Quantcast
Channel: Movies – Den of Geek
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live

Max Steel Movie Alive Again, Aiming for 2014 Release

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/4/2013 at 2:53PM

Max Steel movie is in the works with a screenwriter and director already attached!

For a while there, toy lines seemed to be all the rage for big budget movies. Paramount Pictures produced Transformers, GI Joe and Universal released Battleship. One of the projects that got lost in the hustle was an adaptation of Mattel’s Max Steel toy line. Based around a teenage boy who leads a dual life as the superhero Max Steel, a character aided by nanotech robotic probes (or alien technology depending on the interpretation), Paramount intended the produce the project with Taylor Lautner as the titular star.
 
Now, according to Deadline, the project is back on the fast track under the stewardship of Dolphin Entertainment and Open Road with the goal of meeting a 2014 release date.
 
This new Max Steel is to be directed by Stewart Hendler (Sorority Row) who made waves for producing the well-received H+ digital series for Dolphin and Warner Brothers. Christopher Yost (Thor: The Dark World) has already been hired to pen the screenplay.
 
Max Steel first hit pop culture in 2000 with a three-season run produced by Netter Digital Entertainment. Later Mainframe took over the series. Max Steel has since been marketed with nine direct-to-DVD animated films released almost exclusively in Latin America where they have been big sellers. Disney XD recently premiered a new version of the series earlier this year.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

New Trailer For Alfonso Cuaron's Gravity

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/4/2013 at 10:09PM

The newest trailer for Alfonso Cuarón's sci-fi thriller starring George Clooney and Sandra Bullock has landed. And it is hands down the scariest teaser of the year.

A famous science fiction movie once had the tagline: In space, no one can hear you scream. In 2013, filmmaker Alfonso Cuarón has countered that we can…and we may wish we didn’t.
 
In what easily looks to be one of the year’s most compelling (and terrifying) films, Cuarón's Gravity chronicles the journey of Dr. Ryan Stone (Sandra Bullock) on her own space odyssey when she becomes unattached to her space module.
 
The cast consists of George Clooney and Sandra Bullock. One the astronaut lost in space, the other Matt Kowalsky, her only, and possibly final, link to humanity. It looks harrowing, horrific and some other h word.
 
Point is that we and any other geek worth their salt will be there for theatrical launch on October 4.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

The rise of the retailer exclusive

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew9/5/2013 at 7:57AM

As the Star Trek Into Darkness home release spreads extras across multiple stores, Simon wonders, is there any advantage to the consumer?

It never used to matter where you bought your films or games from, as long as you bought them. That was the thinking anyway, and the deal always was that you hand over your money, you get the product you're after, and aside from the occasional collector's edition, that's that.

But as videogamers over the past few years have increasingly found, that isn't that at all. It's not an unreasonable expectation to pay £40 for a game in one store, and to get the same version you'd get if you bought it from another. Yet that's not the case. Publishers have become savvy to the pre-order exclusive, whereby different stores give out different incentives to order a game with them. Just to give a flavor of what's out there, if you pre-order Call Of Duty: Ghosts through Game in the UK, you get a free bonus multiplayer map, or a themed weapon camo.

Meanwhile, should you choose Amazon for Call Of Duty: Ghosts, you get an exclusive Into The Deep Theme, and an in-game patch. You won't, however, get the aforementioned map. In the US, Gamestop offers a weapon camo that you can use in Call Of Duty: Black Ops II, meanwhile. If you don't buy versions from the respective stores, you don't get the extra material.

I don't know about you, but I've always felt a bit cheated by this. I've never had a problem with a collector's sleeve, or something that doesn't tangibly affect the central product that you're buying. Thus, if a free graphic here and there is being banded around for a game, fair enough. But a map? A map that you can't get unless you buy a certain edition of a game, or buy it from a certain store? That's a bit more troubling, isn't it?

It's wrong just to pick on Call Of Duty: Ghosts here, too. The incoming Grand Theft Auto V has weapons available only to those who buy their copy through a certain store. And again, whilst that may be great news for the retailer, that's penalising the customer who chooses to store elsewhere. A different weapon, however slightly, potentially changes the way you play the game.

My idealistic view of the world is this: give away extra free games, posh boxes, collector's editions or whatever, but £40 in one store should buy you the exact same version you get in another. Every weapon, every map, any subtle little addition that'll affect the game, even in the tiniest way.

Sadly, though, rather than this trend abating, it's now spreading, as we've seen with the Blu-ray release of Star Trek Into Darkness. This is a pitiful state of affairs. You'd not unreasonably think that if you pay £20 for a Blu-ray copy of the movie, that you'd get the premium package, with everything included. But you don't. As has been well reported, Paramount has put some featurettes on the disc, but then spread the rest of the extra features around as retailer exclusives.

In particular, this means those who have bought the Blu-ray can't get access to the commentary track that JJ Abrams and his team recorded. Well, they can't unless they're willing to pay for the whole movie again as an iTunes download. You can't download the commentary individually either. It's the whole movie again. 

Assuming that Blu-ray is the format most movie lovers opt for, given that it - in theory at least - presents the movie in the best way possible, to leave off such a movie fan-centric extra from the disc, and then expect people to pay again if they want it, is disgusting.

The rest of the Star Trek Into Darkness extras are scattered around a series of stores. Blinkbox, for instance, has 20 minutes of featurettes that you can't find on the Blu-ray. In the US, if you store at Target or Best Buy, you get an extra disc with more supplements. As The Digital Bits - which uncovered all of this - originally pointed out, these were materials originally produced for the disc release, that Paramount has opted to share around. Thus, if you wanted to get all of the extras for Star Trek Into Darkness, it looks like you've need to buy the full movie, from different stores, four or five times.

That can't be right. The advantage to the retailer is clear, in that it gives Store A a selling point over Store B. The advantage to the consumer? There isn't one. There just isn't.

Movies aren't yet at the stages of games, which is something to be thankful for at least. Whereas a game will offer retailer exclusives that can very slightly have an impact on the main attraction, nobody is re-editing an extra one minute into a movie to differ it from every other store's version of the movie (there have been store exclusive releases, which are annoying, but at least you're not playing roulette with multiple extra features packages). 

But Paramount's actions with Star Trek Into Darkness do sound alarm bells, and significant ones. It may sound like a small thing to make a fuss over, but I don't think it's much to ask for parity. A consumer should just be able to buy the game or movie they want, without being penalised in some way for not buying it from a store that paid extra to get their mitts on an exclusive. And if you are offering content to one place and not the other, at least let us download what we're missing for free. We've still paid full price, after all.

A uniform release was always the original idea, and that should be the bare minimum that end customers should be able to expect. If Paramount's high profile experiment with Star Trek Into Darkness is anything to go by however, it isn't what we're going to get any more.

Disqus - noscript

It will be a total backfire as far as I'm concerned. I can easily get a perfect copy of a movie for "free" off of the internet so what keeps me buying the retail copy? The extras, of course. What's my incentive to spend money on a retail copy if I have to buy multiple copies of the same thing just to get the various extras? Nothing. Now, I'm not advocating piracy but are the Paramount hacks making these marketing decisions thinking clearly?

I hear people are canceling their pre-sales all over the place, the $70 us 'special' with the vanilla disk and plastic Phaser, has had about 70% cancellation on Amazon. As much as I want the movie. I am boycotting any kind of purchase, so both the studio and the retailers get a clear message to stop screwing over their customers! It;s the only way to make these greedy execs stop. No sales = No business.

Benedict Cumberbatch linked with The Lost City Of Z

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew9/5/2013 at 7:58AM

The mighty Benedict Cumberbatch has been linked with another film project - this one's not got spaceships in it, either...

This week's Benedict Cumberbatch casting story had centred on whether he would or wouldn't be appearing in the new Star Wars movie, that JJ Abrams is directing. The latest on that is that his representative has denied his involvement.

News now reaches us though of another project that he's potentially signing up for. It's an adaptation of David Grann's book The Lost City Of Z, a non-fiction title that was published back in 2009.

It follows a man called Fawcett - the role that Cumberbatch is being linked with - who headed into the Amazon back in 1925 on the hunt for an ancient civilization. Having clearly not watched the animated classic The Mysterious Cities Of Gold (it was 1925, in his defense), Fawcett went on the hunt for the city of El Dorado, capturing the imagination of many across the world has he did.

The movie take is being written and directed by James Gray (who made the underappreciated The Yards, amongst others), and we'll keep you posted as we hear more on it. As it stands, Cumberbatch is reportedly in talks, and hasn't signed up yet. But there's a sporting chance that he will.

There's no start date that we know of for it yet.

Avengers: Age of Ultron - 5 Stories That Could Influence the Movie

$
0
0
Odd ListMarc Buxton9/5/2013 at 9:00AM

There's still plenty of speculation to be done about Avengers: Age of Ultron, and the robotic baddie who gives the film its title. But it's always a good bet to start with the source material, so here are five classic Ultron stories that might fit the movie mold!

With Avengers: Age of Ultron gathering steam thanks to the casting of James Spader as the robotic villain, there's sure to be plenty of speculation about the direction of the film. So while fans look to the future for the next upgrade in the history of the robotic menace, Den of Geek peers into the past and focuses on the greatest Ultron stories of all time. Since the time-travelling, reality-warping comic story that bears the "Age of Ultron" name is wholly inappropriate for the big screen (at least, for now), we've got five other juicy possibilities for you!

"The Origin of Ultron" 
Avengers #54-58 (1968)
Writer: Roy Thomas Artist: John Buscema

The first time Marvel fans met the mechanical despot they did not know they were meeting Ultron. The future arch villain was hidden beneath the disguise of the Crimson Cowl and took a card from Baron Zemo’s deck by assembling a team of Masters of Evil to go against the Avengers. When the Avengers finally confront the Cowl, he shocks everyone by revealing he is not a flesh-and-blood human but a robot with a massive hate for all things organic!

Ultron was created by Hank Pym, who used his own brain patterns in the experiment, and his creation instantly developed a sci-fi Oedipus Complex, displaying very disturbing feelings for Janet Van Dyne, a.k.a. the Wasp. Ultron also grew a festering hate for his “father.” Ultron upgrades himself, giving himself number designations for each new version long before Apple thought of it, and hypnotizes Pym to forget his creation. Yes, an Oedipal, evil robot with hypnotism powers and a metal chubby for the Wasp. Comics, ladies and gentlemen!  

