Quantcast
Channel: Movies – Den of Geek
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live

How Natural Born Killers changed product placement

$
0
0
FeatureSimon Brew12/11/2013 at 8:44AM

Not all publicity is good publicity, as Coca Cola found out in Natural Born Killers, a film that changed the way brands worked with movies

In Jane Hamsher's excellent book, Killer Instinct, the producer charts the difficult path she and Don Murphy had in bringing Natural Born Killers to the big screen. Natural Born Killers was, of course, originally a Quentin Tarantino screenplay, one that changed dramatically when Oliver Stone signed up to direct the movie.

Tarantino sold the rights to the movie for $10,000 after he'd tried to set the project up himself - this was before the Oscar-winning success of Pulp Fiction - and would regret the decision. That said, rumours that he held animosity towards Oliver Stone himself were just that. In interviews since, Tarantino has always been respectful towards him.

Back to Killer Instinct, though. There are a couple of passages in the book which relate to the way product placement was used in the movie. Firstly, Hamsher reports how one particular shot was required in exchange for free pairs of cowboy shoes for some of those making the movie. The trade off was that the brand name of said shoes was on the side of a truck that needed to be included. Stone included the shot.

But the part of the movie that was going to have further ramifications for how product placement was approached in the movies was mainly around the sitcom segment, I Love Mallory. This is where Juliette Lewis' character in the movie appears alongside Rodney Dangerfield. It's a divisive scene (Tarantino describes it as the moment he turned the movie off), where Stone shifts the tone of the movie, but not the content. As such, by putting a sitcom laughing track behind the exploration of Mallory's hugely unpleasant father, Stone makes uneasy switch about what we laugh at in a sanitised entertainment context, using incredibly dark humor to do so.

You might not like the scene, but it's an interesting approach. And then, pretty much straight after it, there's an ad for Coca-Cola. If you were one of the many who sat there at the time of watching the movie wondering why on earth The Coca-Cola Company agreed to that, then you were not alone. Certain executives at The Coca-Cola Company more than shared your view. The famous Coca-Cola polar bear ad was used on more than one occasion throughout the movie, mainly when Stone was making switch about violence, 

So how did it happen? It's a simple question, with a simple answer: the Natural Born Killers team asked, The Coca-Cola Company said yes. What The Coca-Cola Company didn't do, crucially, was watch the movie in time, or apparently insist that they saw it before it was released.

As the Associated Press reported back in August 1994, "Coca-Cola thought that the spot was to be used in a scene in which Tommy Lee Jones watched the Super Bowl on television. Instead, the commercial is interspersed with images such as a headless, bloody body. The spots were used three times in the movie, intercut with brutal images of mayhem".

A statement issued from The Coca-Cola Company back in 1994, with no penchant for understatement, went on to say that "we're concerned that our commercial is being used in a way we didn't intend and weren't aware of".

It would be the last time that Coca-Cola took such a relaxed view to product placement in movies and television. Before then, it had been used to positive appearances in the likes of JawsSuperman and Superman II. Its agreement with the producers of Natural Born Killers was based on similar thinking, clearly. Said agreement appears so watertight that it can't now get its commercial removed from further releases of the movie.

Oliver Stone himself admits on the commentary track for the movie that The Coca-Cola Company board of directors was "furious" when it saw the finished movie, and how its branding had been used to punctuate key moments of the movie. This clearly wasn't the vision that the firm had when it got involved with movies. At one stage after all, The Coca-Cola Company owned Columbia Pictures, eventually selling the movie business to Sony in 1989. It does make it all just a little more surprising. After all, this wasn't a company with no experience of films and how they worked.

And yet Natural Born Killers was testament to the way product placement was seen back in the early 1990s. The Coca-Cola Company formalised its processes in the aftermath of Natural Born Killers, and many big brands heeded the same lesson. Processes were put in place, and companies suddenly became a lot more guarded about how their brands were used in the movies.

Arguably as a consequence of this, the product placement business mushroomed. Because both studios and brands worked out how this could be mutually beneficial, if put on a more formal footing. It wasn't as if money hadn't changed hands before in exchange for brand names appearing in films - although a lot of product placement back then was actually free of charge - but the proverbial goalposts most certainly shifted. Product placement became more controlled and sought after, from both sides of the fence.

In 2000 for instance, just six years later, The Coca-Cola Company actively sponsored a Warner Bros TV show by the name of Young Americans. The show didn't last, but the sign that things had changed came when a scene in it was reshot because a Pepsi machine was in the background at one stage. The Coca-Cola Company had gone from a business that had blindly signed off the use of one of its iconic commercials, to one that was examining the deployment of its branding in minute detail.

Should all of this change be laid at the door of Natural Born Killers? No, of course not. But it's hard not to see Oliver Stone's movie as a catalyst for change. The sheer exposure the Coca-Cola ads got from their positioning in that movie was an eye-opener, and it led to brands being far, far more controlling of their message. For a long time, trust was out of the window.

Consequently, studios were alive to the impact such product placements would have, and it's now a given that product placement can take the edge off the price of a particularly high blockbuster movie budget. Just check out Man Of Steel: Warner Bros lured in Budweiser, iHop, CNN, Sears, Nokia and many more. According to reports, such 'commercial partnerships' (that's the current terminology) brought in over $160m. In all, over 100 contracts with 'global marketing partners' were signed for Man Of Steel, and product placement made up a solid amount of those.

It's certainly a lot different from 1994. And while the collision of Natural Born Killers and The Coca-Cola Company had been coming, that it was those two that collided - on such a controversial movie anyway - was the key variable. Yet so laid back was product placement in movie theater, even in the early 1990s, that something was soon going to give. It did, and the ramifications do continue to be felt. It's telling that no company has been caught out the same way again.

For The Coca-Cola Company at least though, the reminder of the cost of not properly checking how product placement is being deployed remains present every time a Natural Born Killers disc is sold, or the movie is screened somewhere. It's proven to be a very hard lesson, and one that, in some small way, started a sea change in how movies, televisions and big brand products would work with each other. We suspect, too, that it didn't help sell too many cans of Coke at the time...

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

This was a well written and fantastic read.
We marketers salute you!


A closer look at the trailer for Gareth Edwards' Godzilla

$
0
0
FeatureRyan Lambie12/11/2013 at 8:45AM

The first trailer for Gareth Edwards' Godzilla landed yesterday. We take a closer look at its finer details...

Next year marks the 60th birthday of Godzilla, Japan's most famous giant monster. The star of around 30 increasingly outlandish movies, a 1998 US remake, a cartoon series and a mountain of merchandise, it's easy to forget that Gojira (to give him his original Japanese name) wasn't conceived as a familiar figure of fun, but a city-leveling creature to be feared.

Director Gareth Edwards stated some time ago that he intended to reinstate Godzilla's power to inspire a sense of fear and awe in his forthcoming reboot, timed to coincide with the grand Kaiju's birthday next year. And it's clear from the first few seconds of the movie's new trailer that Edwards has already gone some way towards achieving that.

Like the teaser trailer shown off at Comic-Con two years ago, the new promo uses the eerie Monolith theme from Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey as a backwash for its images. This may be because the finished score isn't finished yet, but we're half hoping they use something like it in the final movie - it gives the firey visuals a perfectly apocalyptic tone.

In some ways, the Godzilla trailer's perfectly conventional: we're given a brief introduction to some of the leading players - Aaron Taylor Johnson, Juliette Binoche, Bryan Cranston and Elizabeth Olsen are all glimpsed - an idea of the movie's events, and finally a glimpse of the lumbering beast himself. But what's unusual about the Godzilla trailer is how carefully its shots are chosen, and how little they give away when you really look at them in turn.

The opening sequence, a series of shots depicting the briefing and execution of a military skydive over a city, sets the trailer's ominous tone and introduces Johnson's Lieutenant Ford, here looking apprehensive (as we would) ahead of the leap.

Exactly why Lieutenant Ford and his pal soldiers are leaping from a plane isn't clear. In the 1955 Japanese sequel Godzilla Raids Again, flares are used to lead Godzilla towards the sea. Is something similar going on here, with the red trails left by the soldiers designed to attract the monster, or are they attempting something different?

It's an interesting lead-in to the promo in any case, since most trailers are designed to reflect a finished movie's opening act rather than an event from what we're guessing is its mid-section. The trailer for the 1998 Godzilla, for example, showed off the scarred fishing boats and beached cargo ships which hailed the creatures arrival.

By contrast, Godzilla 2014 gives no obvious clue as to where Godzilla comes from or where he'll first attack. We've heard elsewhere that Godzilla won't be the product of an atomic bomb, as in the 1954 original, but as the result of some other, more contemporary form of ecological catastrophe. Is he the result of a military experiment, as hinted at by the occasional shots of soldiers in Hazmat suits?

Then there's that brief shot of Americans tinkering around with what we're guessing is a nuclear warhead. Does an attempt to bomb Godzilla fail abysmally, as it always has in the past?

Such speculation aside, there's one thing we can say for definite about the Godzilla trailer: it shows off a distinctive and thoroughly confident visual style. Before Godzilla, Gareth Edwards' first movie was Monsters, a romance and road-trip drama which happened to have giant monsters as its backdrop. It was a stunning-looking movie made for very little money, and in the Godzilla trailer, we're given a look at what the same director can achieve with Hollywood-level production values.

This doesn't appear to be a disaster movie in the usual glossy blockbuster mode. Look at the way splashes of crimson ring out against black skies and intense shadows, and appear repeatedly throughout, from the red of the seats in a crumbling train carriage to claret-coloured light enveloping Juliette Binoche's face. Admittedly, these are only brief glimpses of a two-hour plus movie, but they hint at an artistic intelligence at work rather than something thrown together by filmmakers without a clue.

Godzilla is glimpsed only a couple of times, with his distinctive scaled back picked out by flashes of lightning at the one minute mark, and a silhouette of his howling profile bringing the trailer to a close. That final shot, along with one memorable aerial scene of a flattened train in the desert, appear to have been taken from the two-year-old Comic-Con trailer mentioned earlier, which could mean they'll appear in the finished movie, too.

This coy introduction of Godzilla, with the trailer showing his power to inspire shock and awe rather than lingering on the beast himself, shows the kind of confidence we're hoping to see in the rest of its marketing. It's refreshing to see a trailer which doesn't rely on the usual aural assault to keep viewers interested; look, for example at the mid-point. It's here, as we see Bryan Cranston (we think) run down a corridor, that the usual "Braahhm" sound effects should kick in - but instead, there's silence.

It's a trailer heavy on atmosphere and light on spoiler-filled details. And most importantly, it introduces a new iteration of Godzilla that Ishiro Honda himself would surely be impressed by. The 1954 movie tapped into the psyche of a nation left reeling by the power of the atom bomb, but it also dwelt on a much older, more universal fear.

In ancient Japan, it was said that a giant sleeping catfish called Namazu created earthquakes with the flick of its tail. The ancient Greeks blamed Poseidon, while the Romans pinned the blame on Vulcanus. Godzilla is in the tradition of those folk tales and old gods, and it's this sense of the mythical that the teaser trailer gets across so well. This is Godzilla as a terrifying force of nature.

Godzilla is out on the 16th May 2014.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Screenwriter hired for Bad Boys 3

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew12/11/2013 at 8:47AM

Michael Bay's apparently not involved yet, but writing work is set to begin on Bad Boys 3...

Rumors of a third Bad Boys movie have been circulating for some time, and producer Jerry Bruckheimer told us earlier this year that the hold-up was that "we're trying to get that off the ground, and trying to find a hole in Will Smith's schedule. That's been the issue". He also confirmed that he was trying to get Michael Bay back to direct the next movie.

Bay has his hands full with Transformers: Age Of Extinction through until next summer, but after that, his schedule might just free up a little. However, there are hints now that Bad Bays 3 will move forward with or without him.

It's being reported that David Guggenheim, the screenwriter who penned films such as Safe House and Stolen, has now been hired to put together a screenplay for Bad Boys 3. But whilst Jerry Bruckheimer is very much involved, at this stage Michael Bay is believed not to be. That could change at any time of course, and we'd assume that given he directed the first two films in the series, he at least gets first refusal on the third.

The plan is to reunite Will Smith and Martin Lawrence, and we suspect there might just be further movement on Bad Boys 3 in 2014.

