Quantcast
Channel: Movies – Den of Geek
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live

New Viral Pictures From Edge of Tomorrow

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/9/2013 at 12:23PM

Check out new pictures from the Edge of Tomorrow's embedded news feed of alien invasion and war!

Reporting from the frontlines can be horrifying. And when you’re up against monstrous aliens who’ve come to harvest earth, it’s simply out of this world awful. Thus when the Twitter account Embedded UDF, the official viral account for Warner Brothers’ Edge of Tomorrow, starts sending reports from Verdun, France about the world falling to smoke and ruin, you know the planet’s resistance is in trouble. They also helpfully sent these stills from the Tom Crusie and Emily Blunt starring summer 2014 blockbuster:
 




 
In the future, an inexperienced military commander (Tom Cruise) must lead his men into a suicide mission of a battle…resulting in their instant deaths. But when Lt. Col. Bill Cage wakes up, he is alive and forced to relive the battle again. Each day brings a new challenge as he fights to stay alive. Also starring Emily Blunt as Special Forces officer Rita, the film is directed by Doug Liman (The Bourne Identity, Mr. & Mrs. Smith) and will be released on June 6, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Production Title For Terminator Reboot Revealed

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/9/2013 at 12:58PM

The production office for Alan Taylor's Terminator reboot has the film slated as Terminator: Genesis.

Despite director Alan Taylor still not officially confirmed to helm the picture, and the casting of heroic Sarah Connor still up in the air between Emilia Clarke and Brie Larson, the July 2015 scheduled Terminator reboot presses along like a dauntless T-1000. And it brings us to the latest bit of intrigue: is Terminator: Genesis the new title?
 
As revealed via Production Weekly’s Twitter feed, it would appear that Terminator: Genesisis the name of the project currently still in pre-production. It should be noted that Production Weekly is a reliable periodical about the nuts and bolts of production work in Hollywood, as opposed to a salacious gossip mill, and they rather matter of factly report that the production office for “Alan Taylor’s Terminator: Genesis” is now open. This would also count as even more concrete evidence that Taylor is helming the project despite current studio language.
 
Keep in mind that titles are subject to change and that the film is still in the early process. There is yet to be word on who will play the new series’ Kyle Reese or John Connor, the latter of whom is expected to feature in a larger part than he did in the 1984 original. Also, Taylor (Thor: The Dark World) is supposedly leaning toward his Game of Thrones leading lady, Ms. Clarke, but it could still be the indie darling of Short Term 12 in one Ms. Larson who gets the coveted part. It has also been revealed that Skydance Productions and Annapurna Pictures are also trying to thread a new spin-off TV series into the reboot's universe as well.
 
The only immovable confirmation is that the franchise will be back…on July 2, 2015 to be precise.
 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

Why would they want another reboot TV show of the series? They had an awesome one a few years ago, with ANOTHER Game of Thrones person (Lena Heady) playing Sara Connor, which was a GREAT show until Fox canclled it after 2 seasons. If anything bring that show back!

I thought the show was a bore.

They need to stop rebooting TV shows and movies of a once successful franchise.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Releasing in IMAX 3D

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/9/2013 at 1:43PM

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 will swing into IMAX and IMAX 3D screenings on May 2, 2014; Spidey will also make an appearance with new footage in Times Square for New Year's Eve.

In what should be joyous (and expected) news for many a web-head, Sony Pictures has announced that the highly anticipated wallcrawling sequel The Amazing Spider-Man 2 will be swinging into IMAX and IMAX 3D screens upon its release. Announced alongside IMAX Corporation, the news promises to offer viewers the chance to see the latest Spider-Man movie in the dimensonial format of their choice.
 
Also revealed today in The New York Daily News is a confirmation that the web-slinger will appear in Times Square for News Year’s Eve this December. As countless revelers gather to celebrate annual ball drop, they will be treated on giant TV screens (along with viewers at home) to new footage from The Amazing Spider-Man 2.
 
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 finds Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) fighting for his life against Oscorp’s newest freaks, including Electro (Jamie Foxx) and Rhino (Paul Giamatti), all while trying to balance a high school romance with Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone). Yet, when an old friend named Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan) comes back into his life, the secrets of Norman Osborn (Chris Cooper) and its villainous past reach closer to home than even Spidey can realize. Worse still, they may expand into his future.
 
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 opens May 2, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Ridley Scott Options YA Series Fae for Adaptation

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/9/2013 at 2:25PM

Ridley Scott is set to produce Fae, the story of a 16-year-old girl who must decide the fate of humanity between Light and Dark. Could the director of Legend be feeling that old magic?

In a world where The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is poised to surpass Iron Man 3 at the box office (at least domestically), YA is back in vogue. Despite a wee bit of hand-wringing in the trades only a few months ago, everyone wants to catch The Girl on Fire, and who better to launch another one of these potential franchises than Ridley Scott, the man who pushed female heroines before it was cool?!
 
As the director of films like Alien, Thelma and Louise, and Prometheus, Scott has shown interest in placing strong female leads in genre scenarios. Enter Fae, a new fantasy book series aimed at a young adult demographic by sibling authors Colet and Jasmine Abedi. The book, the first part in a trilogy (the second of which, The Dark King, has yet to be published) tells the story of Caroline Ellis, a 16-year-old girl who on her birthday must choose between the forces of Light and Dark Fae, just as her boyfriend Devilyn Reilly finds the dark within. Their battle, particularly Ellis’, shall decide the fate of humanity.
 
Deadline is reporting that Ridley Scott has optioned the screen rights for the film and will produce the movie alongside Giannina Facio. It is currently unclear whether Scott will direct the picture, but despite its teen focus, it is not inconceivable. After all, he once tried his hand at fantasy in the memorably stunning, if ponderous, Legend. That film too dealt with fairies, as well as goblins, unicorns, demons and an awesome performance from Tim Curry as Darkness. Scott has already revisited science fiction, so this could be right up his alley for giving another look.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Watch This Mysterious Godzilla Movie Teaser!

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/9/2013 at 2:57PM

The viral marketing campaign for Godzilla is starting to pick up in advance of our first real look at the trailer. Who the heck are M.U.T.O. research?

