New Viral Pictures From Edge of Tomorrow
Production Title For Terminator Reboot Revealed
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Releasing in IMAX 3D
Ridley Scott Options YA Series Fae for Adaptation
Watch This Mysterious Godzilla Movie Teaser!
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
New American Hustle Clip with Bradley Cooper and Amy Adams
Watch the Trailer for Jupiter Ascending
Here's the official plot synopsis, as well: "Jupiter Jones (Mila Kunis) was born under a night sky, with signs predicting that she was destined for great things. Now grown, Jupiter dreams of the stars but wakes up to the cold reality of a job cleaning toilets and an endless run of bad breaks. Only when Caine (Channing Tatum), a genetically engineered ex-military hunter, arrives on Earth to track her down does Jupiter begin to glimpse the fate that has been waiting for her all along – her genetic signature marks her as next in line for an extraordinary inheritance that could alter the balance of the cosmos."
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Disqus - noscript
This is why no movie will ever reach the perfection of Blade Runner. Vfx in movies are now hitting another type of "uncanny valley"; making something look real does not equal to a good movie!
It all begins with a good script.
same thing happened with video games
What was that? It gave a lot of video clips in random order, yet no storyline or a reason to exist.
Jason Momoa signing up for Batman Vs Superman
The cast of Zack Snyder's upcoming Batman Vs Superman movie looks like it's got another body on board, as it's being reported that Jason Momoa is now in talks about joining the movie.
Momoa, whose highest profile roles thus far have seen him headline the Conan remake, and also appear in Game Of Thrones, is apparently set to play either Doomsday or the Martian Manhunter in the movie. The exact role remains guarded, but those are the two possibles that are being widely mooted.
Momoa joins a cast that also includes Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Gal Gadot, Amy Adams and Laurence Fishburne. The movie itself is released on July 17th 2015.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Disqus - noscript
I could see him for either one of those roles.
Whaaat? This project is spinning out of control. First it was Man of Steel 2, a week after MOS's opening week. Then it was Superman vs Batman. Then it was Superman vs Batman and oh, Wonder Woman Too. Now ANOTHER CHARACTER!? Just announce a Justice League movie already. By the time JL finally gets announced, there is going to be no glamour or excitement for the movie, because MOS2 was basically Justice league.
The word from the guy who runs batman on film & who is very close with WB(and who will NEVER give us ANY spoiler info) is that he knows who the villains are & that Momoa will be playing a Superman canon villain--so that rules out MM, but does leave roles like Mongol & Doomsday(hopefully not) as possibilities--Im sure there are more that Im not thinking of that he might play, but when I think big & fierce those 2 come to mind & I think its too early to introduce Darkseid as a major villain--Im guessing he will be "saved" for the JL movie unless this turns into one
Yeah there's either gonna be a crap ton of cameos, or we're basically looking at JLA. Or a reaaaaaaaally long post-credits scene. ;)
I can't see him as anything really... Maybe Lobo?
Tom Cruise to return for Jack Reacher sequel
Last year's Jack Reacher movie was worth it in our book for one of the most brilliantly bizarre villain performances of recent times. We're talking about Werner Herzog's brief but impactful turn in the movie. That, and the excellent opening sequence, remain highlights of the movie.
Jack Reacher didn't do badly at the box office either, pulling in a worldwide gross of $218m. That might not sound a lot in the days of Marvel movies routinely breezing past $500m, but Jack Reacher cost an economical $57m to make. And whilst Tom Cruise's performance in the title role didn't win over every fan of Lee Childs' books, the project remains something of a success.
Christopher McQuarrie directed Jack Reacher, and he's now reuniting with Tom Cruise on Mission: Impossible 5. But once that's done, it looks like it's full speed ahead on Jack Reacher 2.
The plan is to adapt the book Never Go Back as the basis of the next movie, which is the latest novel in the long-running series. The plan, if he wants it, is to give McQuarrie the directing gig again, although he's not going to have time to write the screenplay this time.
When we hear more about who is on screenplay duties, we'll let you know....
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Watch the First Trailer For Godzilla Right Here!
Godzilla stars future Avengers stars Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Elizabeth Olsen and Breaking Bad anti-hero Breaking Bad. It will demolish the box office starting on May 16, 2014. Oh, and check out this poster, too!
