks is “garbage”, Amstell enquired as to why the producer didn’t try to make it better. The answer came that they did make it better, but people stopped watching.

Even by the not-so-great standards that soaps are measured, Hollyoaks has always been firmly towards the bottom of the ladder. The fictional Chester suburb where the majority of inhabitants are extraordinarily good looking but also extraordinarily stupid has been identified by its often wildly outlandish storylines and impossibly pretty people.

Hollyoaks has been on the air for almost 20 years now, and as with any soap, it’s had a sizeable cast move in and out of it during that time. Unlike other soaps though, Hollyoaks' primary cast has been predominantly made up of younger actors. It might not be too much of a surprise, then, that a number of them have found their way into the horror genre since leaving the show. It’s not unfair to say that horror movies have a tendency to fill their casts with actors that are easy on the eye. Hollyoaks is almost like a breeding ground.

Most recently, former ‘Oaks star Wendy Glen has been seen in the very well received You’re Next, but for others, the foray into the genre of scares and gore has proved to be something of a mixed venture...

Gemma Atkinson

On Hollyoaks: wallflower turned wild thing Lisa Hunter.

In Horror: Emily in 13 Hrs, amongst others.

Gemma Atkinson has been carving herself out a rather nice career in horror movies of late. She’s the lead in the upcoming Night Of The Living 3D Dead. Her latest movie, the Renny Harlin directed The Dyatlov Pass Incident, recently played at FrightFest, and she featured alongside Mark Hamill in flight terror Airbourne. Unfortunately for Gemma, she’s yet to appear in anything that’s actually been any good, including her horror debut 13 Hrs.

Jonathan Glendening’s werewolf-in-a-remote-country-house movie is a very by the numbers offering, in which Atkinson stars as the promiscuous best friend of the heroine alongside Draco Malfoy and that guy who played the son in My Family. They’re chased around dark corridors and ripped to pieces by something that’s largely unseen and has the vision of a person holding a red filter over a lens. The movie does have some nice gore make up effects at times.

Gemma seems to be playing to type, trading on her lad’s mag image, but she looks the part of a horror movie victim at least, and it’s not her fault that the script could have used a little more attention. It’s a shame that her character goes out by blowing her head off with a shotgun.

Ali Bastian

On Hollyoaks: bad teacher Becca Dean

In Horror: Dani in Strippers Vs Werewolves

Ali Bastian had an eventful run on Hollyoaks from 2001 to 2007 which saw her go from naïve undergraduate at the prestigious Hollyoaks Community College to getting pregnant by one of her students, and ended with her being stabbed in prison. After a stint on The Bill, Bastian made her way to Lock Stock-style face-off horror, Strippers Vs Werewolves.

In a movie from the same school as the ill-conceived Lesbian Vampire Hunters, Bastian is one of the SVsW’s few redeeming features. Dani is the kind-hearted stripper, who only wants a cute relationship with her strip club’s nice doorman. Unfortunately, their first date gets off to a rather bad start when she arrives at his home to find his head’s been detached from his body by a pack of revenge hungry lycanthropes.

Ali gets a couple of the movie's very few funny lines and comes out of the whole thing in a better light than most of her co-stars. That said, no one looks very comfortable, especially when having to engage in a scene where the strippers perform a routine for their hairy enemies dressed as Red Riding Hood.

Strippers Vs Werewolves is the second movie this piece has included from Jonathan Glendening, a director who really seems to have a thing for werewolves and ladies from Hollyoaks.

Loui Batley

On Hollyoaks: Olympic swimming hopeful Sarah Barnes

In Horror: Amy in Tower Block

Loui Batley’s exit from her Sarah Barnes character in Hollyoaks could well have fitted nicely into a Single White Female-type horror. Having enraged her lover Lydia, she became the victim of a sabotaged parachute meant for her friend Zoe and plummeted to her doom.

Her exit during Tower Block isn’t nearly as dramatic, being one of the first victims picked off by the angry sniper who targets a floor of high rise residents in the British thriller. Tower Block had a good mix of characters and an excellent cast to play them but was marred by high school play-type conversation, and an unsatisfying and well-telegraphed resolution. A shame, really, as it’s a movie with some good ingredients.

Max Brown

On Hollyoaks: “heartthrob student” Kristian Hargreaves

In Horror: Liam in Turistas - also known as Paradise Lost

If some of the women from Hollyoaks haven’t had too much luck in horror movies, then Max Brown has possibly fared even worse. In fact, his contribution to this piece is probably the worst movie talked about here.

As Kristian Hargreaves, Brown was one of Hollyoaks’ long line of interchangeable, bed hopping students and non-too-memorable a character. In Turistas he’s one of horror’s long line of interchangeable vacation makers getting butchered in a foreign land. Alongside Melissa George, Josh Duhamel and that British guy who was in Go and used to be in Grange Hill, Brown makes up the numbers as one of a clutch of unlucky backpackers that fall foul of an organ harvesting racket, run by a baddie who looks like Nick Knowles from DIY SOS.

Brown doesn’t even get a spectacular death scene to add to his CV, as he is simply beaten and dragged off to be sliced open. The movie really only has one truly gory moment before it's back to more scenes of people swimming and walking through the jungle. The obvious ones survive and the ones who’ve had sex don’t. It’s no wonder Max Brown has steered clear of the genre since.

Warren Brown

On Hollyoaks: nasty piece of work Andy Holt.

In Horror: Marky in Dead Set.

Ooh, they don’t come more evil in Hollyoaks than Andy Holt. Luring unsuspecting women into his bed by illegal pharmaceutical means, Warren Brown gave viewers one of the show’s most memorable villains. He died when he ran into a pole, so that was nice.

Warren Brown has established himself as reliable hand in TV drama since his stint in Chester, appearing in the likes of Luther and Inside Men. He even popped up as one of Bane’s henchmen in The Dark Knight Rises, but his single contribution to horror so far is in Charlie Brooker’s zombie serial Dead Set.

Brown was one of the participants in a fictional version of Big Brother when a zombie outbreak threatens Britain. Dead Set appeared when people actually cared about Big Brother, and while it carried a novelty value of seeing past house mates and Davina McCall going all undead, it provided a remarkable amount of gore for an E4 show. Andy Nyman, the highlight as loathsome producer Patrick, meets a particularly gruesome end.