Source.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


Fast and the Furious: The Ideal Franchise

$
0
0
FeatureGabe Toro12/11/2013 at 8:50AM

With Fast & Furious 6 on Blu-ray this week, we take a moment to reflect on why the Fast and the Furious franchise has become the most perfect of movie series for the 21st century.

***This feature is in tribute and celebration of Fast & Furious, one of the most unique and entertaining of modern movie franchises. However, if interested, we would like to please suggest visiting the website for Paul Walker’s non-profit charity for first-responders, Reach Out Worldwide, and consider making a donation. Thank you.
 
Hollywood has been making sequels for ages, and they will continue this practice until we are old, withered and forgotten in our caskets. Complaining about unoriginality in movies is probably something they were doing in the fifties, eighties, and up until today, because like any business, if the public likes something, you give them more of it. Putting a “part two” behind something is like a warm acknowledgement, a wink from the bartender behind the counter. We know what you like. The usual? Coming right up, sir.
 
Franchises are different. Most of the time, the studios have no idea how they succeeded the first time around. It can be like a man trying to purposefully re-create an accidental pratfall. Never mind doing it again: Can it be done a fourth time? For decades, Hollywood was content to use sequels as either a repetition of what came before, or an honest attempt to do something vastly different and slap a familiar sticker on the can. A series was merely a collection of “part twos,” with little-to-no connecting tissue. Does it really matter in what order you watch Peter Sellers’ original The Pink Panther offerings? Is any non-fanboy actually arguing if this has been the same James Bond over the years? This approach created a disreputable association with the term “sequel”: If we were continuing the story, then the story specifics didn’t really matter, and each installment would require a new set of questions to be asked and answered before the final reel. No one was ever really chomping at the bit for a part five of anything.
 
Obviously, the act of franchising has changed all that, despite the irony that most of Hollywood’s franchises stem from finite source material. Comic book movies rule the industry, but most of those are derived from fifty or more years of printed stories. Others, like Harry Potter and Twilight have outlived the source material, leaving studios scrambling for more—enter WB plotting a Potter spinoff for a 2016 release, while producers have openly discussed re-starting the complete Twilight Saga from the beginning. These franchises work because there’s already a template set up for future films. Everyone else in the business, operating from original tentpole material, is simply flying blind.


 
This must make the Fast and the Furious the ideal, even perfect, franchise for the modern day. Universal is currently at work on the seventh in this massively successful series, and the last few have turned the ongoing story into a supernova of popularity. It doesn’t have a best-selling novel as inspiration, but rather an unlikely source that inspired 2001’s modest The Fast and the Furious: Ken Li’s article Racer X, exposing the world of underground racing gangs. Universal clearly thought they had a dark, edgy crime film on their hands, as one of the names on the screenplay is actually Training Day and End Of Watch writer David Ayer. The core story eventually found these gangs attempting to heist illegal stereo equipment, turning the endeavor into something a little more youth-oriented. Like the car-centric films that Hollywood had been making for decades now, The Fast and the Furious was a basic attempt to latch onto faddish youth culture.
 
Universal had modestly high hopes for the film, which carried a price tag of $38 million, and two stars that were familiar, though hardly household names. Paul Walker was another post-millennial attempt by studios to create a James Dean or Paul Newman, though only his looks, and not his charisma, were tested by a number of teen-appeal films. His task in the original film was tougher than it looked, however: as undercover FBI agent Brian O’Connor, he had to convey to the audience that he was in control, but green enough to seem in over his head. Matched up against the snub-nosed Vin Diesel, it was a dream pairing, beauty and the beast, golden surfer Walker and the brutish, robotic Diesel together behind the wheel. It’s this combination that makes the film seem precisely like a grift from Kathryn Bigelow’s high octane Point Break. And while Diesel’s seat-shaking growl bore no resemblance to that film’s swagger-licious Patrick Swayze, you didn’t have to squint to find similarities in the deliveries of Walker and Keanu Reeves.
 
The film was meant to be a one-off, summer counter-programming that could respectably finish below both expected hit Dr. Dolittle 2, as well as the second weekend of the popular Lara Croft: Tomb Raider. Instead, the picture creamed both those films, and it’s easy to see why. While considerably lighter on action than later entries in the series, Rob Cohen’s boys-will-be-boys thriller finds the common ground between double agent action picture and soapy macho drama. Poor Jordana Brewster isn’t in the film to be a love interest, merely a prop to wedge between O’Connor and Diesel’s Dominic Toretto. It was Diesel’s considerable size that added a paternal edge to their bickering, if not a big brother-little brother angle. Cohen, known for dumb, repetitive would-be blockbusters, wisely understood that all he needed to do was trust Diesel and Walker, the former with audience-commanding force and charisma, the latter as a laidback audience identifier.


 
Like any accidental franchise, this series almost died right as it was about to take off: Diesel had gambled that he was now a star, and he would not return for a sequel unless he was paid top dollar. It’s not a surprise to see him stick with familiarity, re-teaming with Cohen on the vanity project xXx and leaving Dominic Toretto in the dust. After all, Cohen knew how to make Diesel seem sexy and desirable. At this time, The Fast and the Furious only had the offer of a few more dollars, and the chance to be behind the wheel again. Mr. Walker had no such reservations, however, and Brian O’Connor would return for 2 Fast 2 Furious.
 
Arguably the weakest in the series, this film reflects the shortcomings of sequel thinking. O’Connor has returned, but the studio insisted on making a two-hander in an attempt to clone the chemistry between Walker and Diesel. Instead of authoritative Diesel, Walker was matched with Tyrese Gibson’s Roman, a lighthearted old childhood buddy that effectively turned O’Connor into the big brother. It wasn’t a neat fit, and their bickering and jokes seem to suggest a less-than-compelling backstory that’s hinted towards as if it was some sort of storytelling Rosetta Stone. It doesn’t help that Gibson is an intolerable screen presence, wisecracking and roughhousing with Walker as if he were a toddler.
 
What 2 Fast 2 Furious does do, however, is cement the world that these characters inhabit. The first film was grittier and more down-to-earth, but the glitzier follow-up, from Boyz N The Hood director John Singleton, is all about the cars and the races. Going bigger is usually a mandatory step for dumber sequels, but here it expands an already-established milieu, turning a subculture into an entirely different world. Law enforcement lingered in the margins of the first film, but here it’s practically nonexistent, the better to showcase increasingly absurd races, many presided over by Tej (Ludacris). Now that we know who O’Connor is, we can indulge in the stakes with greater abandon.


 
Of course, 2 Fast 2 Furious is not a good sequel in and of itself, and there was the sense that audiences were aware of this. The picture cost considerably more than the first film and ultimately grossed less, giving Universal the perception that they had squeezed everything they possibly could out of this lemon. Walker would just end up becoming more expensive, as Diesel had, and they’d have to keep facing diminished returns from films by directors as indifferent as Singleton, who himself was merely making a pit-stop on his road to big studio mediocrity. At the time, Universal was grooming their direct-to-DVD market to thrive, spotlighting sequels to several of their bigger budgeted franchises – eventually they would reap massive profits from a series of DVD-only American Pie sequels that successfully convinced them to return to the big screen for American Reunion. Given the cheap-ish nature of films about car racing, they saw The Fast and the Furious as a viable brand for this experiment.
 
Fortunately, they changed their mind and opted for a theatrical release, taking their chance on an unproven director named Justin Lin. Cohen was an old studio hand on the first film, and Singleton a struggling artist who couldn’t find his way in the industry after lower budgeted success. But Lin was hungry; he hustled to make his first film, the Asian-American drama Better Luck Tomorrow, before helming the naval drama Annapolis and the mini-budget Bruce Lee satire Finishing The Game. Lin had a background in multiple genres already, and his lack of breakout success meant that he would be the most affordable choice to take the keys. The result was The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift.
 
It’s important for a film series to throw a curveball in the audience’s direction. The small, starless Tokyo Drift might be the series’ lightest, most enjoyable effort, focusing on a young American named Sean Boswell (Lucas Black) who gets wrapped up in the underground racing world of Japan, where he, and the audience, learns about “drifting.” This method of drifting differed from the open-road speed-based competition of the earlier films, necessitating a higher emphasis on swift twists and turns around tight corners. If the earlier films were like bump’n’grind, this was like ballet. The climactic chase alone feels neither fast nor furious, but rather like it’s occurring on another plane of reality, as if Lin were directing from on top of a cloud.


 
Without any real franchise commitments to honor, Lin was free to put his own personal stamp on the material. Amongst the cast is a smooth-talking player named Han, played by Sung Kang. Kang’s Han is a carryover from Better Luck Tomorrow, the sort of sly suggestion for Fast and Furious superfans to latch onto. One can’t build a franchise anymore without those sorts of winks, wrinkles enjoyed by maybe two or three percent of the audience. Furthermore, Lin’s film gets a last-minute visit from one Dominic Toretto, loosely tying it into the universe of the previous two films. While Diesel only logs about a minute of screentime in the film, there was the sense that this was the actor acknowledging he didn’t have much going on in his career after a number of flops, including xXx. Tokyo Drift would go on to make half of what 2 Fast 2 Furious collected, but considering this was a much lower budgeted entry with no names, it kept life in the series.
 
At that point, Universal could have reasonably cut ties and opted to shift the series to an anthology, transitioning to DVD or even TV to capture the stories of the world’s various street racing scenes. But that also ignored the strong life of the first film on television and home formats, constantly replayed, quoted and enjoyed by an entire generation. Eight years later, that film remained a phenomenon, and the studio saw the chance to recapture past glories. But this wasn’t just a reunion for Walker and Diesel, who had not become A-List stars quite yet. It was a shift in genre: There was racing in Fast and Furious, but it felt isolated from the rest of the story, like a mandatory inclusion to please some fans. This was now a series about action, about chases, fisticuffs, gunplay. Re-teaming O’Connor and Toretto wasn’t just a simple reunion: Where originally Toretto held a vague distrust of this newcomer, now he knew that he was a federal agent, and their alliance was an uneasy and unhappy one, ultimately. The late Walker, never the most convincing actor, has to give a real performance as an agent ambivalent about the requirements of his job, and the surrogate family he clearly betrayed. His surprisingly palpable apathy laced with regret makes the fourth film that best honors Walker’s legacy and proof of the star’s basic charisma.
 
The story in Fast and Furious, so named for both its familiarity and subtle grammatical immediacy, is ultimately minor, a mess of drug trafficking and Mexican border drama. John Ortiz’s Braga is probably the best and most clearly-defined villain of all the films thus far, however, and the heroes’ basic motivation is simple: Revenge for the death of Letty (Michelle Rodriguez), Toretto’s girlfriend. The picture itself feels like a steroidal return to the elements in place from the first movie, and under Lin, the direction is crisp and exciting. An early foot chase where O’Connor pursues a perp was the best action sequence at that point in the series. Lin even gets Han in on the action, despite the character’s death in the third film—a line of dialogue implies the film occurs before the events of Tokyo Drift, an audacious nugget that transfixed fans. How does Toretto find himself in Tokyo? Why is O’Connor not in Tokyo? The earlier films were coming from somewhere. Fast and Furious was going somewhere.


 
Perhaps learning humility, perhaps having too good a time, and perhaps realizing that the rest of their careers were a non-event, Walker and Diesel gladly returned for Fast Five. The novelty of this fifth entry, however, wasn’t that it was returning the successful parts of the first film, but that it was rejoining the elements from all the films thus far. Lin was back in the director’s chair, and so was Sung Kang’s Han. Matt Schultze’s shady Vince returned from the first film, Tyrese’s Roman and Ludacris’ Tej from part two, Tego (Tego Calderon), Santos (Don Omar) and Gisele (Gal Gadot) from part four. Fan service is one thing, like when a Joker card is revealed at the end of Batman Begins. But fan reward is rare, and rejoining the stronger elements of all these films felt like a “thanks” from the creators to the fans who had followed every film. And once again, someone suggests to Han that he should go to Tokyo, another sly acknowledgement of the third film.
 