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Andrew Garfield May Not Return for a Fourth Spidey
First TV Spot for The Legend of Hercules
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes Moved Up a Week
Saving Mr. Banks Archival iBook Now Available
Tron Writer Jesse Wigutow Adapting Brian Michael Bendis’ Fire
Director found for World War Z 2
There's a sporting chance that the sequel to this year's World War Z movie is going to be moving ahead sooner rather than later, with the news now that a director has already been found for the project. It was little secret by the end of the first shoot that star and producer Brad Pitt wasn't seeing eye to eye with World War Z director Marc Forster, and thus it's been known for a while that the latter wouldn't be back for the next movie.
The job instead has gone to Juan Antonio Bayona. He's most recently directed The Impossible, and before that he made The Orphanage. He's been brought onto World War Z 2 relatively early, as he's also going to be overseeing the writing process for the movie. As it stands, no writers are known to have been recruited, so it may be a while yet before we see the movie.
We suspect 2016 will be the earliest we might see the movie, but as always, we'll keep you posted as we find out more...
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
How Natural Born Killers changed product placement
In Jane Hamsher's excellent book, Killer Instinct, the producer charts the difficult path she and Don Murphy had in bringing Natural Born Killers to the big screen. Natural Born Killers was, of course, originally a Quentin Tarantino screenplay, one that changed dramatically when Oliver Stone signed up to direct the movie.
Tarantino sold the rights to the movie for $10,000 after he'd tried to set the project up himself - this was before the Oscar-winning success of Pulp Fiction - and would regret the decision. That said, rumours that he held animosity towards Oliver Stone himself were just that. In interviews since, Tarantino has always been respectful towards him.
Back to Killer Instinct, though. There are a couple of passages in the book which relate to the way product placement was used in the movie. Firstly, Hamsher reports how one particular shot was required in exchange for free pairs of cowboy shoes for some of those making the movie. The trade off was that the brand name of said shoes was on the side of a truck that needed to be included. Stone included the shot.
But the part of the movie that was going to have further ramifications for how product placement was approached in the movies was mainly around the sitcom segment, I Love Mallory. This is where Juliette Lewis' character in the movie appears alongside Rodney Dangerfield. It's a divisive scene (Tarantino describes it as the moment he turned the movie off), where Stone shifts the tone of the movie, but not the content. As such, by putting a sitcom laughing track behind the exploration of Mallory's hugely unpleasant father, Stone makes uneasy switch about what we laugh at in a sanitised entertainment context, using incredibly dark humor to do so.
You might not like the scene, but it's an interesting approach. And then, pretty much straight after it, there's an ad for Coca-Cola. If you were one of the many who sat there at the time of watching the movie wondering why on earth The Coca-Cola Company agreed to that, then you were not alone. Certain executives at The Coca-Cola Company more than shared your view. The famous Coca-Cola polar bear ad was used on more than one occasion throughout the movie, mainly when Stone was making switch about violence,
So how did it happen? It's a simple question, with a simple answer: the Natural Born Killers team asked, The Coca-Cola Company said yes. What The Coca-Cola Company didn't do, crucially, was watch the movie in time, or apparently insist that they saw it before it was released.
As the Associated Press reported back in August 1994, "Coca-Cola thought that the spot was to be used in a scene in which Tommy Lee Jones watched the Super Bowl on television. Instead, the commercial is interspersed with images such as a headless, bloody body. The spots were used three times in the movie, intercut with brutal images of mayhem".
A statement issued from The Coca-Cola Company back in 1994, with no penchant for understatement, went on to say that "we're concerned that our commercial is being used in a way we didn't intend and weren't aware of".
It would be the last time that Coca-Cola took such a relaxed view to product placement in movies and television. Before then, it had been used to positive appearances in the likes of Jaws, Superman and Superman II. Its agreement with the producers of Natural Born Killers was based on similar thinking, clearly. Said agreement appears so watertight that it can't now get its commercial removed from further releases of the movie.
Oliver Stone himself admits on the commentary track for the movie that The Coca-Cola Company board of directors was "furious" when it saw the finished movie, and how its branding had been used to punctuate key moments of the movie. This clearly wasn't the vision that the firm had when it got involved with movies. At one stage after all, The Coca-Cola Company owned Columbia Pictures, eventually selling the movie business to Sony in 1989. It does make it all just a little more surprising. After all, this wasn't a company with no experience of films and how they worked.