It probably wasn’t as clever as Charlie Brooker thought it was, and didn’t quite get over the “we are all zombies in front of the television” message it wanted to, but Brown and the rest of a cast, which included Kevin Eldon and Jamie Winstone, made it decent enough. Warren’s Marky was your typical BB alpha male.

Roxanne McKee

On Hollyoaks: ice queen Louise Summers.

In Horror: Nicky in F.

Roxanne McKee is probably more recognisable to readers of this site as Doreah, handmaiden to Daenerys Targaryen on Game Of Thrones, but before that she was Hollyoaks’ vixen Louise Summers, who met her end when her fiancé smothered her with a pillow on Christmas day. Which also happened to be their wedding day, so not a good day all round.

In between Hollyoaks and Westeros, McKee appeared in F, Johannes Roberts’ school-based horror. McKee played an admin assistant at teacher David Schofield’s high school, which finds itself under siege from a group of mysterious hooded figures. It is a movie which divides opinion, but this writer comes down firmly on the side that believes F to be one of the best horror movies of the last decade. The movie taps into the identifiable fear of going to school and infuses that with the stuff of nightmares. It plays out in desolate, clinically creepy corridors and has one of the best open endings in recent memory. It’s rare that horror is done so right as it is with F.

The movie really belongs to Schofield and Eliza Bennett, who plays his daughter, but McKee makes her brief time on screen memorable as she’s the victim of one of the movie's nastiest moments, and a stunning make up job that lingers in the brain for days, along with many other elements of this great movie.

Emma Rigby

On Hollyoaks: bulimia sufferer Hannah Ashworth.

In Horror: Samantha in Demons Never Die.

Emma Rigby won much praise for her time on Hollyoaks as Hannah Ashworth. She was at the center of one of the show's most hard hitting storylines at the time, which dealt with bulimia and anorexia.

Now popping up in various TV shows on both sides of the Atlantic (she’s the Red Queen in Once Upon A Time In Wonderland), the illness her character suffered from on Hollyoaks translated to the one she took on for British slasher Demons Never Die – a movie which is much better than it has any right to be given that its primary marketing tool was that it also featured Tulisa (I think she’s in a band and on X-Factor).

Rigby is one of a group of teens who commit to a suicide pact, only to change their minds as a masked killer starts picking them off one by one. Emma’s bulimic model Samantha suffers from ‘second girl syndrome’ so isn’t in the movie for very long, but she’s not bad for what time she does spend on screen. Demons Never Die owes a huge debt to Wes Craven’s Scream movies. There are some scenes lifted directly out of that series, but it does enough to keep up the interest with a few genuinely creepy moments. It’s a shame the ending makes no sense whatsoever.

Davinia Taylor

On Hollyoaks: bad girl Jude Cunningham.

In Horror: Lauren in Urban Gothic episode, The One Where.

Jude Cunningham was the original Hollyoaks wild girl. Stealing cars and jewelry, she ended up taking her dead sister’s passport and fleeing the country and the authorities. Since her departure from Hollyoaks, Davinia Taylor has been busy marrying and divorcing a footballer, but she did turn up back in 2000 in one of the best episodes from horror anthology show Urban Gothic.

Urban Gothic ran for two series and was made up of short, half hour horror stories that went on a weekly basis on late night Channel 5. Some of them were good, some not so much, but Taylor’s, which paid homage to US sitcom Friends, was a blood-soaked and memorable one. Davinia’s Lauren is one of a group of friends that also includes Crispin Bonham Carter and a pre-Peep Show Robert Webb. She begins dating a man named Lucien who plays puppet master with the gang’s relationships and inner torments, eventually bringing out their resentments and hatred. Still, it’s good to have friends that you can rely on to help you dispose of a body.

The episode was as characteristically dark as many of Urban Gothic’s offerings and stood out thanks to its semi-recognisable cast. Taylor shows some decent horror chops here, so it’s shame she never did much else. The episode ends on a deliciously dark note and is well worth seeking out. It’d be great to see Urban Gothic given a revival.

Hannah Tointon

On Hollyoaks: the always-in-trouble little sister Katy Fox.

In Horror: Casey in The Children.

Hannah Tointon was only on Hollyoaks for about a year, mainly a facility for advancing storylines with her on screen brother, Warren Fox. She did have the honor of being kidnapped and driven over the edge of a cliff, though.

Tointon has had better success in horror since leaving ‘Oaks than some of her co-stars. She’s in the upcoming Young, High And Dead, and was an essential ingredient in director Tom Shankland’s 'kids do the scariest things' movie, The Children. Set over a New Year's weekend at a remote farm house, two families find themselves set upon by their little darlings when the younger members of the party go all Damian. It’s an intense movie which amplifies the frustration of parenthood to an extreme level, as well as delivering some seriously sinister kids. There’s a dinner table scene that acts as the catalyst for the following bloodshed which puts any tea time tantrum your offspring may have thrown into clear perspective.

Hannah plays the eldest child, caught between the adults and the rugrats. She does the misunderstood teen thing really well, and doesn’t go over the top hysterical when the mayhem begins. The movie has a slightly frustrating lack of explanation as to why these little ones turn into homicidal maniacs, but it does a very good job of exaggerating the tension of sibling rivalries and family get-togethers, and mixing that with some supernatural stuff.

Rush, Review

$
0
0
ReviewSeb Patrick9/4/2013 at 8:24AM

A famous Formula One rivalry becomes a biopic in Ron Howard's Rush. Here's Seb's review of a great motorsport movie...

Sometimes, reality can prove itself better than fiction. If Rush were an entirely fabricated story about the rivalry between two racing drivers in the 1970s, then it would probably have a quite clear delineation between them: a smiling "good guy" for the audience to root for and who ultimately triumphs, versus a cynical "bad guy" who frequently looks to be on top before his eventual defeat. Instead, it's a movie with two heroes, allowing the viewer to decide whether to sympathise with maverick playboy James Hunt (Chris Hemsworth), analytical recluse Niki Lauda (Daniel Brühl), or both.

In stark contrast to the last great F1-related movie – Asif Kapadia's documentary Senna, whose influence creeps into almost every corner of Ron Howard's biopic – Rush is hence firmly not the tale of one driver. Instead, the attention of the narrative veers back and forth between the pair, not unlike an on-track duel where neither can quite get the upper hand.