This all led to Ultron creating Avengers icon the Vision out of the android body of the Golden Age Human Torch who, during the course of the story, turned against his evil master and joins the Avengers. So what from this classic origin will appear in the film? Well, we know Hank Pym isn't in the film, so the odds are that Tony Stark will be the creator of Ultron. The Crimson Cowl stuff will be deleted for sure and I’m pretty sure robotic hypnotism is out, but you can bet your repulsers that the father hate stays. The Vision plays a pivotal role in Ultron’s origin, and fans are waiting for word that he will soon make his cinematic debut. If not, who can stop Ultron?

"The Bride of Ultron"
Avengers #157- 166 (1977)  
Writers: Gerry Conway, Jim Shooter 
Artists: Don Heck, Sal Buscema, George Perez, George Tuska, and John Byrne 

Things just got weirder and cooler from there. Ultron, still harboring inappropriate and disturbing feelings for the Wasp, decided he was going to make his own metallic bride and pattern her after Janet the same why he was patterned after Hank Pym. Ultron kidnaps the Wasp and once again uses his hypnotic powers to control Pym into downloading the Wasp’s thought patterns into his robotic bride. Never one to miss a literary softball, Marvel named the female robot Jocasta after Oedipus’ own wife/mother. On the surface, this is a pretty kick ass Bronze Age tale, but one only need to peer underneath to see the disturbing sexual underpinnings of this story: a machine who is unable to couple with an organic person who tries to force the essence of that being into a metal shell so the robot can have his way with her. Don’t expect to see the Wasp make an appearance in this one, but one can only hope that Whedon’s Ultron is more than just motivated by killing organics. Ultron isn't just Skynet from the Terminator films. Skynet never plotted to duplicate its creator’s wife and make sweet, oily, robot love to her. 

 

"The Ultron Imperative" 
Mighty Avengers #1-6 (2007)
Writer: Brian Michael Bendis Artist: Frank Cho

Set after the events of Marvel’s Civil War, the Mighty Avengers team needed an a-list threat to cut their teeth on. Some story beats from "The Ultron Imperative" would translate perfectly into film. For instance, Ultron hijacks Iron Man’s armor transforming it into his new body, and in a perfect bit of well-established character weirdness, Ultron’s body is now an exact robot duplicate of the Wasp! He kills Sentry’s wife, forever altering the status quo of that particular Avenger and is only defeated by Ares who sends Ultron’s disembodied consciousness into space, but not before reminding the Avengers and the readers that Ultron is the pinnacle of badassery, and can look pretty good in a tube top. 

Annihilation: Conquest (2008)
Writers: Keith Giffen, Christos Gage, Dan Abnett , Andy Lanning, Javier Grillo-Marxuach  
Artists: Kyle Hotz, Sean Chen, Timothy Green, Mike Lilly, Mike Perkins 

Yes, Ares sends Ultron’s consciousness into space during "The Ultron Imperative," but the metallic menace is not lost. Instead, he is revealed as the big bad of Marvel’s second sweeping space opera, Annihilation: Conquest. As radio waves, Ultron contacts the robotic X-Men villains, the Phalanx, and decides the directionless conquerors need a singular consciousness to lead them. Always ready to fill the role of dictator and cold-blooded killing machine, Ultron gleefully accepts the role, eventually possessing the artificial body of Adam Warlock. A rag-tag group of heroes including Star Lord, Rocket Raccoon, Drax, Gamora, Groot, Quasar, Moondragon, and the newly introduced Wraith join forces to stop Ultron. Yes, Ultron was directly responsible for assembling the Guardians of the Galaxy! It’s not too tough to envision an Avengers film where Ultron is defeated by being sent into space only to become the villain of a future Guardians sequel.

Finally we have the granddaddy of all Ultron stories:

"Ultron Unlimited" 
Avengers #19-22 (1998)
Writer: Kurt Busiek Artist: George Perez

There are some stories that just stay with you. "Ultron Unlimited" begins with Ultron destroying the entire Western Europe nation of Slorenia, transforming each horribly murdered citizen into an Ultron clone. The Avengers, shocked and exhausted from the mindless carnage around them, are pushed to the limit to defeat Ultron. The stakes never felt higher than in this classic tale as Ultron essentially becomes robot Hitler. This characterization of Ultron would follow him into each subsequent appearance. He was not the robot that desired to commit genocide to punish his “father” he is the robot that DID commit genocide, and Hank Pym had to live with it. It was one of the rare instance where the Avengers weren’t just protectors and heroes, they truly had something to “avenge.” Thor’s words, “Ultron, we would have words with thee,” as he busts through countless robot clones to finally find the monster responsible for the carnage still resonates. Just imagine that moment on a big screen. Here’s hoping Chris Hemsworth is practicing that line in front of a mirror as I type this!

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Sony Releases Kill Your Darlings Trailer With Daniel Radcliffe As Allen Ginsberg

$
0
0
TrailerTony Sokol9/5/2013 at 12:11PM

Sony Pictures Classics released the trailer for Kill Your Darlings, starring Daniel Radcliff as Allen Ginsberg

It looks like Harry Potter got a new pair of glasses. Sony Pictures Classics released the trailer for Kill Your Darlings, which casts Daniel Radcliffe as the young Allen Ginsberg. Radcliff is still in school but he’s ditched his robes and most of his accent. Kill Your Darlings is based on the true story of the 1944 murder of David Kammerer and Allen Ginsberg’s connection to it.

The Kill Your Darlings trailer looks like a romantic, gay, coming-of-age murder mystery. Set in the forties, Radcliffe’s Ginsberg is a questioning student who can’t catch a football. He’s involved with one of those people he really shouldn’t be involved with and doesn’t heed the warnings. Kill Your Darlings looks like it has the whole Columbia University literary gang that changed the way people wrote without writing a word.

Kill Your Darlings was directed by John Krokidas and also features Ben Foster as William Burroughs (I’d recognize that voice anywhere), Jack Huston as Jack Kerouac, Michael C. Hall as David Kammerer, Dane DeHaan as Kimmerer’s killer, Lucien Carr and Elizabeth Olsen.

Kill Your Darlings premiered at Sundance and the producers hope it might spark a “Beat Generation” revival. Radcliffe told reporters "There's a tendency to really hold these guys up on pedestals as they became giants of American literature, and there's a tendency to be, I think reverential toward them. That's not what we were interested in doing. We were interested in showing them just running around having a great time in New York when they all first met."

Kill Your Darlings will hit theaters on Oct. 18.

SOURCE: THR

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Jack Nicholson Not Exactly Retiring After All

$
0
0
NewsJim Knipfel9/5/2013 at 12:35PM

But maybe the 76-year-old Hollywood legend SHOULD retire...

Noting that he hadn’t made a movie in three years, yesterday Radarmagazine reported, in a small piece based on unsubstantiated and unattributed third-party information, that Jack Nicholson was stepping away from the big screen for good, due to his fast-deteriorating short term memory. If true, it would mean Nicholson would join the ranks of other aging and increasingly forgetful actors like Gene Hackman and Sean Connery, both of whom chose to quietly retire from the acting business with their dignity still intact.

Despite the shaky nature of the source info, the story went viral, picked up by virtually every major news outlet in the country without question. It took nearly 24 hours before anyone bothered to, you know, ask Nicholson’s people about this.

When someone finally did, the response from the Nicholson camp was that the rumors were “just plain kooky.”

Gotta admit, though, that I found the denial a little disappointing. When I first heard the rumor yesterday, I reacted more than anything with a sense of relief. Can’t say as I would have blamed him if he was calling it quits. In fact I can’t say as I would’ve blamed him had he retired 25 years ago.

Nicholson has had one of the strangest and most respected careers in Hollywood history, beginning with a long string of films at American International, where he appeared in crime films, goofy comedies, existential Westerns and low-budget horror films before establishing his countercultural cred with biker and drug films. Then in 1969 he drove the nail home and cracked it big with Easy Rider. After that it was on to American classics like Five Easy Pieces, Chinatown, Cuckoo’s Nest, The King of Marvin Gardens, hell, from the late ‘60s to the late ‘70s his filmography is a jaw-dropping collection of remarkable performances in amazing films, and along the way he worked with every great living director imaginable, from Kubrick and John Huston to Antonioni, Ken Russell, Roger Corman and Roman Polanski. He even tried his hand at directing himself, with the Vietnam-era college basketball drama Drive, He Said, and the baffling and insane Monkees feature, Head.

Both on and offscreen he was the coolest of hepcats, moving through the world with a sly grace, able somehow to maintain his solid countercultural icon status while at the same time winning the fawning, slobbering respect of the usually braindead Hollywood establishment.

Then came his leering, over the top performance in Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining. I still love that performance, but somehow after that everything changed. By 1979 he’d already proven everything he needed to prove, and after “Heeeere’s Johnny!” he began the slide into self-parody. He stopped being an actor and became simply Jack Nicholson. It seemed all anyone wanted him to do was reprise his Jack Torrance shtick, and he seemed happy to oblige, flapping his arms and bugging his eyes. Oh, there were a few scattered great roles after that, like his turn as a Depression-era bum in the brilliant Ironweed and his quiet, even sinister take on Eugene O’Neill in Reds, but those are mostly long forgotten now, buried beneath all his howling and hamming in crap like The Witches of Eastwick, Batman, and lord help us all, Wolf.

By the late ‘90s it was as if he’d given up altogether. He even left the cartoon Jack Nicholson behind for the most part, shuffling through lackluster films simply as himself— a pudgy, aging beatnik who didn’t need to prove a damn thing to anyone, and didn’t feel much like trying. His performances were still praised, but I always wondered why. It seemed he was being praised simply for being Jack Nicholson, because he sure wasn’t doing much of anything else. Granted, being Jack Nicholson was still pretty fucking cool by anyone’s standards, but he wasn’t turning out films like The Passenger and The Last Detail anymore—he was in lazy romantic comedies and, lord help us again, Anger Management. Even his Whitey Bulger doppelganger in The Departedseemed a tired walk-through.