There isn't all that much to this thirteen second video that's part of the viral marketing campaign for the new Godzilla movie, but it's still kinda neat. Gareth Edwards' fresh start for the Godzilla franchise opens on May 16th, and the first official trailer is scheduled to hit along with The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug later this week.


Until then, see what you can glean from this little snippet, and then head over to the very cool mutoresearch.net site, which makes very little sense, but has some cool and ominous general giant monster, kaiju, and Godzilla vibes going for it!

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


New American Hustle Clip with Bradley Cooper and Amy Adams

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/9/2013 at 3:49PM

Check out the latest American Hustle clip where Amy Adams and Bradley Cooper match wit on who is hustling who.

Hustling can be hard, but somehow Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Bradley Cooper and Jennifer Lawrence always make it look easy. The stars of David O. Russell’s American Hustle, which just walked away with the New York Critics Circle Best Picture title earlier this month, is one of the most anticipated movies of the holiday season with its platformed release over the next two weeks making Russell fans ready to do the electric slide. In the meantime, here is a new clip from the picture which shows Cooper’s FBI agent DiMaso trying to win over Sydney Prosser (Adams) to his side in a sting operation with more changing sides than a Rubik’s Cube. But just who is playing who in this scene?
 
 
American Hustle opens in New York and Los Angeles on December 13 and nationwide on December 20.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Watch the Trailer for Jupiter Ascending

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/9/2013 at 7:48PM

The new science fiction movie from the Wachowskis stars Mila Kunis and Channing Tatum and it looks positively gorgeous!

The new flick from the Wachowskis is as slick and heavy on the killer sci-fi imagery you'd expect. Jupiter Ascending opens on July 25th, 2014 and stars Mila Kunis and Channing Tatum engaged in some genetic sci-fi opera action that sounds seriously weird and thoroughly cool. Throw in Sean Bean for some geek cred and Cloud Atlas (and Iron Man 3) cinematographer John Toll for some stellar visuals, and Jupiter Ascending starts looking pretty good, doesn't it?

Enough of our ramblings...watch it here!

Here's the official plot synopsis, as well: "Jupiter Jones (Mila Kunis) was born under a night sky, with signs predicting that she was destined for great things. Now grown, Jupiter dreams of the stars but wakes up to the cold reality of a job cleaning toilets and an endless run of bad breaks. Only when Caine (Channing Tatum), a genetically engineered ex-military hunter, arrives on Earth to track her down does Jupiter begin to glimpse the fate that has been waiting for her all along – her genetic signature marks her as next in line for an extraordinary inheritance that could alter the balance of the cosmos."

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

This is why no movie will ever reach the perfection of Blade Runner. Vfx in movies are now hitting another type of "uncanny valley"; making something look real does not equal to a good movie!

It all begins with a good script.

same thing happened with video games

What was that? It gave a lot of video clips in random order, yet no storyline or a reason to exist.

Jason Momoa signing up for Batman Vs Superman

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew12/10/2013 at 7:53AM

The star of the Conan reboot, Jason Momoa, is on the radar for Zack Snyder's Batman Vs Superman project...

The cast of Zack Snyder's upcoming Batman Vs Superman movie looks like it's got another body on board, as it's being reported that Jason Momoa is now in talks about joining the movie.

Momoa, whose highest profile roles thus far have seen him headline the Conan remake, and also appear in Game Of Thrones, is apparently set to play either Doomsday or the Martian Manhunter in the movie. The exact role remains guarded, but those are the two possibles that are being widely mooted.

Momoa joins a cast that also includes Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Gal Gadot, Amy Adams and Laurence Fishburne. The movie itself is released on July 17th 2015.

The Hollywood Reporter.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

I could see him for either one of those roles.

Whaaat? This project is spinning out of control. First it was Man of Steel 2, a week after MOS's opening week. Then it was Superman vs Batman. Then it was Superman vs Batman and oh, Wonder Woman Too. Now ANOTHER CHARACTER!? Just announce a Justice League movie already. By the time JL finally gets announced, there is going to be no glamour or excitement for the movie, because MOS2 was basically Justice league.

The word from the guy who runs batman on film & who is very close with WB(and who will NEVER give us ANY spoiler info) is that he knows who the villains are & that Momoa will be playing a Superman canon villain--so that rules out MM, but does leave roles like Mongol & Doomsday(hopefully not) as possibilities--Im sure there are more that Im not thinking of that he might play, but when I think big & fierce those 2 come to mind & I think its too early to introduce Darkseid as a major villain--Im guessing he will be "saved" for the JL movie unless this turns into one

Yeah there's either gonna be a crap ton of cameos, or we're basically looking at JLA. Or a reaaaaaaaally long post-credits scene. ;)

I can't see him as anything really... Maybe Lobo?


Tom Cruise to return for Jack Reacher sequel

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew12/10/2013 at 7:54AM

Paramount wants a sequel to last year's Jack Reacher movie, with Tom Cruise once again set to star...

Last year's Jack Reacher movie was worth it in our book for one of the most brilliantly bizarre villain performances of recent times. We're talking about Werner Herzog's brief but impactful turn in the movie. That, and the excellent opening sequence, remain highlights of the movie.

Jack Reacher didn't do badly at the box office either, pulling in a worldwide gross of $218m. That might not sound a lot in the days of Marvel movies routinely breezing past $500m, but Jack Reacher cost an economical $57m to make. And whilst Tom Cruise's performance in the title role didn't win over every fan of Lee Childs' books, the project remains something of a success.

Christopher McQuarrie directed Jack Reacher, and he's now reuniting with Tom Cruise on Mission: Impossible 5. But once that's done, it looks like it's full speed ahead on Jack Reacher 2.

The plan is to adapt the book Never Go Back as the basis of the next movie, which is the latest novel in the long-running series. The plan, if he wants it, is to give McQuarrie the directing gig again, although he's not going to have time to write the screenplay this time.

When we hear more about who is on screenplay duties, we'll let you know....

Source.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Watch the First Trailer For Godzilla Right Here!

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/10/2013 at 1:04PM

It's about time that the King of the Monsters stomped his way back into theaters, and we've got the first official trailer (and the poster) for the 2014 Godzilla reboot right here!