Having introduced Hemsworth's charming yet self-destructive drive-and-shag machine and Brühl's prickly, shrewd careerist, and placed them in direct conflict with an early clash at a Formula Three meeting, the movie then separates their career paths and social lives until they actually reach Formula One and become title rivals in the infamous, and incident-packed, 1976 season. In doing so, Howard and screenwriter Peter Morgan actually make their most significant break with actual history, disregarding the fact that the real Hunt and Lauda shared a flat together in London for a time, and were never the insult-trading antagonists that this script makes them out to be.

It's an understandable decision to make, however, in so much as it manufactures more in the way of conflict than might otherwise have existed. But it also leads to a wider flaw, which is that the narrative comes off as somewhat schizophrenic. Each time the audience is allowed to settle in to the life and personality of one character, they take a sudden step back and the other driver comes to the fore.

Hunt, in particular, suffers each time the story switches away from him, and although Hemsworth brings the requisite effortless charm to the role, he's never really called upon to examine the obvious inner demons of a man who constantly chases thrill and pleasure yet seemingly never allows himself actual happiness. This also means that Olivia Wilde's role as Hunt's first wife Suzy Miller is downright wasted – other than having a galvanising effect on Hunt's career at a particular point, the buildup and subsequent breakdown of their relationship is never explored in any satisfying detail.

It's Lauda, then, who benefits more, particularly thanks to a downright uncanny and compelling performance from Brühl, who doesn't so much play the role as inhabit it entirely (and one suspects he would manage to achieve this with or without the false front teeth that emphasise just why Lauda's nickname in the paddock was "The Rat"). His own romantic subplot has more depth to it, becoming the story of his eventual wife Marlene Knaus (Alexandra Maria Lara) getting under his almost wilfully, obstinately cold exterior ("If I'm going to do this with anyone," he tells her on their wedding day, "it might as well be you.") Hunt may have attracted more attention from the tabloids, but Lauda comes off as the significantly more interesting and complex figure.

Of course, the off-track tale is only half of the story, and more than anything, Rush is likely to be judged on how it pulls off the actual racing atmosphere. In this sense, it's hard to see it as anything other than a triumph. Admittedly the competition is hardly fierce – open-wheeled racing has only really been covered in fictional form in the pretty but hollow 1966 Grand Prix, and in Renny Harlin's somewhat unconvincing Driven – but Rush easily sets itself out as the finest big screen representation the sport has yet had, arguably even surpassing Senna's use of real-life footage in terms of presenting an engaging, visceral experience.

"Men love women," eccentric team boss Lord Hesketh tells a girlfriend of Hunt's early in the movie, "but they really love cars." That being the case, Rush is basically pornography for petrolheads – the ugly, hulking brutes that were F1 cars of the late 70s are made beautiful by lingering close-ups, and astonishing sound design that relentlessly bombards the ears whenever an engine is fired up. The weight of those heavy, clattering pre-carbon fiber machines is made tangible, and you might even feel like you're actually smelling all those gasoline fumes.

Howard directs the speed sequences with verve and flair, rarely relying on gimmicks – save the odd slightly ethereal blurry first-person sequence – and instead simply conveying a pure sense of thrill and pace. It perhaps helps that the story doesn't need to rely on contrived back-and-forth overtaking battles on the track – one of the quirks of the 1976 season was that Hunt and Lauda rarely raced together at the front, each usually taking victory while the other was retired or lower down the order – so the movie can sell its tension on pure atmosphere alone. The choreography of famous moments such as Lauda's fiery crash at the Nurburgring, meanwhile, is so precise that it's easy to imagine Howard has discovered new, high-resolution footage of the actual event.

When it hits top gear, Rush is a thrilling, frenetic experience that immerses the viewer fully in a world that's equal parts grit and glamour, with admirable attention to detail and – despite a few liberties taken here and there – a determination to be even-handed about both its protagonists. It's difficult to say whether the human story alone is enough to appeal to those who aren't at least passing fans of F1, but whenever it gets behind the wheel it has a serious claim to being the best motor sport movie yet.

The Star Wars #1 (Dark Horse Comics) Review

$
0
0
ReviewJohn Saavedra9/4/2013 at 9:00AM

Dark Horse has gone back to the roots of Star Wars...and this time they really mean it! The Star Wars #1 kicks off their adaptation of George Lucas' original, unfilmed vision for the saga!

I remember the first time I watched Empire of Dreams, the 3-hour long documentary about the creation of the Star Wars original trilogy, the holy grail of nerdom and inspirer of all nerditudes. The documentary sheds light on the painful process of producing the trilogy including the setbacks, the struggle to get funding, the uncertainty that anyone gave a shit about space operas, and a 300-page monster screenplay that could not fit into one movie. Sprinkled into George Lucas’ original screenplay are stories and characters that didn’t make it into the finished films. The Star Wars celebrates George Lucas’ earliest draft of his science fiction masterpiece. Although some of the story elements remain (in a very radical fashion), it’s shocking how Lucas’ original vision differed from what we finally saw on that glorious premiere night back in 1977.

I’m going to preface my review of the comic book as a comic book by first mentioning how fun it is to have this much-coveted time capsule. Until now, Lucas’ original draft has been pretty much kept in the shadows, in a vault far, far away. To see a different version of this beloved story is a tasty treat. Any chance I get to experience Star Wars from a new angle or to revisit the beloved characters, I take it. Star Wars fans, this new series will satisfy your deepest fanboy desires (like a wet dream). Thanks to Dark Horse, fans have one more memento to hold close to their hearts.

[related article: The Star Wars #1 Preview Pages]

Unfortunately, as a comic book, the story is mediocre at best. The overall feel of the book might churn your stomach as you watch the tight-ass characters of The Star Wars talk like they’re in one big galactic polo match. There isn’t a sense of struggle as much as there is a need to discuss politics at the Emperor’s house. More than ever before, Star Wars is treated like a social commentary in the opening pages.

Luke Skywalker is actually a middle-aged general, leader of the forces of the planet Aquilae, the final Rebel stronghold against the New Empire. Believed to be dead, Skywalker is one of the last Jedi-Bendu warriors  in the galaxy after most of the order was annihilated by the Knights of Sith/New Empire. Aquilae and the Empire, whose capital is Alderaan, are on the brink of war unless the Aquilaeans sign a treaty that will bring them under the rule of the Emperor (who sports a very fashionable Fu manchu moustache).