Fast Five cemented the group as a gang and as a family, with Toretto in charge. No longer were they street racing: Now they were Robin Hoods, stealing from the rich to live comfortably off the grid. Fast Five still finds Diesel and Walker in front, but it feels like more of an ensemble, foregrounding one of the key elements of this franchise’s appeal. Unlike other film series’, this one had cross-racial appeal. Walker and Schultze were the lone white guys in the gang, while Diesel’s Toretto always carried an undetermined ethnicity. Tyrese and Ludacris were black Americans, while Calderon and Omar would always be chattering to each other in Spanish, and the shapely Gadot had Israeli lineage, and Kang’s Han Seoul-Oh was Korean. With studios uncertain about greenlighting blockbusters with minority leads, these films had proudly waved their multicultural heritage.
 
Lin and company also knew that simply re-assembling old parts would grow tiresome to the audience, so additional ingredients were necessary, in this case adding, for the first time, a formidable antagonist to the franchise. The mammoth Dwayne Johnson is Agent Hobbs, a car-freak right on their tails and posing, for the first time, a serious physical threat to Diesel and company. Johnson’s the biggest star this series has seen thus far, literally and figuratively, and Lin showcases a sly wit in a foot chase when the hulking Diesel turns around to see what massive behemoth is actually chasing them. Hobbs and Toretto end up having a common enemy, but that doesn’t stop the film from realizing that a Diesel versus Johnson fistfight is the sort of thing even non-Fast and Furious fans waited to see. Playing to the fans was fine, but Johnson’s addition ensured that this series was also trying to recruit those that hadn’t yet sampled the series, a gesture towards new fans that these films offered fresh spectacle beyond burning rubber.


 
Fast Five also wisely borrowed from other blockbusters, specifically superhero films, to keep interest alive. A post-credits sequence, establishing that Hobbs works with Eva Mendes’ Agent Fuentes from 2 Fast 2 Furious, guarantees one more final original part: Letty lives. Dominic’s old girlfriend would end up being enough of a draw for Fast & Furious 6, with the series at this point relying on the strength of the core group (Tego and Santos are conspicuously absent, however). Hobbs ends up recruiting Toretto’s crew in a heist movie set-up: Letty is assisting an automotive terrorist named Owen Shaw (Luke Evans), who bla bla bla superweapon bla bla bla free world: It’s all generic blockbuster stuff, an excuse to have Dominic and Letty banter with each other about what used to be.
 
It’s also an excuse for big screen action: Fast & Furious 6 has by far the best and most expensive action sequences of the series, with Lin juggling multiple vehicles in several moments of controlled chaos. The series also manages to spotlight battles outside of the car as well: Fans don’t know much about Gina Carano or Joe Taslim, but Lin doesn’t need to do much of anything aside from film them to make them seem like stars. You want to add new blood, but you want to surprise audiences as well, so that when Taslim lingers in the background like just another henchman, you don’t expect him to eventually dominate both Tyrese’s Roman and Kang’s Han in combat.
 
By part six, a franchise needs to have a bit of confidence, and Fast & Furious 6 shows this by laying on the continuity heavily. The film’s close is meant to mirror a moment in The Fast and the Furious, with Dominic and Letty reunited, and Brian and Dominic’s sister Mia (Jordana Brewster) nursing a child. The ending also establishes that Han is finally on his way to Tokyo, with a post-credits sequence replaying, without context, his death from The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift. But this time, we see who caused the crash: Owen Shaw’s brother, Ian Shaw. To be in the theater when Jason Statham climbed out of the car to reveal himself as Ian is to hear the sound of the sort of celebration reserved for the knockout punch in a prizefight. Johnson, a formidable presence in his two films in the series, was scary and threatening, but the baggage he brought with him was having featured in a number of kids’ films and generally being everyone’s favorite gentle giant. Statham, who has almost primarily fronted R-rated action films where his heroes freely snap the necks off their enemies, is a whole other ballgame.


 
The seventh film was recently shooting for a summer ’14 release, though there has been a death in the family: Paul Walker passed on, the fatal result of an off-set car crash. Filming has been postponed indefinitely as the cast, crew and studio mourns. There’s reason to believe the movie will start back up again, and it’s an awful loss to everyone involved. It’s likely the series will re-invent itself once again to cope with the loss of Walker’s O’Connor.
 
At the same time, Fast & Furious 6 was the biggest film in the franchise, and the fan outpouring for the loss of Walker suggests this series could endure and grow even more. These films have made a tradition out of repairing and re-adjusting what happened in the last film, and it’s sad to see that it now involves the presence of Mr. Walker. Were it not for him, this franchise would not have a foundation from which to change and evolve. Because of his contributions, this series is essentially the ideal franchise. Because of his contributions, it’s likely to continue that way. Fast & Furious 6 drops on Blu-ray this week and will likely make a clean getaway, because Walker and the rest of the franchise’s parts were finely tuned in crafting the perfect and most rare of blockbusters in the modern era: A customized original.
 
***Thanks for reading. And again, if you are interested in donating to the non-profit charity founded by Paul Walker, please visit the Reach Out Worldwide website.

Disqus - noscript

Enjoyed your analysis of the franchise. I still haven't seen the 6th one but plan to soon.

The Edge of Tomorrow Trailer is Here

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/11/2013 at 1:14PM

Check out the trailer for next summer's Groundhog Day-like alien invasion war film starring Tom Cruise and Emily Blunt.

After a week of viral teasing, the trailer for Tom Cruise’s Edge of Tomorrow has arrived.
 
In the future, an inexperienced military commander (Tom Cruise) must lead his men into a suicide mission of a battle…resulting in their instant deaths. But when Lt. Col. Bill Cage wakes up, he is alive and forced to relive the battle again. Each day brings a new challenge as he fights to stay alive. Also starring Emily Blunt as Special Forces officer Rita, the film is directed by Doug Liman (The Bourne Identity, Mr. & Mrs. Smith).
 
 
Edge of Tomorrow will be released on June 6, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Jason Clarke Eying John Connor Role in Terminator: Genesis

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/11/2013 at 2:08PM

Jason Clarke is currently in talks to star as John Connor, future savior of humanity, in the Terminator reboot.

The Terminator reboot (now tentatively titled Terminator: Genesis) continues to press ahead like a tireless cyborg bent on making its mission objective of a plum July 2015 release date.
 
Enter Jason Clarke who, according to Deadline, is now reporting is in talks to play John Connor in this reboot of the original 1984 film. It is intriguing for multiple reasons. Firstly, Jason Clarke is a fantastic actor and more than stole his scenes as a CIA interrogator with increasing hardship in Zero Dark Thirty. Surely he could expand that to being the savior of humanity’s future (with the initials J.C. no less?).
 
Clarke, who will next be seen in Fox’s Dawn of the Planet of the Apes sequel in summer 2014 and is currently set to shoot Everest with Baltasar Kormakur, would obviously play John Connor in a post-apocalyptic world when he knowingly sends his future father, Kyle Reese (still uncast), to protect his mother in the past and also to simultaneously sire his birth. This would be a different and possibly intriguing take on the material.
 
Jason Clarke is also not the only actor of that surname currently circling the project. English ingénue (and no relation) Emilia Clarke of Game of Thrones is also the current frontrunner to play Sarah Connor, John’s mother. From Mother of Dragons to Mother of Humanity, it might make sense.
 
Terminator: Genesis boots up on July 2, 2015.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Robert Knepper Cast as Original Character in Hunger Games: Mockingjay

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/11/2013 at 2:32PM

Character actor Robert Knepper has been cast as "Antonius," an original character not from Suzanne Collins' novels, in The Hunger Games: Mockingjay films.

Who says that The Hunger Games franchise splitting Mockingjay in half is not ambitious enough? Lionsgate has revealed via their Facebook page that character actor Robert Knepper has been cast as Antonius, an original character having not appeared in Suzanne Collins’ trilogy of books and source material.
 
Slated to appear in both MockingjayPart 1and Part 2, it is still somewhat vague as to who the character is though it is possible that with two films, the resistance of District 13 is going to be more detailed and hard fighting than previously thought.
 
Knepper is a face you have likely seen before, as he is currently seen in TNT’s Mob City, and has appeared in shows and films like Heroes, Shameless, Carnavale, The Day the Earth Stood Still, and Good Night, and Good Luck.
 
Knepper will be joining an expanding cast of new faces, including Julianne Moore, Natalie Dormer and Lily Rabe. The series will also of course see the return of Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth, Elizabeth Banks, Woody Harrelson, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Jeffrey Wright, Jena Malone, Stanley Tucci, Donald Sutherland and, of course, Jennifer Lawrence.
 
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire helmer Francis Lawrence will return as director for both Mockingjayfilms, scheduled for November 2014 and November 2015, respectively.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Samuel L. Jackson to Star in Tarzan?

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/11/2013 at 2:48PM

Samuel L. Jackson is in talks to star alongside Alexander Skarsgard and Christoph Waltz in David Yates' new vision for Tarzan.

It is a modern adage that Samuel L. Jackson really should be in every movie, and Warner Brothers clearly agrees, as they are currently in talks to cast the actor in a yet unspecified role for their Tarzan reboot.
 
As reported in Variety, Jackson is in negotiation with the studio to come aboard the project, which already has Alexander Skarsgard (True Blood) and Christoph Waltz (Inglourious Basterds, Django Unchained) set to star.
 
The studio has struggled producing this film, despite it being spearheaded by WB favorite David Yates. Yates, who directed the last four Harry Potter films, has gone through a number of pre-production delays in getting this project off the ground, which finally got the greenlight after he showed studio heads a five minute video presentation about what his vision would be for a new film based on the Edgar Rice Burroughs character.
 
Jackson had been previously approached for the role, but had to pass due to delays. When the unspecified role went to Jamie Foxx, he too was forced to pass after the greenlight was held back again, but now Jackson is back in the running.
 
Skarsgard is set to play the titular hero, and interest is keen on who will play his love interest, the sophisticated Jane. According to that same Variety article, the studio is very keen on casting Margot Robbie of The Wolf of Wall Street in the role, however she has yet to be offered the part.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

James McAvoy Confirms He’ll Play Xavier Again

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/11/2013 at 3:18PM

James McAvoy talks about his surprise at hearing of X-Men: Apocalypse, his interest in returning to the character, and how Days of Future Past is a departure for himself and the audience.

While working the red carpet line at the British Independent Film Awards, actor James McAvoy took a moment to answer a few questions about his role as Charles Xavier in the X-Men films, particularly X-Men: Days of Future Pastand X-Men: Apocalypse.
 
First, while speaking with Red Carpet News TV, McAvoy stated that he was as surprised as anyone when director Bryan Singer tweeted that the next X-film, X-Men: Apocalypse, will be upon us in May 2016.
 
“I only heard about it this morning,” The Scottish actor exclaimed. But ash e told the interviewer a little later, “I’m contracted to [return], and yes I would,” he said excitedly.
 
He also took the time to reflect upon his arc as Charles Xavier across X-Men: First Class and Days of Future Past.
 
“The personal pleasure for me in First Class was presenting a Charles Xavier to the fans, but also a new audience, who's very different from the Charles that you expected. But he was still very sort of 'Everything's going good,' you know? In the second movie I get to present another version of Charles Xavier who's still very different from the Charles that used to exist, but he's also remarkably different from the Charles in First Class as well. So what's great is that even though it's a sequel, even though it's a franchise, I keep getting to reinvent Charles Xavier and that's amazing. I've got to do it twice now, because the Charles in this film is unrecognizable from the Charles in the last film as well unrecognizable from the Charles played by Patrick Stewart, who I then get to face up to. That's sort of theatrical almost, it's like we're playing a game with the audience saying ‘Look at the many faces of Charles, Patrick, Stewart-Xavier, McAvoy’ It's really good fun.”
 
 
X-Men: Days of Future Past arrives on 23, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

4 New Posters For Dawn of The Planet of the Apes

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/11/2013 at 3:59PM

Check out the four new posters for Fox's upcoming summer 2014 Dawn of the Planet of the Apes!

It is still hard to believe that after all this time, Fox was able to so successfully resuscitate the Planet of the Apes franchise. If one can recall Summer 2011, it was clear that Rise of the Planet of the Apes was on nobody’s radar. Yet, the film turned out to be the biggest surprise of the season with great action and even greater authenticity thanks to a heartwarming motion-capture performance by Andy Serkis as Caesar. Fortune may favor the bold as Fox has again taken a step forward by doing the next film without the marquee name of James Franco. Indeed, superb character actors Jason Clarke, Keri Russell and Gary Oldman are getting to lead an ensemble that still sports Serkis as Caesar in a world where the Apes truly rule. And with Matt Reeves at the helm, director of the vastly underrated Let Me In, Fox again has a mystery box of a franchise film that we cannot wait to unwrap.
 




