Quantcast
Channel: Movies – Den of Geek
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live

The top 25 underappreciated films of 2000

$
0
0
Odd ListRyan Lambie11/28/2013 at 8:45AM

Our series of lists devoted to underappreciated films brings us to the year 2000, and another 25 overlooked gems...

The new millennium brought with it an eclectic range of hit films. Hong Kong action director John Woo brought us Mission: Impossible II, the most profitable movie of the year at the box office. Ridley Scott enjoyed one of the biggest critical and financial successes of his career with Gladiator, while Robert Zemeckis created a memorable drama with Tom Hanks and a ball named Wilson in Cast Away.

From a comic book movie standpoint, 2000 was also a key year. X-Men not only established a successful movie franchise which is still going, with X-Men: Days Of Future Past out next year, but also headed up a wave of big-budget Marvel adaptations which shows no sign of slowing down.

As ever, we've travelled far outside the list of highest-grossing films to compile this list. We've had to be quite brutal in our choices, so some worthy movies didn't quite make the cut - if you're into Japanese animation, do check out Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust, and Blood: The Last Vampire, while films like Frequency and The Road To El Dorado are also worth your consideration.

At any rate, here's our list of 25 underappreciated films from 2000 - yet another great year for movie theater.

25. Space Cowboys

Let's start with a solid hit from 2000, that's seeped a little out of the modern day movie consciousness. We're not going to make a case for Space Cowboys being a forgotten Clint Eastwood masterpiece, but it is an awful lot of fun. In fact, until it gets bogged down in telling the story that it's putting in place in the last third of the movie, this is a quality, light-hearted science fiction ensemble movie.

The twist this time is instead of sending young people/convincing astronauts/Bruce Willis and the lot into space, that a bunch of older actors are sent instead. So we get Clint, Tommy Lee Jones, James Garner and Donald Sutherland, gleefully poking fun at each other, and clearly the main reason to watch it. Eastwood's direction is unfussy as always, and it means there's space to enjoy the characters, and the crackling dialogue between them.

No classic, but Space Cowboys remains really good fun.

24. Gangster No 1

Director Paul McGuigan was the man responsible for directing two thirds of Sherlock series one and two, including the style-setting opening adventure. His work there was something of a revelation, but he'd been behind the camera on a few impressive movies too before acclaim finally caught up with him.

Gangster Number 1 is a slightly cold beast then, giving Paul Bettany a leading role as the young pretender taking under the wing of David Thewlis' Freddie Mays. Also in the cast are Malcolm McDowell and Eddie Marsan, and the movie itself is a dark, occasionally fun crime movie, buoyed by the strength of its performances, and McGuigan's taut direction.

Bettany in particular is excellent here, and whilst there are one or two mild story quibbles with the movie as a whole, and whilst it was outshone a little by Sexy Beast - which we're coming to shortly - Gangster No 1 is a really underrated movie.

23. Rugrats In Paris

Lots of films have paid homage, or tried to spoof, The Godfather. But take a look at the opening of Rugrats In Paris, and tell us it's not one of the most successful at it.

The movie itself is really good, too. Far superior to the original The Rugrats Movie, Rugrats In Paris - save for one song near the end - is a sharp, witty animated movie. The television show it's based on always had more in the tank than it was generally given credit for, as well as an interesting animation style. But this movie happily stands alone too, boasting strong characterisations, lots of laughs and a far tighter story than the first one.

22. Timecode

Mike Figgis has long been willing to experiment with his movies and try new things. Timecode is arguably one of his most ambitious projects, given that you're effectively expected to keep an eye on four things at once.

Figgis runs his movie in real time, with no edits. He also splits the screen into quarters, so we see four parts of the story at the same time. Granted, for periods there are some characters just travelling, which means your focus is on one or two at once. But then it's always worth checking for a little detail that slips into one of the frames. Timecode certainly isn't a movie to half-watch.

The split screen technique works far better than these words probably make it sound, and it's actually surprisingly easy to follow. It's engrossing, too, as Figgis gradually brings all four quarters together.

Nobody's really picked up the baton from Figgis and given this a try since. But Timecode at the very least proves that the technique can work, and work very well.

21. Faust: Love Of The Damned

Brian Yuzna's had a hand in an eclectic range of films.  He produced the anarchic Re-Animator. He wrote the kinky horror From Beyond (very loosely adapted from a HP Lovecraft tale), before writing the unexpectedly quaint body-shrink family movie Honey, I Shrunk The Kids. Then, just to prove he hadn't lost his horror edge, he directed Society, one of the most subversive and downright squishy films of the 80s.

Faust: Love Of The Damned isn't the best movie Yuzna's ever been involved with, but it's so fun - and downright odd - that it just about warranted  a place on this list. After an artist sells his soul to avenge the death of his girlfriend, he develops the worrying habit of turning into a huge horned demon with an uncontrollable desire to kill. Shot in Spain on a low budget, Faust is livened up by some fun gore and black humor, while Jeffrey Combs plays an unusually macho role as the cop on the killer hell spawn's trail.

20. Keeping The Faith

When it was announced that Edward Norton was making his directorial debut, you could have been forgiven for expecting a dark drama, or something of that ilk. Keeping The Faith, though, is a surprise in more than one sense.

Firstly, it sees Norton making a romantic comedy. Secondly, it's a very good one. Thirdly, he's for some reason never directed a movie since.

Let's make no bones about this, though: Keeping The Faith is really excellent. The core of the story is about a priest and rabbi, who both fall in love with the same woman. The Office's Jenna Elfman plays the object of their affection, Norton is the priest, and Ben Stiller is the rabbi. Norton then scores interesting cameo switch by persuading Milos Forman to step before the camera (and Anne Bancroft is in the cast, too).

There's humor, charm and a willingness to explore the subject of religion in quite a light way that makes Keeping The Faith a bit more ambitious than it might look on the outside. Jenna Elfman is outstanding here too, but it's the movie as a whole that wins out. One of the best romantic comedies of the decade for us, this one.

19. George Washington

For some, director David Gordon Green's name will be familiar from his recent work with Danny McBride, with the comedies Pineapple Express and Your Highness, but long before those films, he was writing and directing some excellent, truly underrated dramas, including this one. About a group of children enjoying a long hot summer in a poor region of North Carolina, George Washington is a slow-paced, melancholy drama with a hint of tragedy that vaguely recalls Ray Bradbury's classic short story, The Lake.

Green coaxes some remarkable, natural performances from the young cast, and George Washington is one of those tiny, barely-distributed films that deserves to be tracked down.

18. Boiler Room

Everyone looks worryingly young in this classy crime drama - or is that just us getting old? Giovanni Ribisi plays Seth, a trainee stockbroker who's drawn into a world of dodgy stock broking. Ben Affleck plays one of the firm's slick co-founders, who promises to make his employees rich by falsely inflating the value of shares and selling them to unwary buyers - a business practice that soon catches the interest of the FBI. Well written and acted, Boiler Room's aged remarkably well, and it's fascinating to see Vin Diesel in a low-key role that doesn't involve guns, fighting or absurdly fast cars.

17. Pollock

A passion project for Ed Harris, who directs as well as stars, Pollock gained some justified Academy Awards attention, but little fuss from movie theater-goers. This is a shame, because Harris' account of the abstract expressionist painter Jackson Pollock is captivating from beginning to end. The actor's commitment to playing the part shines through in every scene, with Harris creating his own versions of Pollock's famous drip paintings himself, and bringing his own robust charisma to this self-styled outlaw artist. Marcia Gay Harden is equally good as Lee Krasner, Pollock's wife and pal artist, while Val Kilmer's surprisingly restrained and awkward as another influential painter, Willem De Kooning.

Shot over the course of less than eight weeks, Pollock has, like the artist's work, a gritty energy that makes it a compelling watch from beginning to end.

16. Ginger Snaps

Although classed as a horror movie about werewolves, Ginger Snaps is so much more than that. The gradual process of changing into something hairy and bloodthirsty experienced by its heroine Ginger (Katharine Isabelle, who's brilliant), becomes a metaphor for the painful transition from youth to adult, and Ginger Snaps is unusual in that it's funny, unnerving and intelligent in more or less equal measure.

The first act, where Ginger and her sister indulge in their morbid fascination with death by taking pictures of themselves covered in blood, is perfectly done, and it's the movie's insistence on getting the characters and dialogue absolutely right that distinguishes it - when the blood starts to flow, the roundedness of the characters makes the horror all the more disquieting. Look out, too, for a great performance from Mimi Rogers as Ginger's mother.

15. Wonder Boys

Curtis Hanson's form in the 90s wasn't to sniffed at, and films such as The River Wild and Bad Influence deserve far more attention than they generally get. L.A. Confidential deservedly gave him a lot more exposure.

His first movie of the 2000s was Wonder Boys, a movie that left some people cold when they tried it for the first time. If that was you, might we suggest that this one's worth another go?

It features Michael Douglas - a man who's rarely shied away from a complex role - as English Professor Grady Tripp, a man coming to terms with his wife leaving him. Mind you, he's also got the pressures of a book deadline, Tobey Maguire's student and an abundance of other complications that we won't spoil here to deal with.

Hanson's movie is a dry, character-driven piece, with no shortage of wit to it. And it also boasts one of Michael Douglas' best screen performances.

14. Nurse Betty

There's not a very long list of films from Neil LaBute that you'd necessarily describe as massively accessible, but this is probably as close as you get (although for his best work on screen, check out the excellent Your Friends & Neighbours). Here, he casts Renee Zellweger, and she fully delivers, as a waitress who deals with her husband's murder by ultimately trying to track down her favorite soap opera actor (played by Greg Kinnear).

Morgan Freeman co-stars as a criminal on the tale of Betty as she takes on a road trip to meet her idol. Because unbeknownst to her, she's got something of his in the car.

It's not a particularly broad comedy this, and there's a bit more depth to it than it may first appear. As a starting point for LaBute's films - the best-forgotten remake of The Wicker Man aside - it's spot on.

13. Brother

We've included quite a few of Takeshi Kitano's films in these lists, but that's merely because they're so consistently good. Brother was Kitano's attempt at making a movie that would play better for an American audience, and like his character Yamamoto, there's a sense that he's a little out of his depth here. But while Brother isn't Kitano's best movie, it's still well worth watching, as his mid-ranking Japanese gangster heads to Los Angeles for a confrontation with the Mafia.