Even if I haven’t given a rat’s ass for much of anything he’s done these last 25 years (I’ll give him up through Ironweed), I still have the greatest respect for him, and always will. He’s Jack Nicholson, for godsakes, and it’s not like he’s going to be remembered for As Good as It Gets. Part of me would like to think that maybe, just maybe, he hasn’t made a film in three years simply because he was tired of making such useless crap. He’s always been cool enough and independent enough to make a decision like that, right?

Still, even if his memory is sharp as ever (in spite of his well-documented history of youthful experimentation), maybe he really should consider following the honorable and respectable examples of Cagney and Cary Grant, both of whom chose to step away gracefully before the ugly whispers started. like those two, there’s no one else like Jack Nicholson, and certainly no one to replace him. If he does decide to retire, my hat’s off to him. If he makes another film just to further squash the rumors, well, I suppose I’ll hold my breath, hope for the best, and pray it’s not About Schmidt 2.

Now if someone could just convince Robert DeNiro to retire because, Christ, that’s just sad.

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Ian McKellen to Play Sherlock Holmes

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/5/2013 at 2:16PM

Sir Ian McKellen has been cast to appear as Sherlock Holmes in Bill Condon's next film. The picture shall chronicle the life of a retired Sherlock Holmes drawn back into his one unsolved case from 50 years ago.

In a pop culture landscape already filled with at least three major Sherlock Holmes (Benedict Cumberbatch, Jonny Lee Miller and Robert Downey Jr.) some may think we do not need another. However, when Sir Ian McKellen offers his services to play one of the most iconic names in literature, you say yes.
 
It has been announced that Sir Ian McKellen shall be moving into 221B Baker Street in Bill Condon’s upcoming adaptation of A Slight Trick of Mind, a novel by Mitch Cullin. According to The Hollywood Reporter, the story follows a retired Sherlock Holmes who is still haunted by the nightmares of an unsolved case from 50 years ago.
 
This will be Condon and McKellen’s first collaboration since Gods & Monsters, Condon’s fictional account about the final days of legendary filmmaker James Whale. That project netted McKellen an Oscar nomination. Currently, Condon is finishing up his Julian Assange/WikiLeaks picture (also with Cumberbatch), called The Fifth Estate. And McKellen just wrapped work on X-Men: Days of Future Past.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Disqus - noscript

Sounds neat.


First Trailer for Death of Superman Documentary

$
0
0
TrailerDavid Crow9/5/2013 at 3:10PM

The first trailer teases an interview with Nicolas Cage about the Superman movie that never was. The one in which he would have appeared in all black to fight a giant spider under Tim Burton's direction.

Months after the Kickstarter reached its requisite number, we are given our first glimpse of the documentary about Superman Lives: the most infamous failed movie launch in history.
 
After Warner Brothers in the 1990s invested millions of dollars into the picture—including on multiple screenplays with several drafts by Kevin Smith, director Tim Burton’s vision and star Nicolas Cage’s marquee name—they ended up with the only Superman movie that would ever feature its lead character all in black, not flying and fighting giant spiders (as well as a gay robot?)…It was unceremoniously scrapped, and the myth of this failure has grown into legend.
 
Enter: The Death of “Superman Lives”: What Happened? This feature length documentary by Jon Schnepp, which is aiming for a 2014 summer release, will chronicle everything extensively known about the infamous turkey, and even attempt to animate several key sequences. In our first glimpse at the fan-funded project, Schnepp mainly appears to be showcasing his interview with star Nicolas Cage about the Superman that never was.
 
 
Expect more to unspool about this Hollywood horror story between now and next summer.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Tyler Perry Joins David Fincher's Gone Girl

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/5/2013 at 4:34PM

Tyler Perry has been cast alongside Ben Affleck, Rosmund Pike and Neil Patrick Harris in the new David Fincher mystery.

Another intriguing name has joined the expansive cast of David Fincher’s 2015 Gone Girl adaptation of the Gillian Flynn novel of the same name.
 
Tyler Perry, star of the many Madea movies and Alex Cross, has been cast as a defense attorney in the new film. According to Deadline,20th Century Fox just closed the deal with Perry’s representatives, and he will be joining the impressive cast of Ben Affleck, Rosmund Pike, Neil Patrick Harris, Kim Dickens and Patrick Fugit.
 
The story tells the mystifying event of a wife (Pike) disappearing on the day of her wedding anniversary without a trace. Implicated in the mystery, her husband (Affleck) will be investigated by a pair of detectives played by Dickens and Fugit.
 
The film is targeting a 2015 release.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Alan Taylor Set to Direct Next Terminator Film

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/5/2013 at 5:04PM

Thor: The Dark World and Game of Thrones director is tapped to helm the next Terminator film, which will be the start of a trilogy.

In a surprising announcement for fans, director Alan Taylor of Game of Thrones and Thor: The Dark World has been tapped by Paramount Pictures, Skydance Productions, and Annapurna Pictures to direct the next installment in the storied Terminator franchise. The news, first reported by Variety, comes as fans have been pleased with early footage from the Thor sequel. As the fifth Terminatorfilm, this is being billed as the start of a new stand-alone franchise under new leadership.
 
Taylor has had an impressive rise from the heights of premium cable epics to his first big budget blockbuster. Cutting his teeth for big-scaled production on lauded HBO programming like Rome, The Sopranos and Deadwood, Taylor became one of the leading directors and a producer for Game of Thronesduring its first two seasons. Marvel Studios has since hired him to direct Thor.

 
Laeta Kalorgridis (Shutter Island) and Patrick Lussier (Drive Angry) are also currently attached to pen the screenplay on the project.
 
The new Terminator film is scheduled to hit theaters in June 2015.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Sophie Cookson Recruited to Matthew Vaughn’s Secret Service

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/5/2013 at 6:37PM

Newcomer is cast opposite Colin Firth, Michael Caine and Samuel L. Jackson in the newest comic book adaptation from the director of Kick-Ass and X-Men: First Class.

Despite news that both Emma Watson and Bella Heathcote were considered for the role, and the rumor that Taylor Swift had been cast, we now have confirmation from Variety that relative unknown Sophie Cookson has landed the female lead in Matthew Vaughn’s upcoming action/comedy/thriller, The Secret Service.
 
Based on a graphic novel of the same name by Mark Millar and Dave Gibbons, the film takes a satirical look at the much-romanticized image related to being On Her Majesty’s Secret Service. As such, Cookson joins a sterling cast that includes Colin Firth at a James Bond-like lead, Taron Egerton as his willful nephew and protégé, as well as Michael Caine and Samuel L. Jackson.


 
Just as with Vaughn’s previous adaptation of a Mark Millar comic book, 2010’s Kick-Ass, The Secret Service is co-penned by Vaughn’s writing partner, Jane Goldman. Incidentally, this is the project that Vaughn dropped out of X-Men: Days of Future Past to direct.
 
The film is to open on November 14, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

The First Trailer for RoboCop is Here!

$
0
0
NewsMike Cecchini9/5/2013 at 8:32PM

The RoboCop reboot is coming, whether you like it or not. But the first official trailer for the film is here, and it's certainly...different.

The original RoboCopis an undisputed classic that spans genres and generations. As a result, the RoboCopreboot is going to have an exceptionally difficult time making its case to modern audiences. The first trailer from Jose Padhila's attempt to remake a movie with this kind of baggage does its very best to distance itself enough from the original to let audiences know that this isn't a traditional remake, while hitting just enough of the story beats to let us know what we're looking at. 

The trailer plays more like RoboCop: The Next Generation than it does a reboot of the 1987 film. While it's still Alex Murphy under the suit (which, we admit, looks better in motion than any of the stills we've seen let on), his origin has been changed to a more "PG-13" variety, robbing audiences of the extraordinarily brutal sequence which initially landed the original film an "X" rating. A look at the cast list indicates that "Alex Murphy" is the only familiar character in the film, further distancing itself from its roots. This may turn out to be a good thing. Or not. Does it succeed? Judge for yourself.

The appeal of Paul Verhoeven's original stems from its masterful straddling of genres: it's got as much action as any two Die Hard movies, the ultra-violent sci-fi edge of films like Aliensor The Terminator, some truly horrific moments, and just enough satire to give you a nudge without becoming so self aware that it mocks itself. The sequels never managed to approach this delicate balance, and the franchise never really took off the way it should (despite a couple of TV series, an animated cartoon, a toy line, etc). This new RoboCopcertainly looks slick enough, but ol' Robo has his work cut out for him this time.

RoboCopstars Gary Oldman, Michael Keaton, Samuel L. Jackson, and Joel Kinnaman. The film opens on February 7, 2014.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Hell Baby, Review

$
0
0
ReviewAlia Haddad9/5/2013 at 9:59PM

A trashy comedy that looks devilishly good when compared to the majority of its subgenre.

When considering Hell Baby,one must first consider its parentage. First fully coined by Scary Movie in 2000, though perhaps vaguely initiated before that by Scream, the spoof-horror (or horror-comedy) is a relatively new subgenre of the scary movie. Usually working in the context of a generic horror plot—slasher film, haunted house, demon-possessed, etc.—the spoof horror spends its time using the archetypal conventions expected with a horror film to make light of the overall situation. How very meta of this subgenre, right? What seems to be the most difficult aspect of this group is balancing the horror with the comedy. That is, at the end of the day, we are still watching horror movies, so the desire and need to scare is of primary concern; yet, there remains a rather overwhelming inability to do just that.
 
Think Scary Movie versus The Cabin in the Woods. While The Cabin in the Woods is definitely more meta than Scary Movie, in that it is a horror story inside of a larger horror story, both films are spoofs to be sure. The most telling difference between them, however, is that the former remains much sillier than its revisionist counterpart, while the latter never loses sight of it being a horror movie first and foremost. Not only does The Cabin in the Woodshave a more linear plot line that Scary Movie does, but also it contains some good old-fashioned scares between all the laughs. 
 
Thus enter Robert Ben Garant and Thomas Lennon’s Hell Baby, a spoof horror that takes on the haunted house/invading demons motif that still runs throughout so many of today’s horror films (The Conjuring anyone?). Starring Rob Corddry (Children’s Hospital), Leslie Bibb (Burning Love), Keegan Michael Key (MADtv), and Robert Ben Garant and Thomas Lennon (both of Reno 911!), Hell Baby tells the story of Jack (Coddry) and Vanessa (Bibb), an expecting couple who move into a haunted house in New Orleans. Once Vanessa becomes possessed by the demon already inhabiting their house, Jack calls upon two Vatican-based priests (Garant and Lennon) who have taken a liking to more secular habits (har-har) such as smoking, alcohol and female strippers to perform an exorcism before it is too late. Well is it too late? I suppose you will just have to see the movie to find out, but given that its title is indeed Hell Baby, you all can probably figure it out.