 
A growing nation of genetically evolved apes led by Caesar is threatened by a band of human survivors of the devastating virus unleashed a decade earlier. They reach a fragile peace, but it proves short-lived, as both sides are brought to the brink of a war that will determine who will emerge as Earth's dominant species.

The dawn comes July 11, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Frank Grillo to headline The Purge 2

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew12/12/2013 at 7:40AM

The sequel to The Purge is set to star Frank Grillo, it's been revealed...

The sequel to The Purge is on something of a tight schedule, with the current plan being to have the movie in cinemas in June of 2014. All concerned are thus getting their proverbial skates on, and it's not been announced that Frank Grillo has been cast in the lead this time around.

There are no formal plot details yet, although we do know that James DeMonaco is back on writing and directing duties.  We also know that the movie is due in cinemas on June 20th 2014, and that means a tight schedule for DeMonaco and his team.

Frank Grillo will also be seen next year in Captain America: The Winter Soldier, incidentally.

Source.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

The top 30 underrated films of 2002

$
0
0
Odd ListRyan Lambie12/12/2013 at 7:55AM

The year of Baggins, Potter and Spider-Man also had a wealth of lesser-known movies. Here’s our pick of 2002's underappreciated films...

At the top of the box office tree, 2002 was dominated by fantasy and special effects. Peter Jackson's The Lord Of The RingsThe Two Towers made almost a billion dollars all by itself, with Harry Potter And The Chamber Of Secrets taking second place and Sam Raimi's Spider-Man not too far behind.

In many ways, 2002 set the tempo for the Hollywood blockbuster landscape, which has changed relatively little in the decade since. A quick look at 2013‘s top 10, for example, reveals a markedly similar mix of superhero movies, with Iron Man 3 still ruling the roost at the time of writing, followed by effects-heavy action flicks and family-friendly animated features.

As usual in these lists, we're looking at the less celebrated films of 2002 - the kinds of movies that not only didn't make the top 10, but also failed to get either the financial or critical attention they deserved. Compiling such a list is incredibly tricky, especially when it comes to films that didn't do particularly well in cinemas, but have become adored by a legion fans since - which explains why, with heavy heart, we decided to leave Richard Kelly's wonderful Donnie Darko off the list and concentrate on less celebrated films instead.

So without further ado, here's our pick of 30 underappreciated films from 2002...

30. Impostor

When thinking about the movie adaptations of visionary sci-fi author Philip K Dick, it’s likely that a handful of films will spring to mind: most obviously Blade Runner and Total Recall, followed by Minority Report and A Scanner Darkly, then maybe the less-than-brilliant Paycheck and Next.

The sorely overlooked Impostor, directed by Gary Fleder and based on the 1953 short story of the same name, isn’t in the same league as the very best PKD adaptations, but it’s still full of the twists and existential crises you’d expect. It’s set in a distant future where invading aliens are capable of creating replicant spies that are almost indistinguishable from humans - that is, until they detonate with deadly effect.

Gary Sinise plays a weapons designer who falls under suspicion of the authorities, and spends the rest of the movie attempting to convince everybody he’s not a deadly weapon forged by extraterrestrials. Madeleine Stowe, Mekhi Phifer and Vincent D’Onofrio round out a great supporting cast, and Mark Isham provides some decent music.

Oddly,  Impostor  actually looks less expensive than its not-bad $40m budget might imply, but it’s the quality of the acting (in particular from the ever-reliable Sinise) and the story that makes this a science fiction movie well worth watching.

29. The Quiet American

The first of two Phillip Noyce movies that we're going to talk about on this list, The Quiet American is an adaptation of Graham Greene's novel, and casts Michael Caine as an experienced British reporter and Brendan Fraser - who once had a great knack for mixing in blockbuster roles with interesting projects such as this - as a young American, with the two both attracted to the same Vietnamese woman.

Caine's performance is what anchors the movie, and unsurprisingly, he was Oscar nominated for it. But there are qualities dripping right through the rest of the movie. The political subtext adds weight, whilst there's a feeling of unease that Noyce successfully cultivates throughout. Beautifully shot, The Quiet American is a treat that grips from pretty much the get go.

28. Bubba Ho-Tep

Full disclosure: the oddball premise behind Bubba Ho-Tep made us approach it with some trepidation when it appeared on disc years ago, but there's far more going on in Don Coscarelli's horror comedy than mere goofy charm. But first, that premise: Bruce Campbell plays an eldlerly Elvis Presley, who after faking his death is now living out his final days in a godforsaken nursing home. Unfortunately, the reanimated corpse of an Egyptian mummy is roaming the corridors in search of tasty souls to devour.

Beyond the puerile yet often very funny comedy moments, there's an unusually touching story tucked away in here about the inevitability of death and the struggle to find a sense of dignity and peace in old age - weighty themes for a horror movie, not least one packed wall to wall with  flying killer insects, souls dragged from backsides, and African American acting legend Ossie Davis playing an elderly man who claims to be John F Kennedy in disguise.

Campbell was born to play the part of an ornery old Elvis, and Bubba Ho-Tep is surely one of his finest and most moving performances. It's also a fine movie from Coscarelli, who specialises in little-seen cult films - for a more recent underappreciated gem, track down a copy of the John Dies At The End, another sterling cocktail of comedy and gore.

27. Deathwatch

Horror writers are always looking around for new and unusual situations, and while plenty of genre films have been set in World War II, relatively few have tackled the Great War, which tore through Europe between the years 1914-1918. Writer and director Michael J Bassett’s Deathwatch plunges us deep into the trenches and barbwire-strewn battlefields of this devastating war.

Jamie Bell, Hugo Speer, Laurence Fox and Andy Serkis are among the British troops who become lost among a network of German trenches, and slowly realise that something evil is stalking them. Bassett’s brilliantly chosen cast  ably depicts the madness and trauma of conflict, and that’s before the supernatural horrors have even kicked in.

Admittedly, the story doesn’t always satisfy as it should, but we’d argue that critics were a bit too harsh on what is an atmospheric and disturbing movie - full of grime and squalor, its plot is forgettable, but its atmosphere is difficult to shake.

26. The Good Girl

Aim as many barbs as you like at Jennifer Aniston's movie career - as some tabloid columnists seem determined to do - but she's consistently had a knack of choosing interesting movie projects to tackle. The Good Girl, from Miguel Arteta, was arguably the first time she's got the critical notices she deserved, but even before this, she'd signed up to do movies such as The Iron Giant, Office Space and She's The One. We never got the memo that we weren't supposed to like her, we're glad to say.

The Good Girl is written by Mike White (who also penned the wonderful Chuck & Buck), and follows Aniston's store worker who starts up a relationship with an unusual young helper in said store, played by Jake Gyllenhaal. There's a sadness to Aniston's character, and to the entire movie as a consequence, as she's trapped in an unhappy marriage, and stuck in an unhappy life.

Quality support comes from the brilliant John C Reilly, and there's a good role for Zooey Deschanel too, who does some of the comedy lifting here. But credit to Aniston for taking on and making such a rounded lead role her own. And credit too to director Miguel Arteta - who would go on to make Cedar Rapids and Youth In Revolt - for keeping the tone of such a delicate story.

25. Laurel Canyon

It's somewhat dull to say that Frances McDormand has put in another excellent acting performance here, given that we can't remember a time when she hasn't. Laurel Canyon is one of her lesser-seen projects though, and that's something of a shame.

She stars alongside Christian Bale and Kate Beckinsale, in a movie that sees a young couple move into the home of the husband-to-be's mother. Bale and Beckinsale play the couple, McDormand is the mother, and if you suspect that tensions and inappropriateness ensue, then you're on the right track.

It's a movie with problems, certainly, but Laurel Canyon still has enough going on to make it more than justify a watch. Furthermore, McDormand is quite brilliant, and writer/director Lisa Cholodenko - who would go on to make the wonderful The Kids Are All Right - wrings plenty out of the setup.

24. The Good Thief

A taut, twisty thriller from Neil Jordan, The Good Thief also gives a rare and much appreciated leading role to Nick Nolte. He takes the title role, with his character living in France, battling addictions and failing to resist the chance to take on a particularly lucrative job in Monte Carlo.

Jordan makes the most of his unusual French setting, and his stylish movie is well cast even beyond Nolte. There's an uncredited turn from Ralph Fiennes for a start, but credit to Nutsa Kukhianidze and Tcheky Karyo too.

Yet this is Nolte's movie, in a troubled, three-dimensional role that he inhabits with utter conviction. It's a very loose remake of a French movie by the name of Bob le Flambeur, and a good one at that. If you're a sucker for a good crime drama, with an outstanding lead performance, The Good Thief is a really compelling piece of work.

23. Death To Smoochy

Back in the 1990s and early 2000s, FilmFour was well on its way to becoming a British powerhouse. It funded or part-funded a stream of interesting movies, and gave many British filmmakers a much needed break. By 2002 though, after a string of disappointments, it needed a hit. In fact, it needed its $5m investment in Danny DeVito's Death To Smoochy to pay off. The total budget for the movie was $55m. The movie would gross less than $10m at the box office. FilmFour shut down in its original form at the end of 2002.

Death To Smoochy attracted some vitriolic reviews at the time, and we can't stand before you and declare it a full-on classic. But it is an interesting, challenging piece of work, headlined by Robin Williams as he was seeking out darker material. Co-starring Edward Norton, the movie follows a children's TV host who is fired and replaced by a Rhino character by the name of Smoochy. It's a very grown-up and satirical comedy that ensues, and one far better than its reputation suggests. It may forever be entwined with the story of an era coming to an end, but that's no reason to write an ambitious, difficult movie off.

22. Wilbur Wants To Kill Himself

A great title, and a really good movie this. Wilbur, played by James Sives, is not happy, and feeling suicidal. Along with his brother though, he inherits his father's seocnd hand bookshop. Located in Glasgow, said bookshop is visited by Lisa McKinlay's Mary (along with her mother), and there's a connection between her and Wilbur that the movie moves on to explore.

It's a moving piece of movie theater this, that doesn't just explore the character of Wilbur, but also the people he affects (his brother in particular). Uniformly excellent performances help, but the screenplay from director Lone Schefig and Anders Thomas Jensen is exquisitely pitched, finding dark humor in the midst of what could have been a very melancholy movie.

Schefig would go on to make the excellent An Education (and she also tackled the movie adaptation of One Day), but this arguably remains her best movie. It's crying out to be discovered by a larger audience, and at the time of writing is just £4 at Amazon. That, friends, is a bargain.

21. Equilibrium

A few years before Christian Bale took on the mantle of the Dark Knight, he donned a black outfit of another kind for this futuristic action flick by Kurt Wimmer. The stylish coats and stylised violence gave the impression of a low-rent Matrix rip-off in trailers, but in reality, it's more akin to George Orwell with added martial arts.

Bale plays John Preston, a particularly talented member of a government force tasked with wiping out any cultural artefect held by so-called “sense offenders". In this particular future dystopia, all emotion is kept strictly in check, and stimulating things like books, films and paintings are rooted out and destroyed by Preston and his order of Grammaton Clerics. But when Preston stops taking his state-supplied drugs (designed to further suppress emotion) and sides with an subway resistance group, he starts to use his ‘Gun Kata' fighting skills to fight the Totalitarian establishment instead.

Throwing together ideas from all over the place - a bit of Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 here, a healthy dose of John Woo there - Equilibrium couldn't be described as an original movie, but it is a compelling one. Wimmer's use of Berlin locations creates an appropriately chilly, imposing atmosphere, and there's a great cast alongside Bale, including Emily Watson, Sean Bean (you can probably guess how his character fares) and William Fichtner.