Kitano's typically terse, charismatic performance is offset by Omar Epps, who plays an African-American gangster who becomes Yamamoto's unlikely partner and, eventually, close friend. Watching as Yamamoto's multi-cultural gang gradually builds is engrossing and, despite all the bloodletting, the conclusion is unexpectedly warm and affecting. Kitano said he wasn't happy with the way Brother turned out, and vowed never to make another movie outside Japan again. But as an unusual one-off in an extraordinary filmmaking and acting career, Brother is well worth seeking out - if nothing else, it'll put you off using chopsticks for life.

12. Uzumaki

There was an explosion of interest in the late 90s and early 2000s, largely thanks to the huge success of films like Ring and Ju-on: The Grudge. Uzumaki seemed to pass by without gaining quite as much coverage as those other films, but that's probably because it's so quirky. It's set in a small town where the inhabitants are becoming strangely obsessed with the appearances of spirals in nature, before some of them begin turning into snails and displaying other curious, spiral-related symptoms.

More dreamlike than horrifying, director Higuchinsky succeeds in creating an alarmingly surreal atmosphere akin to a Tim Burton fantasy gone toxic. Critics seemed quite divided over Uzumaki's merits, and it's true that the movie's more about weird effects and visual non sequiturs than plot, but then, that's part of what makes it such a J-horror oddity: it's both mesmerising and, unlike so many horror films, frequently unpredictable.

11. The Way Of The Gun

Given how good The Way Of The Gun is, it seems a real pity that Christopher McQuarrie - generally best known for his screenwriting - didn't direct again until last year's Jack Reacher. He's now down to make Mission: Impossible 5, but The Way Of The Gun remains the movie of his to beat.

Ryan Phillippe and Benicio Del Toro headline the movie as a pair of crooks who make the wrong choice in kidnapping the surrogate mother to a very rich man. With a tip of the hat to the work of Sam Peckinpah, McQuarrie then puts together a modern day western, with a clear love for the genre. It's a violent, not always predictable movie, and one that's earned a growing cult following after failing to make much of a landing on its original release. Deservedly so, too.

10. Almost Famous

Although it didn't make a huge amount at the box office, Cameron Crowe's drama Almost Famous was hailed as one of the best films of the year by some critics, and with good reason:  it's arguably one of Crowe's most accomplished films. Patrick Fugit plays a young writer who manages to get a shot at producing an article for Rolling Stone magazine after being despatched to cover a Black Sabbath gig by rock journo royalty Lester Bangs (Philip Seymour Hoffman).

What follows is a convincing account of the 1970s rock scene (Crowe was a music journalist himself before becoming a filmmaker in the 80s) and a warm and funny drama, as the writer's coverage of mid-ranking rock band Stillwater's tour leads to his friendship with sparky fan Penny Lane (Kate Hudson). Although its emphasis is very much on the cosier aspects of rock-and-roll life in the 70s, its cast is uniformly excellent - with particular highlights being Billy Crudup as a moody guitarist and Frances McDormand as the writer's worrying mother - and it succeeds in being both funny and, towards the end, unexpectedly moving.

9. Sexy Beast

Any discussion of director Jonathan Glazer's crime drama is rightly dominated by Ben Kingsley's exceptional performance as the terrifying criminal Don Logan, for which he was nominated an Oscar the following year. If anything, it's the rest of the movie around him that's underrated, since it serves as the perfect backdrop for Kingsley's irresistible fury. Ray Winstone plays the ex-convict Gary Dove, who just wants a quiet retirement in Spain, while Ian McShane plays the gangster who's organising a bank heist which Dove refuses to be involved with. Determined to change his mind, Logan shows up at Dove's Spanish villa with little more than a suitcase and a mouthful of abuse.

Most recently, Glazer returned with Under The Skin, the sci-fi indie thriller that has earned great reviews at numerous movie festivals this year. Sexy Beast was a great debut for this former director of commercials and music videos, and as for Ben Kingsley - well, this is quite possibly the best, most startling performance in his long career so far.

8. Amores Perros

How's this for a directorial debut? Alejandro González Iñárritu may have gone on to the likes of Babel and 21 Grams, but he's never married up weighty subject matter with a strong movie anywhere near as successfully as he does  in Amores Perros.

Translating as 'Love's A Bitch', it's a movie about a car accident that glues together three different stories, and the many themes contained within them. Sold as a Mexican Pulp Fiction, that inevitably does the movie a little bit of a disservice, as it's a different movie trying to do different things. It also earned some controversy for the dog fighting content in the movie. That's a little harder to shy away from, as Iñárritu doesn't really pull his proverbial punches anywhere through the movie.

Shot in Mexico City and with no attempt to put any gloss on it at all, Amores Perros is a wonderfully woven, harsh and at times brutal piece of movie theater, and one that only adds to our anticpation of Iñárritu's next movie, Birdman (which we listed in our most-anticipated films of 2014).

7. Shadow Of the Vampire

A fanciful account of how FW Murnau made the seminal horror movie Nosferatu in 20s Czechoslovakia, Shadow Of The Vampire suggests that actor Max Schreck really was a bloodsucking creature of the night. Willem Dafoe is on stunning form as Schreck, disappearing beneath his pale, rat-like makeup so perfectly that it's easy to forget who's even playing him. Smudging the lines between fact and fiction, director E Elias Merhige's movie is both a comic observation of early filmmaking, and a highly effective horror movie in its own right; the recreation of the original Nosferatu's famous 'shadow on the stairs' sequence is brilliantly employed, and recreated with physical perfection by Dafoe.

There are some great performances, too, from John Malkovich as the reckless director, Cary Elwes as an ill-fated cinematographer, and the mighty Udo Kier as a grumpy production designer who grows increasingly suspicious of Schreck's sun-dodging habits.

6. Titan A.E.

Comfortably one of the most underappreciated animated films of the last 20 years, Titan A.E. crashed so hard at the box office that it put 20th Century Fox off animation for a while - at least until it discovered Ice Age - and Don Bluth hasn't directed another movie since.

A real pity, too. Titan A.E. is set in mail-apocalyptic times, and its innovative animation style sees hand-drawn and CG blended together really very well. But beyond the style, the movie itself works. This is an action packed science fiction movie set far into the future, with the survival of humanity at stake. That's hardly a radical story, granted, but at least Titan A.E. does something with it, and wraps it into an engaging, really very good, big, entertaining ride.

Joss Whedon is amongst the credited writers of this one incidentally, and it's a movie so forgotten that a Blu-ray release - which surely would be massively beneficial to it - is nowhere in sight. Such a shame, too, because Titan A.E. still deserves a far better fate. It's as exciting a blockbuster movie as any movie released in 2000.

5. Best In Show

The best comedies are often spun out of the most unlikely situations, and writer-director Christopher Guest finds a reach seam of humor in the world of competitive dog shows. Largely improvised and shot with a quick, documentary style, Best In Show is a world away from the current crop of glossy Hollywood comedies, but that's all part of the movie's irresistible charm.

Guest follows a disparate group of people from across America as they gather for the Mayflower Kennel Club Dog Show in Philadelphia, and entire scenes are devoted to the competitors' eccentricities. Guest plays one of the characters himself - bloodhound owner Harlan Pepper, who tells us all about his childhood ability to name every single variety of nut, much to the chagrin of his mother. Best In Show is full of wryly observed and very odd scenes like this, and it all gradually builds up to the competition itself, where Fred Willard steals the entire movie as a clueless commentator. With Eugene Levy, Catherine O'Hara, Parker Posey and Jennifer Coolidge among the ensemble cast, Best In Show is a classic comedy that is well worth rediscovering.

4. Chopper

Eric Bana is brilliant in this Australian drama about Mark 'Chopper' Read, based on the ex-convict's own book about his experiences. A bulked up Bana plays Chopper, a troubled man who's barely been out of prison since his teenage years. Tough and unflinching in its account of a criminal whose worst tendencies are perpetuated by the prison system, Chopper isn't an easy movie to watch, but its performances and direction make it a rewarding experience.

Director Andrew Dominik (who also wrote Chopper's screenplay) makes films relatively rarely, but when he does, they're real blasts of energy. The Assassination Of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford emerged in 2007, while Killing Them Softly followed five years later. Both are excellent, but Chopper, Dominik's debut, is equally accomplished.

3. American Psycho

Bret Easton Ellis's novel was hugely controversial when it was first published in 1991 (the author was even banned from Disneyland Paris for his sins), and before this adaptation came out in 2000, it was a wonder how anyone could render the book's aggressively violent prose into a workable movie.

As it turned out, director and co-writer (with Guinnevere Turner) Mary Harron was more than up to the task. Necessarily tempering some of the more graphic scenes in the book, she allows the satire and black comedy to come to the fore - and the result is, at times, screamingly funny. Christian Bale is note-perfect as Patrick Bateman, the 20-something investment banker who lives like a king in 80s Manhattan, while at the same time exploring a secret side-project as an indiscriminate serial murderer.

What's brilliant about both Bale's performance and the movie as a whole is in how well it exposes the pathetic coward lurking beneath Bateman's pouting, respectable mask. So many serial killer films depict their killers as mysterious, other-worldly beings, but Bateman's just a narcissistic buffoon, winking at his own reflection during sex and sweating over the superior design of his colleagues' business cards.

As an exploration of financial greed taken to its absurd, bloody extreme, American Psycho is a great snapshot of the 80s, but also contains themes that are still relevant today. Bale's ability to portray rich playboys with a dark side arguably contributed to his casting as valet a few years later, but American Psycho also exposes the actor's capacity for comedy - a talent he's rarely explored since.

2. Thirteen Days

Guilty as charged: the Den Of Geek official Kevin Costner love-in continues. But heck: watch Thirteen Days, a movie that took just $66m at the worldwide box office off a budget of $80m, and tell us that it didn't deserve much, much more.

We've praised Costner several times for the bravery and boldness in his movie choices, and his reunion with his No Way Out director Roger Donaldson is a tense, gripping portrayal of the Cuban missile crisis, and the world being on the brink of war.

It's a movie packed with characters painted in shades of grey, and Costner leads as Kenny O'Donnell, who worked with John F Kennedy (played by Bruce Greenwood) during the crisis. There are liberties taken with history, that the movie has subsequently been criticised for. That's perhaps to be expected to a degree, but it should be acknowledged. That notwithstanding, as a starting point to a story that nearly brought the world to its knees, Thirteen Days is both excellent movie theater, and a real motivator to go and find out more.