Gareth Edwards' Godzilla reboot has been shrouded in secrecy for quite some time now. There have been some clever bits of viral marketing, and there was a trailer shown (and briefly leaked) around the 2013 San Diego Comic-Con. But the rest of the world's kaiju fans have had to hold our collective breath and wait to see what the new Godzilla movie would bring us. That's all over now, as the first official trailer for Godzilla has stomped its way onto the internet...and into our hearts. Alright, maybe not our hearts, but you get the point. Watch it here!

 

Godzilla stars future Avengers stars Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Elizabeth Olsen and Breaking Bad anti-hero Breaking Bad. It will demolish the box office starting on May 16, 2014. Oh, and check out this poster, too!

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

That was surprisingly very good.

Andrew Garfield May Not Return for a Fourth Spidey

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/10/2013 at 2:43PM

Andrew Garfield says that he does not know if he'll be in a fourth Spidey film and that at the moment, it's not "anything to do with me."

With The Amazing Spider-Man 2 trailer being very well received by the fans, it feels pretty likely that Garfield has successfully secured himself in the role of Peter Parker. Yet that may always not be the case. Consider that when Sony announced not only an Amazing Spider-Man 3, but also an Amazing Spider-Man 4, in 2016 and 2018, respectively, it surprised everyone, including director Marc Webb and Garfield.
 
And today, Yahoo! revealed during a set visit that the news is still a bit early for diehards to celebrate. While discussing that shock announcement, Garfield seemed genuinely disconcerted about the news.
 
“I mean I’m under contract for another one after this…as for a fourth one? That’s not anything to do with me,” Garfield said in the interview. “But yeah, I  think what we’re doing here is we’ve established the world, and now we get to really play inside that world.”
 
The soundbyte is obviously curious for Spidey fans, as it could mean another web-head recast in the very near future. However, the key words to take away for the moment is “I’m under contract for another one…” Somehow, I suspect that Sony would not announce a fourth film if they did not have confidence that they could keep their star that long. This should be at least potentially considered as a form of public negotiation for a new contract in regards to a fourth film.
 
Garfield also candidly spoke about some of the possible missteps in The Amazing Spider-Man (2012), and how the sequel will really allow them to open the franchise up in a more exciting way.
 
Says Garfield, “I think there was something missing in the first one because our focus wasn’t on character as much we were trying to keep a number of plates spinning in the air – How can we reintroduce the character? How do we not upset this guy or this guy? That was a tough wasteland we had to move through.”
 
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 swings into theaters May 2, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

First TV Spot for The Legend of Hercules

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/10/2013 at 3:16PM

Watch the first TV spot of Renny Harlin's Herculean epic right here.

The first TV spot for Renny Harlin’s The Legend of Hercules (formerly “Hercules: The Legend Begins”) is here. Revealed today by Summit Entertainment, the spot gives fans plenty to feast on as the Greco epic approaches.
 
 
The Legend of Hercules is directed by Renny Harlin (Exorcist: The Beginning, Die Hard 2) and stars Kellan Lutz as the legendary demigod of Greek mythology. In this version, the son of Zeus is betrayed by his king and sold into slavery, from which he must wage battle for the freedom to return to the woman he loves, Princess Hebe of Crete (Gaia Weiss). And if that doesn’t sound enough like Starz’s take on Spartacus to you, keep in mind that they have cast the network’s second Spartacus, Liam McIntyre in the film! Plus, they've added Game of Thrones' Roxanne McKee (the slave who "educated" Khaleesi) in it as well! Action geek icon Scott Adkins is also in attendance for the Greco throwdowns.
 
The Legend of Hercules truly begins on January 10, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

Meh.

Dawn of the Planet of the Apes Moved Up a Week

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/10/2013 at 3:41PM

Dawn of the Planet of the Apes has moved to July 11...the dubiously slated release date for Fast & Furious 7.

The Dawn of the Planet of the Apes appears to be cracking a bit earlier than expected in 2014, as 20th Century Fox quietly moves the film from its previous July 18, 2014 release date to July 11, 2014.
 
This may be cause for celebration for Ape fans highly anticipating director Matt Reeves’ (Cloverfield, Let Me In) follow-up to the 2011 surprise hit. However, it truthfully comes on a sad note. As Universal Pictures has indefinitely halted production on Fast & Furious 7 following the tragic death of actor Paul Walker, the likelihood of the James Wan film meeting its July 11 release date is appearing increasingly dubious. And while the studio nor the filmmakers have revealed how their hastened plans in finding a work-around for this situation, it is apparent that one is necessary. Enter Dawn of the Planet of the Apessubtly taking the first weekend following the July 4th holiday.
 
We’ll keep you posted on where Fast & Furious 7 will land in all this.
 
SOURCE: ComingSoon
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Saving Mr. Banks Archival iBook Now Available

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/10/2013 at 4:40PM

A new iOS feature allows Disney fans to go behind the scenes of the upcoming Saving Mr. Banks and into the real sketches, audio recordings and video that brought Walt Disney and P.L. Travers together on Mary Poppins.

This weekend, Disney fans and those who are nostalgic for a little chimney sweeping will be able to see Tom Hanks and Emma Thompson recreate the infamous wrangling involved with Walt Disney (Hanks) getting writer P.L. Travers (Thompson) into allowing his adaptation of her classic character Mary Poppins.
 
However, for those who want a deeper inside look at how that process really appeared, Disney has released a new application for iOS users to experience with real archival footage, sketches and recordings of the process that brought about this unlikely partnership and the many famous voices in-between, including the songwriting duo Sherman brothers.
 
Watch the trailer below for further insight into what this feature can offer.
 
 
Saving Mr. Banks opens in select cities on December 13, 2013 and in wide release on December 20.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Tron Writer Jesse Wigutow Adapting Brian Michael Bendis’ Fire

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/10/2013 at 4:57PM

The writer for the still-upcoming Tron 3 has been tapped to adapt Brian Michael Bendis' graphic novel Fire, which is intended to be a star vehicle for Zac Efron.

Though Tron 3 has yet to move forward over at Disney, that has not stopped its screenwriter, Jesse Wigutow, from finding more geek friendly material to work with.
 
Deadline is reporting that Universal Pictures has tapped Wigutow to pen a big screen adaptation for Brian Michael Bendis’ well-respected graphic novel series, Fire. The film was announced three years ago and has become a pet project for star Zac Efron who has remained attached to star in the film.
 