20. The Cat Returns

Fans of Studio Ghibli's output will probably be wondering what on earth this entry's doing here, but we'd argue that, for many people in the west, The Cat Returns is among the least well-known of the Japanese animation house's works. About a young girl who has an unusual ability to talk to cats, The Cat Returns is a kind of feline Alice In Wonderland, as the heroine ventures into a mystical Cat Kingdom. Extremely funny and beautifully animated, The Cat Returns is full of charm and personality- the chubby, slightly surly cat Muta, in particular, is an exquisite creation. A kind of spin-off from Studio Ghibli's earlier Whisper Of The Heart (Baron is the returning cat from that movie, hence the title), The Cat Returns isn't the best of Studio Ghibli's films, but it's still seldom less than captivating.

19. Secretary

A drama about a meek secretary dominated by her boss could so easily have emerged as a smirking, puerile effort, but writer and director Steven Shainberg's Secretary is instead a mature and elegant movie, and laces its kinky subject matter with a pleasing thread of wit. Maggie Gyllenhaal plays the secretary in question, while James Spader (who's no stranger to quirky or difficult roles) is her boss.

Slow-burning yet constantly compelling, Secretary explores its central relationship impeccably, with Gyllenhaal and Spader both excellent as likeable people whose fetishes happen to overlap. The movie's conclusion is a little too muted to satisfy, perhaps, but the journey towards it is eminently watchable.

18. Morvern Callar

We’re not quite sure what went wrong behind the scenes of the forthcoming Jane Got A Gun, but we hope the negative publicity surrounding director Lynne Ramsay’s abrupt exit from the production doesn’t prevent her from making more things in the future, because as films like 1999‘s Ratcatcher, 2011‘s We Need To Talk About Kevin and this one, adapted from the novel of the same name, shows just how talented a filmmaker she is.

A simple story about a young woman (played by Samantha Morton) who puts her own name on the manuscript of her late boyfriend’s unpublished novel, Morvern Callar is a brilliantly acted and superbly made, expertly treading the line between comedy and pathos. Although it made a pittance on its limited theatrical release, Morvern Callar is well worth tracking down on disc - Samantha Morton’s turned in plenty of great performances in her career so far, but this one is easily among her best.

17. Rabbit-Proof Fence

We've already talked about The Quiet American here, but Phillip Noyce also saw his adaptation of Doris Pilkington's Rabbit-Proof Fence released in 2002. This, too, is an excellent movie, set in 1930s Australia and following three young Aboriginal girls who are taken from their homes to work as servants. The three girls escape, and begin the 1500 walk home along the fenceline in search of home.

Based on a true story, and with real footage added at the end, Rabbit-Proof Fence finds levity in the midst of a horrible tale, and the young leads - playing opposite Kenneth Branagh's officer leading the charge to track them down - add a warm and very human feel to the movie. It's an accomplished and strongly realised take on the story, deliberately taking its time - even appreciating its brief 94 minute run - to get its moments across.

16. Frailty

Save for one festival appearance at the end of 2001, Frailty was rolled out properly in 2002, hence we've included it in this round-up, rather than our 2001 piece. Wherever we'd put it though, Bill Paxton's directorial debut is a piece of work that gets under the proverbial skin.

Paxton and Matthew McConaughey take the lead roles, and Frailty centres on a heavily religious father and the relationship with his two sons. You might think there's a very slight Carrie parallel in there, but Frailty is a different kind of horror. There's an awful lot going on under the surface here, and Paxton's quite uncompromising in his approach. He trades off just a little bit of accessibility in favor of a deeper movie.

It crosses genres, refuses to paint the father - played by Paxton himself - as an outright villain, and doesn't shirk some of the big moments, which we won't reveal here. It's a difficult movie to watch, but ultimately, a very rewarding one.

We've had to split this one over two pages. We don't make a habit of this, and we're not doing it as some trick to get ad impressions or anything. It just tends to make longer pieces more manageable if we do this.

Welcome to page 2. The problem with us splitting an article over two pages is that we have to write a bit of material up here, else it knocks the formatting out at the top of the page. We've done that now, so let's move on with the list...

15. Once Upon A Time In The Midlands

There aren't enough westerns set in the East Midlands, and not for the first time, it leaves us thankful that Britain has a director such as Shane Meadows willing to right this particular wrong. Meadows, who co-wrote the movie with Paul Fraser, actually puts together something more akin to a romantic comedy than a western here, in truth, and a really very funny one. The catalyst is when Rhys Ifans' character proposes to his girlfriend on television. The problem? Robert Carlyle's Jimmy happens to be watching the television at that very moment, and he thinks said girlfriend - played by Shirley Henderson - should be with him. Thus, off he heads to Nottingham to try and win her back.

It's arguably Meadows' lightest movie - he'd follow it up with Dead Man's Shoes and This Is England - and frequently a very funny one. Furthermore, there are super performances all round, and you end up buying even the more far-fetched moments of the movie. There's no shortage of heart to this one, and whilst Once Upon A Time In The Midlands feels just a little like the forgotten Shane Meadows movie, it's one of the best British films of the early 2000s.

14. One Hour Photo

There's a tragic, unsettling atmosphere to One Hour Photo, which was marketed as a thriller but emerges as a character study about Robin Williams' lonely photo developer Sy Parrish. Single, lonely and obsessive, Sy becomes infatuated with the seemingly perfect family whose pictures he develops month after month. And when Sy notices a fissure running down the middle of this family he idolises, he grows increasingly irrational.

Featuring one of Williams' very best performances, One Hour Photo is a quietly affecting drama, with its sense of loneliness and detachment underlined by some magnificent production design - the store where Syworks is like a light-bathed fantasy world, which contasts sharply with the austere emptiness of his home. A movie which did only middling business, One Hour Photo was compromised by some studio-enforced edits and reshoots, but  still emerges as a potent piece of filmmaking thanks to Mark Romanek's intelligent writing and direction, and of course Williams' bravely unshowy, leading turn.

13. Cypher

This sci-fi thriller directed by Vincenzo Natalli is efficient and absorbing, with a great leading turn from Jeremy Northam. He plays an ordinary, somewhat beige former accountant who's drawn into a murky world of corporate espionage, only to be dragged into an even deadlier intrigue involving engineered identities and betrayal. At its strongest when Northam's character uncovers the layers of lies and corporate double dealing, and at its weakest when it devolves into a more straightforward action movie at the end (at which point the very low budget becomes apparent), Cypher's nevertheless a cracking sci-fi conspiracy, full of paranoia worthy of vintage Philip K Dick.

12. Infernal Affairs

A knotty and enthralling Hong Kong thriller about  a criminal who infiltrates the police force, and an undercover cop who passes himself off as a Triad gangster, Infernal Affairs is something of a classic. A hit in Hong Kong (where it spawned two very good sequels), it’s since become a cult movie in the west. So why include it here? Because, like so many great foreign-language films, it was the subject of a remake (Martin Scorsese’s The Departed in 2006), which seems like as good a reason as any to recommend the original.

Loaded with tension, briskly told and immaculately filmed, Infernal Affairs is one of the best crime thrillers in any language. Tony Leung and Andy Lau make for a great pair of co-stars in a story of deception and violence, and are arguably a match for Leonardo Di Captio and Matt Damon in the US version. To his credit, Scorsese didn’t go down the usual remake path, and instead forged a movie of his own with Infernal Affairs’ premise as his inspiration. For us, though, the HK original just edges it as the superior movie.

11. Sympathy For Mr Vengeance

Many cinemagoers in the west first encountered the work of director Park Chan-Wook through his 2003 thriller, Oldboy. But Sympathy For Mr Vengeance came first, the opening instalment in Park’s Vengeance trilogy, which concluded with 2005‘s Sympathy For Lady Vengeance.

If you’ve seen Oldboy, you’ll probably know what to expect: sumptuous visuals, an uncompromisingly brutal story, and graphic violence. Shin Ha-kyun plays a deaf-mute factory worker who resorts to unpleasant measures to pay for his desperately ill sister’s kidney transplant, and brings ruin on himself in the process. A disturbing yet hypnotic movie, Sympathy For Mr Vengeance depicts a grim world where there are no heroes and villains, only poor choices and dire consequences.

Both Oldboy and Lady Vengeance made around 10 times as much at the box office, but Sympathy For Mr Vengeance is arguably their equal. If you haven’t seen Sympathy or Lady Vengeance yet, do track them down before someone in Hollywood greenlights another ill-advised remake or two.

10. Home Room

Busy Philipps remains arguably best known for her excellent work on the television show Freaks & Geeks, but she's one of the cornerstones of this hard-edged indie drama, ultimately based in part on the Columbine High School massacre of April 1999. Its uncomfortably close release to those events certainly can't have helped Home Room find much of an audience, although the director made a point of showing the staff, students and parents at the school a preview of the movie.

And this is a bold piece of work, written and directed by Paul F Ryan, that attempts to discover the reasons behind such atrocities. The focus is very much on the aftermath, with the people left behind to cope with what happened, and the movie frames this through Philipps' Alicia and Erika Christensen's Deanna.

Home Room never goes for easy answers, and that doesn't help make it any more comfortable to watch. But it does feel like a more important piece of work than it's generally regarded as. It's a very human response to something so inhuman, pitched and played very well. It's not easy to track down, but it is worth the effort.

9. The Dangerous Lives Of Altar Boys

A real gem, this. Based in part on the novel by the late Chris Fuhrman, The Dangerous Lives Of Altar Boys follows a bunch of boys at a Catholic school in the 1970s. Said boys - who included Emile Hirsch and Kieran Culkin - get up to the usual assortment of pranks. But they also pool their efforts for their own comic book, and find themselves constantly at odds with Jodie Foster's Sister Assumpta.

British director Peter Care's intelligent adaptation of the source material intersperses animation with live action, and he balances the coming of age themes with real intelligence. It arrives in a run of films that were winning acclaim for their portrayal of school life, yet The Dangerous Lives Of Altar Boys deserves to stand toe to toe with many of them. As it happened, it only received a limited movie theater rollout, and has been left to be found on DVD. Ignore the terrible cover of the British disc release: this is excellent.

8. Confessions Of A Dangerous Mind

George Clooney's second movie as director, Good Night And Good Luck, attracted serious Oscar attention. Deservedly, too. Confessions Of A Dangerous Mind, his first, is similarly rooted in real life events, but is a very different, very offbeat beast. It also boasts arguably Sam Rockwell's best screen performance to date, outside of Moon.

Rockwell plays game show host and producer Chuck Barris, a man who claimed to have been hired as an assassin by the CIA. And as a one-star review at Amazon perfectly puts it, "if you want to watch a movie about a guy whose life was so vacuous that he had to try to make it interesting by writing an autobiography pretending to be employed as a hitman by the CIA, then this movie is for you".

Charlie Kaufman (of Adaptation fame) penned the script for this one, and Clooney handles it maturely, frequently destabilising the audience and heightening the often uncomfortable comedy. Confessions Of A Dangerous Mind may not, ultimately, be to everyone's tastes. But there is a strong argument for it being Clooney's best movie as director yet. And it does reward as many viewings as you are willing to give it.

7. The Magdalene Sisters

We talked about Peter Mullan back we looked at the underappreciated movies of 1998, with his superb dark comedy, Orphans. For his third movie as director, the darkness remained but the comedy is long gone, as Mullan tackled the haunting story of The Magdalene Sisters. He focuses on four teenage girls who were sent to what was known as the Magdalene Asylum in Ireland. Each was regarded as a sinner by their families, and they were put under the strict stewardship of the Madalene nuns.

It's a superb movie, but good grief, it's a diffiult one to watch. The despicable treatment of the young women, all under a banner of religion, is hard to stomach. And, of course, the story is very much based on truth.

Mullan doesn't direct very often, but when he does, he has a legitimate claim to be called one of the very best contemporary British directors. And this one might just be his best.

6. Solaris

Stanislaw Lem's stunning science fiction novel Solaris has been adapted multiple times - once for Russian television, for the big screen by the great Andrei Tarkovsky, and then one further time by Steven Soderbergh. Where the novel was a kind of detective story on a space station, Soderbergh's Solaris is a meditative sci-fi love story. George Clooney plays a psychologist who's despatched to a space station orbiting the sentient planet Solaris, and is haunted by the appearance of his late wife made flesh.

Beautiful to look at and sublimely acted by Clooney and Natascha McElhone as his ethereal revenant wife, Solaris is shot through with an atmosphere of sadness and regret - a tone which predictably failed to help its box office performance, but also makes for a cerebral, unusual and quite brilliant sci-fi movie.