And yet Natural Born Killers was testament to the way product placement was seen back in the early 1990s. The Coca-Cola Company formalised its processes in the aftermath of Natural Born Killers, and many big brands heeded the same lesson. Processes were put in place, and companies suddenly became a lot more guarded about how their brands were used in the movies.
Arguably as a consequence of this, the product placement business mushroomed. Because both studios and brands worked out how this could be mutually beneficial, if put on a more formal footing. It wasn't as if money hadn't changed hands before in exchange for brand names appearing in films - although a lot of product placement back then was actually free of charge - but the proverbial goalposts most certainly shifted. Product placement became more controlled and sought after, from both sides of the fence.
In 2000 for instance, just six years later, The Coca-Cola Company actively sponsored a Warner Bros TV show by the name of Young Americans. The show didn't last, but the sign that things had changed came when a scene in it was reshot because a Pepsi machine was in the background at one stage. The Coca-Cola Company had gone from a business that had blindly signed off the use of one of its iconic commercials, to one that was examining the deployment of its branding in minute detail.
Should all of this change be laid at the door of Natural Born Killers? No, of course not. But it's hard not to see Oliver Stone's movie as a catalyst for change. The sheer exposure the Coca-Cola ads got from their positioning in that movie was an eye-opener, and it led to brands being far, far more controlling of their message. For a long time, trust was out of the window.
Consequently, studios were alive to the impact such product placements would have, and it's now a given that product placement can take the edge off the price of a particularly high blockbuster movie budget. Just check out Man Of Steel: Warner Bros lured in Budweiser, iHop, CNN, Sears, Nokia and many more. According to reports, such 'commercial partnerships' (that's the current terminology) brought in over $160m. In all, over 100 contracts with 'global marketing partners' were signed for Man Of Steel, and product placement made up a solid amount of those.
It's certainly a lot different from 1994. And while the collision of Natural Born Killers and The Coca-Cola Company had been coming, that it was those two that collided - on such a controversial movie anyway - was the key variable. Yet so laid back was product placement in movie theater, even in the early 1990s, that something was soon going to give. It did, and the ramifications do continue to be felt. It's telling that no company has been caught out the same way again.
For The Coca-Cola Company at least though, the reminder of the cost of not properly checking how product placement is being deployed remains present every time a Natural Born Killers disc is sold, or the movie is screened somewhere. It's proven to be a very hard lesson, and one that, in some small way, started a sea change in how movies, televisions and big brand products would work with each other. We suspect, too, that it didn't help sell too many cans of Coke at the time...
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
A closer look at the trailer for Gareth Edwards' Godzilla
Next year marks the 60th birthday of Godzilla, Japan's most famous giant monster. The star of around 30 increasingly outlandish movies, a 1998 US remake, a cartoon series and a mountain of merchandise, it's easy to forget that Gojira (to give him his original Japanese name) wasn't conceived as a familiar figure of fun, but a city-leveling creature to be feared.
Director Gareth Edwards stated some time ago that he intended to reinstate Godzilla's power to inspire a sense of fear and awe in his forthcoming reboot, timed to coincide with the grand Kaiju's birthday next year. And it's clear from the first few seconds of the movie's new trailer that Edwards has already gone some way towards achieving that.
Like the teaser trailer shown off at Comic-Con two years ago, the new promo uses the eerie Monolith theme from Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey as a backwash for its images. This may be because the finished score isn't finished yet, but we're half hoping they use something like it in the final movie - it gives the firey visuals a perfectly apocalyptic tone.
In some ways, the Godzilla trailer's perfectly conventional: we're given a brief introduction to some of the leading players - Aaron Taylor Johnson, Juliette Binoche, Bryan Cranston and Elizabeth Olsen are all glimpsed - an idea of the movie's events, and finally a glimpse of the lumbering beast himself. But what's unusual about the Godzilla trailer is how carefully its shots are chosen, and how little they give away when you really look at them in turn.
The opening sequence, a series of shots depicting the briefing and execution of a military skydive over a city, sets the trailer's ominous tone and introduces Johnson's Lieutenant Ford, here looking apprehensive (as we would) ahead of the leap.
Exactly why Lieutenant Ford and his pal soldiers are leaping from a plane isn't clear. In the 1955 Japanese sequel Godzilla Raids Again, flares are used to lead Godzilla towards the sea. Is something similar going on here, with the red trails left by the soldiers designed to attract the monster, or are they attempting something different?