"You'll never believe how close we came", read the tagline. Even knowing the eventual ending, Thirteen Days absolutely gripped us from start to finish on the big screen. Find us a better Hollywood political thriller in the 2000s, and we'll warmly shake your hand.

Expect, inevitably, more Costner love when we get to Open Range...

1. Battle Royale

Can Battle Royale, now commonly regarded as a cult classic, really be described as underrated? Given that it wasn't a financial hit outside Japan, and that wider American audiences only got to appreciate it 11 years after it was made suggests to us that, while Battle Royale does indeed have a devoted following, it deserves to be seen by even more people.

Set in a near future where school children are forced into fighting one another to the death on a remote island, Battle Royale's chilling violence is overseen by the ubiquitous Takeshi Kitano, who plays a brutal and callous teacher. Director Kinji Fukusaku skilfully adapts Koushun Takami's source novel, making each member of the ensemble cast a memorable and distinct character while ensuring the sense of tension never ebbs away.

What's most remarkable about Battle Royale, though, is not its startling violence (which was extremely controversial in Japan at the time), but how much humanity Fukusaku finds in amongst it all. Bringing his own wartime experiences to the movie, the director brings an incredibly youthful sense of anger and anti-establishment outrage to Battle Royale, which is offset by how innocent and warm the characters are in among all the chaos.

It's the balance of blood-soaked satire and human depth that makes Battle Royale an aggressive, gut-punch of a movie. Sometimes described as Japan's A Clockwork Orange, the movie has lost none of its potency since its release more than a decade ago.

See also: the 250 underappreciated films of the 1990s

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


Disqus - noscript

Battle Royal was good, don't know if under appreciated. Only live action Japanese movie I know of besides Old Boy!

Why is it that everyone seems to turn a blind eye to the fact that The Hunger Games is a blatant (and cheap) ripoff of Battle Royale? How Suzanne Collins has avoided being sued for plagiarism is beyond comprehension. Skip her crap book and movie and read the Koushun Takami novel and see the movie Battle Royale instead.

Ummm...Jenna Elfman was not on The Office...


Bill & Ted 3 "would cost $400m to make"

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew11/29/2013 at 7:56AM

A bit of pruning's going to be required to get Bill & Ted 3 moving, Keanu Reeves has revealed...

Keanu Reeves' next movie, 47 Ronin, finally makes it to cinemas this Christmas, having being delayed many times on its journey there. Had all gone to the original plan, the movie would have been released a year ago. But it didn't, and we remain hopeful that the troubled production will finally prove worthy of the wait.

Another project Reeves is involved with that's not been going too quickly is the long-awaited third Bill & Ted movie. Both Reeves and Alex Winter have spoken about the movie several times over the past year or two, and Galaxy Quest's Dean Parisot is apparently in place to direct. Furthermore, Ed Solomon and Chris Matheson have been working on the screenplay.

But the screenplay might just be the current hold up, Reeves has told Access Hollywood. "It needs to be adapted because right now, it would cost $400m to make", he admitted. "There's a rift in the universe and there's all sorts of creatures", he revealed. "The script is funny and there's a story to tell there, so there are efforts being made to try and continue that journey".

Bill & Ted 3 remains in the works for the time being, then. Hopefully 2014 is the year when it finally springs to life...

Access Hollywood.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

I would hope that they will have a screenplay ready to go next year

Sony registers domains for The Last Of Us movie

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew11/29/2013 at 7:58AM

Could PlayStation 3 hit The Last Of Us be heading to the movies?

It might just be the PlayStation 3's last truly great game. The Last Of Us was released earlier this year to universal acclaim, and with good reason. The survival horror game is really quite special, and it's also sold millions of copies too. An original title, then, that's very good, that's hit big. That doesn't happen often enough.

Sony isn't one not to capitalise on such a big thing though, and it's been revealed that it's now registered domains for a potential movie version of The Last Of Us. This may be sensible housekeeping of course (although if it was, surely the movie domains would have been registered back in the infancy of the game). As it is, Sony's brand protection agency, MarkMonitor, has officially registered TheLastOfUs-Movie.com and TheLastOfUsMovie.net.

Whether this turns into something more concrete remains to be seen. But one of Sony's most profitable movie franchises has been the Resident Evil films, the last of which is planned for next September. Might The Last Of Us be taking its place the year after, we wonder?

IGN.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Homefront Director Gary Fleder Calls The Film a Western

$
0
0
InterviewDon Kaye11/29/2013 at 8:11AM

The filmmaker behind Jason Statham’s latest thriller talks Westerns, screenwriter Sylvester Stallone, Kate Bosworth and how to cook meth.

In Homefront, Jason Statham stars as retired DEA agent Phil Broker, who wants to escape the memories of a drug bust gone bad and the loss of his wife by settling with his little daughter in a quiet Louisiana town. But trouble finds Broker in the shape of a drug addict (Kate Bosworth) who wants revenge after Broker’s daughter puts her bully son in his place in the schoolyard, and Broker has to do the same with her husband. When the woman asks her meth-dealer brother Gator (James Franco) to intervene, a series of events is launched that forces Broker to act – and brings him face to face with some old enemies.
 
Based on a novel by Chuck Logan, Homefront was written for the screen by Sylvester Stallone, who once envisioned it as a vehicle for his Rambo character. But the movie now is tailored for Statham’s tough everyman persona, and bringing it to the screen is director Gary Fleder, whose own career was launched with the modern noir Things to Do in Denver When You’re Dead and whose credits include Kiss the Girls, Don’t Say a Word and The Express.
 
In this exclusive interview, we sat down with Fleder to talk about working with Sylvester Stallone the writer, Jason Statham and Kate Bosworth, why Homefront is actually a Western, and how the process of cooking meth is just about the worst thing you can imagine.
 
Den Of Geek: I read that you and the cast looked at this as a Western.
Gary Fleder: Yeah, I mean I think like every good film geek -- there’s no bigger film geek than me, maybe Tarantino -- I love the genre and as we all know, over the last 20, 30-plus years, the Western has been going in and out of style. True Grit’s a huge hit and people think, “Oh, the Western’s back.” And then all of a sudden, there’s no Westerns. I think that what I like about the Western paradigm is its simplicity. But in its simplicity there is all this great stuff going on with the characters and the dynamics. Like somebody said to me about Homefront, “Wow, it’s a really simple story.” I was like, “Yeah, it’s a simple story, but I wouldn’t call the relationship between James Franco and Kate Bosworth a simple story. Or him and Winona Ryder -- there’s all these very eccentric relationships in the story. And also the one between Statham and his daughter.
 
I think that by keeping the story tense but simple, you can focus on those little details and the behaviors in it, you know. It’s also a story about a father and daughter. You know, being a dad -- I have a little girl who’s five and it’s challenging, it’s maddening, it’s inspiring. So, I think that the father-daughter relationship in this movie was also really compelling for me. It was a treat, because Jason’s not a dad so oftentimes he looked to me about certain behaviors and, you know, what’s it like to be a father, because that’s its own challenge.
 
It's sometimes interesting to wonder how your reaction to a particular type of story is colored by your own experiences -- in this case, would you react differently to the story before you had your daughter?
I don’t know. When I saw Man on Fire, which I think is just a masterpiece and the film that I’ve referenced a lot for this movie, I was very moved by the relationship between Denzel Washington and Dakota Fanning. I mean, Tony Scott took a lot of care and time to set up that relationship. And I remember seeing it and getting a little misty watching it. I think it’s either in you or it’s not in you, and either you have the connection to kids and the innocence or not. There’s a line in Homefront where she says, "I miss mom so much my stomach hurts." That line was spoken by a good friend of mine. His son said that to him. He said he had tears in his stomach. That was a way of saying he was sad and I thought it was just beautiful -- I sort of stole that one line in the movie. It's the idea that that’s how kids talk -- they can’t describe what it’s like to be sad but they said they have just tears in their belly or something, you know?


 
Going back to the western thing for a minute, is this the way we can present them now, in modern guise, without actual cowboys and such?
I don’t know. I mean, you know, you have a True Grit that’s a huge hit. You make No Country for Old Men, which is kind of contemporary but it’s a huge hit. You have Deadwood that’s on the air for like five, six years. So I think that everyone says some genre is dead till it’s not. Horror movies are dead then they’re not. Comedies are dead, then they’re not. Every few years people sort of revive a genre. I just think that to recognize the Western paradigm is to recognize certain archetypes. You know, I’ve got the sheriff. I’ve got the villain and the town who is afraid of him. I’ve got the outsider who comes to town who doesn’t want trouble, then trouble finds him. I mean, you have a lot of the same paradigms, but I think in that paradigm in this movie there’s still surprises. For example, Kate Bosworth has an arc that you never see coming. She actually changes. And I think that’s something you would never predict in the first half hour of the movie. So I think that expectations might be that maybe people think that these kinds of movies are pandering to the audience but I actually would say that this movie is just really entertaining. I mean, that’s the thing. It’s meant to be sort of be a really great diversion for 98 minutes.
 
A lot of the public doesn't think of Sylvester Stallone as a screenwriter or even remember that he wrote Rocky.
Sly is actually a very, very good writer. I think he’s a good writer because he’s also a good actor, you know. A lot of the good writing is about understanding character motivation and that’s why David Mamet was an actor before he was a writer. Sly was certainly struggling as an actor back in the early '70s before he became the writer on Rocky. And even when we worked together on Homefront, he did the rewrites, and then we did a rehearsal period, and I was really impressed and excited to see that all he cared about was, like, what did this character want in this scene. It wasn’t about the plot. It wasn’t about the machinations of the story, you know? It was always about the characters and what they wanted in the scene. I think he also confronted all his characters with a certain degree of empathy. I think he understood who they were. They weren’t just characters to him. But yeah, Sly is an Oscar-nominated writer for Rocky. He went up against Paddy Chayefsky on Network that year.


 
This was originally written as a potential fourth Rambo film.
Yeah I heard that too. I see some connection to that. I guess that means Rambo packed it in and moved to this town. To me there’s that sort of First Blood thing going on where you’ve got the town, the sheriff, you know, the “don’t get in my way, boy” kind of thing going on. But I don’t think the draft that I got was that draft. I think I got one that was developed closer to the book by Chuck Logan because it was a novel first. A very good book in fact. And a lot of the stuff that helped me with the script and the story later on was that I went back to the book and sort of got my head into the characters that way.
 