Published by Icon Comics, Bendis’ book tells the story of a college student (Efron) who is fabulously recruited by the CIA into becoming a spook. It is a world of possibilities for the kid until he realizes that he is in a program that churns out “expendable” spies. On the bright side, he won’t have to ever worry about making a 401k.
 
The deal was sold by Bendis and Efron at Sundance in 2011 to Universal Pictures. Fast & Furious 7’s Neal H. Moritz and Toby Jaffe are set to produce.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Director found for World War Z 2

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew12/11/2013 at 8:43AM

The man who brought The Impossible and The Orphanage to the screen, Juan Antonio Bayona, signs up for Brad Pitt's World War Z sequel.

There's a sporting chance that the sequel to this year's World War Z movie is going to be moving ahead sooner rather than later, with the news now that a director has already been found for the project. It was little secret by the end of the first shoot that star and producer Brad Pitt wasn't seeing eye to eye with World War Z director Marc Forster, and thus it's been known for a while that the latter wouldn't be back for the next movie.

The job instead has gone to Juan Antonio Bayona. He's most recently directed The Impossible, and before that he made The Orphanage. He's been brought onto World War Z 2 relatively early, as he's also going to be overseeing the writing process for the movie. As it stands, no writers are known to have been recruited, so it may be a while yet before we see the movie.

We suspect 2016 will be the earliest we might see the movie, but as always, we'll keep you posted as we find out more...

The Hollywood Reporter.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

How Natural Born Killers changed product placement

$
0
0
FeatureSimon Brew12/11/2013 at 8:44AM

Not all publicity is good publicity, as Coca Cola found out in Natural Born Killers, a film that changed the way brands worked with movies

In Jane Hamsher's excellent book, Killer Instinct, the producer charts the difficult path she and Don Murphy had in bringing Natural Born Killers to the big screen. Natural Born Killers was, of course, originally a Quentin Tarantino screenplay, one that changed dramatically when Oliver Stone signed up to direct the movie.

Tarantino sold the rights to the movie for $10,000 after he'd tried to set the project up himself - this was before the Oscar-winning success of Pulp Fiction - and would regret the decision. That said, rumours that he held animosity towards Oliver Stone himself were just that. In interviews since, Tarantino has always been respectful towards him.

Back to Killer Instinct, though. There are a couple of passages in the book which relate to the way product placement was used in the movie. Firstly, Hamsher reports how one particular shot was required in exchange for free pairs of cowboy shoes for some of those making the movie. The trade off was that the brand name of said shoes was on the side of a truck that needed to be included. Stone included the shot.

But the part of the movie that was going to have further ramifications for how product placement was approached in the movies was mainly around the sitcom segment, I Love Mallory. This is where Juliette Lewis' character in the movie appears alongside Rodney Dangerfield. It's a divisive scene (Tarantino describes it as the moment he turned the movie off), where Stone shifts the tone of the movie, but not the content. As such, by putting a sitcom laughing track behind the exploration of Mallory's hugely unpleasant father, Stone makes uneasy switch about what we laugh at in a sanitised entertainment context, using incredibly dark humor to do so.

You might not like the scene, but it's an interesting approach. And then, pretty much straight after it, there's an ad for Coca-Cola. If you were one of the many who sat there at the time of watching the movie wondering why on earth The Coca-Cola Company agreed to that, then you were not alone. Certain executives at The Coca-Cola Company more than shared your view. The famous Coca-Cola polar bear ad was used on more than one occasion throughout the movie, mainly when Stone was making switch about violence, 

So how did it happen? It's a simple question, with a simple answer: the Natural Born Killers team asked, The Coca-Cola Company said yes. What The Coca-Cola Company didn't do, crucially, was watch the movie in time, or apparently insist that they saw it before it was released.

As the Associated Press reported back in August 1994, "Coca-Cola thought that the spot was to be used in a scene in which Tommy Lee Jones watched the Super Bowl on television. Instead, the commercial is interspersed with images such as a headless, bloody body. The spots were used three times in the movie, intercut with brutal images of mayhem".

A statement issued from The Coca-Cola Company back in 1994, with no penchant for understatement, went on to say that "we're concerned that our commercial is being used in a way we didn't intend and weren't aware of".

It would be the last time that Coca-Cola took such a relaxed view to product placement in movies and television. Before then, it had been used to positive appearances in the likes of JawsSuperman and Superman II. Its agreement with the producers of Natural Born Killers was based on similar thinking, clearly. Said agreement appears so watertight that it can't now get its commercial removed from further releases of the movie.

Oliver Stone himself admits on the commentary track for the movie that The Coca-Cola Company board of directors was "furious" when it saw the finished movie, and how its branding had been used to punctuate key moments of the movie. This clearly wasn't the vision that the firm had when it got involved with movies. At one stage after all, The Coca-Cola Company owned Columbia Pictures, eventually selling the movie business to Sony in 1989. It does make it all just a little more surprising. After all, this wasn't a company with no experience of films and how they worked.

And yet Natural Born Killers was testament to the way product placement was seen back in the early 1990s. The Coca-Cola Company formalised its processes in the aftermath of Natural Born Killers, and many big brands heeded the same lesson. Processes were put in place, and companies suddenly became a lot more guarded about how their brands were used in the movies.

Arguably as a consequence of this, the product placement business mushroomed. Because both studios and brands worked out how this could be mutually beneficial, if put on a more formal footing. It wasn't as if money hadn't changed hands before in exchange for brand names appearing in films - although a lot of product placement back then was actually free of charge - but the proverbial goalposts most certainly shifted. Product placement became more controlled and sought after, from both sides of the fence.

In 2000 for instance, just six years later, The Coca-Cola Company actively sponsored a Warner Bros TV show by the name of Young Americans. The show didn't last, but the sign that things had changed came when a scene in it was reshot because a Pepsi machine was in the background at one stage. The Coca-Cola Company had gone from a business that had blindly signed off the use of one of its iconic commercials, to one that was examining the deployment of its branding in minute detail.

Should all of this change be laid at the door of Natural Born Killers? No, of course not. But it's hard not to see Oliver Stone's movie as a catalyst for change. The sheer exposure the Coca-Cola ads got from their positioning in that movie was an eye-opener, and it led to brands being far, far more controlling of their message. For a long time, trust was out of the window.