It's an interesting lead-in to the promo in any case, since most trailers are designed to reflect a finished movie's opening act rather than an event from what we're guessing is its mid-section. The trailer for the 1998 Godzilla, for example, showed off the scarred fishing boats and beached cargo ships which hailed the creatures arrival.
By contrast, Godzilla 2014 gives no obvious clue as to where Godzilla comes from or where he'll first attack. We've heard elsewhere that Godzilla won't be the product of an atomic bomb, as in the 1954 original, but as the result of some other, more contemporary form of ecological catastrophe. Is he the result of a military experiment, as hinted at by the occasional shots of soldiers in Hazmat suits?
Then there's that brief shot of Americans tinkering around with what we're guessing is a nuclear warhead. Does an attempt to bomb Godzilla fail abysmally, as it always has in the past?
Such speculation aside, there's one thing we can say for definite about the Godzilla trailer: it shows off a distinctive and thoroughly confident visual style. Before Godzilla, Gareth Edwards' first movie was Monsters, a romance and road-trip drama which happened to have giant monsters as its backdrop. It was a stunning-looking movie made for very little money, and in the Godzilla trailer, we're given a look at what the same director can achieve with Hollywood-level production values.
This doesn't appear to be a disaster movie in the usual glossy blockbuster mode. Look at the way splashes of crimson ring out against black skies and intense shadows, and appear repeatedly throughout, from the red of the seats in a crumbling train carriage to claret-coloured light enveloping Juliette Binoche's face. Admittedly, these are only brief glimpses of a two-hour plus movie, but they hint at an artistic intelligence at work rather than something thrown together by filmmakers without a clue.
Godzilla is glimpsed only a couple of times, with his distinctive scaled back picked out by flashes of lightning at the one minute mark, and a silhouette of his howling profile bringing the trailer to a close. That final shot, along with one memorable aerial scene of a flattened train in the desert, appear to have been taken from the two-year-old Comic-Con trailer mentioned earlier, which could mean they'll appear in the finished movie, too.
This coy introduction of Godzilla, with the trailer showing his power to inspire shock and awe rather than lingering on the beast himself, shows the kind of confidence we're hoping to see in the rest of its marketing. It's refreshing to see a trailer which doesn't rely on the usual aural assault to keep viewers interested; look, for example at the mid-point. It's here, as we see Bryan Cranston (we think) run down a corridor, that the usual "Braahhm" sound effects should kick in - but instead, there's silence.
It's a trailer heavy on atmosphere and light on spoiler-filled details. And most importantly, it introduces a new iteration of Godzilla that Ishiro Honda himself would surely be impressed by. The 1954 movie tapped into the psyche of a nation left reeling by the power of the atom bomb, but it also dwelt on a much older, more universal fear.
In ancient Japan, it was said that a giant sleeping catfish called Namazu created earthquakes with the flick of its tail. The ancient Greeks blamed Poseidon, while the Romans pinned the blame on Vulcanus. Godzilla is in the tradition of those folk tales and old gods, and it's this sense of the mythical that the teaser trailer gets across so well. This is Godzilla as a terrifying force of nature.
Godzilla is out on the 16th May 2014.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Screenwriter hired for Bad Boys 3
Rumors of a third Bad Boys movie have been circulating for some time, and producer Jerry Bruckheimer told us earlier this year that the hold-up was that "we're trying to get that off the ground, and trying to find a hole in Will Smith's schedule. That's been the issue". He also confirmed that he was trying to get Michael Bay back to direct the next movie.
Bay has his hands full with Transformers: Age Of Extinction through until next summer, but after that, his schedule might just free up a little. However, there are hints now that Bad Bays 3 will move forward with or without him.
It's being reported that David Guggenheim, the screenwriter who penned films such as Safe House and Stolen, has now been hired to put together a screenplay for Bad Boys 3. But whilst Jerry Bruckheimer is very much involved, at this stage Michael Bay is believed not to be. That could change at any time of course, and we'd assume that given he directed the first two films in the series, he at least gets first refusal on the third.
The plan is to reunite Will Smith and Martin Lawrence, and we suspect there might just be further movement on Bad Boys 3 in 2014.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Disqus - noscript
Why would they want another reboot TV show of the series? They had an awesome one a few years ago, with ANOTHER Game of Thrones person (Lena Heady) playing Sara Connor, which was a GREAT show until Fox canclled it after 2 seasons. If anything bring that show back!
I thought the show was a bore.
They need to stop rebooting TV shows and movies of a once successful franchise.