 
Given its spoof horror status, when judging the merits of Hell Baby, it behooves me to contextualize this in the line of horror comedies that came before it, only because as any quick perusal of IMDB will reveal that spoof horrors are not usually well received. Considering their overwhelmingly poor performances and super saturated scripts, most more than deserve that fire of critical panning. Yet, strangely in this particular contrast, the context reveals why Hell Baby holds up.
 
It is not that Hell Baby doesn’t feature the absurdity of the Scary Movie series. In fact, Hell Baby embraces this silliness. Sure, Hell Baby is nowhere close to good. True to spoof horrors, it is plagued by overacting, scattered plot tangents and awful dialogue, but those aspects are also what make it a contender for the upper-echelon of its subgenre.
 
Unlike other smiling ghouls, Hell Baby actually keeps up with the scares. I could not count the number of times the film made me jump. Even better is that those jumps came with a whole slew of laughs. Is it possible that the duo of Garant and Lennon have perfected the laugh to thrill ratio that so many spoof horrors miss? Well, “perfect” is a strong word, but they sincerely raised the classroom average for their peers.
 
Aside from creating a great balance of scares and laughs, Hell Baby, nearly on par with Anna Faris, also inhabited its overacting. Particularly noteworthy in this category is Keegan Michael Key who plays the couple’s funky next door neighbor turned squatter. Key manages to create a perfect Louisianan caricature while still hitting almost every punch line out of the park. Garant and Lennon as the two Italian priests should also not be overlooked when their accents almost rival Brad Pitt and company’s in Inglourious Basterds.

 
Overall, if you are looking for a horror comedy, then I definitely recommend Hell Baby, as it takes a regular spoof horror and amps up all that separates it into its own subgenre. But, if you tend to not like this kind of movie, then I would steer clear as its wackiness may possess you for an entirely different reason. I mean really, what Vatican priests do you know that like female strippers?
 
Den of Geek Rating: 3 out of 5 Stars
6

Warner Bros. To Remake Island of Dr. Moreau

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/5/2013 at 10:24PM

Warner Brothers is teaming up with Leonardo DiCaprio's Appian Way to remake the classic HG Wells tale, The Island of Dr. Moreau. Hemlock Grove writers Lee Shipman and Brian McGreevy have already been hired to pen the script.

One of the greatest science fiction stories of all time may soon be up for a reboot. H.G. Wells’ infamous 1896 novel, The Island of Dr. Moreau, is apparently being considered by Warner Brothers for an update despite several memorable (or infamous) incarnations from the past.
 
According to Deadline, the story which launched the 1932 classic Island of Lost Souls with Charles Laughton and Bela Lugosi, as well as the 1977 version with Burt Lancaster and Michael York, is being considered for its eco-centric timeliness. Hence, WB and Appian Way Pictures, the production company of Leonardo DiCaprio, commissioning Hemlock Grove’s Lee Shipman and Brian McGreevy to write a screenplay adaptation of it.
 
The film itself will also have to overcome the relatively recent shadow the 1996 adaptation of the book run by New Line Pictures. That film infamously starred Marlon Brando, Val Kilmer and David Thewlis. As one of Brando’s final films, the stories of him on the set are legendary.
 
The Island of Dr. Moreau is the tale of a man who accidentally ends up on a strange island where a scientist has played god by turning animals into human hybrids for his own mad dreams.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Marvel Studios and a female superhero movie

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew9/6/2013 at 8:20AM

Marvel producer Louis D'Esposito wants a female-headlined superhero movie, it seems.

Nobody is making more major superhero and comic book movies than Marvel Studios right now. The firm has effectively committed to two major movies a year, but aside from Scarlett Johansson's recurring role as Black Widow, and the evolution of Gwyneth Paltrow's character in the Iron Man films, its big screen superheroes to date have all been male. Certainly the headline ones have all been. It does seem, however, that Marvel wants to do something about that.

"There's obviously a drumbeat that is banging louder and louder that we want a female lead superhero", Marvel's Louis D'Esposito told Coming Soon. D'Esposito has directed the short Agent 47 and Agent Carter pieces for Marvel, and significantly, has produced Iron ManIron Man 2ThorCaptain America: The First Avenger and The Avengers.

"We have strong female characters in our films from Black Widow to Pepper Potts to Peggy Carter and you never know. Maybe there's an offshoot movie with one of them. Or Captain Marvel, you know?", he added.

[related article: 5 Female Marvel Superheroes Who Need Solo Films]

D'Esposito did concede that a female-led superhero movie would take time, though. "We do two films a year. To get those two films done to do them right takes a lot of work and manpower. And female-power, obviously. To add a third movie and to just put it in the slate right now is difficult. We have these next three, four, five films coming out and that's what we're really concentrating on".

Hmmm.

Arguably, there's no studio in a better position to put a woman front and center of a major superhero movie right now, and why the studio would need to add a third movie to its slate in a year to accomodate that is a puzzle. Marvel's slate is known through to the end of 2015, when Edgar Wright's Ant-Man is coming out. Might it be too much to hope that, in 2016, the studio that's proven it's willing to go its own way rather than follow what experts tell them about the market can have the confidence and courage to really go for a female-led superhero movie? Ideally one without Halle Berry in bondage gear? We wait and see.

The interview with Coming Soon is here.

 

Disqus - noscript

I'll take a wonder woman movie over a Marvel pepper pots or black widow any day.
A Ms Marvel sounds like it can stand on it's own more then Natasha Romanov one lol

Scarlett Johansson is all wrong for the Black Widow.

For the Black Widow it isn't wrong. Too short and not athletic looking enough.

Top 50 scenery chewing acting moments

$
0
0
FeatureNP Horton9/6/2013 at 8:27AM

Can a performance ever be too loud and intense? Absolutely not - and here are 50 top scenery-chewing acting moments to prove it...

The grand tradition of scenery chewing is vital for cinema. Whether it’s the most over-the-top acting, a performance of genuine talent and ability, or something truly awful, scenery chewing is a broad church. In this list you’ll find all of the above – a performance qualifies as scenery chewing if the actor is demonstrating to you that they are acting, and that you need to feel the power of their acting.It’s amazing stuff, and all of our favourite thespians are guilty of it, even during what are considered their best performances. So enjoy the below, and suggest some more below..

50. Christopher Lee – Count Dracula (1970)

Let’s start with a man who's chewed scenery with aplomb for decades. Whether as the Prince of Darkness, Scaramanga, Count Dooku, or Saruman, Lee has imbued all his roles with a power that only the very finest can achieve. He has two lines in the above clip, but that’s the only two lines you’ll care about. Which really, is what scenery chewing should be about – making an impression and making sure everyone else knows you’re acting your socks off.

49. Crispin Glover – River’s Edge (1986)

For a large part of my life, I only really knew Crispin Glover as mild-mannered George McFly. So it came as a surprise when I first saw his infamous Letterman interviews, and then followed that up by checking out his song Clowny Clown Clown (watch it here if you dare). It was then I knew this man was a special talent, and luckily I was rewarded after I discovered this bravura performance in River’s Edge. Thank you, Crispin.

48. Ashton Kutcher – The Butterfly Effect (2004)

Ashton Kutcher is definitely one to watch in the years to come. I hear whispers of a good performance as Steve Jobs in Jobs, and coupled with his obvious ability to over-act when needed, it suggests that he’ll probably get some sort of Oscar nomination in a few years' time. But the important thing to remember is to start young. You must practice your scenery chewing in order to hone it into something beautiful. This is a good start, but it’s only a start.

47. David Caruso – CSI: Miami (2002-2012)

This man was paid to just utter endlessly shit one liners at the end of every show. He made a genuine living from scenery chewing week in week out. How can you not respect that? It’s incredible. Oh Caruso, I like that you knew better than to attempt anything else.

46. Donald Pleasance - You Only Live Twice (1967)

Well how can we not have the ultimate Bond villain? Every line he delivers oozes a theatrical menace, and even with his limited screen-time you know he’s the biggest bad there’s ever going to be in the Bond universe. Which is pretty incredible when you think about it. Although portrayed by several actors over the years, it is Donald Pleasance’s perfectly pitched OTT performance that wins the day and earns him a spot on this list.

45. Johnny Depp – Charlie And The Chocolate Factory (2005)

Sometimes, scenery chewing just results in something terrible. Here’s a prime example of that. Depp was clearly going for ‘wacky’, but sadly his shtick in Tim Burton movies started to wear thin at exactly this point. No amount of zany posturing from an increasingly manic eyed Depp could help what was an actor struggling to find a performance in an over-acting role. Full marks for trying Johnny, but come back next time.

44. Quentin Tarantino – Django Unchained (2012)

I had an absolute blast with Django Unchained. Some may point out that it’s a little too long, and they’d have a point. It also doesn’t make a whole lot of sense on closer inspection (just why did they need such an elaborate plan to rescue Broomhilda? Hmm, maybe I should have put this in my plot holes article…) but for pure enjoyment it’s hard to beat.However, one small bit of scenery chewing had me baffled, although it’s hard to forget. And that’s Tarantino’s bizarre turn as the LeQuint Dickey Mining Co employee. It’s a performance that’s so at odds with everybody else I’m not entirely sure what’s going on. Is he meant to be that bad? Where the hell is that accent from? Is he purposely trolling us? This scene above sadly cuts off most of his lines, so it’s well worth getting a hold of the full film and checking it out.

43. Hayden Christensen – Star Wars Episode II: Attack Of The Clones (2002)

Reading the list of actors who auditioned for Anakin is a bit like being told, ‘here’s what you could have won’ after missing out on the main prize in a game show. Poor Hayden, hamstrung by both a lack of decent script and poor direction, he nevertheless still failed to convincingly sell Anakin’s turn to the Dark Side, leaving you annoyed that Darth Vader was such a snotty little kid. But it wasn’t for lack of trying, whether he "Wishes he could wish away his feelings" (my personal most hated line in the film) or getting really, really angry about murdering sand people – a scene that on paper read powerfully, but here, not so much.

