Quantcast
Channel: Movies – Den of Geek
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live

FX Developing American Psycho TV Series

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/10/2013 at 2:50PM

FX is working on a new TV series that would follow the blood-soaked adventures of Patrick Bateman into the 21st century where he collects a new protégé. Just don't mention the ending of the original.

For all of those who wondered what happened after Patrick Bateman laughed off his final confession in the final pages of Bret Easton Ellis’ controversial novel American Psycho (or in the superior Christian Bale starring film adaptation from 2000), worry no more!
 
FX has announced that it will be adapting a SEQUEL to the original film/book as a television series, which will episodically continue the adventures of Patrick Bateman, the most bored but fascinating trader on Wall Street.
 
The project, to be written and spearheaded by Stefan Jaworski (Those Who Kill), will time jump in the narrative from the original’s glossy 1980s cityscape hell to the present day when Patrick Bateman is in his 50s and taking on a protégé to carry on his good, bloody work.
 
Reads the promo:
 
In the new drama series, iconic serial killer Patrick Bateman, now in his mid-50’s but as outrageous and lethal as ever, takes on a protégé in a sadistic social experiment who will become every bit his equal — a next generation American Psycho.
 
Now, you may be saying “but Bateman wasn’t really a serial killer in the original story, right?” Perhaps. But in a television landscape littered with them—Dexter, Hannibal, The Following, Bates Motel and FX’s own American Horror Story: Asylum—you can see why things may have changed for this new incarnation.
 
For those who missed out on the original cult classic, enjoy one of the hippest (and NSFW) scenes ever committed to celluloid:
 


Like us onFacebook and follow us onTwitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. AndGoogle+, if that's your thing!


Michael Imperioli Is Going to Make a Ghost Picture

$
0
0
NewsTony Sokol9/10/2013 at 3:12PM

Michael Imperioli to star in Foreclosure.

“Ghosts don’t move out.”

Not even if their new landlord is a former capo in a crime family.

Michael Imperioli, who saw the afterlife in his role as Christopher Moltisante on The Sopranos, and didn’t like it, is going to make a horror movie. The man who had his own fiancé whacked is going to be surrounded by dead souls in Foreclosure, a horror-thriller written and directed by Richard Ledes.

According to published reports Michael Imperioli will play a guy who goes to the house of a recently deceased relative with his son and father-in-law. The house is in poor neighborhood where most houses are now owned by the banks. Imperioli and company find something in the basement and horror ensues.

Leeds, who wrote and directed the films A Hole in One and The Caller, said "Michael Imperioli is a great actor with a deep understanding of filmmaking. Like a jazz ensemble, I can't imagine a better artist to join the two cats with whom I've had the privilege to work previously and who are back for Foreclosure: Wendell Pierce and Bill Raymond."

Michal Imperioli was last seen on HBO’s Girls, Showtime’s Californication, Detroit 1-8-7 and Life on Mars on TV. On the big screen Imperioli was in the thriller The Lovely Bones. He has already been cast in Spike Lee’s remake of Oldboy. Imperioli co-wrote the screenplay for Summer of Sam and wrote and directed The Hungry Ghosts.

Foreclosure will also feature Spencer List, Bill Raymond, Wendell Pierce, Matt Servittom Jeff Burchfield, Meital Dohan, Tristan Laurence Perez, William Stone Mahoney, David Costabile and Roger Robinson.

Foreclosure will be produced by Ged Dickersin, who made City Island. Virgil Films just bought the U.S. rights and plans to release it in the theaters and on VOD in the first-quarter of next year. The deal was announced at the Toronto Film Festival. Shooting starts next week in Queens.

SOURCE: VARIETY

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Disqus - noscript

hahahaha @ foreclosure comment...now that's funny!

G.I. Joe 3 Gets A Writer

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/10/2013 at 3:26PM

Paramount Pictures has hired Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and Snow White and the Huntsman writer Evan Daugherty to write the third G.I. Joe film.

Yo Joe, there is more franchising for you to go!
 
In a sign that Paramount Pictures was very happy with this spring’s G.I. Joe: Retalliation box office gross of $372 million (worldwide), the studio has tapped Evan Daugherty to pen the screenplay for the third G.I. Joepicture.
 
Daugherty is rising up the ranks fast at blockbuster franchising in Hollywood, having apparently impressed Paramount with his rewrite of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles earlier this year, mere months away from principal photography. He also contributed to Divergent, the latest dystopian teen future based on a YA series, as well as scripted Snow White and the Huntsman and Killing Season, the latter of which you can read our review of HERE.
 
G.I. Joe 3 will move ahead with Jon M. Chu returning to the director’s chair.
 
SOURCE: Deadline
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Step Up 5 To Be All-Star Crossover

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/10/2013 at 5:18PM

Stars Briana Evigan, Ryan Guzman, Adam Sevani, and more are returning for a supersized Step Up sequel that aims for dub-stepping team-up.

In a world where The Avengersand Fast Five prove that the one thing people love more than their favorite characters is seeing them all in the same movie, Lionsgate and Summit Entertainment have heard the call: Enter the casting announcements for the currently titled Step Up 5. If fans ever wanted to know what happened to their dub-stepping faves, look no further than the new cast for the sequel.
 
At the top of the list of characters is the return of Briana Evigan (Step Up 2 The Streets), Ryan Guzman (Step Up: Revolution) and Adam Sevani (Step Up 2 The Streets, Step Up 3D, Step Up: Revolution) as Moose.
 
However, there is a whole dance crew for those who love putting on the Ritz with familiar faces, including Misha Gabriel from Step Up: Revolution, Alyson Stoner of the original Step Up and Stephen “t’Witch” Boss (Step Up 3D).
 
The film begins production on September 19 in Vancouver and Las Vegas under the direction of Trish Sie and with a script by John Swetnam.
 
Step Up. Assemble.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Jurassic Park 4 Is Now Named Jurassic World, Gets New Date

$
0
0
NewsRobert Bernstein9/10/2013 at 11:17PM

The new Jurassic Park movie has been officially named...

The next iteration of the Jurassic Park franchise, which was under the working title of Jurassic Park 4, has received its official name: Jurassic World.

Awesome.

Now, Jurassic World has also received a new release date: June 12, 2015.  The film will be directed by Colin Trevorrow with Steven Spielberg producing.  We don't have any more information for you, as the second script is being kept well under wraps.  As always, we'll keep you posted as new information comes to light.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Disqus - noscript

Does anyone else think that the summer of 2015 might just be getting a tad bit crowded and that it will end up being a huge game of chicken and a bunch of movies will end up moving to a later date to avoid the logjam?

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales Delayed

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/11/2013 at 1:38AM

The fifth Pirates of the Caribbean movie, scheduled for a July 2015 release date, has been delayed by Disney with a likely 2016 reschedule imminent.

Despite recently giving the title Dead Men Tell No Tales to the forthcoming Pirates of the Caribbeansequel, it appears that Disney is not quite ready to set sail for the Johnny Depp vehicle.
 
Originally scheduled for a July 15, 2015 release, the fifth Pirates film would have been Disney’s third billion-dollar franchise that summer, which also still includes Star Wars and The Avengers: Age of Ultron, however plans have currently changed.
 
Expectations and rumors point to a 2016 release.
 
The previous movie in the series, Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides made over $1 billion in the worldwide box office and featured a star-studded cast that included Penelope Cruz, Geoffrey Rush and Ian McShane, as well as Depp. It is unclear who in the franchise’s rotating cast may also appear again.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

John Leguizamo to Play Pablo Escobar

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/11/2013 at 2:17AM

John Leguizamo stunned studio executives with his surprise make-up screen test, which won him the coveted role of the Colombian drug lord in the upcoming The King of Cocaine.

In a wonderful development, at least for any who have seen his one-man shows, actor John Leguizamo has landed the sought-after role of Pablo Escobar. Despite other actors, including Benecio Del Toro and Inside Llewyn Davis’Oscar Isaac, seeking the role at various points, Deadline broke the story that Colombian Leguizamo won out the part [Insert Vinne Chase joke here].
 