My theory on that is that he might have realized that the time had passed not only for him to play Rambo again, but also for that kind of larger-than-life action hero.
I think it goes back even to the original Die Hard, in that people like vulnerability in their heroes. I think what we haven’t referenced at all in this conversation is Cop Land. Sly and I talked about that, because I talked about that with Jason as well. Sly’s very proud of that film and he should be. He’s a guy that’s not the alpha male to the extreme. He’s this kind of schlubby guy in this little New Jersey town getting his ass kicked by local cops. And he has to rise to the occasion at the end -- kind of like a western.
 
So on Homefront, it really was a notion for Sly and Jason about investigating the vulnerability of the character. The guy who’s humble. He doesn’t want to fight. He apologizes even when he’s not in the wrong. But there's also the idea that he’s going to be the man that he is, you know, at some point. Maybe it’s pride. Maybe it’s vanity. Maybe it’s his temperament but there's a certain point where he can’t keep walking away from trouble. And I think the whole movie’s about the notion of loss at the very end. I won’t give away the ending but at the very, very end, when he has a critical moment with Franco, he has to decide what kind of man he's going to be for his daughter. And I think again as a dad that’s a very powerful thing for me. When I watch that scene now I get teary. It just affects me. I think it’s just a very profound thing to think about -- how does your kid see you.
 
I was actually going to bring up the apology scene because it’s just something you don’t expect to see the hero doing -- apologizing and walking away. He really spends the first half of the movie trying to walk away. It’s interesting for this kind of film and also interesting for Statham. It’s a different performance than I don’t think people are used to seeing from him. Was that something you and he talked about?
First of all, Jason is very self-aware, I think. He’s very cognizant of his onscreen persona. Second of all, he really, really, really respects Sly. They’re very close friends, and he admires him greatly. He has tremendous admiration for him and his career, and I think that when Sly gave this to him he took it very seriously. Then as the process went on, I was talking a lot to Jason about letting his charm, his humor, the smile, all those things come out, and then Sly talked about the notion of the character's humility. In the rehearsal process we talked about that too -- even when you’re not wrong, to say I’m sorry makes you a bigger man. So I think that Jason really got that and it wasn’t hard for him. Even that scene at the gas station which has been used a lot in the promos, if you look at that scene in its entirety there’s a long period where he’s trying to not have it go sideways.


 
Any thoughts on the rest of the cast?
I do want to say I think that Kate Bosworth is really worth recognizing. I think that this is an amazing transformation for her. Even I’m astonished at her commitment to this, and how she physically and emotionally shows how ugly this character is. Hopefully, people will see just how she’s really evolved as an actor. It’s a very unpleasant character in a good way.
 
The movie is set in this sort of pastoral environment with a very dark underbelly of the meth labs in the woods and that sort of thing, which seems to have gripped a lot of filmmakers recently.
I think it was in the book and the book was written in 2000. So, Chuck Logan was ahead of the zeitgeist on that one. It's all the fringe communities, the fringe areas of any small town are probably also the fringe of the drug culture. I’m sure they could manufacture cocaine, but I think meth is something you can manufacture if you can get access to the right chemicals, as we’ve seen from Breaking Bad. And also I don’t think meth is necessarily a big part of the story. It’s just more of a MacGuffin. The Gator character doesn’t care about anybody or anything but cashing in. Having spent time researching what goes into making meth, it really is horrible. To see them physically making it, it’s like the worst stuff you can imagine. It’s the worst thing I’ve ever seen in terms of how they manufacture it. I’ve seen demonstrations of it. So I think definitely it represents the fact that whoever’s making and selling it doesn’t care about the outcome of the person taking it, because it’s like basically handing them a shotgun and saying, “Put this in your mouth.”
 
Homefront is out in theaters now.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Out of the Furnace Review

$
0
0
ReviewGabe Toro11/29/2013 at 10:39AM

Christian Bale and Casey Affleck offer grace notes in this very gritty revenge film formula.

Revenge takes several forms, except in movies. When someone makes a revenge film, no matter how “realistic,” the protagonist usually knows what’s up. There are steps taken to eliminate the bad guy, usually then followed with exact precision, the hero shooting straight, the villain getting a tidy, inevitable comeuppance, and, in some more contemporary films, a brief, often insincere meditation on the cycle of violence. And for all that fancy buildup, Out of the Furnace is pretty much one of those movies.
 
What stands out in this moody thriller is the small, believable touches. Much of that comes from Christian Bale who, away from a cape and cowl, has often specialized in more minute character work, where his performances quietly add reality and nuance to their surroundings without standing out. As Russell Baze, he’s all sinewy limbs and hangdog expressions, with a beard that seems carved into a frown even when he smiles. You only need to look at Russell to see that he’s a part of an economically-strapped environment, a product of dashed dreams and heavy expectations. Before Russell even says anything substantial, Bale’s eyes alone convey that this guy does some heavy lifting when he gets off his factory job.
 
We soon learn he’s putting food on the table for himself and his brother Rodney, played by Casey Affleck with his customary thousand-mile stare. Rodney feels like he’s supposed to be a bit younger than Affleck is playing him, but you accept it because he’s specialized in playing scrappy underdogs his whole career, and physically Casey’s always going to seem less imposing than his Oscar-winning brother. His Rodney is the type who went off to the Middle East and came back disappointed that there was no parade. While post-service employment seems like a reality, it also seems likely that some of those opportunities won’t reach the town of Rust Belt, Pennsylvania, and the ones that do don’t interest Rodney, who sees the factory as one of the last steps towards a dull life.


 
The film’s initial misstep might be the seemingly arbitrary decision to begin the film with an introduction to the villain, greaseball troublemaker Harlan DeGroat. In the very first scene, DeGroat, essayed by Woody Harrelson, gets into a petty squabble at a drive-in theater with his date, brutalizing her, and then delivering a clumsy beating to a curious Samaritan. The tone is set for unrelenting brutality in those moments, casting a shadow over the humanity Bale and Affleck bring to their roles. The additional touch of the drive-in playing Ryuhei Kitamura’s cheeky Midnight Meat Train also seems fairly tone-deaf, as if the filmmakers sought something appropriately nasty and foreboding would do. Frankly, the rights to Midnight Meat Train are probably cheap, so it makes practical sense, at least.
 
Harlan’s got his hands in everything crime-related, which makes it karmic that Russell has a brief interaction with him before having a drink, landing Russell in an avoidable drunk driving accident.  Five years behind bars places Rodney on notice, and instead of being a mopey hoodrat, he’s become one of the region’s best bare-knuckle boxers. It’s not a surprise to know that these seemingly disorganized brawls are often controlled and gamed by dime-store overlords who frequently pay Rodney extra to take a dive. Rodney bristles at the idea though, as his narrative involves him becoming the hero. The cheers of these frequently hygienically-challenged crowds empowers him when he wins, even as they toss dollars around and yell epithets to each other. The extras are well-cast, and the locations are eerily evocative in creating the underground crime world of Rust Belt. There’s even something queasily disgusting about the smoky, dimly-lit behind-the-bar “office” of Rodney’s good-hearted “agent” John Petty, played by a grody, ponytailed Willem Dafoe. This isn’t where big business is done: This is just crappy office space left behind by someone else.
 
Unfortunately, Out of the Furnace does seem to follow the same steps we’ve seen before, using station-to-station plotting to show Rodney and Petty falling into debt with the wrong people, leading Harlan to darken their doorstep. The quickest option is to book a fight in lawless Ramapo, New Jersey, a real-life hotbed of Appalachian criminal networks just begging for its own AMC show. Petty initially refuses, but giving into Rodney’s pleas suggests even he’s unaware that this is not a trip one makes casually. Russell doesn’t seem as dim, and when he learns the news he knows exactly what’s going on. An ineffectual chat with the police (personified by Forest Whitaker’s usual combination of tenderness and hostility) forces him to take action, and fortunately, this is Appalachian Country – you don’t put a gun in Batman’s hand and pretend he doesn’t know what he’s doing.


 
This is the second film from Scott Cooper following the country music drama Crazy Heart, and it seems very much that he’s established himself as a genre filmmaker. His earlier effort very much fit the framework of a musician falling off his horse, and benefitted from a Jeff Bridges performance that turned the film from possible springtime mercy-release into Oscar bait for studio Fox Searchlight. But it certainly wasn’t reinventing the wheel, and neither is Out of the Furnace, instead depicting a grimy world where it seems certain no man will find salvation. Cooper dots the margins of the film with fine actors, including Sam Shepherd as cousin Red and Zoe Saldana as Russell’s schoolteacher lover, but neither have much to do. Which makes sense: Likely they imagined they had signed up for a prestige picture, not another grimy revenge movie with grace notes, but a deadening inevitability. Miserablist but well-acted, Out of the Furnace creates an achingly upsetting world of loss and dead ends, but it’s a familiar, if accurate, formula.
 
Den of Geek Rating: 3 out of 5 Stars
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
6

Watch The Trailer for The Legend of Hercules

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek11/29/2013 at 2:53PM

Kellan Lutz stars in Renny Harlin's The Legend of Hercules. Watch the trailer here!

The trailer for Renny Harlin's The Legend of Hercules doesn't skimp on the action, that's for sure, and Twilight star Kellan Lutz makes for a suitably strapping Hercules (if a bit fresh-faced). So, will The Legend of Hercules deliver? Watch the trailer and see for yourself!
 

The Legend of Hercules also stars  Scott Adkins, Liam McIntyre, Liam Garrigan, Jonathan Schaech, Roxanne McKee, Gaia Weiss, and Rade Serbedzija. It opens on January 10th, 2014...beating Bret Ratner's Hercules film (starring Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson) to the arena by quite some time!

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Fast & Furious Star Paul Walker Has Died

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek11/30/2013 at 10:49PM

Paul Walker, star of The Fast & The Furious and Varsity Blues has died in a car crash.

Paul Walker, handsome action star famous for starring roles in the incredibly popular Fast & Furious franchise, has died at the age of 40. Walker was reportedly in Santa Clarita raising money for victims of Typhoon Haiyan through his charity organization, Reach Out Worldwide. Walker's passing was confirmed via his official social media pages, as well as through his publicist, who told NBC News that "Sadly I must confirm that Paul did pass away today in a car accident."