5. Spider

Ralph Fiennes puts aside any hint of Hollywood glamour for the title role in David Cronenberg’s minimal, eerie drama, and his performance is all the more remarkable for its lack of dialogue - the inner turmoil of a disturbed man (with a disturbing past) is conveyed through his awkward movements and expressions.

A moving and unshakeably sad journey through the character's fragmented childhood memories, Spider is impeccably shot and acted, with brilliant supporting performances from Gabriel Byrne and especially Miranda Richardson, who pops up multiple times through the movie in different roles. Well received by critics after a screening at Cannes, Spider was given a mystifyingly low-key general release which made it nigh-on impossible to track down in cinemas.

It’s well worth tracking down on disc, though, with Fiennes turning in a career-best performance, and Cronenberg proving once again that, although he’ll probably never quite escape the “king of venereal horror” label commonly applied to him, he remains an ace director of intelligent psychological dramas.

4. The Count Of Monte Cristo

To call The Count Of Monte Cristo a good, old-fashioned action blockbuster sells it a long, long way short. Based on Alexandre Dumas' often-adapted story of the same name, director Kevin Reynolds casts Jim Caviezel, at first an innocent and trusting count, who is betrayed by the brilliant Guy Pearce. Pearce proved he had movie-villain chops recently in Lawless, but here he's far more three dimensional, and it's one of his best three screen performances.

Caviezel's Count finds himself locked up with Richard Harris, and his quest for revenge begins roughly there. Director Reynolds sharpens the action tools he deployed well in Robin Hood: Prince Of Thieves, and his approach fits this darker, tense movie.

The old-fashioned label The Count Of Monte Cristo often gets bestowed with is testament to the fact that it doesn't cheat. It has rounded characters, doing understandable things, and stages quality action sequences when required. It's a really, really fun movie, and - here comes the cliche - the kind of swashbuckler they really don't make any more. One of the best action movies of the decade? It might just be...

3. Irreversible

Described in some places as a mystery thriller, we’d argue that director Gaspar Noe’s Irreversible is more akin to a horror drama. Its use of sound, intense colorand dizzying framing and editing create a sense of unease before anything even happens, and its minimal story about rape and revenge is painfully difficult to watch. With its events shown in reverse order, effectively making the end the beginning and vise versa, Irreversible is a blood-curdling examination of how one terrible crime leads to another.

Vincent Cassell is excellent as a boyfriend blinded by fury, while Monica Belucci deserves a medal for her performance as his girlfriend. Harrowing from start to finish, Irreversible isn’t likely to be a movie you’ll watch more than once, but its aggressive direction and imagery make it a difficult yet unforgettable experience.

2. In America

There's no shortage of love for the work of Paddy Considine around these parts, and In America is one of his most brilliant films. Directed by Jim Sheridan, he stars alongside the also-excellent Samantha Morton (who we'll always love for turning up at the Oscars wearing a T-shirt), and the movie follows them as a pair of Irish immigrants trying to make a new life in the US following the death of their youngest.

Theirs is no idyllic story of finding a warm America waiting for them though, as they struggle to put their family unit back together in trying and testing circumstances. There's one scene at the end in particular, a simple scene at a fairground, that's utterly heartbreaking.

Sheridan is a wise enough director to not overplay the emotional cards though (he also wrote the script with his daughters, Kirsten and Naomi), and he finds pockets of warmth and a real quest for humanity in the movie. Yet even saying that makes it sound trite, whereas In America simply couldn't be better pitched. It's played superbly well - if there was any justice, both leads would have snared Oscar nods for their work - and is an accessible, excellent story of trying to find a way forward through pain. A fabulous, fabulous movie.

1. Igby Goes Down

What are the required ingredients for a classic drama? A great cast? A word-perfect script? Confident direction? Writer and director Burr Steers’ Igby Goes Down has all three, and is arguably, for our money, the best drama of 2002. Kieran Culkin exudes a certain grumpy, outsider charm as the Holden Caulfield-like Igby, a teenager whose life is made a misery by his dysfunctional extended family. Susan Sarandon plays his icy mother. Bill Pullman (who’s unusually cast yet excellent) plays his clinically depressed father. Jeff Golblum plays his extraordinarily dislikeable douchebag godfather.

Although Igby’s background is a privileged one, he’s essentially a normal teen rebelling against repression, whether it’s the brutal punishment he receives at his military academy school (one of several seats of learning he’s sent to and swiftly banished from) or the stifling expectations of his family.

Artfully walking the line between wry wit and emotional drama, Igby Goes Down is impeccably written and performed, with Culkin carrying the picture with ease. Barely making a ripple at the box office, it's the very definition of an underrated movie: well-received by critics yet largely unheralded at awards ceremonies or in cinemas, it’s a quietly brilliant, hidden gem of a movie.

The top 25 underappreciated films of 2000

The top 25 underappreciated films of 2001

The 250 underappreciated films of the 1990s

Follow our Twitter feed for faster news and bad jokes right here. And be our Facebook friend here.

Get Inside Llewyn Davis With the Coen Brothers

$
0
0
InterviewDon Kaye12/12/2013 at 8:46AM

The iconoclastic filmmakers discuss their latest darkly comedic and slightly surreal gem, set in the early 1960s New York folk music scene.

With Inside Llewyn Davis, writer/directors/producers/editors Joel and Ethan Coen add another unique mini-masterwork to their already formidable filmography. Oscar Isaac, in an award-worthy performance, plays the title character, a down-on-his-luck folk singer struggling to break out of the Greenwich Village folk scene of the early '60s after the death of his songwriting partner.
 
Headed into a long, slow tailspin, the self-centered, self-pitying Davis deals with losing a benefactor's cat as well as the possibility that he fathered the impending child of Jean Berkey (Carey Mulligan), who performs in a husband-wife duo with her spouse Jim (Justin Timberlake). He also meets Troy Nelson (Stark Sands), a soldier whose bland version of folk music seems poised to reach a bigger audience than Davis' authentic and soulful work. Davis finally splits town on a dream-like road trip with a dissolute jazz musician (John Goodman) while hoping for a chance to meet folk music impresario Bud Grossman (F. Murray Abraham).
 
It's all beautifully, bleakly shot by cinematographer Bruno Delbonnel and expertly shaped by the Coens, capturing the same melancholic and fatalistic tone of their brilliant A Serious Man, while tapping into the electricity of the music itself. Den Of Geek recently participated in a roundtable discussion of the film with the Coens, who talked about the story's origins, the cast, the music, and that cat.
 
Tell us the genesis of this story.
 
Ethan Coen: We were in the office one day. We just sit around the office doing whatever or talking, which turns into writing at some point, and Joel said, “All right. How about suppose he’s a folk singer and he gets beat up in the alley outside of Gerde’s Folk City in 1961?” Which was like an odd thought. But, you know, that’s what we do when you’re writing. All right, here’s an odd thought. What about this? Does it go anywhere? Maybe. You know, you embroider on each other’s ideas and they go somewhere or don’t. And, in this case, it did.
 
Joel Coen: It didn’t actually for a long time. We sort of put it aside and thought, “Well how does that work? Where does that go?” Then we came back to it at a certain point, a certain time later, and started thinking about it some more and it developed slowly into the movie.
 
How familiar were you in a general sense with the music of the period? Had you listened to it extensively yourselves and then how much more did you go into it once this took on its own life?
 
Ethan: We were familiar in a general sense –- not from listening to it during the period itself because we were small children then. But, you know, when we were kids, we listened to not so much music from that scene as the music that grew out of that scene. I mean, you know, obviously it’s the scene Bob Dylan walked into so his music harks back to that and that’s kind of how we got into it -- by indirection from listening to the music that came out of it. And then, you know, when we knew specifically that we wanted to do this movie, when we were writing the script or finishing the script we did start to listen more purposefully but at that point it was music that we knew more about.
 
Joel: We’d made a movie with T-Bone (Burnett, music supervisor) years ago, O Brother, Where Art Thou? The music in O Brother is very much related to this music. This music came from that music. It’s different in certain ways from that music, but otherwise it’s very similar in certain ways. It was a revival of that music but slanted a certain way and in the folk tradition of reimagining and reinterpretation and rearrangement of music. A lot of those people who were on the scene in 1960-61, the late '50s in the Village were folklorists. They were interested in discovering, recording, playing and learning about that music, specifically the music that was in O Brother, some of it.
 
 
What is the backstory on John Goodman's character?
 
Ethan: Wow. We’re not big on backstory. It’s something actors think about sometimes -- some actors -- and find useful. But, it’s an interesting question because it exposes a complete vacuum in us.
 
Joel: There were certain things when we were thinking about it that we thought would be interesting. We wanted someone who was a musician from the period but not a folk musician. So we thought, well let’s make him a jazz musician. There were a lot of interesting things happening in jazz then. We were vaguely thinking of him as a guy who came out of that sort of post-war bebop movement that was very interesting in New York in the '50s and was happening with jazz but was so different from what the folk people were doing. In certain ways, there was a musical sophistication to it that was also very different from what was happening in the folk scene. But who we thought he was -- I don’t know. John had certain ideas about it and we had certain ideas about it but we didn’t really care as long as it was some kind of counterpoint [to Davis].

 
John has been in so many of your films -- he's kind of your good luck charm.
 
Joel: It is true what you’re saying about John. He’s somebody that we do keep coming back to because he's such an interesting actor and such a great actor but also just because, you know, as we’re writing things we often start to sort of hear John’s voice in them, you know. This was like a real good example of that because we would be writing these speeches and then all of a sudden we go, “Well that’s obviously got to be played by John. He’s kind of the person who can get his mind around it.”
 
Ethan: Somehow he’s an old jazz cat in his soul. It just became obvious it had to be him. He’s some kind of hip that’s not contemporary hip.
 
A lot of the advance publicity has been saying this is loosely based on the life of (folk singer) Dave Van Ronk, and Stark Sands said that his character is kind of loosely based on (folk singer) Tom Paxton. And certainly F. Murray Abraham’s character seems to be a version of [Bob Dylan manager] Albert Grossman. Were the characters that specifically connected to real people for you?
 
Ethan: No -- with the exception of Murray Abraham’s character, which is kind of a reference to Albert Grossman who did have the club in Chicago, The Gate of Horn, and was a big sort of folk impresario and went on to manage Bob Dylan. But no, the other characters were much, especially the main character, much less specific. It would be wrong to say they’re based on anybody. Oscar’s character isn’t based on Dave Van Ronk and nobody who knew Van Ronk, I’m sure, would confuse that character for being Dave.
 
We did give him largely Van Ronk’s repertoire. Oscar does play mostly Dave Van Ronk songs. And there are very specific things that we cribbed from Van Ronk’s memoir, The Mayor of MacDougal Street. Just very specific things for the character like the merchant marine thing. But that’s it. It’s a fictional character and Van Ronk was more of a curmudgeon. He was more like the John Goodman character as a person than he was like Oscar’s character. And that goes for everyone else in the movie. There are sort of specific points of reference but you wouldn’t be able to say that any character except for Murray’s part was based on a real person.
 
Joel: That’s also true of Stark’s character. I mean he plays a Tom Paxton song and Tom Paxton actually was in the army in that period -- just like Oscar’s character, we made him a working class kid from the boroughs like Van Ronk was. That’s the same but, again, Stark’s character is nothing like Tom Paxton beyond that. He’s made up.

 
What are you guys listening to these days? When you guys are out just doing nothing separately, what do you listen to?
 
Joel: Well, as Ethan said recently to someone, we listen to a lot of dead people. Totally dead people.
 
Ethan: I’m sorry. They’ve got to be dead.
 
Joel: It’s not like we know a lot of contemporary music -- by which I mean people who are big with my kid’s age group. I’ve got a 19-year-old, but I don’t know a lot of who he listens to. I just don’t know that music.
 
There’s kind of a folk revival to some extent going on now with acts like Mumford & Sons, the Lumineers and so on. Do you see them as sort of picking up the mantle of the artists that you are referencing in this movie?
 
Joel: Yes. Definitely.
 
Ethan: Yes, I think they see themselves as that, sure.
 