Entitled The King of Cocaine, the picture is to be directed by Brad Furman (The Lincoln Laywer, Runner, Runner).
 

Leguizamo, who according to press releases felt like he was born the part, comes from the country that Escobar ruled from his Medellin drug cartel until he was shot down in a cascade of bullets in 1993.
 

Apparently, Furman fought long and hard for Leguizamo to get the part, including filming the actor with his own money in a fat suit and prosthetic make-up for a screen test, which he then submitted to studio Relativity Media without revealing who was playing Escobar. The test was reportedly so impressive that it won over skeptical executives.
 

Leguizamo was previously seen this year in Kick-Ass 2 and next appears in Ridley Scott’s The Counselor.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Disqus - noscript

I don't like this choice at all. I dont think he can hack it

@ 1st thought, I would NEVER believe John could pull this off (he was the FAT CLOWN in Spawn for Christ's sake!) ... but, IF he was able to win the role by being dressed in disguise (therefore it all being based SOLELY on his ability to portray Pablo, then hey MAYBE Johns got a lil' more talent then I 1st believed)
... ... Who knows? ... I'm willingly to give it a chance now.
#AnOpenMind

Watch any of his one-man plays. HBO filmed a few of them, "Freak" and "Sexaholics." He is a fantastic actor, despite what Hollywood casting would lead you to believe.

5 convincing varieties of alien in cinema

$
0
0
Odd ListRyan Lambie9/11/2013 at 8:22AM

Sci-fi movies are full of aliens, but which ones truly convince us that we're in the presence of the other-worldly?

NB: this article contains a mild spoiler for Oblivion.

Before the science fiction genre even had a name, writers were wondering about life on alien planets. Philosophers, astronomers and dramatists were suggesting that civilisations might exist on other worlds in the 17th century, and some of the earliest pieces of movie theater - such as Georges Méliès' A Trip To The Moon (1902) - tried to imagine what those aliens might look like. But in the decades since that key silent movie, only a handful of filmmakers have successfully managed to convincingly describe what an alien life form might look or behave like, and all the terror and awe we might feel if we were to encounter one for ourselves.

These aren't necessarily films full of stunning special effects - in some cases, the aliens aren't shown on screen at all. Rather, these are alien life forms that are convincing from an ideas standpoint.

Rather than try to draw up an exhaustive list, we've instead looked at the different kinds of aliens we've seen in movies - the godlike, the bacterial, the societal, the mechanical, the animal - and how each variety has managed to convince us that we're in the presence of something truly extraterrestrial.

Unknowable intelligences

First published in 1961, Polish author Stanislaw Lem's Solaris contained perhaps the ultimate example of the unknowable alien intelligence. Adapted for the screen three times - in 1968, as a Russian TV movie, then by Andrei Tarkovsky in 1972, followed by Steven Soderbergh in 2002 - it's about the scientific investigation into the nature of the titular ocean planet. Protagonist Dr Kelvin arrives on a station orbiting Solaris to find its occupants distant and fractious; the planet appears to have some sort of supernatural effect on them, but what?

Kelvin discovers that Solaris' ocean is essentially a vast consciousness, and that it somehow has the power to read its visitors' thoughts, and render faces from their haunted past as physical reality. In the book, this discovery plays out as a procedural detective story; in Tarkovsky's adaptation, it's an operatic philosophical drama; in Soderbergh's movie, it's a tragic romance. Solaris can bend to all these interpretations because the idea at its center is so hypnotic - the ocean intelligence is so beyond our understanding that it can only communicate to us through ghosts.

That same sense of awe at the cosmos, and the unknowably intelligent beings that might be lurking somewhere in it, is all over Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey. Its aliens are not only older than us as a civilisation, but they've also used their technology to shape our fate and, ultimately, lead us to their location somewhere beyond Jupiter.

Solaris and 2001: A Space Odyssey's alien intelligences - along with Robert Zemeckis' Contact or William Eubank's 2011 indie feature, Love - are convincing because they hint at so much but show so little. The imposing black monoliths, which we see towering over apes and space explorers or tumbling through space, are unforgettable pieces of alien technology because they're so minimal - we can only guess at what they're made of or how they might work.

Shorn of silly designs or special effects, these depictions of alien life are timeless and haunting - just as primitive humans quaked in fear at the unknown power that caused thunder and lightning, so we can only shudder at the vastness of these unknowable intellects.

It's when movies try to introduce logic that this almost primal spell is broken.  Steven Spielberg's Close Encounters Of The Third Kind introduced that same feeling of cosmic awe, but his 1980 Special Edition added a concluding scene in which Richard Dreyfuss' protagonist is shown the inside of an alien space craft.

Spielberg later took this scene back out again, rightly saying that, "The inside of that mothership is the exclusive domain of the audience’s imagination". Arthur C Clarke famously said that advanced technology would be "indistinguishable from magic" - and in movies, that magic is at its most potent  when alien technology is implied rather than explicitly shown.

Horrifying diseases and parasites

In movies, the most convincing alien invaders are often the most primitive. The Andromeda Strain, based on the 1969 novel by Michael Crichton and precisely directed by Robert Wise, takes a scientific and highly compelling look at what might happen if an extraterrestrial organism spread among Earth's populace. With the alien germ wiping out all but two inhabitants of a small town in New Mexico, a group of scientists in an subway lab are in a race against time to discover the nature of the threat, which causes blood to coagulate in the veins.

Like so many of Crichton's stories, this disturbing scenario has a basis in scientific possibility. Scientists have long said that alien life may exist in simple forms somewhere in our own solar system, whether it be bacteria on comets or microorganisms on Europa. Scientists have been writing about the possibility of diseases arriving from outer space for years, and two professors even suggested that the late 90s mad cow disease epidemic could have had an extraterrestrial origin.

Stories like these, and most of all our own fear of disease and bodily invasion, are what make the alien threats in films such as The Andromeda Strain, and Invasion Of The Body Snatchers (1956) so timelessly disturbing. The 1953 British TV series The Quatermass Experiment - and its later movie adaptation, The Quatermass Xperiment - was among the first screen stories to suggest that astronauts might encounter something nasty and corrupting on their travels, with its surviving space explorer crashing back to Earth and mutating into a creature whose spores could wipe out life on our planet.

Even the creature at the center of The Thing (1982) could be counted in this category - is it an intelligent organism, or a disease-like entity that copies the minds as well as the bodies of its hosts? Whether it's strictly speaking a disease or not, The Thing's monster is so terrifying because its spread is so insidious.

These movies introduce other-worldly life forms that are theoretically plausible, can't be reasoned with, and physically affect us in horrible, unpredictable ways.

Mechanical invaders

If there's one thing that keeps would-be invaders from attacking our planet every week, it's the vastness of space itself. With scientists suggesting that even the nearest habitable planets are several light years away, only the most highly advanced civilisations would have a chance of reaching us - for its own part, NASA's currently trying to prove that it's possible to build a faster-than-light warp engine.

This brings us to a less common yet intriguing type of alien visitation in movie theater - the mechanical. Kronos, directed by B-movie maestro Kurt Neumann and released in 1957, sees a machine invade Earth to rob it of electrical energy, which it uses to grow into ever greater size. Even dropping an atom bomb on it merely makes its hulking proportions increase, until it's stomping on cities and terrorising the populace.

Kronos himself is a simple special effect, consisting of little more than two black boxes stacked on top of each other - which makes sense, given that the whole movie was shot in two weeks. In spite of this, the idea behind Kronos is a thought-provoking one - if aliens couldn't visit us in person, wouldn't they send artificially-intelligent machines to do the job instead?

The idea of an alien planet-killing machine was compelling enough to become the basis of a Star Trek: The Original Series episode 10 years later (The Doomsday Machine), and elements of it even come into play in this year's Oblivion. Stories such as these posit the idea that, if aliens do come visiting, they may take the form of AI devices rather than almond-eyed humanoids.