The statement posted on Walker's official Twitter and Facebook pages, as well as on Reach Out Worldwide's Facebook page reads:

"It is with a truly heavy heart that we must confirm that Paul Walker passed away today in a tragic car accident while attending a charity event for his organization Reach Out Worldwide. He was a passenger in a friend's car, in which both lost their lives. We appreciate your patience as we too are stunned and saddened beyond belief by this news. Thank you for keeping his family and friends in your prayers during this very difficult time. We will do our best to keep you apprised on where to send condolences. - #TeamPW"

Walker was currently starring in Fast & Furious 7, scheduled for release on July 11, 2014, has been filming since September. Fast & Furious 6 will be released on DVD and blu-ray on December 10th.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Paul Walker: the heart of the Fast & Furious franchise

$
0
0
FeatureRyan Lambie12/2/2013 at 8:40AM

We bid a sad farewell to Paul Walker, and salute his contribution to the Fast & Furious franchise, and his outstanding charity work...

In the 2003 sequel 2 Fast 2 Furious, a daredevil race through the streets of Miami ends with its gasoline head hero Brian O’Conner sliding his car sideways across the finish line, the supercharged Nissan skidding to a halt mere inches from the cheering crowd.

That stunt was performed by actor Paul Walker himself, and the supercharged Nissan Skyline was his own. It’s evidence not only of Walker’s skill as a driver, but also the amount of dedication he put into his role in the Fast & Furious franchise, which began only two years before.

Born in Southern California in 1973, Walker’s career as an actor began when he was still a child, with TV shows including Who’s The Boss? and Highway To Heaven marking his first screen appearances in the 1980s, before he landed a series of supporting roles in films such as Pleasantville and She’s All That in the 90s.

It was 2001‘s The Fast And The Furious, which paired him with the larger-than-life screen presence of Vin Diesel, which broke Walker into the mainstream. Although widely regarded as a B-movie, inspired as it was by a magazine article about illegal street racing, The Fast And The Furious proved to be a hit with audiences.

The movie introduced Walker’s character Brian, an LAPD undercover cop who infiltrates a street racing gang led by Vin Diesel’s Dominic Toretto, only to become intoxicated by its culture of fast cars and pure shots of racing adrenaline.

Despite his uncommonly good looks, Walker exuded an easy-going, everyman type of charisma, and it was arguably this, paired with Diesel’s growling machismo, that made the first movie the success it was.

Even without the presence of Diesel, the 2003 sequel 2 Fast 2 Furious was another hit, placing Walker’s cop on the trail of a vicious drug runner in Miami. Introducing Tyrese Gibson as O’Conner’s new car-obsessed partner, 2 Fast 2 Furious fixed in place many of the elements that would make the franchise a growing phenomenon over the next decade: a boyish fascination with over-the-top stunts, implausible thriller plots, and an underlying, knowing sense of humor.

The 2006 sequel The Fast And The Furious: Tokyo Drift was the only series entry not to star Walker, and was only moderately successful with audiences. But Tokyo Drift also introduced director Justin Lin to the series, and he played a key role in its explosive return to form in the years that followed.

Fast & Furious, released in 2009, brought back Walker, Diesel and several other characters from the first movie, and marked the start of a new era for the franchise. Better than any other director so far, Lin understood what it was that made these films a hit with movie theater-goers: beneath all the stunts and action, the Fast franchise is about an unlikely family of outlaws, and how their friendship thrives in the face of danger.

It was this sense of friendship that again provided the focus in 2011‘s Fast Five, in which Diesel and Walker’s family of outlaws, now older but not much wiser, attempted to pull off a daring bank heist in Rio De Janeiro. The movie’s studio, Universal, put aside the biggest budget yet for the fourth sequel, but the investment proved to be a shrewd one. Buoyed by the introduction of Dwayne Johnson as the improbably beefed-up cop on its heroes’ trail, Fast Five became the biggest hit in the series so far, making more than $600m worldwide.

This year’s Fast & Furious 6 was an even bigger hit, with its action-thrilled tour across Europe helping to bring in an estimated $788m.

By this point, the Fast franchise had travelled far from its racing origins, with heist, gangsters and revenge now taking center stage in the stories. But still, that good-natured warmth remained, and Walker’s likeable, generous presence was a huge part of that. Even when surrounded by a crowded ensemble of martial arts stars, ex-models and former MMA fighters, as he was in Fast & Furious 6, Walker remained the laid-back spark in the middle of it all.

Walker’s generosity also extended to his life away from the big screen, and it’s tragic that, when he died in a a car accident on the 30th November 2013, he was raising money for his charity Reach Out Worldwide, a disaster relief organisation he helped set up in 2010 following the earthquakes in Haiti.

At this stage, it’s too early to say how Walker’s untimely death will affect Fast & Furious 7, which is currently in production and was originally scheduled for release in the summer of 2014, or the projected sequels Universal had planned for the coming years. But without Walker, the franchise’s family is left with an empty chasm at its core.

As that car-sliding stunt near the start of 2 Fast 2 Furious proved, Walker was the beating heart of a franchise that was all about the love of adrenaline and facing danger with a broad smile. The Fast franchise will likely continue, but Paul Walker will never be replaced.


Joel Kinnaman on the RoboCop suit

$
0
0
NewsGlen Chapman12/2/2013 at 8:41AM

Joel Kinnaman has been chatting about the suit he wore in the upcoming RoboCop reboot.

There's a lot to be suspicious of, but we remain firmly interested in the upcoming RoboCop reboot. For two reasons, really: it has a damn fine cast, and an excellent director. Nobody on the planet was calling for a new take on RoboCop, but fingers crossed that all concerned can do something interesting with it.

Playing Murphy this time around is the immensely talented Joel Kinnaman, who is perhaps best known for his work in the US version of The Killing. But he has a number of credits to his name over a long career. His finest work to date is in the Easy Money trilogy.

The actor has been chatting about wearing the suit, something that caused Peter Weller considerable discomfort all those years ago. Talking to Total movie, he said that "it was very uncomfortable. I'm not wearing much under the suit... you feel naked. Also, when the cameras weren't rolling, I felt awkward and embarrassed. It was hard to move my head an everything was making my back ache. I used that awkwardness because that's what Murphy would have felt, times a thousand".

You may recall that attempts to make the suit more comfortable for Weller in RoboCop 2 left it looking a little bit tinged with blue. There's no such problem this time around.

RoboCop is set for release on February 7th 2014

Total movie

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Sin City TV series to follow next movie

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew12/2/2013 at 8:42AM

Sin City, The Mist and Scream are all heading to the small screen, courtesy of The Weinstein Company...

Robert Rodriguez is hard at work on the eagerly-awaited second Sin City movie, Sin City: A Dame To Kill For. The movie was originally due in cinemas this year, but has been put back to a release in August 2014 instead. That means it'll follow the first movie by nine years, but you won't have to wait too long after that for further on-screen Sin City adventures, it seems.

That's because The Weinstein Company is reportedly mulling over a Sin City television spin-off, which would follow the cinematic release of A Dame To Kill For. Both Frank Miller and Robert Rodriguez are involved in the television production.

The Weinstein Company also has the television take on Scream on its slate, A pilot for that is underway for MTV.

Also, the firm is reportedly working with Frank Darabont to put together a 10-part television series of The Mist, based on the Stephen King book. Darabont previously made a rightly-acclaimed movie version of the book.

More on all of these projects once we hear more...

New York Times.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

Landscape of Current or Possible Future Superhero/Comic Book TV Series.

DC:
Arrow
Flash
Hourman
iZombie
Young Justice
Gotham
Constantine

Marvel:
Agents of SHIELD
Daredevil
Luke Cage
Jessica Jones
Iron Fist
The Defenders

Dark Horse:
Sin City

When did this happen? Avengers?

The Tao of Jason Statham

$
0
0
FeatureGabe Toro12/2/2013 at 8:45AM

Jason Statham's Homefront may have had a mixed reaction this past holiday weekend, but one thing is certain, the disciplined cult of Statham is alive and kicking.

In the music industry, there’s the impression that critics, at least post-90s (and particularly post-Internet), have moved the goalposts of rock and roll. The inescapability of “popular music” has forced erudite writers on music to treat seriously lesser artists like 2 Chainz and Britney Spears, as if their every move is worth documenting, each album a Rosetta Stone to the larger world of pop music. The flipside to that, of course, is a penalization of artists who emerge with a certain skill set and strong debut albums. The claws are out with the second and third albums when suddenly, the sound that seemed so sharp and revelatory the first time around, is not accompanied by a newfound sense of experimentation. Rock critics are quicker to praise a musician for experimenting with auto-tune or dubstep beats, no matter how poorly, before they are to celebrate certain musicians for developing and sharpening one stellar, unique sound. Critics typing through their Ke$ha think-pieces a day after her album drops are the same ones who would probably have marginalized The Who back in the day for “doing that rousing arena rock thing again.”
 
In a lot of ways this analog spirit lives on with Jason Statham. If Statham were a part of the music world, critics would have ensured he was jettisoned overseas, doomed to be “big in Japan” and an afterthought anywhere else. But a funny thing happened: Statham stuck around. The issue of whether he’s ever been a marquee attraction remains muddled, as he’s never been the leading man for a true smash hit. But has anyone ever lost their shirt on Statham’s consistently low-budget action efforts? Modern stars keep experimenting in a quest to fill every box: Jake Gyllenhaal has to be tortured in Zodiac and Prisoners while also being a greased up superhero in The Prince Of Persia: The Sands Of Time, while Philip Seymour Hoffman has to stretch his bonafides by doing time in both Mission: Impossible III and The Hunger Games: Catching Fire.
 
You’re not going to catch Statham reach for “legitimacy.” The question of whether he can act should have been answered early on, as Statham was recruited from the modeling world for Guy Ritchie’s Lock, Stock And Two Smoking Barrels as well as Snatch. The former finds Statham as a fast-talking hustler in a mostly comic-turn where he fit within a tight ensemble. It was Snatch when audiences understood who this guy was: In a film loaded with Brad Pitt and Benicio Del Toro acting out on all sorts of silly performing tics (and Dennis Farina and Alan Ford killing it in support), Statham played the able-bodied straight man, an Average Joe type about to be in over-his-head as the fall guy for a fight scheme. When elderly Ford comes face-to-face with Statham, the geezer is meant to reflect a physical threat to a bloke who ultimately stood a very normal 5”10.
 
Hollywood came calling, but mostly in sidekick roles that utilized his macho straight man capabilities. He was adrift in John Carpenter’s Ghosts Of Mars, playing a flimsy paperweight of a character, and watching the film today is like seeing a natural resource squandered. What a pleasure it might have been for Carpenter to have a leading man as wry and masculine as Statham. He fared better in The One opposite future frequent co-star Jet Li, but that was strictly Li’s show, and no one was beginning to suggest Statham, who had studied many martial arts, was Li’s peer. This was back in the age of Revolution Studios, a short-lived venture dedicated towards making glossy, disposable star vehicles like America’s Sweethearts and Vin Diesel’s XxX. Surely, they would have found a couple of big budget vehicles for Statham had they not folded so quickly.