Other storylines include Leia going off to galactic college, a hipster Lord Vader (sans trademark helmet) who likes to contemplate murdering Jedi while staring out of viewports, an Aquilaean priest named Tarkin, and Jedi Kane Starkiller’s return to Aquilae after the death of his youngest son, Deak.

Starkiller is the most interesting member in this cast, which, for the most part, is made up of shells of what they would become for later generations of nerds. Although there’s a Vader in this version of Star Wars, Starkiller most closely resembles that evil villain we all know and love. He’s 3/4 machine under his synthetic skin, his head and right arm the only sign that he was ever human.  In hopes that Skywalker might train his remaining son, Annikin, Starkiller brings the boy to Aquilae before the Sith have a chance to hunt him down. Skywalker isn’t too keen on the idea of training the boy and Starkiller loses his temper and rips the synthetic skin off his metal chest. Anger leads to hatred is what Master Yoda always said...Could this be an early sign of Starkiller’s eventual fall to the dark side?

The rest of the story is about as exciting as a Hutt triathlon. I can only hope that The Star Wars is able to deliver a unique experience, one that becomes as memorable as its predecessor.

  

The Star Wars #1
Script: J.W. Rinzler
Art: Mike Mayhew
Colors: Rain Beredo
Lettering: Michael Heisler

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

6

The 15 Most Valuable Movie Franchises

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/4/2013 at 10:53AM

With another summer movie season done, we examine the 15 most valuable movie franchises at the moment and whose worth is going up and whose is going down as the box office derby moves into the fall.

And it’s over. Like a gorgeous kiss of sun before the fall of evening, another summer has come to pass, and we are all left to settle into our post-Labor Day lives. Technically speaking, summer does not end until September 22, but as every school kid knows that when the classes start and the parents quit wearing white, it is time to look to the leaves.
 
So it is with Hollywood as well. While the studios are always eager to start the summer movie season earlier and earlier—it is dipping well into the beginning of April with Captain America: The Winter Soldier next year—they too acknowledge that they have squeezed the last bit of excited franchising from moviegoers by the time the beaches empty (at least until Thanksgiving). Everyone is ready to take a break from big blockbusters and even bigger sequel-led franchising by the time the cool breezes come. Yet, even the most lax geek is concurrently curious to look back and estimate. Just how did your favorite franchise do this year? Or where do your pet-characters stand in contrast to the others in the field as one movie season ends and the hype for another soon begins?
 
Well, we here at Den of Geek are happy to take a look at what another summer meant to the ever-shifting horse placement in the box office derby that lasts every 12 months, and what the contests for the next year (or two) seem to mean for Hollywood’s evermore dependent bread and butter.
 
Join us as we consider just what are the most valuable franchises in Hollywood circa 2013.
 
***SPECIAL NOTE: We will only be considering franchises still releasing films into the foreseeable future. Sorry, Mr. Potter and Ms. Swan***


 
15. Star Trek
Most Recent Entry: Star Trek Into Darkness ($462 million worldwide)
By far one of the oldest and most enduring franchises, Star Trek is a great place to kickoff this list. After all, the franchise just celebrated its second reboot/remake/re-whatever this summer and already enjoys a threequel that has been placed on the fast track, which star Zachary Qunto stated could shoot as early as next year. Albeit, we are willing to bet that the franchise may take a little bit longer to launch once more into the boffo cosmos: All the better to enjoy the 50th anniversary hype bound to spring up in 2016.
 
Still, as ancient and illustrious as the franchise’s history is, there is no denying that its credibility took a hit in 2013. Sure, May’s Star Trek Into Darkness received mostly positive and upbeat reviews from critics who had not yet been beaten into CGI submission. However, the film clearly divided fans who still cannot agree if Benedict Cumberbatch playing Khan is a good thing. Further, the sequel took the length of a U.S. presidential term to reach its multiplex of port. In that time, excitement has clearly waned over the JJ Abrams-led reimagining. While the joyful Star Trek (2009) reboot silenced cynics with its impressive $257 million domestic haul ($385 million worldwide), it clearly did not build the way studios hoped. In contrast, previously well received launches and reboots, including Batman Begins and Transformers, were able to birth even bigger box office sequels, but Star Trek shrank at the domestic box office by a worrisome $29 million. And I’m sure Paramount Pictures recalls that just over a decade ago, Star Trek: Nemesis grossed only $67 million worldwide.
 
Fortunately, this is nothing to fret over, Trekkers. With a new director at the helm for a more immediate sequel, and a 50th anniversary to capitalize on, there is little doubt that there are still new box office charts to boldly go on this lucrative enterprise.


 
14. X-Men
Most Recent Entry: The Wolverine ($358 million worldwide)
X-Men is a staggeringly dense and confusing franchise with a mythology more confounding than a Rubik’s Cube. In short, it is finally doing its source material proud!
 
Credited as being the first “modern” superhero series of the 21st century, X-Men launched in 2000 with a meager $75 million budget, which carried it shockingly close to $300 million worldwide. It is arguable whether 20th Century Fox realized what a goldmine it had until Spider-Man kicked the door off the super-greens a few years later, however they clearly figured it out by 2009. Despite “ending” the X-Trilogy with the totally forgettable and mediocre X-Men: The Last Stand (2006), the franchise has somehow managed three more entries. Between X-Men Origins: Wolverine, X-Men: First Class and The Wolverine releasing in the last four years, it turns out there is still plenty of ground for the series to stand on.
 
However, the series has definitely shrunk in its appeal. While I would personally argue that Matthew Vaughn’s X-Men: First Class is easily the best in the franchise’s history and one of the better superhero movies ever made, it was also the least successful of the last four entries, grossing only $353 million worldwide. This summer’s The Wolverine also did worse in the U.S. market than any installment to date with a paltry $128 million domestic—that’s $29 million less than the original X-Menmovie that didn’t have 13 years of added inflation and 3D surcharges to help its final tally. Of course, this is likely due to the pathetic quality of Last Stand, which grossed $459 million worldwide, and X-Men Origins.
 