Consequently, studios were alive to the impact such product placements would have, and it's now a given that product placement can take the edge off the price of a particularly high blockbuster movie budget. Just check out Man Of Steel: Warner Bros lured in Budweiser, iHop, CNN, Sears, Nokia and many more. According to reports, such 'commercial partnerships' (that's the current terminology) brought in over $160m. In all, over 100 contracts with 'global marketing partners' were signed for Man Of Steel, and product placement made up a solid amount of those.

It's certainly a lot different from 1994. And while the collision of Natural Born Killers and The Coca-Cola Company had been coming, that it was those two that collided - on such a controversial movie anyway - was the key variable. Yet so laid back was product placement in movie theater, even in the early 1990s, that something was soon going to give. It did, and the ramifications do continue to be felt. It's telling that no company has been caught out the same way again.

For The Coca-Cola Company at least though, the reminder of the cost of not properly checking how product placement is being deployed remains present every time a Natural Born Killers disc is sold, or the movie is screened somewhere. It's proven to be a very hard lesson, and one that, in some small way, started a sea change in how movies, televisions and big brand products would work with each other. We suspect, too, that it didn't help sell too many cans of Coke at the time...

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

A closer look at the trailer for Gareth Edwards' Godzilla

$
0
0
FeatureRyan Lambie12/11/2013 at 8:45AM

The first trailer for Gareth Edwards' Godzilla landed yesterday. We take a closer look at its finer details...

Next year marks the 60th birthday of Godzilla, Japan's most famous giant monster. The star of around 30 increasingly outlandish movies, a 1998 US remake, a cartoon series and a mountain of merchandise, it's easy to forget that Gojira (to give him his original Japanese name) wasn't conceived as a familiar figure of fun, but a city-leveling creature to be feared.

Director Gareth Edwards stated some time ago that he intended to reinstate Godzilla's power to inspire a sense of fear and awe in his forthcoming reboot, timed to coincide with the grand Kaiju's birthday next year. And it's clear from the first few seconds of the movie's new trailer that Edwards has already gone some way towards achieving that.

Like the teaser trailer shown off at Comic-Con two years ago, the new promo uses the eerie Monolith theme from Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey as a backwash for its images. This may be because the finished score isn't finished yet, but we're half hoping they use something like it in the final movie - it gives the firey visuals a perfectly apocalyptic tone.

In some ways, the Godzilla trailer's perfectly conventional: we're given a brief introduction to some of the leading players - Aaron Taylor Johnson, Juliette Binoche, Bryan Cranston and Elizabeth Olsen are all glimpsed - an idea of the movie's events, and finally a glimpse of the lumbering beast himself. But what's unusual about the Godzilla trailer is how carefully its shots are chosen, and how little they give away when you really look at them in turn.

The opening sequence, a series of shots depicting the briefing and execution of a military skydive over a city, sets the trailer's ominous tone and introduces Johnson's Lieutenant Ford, here looking apprehensive (as we would) ahead of the leap.

Exactly why Lieutenant Ford and his pal soldiers are leaping from a plane isn't clear. In the 1955 Japanese sequel Godzilla Raids Again, flares are used to lead Godzilla towards the sea. Is something similar going on here, with the red trails left by the soldiers designed to attract the monster, or are they attempting something different?

It's an interesting lead-in to the promo in any case, since most trailers are designed to reflect a finished movie's opening act rather than an event from what we're guessing is its mid-section. The trailer for the 1998 Godzilla, for example, showed off the scarred fishing boats and beached cargo ships which hailed the creatures arrival.

By contrast, Godzilla 2014 gives no obvious clue as to where Godzilla comes from or where he'll first attack. We've heard elsewhere that Godzilla won't be the product of an atomic bomb, as in the 1954 original, but as the result of some other, more contemporary form of ecological catastrophe. Is he the result of a military experiment, as hinted at by the occasional shots of soldiers in Hazmat suits?

Then there's that brief shot of Americans tinkering around with what we're guessing is a nuclear warhead. Does an attempt to bomb Godzilla fail abysmally, as it always has in the past?

Such speculation aside, there's one thing we can say for definite about the Godzilla trailer: it shows off a distinctive and thoroughly confident visual style. Before Godzilla, Gareth Edwards' first movie was Monsters, a romance and road-trip drama which happened to have giant monsters as its backdrop. It was a stunning-looking movie made for very little money, and in the Godzilla trailer, we're given a look at what the same director can achieve with Hollywood-level production values.

This doesn't appear to be a disaster movie in the usual glossy blockbuster mode. Look at the way splashes of crimson ring out against black skies and intense shadows, and appear repeatedly throughout, from the red of the seats in a crumbling train carriage to claret-coloured light enveloping Juliette Binoche's face. Admittedly, these are only brief glimpses of a two-hour plus movie, but they hint at an artistic intelligence at work rather than something thrown together by filmmakers without a clue.

Godzilla is glimpsed only a couple of times, with his distinctive scaled back picked out by flashes of lightning at the one minute mark, and a silhouette of his howling profile bringing the trailer to a close. That final shot, along with one memorable aerial scene of a flattened train in the desert, appear to have been taken from the two-year-old Comic-Con trailer mentioned earlier, which could mean they'll appear in the finished movie, too.

This coy introduction of Godzilla, with the trailer showing his power to inspire shock and awe rather than lingering on the beast himself, shows the kind of confidence we're hoping to see in the rest of its marketing. It's refreshing to see a trailer which doesn't rely on the usual aural assault to keep viewers interested; look, for example at the mid-point. It's here, as we see Bryan Cranston (we think) run down a corridor, that the usual "Braahhm" sound effects should kick in - but instead, there's silence.

It's a trailer heavy on atmosphere and light on spoiler-filled details. And most importantly, it introduces a new iteration of Godzilla that Ishiro Honda himself would surely be impressed by. The 1954 movie tapped into the psyche of a nation left reeling by the power of the atom bomb, but it also dwelt on a much older, more universal fear.

In ancient Japan, it was said that a giant sleeping catfish called Namazu created earthquakes with the flick of its tail. The ancient Greeks blamed Poseidon, while the Romans pinned the blame on Vulcanus. Godzilla is in the tradition of those folk tales and old gods, and it's this sense of the mythical that the teaser trailer gets across so well. This is Godzilla as a terrifying force of nature.