 
It took Luc Besson to realize that when unchanged, Statham was a potential marquee attraction. The Besson-penned The Transporter alerted the world to this beefy ass-kicker with one simple strategy: They took his shirt off. Statham had been playing grunts until then, but his pedestrian height and compact figure didn’t suggest a world-class athlete underneath (Statham had previously served with Britain’s National Diving Squad for twelve years). Seeing his muscular frame deliver blows was a shock. In a year that saw Spider-Man become one of the highest-grossing films of the year off the back of Tobey Maguire’s regular young-dude frame, Statham was already a man out of time, with his meaty physique and gravelly tough guy accent.
 
The Transporter was not a huge hit, but it was big enough to serve notice, the birth of a star. Unshackled from being a sidekick, Statham is stoic but funny, sexy but straight-forward. His greatest asset was a no-nonsense countenance, one that only he would crack ever so often with a bashful, or rueful smile, as if it had been sprung on him when he wasn’t looking. This made him a perfect match for Frank Martin, cunning courier with the skills to get any package from point A to point B. The Transporter was still small fries, however, a modestly-performing actioner compared to the blockbusters of the early aughts, and Statham continued to play second banana in films like The Italian Job, Collateral and a rare bad guy turn in Cellular.
 
The Transporter 2 ended up out-performing its predecessor, and it’s easy to see why. It’s a bigger, splashier, sillier sequel. But, like some of the earlier James Bond films, Statham wears his poker-face all throughout, taking the action seriously as it reaches new levels of absurdity. It’s a candy-coated film with the sort of R-rated violence that slips by the MPAA with a PG-13, and Statham is a physical dynamo. You go to Statham films for that curious personality, but also for that tremendous physicality, and co-directors Corey Yuen and Louis Leterrier aren’t afraid to basically let Statham fly. The Transporter 2 plays so fast and loose with physics that Frank Martin might as well be wearing a cape. It suits Statham just fine.
 
Statham found himself actually stretching a bit, treating The Transporter as his bread-and-butter as he tried on a few different roles. As a nervous middle-aged businessman in London, Statham plays one of his very few normal-person characters, and existing on the margins of that film, he’s quite good. He’s even better in a third re-teaming with Guy Ritchie for the Kabbalah-influenced Revolver. The picture doesn’t make much sense, and it sees Statham as the victim and not the predator, but he seems to have a much easier time with Ritchie’s overwrought, spiritual monologues than co-stars Andre Benjamin, Ray Liotta and Vinny Pastore. It’s a picture that looks great, but ultimately goes nowhere, too self-satisfied and serious to be enjoyable. Ritchie had gone down the rabbit hole, and taken Statham along as his lucky rabbit foot, but only Statham emerged unscathed (though Ritchie overcame horrendous reviews and a broken marriage to direct the Sherlock Holmes pictures).
 
In what may be Statham’s signature role, he found kindred spirits in enfant terribles Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor. Spurred on by video games, cable TV and anime, among other controlled substances, they had dreamed up Chev Chelios, an LA tough guy and hitman who’s been placed in an impossible situation: His heart’s been rigged so that if he can’t keep up his adrenaline, he’ll die. This was a vehicle more for the athleticism of its star moreso than its personality, and Statham wasn’t their first choice for Crank, being somewhat unconvincing as a Los Angeles native. Then again, it’s easily to believe no one would touch their fairly unhinged screenplay, which found Chelios racing across LA, sprinting down busy boulevards, rubbing up on old ladies and embracing the worst of very bad taste.


 
What’s clear about Statham behind the scenes is clear right in front of them: Statham is game for anything. Chelios is an avatar of poor decisions and terrible taste, and playing this part with an extremely straight face, even while barreling down the street with an obvious erection, is going to get the most laughs. Statham’s not Schwarzenegger or Stallone, who tried to “play” the comedy in their sillier films; Statham found the quiet desperation in Chelios, the need to get back to his lady love and seek revenge on his enemies, and understood that making him a man of action (particularly while shooting guerilla-style on some of the more colorful LA neighborhoods) is how to get the most laughs.
 
Statham, modest in intentions, never once came across as anything other than a working actor. His resume only said one thing: “Leading Man Available For Your Action Movie.” Naturally, this led him down the path of working with directors like Uwe Boll and Paul W.S. Anderson. There’s always been a bit of legacy in regards to Statham’s career choices, and it was seen easily in both In The Name Of The King: A Dungeon Siege Tale and Death Race. The former was just a junky throwaway, the type of garbage Boll used to make with big stars and inappropriate budgets before he went off the grid and started making cheaper, more focused pictures. Statham again finds that gravity within the bloat, moreso than co-stars Ray Liotta and Matthew Lillard. It would be telling that a sequel, In The Name Of The King: Two Worlds, would find his modern day descendant played by none other than Dolph Lundgren. It’s not hard to look at Lundgren, squint, and see what Statham’s career could have been.
 
Death Race was a more loaded situation. Here was Statham getting into the shoes of David Carradine, playing a possibly early (possibly not – the mythology is a bit convoluted) version of Frankenstein from Death Race 2000. It’s hard to see how Anderson’s clunky B-movie is in any way similar to the campy, perverse Paul Bartel classic; his motor is built for efficiency, not style, and his remake/prequel lacks the original film’s sense of humor, not to mention any nuance or intelligence. But in the middle of all of it is Statham, for the first time carrying a film with a substantial studio budget. Substantial means something different in Statham’s world – Tom Cruise likely hasn’t made a movie as cheap as Death Race– but he holds the center of a heroic narrative no longer as the invincible superman of his other films, but as the “wronged man” at the center of an A-movie narrative. Statham still comes across as bulletproof (he always will), but it represented a certain shift for the actor. Perhaps an ill-fit (cramming that physique exclusively behind a wheel seems like a mistake), but one that Statham pulled off.
 
Unlike those earlier action stars, however, Statham wasn’t above collaborating. His second teaming with Jet Li wasn’t a fancy studio-pushed clash, but rather a junky genre B-picture called War, a film that bared considerable similarity to the earlier film Chaos, where Statham clashed with Wesley Snipes. The strongest non-Statham film of this period in the late aughts is probably The Bank Job, a true story about a shady robbery that goes cock-eyed. In Roger Donaldson (No Way Out, The Bounty) Statham was working with one of the few serious filmmakers he had yet enjoyed a collaboration with, one who understood that when not in motion, Statham had a working class charm that crossed into mainstream appeal. Statham could be funny, even romantic, but it’s unclear as to whether he, or the industry, had an interest in seeing him in those roles.


 
It’s possible he exerted some influence over The Transporter 3 to this respect, in an attempt to seem more multi-faceted. The Transporter 3 is probably the weakest of the three movies, though it’s not without its charms. The central gimmick – where Frank Martin is essentially bonded to his car, forced to stay within a certain radius or he’ll die – delivers on its promise of chases, near-misses, and clever fighting strategies, all designed to weaken Martin. Most interestingly, it has Statham’s Martin finding love in the arms of Natalya Rudakova’s Valentina, which feels very much like Statham’s answer to the suggestions of Leterrier, who had claimed Martin was gay (Statham refuted this in the press). Still, there’s always been something handsome but asexual about Statham—sleek like a bullet, he could never slow down enough to settle with a woman. Appropriately, Rudakova has only done one other movie since then, and the Transporter series has thus ended.
 
Allegedly, Crank: High Voltage was made at an even lower budget than the first one, allowing Statham and company a chance to embrace the high comedy of the central conceit. In High Voltage, you have the sort of performance that gets ignored by awards committees but shouldn’t. Always game enough to do his own stunts, Statham throws himself into the film, all the dumb jokes, all the violent pratfalls. That’s Statham tied to the back of a motorboat. That’s Statham jumping from level to level in a parking garage. Statham’s elbows and fists are the same quality of acting tools as George Clooney’s smirk or Meryl Streep’s wrinkled brow. Seeing him in High Voltage, one of the weaker box office performers of his career, is to see a man risk life and limb for the sake of entertaining his audience. It’s the moment when Statham, for a brief second, stops being a marquee star and approaches performance art akin to the Jackass crew.
 
Statham has been smart enough to pepper in some ensemble work with his starring roles, but it was The Expendables that revealed he had finally made it. Statham ended up being the only “no-doubt” option for Sylvester Stallone’s mercenary squad of action stars, and it’s interesting that of all the characters in the two Expendables entries, it’s Stallone’s Barney Ross and Statham’s Lee Christmas that have the closest relationship. It’s likely Stallone wishes he could have managed his career quite like this, sacrificing dollars for longevity: Once Stallone started to branch out into comedy and drama, the bottom fell out, a move that Statham isn’t likely to make anytime soon. The nostalgia value is high with The Expendables, seeing these old men sail off into the sunset, guns firing one more time. But Statham, playing the team’s knife specialist (these things exist in these types of films), is an actual thrill himself. While Arnold Schwarzenegger and Bruce Willis show up to provide nostalgia value, Statham comes across as the legit real deal, the legends interacting with a brawler in his prime. Ironically, he’s the one member of the cast best able to toss off a one-liner without looking like he’s cheaply playing for laughs.


 
Unfortunately, without the franchise comfort of Crank and The Transporter, Statham’s career as a leading man has seemingly stalled out. He’s gone hard on action in recent years. Stepping into Charles Bronson’s shoes for a remake of The Mechanic merely got Statham another serviceable action vehicle, albeit one that continued his tradition of hard-hitting R-rated thrill-rides. The casting of Clive Owen and Robert De Niro in Killer Elite seemed like a coup, but the truth was they were consciously signing up for a Statham action picture, and the film was indifferently promoted. By the time Statham was course-correcting with the excellent Safe, easily better than peer Steven Seagal’s early nineties genre classics, the audience wasn’t interested. Going back to England didn’t really work either: Statham’s very good in dramatic roles in both Blitz and Redemption, two smaller-scale British efforts, but they seem uncomfortably poised between “Gritty Drama” and “Jason Statham Action Film” without committing to either.
 