Unusual societies

The convincing depiction of an alien society is a difficult thing to get right, whether in books or on screen. After all, it's likely that advanced life forms on other planets would not only look nothing like us, but their culture and social structure would also be so different as to be unrecognisable.

HG Wells' The First Men In The Moon was among the first books to imagine what an extraterrestrial race might look like in its own habitat - and in Wells' mind, these lunar creatures (or Selenites) are five-foot-high, ant-like beings that lived below the Moon's surface. Arranged into a strict hierarchy, the Selenites are bred for their own specific purpose, with some physically suited to labor, for example, while others have big brains and raised as intellectuals.

The idea of aliens as social insects is one that quickly took hold in science fiction, and its usage has resulted in some of the most memorable and convincing alien societies in the movies. Although Nathan H Juran's 1964 adaptation of First Men In The Moon was a rip-roaring adventure at heart, it managed to sketch in a quite intriguing glimpse of a race of the Selenite creatures living beneath the lunar surface.

Nigel Kneale, who wrote the screenplay for the 1964 First Men In The Moon, also created the classic Quatermass And The Pit, which began as a BBC TV series in the late 1950s and was later adapted as a movie in 1967. Kneale's story, taking inspiration from Wells, suggested that Mars was once populated by a locust-like beings that had a direct hand in the evolution of humans. Although the aliens themselves are only briefly glimpsed, their devil-like silhouettes and disturbing scientific interests - such as eugenics - make them truly memorable.

Ultimately, the alien societies in movies tend to mirror our own, or provide a disturbing opposite. Where human cultures are typically individualistic, alien cultures are often a collective horde, driven by cold logic and science.

Aggressive animals

This fifth type of science fiction movie introduces an alien life form that is neither as toweringly evolved as those in Solaris or 2001, nor as basic those in The Andromeda Strain. Ridley Scott's Alien brought us what is surely the ultimate extraterrestrial creature - an entity with a thoroughly thought-through lifecycle, from parasitic origin to imposing final form. Plenty of other science fiction movies had introduced shadowy monsters before, but none had felt so real as the one designed by HR Giger for Alien.

Its growth in the stomach of the luckless Kane (John Hurt) not only created one of the great shock moments in 70s movie theater, but also accounted for the alien's humanoid stature. It looked a bit like a man because it was born from a man - something gleefully played with in Alien 3. Best of all, the alien's spooky, almost silent presence introduced so many intriguing questions that lingered after it was blown out of an escape pod airlock: just how intelligent are these starbeasts? Does their bio-mechanical anatomy hint that they're some form of artificially-created weapon?

With both Scott's direction and Giger's unforgettable design suggesting so much, it's not surprising that no other sci-fi movie has managed to create such a startling creature since. Pitch Black, this year's Riddick and even Ridley Scott's own Prometheus have introduced their own squelchy, slithering alien life forms, but none have felt quite so chillingly other-worldly as the beast in Alien.

As Ash (Ian Holm) once marvelled, "I admire its purity. Unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality..."


KISS Meets the Phantom of the Park Meets Rock ’n’ Roll High School

$
0
0
ReviewJim Knipfel9/11/2013 at 9:49AM

70s New York music scene produced more than disco movies, they also brought us rock and roll comic book heroes.

The first concert I ever saw was KISS during their Destroyer tour. My parents had seen some clips of them on the TV and were scared to death. The makeup, the costumes, the pyrotechnics, all the fire-breathing and blood-spitting had them convinced that KISS was the most wicked, demonic band on Earth (second only to Alice Cooper), and that if I went to the show I’d undoubtedly become addicted to heroin, possessed by the devil, or at the very least be kidnapped by white slavers. I didn’t bring up the rumor that KISS was actually an acronym for Knights in Satan’s Service, nor that the possibility of demonic corruption was exactly why I wanted to see the show.

Well, I went and wasn’t sold into white slavery. Afterward I couldn’t recall any of the songs they’d done, but it was a hell of a show, that’s for sure.

A few months later I heard the Ramones for the first time, and that pretty much changed everything. For some reason they scared my parents even more.

KISS and The Ramones had a lot in common. They both came out of New York in the mid-’70s. The members of both bands adopted cartoonish stage personas. They both became legends in their own time. They both scared the shit out of (or at least confused) grown-ups. And a mere nine months apart in the late ‘70s they starred in their own movies. Both films, interestingly enough, featured a cameo by famed LA disc jockey Don Steele, but that’s about where the similarities end.

Now, the idea here is not to say which band is better, or even which film is better (much). What’s interesting about watching the two movies together is noting what they seem to be saying about KISS, about The Ramones, and about the very nature of rock ’n’ roll.

A few days before Halloween 1978, NBC aired KISS Meets the Phantom of the Park (aka Attack of the Phantoms back when it was supposed to springboard a series of KISS films inspired by Marvel’s KISS comic). It was produced by Hanna-Barbera (The Flintstones, Huckleberry Hound) and directed by Gordon Hessler, who’d had a good run back in the ‘60s with the likes of The Oblong Box and Scream, Baby, Scream. KISS starred as their comic book alter-egos, or rather alter-alter-egos, meaning they each had some kind of superpower and were known by superhero names: Gene Simmons was Demon, Peter Criss was Cat Man, Ace Frehley was Space Ace, and Paul Stanley was Star Child. At least that’s what the credits say. In the film itself Paul keeps calling Ace Star Child, and nobody seems to call Paul anything. But let’s not worry about that. As the picture opens they arrive at an aging and sad amusement park where they’ve been booked to play a three-night stand. (See, they’re still the band, but they’re superheroes, too.)

Coinciding with their arrival, Abner Devereaux (the always great Anthony Zerbe), the animatronics genius who built most of the park’s attractions, is fired for being an old fuddy duddy who’s out of touch. He’s not pleased with this, and being one of those mad geniuses he decides to use the Youth of Today to wreak his vengeance on the park and all those who have done him wrong, and that includes the Youth of Today. Working in a secret underground lab deep beneath one of the rides, Devereaux has devised a means to create perfectly lifelike androids who will follow his every order. He can apparently whip these things up in a matter of minutes, too. Zerbe, as ever, takes the role seriously and in spite of its inherent silliness underplays it beautifully.

Without getting into all the turgid mechanics of the plot, let’s just say KISS Meets the Phantom is a live action comic book, filmed like an episode of Wonder Woman or Ultraman. For a comic book, though, it’s awfully slow, a bit light on action and almost completely humorless. The members of KISS seem to spend much of the film sitting around on picnic tables waiting for something to happen and trading superhero quips (“There’s Sam. Wonder what his trip is?” “His trip’s a trap.” “Then let’s trip it.”) They seem decidedly uncomfortable with the whole enterprise, possibly, as it’s been reported, because they never saw a full script and were being fed their lines moments before the cameras rolled. The general impression we’re given is that despite all the trappings they’re really nice, law-abiding fellows who mean no harm and want to make the world a better place.

Still, the park’s owners remain terrified of them, in part on account of the “bad element” and “young thugs” who come to see them (“They call themselves the KISS Army!”), and in part because the band brings in $200,000 a night so the owners don’t want to upset them in any way.

The big climax comes when Devereaux steals KISS’ magic talisman and locks the band up in a cage before sending his newly-created evil robotic KISS out to put on a show. Instead of the traditional “Rock and Roll All Night” opener, the evil robotic KISS opens the show with a new song written by Devereaux. “Rip and Destroy” goes like this:

 

    It’s time for everyone to listen good

    We’ve taken all we can stand

    You’ve got the power to rip down these walls

    it’s in the palm of your hand

    Rip rip

    Rip and destroy

In short, Devereaux has written a punk song, but a slow and ponderous one. By the time the evil robotic KISS finishes the first chorus, the audience is screaming at them to get off the stage. By the time they’ve repeated the song’s only verse three times, a few hooligans in
the audience (members of that no-good KISS Army, no doubt!) start tearing the park up. And to be honest, if they kept repeating that same plodding verse, I’d be tempted to start tearing the place up, too.