42. Colin Farrell – Alexander (2004)

Maybe it was the blonde wig. Maybe it was the unadulterated Irish accent. Whatever it was, it’s ensured that Colin Farrell’s magnificently barmy performance as Alexander the Great was always going to be a focal point of Oliver Stone’s misfiring epic. He literally gives it his all, and it’s a valiant effort. I’ve always had time for Farrell. But this was never the right role for him, and no matter how much scenery chewing he does, he was never going to be great. Ha, did you see what I did there?

41. Tom Hanks – Forrest Gump (1994)

Tom Hanks took an unusual tack when portraying the simple Forrest Gump in Robert Zemeckis’ well loved movie. If he’s not doing an almost comedy southern accent, he’s spitting out metaphors for life, saving lives, meeting famous people and changing history, and just being Forrest. It’s a role which required Hanks to go big, otherwise it wouldn’t have worked. It verges on the border of being heartfelt and believable, and ridiculous and slightly offensive. Which is just what all good scenery chewing should aspire to be.

40. Elizabeth Taylor – Who’s Afraid Of Virginia Woolf? (1962)

Lost among all the talk and tales of her personal life is the fact that Dame Elizabeth was an absolutely superb actress, who could lift any scene and more than match the magnetism of Richard Burton as they sparked off each other. Key to this was her ability to turn a script into something more than words being recited. That wasn’t enough for her - everything had to be more. Even if it’s just seeing someone’s place for the first time and eating a bit of chicken, she’s decided that it’s going to be the most intense chicken eating ever.

39. Michael Shannon – Premium Rush (2012)

I was late to the Premium Rush party. It’s the type of film that truly belongs in the 90s, and not just for its weirdly out-of-date cycle courier hero. In fact, I didn’t even know that Michael Shannon was in it. So imagine my surprise when he popped up, as a truly bonkers baddie. This was the same guy who’d be quietly rising to character acting prominence and known for his ‘serious’ roles (see Take Shelter for a superb example of this). But here he was, being an absolute loon. My favourite part is the ambulance sequence, with his brilliant laugh. Sadly though, finding clips online is a bit tricky – so instead here’s the NYC car chase. Shannon gets a few good bits in it though, and you can see why Zack Snyder thought he’s make the perfect General Zod – a role made for scenery chewing.

38. Marlon Brando – The Island Of Dr Moreau (1996)

It was a real toss-up between young Brando and old Brando. Young Brando showed his scenery-chewing class in A Streetcar Named Desire, stealing every scene before it was cool to do so. But the trouble with it is that the performance hovers too close to being flawless – he pulls it back when needed to create a genuinely believable character. It would take until old Brando before he could fully unleash his true over-acting power – with the incredible Island Of Dr Moreau providing a final curtain call on his talent. Here he is being savaged by his out of control beast-men.

37. Cate Blanchett – Lord Of The Rings Trilogy (2001-2003)

I didn’t think Cate Blanchett had it in her. She always seemed so nice. So colour me surprised when she produced this epic performance as Galadriel. Of course we should have seen it coming – you can’t exactly play an immortal elf queen who’s seen world shattering wars without being a bit over-the-top. But she knows exactly when to chew the scenery and when to pull back. Her temptation by the ring scene is almost comical, which is exactly what the best scenery chewing should be. Almost too much, but just enough to leave you impressed.

36. James Stewart – Harvey (1950)

How can you convincingly portray a man whose best friend is an imaginary giant rabbit? By dialling up your acting several notches. Jimmy Stewart was never an actor to be afraid of a role, but in Harvey he attacks what should have been an impossible task with gusto. It’s sheer brilliance, and one of the finest pieces of acting in cinematic history, but there’s no getting away from the fact that he’s chewing the scenery a bit on order to sell the concept of the rabbit as a real character.

35. Jeff Bridges – Iron Man (2008)

Jeff Bridges is best loved for his under-acting masterclass as The Dude. It’s an iconic role, and shows just how much you can do by not doing much. However, maybe he felt a little left out when he saw how much scenery was getting chewed up by his compatriots. And is it just a coincidence that he finally won his Oscar after letting loose in Iron Man, and screaming about Tony Stark building an Arc Reactor in a cave? No, I think not. Proof positive that we love over-acting. In fact we demand it in our best.

34. Gerard Butler – 300 (2007)

"Hey Gerard, we need you to play Leonidas, the King of Sparta. Just one thing though, we need you to basically roar your entire way through the film. Sound good?" Sounds amazing.

33. Anthony Hopkins – The Silence Of The Lambs (1991)

He’s on-screen for an apparent 16 minutes (although please feel free to correct me) and won an Oscar for his troubles. It’s held up as the greatest villainous performance in the history of cinema. Yet in reality, it’s just a huge exercise in scenery chewing. Oh yes, it’s scenery chewing of the highest order, but watch Hopkins gobble up all that script - yum, yum, yum. It’s skills he would later demonstrate in Thor, as the mighty Odin, but here his talents lie in darkness. Enjoy.

32. John Travolta – Battlefield Earth (2000)

Simply magnificent. He really believed in this film, and that makes this bit of acting all the more impressive. He was trained to conquer galaxies while you were still learning to spell your name by the way.

31. Jennifer Jason Leigh – Single White Female (1992)

Now this is the type of brilliantly unhinged performance I can get behind. In fact it made the film so well known, that the term single white female entered popular culture to mean crazy psycho stalker. Jennifer Jason Leigh is purely responsible for this, with her wild eyed threats, accusations, and sobbing remorse all in one scene. She’s acting for all she’s worth, and it’s beautiful to behold.

30. Matthew McConaughey – Magic Mike (2012)

Now he’s been fully rehabilitated as a movie star in recent years, and will headline Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar, it’s clear to see that we were fools for not appreciating the scenery chewing of Matthew McConaughey over the years. He wasn’t just a bad actor; he was in fact just acting on a totally different level to his fellow thespians. But finally proof was delivered to us in Magic Mike, as he grabs the throat of the film with a truly outrageous execution of a role. It’s just glorious.

29. Ian McDiarmid – Star Wars Episode III: Revenge Of The Sith (2005)

The thing I like best about the prequels (yes, I like other things too. Umm, I can’t quite remember them right now…) is that Ian McDiarmid is clearly acting in a completely different film series to everyone else. He obviously decided to disregard the notes from Lucas about stilted and restrained performances, and just go for what he felt was right – and boy does it really lift the film. Whether or not he’s cackling with evil glee, or practically winking at the camera to let us know that ‘yes, it’s me who’s the baddie!’, there’s never a moment where you don’t wish he was back on-screen. Thank goodness he wins.

28. Russell Crowe – Les Miserables (2012)

Can you call singing in a musical film scenery-chewing? Well bugger it, I have – and as it’s my list you’ll have to accept it (or call me out in the comments below). Anyway, Les Mis is a not particularly good film unfortunately, but totally rescued by Russell Crowe’s barnstorming big performance as Javert. He knew he was up against triple-threat Hugh Jackman, so decided he would out-bellow him, and anybody else, any chance he got. Spectacular work Mr Crowe.

27. Jim Carrey – Batman Forever (1995)

It’s almost too easy to put this one in here. It’s a purposely over-the-top performance in an over-the-top film. He’s wearing a green lycra suit with bright red hair. He’s Jim Carrey! However, in a long list of ‘zany’ Carrey performances, this is the one where he not only steals the film, but steals it from a desperately mugging Tommy Lee Jones as Two Face. The final act may as well just have been them too shouting in each others faces for all the notice you took of, y’know, Batman. It’s glorious, and if the Nolan bat-trilogy was missing one thing, it was a villain in a lycra suit.

26. Jeremy Irons – Dungeons & Dragons (2000)

While I’ve tried to defend scenery chewing in this article, and tried to point out that it’s often quite necessary to make what we consider an iconic performance, sometimes it’s just a well-regarded actor taking a pay cheque and putting on a pantomime level of acting as they ham it up. Here’s Jeremy Irons doing just that.

Disqus - noscript

No love for the pairing of Tommy Lee Jones and Gary Busey as the villians in Under Siege?!

So, no scenes of Raul Julia's General M. Bison from "Street Fighter"? List fail!

God I love this article.

Two glaring omissions: Eric Roberts and Malcolm McDowell

Surely there must have been room for Paul Giamatti on this list....

10 Awesome Scenes From Bad Movies

$
0
0
Top 10Gavin Jasper9/6/2013 at 9:00AM

Sometimes a bad movie can have a scene so uncharacteristically good that it'll make you wonder, "Why couldn't the rest of the movie be like this?!" Here's a look at ten diamonds in the rough.

While I didn't see the new Lone Ranger movie, the reviews I've read and word of mouth I've heard all say the same thing: the movie is a mess, but the explosive final act almost redeems it. There are a lot of movies like that. Flicks that are pretty bad, but have that one or two moments that really shine. It could be a really cool action scene, a really stylish sequence, or maybe something outright funny. Think about how Scary Movie 4 was hard to sit through, but that Saw parody intro with Shaq and Dr. Phil was kind of hilarious. Maybe how Legend of the Fist: Return of Chen Zen is a plodding bore, but the fight scenes will blow you away. Or how while the animated G.I. Joe movie was kind of average, the first four minutes were pure excellence.

I wanted to have an entry for "every single scene in Street Fighter" but my editor said that didn't make a lick of sense. Anyway, here's the Top Ten Most Awesome Scenes from Bad Movies.


10. Superman Saves the Plane
Superman Returns (2006)

Superman's been known to be the main character in some stinkers, but for my money, Superman Returns is the worst of them. It's the most misguided member of the franchise and somehow makes Superman less likeable than he was in 2013's Superman Kills Everyone: The Movie. At least we have this sequence where Lois Lane is on an airplane hooked up to a space shuttle. It goes horribly wrong and Superman proceeds to make his first public appearance in years by coming to the rescue.