Redemption probably comes the closest to what Statham can offer as an actor. Here, he’s a broken war vet and a homeless man who does the opposite of what a Statham protagonist should do: He tries to pay it forward, finding solace in the fact that the deaths he’s caused are going to be fixed. But the film feels punched up, literally and figuratively with unnecessary action sequences that feel like a mandatory concession to being a “Jason Statham Film.” Which is unfortunate, because his brand has grown weaker with the general public: even Donald Westlake adaptation Parker, supposedly the first film “accurately” featuring that character (though he’s been paid homage frequently), eventually got turned into another solid-but-unspectacular Statham vehicle. There’s no one you’d rather watch break and beat the bad guys, but Statham’s been doing it so long, and so successfully, that we’ve lost the suspense, the thrill, the magic.
 
The last gasp for that may be the recent Homefront. Again it finds Statham standing on the shoulders of giants, working from a script by Sylvester Stallone. But it’s yet another effort where Statham plays an improbably-named man of action (Broker!) who must dismantle an entire network of thugs with brute force. It’s yet another victory for the overdog, pitting Statham as some sort of corn-fed hero against coastal snob James Franco as the opportunistic drug dealer. Both are good, and the movie is great fun, but early notices suggest the public isn’t coming around on the later adventures of Statham. The reaction is similar to the one Clancy Brown’s sheriff has when he sees Broker take down some thugs: Clearly this guy has done this sort of thing before, and he should maybe be left alone to do more of it on his own this time.
 
Statham’s moving into another period of supporting work. A return engagement for The Expendables 3 is on the way, while he’s soon to be in his biggest film yet: playing a villain in the seventh Fast and Furious territory he hasn’t explored since Cellular. It’s telling that Statham’s box office grosses keep dwindling, but his fans are still out there: Statham’s appearance in the post-credits sequence for Furious 6 yielded the kind of cheers that echo in Valhalla. Finally, fans of that racing series cheered, they’ll get to face a real threat.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

It's about time he realized it. Ask Tony, Walt, and Rick: good badguys and bad goodguys is where it's at.

Mob City: Frank Darabont Talks Why Post-War LA is His Favorite Era

$
0
0
InterviewDavid Crow12/2/2013 at 8:54AM

We sit down with Walking Dead creator Frank Darabont to discuss his newest TNT series, Mob City.

As the writer and director of this week’s highly anticipated new TNT series, Mob City, Showrunner Frank Darabont is as big a draw as the series’ noir tone. A creator who got his starts, in of all places, by writing A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors, Darabont quickly graduated from horror movies and television (including The Young Adventures of Indiana Jones) into making full-blown cinema classics. He adapted a little known Stephen King story into his first feature length film: The Shawshank Redemption and followed that up with another King prison yarn turned epic, The Green Mile.
 
More recently, Darabont has returned to his television roots when he created the most popular scripted series currently in the medium with The Walking Dead. Yet, after his abrupt and bizarre departure from that hit and AMC, he soon landed on his feet with an even more seductive genre within film noir. And he brought The Walking Dead'sJon Bernthal along to be the star of Mob City (who we interviewed here last month). It was in promotion of this series that Darabont was kind enough to briefly sit down for a conference call with us in November. Here is that discussion.
 
I know this is based on true events, but I was wondering how did you sort of frame it? It’s fictional drama, but how did you position what’s true and what is not?
 
Frank Darabont: It’s an excellent, excellent question, because this is honestly the loosest adaptation I’ve ever done. It’s not in any way to disregard John Buntin's book, because it really is the inspiration for everything. It’s really a good book, definitely our touchstone. I gave myself license very early on to just make up as much of what I felt we needed to tell the most entertaining, good sort of meaty mob story. Good, pulpy, noir stuff.
 
I mean that’s the promise that I wanted to deliver on, and not turn it into sort of Masterpiece Theater docudrama version of events. So, yeah we’ve thrown caution to the wind on this one. Bless his heart John is abundant; he seems to be definitely enjoying the fact that we’ve done that. So we’re weaving fictional elements very much into the non-fictional historical elements and having a blast doing it.
 
What initially got you interested in that book, and how did you ultimately decide to flip that interest into this series?
 
It was one of those “book by its cover” kind of deals. I was in the newsstand at LAX before jumping on a plane. I poked my head in and I saw this book called L.A. Noir. Noir being right up my alley, and L.A. being a great component of noir, I grabbed the book thinking that it actually might be some fictional thing, and then wound up realizing as I was flying that it was a non-fiction history of this, which actually made the book even cooler to me. I couldn’t put it down for a two days. Once I had read it, I immediately made a call to find out if the rights were available.
 
…So, yeah so I checked into the rights only to discover that my friend Michael De Luca, whom I’ve known since gosh, 1986 when we were--I was on my first produced credit as a writer in Nightmare on Elm Street 3. I met him. He was a young executive just hired by New Line, so we got to be friends on the set of Nightmare 3.
 
I’ve known him all these years. I call him up to find out what he wanted to do with it, and he was excited about my interest. So we decided to partner up on it. It was a real pleasure. It’s been a real pleasure to work with Mike after all these years.


 
What can you say about this time of 1947, the time of the gangster?
 
I’ve always had a tremendous appreciation for past eras. I’ve always had specifically a very keen appreciation for this era in the ‘40s. There was something very sexy and dangerous about it. Plus, it was a much more--what’s the word I’m looking for? It’s in a much more put together era. It’s a much more elegant, and people would dress a certain way.
 
They didn’t just walk out of the house wearing their underwear, or whatever people, you know, wear these days. They had to put thought into it. They presented themselves well. That’s a wonderful thing to put on film because everyone just winds up looking so of the era, but also just of a different world. It’s as unique; visually it’s as unique as a science fiction movie because it is such a different world then.
 
I’ve always loved it. I love the clothes. I love the cars. I love the music. It’s a wonderful period to depict. Challenging of course, because LA has changed so much, but we’re finding those little corners and those little pockets of the old stuff. Then, you know, thankfully with some digital—some careful digital trickery, digital effects—we can enhance the era and make it ever more convincing. I love it, and I’ve always loved the noir genre, because it’s always got an air of dangerous stakes and desperation and everybody’s got an angle, and there’s the dangerous women. You know, you don’t know if they’re on your side or not. I always have loved that kind of storytelling that kind of—that genre and it’s just a pleasure to just roll around in it. I just love it.
 
One of the things that I really love about television shows like this, is the time period it’s set in. As a filmmaker and television fan, I really like this time period for shows and movies, because of the business and the movies that came out at the time. I’m curious as a show creator and a filmmaker, what’s an aspect from that time period that you wish you could’ve experienced?
 
Oh, I wish I could’ve experienced the time period firsthand. You know, I’m glad I’m not 100 years old, but if I had a time machine, and I could punch in a year, it would be post-war [America]. It would be the 1940s. You know, during the war and post-war. It’s just so remarkable what happened and to Los Angeles specifically is so amazing post-war, because the city just started to grow and expand in a way that was unprecedented. It’s still growing and expanding. [It was also a] great opportunity for corruption and mobs and that’s basically what the story is dealing with, that post-war influx of growth and money, and influence, and all that stuff.


 
Can you talk about casting Jon Bernthal in this?
 
You know, when I first started working with Jon some years ago, the first time I worked with him I had the thought in my head, if I ever get to do a noir project, I’m going to want him to play my noir hero. I’m going to want him to play my lead, because he’s got that very period feel to me. He doesn’t come off like a contemporary guy. Plus, he’s got this tremendously quiet, masculinity. It’s not forced; it’s not showboat. But he’s got this very testosterone kind of masculinity that’s quiet, and it’s genuine, and it feels like such a throwback to me to Robert Mitchum and John Garfield.
 
You know, an earlier era of actor, of men, who came up in tougher circumstances during the Great Depression, and fought in those wars, and just had to get through life as best they could without making a big deal out of it. It’s just such a throwback aspect to it. He so reminds me of those guys and those generations.
 
So, for me it was just a self-evident marriage of a certain kind of story that I wanted to tell and this actor who would be so perfect to tell that story.
 
Even though this is a fictional telling of the story, were there any particular elements that you really wanted to make sure to keep historically accurate?
 
Well, even in our historical accuracy we’re taking liberties. So, I always say,  “Thank God it’s not a documentary.” Certainly on the very basic level, on a core level of what [John Buntin] wrote, and what we’re going to be telling is really the focus of the mob versus the police—it really came down to the story of Mickey Cohen versus William Parker.
 
John did a brilliant job of detailing; distilling everything to that dynamic, because it really was the fulcrum point of so many events and the entire power struggle, those two men butting heads. So that’s very much in the long game of the show. I wanted to be very accurate with the fact that Mickey Cohen rises to prominence as the head of the LA mob very much around the time or not too long later William Parker rises to the head of the LAPD.
 
Suddenly, you’ve got these two guys who are running their shops, top of the show in their worlds, and their worlds conflict. Really fascinating set up for storytelling and John Buntin really delineated that so beautifully in his book.

 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Henry Cavill On Ben Affleck’s Casting

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/2/2013 at 11:57AM

Henry Cavill speaks out about Ben Affleck playing Batman and the prospect of working with the Academy Award Winning filmmaker.

Everyone seems to have an opinion on the casting of Ben Affleck as Batman in the upcoming Batman vs. Superman movie, so why not Superman himself? While talking in relation to the recently released Man of Steel Blu-ray and DVD, actor Henry Cavill talked with Total Film long enough to release this little nugget:
 
“I'm sure he'll be fantastic, above all else, and as a filmmaker he's got his own style; he's not copying anyone else. And he's also sort of been tenacious in his career. He's had ups followed by downs, and now he's very up again, and I think that requires and shows a very special strength of character, and it's something I enjoy working with because jobs like this require a strength of character. They require a dedication to the work and a belief in oneself, and Ben has that, clearly.”
 
It is not surprising that he would have such kind words about his upcoming co-stars. However, methinks Superman and Batman’s initial interactions onscreen will not be so cordial.
 
Capes will collide July 17, 2015.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Mia Wasikowska Makes Tracks in Australian Trailer

$
0
0
NewsJennifer Indeck12/2/2013 at 12:38PM

Check out the new trailer of Mia Wasikowska and Adam Driver in the true story of a woman who walked across the Australian Outback.

There is currently no release date in the U.S. for Tracks, but given its star-led cast and the North American rights resting firmly in the hands of The Weinstein Company, this transcendental adventure across the Australian Outback is clearly going to make a splash.
 