Well then the real KISS escapes, flies to the stage (!), beats up the evil robotic KISS and lets the crowd know that a message of rock ’n’ roll rebellion, no matter how drab, is a very very bad thing. Then they play their traditional song list and everyone quiets down.

The movie has a strangely downbeat ending, with Devereaux sadly walking away with his suitcase, undoubtedly contemplating a new job with Disney, or Chuck E. Cheese, or maybe just a move to Stepford. “”He created KISS to destroy KISS,” the park owner says. “But he failed.”

The same could almost be said about the film itself. Yes, it was clearly aimed at a pre-teen crowd, KISS’ primary audience at that point, so of course it had to offer up a gentle “listen to your parents and drink your milk” message, but still the film embodies the idea of opting for flash and style over any kind of substance.

Members of the band began distancing themselves from the film almost immediately, yet in interviews from around the same time they explained they were trying to put some glamour into rock ’n’ roll, that what they were doing was “better than four schlubs who need a shave wandering out on stage.”

Who knows if they were talking about The Ramones specifically, but it sure feels like it sometimes. In August of ‘79, Roger Corman’s New World Pictures released Rock ’n’ Roll High School, mostly directed by Allan Arkush (with occasional help from Joe Dante).

 

If KISS Meets the Phantom was a live action superhero comic, Rock ’n’ Roll High School is a live action cartoon. It’s loud and fast and brash and funny and stupid, filled with bad sight gags, slapstick, recurring jokes, high school film clichés pushed to absurd extremes, low-budget versions of MGM musical production numbers, and exploding mice. It’s also got a great soundtrack and an impressive cast that includes not only The Ramones, but P.J. Soles (Halloween, Stripes), Clint Howard (Gentle Ben, Evilspeak, and all of his brother’s films), Vince Van Patten, Corman vets Dick Miller, Paul Bartel, and Mary Woronov, and cameos from the likes of Grady Sutton (The Bank Dick) and Darby Crash (the soon-to-be-dead lead singer of The Germs). And for the film geek crowd, it’s a film packed with endless movie references to everything from Lassie and Harold Lloyd to Blackboard Jungle, The Girl Can’t Help It, and Preston Sturges.

 

When the evil Miss Togar (Woronov) is named the new principal of Vince Lombardi High and wages an immediate war on rock ’n’ roll, she finds herself butting heads with “Riff Randal, Rock ’n’ Roller,” (Soles), the world’s biggest Ramones fan. Meanwhile the handsome but dull as mud captain of the football team (Van Patten) can’t get a date. He’s in love with Riff, Riff’s bookish best friend is in love with him, The Ramones are coming to town, the school fixer, Eaglebauer (Howard) is trying to get everyone hooked up, and those hall monitors are completely out of control.

The dumb jokes fly, the rock ’n’ roll blasts, Togar doesn’t become any more understanding, and things escalate until finally (with The Ramones’ help), the students take over the school, carve up their permanent records with a chainsaw, and blow the place all to hell. I have never heard an audience cheer the way they did first time I saw this. Christ, if you see this as an adolescent and you don’t cheer when that school explodes, there’s something just plain wrong with you (though I imagine today cheering at that scene might well get you arrested).

It’s a goofy teenage fantasy about rebellion and sex and hating authority and violence and rock ’n’ roll and exploding mice. And in the end, police chief Dick Miller has the film’s best line: “Those Ramones are ugly...ugly people.”

So let’s summarize, shall we?

KISS Meets the Phantom of the Park was a Hanna-Barbera made-for-TV film aimed at pre-teens that aired in prime time with commercial interruptions to sell useless crap.

Rock ’n’ Roll High School was a Corman production that screened at midnight showings to crowds of rowdy stoned and drunken teens.

The supposedly nice guy members of KISS remain aloof throughout the film and never interact with their fans except when on stage. Mostly they just sit on that picnic table and trade superheroic quips. When they do interact with their fans it’s as a tool of The Man, telling the crowd that rebellion is wrong so they should just sit down in their seats and enjoy the glamour.

Ugly as they may be, The Ramones, also presented as nice guys but without superpowers, regularly interact with their fans throughout the film, even helping them trash and burn the school at the end as that evil, rebellious rock music blasts over the PA driving everyone into a giddy, lighthearted frenzy of destruction.

After the films came out, KISS remained focused on the safe, comfortable, empty style they touted in the film, and did very well as a result. They continued to fill stadiums, inspired action figures, sold millions of records and appeared on popular variety TV shows. Today they mostly play the same songs they were playing in the film at state fairs that resemble the film’s amusement park. But being clever marketers and corporate stooges they are each worth millions so who cares?

The Ramones, while certainly recognized and admired, remained essentially underground, playing smaller clubs and never selling that many records. Now they’re all dead, except for the drummers.

I’m coming to the conclusion that my parents were right all along.

KISS Meets the Phantom of the Park

Den of Geek Rating: 1.5 Out of 5 Stars

 

Rock ’n’ Roll High School

Den of Geek Rating: 4 Out of 5 Stars

 

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

8

Disqus - noscript

Good piece!

Best line exchange in KMPP:
"Hey, you can't smoke in here."
"I'll smoke you."

And I absolutely love RNRHS!

Universal Pictures’ Dracula Gets A New Title

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/11/2013 at 2:40PM

Universal Pictures has announced that the 2014 Dracula film starring Luke Evans will be retitled Dracula Untold, as it will cover the origin of how a man became a monster.

As news of Universal Pictures’ latest Dracula movie, the first joint venture of Thomas Tull’s Legendary Pictures (of The Dark Knight films and Pacific Rim), continues to heat up, even the title is changing.
 
Originally titled Dracula: Year Zero ever since it was planned as a Sam Worthington vehicle, the project is now entitled Dracula Untold. This follows on the heels that Universal is moving its release from August 2014 to October of the same year.
 
The project is set to star Luke Evans as the man who would become Vlad Tepes (Vlad the Impaler) with many supernatural flourishes expected. It is also to feature Sarah Gadon, Dominic Cooper and Samantha Barks as a confirmed form of succubus from Eastern European mythology.
 
Not counting lower budgeted sequels, this will mark Universal’s fourth major adaptation of the granddaddy of vampires. As the studio to release the first official adaptation of the Bram Stoker novel with Tod Browning’s Dracula (1931), they left their mark on the character with the most iconic interpretation of a vampire ever put on screen: Bela Lugosi. They have since remade that film and the stage play it is based on with Dracula(1979) starring Frank Langella as the bloodthirsty count and Van Helsing (2004). The less said about the last one, the better.
 
Dracula Untold rises to the big screen on October 3, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Jurassic World Test Footage Here

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/11/2013 at 3:01PM

New Pitch Teaser has leaked online that shows just the kind of tone and action Jurassic World may have!

With the recent announcement that Jurassic Park IV’s title had been changed to Jurassic World, it is not surprising that news would start trickling out about the upcoming 2015 dinosaur sequel/reboot/thing.
 
However, who would have thought we would get a leak of a “pitch teaser” meant for Universal executives of Jurassic World within merely days?
 
This is just a tease meant to convey what the scope and tone of this JP4 may be like. Indeed, Frank Marshall has expressed on Twitter that this is not necessarily an actual scene from the movie, but just a grasp of what the feature could be. With that said, enjoy:
 
 
Interesting stuff that I am sure fans will dissect at their own discretion. Given the flying action at the end of Jurassic Park III, I suppose it should not be a surprise that in the future of this universe, surfing along the Pacific coasts has become an exceedingly dangerous hobby.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Jessica Brown Findlay Takes On Frankenstein

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/11/2013 at 3:51PM

Downton Abbey star joins James McAvoy and Daniel Radcliffe in new Frankenstein adaptation slated for 2014.

20th Century Fox’sFrankenstein grows more and more intriguing as the storm rises. Already set with a remarkable cast that includes James McAvoy as Dr. Victor Frankenstein and Daniel Radcliffe as Igor, the film now adds Jessica Brown Findlay of Downton Abbey as the female lead of the project.
 