Yet, Fox is only now seeing the real potential of the X-Universe. With 2014’s upcoming X-Men: Days of Future Past, Fox is essentially rebooting the franchise by using time travel as a vehicle for wiping away all the dippy sequels nobody liked (not unlike Star Trek’s reboot). Even better, they are doing it by bringing back everyone’s favorite actors in the franchise all for one movie—Hugh Jackman, Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellen, Michael Fassbender, James McAvoy, Jennifer Lawrence, Ellen Page, etc.—and they’re using it as a launching ground for a universe as dense with spin-offs and semi-sequels as Disney’s own Marvel Studios. It currently appears that X-Men’s slightly more adult themes of racism, bigotry and social acceptance, right down to open parallels with the gay rights movement of today and the civil rights leaders of the 1960s, has cost the franchise from ever soaring to the financial stratospheres of Spider-Man or The Avengers. However, if the series can produce a reliable $300+ million box office entry every other year for the next decade…it will be doing just fine. Heck, with so many potential spin-offs, it could end up as one of the defining summer staple for years to come, which sounds great to any studio’s bottom line.


 
13. Superman
Most Recent Entry: Man of Steel ($657 million worldwide)
Superman may be the Godfather of Superheroes, but he has dove in hype far more than soared in recent years. Despite box office experts stating that this summer’s Man of Steel would earn at least $800 million in worldwide receipts, with $1 billion still on the table as early as the Monday after opening weekend, the dour superfly reboot is going to have to settle for less than $700 million. To be fair, this is far superior to 2006’s Superman Returns earning the reboot-killing figure of $391 million worldwide, but when a franchise based on one of the most globally recognized brands cannot cross $400 million, there is a problem. Consider: If Warner Brothers was happy with Man of Steel’s returns, do you really think that they would have placed Batman in “Superman’s sequel?”
 
Fortunately, Superman is still one of the most valuable brands in the history of marketing. More than any other superhero, his emblem is ubiquitous. Nearly any person in the world, at least certainly one living near a movie theater, can recognize its meaning. And even on an entry that has divided fans, yet again, and earned the overblown wrath of spiteful critics, Man of Steel is still an unqualified success and one of the year’s biggest hits. This is a testament to the character whose future only looks bright, no matter how many 9/11 images Zack Snyder may throw at the screen.
 
The inclusion of the currently far more popular Batman in a Superman sequel only guarantees more exposure. And just ask the already beloved Iron Man what a team-up can do for your solo franchise’s numbers. Beyond that, the Man of Steel franchise appears to serve as the bedrock for a future DC Cinematic Universe that may one day include The Flash, Wonder Woman, and even the oft-fabled Justice League. If one puts Superman at the center of this multi-franchise world, all of a sudden Man of Steel looks like a great takeoff toward the billions to come.


 
12. The Fast and The Furious
Most Recent Entry: Fast & Furious 6 ($787 million worldwide)
Who would have thought when The Fast and The Furious opened in 2001 that it would become one of the most lucrative (and endless) movie brands of the 21st century? Universal Pictures surely didn’t. While that original entry made an impressive $207 million worldwide, star Vin Diesel opted out of an immediate sequel. By the time the third installment came about, Paul Walker was also gone and Universal was even toying with turning the logo into a Direct-to-DVD brand. But somehow, directing newcomer Justin Lin turned that threequel, The Fast and The Furious: Tokyo Drift, into a mildly entertaining installment. He also got something far more valuable out of it: Vin Diesel agreeing to a cameo.
 
Indeed, Diesel eventually decided to come back for a new entry called (what else?) Fast and Furious, which was billed as the first “real” sequel, as it had all of the stars from the original back. But then Diesel and Lin did two more back-to-backs, which brought characters from the other movies back together as well. Think an automotive, grease- covered dirty cousin to The Avengers. Throw in Dwayne Johnson and some hilarious chest-thumping between the stars when cars aren’t crashing and colliding in visually stimulating ways, and we end up with the most purely unapologetic action series of the last 15 years; one who has seen its last two adventures gross more worldwide than storied legacies like X-Men and Star Trek. It is also one that has no end in sight. Expectations are not exactly high on a series about car thieves who…steal cars that they drive very, very fast. As long as Diesel, Walker, Johnson and other familiar faces keep agreeing to show up for more inventive vehicular mayhem, there is no reason that the series should not continue easily crossing $600 million worldwide on a budget half the size of the caped and cowled franchises. Oh, and they can be turned out like boosted wheels: Fast & Furious 7 comes out next July, only 14 months after Fast & Furious 6.


 
11. The Hunger Games
Most Recent Entry: The Hunger Games ($691 million worldwide)
Finally, an entry where the lead isn’t cut to look like an action figure. The Hunger Games left box office watchers shell-shocked in 2012 when it earned $408 million at the U.S. box office alone (that’s better than three out of this summer’s four superhero movies). This put it in the Top 15 Highest Grossing Domestic Films of all time. You could say the series was on fire.
 
Based on a Young Adult series about a girl forced to battle other children to the death for reality television sport, complete with a love triangle, this series did not seem like the surest of bets. Granted, it would make money on a $78 million budget, but even initially comparable Twilight, another YA series with genre elements and a love triangle, only crossed $300 million domestic once in five installments. But unlike those films, The Hunger Games is actually good appeals to more than a primarily young female teen demographic. This new series captures that too, but it also has almost as good a pull with young teenage boys and, even more surprising, their parents. Even 2012 presidential candidate Mitt Romney made it be known that he watched this pop culture lightning rod.
 
In the time since that franchise kickoff, star Jennifer Lawrence has become America’s Sweetheart by earning her second Academy Award nomination and her first win for Silver Linings Playbook. The actress, now enjoying a fandom that rivals Katniss’, is set to lead The Hunger Games: Catching Fire this Thanksgiving, which is far primer real estate than the 2012 episode’s March release. Better still, Hollywood precedence shows that the sequels to these teen-leaning films always do better than the original. Twilight grossed $192 million domestic and $392 million worldwide. Comparatively, its first sequel earned $296 million domestic and $709 million worldwide. That series tapped out with $829 million worldwide on its final bow, yet nobody over 18 seems to ever admit that they liked those movies. What can the much more generally accepted Hunger Games and Ms. Lawrence do with three consecutive holiday releases between now and Thanksgiving 2015?


 
10. Pirates of the Caribbean
Most Recent Entry: Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides ($1.04 billion worldwide)
Once upon a time, Captain Jack’s greatest claim to fame on pop culture was being the name of a Billy Joel song. However, everyone today knows the name of Jack Sparrow. CAPTAIN Jack Sparrow at that.
 