Godzilla is out on the 16th May 2014.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Screenwriter hired for Bad Boys 3

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew12/11/2013 at 8:47AM

Michael Bay's apparently not involved yet, but writing work is set to begin on Bad Boys 3...

Rumors of a third Bad Boys movie have been circulating for some time, and producer Jerry Bruckheimer told us earlier this year that the hold-up was that "we're trying to get that off the ground, and trying to find a hole in Will Smith's schedule. That's been the issue". He also confirmed that he was trying to get Michael Bay back to direct the next movie.

Bay has his hands full with Transformers: Age Of Extinction through until next summer, but after that, his schedule might just free up a little. However, there are hints now that Bad Bays 3 will move forward with or without him.

It's being reported that David Guggenheim, the screenwriter who penned films such as Safe House and Stolen, has now been hired to put together a screenplay for Bad Boys 3. But whilst Jerry Bruckheimer is very much involved, at this stage Michael Bay is believed not to be. That could change at any time of course, and we'd assume that given he directed the first two films in the series, he at least gets first refusal on the third.

The plan is to reunite Will Smith and Martin Lawrence, and we suspect there might just be further movement on Bad Boys 3 in 2014.

Source.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


Fast and the Furious: The Ideal Franchise

$
0
0
FeatureGabe Toro12/11/2013 at 8:50AM

With Fast & Furious 6 on Blu-ray this week, we take a moment to reflect on why the Fast and the Furious franchise has become the most perfect of movie series for the 21st century.

***This feature is in tribute and celebration of Fast & Furious, one of the most unique and entertaining of modern movie franchises. However, if interested, we would like to please suggest visiting the website for Paul Walker’s non-profit charity for first-responders, Reach Out Worldwide, and consider making a donation. Thank you.
 
Hollywood has been making sequels for ages, and they will continue this practice until we are old, withered and forgotten in our caskets. Complaining about unoriginality in movies is probably something they were doing in the fifties, eighties, and up until today, because like any business, if the public likes something, you give them more of it. Putting a “part two” behind something is like a warm acknowledgement, a wink from the bartender behind the counter. We know what you like. The usual? Coming right up, sir.
 
Franchises are different. Most of the time, the studios have no idea how they succeeded the first time around. It can be like a man trying to purposefully re-create an accidental pratfall. Never mind doing it again: Can it be done a fourth time? For decades, Hollywood was content to use sequels as either a repetition of what came before, or an honest attempt to do something vastly different and slap a familiar sticker on the can. A series was merely a collection of “part twos,” with little-to-no connecting tissue. Does it really matter in what order you watch Peter Sellers’ original The Pink Panther offerings? Is any non-fanboy actually arguing if this has been the same James Bond over the years? This approach created a disreputable association with the term “sequel”: If we were continuing the story, then the story specifics didn’t really matter, and each installment would require a new set of questions to be asked and answered before the final reel. No one was ever really chomping at the bit for a part five of anything.
 
Obviously, the act of franchising has changed all that, despite the irony that most of Hollywood’s franchises stem from finite source material. Comic book movies rule the industry, but most of those are derived from fifty or more years of printed stories. Others, like Harry Potter and Twilight have outlived the source material, leaving studios scrambling for more—enter WB plotting a Potter spinoff for a 2016 release, while producers have openly discussed re-starting the complete Twilight Saga from the beginning. These franchises work because there’s already a template set up for future films. Everyone else in the business, operating from original tentpole material, is simply flying blind.


 
This must make the Fast and the Furious the ideal, even perfect, franchise for the modern day. Universal is currently at work on the seventh in this massively successful series, and the last few have turned the ongoing story into a supernova of popularity. It doesn’t have a best-selling novel as inspiration, but rather an unlikely source that inspired 2001’s modest The Fast and the Furious: Ken Li’s article Racer X, exposing the world of underground racing gangs. Universal clearly thought they had a dark, edgy crime film on their hands, as one of the names on the screenplay is actually Training Day and End Of Watch writer David Ayer. The core story eventually found these gangs attempting to heist illegal stereo equipment, turning the endeavor into something a little more youth-oriented. Like the car-centric films that Hollywood had been making for decades now, The Fast and the Furious was a basic attempt to latch onto faddish youth culture.
 
Universal had modestly high hopes for the film, which carried a price tag of $38 million, and two stars that were familiar, though hardly household names. Paul Walker was another post-millennial attempt by studios to create a James Dean or Paul Newman, though only his looks, and not his charisma, were tested by a number of teen-appeal films. His task in the original film was tougher than it looked, however: as undercover FBI agent Brian O’Connor, he had to convey to the audience that he was in control, but green enough to seem in over his head. Matched up against the snub-nosed Vin Diesel, it was a dream pairing, beauty and the beast, golden surfer Walker and the brutish, robotic Diesel together behind the wheel. It’s this combination that makes the film seem precisely like a grift from Kathryn Bigelow’s high octane Point Break. And while Diesel’s seat-shaking growl bore no resemblance to that film’s swagger-licious Patrick Swayze, you didn’t have to squint to find similarities in the deliveries of Walker and Keanu Reeves.
 
The film was meant to be a one-off, summer counter-programming that could respectably finish below both expected hit Dr. Dolittle 2, as well as the second weekend of the popular Lara Croft: Tomb Raider. Instead, the picture creamed both those films, and it’s easy to see why. While considerably lighter on action than later entries in the series, Rob Cohen’s boys-will-be-boys thriller finds the common ground between double agent action picture and soapy macho drama. Poor Jordana Brewster isn’t in the film to be a love interest, merely a prop to wedge between O’Connor and Diesel’s Dominic Toretto. It was Diesel’s considerable size that added a paternal edge to their bickering, if not a big brother-little brother angle. Cohen, known for dumb, repetitive would-be blockbusters, wisely understood that all he needed to do was trust Diesel and Walker, the former with audience-commanding force and charisma, the latter as a laidback audience identifier.