Findlay has already achieved prominence with fans of other period piece fare as the ill-fated Lady Sybil Crawley on Downton Abbey from which she made a tearful exist this year. And given the fate of Elizabeth Frankenstein, the character in Mary Shelly’s original 1818 novel upon which this Frankenstein film is based, that may be par for the course. Then again, anyone who has read the book knows that there is no Igor to be found from top to bottom (thank 1939’s Son of Frankenstein for that).
 
With Paul McGuigan set to direct, the film appears to reimagine the story as a bit of a buddy-comedy. The Hollywood Reporter reports that actor Radcliffe described the film as “about two young, brilliant guys pushing each other. Eventually one loses his morality and the other has to bring him back.”
 
Frankenstein will live on the big screen in October 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Disney to Take Theaters Under the Sea…And Possibly to a Watery Grave

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/11/2013 at 5:48PM

It is harder to find an audience in our post-social culture, but with The Little Mermaid's limited rerelease this month, Disney may be finding a new path forward...and it's a whole new world.

One of the biggest fears that has gotten under Hollywood’s skin like a transsexual sea witch in recent times is the advent of social media. The explosion of Internet culture over the last decade has created a form of competition that makes Hollywood’s 1950s disdain and snobbery toward television look downright polite. Indeed, with iPods, iPhones and iPads changing the way people communicate and amuse themselves, movie studios have felt iSlapped (especially now that tech competitors have made this technology commonplace).
 
In our new OnDemand world where audiences can literally stream 10 hours of their favorite TV show at the touch of a button (or just spend ten hours watching kittens on YouTube), how can the movie industry convince viewers to attend large dark rooms with strangers where they must sit quietly without touching their flashing mirror pockets and watch something on a non-glossy screen?
 
It is a question that studios have not yet answered, as the latest trick of 3D inflated ticket sales has achieved as much backlash in recent releases as acceptance. However, with its latest rerelease, Disney is experimenting with a new way to watch movies at the theater, and it may be Brave New World upon whose chart they have coursed.

 

Last January, Disney quietly and unceremoniously scuttled the planned wide rerelease of The Little Mermaid for this September because of the poor box office returns on Monsters Inc. and Finding Nemo’s 3D foray. We ran a piece on why Disney turning its back on the pivotal film that ushered in the Disney Renaissancewith its marriage of traditional hand-drawn artistry and Broadway optimism was a depressing shame. In retrospect, it would have been better to leave this mermaid under the sea, before the musical siren could lure possibly all of cinema to its dank watery grave. One that we may all soon find on Instagram.
 
Earlier this month, Disney proudly announced that The Little MermaidWILL return to the big screen in September, at least in select cities. However, this is less of a rerelease and more of a theatergoing experiment called Second Screen Live, upon whose concept Disney could explain better than any other:
 
 
Did you watch that? Let that sink in for a moment and then watch it again.
 
Disney is requesting viewers to bring their iPads, Kindles, iPhones or whatever other blinking touch screen contains this App to a movie theater with the intent purpose of waving it around in the dark at the big screen. Another way to put that is Hollywood may soon demand that you watch your film through the prism of your 3.5-5 inch phone screen—which still have may more color clarity on Retina Display than 3D (oh yes).
 
Of course, this is just a children’s movie, a nice time out for the whole family to watch a dancing crab avoid a persistent French archetype like it’s a UN resolution. However, it may also be the opening salvo where studios want to be part of our world. No, not the one about walking and dancing and thing-a-ma-bobs. Rather like a mermaid who just got a pair of dancing legs, Disney wants to wrap itself around the hot new trend while cinephilés like this writer bemoan from our aquatic kingdom.

 

Nonetheless, the sight of electronic glowing screens spiraling above the seats of a movie theater like wicked Siamese felines is a striking monument to the cultural shift at play. Understandably, Hollywood and any movie company who wishes to maintain a footing in theatrical release must find any path forward to connect with new audiences in an increasingly fractionalized entertainment market. However, when studios accept with resignation that it is impossible to hold a young audience’s attention for even 90 minutes with Rastafarian crustaceans, magical eels, and a Broadway ingénue belting to the cheap seats all in a brightly colorful package, how long until the same conclusion is made for blockbusters? Particularly as they continue to disappointment more and more every year, right After Earth, White House Down, The Internship, The Lone Ranger, RIPD, Smurfs 2, Paranoia, Kick-Ass 2, The Mortal Instruments and Getaway? Right!
 
This little limited engagement release could be a fluke or it could prove a far more profitable avenue than the 3D releases have for the last few years at the House of Mouse. In which case, imagine an App that lets kids play “Magic Carpet Mayhem” on their parents’ tablets while a pair of blowhards sing about “A Whole New World” for an Aladdin rerelease in the background. They clearly wouldn’t be whistling Dixie. Who needs to follow the confusing character development of a Street Rat who wants a better life or a lion cub who just wants to be king when they can compete for who spots the most cute cuddly sidekicks amongst their party of friends. Imagine the joy in the theater and all the boasts and exclamations that go with it.
 

This may be a whole new way to indoctrinate raise a generation on the classics. And hey, if that works, they may want Second Screens with their 14th Batman reboot and Sixth Marvel Phase as well! This could be the new social contract between studio and audience necessary for Hollywood to compete in our world for new affection. And even before we’ve signed it, I’m already speechless.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Interview with Leigh Whannell, Writer of Insidious and Saw

$
0
0
InterviewDavid Crow9/12/2013 at 12:32AM

We sit down with Leigh Whannell, an Australian screenwriter with the unique perspective of having penned the screenplays that launched two mega horror franchises. We discuss both, as well as his acting in both in anticipation for Insidious: Chapter 2.

Leigh Whannell is in the unique position of having co-created two of the most enduring horror franchises of the 21st century. Born and raised in Melbourne, Australia, Whannell was always unapologetically enthused by commercial filmmaking when he first worked with his creative partner James Wan. Developing the relationship of Whannell writing the screenplay and Wan directing the picture, their first feature film Saw became one of the most enduring horror icons of the 2000s, even if Whannell only wrote the first two of SIX sequels while Wan directed none of them.
 
After the Australian duo’s next horror film, Dead Silence (2007) failed to live up to expectations, each pursued other creative avenues before reuniting, refreshed and hungry, for Insidious (2011). As the most profitable film of 2011, Insidiousvitalized an entire studio, Film District, on its own accord and unlike the Sawsequels, lured its original creators back for the much-hyped sequel. It may also help that Whannell, also an actor, played the character of Specs in Insidious, a personality that faired better than his protagonist Adam did in Saw.
 
In promotion of Insidious: Chapter 2, Whannell was nice enough to chat with Den of Geek about that rollercoaster ride in Hollywood, the destiny of both franchises and what interests him as a writer and an actor.
 
Den of Geek: When you first wrote Insidious did you already have a sequel in mind?
 
Leigh Whannell: No. When I first wrote Insidious, James and I were both in a very particular place. We were stuck in a rut, I think. We’d just come out with Saw and everybody was congratulating us. It was this big success. I mean I had welts on my back from people patting me on the back. When the whole Saw thing died down, I feel like I had praise withdrawals. I had never been congratulated so much on something in my life. So, it was a really amazing whirlwind when Saw came out. Then we did Dead Silence and got our asses kicked out on that film, and it didn’t turn out to be the film we wanted it to be. And then we spent a few years just in a rut. James went off and did Death Sentence, and I was writing scripts that weren’t getting made. I think all the stories you read about Hollywood and development hell, we kind of experienced it first hand. By the time 2010 rolled around, we hadn’t made a film in a few years and we were really desperate to do something. We basically decided to go back and do Saw all over again. We wanted to go back to our roots and make an indie film just like Saw, but we didn’t want to go back and just remake Saw, so we decided to do a supernatural horror. And that’s where Insidious came from.
 
So when I was writing the film, not only was I not thinking about a sequel, I wasn’t thinking beyond the page. I was obsessed with us reestablishing who we were. I just felt like we had lost something. It had been a few years and we had all this momentum out of Saw that we had kind of lost. So, I’m really happy that Insidious did well, because it basically feels like “Saw: Take Two.”
 