Considered a monumental risk in the early 2000s by Disney management, some of whom apparently thought Johnny Depp was “gay-ing” up their movie, Jack Sparrow of Pirates of the Caribbeanis the most iconic original film hero arguably since Indiana Jones. However one may feel about the quality of the Pirates sequels, there is no denying that their success was built off the end of Depp’s contorted and quirky hat. Undeniably, those sequels also prove the rule that goodwill builds to even bigger returns. While the original Curse of the Black Pearl earned an eyebrow-raising $305 million domestic and $654 million worldwide (not to mention an Oscar nomination for Depp), its most direct sequel earned an even more breathtaking $423 million domestic and $1.06 billion worldwide.
 
Clearly the franchise has waned in popularity, as the third voyage with the good Cap’n only grossed $963 million worldwide. Yet, if you keep a weather eye on the horizon, it is still easily one of the most reliable brands in the 21st century. Haters can point to the ominous domestic drop of 2011’s entry, which with $241 million is the first Pirates movie not to cross $300 million in the States. But around the world? Witty Jack is more popular than ever, as his $800 million overseas totals carried the character back over the $1 billion threshold. It is thus no surprise that Disney is already furiously at work on Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales for 2015 with a SIXITH movie also likely in the cards. Savvy?


 
9. Spider-Man
Most Recent Entry: The Amazing Spider-Man ($752 million worldwide)
And still, one franchise that has followed an almost dual trajectory (domestically) with Pirates is that of everyone’s favorite friendly neighborhood webhead. Launched in 2002 with the industry-changing Spider-Man (the first film to gross over $100 million in a single weekend, leading to $821 million worldwide), the series has consistently proven nigh indestructible. It may have even redefined the industry again when Sony Pictures rebooted the still infinitely popular franchise in 2012 with The Amazing Spider-Man. Veritably, this was mostly due to the fact that director Sam Raimi and star Tobey Maguire bowed out of an early pre-production process for Spider-Man 4, and Sony needed to rush a fourth web-slinger film to theaters or risk losing the license back to Marvel’s new home at Disney. But hey, even if the Andrew Garfield reboot was met with a lukewarm $262 million domestic, it still crossed $750 million worldwide. Very few franchises can literally drop $140 million in worldwide grosses between entries, as Spider-Man 3 earned $890 million, and shrug it off.
 
More importantly, The Amazing Spider-Man sets the precedent that even beloved visions and interpretations of characters, such as Raimi and Maguire’s take on Peter Parker, can be replaced at the drop of a hat. Amazing may have suffered some backlash for being only five years after Spider-Man 3, as well for essentially remaking the exact same plot of the original Spider-Man, but it still made boffo. And now, with the Raimi trilogy even further in the rearview mirror, Sony is banking on Garfield-led sequels to be more readily embraced by moviegoing audiences, as Sony has slated THREE Amazing Spider-Mansequels to be released in the next five years! Obviously, their incredibly daring gamble to play it safe with Spidey has influenced other studios, such as Warner Brothers who unapologetically is rebooting the Batman franchise just three years after Christopher Nolan’s crowning genre achievement, The Dark Knight Trilogy, concluded its epic run. Even Marvel Studios is reportedly looking beyond Robert Downey Jr. for the future of Tony Stark. Unlike Jack Sparrow, Spidey proves that some brands can endure no matter how popular an actor under the mask may be.


 
8. The Tolkien Universe
Most Recent Entry: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey ($1.01 billion worldwide)
Many of the tropes and types in all this genre fare have one progenitor: J.R.R. Tolkien. A World War I veteran, poet, and professor of English Language and Literature at Merton College, Oxford, Tolkien is a man known for many things. Of course, his greatest legacy is the world of Middle-Earth. The most comprehensive and definitive form of “high fantasy,” Tolkien’s fantastic medieval world of magic and wonder, camaraderie and insidiousness still remains the blueprint for most major fantasy fiction. He developed this methodically detailed universe over decades with books such as The Silmarillion, The Hobbit and Lord of The Rings.
 
The last title, a three-volume mega-novel that is often mistaken for three separate books, had been called unfilmmable throughout the whole of the 20th century, despite many attempts, including by The Beatles during the 1960s. Yet, when New Line Cinema allowed Peter Jackson to tell the book in not only his requested two films, but in THREE, Jackson embarked on arguably the most ambitious film shoot in history. At 9.5 hours (in its theatrical form), he evidently did shoot a lot of film. The Lord of the Rings film trilogy defied skeptics with each film crossing $800 million worldwide, and ending on the Oliphant-sized $1.1 billion in 2003. In the intervening decade, everyone, most of all New Line, waited for an adaptation to Lord of the Rings’forebearer, The Hobbit. Even after New Line got rolled up into another logo for Warner Brothers, the anticipation was rampant. After efforts by both Sam Raimi and most especially Guillermo del Toro fell through, Jackson decided to shoot a film version of the brisk 276-page book himself…into three separate three-hour films.
 
Whatever you may think of the soundness of this concept, or the quality of the deliberately paced 2012 installment The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, consider how much financial sense it makes. Ever since WB discovered you can cut one book into two with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, everyone has been signing on for the profit-doubling concept for final installments. Well, Peter Jackson outdid them all by discovering one can adapt a single novel, and a fairly short one at that, into at least nine hours of cinema. That also is going to likely equal $3 billion dollars as well. Add in double dip DVDs, extended cuts, and re-extended cuts with additional deleted scene features, and this franchise will continue to be making money after we’ve ALL crossed over to the Western Shores.


 
7. Iron Man
Most Recent Entry: Iron Man 3 ($1.2 billion worldwide)
It is still hard to believe that a perpetual B-lister like Iron Man, Marvel’s cross between Bruce Wayne and Howard Hughes, is now one of the most valued superhero names in the world. But he is, and there is one man to thank for this above all others: Robert Downey Jr. Once Hollywood’s bad boy of squandered opportunity in the early 2000s, Downey came roaring back. He starred in the brilliant cult comedy Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005) and mainstream hit Tropic Thunder (2008), but the role that elevated him from merely being a comeback actor and straight into the A-list with a pulse beam is of course Iron Man.
 