This part is where the movie really comes alive, if even for a moment. The iconic theme kicks in and Superman starts it easy by tearing off the unmanned space shuttle and throwing it into space, where it won't harm anyone. Then things get hairy. Superman's in no physical peril here, but those people on the plane – which includes Lois Lane bouncing around like a pinball – are doomed. His strength doesn't give him the easy win here, as pulling on a wing only tears it apart. He uses more care to save all those people and does so in the middle of a baseball field, surrounded by cheering fans. Then Superman enters the plane and greets everyone with cheesy rhetoric about how airliners are still the safest way to travel.


9. Avengers vs. the Hulk
Ultimate Avengers (2006)

The direct-to-video animated movies Marvel used to put out weren't very good. They were 95% dull on the whole and only really became worth checking out when they did the Hulk Versus features. Even before that, Hulk was making the animated Avengers movies watchable, whether he was busting up Ultron in the future or clashing with the Avengers in the present.

Ultimate Avengers is a loose adaptation of Mark Millar and Bryan Hitch's Ultimates and one of the big differences (outside of Thor's lack of beard) is the ordering of threats. In the comic, the Ultimates fight the Hulk and later use him as an attack dog against the alien invasion. In this movie, they instead fight the aliens first and then Hulk gets a little too rowdy in the face of victory. That's when things get fun. Hulk proceeds to take on all of the Avengers, giving us such awesome moments as Hulk brutally haymakering the side of Giant Man's kneecap and Cap straight up running up to Hulk and punching him in the face, despite being thrown around like a ragdoll thrice over.

Even though the Hulk fight is everyone's favorite part of the movie, they somehow decided that Hulk needed a whopping twenty seconds of screentime in the sequel. Go figure.

8. Oh No! Country Bear Hall has Been Crushed!
The Country Bears (2002)

Country Bears is a movie I watched with great reluctance. My friend got it for me for Christmas as a gag and after a long, long time of begging off, I finally decided to give it a watch and get it over with. It's just as bad as you think. Think of the Muppets, right down to the same storyline, only without the charm. That is, unless you're talking about the movie's villain Reed Thimple, as played by Christopher Walken's hankering for a paycheck. Walken makes any scene he's in, but there's one that really takes the cake.

The story is that he's planning to destroy the Country Bears' concert hall unless they can come up with the money to save it. He's so into the idea of destroying it that we see him in his office, crushing a scale model of the building with a giant weight like something out of a cartoon. But that's not enough! He clears his desk and puts ANOTHER scale model on the table! Then that gets crushed! Rinse, repeat! This would be crazy enough, but the icing on the cake is that while he's wearing a buttoned shirt, tie and vest, he's also not wearing pants. He's just sitting around in his boxers, having the grandest time. For a minute, so was I.

7. Anakin's Killing Spree
Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones (2002)

I don't think I'm overstepping my boundaries when I say that people weren't too fond of the Star Wars prequels, especially how they turned menacing killing machine Darth Vader into a whiny rube. Despite all the mistakes of the movies, at least we got the Tusken Raider massacre in the least popular of the trilogy. Anakin went back to his home world of Tatooine to save his mother. Although she spent the last few years in happiness with a loving husband and step-children, she was kidnapped by sand people. She's been kept alive for the sake of torture and...probably some stuff that doesn't really belong in a Star Wars movie.

Anakin comes to rescue her and upon their tearful reunion, Shmi Skywalker dies in his arms. Despite criticism of Hayden Christensen's acting in these movies, he has this perfect distraught and confused "why did this have to happen?" glare on his face as she dies and once the music starts to kick in, it becomes an angry scowl. With lightsaber in hand, he stalks into the Tusken Raider camp and proceeds to decapitate two guys and slices through another, utterly pissed off. To keep from a harsher film rating, it cuts away and we hear the ghost of Qui-Gon Jinn screaming at Anakin to stop...to the point that even Yoda hears it light-years away. That totally rules. Instead of being a victim of politics and all that crap, Anakin has a total Frank Castle moment to drive him towards being a genocidal maniac and it's especially hard to blame him.

That is, until he angrily explains to Padme that he also slaughtered the women and children because they're no better than animals. That's pretty messed up. To take the movie back to mediocrity, Padme responds to this revelation with, "No, that's cool. It happens," and moves on.

6. The Burly Brawl
Matrix Reloaded (2003)

I feel that while the first Matrix stands on its own as a self-contained entity, but the second one doesn't really work because it's build-up for the third movie. Had Revolutions been good, Reloaded would have been good in retrospect. Revolutions wasn't, therefore Reloaded wasn't. Still, it had the kickass Burly Brawl fight.

Neo's doing his own A-plot stuff when Agent Smith shows up. This is rather shocking to Neo, considering he killed him at the end of the first movie. Smith plays it off as, "Whatever, I'm back. Deal with it." Turns out he has the ability to transform people and agents into copies of himself and he's been spreading through the Matrix like a virus. Unlike the others, Neo is able to resist and has a big, honking fight with his computerized rival. More and more Agent Smiths enter the fray and Neo fights them off. Using his kung fu skills, super strength and other bells and whistles of being The One, Neo holds his own. Soon there are over a hundred Smiths coming at him and even though Neo explosively shrugs off their dogpile, he still chooses to get the hell out of there. He can't destroy Smith and Smith can't keep Neo down. It's a stalemate.

Not only is it a cool fight (obvious CGI towards the end notwithstanding), but it's foreboding. Neo may master the Matrix more and more over time, but the threat of Smith is only going to get worse by the minute. The entire civilization within the Matrix is in peril. Then again, the scene also made much of Neo's following action scenes dramatically pointless because how do you expect random goons to do what a legion of the first movie's big bad couldn't?

5. Bluto Sings "I'm Mean"
Popeye (1980)

The Robin Williams Popeye movie is one of my guilty pleasures, but I cannot in good conscience call it good. It's a drab, muted cartoon world that leaves me scratching my head more often than not. One of the more memorable parts of the movie is the soundtrack by Harry Nilsson, which is just...odd. Not especially good and not especially bad, but...odd. For instance, one song features the lyrics, "Everything is meat, meat, meat! Better watch what you put on your feet!" What in the hell?

Everything comes together when Olive's family is holding a party to celebrate Olive's engagement to Bluto, who runs the town with an iron fist. Bluto – played by Paul L. Smith (who I'm pretty certain is a time-traveling Mark Henry in white-face) is steamed that Olive's flown the coup. He proceeds to grab whatever he can get his hands on and annihilates the house from the inside as all the partygoers pray for survival. All the while, Bluto sings "I'm Mean", a song that's been stuck in my head for decades. Just to give you an idea of what kind of lyrical madness was going on in Nilsson's head, here's the one and only verse:

I'm so mean that I had a dream of beating myself up!
I broke my nose!
I broke my hand!
I wrestled myself to the ground and then!
I choked myself to death and broke the choke and woke up!
AAAARGH!

A nice touch with this scene is how right before Bluto blows his top and goes on his rampage, fearsome boxer and Popeye's mid-boss for the movie Oxblood Oxheart is led away from the house by his mother because they're smart enough to know that he doesn't want any of that.

4. The First-Person Sequence
Doom (2005)

When he wants to make a joke about bad career choices, the Rock's go-to movie is Doom, and for good reason. Considered a failure, the one section of the movie that everyone seems to dig is the cheeseball first-person sequence. For five minutes, Karl Urban's Reaper sneaks through the facility and we see everything from his point of view. It becomes a pure live-action facsimile of the game's style as he constantly guns down all the zombies and demons that try to sneak up on him. He goes through a variety of weapons and fights all sorts of creatures, until taking on a scientist that mutated into a doglike beast. Using a chainsaw, Reaper makes short work of him and continues on his journey.

Really, the only thing that could have made this better was if he was constantly shouting the dialogue from the legendary Doom comic book. "YOU ARE HUGE! THAT MEANS YOU HAVE HUGE GUTS! RIP AND TEAR! DYNAMITE!"

3. Wolverine and Sabretooth Through History
X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)

I've heard of the opening minutes of X-Men Origins: Wolverine described as a broken promise. Sounds about right. After young James Howlett kills a man with his newly-grown bone claws, his half-brother Thomas (Sabretooth) tells him that they need to run off and stick together. Without dialogue, much is said through this montage as we see the two take part in various wars. The two fight valiantly on the North side of the Civil War. In the first World War, we see Sabretooth take a rifle shot to the chest and not go down. In the second World War, Wolverine is a bit unnerved when he sees Sabretooth gleefully shoot up a nest of enemy soldiers. Then in Vietnam, he has to go out of his way to keep Sabretooth from blasting everything in sight.

It's a beautiful sequence, especially with the sweet, primal way Sabretooth pounces through the battlefield. 

2. Rocky Balboa vs. Tommy Gunn
Rocky V (1990)

Rocky V is so bad that Stallone made Rocky Balboa sixteen years later just to make sure that it wasn't the final chapter. The movie is all build-up as promising, young boxer Tommy "Machine" Gunn becomes Anakin Skywalker with boxing gloves and turns on his mentor. In order to prove to the world that he's the true champion, Gunn goads Rocky into a street fight by hitting Paulie. The fight is as one-sided as you'd expect for a young world boxing champion fighting a past-his-prime has-been with brain damage. Rocky's life starts flashing before his eyes, mainly in the form of nightmarish memories.

Just when all hope seems lost, his departed trainer Mickey shows up inside his head, glaring down at him and barking orders. While everyone else sounds miles away, Rocky hears Mickey clearly. "He's no machine! I didn't hear no bell! Get up, you son of a bitch, 'cause Mickey loves you!"

To the sound of his epic theme song, Rocky gets to his feet and repeats to Gunn, "I didn't hear no bell!" The fight continues and goes all knock-down-drag-out until Rocky takes out Gunn and gets a little revenge on the Don King stand-in George Washington Duke. It takes sitting through the whole movie, but it's worth it for the pure catharsis.

1. Introducing RoboCop 2
RoboCop 2 (1990)

RoboCop 2 isn't the worst movie. I mean, it's followed by RoboCop 3, after all. It's still a huge letdown, but it has one scene in there that's absolutely perfect. It's dark, humorous, horrific and builds up our hero without even showing him. OCP notices that they're a bit short-handed on the crime-fighting front, so they try to make a newer model of RoboCop to lend a hand. Two models are brought in. Both are portrayed through stop-motion animation, which brings a perfect jarring effect.