DoG: Did the direction of the Saw franchise inspire James and yourself to assert more creative control over the Insidiousfranchise?
 
Whannell: Perhaps with James. I wrote two Saw sequels, I did [Saw II and Saw III] and then I stepped away and some new people came in. They made some decisions that I wouldn’t have made, but I guess that’s obvious when new people take over: the new guy who moves into your house, he is going to decorate it differently. So, that was interesting. I think for James, he was influenced by what you’re talking about. I think he watched a new team of people take something he had directed and remake it in their own vision and paint their own colors on it, and I think he did want to have a little more control. So, I think you’re probably right in that respect. For me, because I wrote two of the Saw sequels, I didn’t necessarily feel the urgency to hang onto Insidious, but I’m glad that James did.


 
DoG: One more question on Sawthen: Are you happy with the direction Dr. Gordon went?
 
Whannell: [Laughs]. Difficult stuff to talk about, because I’m still friends with people who are involved in the Sawfilms. I’ll say this: There’s definitely things that I wouldn’t have done, but I felt very divorced from it. I’ll tell you about an interesting experience that happened to me with Saw. I was driving, as you often do in LA, down Sunset, and I was pulled up at a stoplight and I was sitting there, and I looked up and there was this giant billboard for SawV. I was looking at this billboard, and I had this really palpable feeling. I was looking at this billboard and I was thinking, “My God, that franchise, that character, that title was invented in the suburbs of Melbourne on the other side of the world.” And now it’s grown into this behemoth on a billboard on Sunset Blvd., and I had nothing to do with it. So, I had this curious mixture of attachment that I created this thing and detachment that I was completely divorced from it. I didn’t visit the set; I didn’t know what the film was like. It was a really interesting feeling. I didn’t feel any malice towards it; it was just a really curious feeling of detachment from something that I created. So maybe, with Insidious there is a reluctance to step away.
 
DoG: Moving onto Insidious, it always seemed to me that you enjoy played with timelines and nonlinear timelines, especially in the Saw sequels you wrote. But now in Insidious 2, you can actually have your characters, your travelers, play around in time and space. How was that?
 
Whannell: That was awesome! [Laughs]. Yeah, you’re very right. Supernatural films allow you to bend the rules of time and space that’s really fun, especially for screenwriters who often get shot down for logic reasons. When you’re writing a supernatural film, you can always be like, “Hey, it’s supernatural.” I really enjoy the aspects of Insidious 2 where we visited the first film. I think that’s the sort of thing that fans of the first film will really love. I think they love seeing those loops that loop the films together. I think true connectivity is something that is rare in sequels. I mean I love the first Die Hard film; you won’t find a bigger Die Hard fan than me. But I feel like with the sequels, they’re just taking that character and dropping him in different scenarios. There’s no real connective tissue.  What we tried to do on Saw and what we tried to do on Insidious is try to have the films play out like they really are connected like a serial. I mean if you edited Insidious 2 against the end of Insidious 1, it’d play almost like a big movie. It’d be like a four-hour movie. So yeah, I like that.


 
DoG: Well, this Insidious is “Chapter 2,” which picks up right where the last one left off. Do you think that if there is a third one, it’d be “Chapter 3?”
 
Whannell: I don’t know. That’s an interesting question because I don’t know if we’d continue with the Lambert family. I think they’ve been hammered enough. If we were to do a sequel, I mean I haven’t really discussed it with the producer, but I almost feel like if we do another sequel to Insidious that we almost should tell a different story. I feel like this world of the Further is ripe for many different stories. So, I guess you could use that world as the basis for some other family’s story.
 
DoG: Speaking of the Further, I really love this astral plane mythology introduced in these films. Did you research that or are there are a lot of people for whom this is their spiritual belief?
 
Whannell: Yeah! I totally did a little bit of reading into it, and James and I had been talking about doing an astral projection horror film for years, even before Saw. That was actually one of the ideas we wanted to do, but we ended up doing Saw…But I remember we used to talk a lot about how astral projection hadn’t really been utilized in a horror film yet, and it’s a subject so ripe for horror films: the idea of your spirit leaving your body. And we did a bit of reading and research into it, and we found that there is this other plane that astral travelers can actually visit that sort of lives on top of our world, and it’s something that we can’t see. In your astral body you can explore this world. Then when it came time to write Insidious, I interviewed a few psychics, and they really echoed a lot of the stuff I featured in the film. One guy I was talking to…he’s a psychic and medium in LA, he was telling me about the personal experiences he had had astral projecting into this other plane and what it looked like. So that was really cool to have someone echo my own ideas back to me after the fact. I’d already written the film and then I talked to him, and he really reiterated these ideas.
 
…You can do a bit of reading online. Even if you just go to the Wikipedia page on this stuff, there’s an astral plane and there’s a thing called the Akashic Records. I think it’s called the Akashic Records, but apparently it’s a book of everything that’s happened in the world and everything that’s going to happen. Astral projectors believe if you travel far enough, you can read this book, and in fact, according to myth, Nostradamus could astral project and the reason he made all those predictions was because he was reading this book.
 
DoG: What I thought was an interesting choice in this film was the demon, which I really like you get to SEE the demon in the first movie and it was part of the marketing of that one. Here, you don’t see him in this movie, but you do hear him at the end…
 
Whannell: Right, we definitely got little references to him in there, but I think we wanted to concentrate on the old woman ghost, and explore more the character of Josh, who Patrick Wilson plays, and who he was haunted by. I think there’s really so many ghostly figures in this world of the Further, I think you can pick and choose.
 
DoG: To go further into that, you play Specs who had an expanded role in this as a bit of a ghostbuster. Any chance that he and Elise and the whole team will be going forward in the future?
 
Whannell: I think so. If we were to do a sequel, if we were to move onto another family, I think you could have those characters be the connective tissue. I think it’d also be an interesting film to do a prequel based on Elise and how she was first introduced to this world of the Further before Specs and Tucker come along.
 
DoG: Could you talk a little bit about playing Specs in these movies?
 
Whannell: Yeah, I have real fun playing Specs, and I treat it like fun. [Angus Sampson] is a good friend of mine and we basically have our schtick. I just did another film with him in Australia called The Mule, which is a film Angus and I wrote, and we shot it in Australia. We have Hugo Weaving, and it’s very different. It’s kind of a drama, almost Fargo-esque crime thriller about a drug mule. It was really interesting to act in that film, because it was so different from doing Specs and Tucker. I really felt like an actor, I was working out how this character walked and talked and smoked. I do have fun playing Specs, but weirdly enough, shooting this film in Australia has really made me want to throw myself into acting more and see where that takes me.


 
DoG: Can you talk a little about what you’re working on now?
 
Whannell: I just shot a film called Cooties that wasn’t actually my idea. I was talking to a friend of mine and he said to me, “I’ve got this friend, and he’s got an idea for a film. He wants to produce it. He’s not a writer, but it’s called Cooties. It’s about a virus that breaks out in an elementary school and turns all the kids into killer zombies.” And it was like a diamond bullet to paraphrase Apocalypse Now. I was like “I want to write that film. Who’s your friend? Call him up!”
 
So he calls up his friend and we went out to dinner, and I’m like, “That movie? I want to write that film.” And he actually said to me, “Yeah, I mean I think it could be really scary.” And I was like, “Yeah, I’m thinking of doing it as a comedy.” And he was like, “I was thinking it was more horror.” And I was like, “It’s called Cooties. Nobody is going to take it seriously! You either have to change the title and make it a serious horror film or you stick with Cooties and it has to be a comedy. And we can’t lose the title that’s one of the best things. Everyone knows what cooties are.” And I eventually convinced him, and we just wrapped shooting that on [two days ago].
 
Is there any chance James could ask you to work on The Conjuring 2?
 
Whannell: Maybe, I don’t know. I loved The Conjuring so much. It’s really scary.  I think he took everything he learned from Insidious and really put it into that film, and it’s so scary. As a horror fan, I’m thankful for that film. I don’t know. If he asked me to do it, I’d definitely be honored.
 