For the first time in history, people were lining to see a superhero movie for the scenes where he ISN’T in the costume. Both Iron Man and Iron Man 2 made over half-a-billion worldwide, with most of the grosses coming from the U.S. But after Downey’s moustache-sporting alter ego headlined The Avengers, he is now a billion dollar character. And that’s the real beauty of the Marvel Studios system. This is not one franchise, but a single head of a Hollywood Hydra still in its infancy. Iron Man is its own unique franchise—which makes it all the better when he appears in The Incredible Hulk or gives the whole universe a bump when he brings in the largest audience for a total team-up movie. As long as Downey is in the suit, the sky’s the limit. As long as Downey’s in the suit…


 
6. Transformers
Most Recent Entry: Transformers: Dark of the Moon ($1.1 billion worldwide)
But for some movie franchises, characters, much less actors, are expendable. Look no further than the unstoppable box office juggernaut that is the Transfomers franchise. Based on an ‘80s toy line and cartoon series, the Gen-X nostalgia morphed in the hands of Michael Bay into something big, loud and vastly profitable. Yes, Steven Spielberg’s name is plastered all over these movies as a producer, but at best his influence is only marginally felt in the original 2007 entry, which circled around a boy (Shia LaBeouf) and how getting his first car got him a girlfriend (Megan Fox). This automotive E.T. plot was dropped in the second one, which made a $100 million more in the States despite the near universal panning of the picture. The most recent Transformers was the first in the series to cross $1 billion even though it cut out the much hyped Fox, and next year Bay is releasing a soft reboot with Transformers 4, a film that has completely jettisoned LaBeouf in favor of Mark Wahlberg.
 
With the advent of 3D ticket sales and an IMAX explosion between the second and third film, the series shows no signs of losing steam. And unlike certain other billion dollar franchises, this one shows that nothing is replaceable beyond the promise of giant CGI robots crashing into buildings. And it is a guarantee that Hollywood can produce that many, many, many more times.


 
5. Avatar
Most Recent Entry: Avatar ($2.7 billion worldwide)
Beginning the Top Five is the most successful film of all time. While some may have scoffed at director James Cameron promising a technological game-changer following his other most successful film of all time, Titanic, the renowned filmmaker had the last laugh. His blue CGI creations in Avatar are still the most photo-real animated creations to date, but further he paved the way for 3D surcharges to be added on to nearly every big budget movie you have seen in the last four years. Everything is in 3D because Avatar “reinvented” the tech.
 
Despite what some may critique about the film’s actual innovations, it effortlessly captured the public’s imagination as the 2009 flick coasted through the early 2010 box office, becoming the highest grossing film of all time (with unadjusted inflation). People around the world wanted to get lost in the film’s Pandora, and a fan community dreaming of this picturesque animation popped up overnight. Further, Cameron has finally announced the long-awaited Avatar 2. And he added an Avatar 3 and Avatar 4 to the slate as well. With plans to film them concurrently, a la Peter Jackson, the trilogy of Avatar sequels are slated to open every Christmas between 2016 and 2018. While the initial hype has died down since the original film, hence Cameron also commissioning a series of novels meant to expand the universe beyond the single film before the sequels launch, there is no denying that it still has a hold on people. If each Transformers movie can make more than the last when viewers continue to swear off hating the last one, it appears very likely that Cameron and 20th Century Fox are poised to make AT LEAST $3 billion off the Avatar sequels in the next five years at the multiplexes alone.
 
Maybe Cameron should have made the aliens green.


 
4. Batman
Most Recent Entry: The Dark Knight Rises ($1.08 billion worldwide)
However, it is hard to beat the single most lucrative superhero of all time. Avatar may have made nearly $3 billion on one film and has three more entries on the docket, but to paraphrase director Christopher Nolan, they’ll still be making Batman movies after we’re all long dead.
 
As it turns out, super-powerless Batman has proven to be the most durable cape to ever flap in Hollywood. First (memorably) brought to the screen as a product of camp satire of authority in the 1960s by a grooving Adam West, Batman has been reimagined nearly half a dozen times on the big screen. He has been a creature of near-supernatural weirdness and shadow under Tim Burton, a real life action figure with a nipple fetish under Joel Schumacher, and a haunting parable for our post-9/11 and post-Great Recession World with Christopher Nolan. The last of which is the first superhero run to earn true respect and legitimacy amongst critics and filmmakers alike, even changing the entire Academy Award Best Picture bracket after The Dark Knight’s infamous snubbing.
 
Yet one year after that iteration of the character concluded, we have another announced for 2015. While hilariously short-sighted fans bemoan the casting of Ben Affleck as Batman, their overreaction only proves how hotly anticipated the return of the Dark Knight truly has become. In fact, the only reason we are seeing Batman again so soon is that Warner Brothers has decided that Superman cannot cut it on his own with a barely adequate $650 million worldwide gross. Now, in our post-Avengers world, it is not hard to imagine the same scenario playing out every time WB has a masked underperformer. “Wonder Woman didn’t cross $800 million? Light the Bat-Signal!”
 
And so it is that Batman’s inclusion in the still-yet-untitled Batman/Superman project all but ensures another $1 billion+ gross for WB and their pointy-earned night rat. Even if Ben Affleck is actually a total flop as the character, audiences have shown they are always eager for a new interpretation. Isn’t that right, Mr. Clooney?
 
Like a particular leaden falcon statue, Batman is the stuff box office dreams are made of.


 
3. The Avengers
Most Recent Entry: The Avengers ($1.5 billion worldwide)
Of course, Marvel Studios has proven that the only thing better than a successful superhero is a successful superhero team. The Avengers may simply have one film out at the moment, but it has single-handidly reinvented how blockbusters and big budget Hollywood tentpoles are made in the 21st century.
 
Originally a curiosity to the industry that fans waited five years for with baited breath, The Avengers proved that when five films all build to a single event, expectations are through the Helicarrier. Even people who never saw any of the previous Marvel Studios pictures made a showing at their nearest multiplex, helping The Avengers become the first movie to ever cross $200 million in a single weekend. That’s clearly more than walking around money.
 
The Avengers is not really a franchise: It is the most brilliant form of movie marketing in a generation. In essence, it is the gravitational sun to a slew of other franchises (currently five if one counts next year’s Guardians of the Galaxy, and that number will grow). Hype for the mere existence of this particular solar system causes audiences to wander into all of the “lesser” franchises from their most popular (Iron Man) to their globally most risky (Captain America). Even the one flop in the group, The Incredible Hulk, comes out of the post-eclipse smelling like roses. So much so that moviegoers, who turned up their noses and refused by and large to attend the last two Hulk films, clamor now for the sight of him. Thus each of the smaller movies ultimately serves as a commercial for the others, as well as the larger event, which then in turn advertises the unending sequels.
 