 
Like any accidental franchise, this series almost died right as it was about to take off: Diesel had gambled that he was now a star, and he would not return for a sequel unless he was paid top dollar. It’s not a surprise to see him stick with familiarity, re-teaming with Cohen on the vanity project xXx and leaving Dominic Toretto in the dust. After all, Cohen knew how to make Diesel seem sexy and desirable. At this time, The Fast and the Furious only had the offer of a few more dollars, and the chance to be behind the wheel again. Mr. Walker had no such reservations, however, and Brian O’Connor would return for 2 Fast 2 Furious.
 
Arguably the weakest in the series, this film reflects the shortcomings of sequel thinking. O’Connor has returned, but the studio insisted on making a two-hander in an attempt to clone the chemistry between Walker and Diesel. Instead of authoritative Diesel, Walker was matched with Tyrese Gibson’s Roman, a lighthearted old childhood buddy that effectively turned O’Connor into the big brother. It wasn’t a neat fit, and their bickering and jokes seem to suggest a less-than-compelling backstory that’s hinted towards as if it was some sort of storytelling Rosetta Stone. It doesn’t help that Gibson is an intolerable screen presence, wisecracking and roughhousing with Walker as if he were a toddler.
 
What 2 Fast 2 Furious does do, however, is cement the world that these characters inhabit. The first film was grittier and more down-to-earth, but the glitzier follow-up, from Boyz N The Hood director John Singleton, is all about the cars and the races. Going bigger is usually a mandatory step for dumber sequels, but here it expands an already-established milieu, turning a subculture into an entirely different world. Law enforcement lingered in the margins of the first film, but here it’s practically nonexistent, the better to showcase increasingly absurd races, many presided over by Tej (Ludacris). Now that we know who O’Connor is, we can indulge in the stakes with greater abandon.


 
Of course, 2 Fast 2 Furious is not a good sequel in and of itself, and there was the sense that audiences were aware of this. The picture cost considerably more than the first film and ultimately grossed less, giving Universal the perception that they had squeezed everything they possibly could out of this lemon. Walker would just end up becoming more expensive, as Diesel had, and they’d have to keep facing diminished returns from films by directors as indifferent as Singleton, who himself was merely making a pit-stop on his road to big studio mediocrity. At the time, Universal was grooming their direct-to-DVD market to thrive, spotlighting sequels to several of their bigger budgeted franchises – eventually they would reap massive profits from a series of DVD-only American Pie sequels that successfully convinced them to return to the big screen for American Reunion. Given the cheap-ish nature of films about car racing, they saw The Fast and the Furious as a viable brand for this experiment.
 
Fortunately, they changed their mind and opted for a theatrical release, taking their chance on an unproven director named Justin Lin. Cohen was an old studio hand on the first film, and Singleton a struggling artist who couldn’t find his way in the industry after lower budgeted success. But Lin was hungry; he hustled to make his first film, the Asian-American drama Better Luck Tomorrow, before helming the naval drama Annapolis and the mini-budget Bruce Lee satire Finishing The Game. Lin had a background in multiple genres already, and his lack of breakout success meant that he would be the most affordable choice to take the keys. The result was The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift.
 
It’s important for a film series to throw a curveball in the audience’s direction. The small, starless Tokyo Drift might be the series’ lightest, most enjoyable effort, focusing on a young American named Sean Boswell (Lucas Black) who gets wrapped up in the underground racing world of Japan, where he, and the audience, learns about “drifting.” This method of drifting differed from the open-road speed-based competition of the earlier films, necessitating a higher emphasis on swift twists and turns around tight corners. If the earlier films were like bump’n’grind, this was like ballet. The climactic chase alone feels neither fast nor furious, but rather like it’s occurring on another plane of reality, as if Lin were directing from on top of a cloud.


 
Without any real franchise commitments to honor, Lin was free to put his own personal stamp on the material. Amongst the cast is a smooth-talking player named Han, played by Sung Kang. Kang’s Han is a carryover from Better Luck Tomorrow, the sort of sly suggestion for Fast and Furious superfans to latch onto. One can’t build a franchise anymore without those sorts of winks, wrinkles enjoyed by maybe two or three percent of the audience. Furthermore, Lin’s film gets a last-minute visit from one Dominic Toretto, loosely tying it into the universe of the previous two films. While Diesel only logs about a minute of screentime in the film, there was the sense that this was the actor acknowledging he didn’t have much going on in his career after a number of flops, including xXx. Tokyo Drift would go on to make half of what 2 Fast 2 Furious collected, but considering this was a much lower budgeted entry with no names, it kept life in the series.
 
At that point, Universal could have reasonably cut ties and opted to shift the series to an anthology, transitioning to DVD or even TV to capture the stories of the world’s various street racing scenes. But that also ignored the strong life of the first film on television and home formats, constantly replayed, quoted and enjoyed by an entire generation. Eight years later, that film remained a phenomenon, and the studio saw the chance to recapture past glories. But this wasn’t just a reunion for Walker and Diesel, who had not become A-List stars quite yet. It was a shift in genre: There was racing in Fast and Furious, but it felt isolated from the rest of the story, like a mandatory inclusion to please some fans. This was now a series about action, about chases, fisticuffs, gunplay. Re-teaming O’Connor and Toretto wasn’t just a simple reunion: Where originally Toretto held a vague distrust of this newcomer, now he knew that he was a federal agent, and their alliance was an uneasy and unhappy one, ultimately. The late Walker, never the most convincing actor, has to give a real performance as an agent ambivalent about the requirements of his job, and the surrogate family he clearly betrayed. His surprisingly palpable apathy laced with regret makes the fourth film that best honors Walker’s legacy and proof of the star’s basic charisma.
 
The story in Fast and Furious, so named for both its familiarity and subtle grammatical immediacy, is ultimately minor, a mess of drug trafficking and Mexican border drama. John Ortiz’s Braga is probably the best and most clearly-defined villain of all the films thus far, however, and the heroes’ basic motivation is simple: Revenge for the death of Letty (Michelle Rodriguez), Toretto’s girlfriend. The picture itself feels like a steroidal return to the elements in place from the first movie, and under Lin, the direction is crisp and exciting. An early foot chase where O’Connor pursues a perp was the best action sequence at that point in the series. Lin even gets Han in on the action, despite the character’s death in the third film—a line of dialogue implies the film occurs before the events of Tokyo Drift, an audacious nugget that transfixed fans. How does Toretto find himself in Tokyo? Why is O’Connor not in Tokyo? The earlier films were coming from somewhere. Fast and Furious was going somewhere.