The first one is a stocky cyborg with a hologram human face on a monitor. He proceeds to shoot two scientist bystanders, then shoots himself in the head. The second one is sleeker, but after stepping out to the audience of OCP suits, he tears his helmet off to reveal a screaming skull attached to wires and keels over.

The bigwigs are mad at the millions this cost them, but it's explained that the effect of realizing what they've become has caused the human hosts to become horrified to the point of suicide. Apparently Alex Murphy's been experiencing those feelings all this time, but he powers through because he's THAT dedicated to his duty to keep the peace and fight for justice. It's a situation that happens in comics a lot, where they have to show that the "hero" is more important than the "super" and it's showcased on the money thanks to this grotesque cyber parade.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

Great article, the Superman Returns plane scene is one of my favorite scenes ever. Matrix one is really good too, I'd also add the Merovingian fight/car chase scene from Reloaded and Superman vs Clark Kent in Superman 3.

For my money, rather than the "Anakin turns into a spree killer" in Ep2 I would have picked a fight scene in Ep1 probably best summed up simply as "Darth Maul". You know the one: Obi-Wan, Qui-Gon and one seriously bad ass spiky red dude with a lightsaber thought up by a lesbian.

BTW I loved the authors name for the the latest superman movie.

Mindless action scenes (for most of the list) from godawful movies?

With the exception of the Bluto one, they serve no purpose, are *beyond* campy and devolve into scene chewing and 'how not to write a movie 101'.

But I guess if you have to find something of value in movies that are either godawful or just not well thought out, you might as well have everything focus on the testosterone because anything else would require thought and analysis.

5 Female Marvel Superheroes Who Need Solo Films

$
0
0
NewsMike Cecchini9/6/2013 at 9:22AM

Louis D'Esposito recently made remarks indicating that a female Marvel superhero will get her own film...eventually. We've got your five likely candidates right here!

Avengers producer Louis D'Esposito (and director of the Agent Carter short film that will grace the Iron Man 3 home video release) thinks the time is right for a female superhero to take a starring role in a Marvel film. "There's obviously a drumbeat that is banging louder and louder that we want a female lead superhero" D'Esposito said. This echoes a statement made by Kevin Feige at the CapeTown Film Festival on April 30th, when he addressed the possibility of a Marvel film that would focus on a solo adventure for a female superhero. “We have a number of candidates from the comics and from the movies we’ve already made," said Feige, "It’s just a matter of finding the right storyline, the right filmmaker, the right time.”

While this wouldn't be the first time a female superhero has gotten the spotlight in a solo film, previous efforts, like 1984's Supergirl and 2005's Elektra are best forgotten. However, those films were ill-advised spin-offs of franchises that may have already been on shaky creative and critical ground, while the modern crop of Marvel movies continue to shatter box-office records and fan expectations. If ever there was a time for a female superhero to step into the spotlight, it's right now, so we've picked five who could make the jump from page to screen with little difficulty and maximum impact. While Warner Bros. is still scraping away trying (and failing) to get a Wonder Woman movie off the ground, Marvel can remain way ahead of the curve by bringing one of these women to the big screen!


BLACK WIDOW.

This one's easy. Audiences are already familiar with Scarlett Johansson's portrayal of Black Widow thanks to her supporting role in Iron Man 2 and the ass-kickings she dished out in Avengers. A Black Widow film could be less a superhero flick and more of an espionage/action thriller, complete with international intrigue, false memories, and a host of Bond-like gadgets. In other words, Black Widow: The Movie would be a little less like Iron Man and a lot more like Jason Bourne. What's more, Black Widow's solo flick could be used to flesh out the inner workings of S.H.I.E.L.D. on a scale that the upcoming Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. television show might not be able to on a TV budget. Since it looks like Black Widow will get a substantial amount of screen time in the upcoming Captain America: The Winter Soldier film, she might be ready for her own movie sooner rather than later!


LADY SIF.

If you would have told me ten years ago that Sif would make it to the big screen before Wonder Woman, I'd have laughed you right out of the room. But that was before the Marvel movie universe, and before Thor brought the realm of Asgard to the movies, and along with it, Jaimie Alexander's Lady Sif! Asgard is already established in the minds of audiences, and it looks like Asgard will be even more central to the plot of Thor: The Dark World, so there shouldn't be too much explaining to do. Sif has already stepped out on her own in the pages of Marvel's critically acclaimed Journey Into Mystery (which wouldn't be a bad title for the movie, to tell you the truth), so she's building the name recognition necessary to carry her to box-office success. If Marvel gets this one right, then WB's Wonder Woman could come off looking like a feeble attempt to cash in on the success of Lady Sif!

SHE-HULK.

Alright, terrible name aside, Jennifer Walters is a terrific character. And you know what else she's got going for her? She's already got Kevin Feige in her corner! At the same Q&A where Feige mentioned the possibility of a solo film for a female Marvel hero, and audience member shouted, "She-Hulk!" to which Feige replied, "She-Hulk would be pretty great." Shulkie is still kind of a long shot, though (although she ALMOST got a TV movie back in 1989 starring Brigitte Nielsen, but that's an article for another day). Marvel has yet to prove that ANY cinematic iteration of Hulk can be a runaway box-office success, so they might be reluctant to roll the dice on Bruce Banner's cousin. On the other hand, She-Hulk has always worked best as a somewhat irreverent character, free of the soul-searching and angst which defines her more famous male counterpart. A She-Hulk movie would have a completely unique tone if done right, and could allow audiences to see what happens when someone gets bigger, stronger, and greener...and decides they are actually better off that way. 

SPIDER-WOMAN.

Still waiting for Sony to throw those Spider-Man rights back to Marvel? Don't hold your breath. But allow me to introduce you to Jessica Drew, who (despite the similar arachnid-themed name) is anything BUT a "female Spider-Man." In fact, she's got absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Peter Parker and his crew. If ever there was a superhero completely rooted in what has built the Marvel cinematic universe, it's Spider-Woman. Brainwashed by HYDRA before rebelling and becoming an agent of S.H.I.E.L.D., Spider-Woman has a pretty standard power set consisting of super-strength and durability, but her "venom blasts" (which are like little laser beams of biokinetic energy) are something we haven't seen from any of our Marvel heroes yet. Seriously...with all of these superheroes running around, where are the people shooting laser beams out of their hands??? This is important stuff, people! A tweak or two to her origin and Jessica can show up as a minor antagonist in Black Widow's film before breaking out in time to star in her own movie. And then, of course, there's always Avengers 3, but I'm getting way ahead of myself here...

CAPTAIN MARVEL.

This is the big one. Carol Danvers was saddled with the unfortunate moniker of Ms. Marvel for decades, not to mention an equally unfortunate skimpy costume. That all came to an end in 2012, when she took over the "Captain Marvel" name, got her own title (brilliantly written by Kelley Sue DeConnick), and a costume makeover courtesy of Jamie McKelvie. Carol's new costume is just about the coolest new superhero design on the stands today, and would translate brilliantly to the big screen. An origin story based heavily in the Avengers' interplanetary foes, the Kree, would lend itself quite well as a starting point as Marvel builds to any of their many Avengers sequels.

Oh yeah...and her power set is unmatched. Captain Marvel can fly, manipulate energy and gravity, take and dish out all kinds of punishment, and thanks to her Air Force background, she can outwit, outsmart, and outstrategize the bad guys. Carol Danvers could probably give the cinematic version of Thor a run for his money, and in terms of raw power and physical spectacle, she'd be a perfect box-office answer to WB's Superman. As an added bonus (if you care about this sort of thing), a Captain Marvel movie would cement Marvel's hold on the "Captain Marvel" name in the public's mind once and for all. Forget Avengers 3 (or 4, or 5, or...whatever) put Joss Whedon on Captain Marvel and watch her become the most powerful superhero at the movies! And...if somebody could convince Battlestar Galactica's Katee Sackhoff to take the part, we wouldn't complain.

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

Sooooo boring, Spider-Woman, Captain Marvel, She-Hulk! Aren't there any female superheros that are not echoes of a male superhero? No one besides the Black Widow and Lady Sif deserves their own movie?! Really?!

"...and a costume makeover courtesy of Jamie McKelvie. Carol's new costume is just about the coolest new superhero design on the stands today, and would translate brilliantly to the big screen"

Are you high? That's one of the most godawful costume designs around. Particularly since her other two most well-known costumes are massively superior to this steaming turd. If she shows up in a movie then it should be either in the black outfit with the lightning bolt or the red outfit based off of Mar-Vell's suit.

"As an added bonus (if you care about this sort of thing), a Captain Marvel movie would cement Marvel's hold on the "Captain Marvel" name in the public's mind once and for all."

And no, that's NOT a good thing. That name belongs to Billy Batson, and it's always been incredibly petty on the part of Marvel Comics to keep camping that name even though every time they published a Captain Marvel series it always ended in dismal failure (Though I can't speak to this latest series).

How would you feel about it if, through some legal technicality, Superman or Batman could no longer call themselves Superman and Batman? If Kal-El had to become Ultiman and Bruce Wayne had to officially change his codename to Dark Knight because Marvel Comics snagged both names through a legal snafu and put out new characters under the names of Superman and Batman (Possibly slapping the name "Superman" on Robert Reynolds, the characters formerly known as Sentry, while introducing a new character called "Batman" who gained superpowers after being bitten by a radioactive bat)?

Because that's what they did to Captain Marvel. They stole his name and have been camping on it ever since, denying it to a 74-year-old character who once outsold Superman! That's an incredibly cheap move on the part of Marvel Comics, it's disgraceful, and it's an insult to C.C. Beck and Bill Parker, who created Captain Marvel.

OMG THANK YOU!!!!

Looks a hell of a lot like the Alan Moore version of the Miracle Man costume.

Two Words: Fearless Defenders.

A really want a Black Widow movie! She's so badass!

That's a lot of butt hurt over something 74 years old. Let it go.

And lets be fair, Sif only exists as an extension of Thor. Anyway, nobody is going to make a movie of someone who is mostly just a supporting character who got a starring role in a comic for the first time last year. And while I'd watch a Black Widow movie, she's really no superhero is she?

Interview with Insidious Chapter 2's Patrick Wilson

$
0
0
InterviewDavid Crow9/6/2013 at 12:03PM

We sit down with Patrick Wilson to discuss Insidious Chapter 2, his role in horror movies and just what exactly gets under his skin. He also confirms some new, disturbing details about The Conjuring 2.