DoG: Well, thanks for being able to do this today.
 
Whannell: Thank you so much. Cheers, mate.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Joss Whedon on James Spader as Ultron

$
0
0
NewsGlen Chapman9/12/2013 at 7:43AM

Joss Whedon has been chatting about the decision to cast James Spader as the lead antagonist in the Avengers sequel.

The casting of James Spader as Ultron in the sequel to The Avengers, Avengers: Age of Ultron was received well for the most part, which is certainly justified given that Spader is a fine actor and Marvel has a rather decent track record when it comes to casting.

Joss Whedon has been chatting about the decision to cast Spader, here’s what he had to say. "Spader was my first and only choice. He's got that hypnotic voice that can be eerily calm and compelling, but he's also very human and humorous. Ultron is not Ha. Spader can play all of the levels. He's the guy to break The Avengers into pieces", Whedon said.

[related story: 5 Ultron Stories That Could Influence Avengers 2]

Sounds promising, obviously we’ll have to wait until the release of the movie on the 1st May 2015 to judge the success of the casting fully. Mind you, it's not going out on a limb to say that we’ll have a trailer before then to indicate the look, sound and feel of Ultron.

More on Avengers: Age of Ultron when it’s available.

Marvel Studios (Via Comingsoon)


Benedict Cumberbatch on Crimson Peak and Star Wars

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew9/12/2013 at 7:46AM

Reiterating he knows nothing about Star Wars rumours, Benedict Cumberbatch has touched on why he left Guillermo del Toro's Crimson Peak.

It's been a good week now since Benedict Cumberbatch was linked with a new movie, and it may just be that the rolodeck of Hollywood casting agents has made it past the mail 'C'. That's nothing against Cumberbatch himself, rather the seeming trend to link him with approximately 47.22% of active Hollywood productions. Give or take.

One of which, of course, was JJ Abrams' Star Wars: Episode VII. Cumberbatch's representative has denied this once, but the man himself has now given an interview to The Hollywood Reporter, where he says on a Star Wars role "I don't know. Who knows, who knows? Nothing is known of that. I worked with JJ. Obviously he knows. Everyone who wants to be part of that movie, they know about".

No change there, then. The official line is no Cumberbatch, the word from decent internet news sources is he will be in the movie. The man himself doesn't seem resistant to the idea, but then he doesn't seem to know much more about it than that.

It was a potential Star Wars role that was rumoured to be the reason why Cumberbatch dropped out of Guillermo del Toro's next movie, Crimson Peak, which the director is set to start shooting early next year. But apparently, that's not the case. "That was nothing to do with it at all", he said. "[It was] between me and Guillermo, to be honest. It was amicable, and that's all I'm going to say".

Make of that what you will. Cumberbatch's role in Crimson Peak has been taken by Tom Hiddleston, it seems. Every cloud...

The Hollywood Reporter

Fast & Furious 7 Casting Update

$
0
0
NewsRobert Bernstein9/12/2013 at 8:51AM

'Fast & Furious 7' adds some muscle to the cast...

Universal has added Djimon Hounsou to the cast of Fast & Furious 7.

Hounsou is best known for his roles in Gladiator and Blood Diamond, and has quite an impressive resume of great movies he's been involved with, including The IslandConstantine, and The Tempest.  Housou is also slated to appear in the highly anticipated Guardians of the Galaxy, and he will also be lending his voice for How to Train Your Dragon 2.

Hounsou will join a cast that includes Vin Diesel, Paul Walker, Tyrese, Dwayne Johnson, Kurt Russell, and Jason Statham.

Fast & Furious 7 is due to hit theaters July 11, 2014.

Source: DL

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Harry Potter Spinoff Movies Announced, Set in New York

$
0
0
NewsRobert Bernstein9/12/2013 at 10:43AM

Harry Potter will be getting a series of spinoff movies from Warner Bros...

Warner Bros. today announced a new film series that will be a spinoff of the incredibly popular Harry Potter series. The new series will be titled Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, based on the Potter spinoff book, which is presented as a Hogwarts book read by Harry, Hermione and Ron.

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them will be set in the same universe as the Harry Potter series, but it won't be directly connected to the story of Harry.

Author J.K. Rowling says, "Although it will be set in a worldwide community of witches and wizards where I was so happy for seventenn years, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is neither a prequel nor a sequel to the Harry Potter series, but an extension of the wizarding world. The laws and customs of the hidden magical society will be familiar to anyone who has read the Harry Potter books or seen the films, but Newt's story will start in New York, seventy years before Harry's gets underway."

(So then, technically speaking, it is a prequel to Harry Potter).

Rowling is set to write the first film, which will be based around the author of the 'Fantastic Beasts' textbook in the story, Newt Scamander. No release window has been given, but we will certainly keep you informed as new information about the Harry Potter spinoff comes to light. The full press release from Warner Bros. follows: 

 (September 12, 2013 – Burbank, CA and London, U.K.) – Warner Bros. Entertainment today announced an expanded creative partnership with world-renowned, best-selling author J.K. Rowling. At the center of the partnership is a new film series from Rowling’s world of witches and wizards, inspired by Harry Potter’s Hogwarts textbook “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them” and the adventures of the book’s fictitious author, Newt Scamander. The announcement was made by Kevin Tsujihara, Chief Executive Officer, Warner Bros. Entertainment.

“Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them” will be an original story and will mark Rowling’s screenwriting debut. It is planned as the first picture in a new film series. Set in the wizarding world, the story will feature magical creatures and characters, some of which will be familiar to devoted Harry Potter fans.

“Although it will be set in the worldwide community of witches and wizards where I was so happy for seventeen years, ‘Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them’ is neither a prequel nor a sequel to the Harry Potter series, but an extension of the wizarding world,” said Rowling. “The laws and customs of the hidden magical society will be familiar to anyone who has read the Harry Potter books or seen the films, but Newt’s story will start in New York, seventy years before Harry’s gets underway.” (Expanded Rowling quote at bottom of release.)

“We are incredibly honored that Jo has chosen to partner with Warner Bros. on this exciting new exploration of the world of wizardry which has been tremendously successful across all of our businesses,” said Tsujihara. “She is an extraordinary writer, who ignited a reading revolution around the world, which then became an unprecedented film phenomenon. We know that audiences will be as excited as we are to see what her brilliant and boundless imagination conjures up for us.”

In addition to the film series, “Fantastic Beasts” will also be developed across the Studio’s video game, consumer products and digital initiatives businesses, including enhanced links with Pottermore.com, Rowling’s digital online experience built around the Harry Potter stories.

The Studio’s expanded partnership with Rowling also covers the continued expansion of its Harry Potter activities, including the wonderful Wizarding World of Harry Potter theme parks in conjunction with partner Universal Parks and Resorts (currently in Orlando, FL; opening in Hollywood, CA and Osaka, Japan), digital initiatives (including Pottermore), video games, consumer products and visitor attractions.

In addition, Warner Bros. will serve as the worldwide TV distributor (excluding the U.K.) of J.K. Rowling’s upcoming television adaptation for the BBC of “The Casual Vacancy,” Rowling’s best-selling first novel aimed at adult audiences. This miniseries begins production in 2014.

The relationship will be managed in London by Neil Blair of The Blair Partnership, Rowling’s literary agency, and Josh Berger, President & Managing Director, Warner Bros. U.K., Ireland and Spain, who will serve as Warner Bros.’ chief business contact for all J.K. Rowling initiatives going forward.

Rowling’s expanded quote regarding “Fantastic Beasts” is below:

“It all started when Warner Bros. came to me with the suggestion of turning ‘Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them’ into a film. I thought it was a fun idea, but the idea of seeing Newt Scamander, the supposed author of ‘Fantastic Beasts,’ realized by another writer was difficult. Having lived for so long in my fictional universe, I feel very protective of it and I already knew a lot about Newt. As hard-core Harry Potter fans will know, I liked him so much that I even married his grandson, Rolf, to one of my favourite characters from the Harry Potter series, Luna Lovegood.