 
Perhaps learning humility, perhaps having too good a time, and perhaps realizing that the rest of their careers were a non-event, Walker and Diesel gladly returned for Fast Five. The novelty of this fifth entry, however, wasn’t that it was returning the successful parts of the first film, but that it was rejoining the elements from all the films thus far. Lin was back in the director’s chair, and so was Sung Kang’s Han. Matt Schultze’s shady Vince returned from the first film, Tyrese’s Roman and Ludacris’ Tej from part two, Tego (Tego Calderon), Santos (Don Omar) and Gisele (Gal Gadot) from part four. Fan service is one thing, like when a Joker card is revealed at the end of Batman Begins. But fan reward is rare, and rejoining the stronger elements of all these films felt like a “thanks” from the creators to the fans who had followed every film. And once again, someone suggests to Han that he should go to Tokyo, another sly acknowledgement of the third film.
 
Fast Five cemented the group as a gang and as a family, with Toretto in charge. No longer were they street racing: Now they were Robin Hoods, stealing from the rich to live comfortably off the grid. Fast Five still finds Diesel and Walker in front, but it feels like more of an ensemble, foregrounding one of the key elements of this franchise’s appeal. Unlike other film series’, this one had cross-racial appeal. Walker and Schultze were the lone white guys in the gang, while Diesel’s Toretto always carried an undetermined ethnicity. Tyrese and Ludacris were black Americans, while Calderon and Omar would always be chattering to each other in Spanish, and the shapely Gadot had Israeli lineage, and Kang’s Han Seoul-Oh was Korean. With studios uncertain about greenlighting blockbusters with minority leads, these films had proudly waved their multicultural heritage.
 
Lin and company also knew that simply re-assembling old parts would grow tiresome to the audience, so additional ingredients were necessary, in this case adding, for the first time, a formidable antagonist to the franchise. The mammoth Dwayne Johnson is Agent Hobbs, a car-freak right on their tails and posing, for the first time, a serious physical threat to Diesel and company. Johnson’s the biggest star this series has seen thus far, literally and figuratively, and Lin showcases a sly wit in a foot chase when the hulking Diesel turns around to see what massive behemoth is actually chasing them. Hobbs and Toretto end up having a common enemy, but that doesn’t stop the film from realizing that a Diesel versus Johnson fistfight is the sort of thing even non-Fast and Furious fans waited to see. Playing to the fans was fine, but Johnson’s addition ensured that this series was also trying to recruit those that hadn’t yet sampled the series, a gesture towards new fans that these films offered fresh spectacle beyond burning rubber.


 
Fast Five also wisely borrowed from other blockbusters, specifically superhero films, to keep interest alive. A post-credits sequence, establishing that Hobbs works with Eva Mendes’ Agent Fuentes from 2 Fast 2 Furious, guarantees one more final original part: Letty lives. Dominic’s old girlfriend would end up being enough of a draw for Fast & Furious 6, with the series at this point relying on the strength of the core group (Tego and Santos are conspicuously absent, however). Hobbs ends up recruiting Toretto’s crew in a heist movie set-up: Letty is assisting an automotive terrorist named Owen Shaw (Luke Evans), who bla bla bla superweapon bla bla bla free world: It’s all generic blockbuster stuff, an excuse to have Dominic and Letty banter with each other about what used to be.
 
It’s also an excuse for big screen action: Fast & Furious 6 has by far the best and most expensive action sequences of the series, with Lin juggling multiple vehicles in several moments of controlled chaos. The series also manages to spotlight battles outside of the car as well: Fans don’t know much about Gina Carano or Joe Taslim, but Lin doesn’t need to do much of anything aside from film them to make them seem like stars. You want to add new blood, but you want to surprise audiences as well, so that when Taslim lingers in the background like just another henchman, you don’t expect him to eventually dominate both Tyrese’s Roman and Kang’s Han in combat.
 
By part six, a franchise needs to have a bit of confidence, and Fast & Furious 6 shows this by laying on the continuity heavily. The film’s close is meant to mirror a moment in The Fast and the Furious, with Dominic and Letty reunited, and Brian and Dominic’s sister Mia (Jordana Brewster) nursing a child. The ending also establishes that Han is finally on his way to Tokyo, with a post-credits sequence replaying, without context, his death from The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift. But this time, we see who caused the crash: Owen Shaw’s brother, Ian Shaw. To be in the theater when Jason Statham climbed out of the car to reveal himself as Ian is to hear the sound of the sort of celebration reserved for the knockout punch in a prizefight. Johnson, a formidable presence in his two films in the series, was scary and threatening, but the baggage he brought with him was having featured in a number of kids’ films and generally being everyone’s favorite gentle giant. Statham, who has almost primarily fronted R-rated action films where his heroes freely snap the necks off their enemies, is a whole other ballgame.


 
The seventh film was recently shooting for a summer ’14 release, though there has been a death in the family: Paul Walker passed on, the fatal result of an off-set car crash. Filming has been postponed indefinitely as the cast, crew and studio mourns. There’s reason to believe the movie will start back up again, and it’s an awful loss to everyone involved. It’s likely the series will re-invent itself once again to cope with the loss of Walker’s O’Connor.
 
At the same time, Fast & Furious 6 was the biggest film in the franchise, and the fan outpouring for the loss of Walker suggests this series could endure and grow even more. These films have made a tradition out of repairing and re-adjusting what happened in the last film, and it’s sad to see that it now involves the presence of Mr. Walker. Were it not for him, this franchise would not have a foundation from which to change and evolve. Because of his contributions, this series is essentially the ideal franchise. Because of his contributions, it’s likely to continue that way. Fast & Furious 6 drops on Blu-ray this week and will likely make a clean getaway, because Walker and the rest of the franchise’s parts were finely tuned in crafting the perfect and most rare of blockbusters in the modern era: A customized original.
 
***Thanks for reading. And again, if you are interested in donating to the non-profit charity founded by Paul Walker, please visit the Reach Out Worldwide website.

Disqus - noscript

Enjoyed your analysis of the franchise. I still haven't seen the 6th one but plan to soon.

Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>