Like a self-digesting snake, it is a wonder to behold. For the first time, it actually encourages distance and years between each installment. The more (reasonable) length of time between Avengers films allows Marvel to squeeze in as many smaller tentacles to this box office leviathan. For example, Marvel’s “Phase 3” (as sequels now act as waves, instead of individual stories) will feature SEVEN films. We do not even know what three of them officially are, but fans are already excited. And when these bigger franchise films, such as The Avengers, hit...even Asgard will tremble.


 
2. James Bond
Most Recent Entry: Skyfall ($1.1 billion worldwide)
Strangely though, it is still hard to trump the most profitable franchise model of the 20th century. His name is Bond, James Bond, and he has survived the end of the Cold War. Who the Hell are you to say that he can be topped?
 
Ian Fleming, a World War II era spook, created 007 to be a product of 1950s Cold War paranoia. But when Cubby Broccoli and Harry Satlzman reimagined him as the ultimate suave alpha male for the 1960s, they really created something timeless. Once upon a time, people were convinced that James Bond could not survive the absence of Sean Connery. Then it was Roger Moore. Sure, Bond has had his rough spots, such as the lukewarm response received by George Lazenby and Timothy Dalton (two Bonds who have since been reevaluated by the fan base). But even the end of the Cold War couldn’t stop him. GoldenEye (1995) and Pierce Brosnan proved that Bond could still work at the turn of the century, and by the time Daniel Craig donned the tux in 2006 for Casino Royale, it felt more like a cozy tradition our culture goes through every year, as opposed to a risky recasting; like seeing how each host country will light the Olympic Torch every several years.
 
When MGM went under a few years ago, people ran mock-horror stories about this being the end for Bond. However, that seemed about as believable as any one of Ernst Blofeld’s far-out plots. Like all the fans confident in the generational 007 tradition, Sam Mendes and Eon Productions quietly continued production on what would become Bond’s 50th Anniversary film, Skyfall. Coincidentally that is also the first Bond feature to cross $1 billion. And even if it were the last to do so (it won’t be), Bond has proven more durable than any other fictional character not penned by William Shakespeare.
 
We have seen Bond’s Shaft and Star Wars years with Roger Moore, his Miami Vice and Die Hard missteps with Timothy Dalton, the Face: Off and True Lies era with Pierce Brosnan, and the Bourne and Dark Knight moments featuring Craig. He will shift with whatever cultural trend comes next, but he will always do so with a smirk and finely pressed tuxedo. We can all raise our martini glasses to that.


 
1. Star Wars
Most Recent Entry: Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith ($848 million worldwide)
Of course, there is one franchise more valuable than any other at the moment, and it is one that somehow is currently combining the iconography of a 20th century classic with the business model of the 21st. Hello, Star Wars.
 
A long, long time ago in a franchise far, far away, George Lucas created the ultimate summer movie experience. Star Wars combined it all: science fiction, fantasy, old fashioned romance, screwball comedy, MGM-styled movie magic, cutting edge ILM special effects, and a Wookie. Audiences hadn’t quite seen anything like it, even if they had seen it all before. Hence, they lined up for the film’s two tightly connected and brilliantly told sequels, Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi.
 
However, something strange happened. The franchise ended. It did not peter out until audiences grew sick of Han, Luke, Leia, and especially C-3PO (nobody ever grows tired of R2D2 or Chewie). It closed the book…but even George Lucas, the first guy to turn his leading lady into a pez dispenser through merchandizing, could not predict the unending demand. Thus, he attempted to quench it with three very mistaken and thoroughly mediocre prequels between 1999 and 2005. Despite mostly talented casts in all three, none of them worked for various reasons. Yet they all made over $800 million. The first, Star Wars: Episode I: The Phantom Menace even crossed $1 billion back when that actually meant something. Plus, fans still care. Disappointment after disappointment after disappointment? No matter! They'll always care. When Lucas finally relented and sold the rights of his Star Wars to Disney, they rejoiced. There would be more Star Wars films forevermore.
 
With Disney’s decision to supersize Star Wars, the franchise will soon become like Starbucks, one will be open on every corner. Disney has announced plans to begin releasing a Star Wars film, whether official “Episode” titles or spin-offs, every year from 2015 until at least 2022. Disney now has the most durable brand of the 20th century and they’re going to Wario Shake It like The Avengers for all its worth over the next decade. However, it is not hard to imagine this box office hustle will last far longer than that.
 
Some fans of any of the various franchises listed above are sure to point out that only one of six Star Warsfilms has crossed $1 billion. However, that film did so nearly 15 years ago without 3D ticket inflation, IMAX or just regular sky-rocketing ticket prices. In fact, when one considers adjusted ticket inflation, Star Wars is the second most successful film of all time (Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi fill out slots 11th and 15th, high above The Avengers).
 
It’s Star Wars. Could it be anything else?
 
So there are the Top 15 Most Valuable Movie Franchises currently running for your bottom dollar. Agree? Disagree? Excited about the whole system? Leave us a comment explaining just so below!
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Disqus - noscript

1: Nobody EVER thought that "Man of Steel" was going to hit 900 Billion. No movie ever has.

2: Regarding Avatar: Shouldn't a supposed "franchise" actually have more than one movie in it?

3:
Regarding Ben Affleck: I haven't see all the "fan backlash" that you
spaztards in the media keep talking about. I have, however, seen no
fewer than ten thousand moronic articles explaining why all the supposed
"unhappy fans" are wrong.

New Runner Runner Trailer

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/4/2013 at 11:47AM

Justin Timberlake attempts to play the odds against a menacing Ben Affleck and Gemma Arterton in new Runner Runner trailer.

Ben Affleck’s new found love (among other emotions) as the new Batman has all of a sudden made this 20th Century thriller quite the attention grabber. You could say that the marketing is…running with it. I couldn’t resist.
 
In the newest trailer for Runner Runner, the focus becomes even more glaring on good guy Justin Timberlake becoming seduced into a world of gambling, corruption and extortion spearheaded by a smiling Ben Affleck. Affleck plays the requisite alluring villain who will take Timberlake under his wing and possibly even share Gemma Arterton with him.
 
 
The trailer looks very familiar, but for fans ready to see Affleck in another light post-Batman news, this film may just be the ticket.
 
The film, directed by Brad Furman of The Lincoln Lawyer will open on October 4.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live