Joel: It’s very interesting. In fact when we were starting to do this my wife said, "It’s interesting that you’re doing this now" -- which was sort of news to me. But she was saying there are a lot of bands out right now that are very directly sort of influenced by that music. Marcus (Mumford) was actually somebody that I did know who, for instance, my kid was really into. And Marcus was very instrumental in the making of the soundtrack along with T-Bone. T-Bone brought him in and he worked on it from the get-go.
 
You can tell that with all the stuff, it really is a continuation of exactly that folk tradition. These really young kids now are taking that music and just doing the same thing that the folk musicians were doing in the early '60s where you listen to this stuff and you run it through your own sensibility and it changes slightly and it becomes something else. There’s a long thread that connects them all.
 
One of you was quoted as saying that the movie didn’t have much of a plot so you threw the cat in to give it a little bit of a narrative.
 
Joel: Yeah. Well it’s kind of true. We did realize at a certain point that this isn’t a plot-driven movie. It’s sort of a slice of life movie -- this brief period of time in this one character’s life. But sometimes just from a narrative point of view you are just looking for things that are going to help you structure it and keep it interesting and also be revealing in some way about other things that are going on and feels natural to it. It’s just a feel thing. At some point that idea came into it, and sometimes those things just prove useful and sometimes they don’t, you know. This one stuck around because it was useful.
 
Can you talk about having Justin Timberlake in the movie?
 
Joel: Justin, I don’t know, he’s like kind of obvious to go to for this kind of movie because he’s a real musician who’s also a real actor. It’s not like there are a lot of them. And we were right in thinking that offering a real musician to do a kind of music that’s totally not what he’s associated with commercially would be appealing to him -- which, in fact, it was. He was actually involved in the music more than just in his performances per se. We did a week of pre-records that amounted to sort of rehearsals and actually he and Marcus were kind of involved in everything. But, yeah, Justin’s great.
 
This is also a real "star-making" type of performance for Oscar Isaac. What did you see in him that said to you this will be Llewyn Davis?
 
Joel: Well, I mean, it really was this bizarre combination. I think I can really safely say that I honestly don’t know anyone else who could have done this part because he’s so musical and yet he’s a brilliant, classically trained actor who could carry the whole movie and be in every scene in the movie. And yet he's also a real musician. When we sent his audition tape of him playing and singing the first time to T-Bone, T-Bone said, "This guy's better than a lot of the studio musicians I work with." He’s the real deal in terms of music. And that was like a huge thing because we thought he was right from a sort of actor point of view and the fact that he was able to do this from a musical point of view was really the key.
 
Inside Llewyn Davis is now playing in select cities and will open in wide release on December 20.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug, Review

$
0
0
ReviewDavid Crow12/12/2013 at 10:56AM

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug will serve as a litmus test for how far down the rabbit hole of Tolkien fandom you're willing to go.

When approaching a nearly three-hour opus like The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, one should have a pretty decent idea going in if this reverent fealty paid to the imagination of J.R.R. Tolkien is for them. Perhaps the ultimate Rorschach inkblot, Peter Jackson’s ponderous Hobbit Trilogy has become the rarest of things: A cinematic litmus test for how far down the rabbit hole of fandom, in this case Tolkien, you’re willing to go.
 
Handsomely mounted and wonderfully acted, Desolation of Smaugshares much in common with its 2012 predecessor, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, in that they are both greatly endured labors of love, albeit for much of the audience they are simply to be endured. At 161 minutes, the second Hobbitis a lot of movie, but for the converted these are happy tidings.
 
Picking up moments after An Unexpected Journey, this Hobbitfinds our wayward band of heroes still led by the grumpy Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage) and slyly cryptic Gandalf the Grey (Ian McKellen) on the road to the Lonely Mountain. Of course, our vantage point truly lies with the titular halfing played ever unpretentiously by the charming Martin Freeman. Still all smiles, save for the flummoxed pangs of terror, Freeman’s Bilbo Baggins captures the everyman quality imbued in the character by Tolkien nearly a century ago and is a joy to watch. Unfortunately, while Desolation of Smaug proves to be the better movie overall, it is less the story of a hobbit now. Indeed, save for an amazing finale and other clever uses of Bilbo’s newfound “precious” ring, he is rather peripheral in a film about the importance of dwarves.


 
For in this movie, it is the dwarves’ quest to reclaim the mines, lands, and gold hidden within the Lonely Mountain from the dragon known as Smaug that dominates the narrative, and it is Thorin’s decisions—and those informed by wise dwarf Balin (Ken Scott)—that dictates the direction of this quest. Even Gandalf relinquishes command early when he is drawn onto “other business” away from the quest, ultimately serving as Lord of the Rings prequel material invented for this film. However that leaves a movie, based on Tolkien’s slender fairy tale about the smallest of creatures, in an awkward spot.
 
The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is a better movie than last year’s forebearer. It wastes less time on exposition (there is not a single dwarf musical number!), and I found myself only scratching my head about the point of the first 30 minutes, as opposed to the full hour of spinning wheels that made up a third of An Unexpected Journey. However, it too suffers from the great heft placed upon its slight source material’s Baggins-sized shoulders; in short, this still ain’t Lord of the Rings.
 
Running at a brisk 275-300 pages (depending on the printing), Tolkien’s original novel is an amusing daydream of children’s literature perfectly captured by a mind not yet troubled about the comings-and-goings of Mordor. Back when the darkness there did in fact sleep, it is not a tale that lends itself to roughly nine hours of movie, but when the “appendixes” from Lord of the Rings and other blockbuster-necessitated subplots are added, this trilogy balloons to the size of Tolkien’s adult-aimed three-volume masterpiece, leaving us with countless, countless scenes of orc decapitation and wizard hang-wringing over the thought of necromancers, dark magic, white orcs, red eyes and other bits of fan service.


 
Which is not to say that adding original material to this tale is a bad idea. Much like Lord of the Rings, Tolkien’s source material is a bit of a spear-fest with barely a feminine presence in sight. However, Jackson and co-screenwriting wife Fran Walsh invent the new character Tauriel, played pleasantly by Evangeline Lilly. While essentially a retread of Liv Tyler’s portrayal of Arwen in Fellowship of the Ring(before she was conscripted to the confines of helplessness in later, more Tolkien-esque installments), she is likewise valiant, brave and refreshingly not a dwarf. Indeed, her banter with the “tallest” dwarf of the heroic company, Kili (Aidan Turner), offers a bit of star-crossed and intentionally bemused “romance,” as well as character development for at least one dwarf in the story. Similarly, the shoehorned return of Legolas (Orlando Bloom) allows the two elves to participate in the much expanded barrel escape sequence from the book, now with orcs. It is actually lively and light-hearted enough to both capture the fun of the literary Hobbitwhile offering some of the spectacle present in the original movie trilogy.
 
However, other additions fare less well. Lake-town, the sleepy canal city at the bottom of the Lonely Mountain, surely acted as the epicenter of the book’s climax, but the men and women who lived there were painted with a brush a shade broader than an Olephant. Nonetheless, in this adaptation, viewers get to know every political allegiance and historical footnote about the culture when Bard the Bowman (Luke Evans) becomes an ideological dissident, and the dwarves the political tools of a corrupt oligarchy. It also becomes increasingly apparent that after five-plus hours with this group…dwarves are not very lovable. They are greedy, selfish little buggers who’s quest, when really “opened up” on film, is little more than a business venture to get rich, the 99 percent be damned. Thorin and the group knowingly push the populace of Lake-town, exemplified by Bard’s angelic family, in danger, just as Thorin rather contemptuously pressures Bilbo in the path of Smaug twice during the film’s third act. And they’re our heroes?
 
And yes, Smaug truly is massive in both scope and CGI-spectacle. As realized by the magic of Weta and Benedict Cumberbatch’s purring voice, he is a wonder to behold. And behold, and behold some more, because like the rest of the special effects sequences in the film, this 30-minute climax of dragon-on-dwarf action is too long by half. Extrapolating this is the repeated intercutting between Smaug’s wrath, Gandalf’s side quest, and orcs (always orcs!) attacking Lake-town. The result is a fireball of a scene that still somehow moves like a sliding glacier, causing even the staggering visual grandeur of Smaug to eventually lose his luster, just like the gold strewn mountain that’s clouded under 3D glasses. By the end of the picture, I found my mind on more pressing matters such as, “Why does a dragon need so much gold, anyways? Is fuel for his dragonfire expensive?” I suppose, much like the rest of the movie, we are merely meant to accept this reptilian Gert Fröbe as he is.


 
But even after an eternity of dragons and orcs, the movie doesn’t really end. While Fellowship of the Ring offered the decisive death of Boromir and Frodo making his choice about disbanding the titular brotherhood, and The Two Towers opted to finish the glorious Battle of Helm’s Deep before taking the plunge into the War for Middle-earth, Jackson’s newest cliffhanger isn’t an ending; it’s a screeching halt in mid-story. With all those endings in Return of the King, surely he could have thrown a denouement The Desolation of Smaug'sway?
 
In 1998 and 1999, Jackson, Walsh, and Philippa Boyens made a series of painful, but savvy choices when adapting Tolkien’s three-headed hydra into a trilogy of films; this included the exorcising of beloved characters like Tom Bombadil and adored sequences like the Scouring of the Shire. For a decade purists have bemoaned these changes. I honestly wonder if the Peter Jackson of 2013 would make the same calculations as the Jackson of 2003, because this feels like the type of adaptation the most ardent diehards wanted: Three hours for every 75 pages. Despite this trilogy’s gargantuan budget, the result is not a series of movies for the mainstream. It is a meeting space in movie houses across the globe for pure-hearted Tolkien enthusiasts. Yet, as someone who read Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit because I was so engrossed by Fellowship of the Ring in 2001, I question whether this eagerly delivered gospel shall ever win over any new converts.
 
Den of Geek Rating: 2.5 out of 5 Stars
 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

Wow. People being chased for 3 hours, by a horde of Orcs. Never saw that coming. /sarcasm

Yes, and I can't wait! :-)

Yeah, uh..............it's --Erebor, The Lonely Mountain-- not "The Misty Mountains". The Misty Mountains are the mountains they emerge from in the previous film.

Haven't seen it, hope I don't have to, but can already tell you, based on seeing the first one, I would agree word for word with this here review!

Thanks for catching that! My Tolkien card is probably on probation for mixing those names in my head.

LoL, no problem

American Hustle Review

$
0
0
ReviewDon Kaye12/12/2013 at 10:56AM

David O. Russell’s fictionalized, kaleidoscopic take on the late ‘70s ABSCAM operation is fueled by a stellar cast and those eye-popping outfits.

American Hustleopens with an extended scene of con artist Irving Rosenfeld (Christian Bale) patiently gluing a toupee onto his bald scalp and then arranging it with the rest of his floppy hair in a comb-over for the ages. The scene is meaningful for two reasons: It’s one of the last times anyone in director David O. Russell’s sometimes madcap, sometimes melancholy satire will exhibit anything resembling patience, and it’s also symbolic of the way that nearly every character in the film hides their true selves, often barely holding their constructed identities together.
 
American Hustle is a heavily fictionalized (“Some of these things actually happened”) account of the FBI’s Abscam sting operation of the late ‘70s and early ‘80s, which ensnared a U.S. senator, six members of the U.S. House of Representatives, a New Jersey state senator and others in a scheme involving a fake Middle Eastern sheikh, government bribes and high-level corruption. The film’s early scenes follow Irving – who’s deceptively smart under that thing on his head, but also oddly genial about the low-level scams he pulls involving fraudulent loans and phony art – as he meets the apparent love of his life and immediate partner in grift, Sydney Prosser (Amy Adams) who catches the marks with a fetching fake British accent and a series of severely plummeting necklines.
 
Irving’s biggest problem at this point is that he also has a wife, Rosalyn (Jennifer Lawrence) who doles out pleasure and pain in equal doses, the latter largely through her unpredictable way with words and frequent accidental attempts to burn down their house. But all that recedes into the background (for a while) when Irving and Sydney are busted by FBI agent Richie DiMaso (Bradley Cooper, his tight curls almost as fabulous as Bale’s hairpiece), who offers them immunity if they help him land a few bigger fish.