As I considered Warners’ proposal, an idea took shape that I couldn’t dislodge. That is how I ended up pitching my own idea for a film to Warner Bros.

Although it will be set in the worldwide community of witches and wizards where I was so happy for seventeen years, ‘Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them’ is neither a prequel nor a sequel to the Harry Potter series, but an extension of the wizarding world. The laws and customs of the hidden magical society will be familiar to anyone who has read the Harry Potter books or seen the films, but Newt’s story will start in New York, seventy years before Harry’s gets underway.

I particularly want to thank Kevin Tsujihara of Warner Bros. for his support in this project, which would not have happened without him. I always said that I would only revisit the wizarding world if I had an idea that I was really excited about and this is it.”

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Insidious: Chapter 2, Review

$
0
0
ReviewDavid Crow9/12/2013 at 1:38PM

The second Insidious film boldly avoids repeating the first film in every way. Unfortunately those differences include quality as well.

The difficulty with most horror sequels is how do you scare the audience a second time when they know what’s coming? Often, this question is skirted by less discerning producers and filmmakers who are frequently dealing with material that’s hardly frightening to begin with. Should they really care if necking teenagers are terrified of Jason Voorhees and his desperately compensating machete? Here’s the gore, here’s the nudity, thanks for the ten bucks.
 
To Insidious: Chapter 2’s credit, it completely ignores that lazily successful business model. Unlike most horror follow-ups, nearly everyone came back for the Insidious sequel. Director James Wan and writer Leigh Whannell are back; stars Patrick Wilson and Rose Byrne returned; even Lin Shaye’s ghost whisperer has been exhumed, and that’s impressive considering she died in the original’s closing minutes. Yet despite the same creative team as the first film, Insidious: Chapter 2 is boldly dissimilar to that flick in one too many ways: Namely quality.
 
Despite having “Chapter 2” in the title, this sequel kickoffs as more of a prequel. Set in the 1980s, we are reintroduced to Lorraine Lambert and Elise Rainer. Played in the previous film, and for much of this installment, by Barbara Hershey and Lin Shaye, respectively, they have taken on the guise of Jocelin Donahue and Lindsay Seim for this sequence. Quickly, audiences are brought up to speed on the haunting of Lorraine’s son, Josh Lambert. Previously seen as an emotionally repressed father (Patrick Wilson), he is now a scared little boy tormented by visions of on an old crone in black coming to him in his dreams. But the real horror is that every time his mother takes his picture, she too can see the woman in black…and in each photograph she is getting closer.


 
With hypnotism, Elise represses Josh’s ability to astral project and the spectral parasite dissipates…until we jump cut to the present where adult Josh has finally projected into “the Further” (New Age Purgatory) to save his son’s soul from a demon. Unfortunately, that same old lady beat Josh back to his body, just in time to strangle an aged Elise to death in the original film’s final moments and…
 
It turns out not a whole lot of blowback for such a decidedly definitive conclusion. As possessed Josh is easily able to talk his way out of killing Elise to his wife Renai (Rose Byrne) and son Dalton (Ty Simpkins), in spite of the fact that Renai has photographic proof that Josh is possessed, he soon even convinces the police someone else did the strangulations. Indeed, we get a thorough background on whom that someone is. With the help of Ghost Elise, the first film’s comic relief of Specs and Tucker (series writer Whannell and Angus Sampson) slowly, and with much slapstick, discover that the woman in black is a Norman Bates wannabe. Named Parker Crane (Tom Fitzpatrick), he/she was the cross-dressing servant of a mommy dearest with a taste for serial killing.
 
This demystification of what was the first film’s creepiest image is more than a bit disappointing, but so too is the new approach to the horror in the Lambert house. After Renai’s son and Lorraine’s grandson spent three months in a coma directly prior to Insidious: Chapter 2, they gallop swiftly back into forced domestic tranquility, if only for the horror machinations to smoothly churn once more. There is a wonderful understatement in Byrne’s performance that shows her acknowledging something is wrong, but she suppresses it for husband in the immediacy, her family’s stability in the long-term and the plot’s forced expediency for the running time. The old haunted house gags return briefly, but only in service of padding the scares until the film’s ultimate conflict, one between crazed father and family.


 
Wilson gets to have the most fun as possessed Josh, because while all the others must rediscover how much they fear ghosts, he is already deep into that territory and enjoying it. While the first relied on heavily surrealist imagery from the haunting Further for its scares, complete with a demon and Norman Rockwell paintings from Hell, the sequel feels more comfortably rooted in The Shining territory: Ghost dad has an axe (or in this case a bat) and needs to be put down. The unique visions of Undead limbo are replaced by a comfortable threat, which is the last thing desired in a horror film.
 
However, there is some benefit to this approach. It is quickly discovered that one of the many ghosts still haunting the poor Lamberts is in fact not a ghost at all, but father Josh trapped in the Further. If Wan and Whannell already displayed a penchant for playing with nonlinear timelines in the Saw films they had a hand in, they really get to run wild in the astral Further where Josh not only travels space, but he also travails his own timeline by returning to the aforementioned prequel sequence, and even some of the more confounding bits of the first film.
 
It is a nifty trick that is aided a great deal by the return of Shaye as a spirited Elise—she alternates between helping Josh and guiding Specs, Tucker, and an old colleague named Carl (Steven Coulter) through the history of Parker Crane. It also admirably avoids any of the relatively iconic money-shots of the Demon from Insidious, as if Wan and Whannell are declaring they will not become lazily predictable as the Sawfilms did after their absence.
 
There is actually quite a bit of originality present in the execution, as well as the now franchise-stapled slapstick camp associated with the first film’s tongue-in-cheek tone. Specs and Tucker especially get quite a few more pratfalls and sight gags while Renai seems almost aware of the absurdity in which she is participating. Ultimately, this levitating spectacle is actually strung up by strong performances from all the principals, continuing to prove that horror can benefit from good acting.


 
Yet since Insidious’s 2011 debut, the genre has changed again. There have been the passable knockoffs like last year’s Sinister with Ethan Hawke, but honestly it all pales in the wake of director Wan’s OTHER 2013 release, The Conjuring. That picture, which also stars Wilson, lacks the cheeky underhand of the Insidious films, but what it misses in self-awareness it makes up for in genuine scares. The Conjuring does not reinvent the wheel, but it does create one of the more horrific experiences to be had in a theater this year, which is incredibly impressive considering it is dealing with the tropes of ghosts, possession and witchcraft that are so wholly ubiquitous in our culture that even Ryan Murphy is pilfering through them on television.
 
Insidious peruses a more uncharted territory in 21st century religion with only some passing influences from Kubrick and Hitchcock. However, when the end result feels so contorted and browbeaten into its horror formula, there is little left to scare, but plenty to induce laughter. It’s a shame that only half of it is intentional.
 
Den of Geek Rating: 2.5 out of 5 Stars
5

First Pic of De Niro and Stallone in Grudge Match

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow9/12/2013 at 2:36PM

The Italian Stallion and Raging Bull square off for new boxing picture opening on Christmas Day.

It goes without saying that Sylvester Stallone knows his way around a boxing ring. Having played the Italian Stallion more times than even the mumbling superhero veteran, one would think the senior citizen action star would have had enough. But now he is pulling another icon of the ‘70s into the ring for one more bout.
 
Titled Grudge Match, Stallone will square off against Robert De Niro as they play decades old rivals who have one last punch to throw. Billy “The Kid” (Stallone) and Henry “Razor” Sharp (De Niro) find themselves coaxed into a bitter grudge match 50 years after their last heavyweight quarrel. And when will this epic clash occur? Christmas Day, of course, leaving even the oldest action crumudgeon as giddy as a schoolboy!


 
Can the big screen handle the Italian Stallion and the Raging Bull in the same frame? Could the photography cut to black and white at some point? I don’t know, but judging by this picture, I expect them to end the film in a friendly exhibition fight amongst themselves that spreads into an epic mural to the sweet sounds of “Eye of the Tiger” (the good version, not Katy Perry). C’mon, you know you want that too...
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>