Starring Mia Wasikowska of Alice in Wonderland and Stoker as the real-life Robyn Davidson, Tracks chronicles the true story struggles of one young woman who decided to walk on foot (and with four camels, plus her dog!) for 1,700 miles across the Western Australian desert. Set in 1977, the story looks to be marketed in this Australian trailer as both a period piece and a spiritual trip into self-discovery through the boundless glory of nature or some such. Driver plays the National Geographic photographer who tracks Davidson’s exploits.
 
 
For any Aussie geeks, expect the movie in theaters on March 6, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

New Boxtrolls Trailer is Here

$
0
0
NewsTony Davis12/2/2013 at 1:34PM

Check out the trailer for the latest LAIKA stop-motion and CG animation effort, The Boxtrolls.

Stop-motion and CG have made for strange but fascinating bedfellows ever since Coraline let audiences dream (or shiver). And LAIKA is back with a new out-there delirium in The Boxtrolls, a 2014 adventure that takes us into the world of sewer creatures and the cheese that they covet. Check out the new traler, which also doubles as a behind-the-scenes featurette on the animation style below!

 
 
The new 3D stop-motion and CG hybrid animated feature is a comedic fable that unfolds in Cheesebridge, a posh Victorian-era town obsessed with wealth, class, and the stinkiest of fine cheeses. Beneath its charming cobblestone streets dwell the Boxtrolls, foul monsters who crawl out of the sewers at night and steal what the townspeople hold most dear: their children and their cheeses. At least, that’s the legend residents have always believed. In truth, the Boxtrolls are an underground cavern-dwelling community of quirky and lovable oddballs who wear recycled cardboard boxes the way turtles wear their shells.
 
The Boxtrolls have raised an orphaned human boy, Eggs (voiced by Isaac Hempstead-Wright), since infancy as one of their dumpster-diving and mechanical junk-collecting own. When the Boxtrolls are targeted by villainous pest exterminator Archibald Snatcher (Academy Award winner Ben Kingsley), who is bent on eradicating them as his ticket to Cheesebridge society, the kindhearted band of tinkerers must turn to their adopted charge and adventurous rich girl Winnie (Elle Fanning) to bridge two worlds amidst the winds of change – and cheese.
 
The Boxtrolls stars Ben Kingsley, introducing Isaac Hempstead-Wright, Elle Fanning, Jared Harris, Toni Collette, Nick Frost, Richard Ayoade, Tracy Morgan, and Simon Pegg.
 
It will be released on September 26, 2014.

 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

Its still a whole year away?


Watch All the MST3K Turkey Day Segments Right Here!

$
0
0
NewsMike Cecchini12/2/2013 at 2:41PM

Missed Mystery Science Theater 3000 Turkey Day? That's alright...you can still see a compilation of every Thanksgiving related segment, bumper, and extra that they aired between the movies!

Another Thanksgiving has come and gone, and as usual, the feelings of regret on Monday that follow. Ah, but this time, we're not talking about the regret one gets from eating too much or rooting for the Lions (who actually won this year), but it's the regret that comes from not being able to watch Mystery Science Theater 3000's Turkey Day, which was resurrected this year for the first time in...well...a long time. But we've got your fix! 

You can watch every between-movie segment from this year's MST3K Turkey Day marathon right here! This not only includes Joel Hodgson's NEW segments, but classics from years past, and a promo/commercial used to help sell Mystery Science Theater 3000 on KTMA, back before its Comedy Central days.

[related article: Celebrate MST3K's 25th Anniversary With Unaired Pilot Episode]

And in case you want to do your own bit of MST3K marathoning, these are the movies they showed: 

Space Mutiny

I Accuse My Parents

Werewolf

Cave Dwellers

The Final Sacrifice

Mitchell

Thanks to the official MST3K Facebook Page for putting us on to this one and YouTube user Tyrantulas for putting the video up!

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

Ah, Mitchell was last? Nice. I went out and did things at the behest of my friends. Bah!

The Wolfman Transforms into NBC Series

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/2/2013 at 6:37PM

The story of Larry Talbot and his lycanthrope alter-ego shall live again on NBC from the executive producer and head writer of Dracula!

The Wolfman (2010) may not have launched the film franchise that Universal Pictures originally hoped, but it shall live again in the light of a televised full moon.
 
It has been learned that Daniel Knauf, the executive producer and head writer of NBC’s Dracula will be spearheading the attempt to transform the story of a man who is pure and says his prayers by night into a serialized horror drama.
 
This would place The Wolfmanas part of NBC’s Friday night supernatural power block. The network’s Friday is still built around the hit gothic procedural Grimm, but this would also appear to give a vote of confidence to its newest companion piece, Dracula starring Jonathan Rhys Meyers in the titular role.
 
It is reported that the series is based on the 2010 film produced by Scott Stuber, who is also serving as producer on the series. The story will pick up on the harrowing journey of Lawrence Talbot, an American in London (or at least Victorian England) who has been cursed with the mark of the werewolf when he returned home following his brother’s untimely death. The previous film starred Benicio Del Toro as the titular lycanthrope and Anthony Hopkins as his father. The film itself is a remake of the 1941 horror classic The Wolf Man, which starred Lon Chaney Jr. and Claude Raines in the same roles. It is unclear how the plot will exactly connect to those incarnations.
 
SOURCE: Deadline

 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Bourne 5 release date confirmed

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew12/3/2013 at 8:32AM

Jeremy Renner is set to return for the next Bourne movie, in the summer of 2015...

The once-crowded blockbuster summer of 2015 is looking a little less packed than it once was. Independence Day 2Star Wars: Episode VII and Pirates Of The Caribbean 5 are amongst the films that have vacated it so far. And whilst Ant-Man has moved in, there's still likely to be some jiggling to do before the finally line-up for summer 2015 at the movies is confirmed.

And you can add the follow-up to The Bourne Legacy to the list, too. Universal has confirmed that Bourne 5 is going to be released on August 14th 2015, and that Justin Lin - the man behind lots of Fast & Furious movies - is set to direct.

Jeremy Renner will be back as Aaron Cross in the new movie, although the rest of the casting is some way off being confirmed.

Universal has also revealed a release date for Luc Besson's upcoming movie, Lucy. This is a movie where Scarlett Johansson will play what's described as a "merciless warrior evolved beyond human logic". Not much else is known about the movie other than that, but we now know we can expect it on August 8th 2014.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

George Miller on Mad Max: Fury Road delay, Mel Gibson

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew12/3/2013 at 8:35AM

Director George Miller explains Mad Max: Fury Road's 2015 release date, and addresses the Mel Gibson cameo rumour...

Eyebrows were raised when Warner Bros finally announced a release date for the fourth Mad Max movie, Mad Max: Fury Road, and it turned out that the movie was still well over a year away. In spite of the fact that the movie finished its main block of shooting some time ago, we're not going to get to see it until May 15th 2015. However, chatting to the Sydney Morning Herald, director George Miller has now explained why.

"Our movie. luckily after a ridiculous amount of work, is testing extremely well. We're very happy", he said. "There has been a lot of doubt about it ... but Warners have delayed it until 2015 to go into the top weekend of the year".

That's not yhe only reason for the delay, though. It also seems that Warner Bros didn't want it to be released in 2014, for fear of having to compete against the football World Cup. Doing so wouldn't hurt US takings too much, but could do a lot of damage elsewhere in the world.

Miller, incidentally, also addressed rumours of a Mel Gibson cameo in the movie. "It would have been nice somehow, but no it's not true".

Miller is finishing up some additional filming on the movie at the moment, but will finally wrap production in the next two weeks. Charlize Theron and Tom Hardy star in the movie, and Miller is likely to spend a good chunk of 2014 in an edit suite, tuning it to his liking. More on the movie as we hear it...

Sydney Morning Herald.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

Geez, no Mel. How can I possibly enjoy this? I'll give it a shot but when an established actor playing the same role over 3 movies is absent…well it will be hard to suspend my belief for 2 hours. Anyone else?

I'm happy with the series going on, but, they should have just made a sequel talking place in the same world and not a recast. I like Tom Hardy, he just doesn't have the charisma and screen presence of Mel.

JJ Abrams on hiding Benedict Cumberbatch's Star Trek role

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew12/3/2013 at 8:36AM

JJ Abrams looks back at attempts to keep Star Trek Into Darkness spoilers under wraps, and his slight regret at doing so...

The story contains spoilers for Star Trek Into Darkness.

By the time Benedict Cumberbatch's character, John Harrison, finally revealed himself to be Khan in last summer's Star Trek Into Darkness, a pretty constant war had been raging for months to keep the spoiler under wraps. Director JJ Abrams was one of a few who had been relatively adamant that Cumberbatch wouldn't be playing Khan in the movie. And in a new interview with MTV, he's chatted about why - even when strong rumours started to circulate - they continued to protect the identity of Cumberbatch's role.

"The truth is because it was so important to the studio that we not angle this thing for existing fans. If we said it was Khan, it would feel like you've really got to know what Star Trek is about to see this movie", Abrams said. That didn't stop Paramount ruining the surprise to an extent by listing Cumberbatch as Khan on the back of the DVD and Blu-ray packaging for Star Trek Into Darkness though.

"I can understand their argument to try to keep that quiet, but I do wonder if it would have seemed a little bit lees like an attempt at deception if we had just come out with it", he admitted. "The truth is that I think it probably would have been smarter just to say up front 'this is who it is'. It was only trying to preserve the fun of it, and it might have given more time to acclimate and accept that's what the thing was".

In truth, it's hard to say it's a bad thing that the team behind a movie worked so hard to keep a spoiler under wraps. The other thing we'd note is that at the screenings of Star Trek Into Darkness we went to, nobody seemed in the slightest bit surprised when the reveal came. But then, were they all onto a loser from the start in trying to protect their secret?

It matters not now, of course. But we'd be quite happy if Abrams continued to try and protect plot and character spoilers for his films.

As for a director for the next Star Trek movie, Abrams didn't shoot down the rumour that Attack The Block's Joe Cornish was the man in the frame. "I don't know if Joe Cornish is the guy. My guess is that's up in the air. I adore him and love him and can't wait to see what he does next", Abrams said.

More on the next Star Trek movie as we hear it...

MTV.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

They didn't "hide" anything. They lied to our faces, even when asked a direct question.

We're talking about a spoiler and possibly ruining the surprise for many fans! Not some politician who cheated on his taxes or was involved in an affair.

what surprise

everyone guessed who he was
it was a dumb twist then and now

Who cares if they hid it? Worst thing was how much the movie sucked.

I didn't guess it and in fact it was a real surprise for me. Not good or bad but a surprise. The moral here is: We're all different.

Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>