 
Those fish start out as other con men, but the trail soon leads our unlikely trio into a larger, more dangerous world of sleaze and shady activities involving state and federal government officials, local New Jersey powerbrokers and the mafia (embodied like no one else can by a cameo star). DiMaso sees the operation as his path to Bureau glory; Sydney and Rosalyn, who ends up getting unwittingly involved as well, see it as a way out of their dead-end lives; and Irving sees it at first as a simple means to get back to the life he enjoyed, but is soon the only one who realizes that things are spinning out of control.
 
Almost every character in American Hustle is in over their heads, which makes the outlandish ‘70s hairstyles they all employ throughout so rich in symbolism. The culture then was in the early stages of “me, me, me” and “more, more, more” (which we’re seeing the even uglier ramifications of nowadays), and everything from Sydney’s sex-bomb outfits to Richie’s stratospheric demands and near-psychotic behavior (he beats his own boss with a phone at one point) are indicative of the almost desperate grasp of materialism that dominated the era. And no one, save except perhaps for Irv as a scam artist turned sorta-hero, ever stops to reflect on what they’re doing.
 
By rewriting Eric Warren Singer’s script to replace the real-life figures with fictional versions – also an apt commentary on the characters’ constant reinvention of themselves – Russell simultaneously liberates the material while diluting it. Above all, American Hustle is fun. Every single actor has a blast; the women look sensational, and the costumes and period details are a riot. But by taking it out of the real world, so to speak, Russell lessens the power of what ultimately happened as a result of Abscam: The further disillusionment with our own government just a few years after Watergate and the tragedy of ruined lives (the latter touched upon by Jeremy Renner’s well-intentioned but hapless mayor of Camden, Carmine Polito).


 
That’s the biggest difference between American Hustleand, say,Goodfellas, a film which Russell clearly aspires to have his movie sit alongside. Not everything is played for laughs in Scorsese’s classic—certainly not its abrupt, still shocking explosions of violence and death. But just about everything in American Hustleis. That doesn’t necessarily make it a lesser film, but leaves a slight air of uncertainty over it. Does the director have something to say about all this or is he just having fun with a grand bunch of brilliantly realized characters? You may not come out of American Hustle with the same feeling of awe that you had walking out of Goodfellasor even Boogie Nights, because it doesn’t plumb quite the same emotional depths, and because we’ve seen those films already make a lot of the same moves that Russell makes here (including a non-stop, exhilarating stream of period pop music cues).
 
But even with that, American Hustle is sharply written, endlessly energetic, flawlessly edited, and perfectly acted, with Bale wringing much more humanity out of Irving than you might expect, Adams (the real gem here despite more showy turns from her co-stars) gliding from mysterious and seductive to desperate and frightened, and Lawrence creating suspense every time she opens her mouth to utter some new nonsense. Russell commands the whole thing with confidence and marvelous timing, even if he keeps a slight distance. Perhaps the biggest American hustle of all is that we never really know who people are or what their true intentions might be…and that speaks as much to the subjects of this nearly great filmas it does to the filmmaker himself.
 
Den Of Geek Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
8

First Pictures of Johnny Depp From Transcendence Here

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/12/2013 at 1:21PM

See Johnny Depp in the new sci-fi thriller from The Dark Knight and Inception's Wally Pfister.

In what is shaping up to be another one of the most interesting movies of 2014, Transcendence remains still a bit of a mystery box. Directed by Wally Pfister, longtime cinematographer for Christopher Nolan, and starring Johnny Depp, Rebecca Hall, Kate Mara, Morgan Freeman, Paul Bettany, and Cillian Murphy, not much is yet known about this April release.
 
Yet, Warner Bros. has finally decided to whet our appetites (via EW) with these new images from the upcoming science fiction spring spectacle:
 


 
Vaguely the story about a scientist (Depp) who is searching for the “singularity point” for when artificial intelligence surpasses its human counterpoint, this is the tale of a man who is literally absorbed by the technology into becoming a ghost in the software. With the above released pictures, Pfister also shed some more light on this out-there concept.
 
“It’s a very timely subject as we find we have to update the software on our cell phones before we can even make a call,” Pfister said. Also, he concedes that this is the most “normal” Depp has likely appeared in a movie for sometime!
 
Transcendence begins April 18, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Elysium Contest: Win a Free Blu-ray, T-Shirt and Mobile Wallet

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/12/2013 at 2:19PM

With the DVD release of Elysium almost here, we're giving away a free Blu-ray/DVD combo, T-shirt and mobile phone wallet to the most creative and furturistic of contestants!

There is no denying that after District 9, Neill Blomkamp became one of the go-to names in science fiction. By crafting movies that are both high on spectacle and heady subtext, he gives his audiences more than just a passing entertainment. And now with the Elysium Blu-ray and DVD release on December 17, we all have the chance to revisit and relearn the truth of Elysium when Max (Mat Damon) must escape hellacious LA circa 2154 to travel to the elitist space station Elysium, where there may be hope for mankind.
 
But we have hope right here today as we’re giving away a free ElysiumBlu-ray/DVD Combo pack, a mobile phone wallet and a T-shirt in celebration of the movie.



 
Given the movie’s heavy use of robots, we thought it would be best for the winner to get into the mindset of a resident of Elysium. Here's what you have to do...follow us on Twitter over at @DenofGeekUS OR like us on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/DenOfGeekUS) and post your favorite robot on our wall, and you must use #elysium in your post! So what are you wait fo' Mr. Roboto? Find your inner-Chappie!


The contest ends at noon EST on Monday, December 16th. We'll announce the winners on Twitter and Facebook that afternoon!

 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

My favorite robot is "Maximilian" from The Black Hole. #Elysium Always wanted to have a die-cast of Max for my home.

R2-D2, most hilarious as it should be

I follow you on twitter

My favorite robot is Sonny (I-Robot) #Elysium

willgriesmer@yahoo.com

Joe Wright’s Pan Coming June 2015

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/12/2013 at 2:26PM

The Peter Pan reimagining from Hanna's Joe Wright has been slated for the heart of the dizzying tentpole feast that is summer 2015.

And the madhouse competition for tentpoles in summer 2015 continues to escalate into dizzying degrees. Warner Brothers, which already has Batman vs. Superman (or whatever it’s called), Mad Max: Fury Road and San Andreas 3D slated for that summer, has announced another release: Pan.
 
That’s right, not to be confused with this year’s Once Upon a Time, WB is releasing a new take on the Peter Pan story as originally dreamed by J.M. Barrie in which a darker turn is made. With Joe Wright (Atonement, Hanna) already onboard to direct, the project has already attempted to entice Javier Bardem to make port in the budding new franchise as the villainous Blackbeard, though he has since passed on the role. However, that has not stopped WB from pressing forward on scheduling Panfor June 26, 2013.
 
Working from a screenplay by Jason Fuchs, this origin tale reimagines the coming of permanent age for Peter Pan when he is taken as an orphan from England into the magical world of Neverland, where he will lead the natives as a savior against the dreaded pirates.
 
The film will be in 3D.
 
SOURCE: Deadline
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Warner Archive Launches Instant App for Rare Movies

$
0
0
NewsTony Sokol12/12/2013 at 2:27PM

In the mood for a rare classic? Warner Archive Instant have got an app for that...

Okay, you’re in the mood for a Bogart movie, but not Casablanca, you’ve seen that dozens of times, you want Isle of Fury or The Return of Dr. X. They’re not on Netflix. What are you gonna do? Warner Bros., which probably made the movie you were looking for anyway, announced a new streaming service specifically designed to help you find those elusive classic films.

Warner Bros. Home Entertainment launched a new subscription streaming service for classic movie and TV connoisseurs as an iPad™ app for iOS 6 and 7. The studio recently launched Warner Archive Instant, which you get for free for two weeks when you sign up for it.

Rare classic films and TV shows from the biggest entertainment library in the world will come streaming at you in 1080p HD. After the free trial, subscriptions are $9.99 a month. Warner Archive Instant is also available on Roku, PCs and Macs.

Justin Herz, Senior Vice President, Direct-to-Consumer, Warner Bros. Digital Distribution & General Manager, Warner Bros. Advanced Digital Services said  “We’re very excited to roll out an iPad app for Warner Archive Instant as we also continue to grow the service on Roku, our first viewing platform. Both give consumers an exceptional HD viewing experience and will pave the way for broader device expansion throughout the next year. The new Warner Archive Instant iPad app is another step forward in our continued efforts to make the Warner Bros. library of rare, classic content available to consumers.”

Warner Archive Instant has hundreds of movies available from every period throughout Hollywood history. They have silent movies, movies made before the code, art house classics and B westerns. Besides movies from Warner Brothers, you can also stream films from MGM, RKO, New Line, Monogram, Allied Artists, Lorimar and other studios.

If you can’t find it, maybe it’s not worth watching. Well, that can’t be true. But chances are it’s in there.

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Sony Announces New Brain Trust for Venom and Sinister Six Spin-Offs

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/13/2013 at 3:16PM

Sony Pictures drops the bombshell that they're launching Venom and Sinister Six spin-off franchises.

When Sony Pictures Co-Chairman Amy Pascal told investors last month that Sony was looking to “access Marvel’s full world of Spider-Man characters,” she wasn’t kidding.
 
In a bold announcement that seeks to “forge a new legacy for Peter Parker” on the big screen, Sony has announced both Venom and Sinister Six spin-off movies, as well as a new franchise “brain trust” that will make it happen.
 
To be more specific, each spin-off, separate from the forthcoming The Amazing Spider-Man 3 and The Amazing Spider-Man 4, in 2016 and 2018 respectively, will be two new potential franchises each potentially birthed by Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci and Drew Goddard, respectively.
 
Set up as a “brain trust” by the studio with longtime Spider-Man producers Avi Arad and Matt Tolmach, as well as Jeff Pinkner, Ed Solomon, and Amazing Spider-Man helmer Marc Webb, Kurtzman and Orci, who wrote a draft of The Amazing Spider-Man 2 and also penned both of J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek films, several of the Transformers movies, and are co-creators of Fox’s new hit Sleepy Hollow, will write the screenplay for Venom along with Solomon. Kurtzman is also set to direct that film, which presumably would center on the symbiote-cloaked baddie who was originally written to be a Spider-Man doppleganger in the comics and is often aliased as Eddie Brock. Additionally, Goddard is intended to direct a Sinister Six film, which would certainly give him a foot in multiple Marvel movie universes, as he is also the current executive producer, showrunner and pilot director of Netflix’s new Daredevil series that is tied into Marvel/Disney’s Marvel Studios franchise. However, if anyone can manage six disparate villains fighting amongst themselves, it is likely the man who co-scripted and directed Cabin in the Woods. Also worth noting is that Goddard is a colleague of Joss Whedon going all the way back to Buffy the Vampire Slayer.


 
Doug Belgrad, president of Columbia Pictures, said in a press statement, “The Spider-Man film franchise is one of our studio's greatest assets. We are thrilled with the creative team we have assembled to delve more deeply into the world that Marc, Avi and Matt have begun to explore in TheAmazing Spider-Man and The Amazing Spider-Man 2. We believe that Marc, Alex, and Drew have uniquely exciting visions for how to expand the Spider-Man universe in each of these upcoming films.”
 
For any fan, geek or Spider-Man enthusiast, this is rather stunning news. Obviously, Sony seeks to build their own Marvel Cinematic Universe through the villains. And if one is to do that, it makes the most sense to use the Spider-Man rogues gallery, which is arguably the deepest and most fascinating in all of comicdom. Plus, there is a whole backlog that could expand it further: Black Cat seems like an obvious candidate for a spin-off, as well as characters like Silver Sable and Scarlet Spider for that matter (who says Ben Reilly has to be a clone)? Most intriguing is the prospect of a villain based team-up film. Would they be the “protagonists” of the story? Would Spider-Man be featured or would it be the dastardly baddies versus law enforcement or an even greater evil than their own sinister standards? For that matter who would be in the Sinister Six besides the obvious applicants in Rhino (Paul Giamatti) and Electro (Jamie Foxx)? Obviously, with the casting of Colm Feore as Adrian Toomes for The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Vulture is an obvious candidate. Indeed, he and Doc Ock are heavily hinted at already existing in the new canon as seen in The Amazing Spider-Man 2trailer.
 
There is much to be gleamed here for fans to consider. How about yourself? Do you like the idea of Venom and Sinister Six spin-off movies? Who else from the Spidey mythos may deserve their own movie?
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>