In Insidious Chapter 2, Patrick Wilson enjoyed the job of having the most fun. If the first film was a weird, surrealist painting, dealing with New Age philosophy, astral projection, and weird concepts of purgatory and demonology, the second film is all about the dad getting to proverbially shout, “Here’s Johnny!”
 
For those who don’t recall the ending to Insidious, Josh Lambert (Wilson) saves his son from a demon in the Ether, but as a reward has his body possessed by an old woman in black who once haunted his dreams as a child. In short, after playing the victim in Chapter 1, he gets to let his hair down as a possessed ghost lady in one of his dual roles for Chapter 2.
 
What could seem like a daunting prospect for other performers (or audiences) comes as naturally as anything else for one of the more underrated leading character actors today. Making his start on Broadway in productions of The Fully Monty and Oklahoma!, Wilson transitioned to Hollywood with his Emmy nominated performance in Angels in America. He has since appeared in a slew of varied films, including The Alamo, The Phantom of the Opera, Hard Candy, Watchmen and, of course, The Conjuring.
 
We sat down with Wilson last month to discuss Insidious Chapter 2, his role in horror movies and just what exactly scares him. He even confirmed some new, disturbing details about a potential The Conjuring 2.
 
In the last few years, you’ve become one of the more trusted names in horror. Did you plan on this?
 
Patrick Wilson: Not really. It’s funny because you’re really talking about two franchises or potential franchises, but I resisted horror movies for a long time, because usually they weren’t sort of actor friendly.  I mean the ones the I loved growing up, The Shining and The Exorcist and Poltergeist, those movies were [actor friendly]. Those movies usually had great actors. It’s a certain skill set I guess too. Not to toot our own horns, but especially this movie gets very melodramatic and campy at times. Not in a bad way, but it’s heightened. So, I think it can take a certain skill set…
 
I guess it’s really because of James to be honest with you. I get offered horror movies, but I think I’m pretty tapped out here [Laughter]. I think I’m pretty good. I imagine with Conjuring there are more stories to tell. I don’t know what you do with the Lambert family after this. I think we have a nice closure.
 
Do you believe in ghosts?
 
Sure. I haven’t seen any, but I’m open. If they want to come and show their faces, sure. Anybody in here?
 
I did a lot of that kind of research for Conjuring. This is a much different beast, but in the sort of recon-research that I did, I feel like there definitely is another world or force out there. But I have never really seen anything; I’ve heard things and stuff; I’ve had some unexplained things happen, but it doesn’t freak me out. I don’t feel like the ghosts are bad. I guess they can be. Obviously. [Laughter].
 
Can you talk about your upcoming projects at all?
 
Yeah, it’s been kind of a busy year, so there’s been a ton of things that are very interesting and different. I just wrapped this movie, Stretch, this action comedy with Chris Pine and Ed Helms that Joe Carnahan directed that Jason Blum produced, actually. I did a movie with my wife and family called Ward’s Wife, a black comedy that my brother-in-law Scott Foley had written. We did this movie called North of Hell coming out that’s a very dark comedy with me and Katherine Heigl and Jordana Brewster…There’s a few in there. You’ll notice there’s no horror movies in that line-up. So, I try to vary it as much as I can.
 
Any theatre work coming up?
 
Not really. I say this all the time, but it really is true: I’m constantly looking. A lot of the reason actors leave the business is they can’t stand not knowing what their next job is. I don’t care. It will work itself out. I’ve also been very fortunate that I’ve been working a lot, but something like theatre is you just got to plan it so long in advance. It’s very hard for me to go, “Next spring, I want to do ‘so-and-so’ for eight months.” So, I’ve been looking for musicals to do. It’s very hard to find a good role in something I want to do, something I want to sit in for a while, because especially a Broadway musical, you’re going to be there for six months at least. And that’s a haul.
 
Do you look at those roles differently from film roles?
 
Well again, it’s different. I’ve shot four films in six months. I also came up doing a lot of theatre where I would do roles for a year at a time; a year and a half; eight months. And that’s fun, but that’s also doing a show for a year or six months, and also putting my kids to bed for one night a week for that time. So, I love doing theatre. I did theatre for a long time. The reason my wife and I still live here [New York City] is to do theatre. But it just takes a lot of planning.


 
This is not based on a true story like The Conjuring. How is your mindset and approach to this kind of horror movie different?
 
Because this is a fantasy in every sense of the word; because you’re talking about a fictional story. You’re not really preparing like I was on The Conjuring where you’re sifting through tapes and audiotapes, and what did he wear, what did he look like, how did he do this, let me find this story, let me find that. You’re looking at it like a biopic. Where with this, it is more about the rules of the world that we are creating, talking of James and me. Can I answer this question, can we say this, should I say that? It’s more about being present and mapping out your possession when that occurs and finding those little moments. I know we want to trick the audience a little or maybe the family, but you’re getting into what it’s like to be possessed by someone. How would they react? Okay, let’s find maybe one moment where I linger on the kid a little too long, and he just says, “What?” So maybe on first time viewing, you don’t think anything of it. Then next time through, you think, “Oh wow. Why’s he staring at him?” Those are all specific things that either I come up with or James comes up with. But it’s really about making, even in this fantasy world, trying to make some real progress in even the way I would say, “This is my room.” It is the choice of words that is very, very specific. Most people wouldn’t notice it or really wouldn’t care, but that’s the sort of stuff that I dig into.
 
This is a sequel where you’re playing the same character, but pretty much everything you’re doing is the opposite. You’re doing, by in large, the scaring, as opposed to being the scare-e. It’s got to be interesting as an actor for you, because you’re getting to do something different. With most things with “Chapter 2” at the end or “2,” you’re more or less doing what you knew worked the first time. This time, everything you knew that worked the first time isn’t your character anymore.
 
Well I think that’s the trap [as to] why there aren’t a lot of horror sequels that work very well, I guess. Or it’s just a totally different family or circumstance or whatever it is. It’s probably very similar with comedy too, because you don’t want to do the same jokes. Are you going to have the same set-up again? It’s very hard. You watch maybe The Hangover movies where it’s tough, because you have a built-in audience, so you know they’re going to enjoy it. I was there opening weekend for Hangover II. It worked here I think [in comparison] to that franchise where so much money is involved, where we still only did this in 26 days. It’s not like all of a sudden we’re given like 30 million dollars. It was still for very, very, very little, and we went out and did it. I think there is a real sort of creative freedom in that that just sort of let James and Leigh say, “Go where you want. Do what you want to do.” Because you can’t do the haunted house movie again, you know?
 
Because you’re kind of the scare-er in the movie of these little kids, how is it to work with these child actors and be the one who’s trying to murder them?
 
Well, I’ve known Ty [Simpkins] for a long time now. Ty was my son in Little Children. They’ve never seen me like this. [Laughter]. But I say I’ve known Ty, but I also keep a good distance to be honest with you. I’m a dad, so I have two boys, but it’s a fine line. I don’t want them to think I’m actually going to hurt them, but at the same moment, I want to surprise them. I don’t want to tell them exactly what I’m going to do.
 
So, that little bit of fear is good to be honest with you. And not in a child abusive way, I don’t want that! But this goes whether you work with kids on a horror movie or not, if you’re their buddy the whole time when it comes time for you to work, they’re still joking around about the joke five minutes ago, and you’re like, “Yeah, but I want to work now.” I’ve always had a great relationship with Ty, but a lot of that is “it’s time to go to work now.” Child actors are a whole other conversation, but they need to know that when they are there, they’re there to work. Even if it’s all fun and games on set, an adult can go, “Alright, you guys ready to work?” And then we get to work. Kids are still, “What we’re still joking around.” So, you’ve got to rein them in, and James is actually very good at that.
 
When I was certainly in the meat of the movie like possessed and stuff, there wasn’t a lot of chitchat before. Now afterwards, obviously, when I was all banged up and they were terrified, I’d then make sure everybody was okay.
 
That’s a part of the job.
 
You’re there to work, man [Laughter]. That’s my tagline: “I’m not here to make friends.” [Laughter].


 
What do you find scarier, The Conjuring or Insidious? Because I don’t get scared in horror movies, and The Conjuring was something else.
 
It’s very funny. For me, I agree. But a very dear friend of mine who’s seen both, totally objective, said to me, “The Conjuring was fine for me. For me, THIS [Insidious Chapter 2] freaked me out!” But I’m like this is make believe and crazy make-up. It’s very strange. A lot of it might have to do with religion. If you grow up with religion that’s part of it too, whether you believe it or not. The Conjuring sort of hits you on that level.
 
In your research for The Conjuring, did you read of any particular Ed and Lorraine cases that you could see being adapted into a movie down the line?
 
You digging for a sequel? [Laughs]. I mean we’re going to do a sequel to that. Yeah, Chad and Carey [Hayes] have come up…They said one about a case in London about two sisters that were possessed. I mean there are thousands of cases, so there may be more than one. I don’t know, I have not read a script.
 
Did you read about this case in your research?
 
About which case?
 
About the London case with two sisters.
 
Yeah…Yeah. Yeah. [Laughs]. Well if you go to The Demonologist [the Gerald Brittle book about the career and lives of Ed and Lorraine Warren], inthe latter half of that book, it gets pretty intense and insane. It’s insane.

 

Well do you agree it’s all in a person’s mind that’s taking them there?
 
Look, that’s a whole other conversation. I think the answer is probably yes. But then the flipside of that is, “Well maybe that’s what seeing a ghost is anyway?/Well, maybe that’s what being schizophrenic is?/Well maybe schizophrenic is being possessed by a demon?/No, no they’re just crazy/Well, what is crazy?/Well, maybe you’re possessed…”
 
It’s going round and round. Maybe they just need to take medication? Well, maybe. [Laughter]. The possibilities of what your brain can—We all know we use so little of our brain. And we all know that there’s another probably sense at play, whether with kids or animals or whatever can sense something, you feel something, you feel some sort of sense of danger. What is that? That’s not “I see something.” It’s you know something. I think it’s all in that sort of other sense. So, I’m not sure there’s like a full on other person standing in front of you. Maybe you’re imagining that. Maybe. But maybe there’s something.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

P-Will is highly underrated

Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>