Quantcast
Channel: Movies – Den of Geek
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live

Despicable Me 3 and How the Grinch Stole Christmas Slated for 2017

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/15/2014 at 5:44PM
Despicable Me 2

Universal announced animation slate for 2017, which includes Despicable Me 3 and a new How the Grinch Stole Christmas movie.

Universal is not ready to say goodbye to those adorable little minions, who will be returning (along with Gru and the girls if you’re interested) in June 2017 for part of what looks to be a strong year for Universal and new kid on the block animation powerhouse, Illumination Entertainment.
 
After Despicable Me 2 pulled in a whopping $935.1 million worldwide in 2013 (and it’s only now opening in China), which made it the most successful animated film of the year, Universal is preparing for more in Despicable Me 3slated for June 30, 2017.
 
However, they are not done there, as Universal and Illumination are also proudly announcing a new animated version of Dr. Seuss’ How The Grinch Stole Christmas with a November 17, 2017 release date slapped on. That film would likely have big shoes to fill in the shadow of Chuck Jones’ hand-drawn classic from 1966, which also featured the amazing vocal narration of Boris Karloff. However, there is the little matter of the 2000 misfire starring Jim Carrey, which gives any future effort plenty of leeway.
 
The studios also announced an untitled Illumination film dated for December 21, 2016. That marks several special holidays for Universal and Illumination in the coming years.
 
SOURCE: Deadline
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Sam Worthington and Zoe Saldana confirmed for Avatar sequels

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew1/15/2014 at 7:06AM

James Cameron confirms that Sam Worthington and Zoe Saldana are set for his next three Avatar films...

Things are beginning to get moving again where the Avatar sequels are concerned. Not that they haven't been, of course, with James Cameron and his team working on the scripts and pre-production. But physical production is getting closer, and Cameron has confirmed two expected pieces of casting.

Basically, both Sam Worthington and Zoe Saldana have signed up to reprise their roles from the original movie in the upcoming sequels. Specifically, they've signed up for all three - Avatar 2, Avatar 3 and Avatar 4. The first of those is due in cinemas in December 2016.

No further casting has been announced thus far. But expect details to start filtering through soon, we'd wager.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


The top 25 underappreciated films of 2005

$
0
0
Odd ListRyan Lambie1/16/2014 at 8:11AM

Another 25 unsung greats come under the spotlight, as we provide our pick of the underappreciated films of 2005...

It's underappreciated films time again, and this week, we delve deep into the year 2005 - a collection of months dominated by the likes of Star Wars: Episode III, another Harry Potter, Steven Spielberg's War Of The Worlds, Peter Jackson's King Kong, and CG family movie Madagascar.

It was also the year Pierce Brosnan formally bowed out of his role as James Bond, and Martin Scorsese's The Aviator was hyped to win the director his first Oscar, but didn't. Still, the contents of this list received nothing like the acclaim of The Aviator, nor the financial pickings of a Star Wars or Harry Potter. As ever, we've focused on 25 films which we think deserve a bit more love.

So with apologies to the likes of Joss Whedon's Serenity (which we came to the conclusion was simply too much of a fan favorite to qualify, even though we do really like it - our lookback at the movie is here) here's our selection of 2005's underappreciated films, starting with a little-seen drama from Withnail himself, Richard E Grant...

25. Wah Wah

Richard E Grant put together quite the package with his directorial debut, Wah-Wah. Not only did he produce a diverting drama based on his own childhood, but the accompanying book - The Wah Wah Diaries - is a riveting account of trying to get a low budget movie made.

Set during the final days of the British Empire in 1960s Africa, the movie was shot in Swaziland, and boasts an excellent cast, including Gabriel Byrne, Emily Watson and Julie Walters. It's a very human movie this one, as a family slowly struggles against the backdrop of political change. And there's a sense that Grant very much put everything into it.

24. Red Eye

Wes Craven stepped outside the horror genre for this Hitchcockian thriller, which stars Rachel McAdams as a career-minded young woman who's terrorised by Cillian Murphy's handsome psycho during an overnight flight to Miami. The reasons for the villain's threats are tantalisingly slow to come to light, and Murphy is perfectly cold-eyed and menacing in the role.

McAdams is equally good, and her cunning and resolve (not to mention some good writing on the part of Carl Ellsworth)  transforms what could have been a stock woman-in-peril character. Although Red Eye really picks up its pace in the final act, it's here that the movie becomes less interesting, as the simmering tension gives way to action. But Craven directs with a sure hand throughout, and brings a lightness of touch, too - look out for Jayma Mays in a great supporting role as a timid yet relentlessly upbeat hotel worker.

23. Unleashed

Three years after he made the thunderous Statham vehicle The Transporter, director Louis Leterrier directed this Jet Li martial arts flick, again under the banner of Luc Besson’s production company, EuropaCorp. The late, sorely-missed Bob Hoskins stars as a villain who keeps Jet Li’s sad-eyed orphan chained up as his personal attack dog. Although ferocious in battle, Li’s Danny the Dog is actually a gentle soul beneath the blur of fists and feet.

Escaping the clutches of his master, Danny finds refuge with Morgan Freeman’s blind piano tuner and his stepdaughter, played by Kerry Condon. The rest of the movie sees Danny getting into the kinds of fights you’d expect in a Jet Li movie, while also finding out about his obscure origins. The result is an action movie with a touch of human warmth and more than a little acting heft thanks to Hoskins and Freeman.

Despite good reviews (Roger Ebert looked on it favourably) Unleashed only made a little more than it cost to make on its cinematic run. Track a copy down, and you’ll find an underrated genre movie that satisfies in terms of drama as well as high-kicking action.

22. Hard Candy

A very, very hard movie to actually like this one, but it's not without real impact. It marked the breakthrough performance for Ellen Page, playing a 14-year old who crosses paths with Patrick Wilson's suspected paedophile.

The less you know about the movie the better in truth, for this is psychological horror that works best cold. Page's performance is quite brilliant, and marked her early as a talent to watch, and it's arguably director David Slade's best movie to date. It's 104 minutes of cold movie theater with quite a punch to it.

21. Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy

A relatively large-budget adaptation of Douglas Adams' quintessentially British Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy was never going to please everyone, but all things considered, we can't help feeling that the resulting movie was a successful one. It's not without its awkward moments, granted, but for every bump and bemusing storytelling choice there's arguably a sparkling comedy moment or an inspired bit of casting.

Martin Freeman is perfect for the role of the affable Arthur Dent, who goes on an intergalactic adventure after the Vogons decide to blow up planet Earth. Then there's Bill Nighy as Slartibartfast, Stephen Fry's sonorous voice as The Guide, and Alan Rickman providing perfectly modulated gloom as Marvin the Paranoid Android. For all its flaws, this was a fitting and, we'd say, underrated tribute to Adams, who co-wrote, and sadly died shortly before production. It's merely a shame that more of the author's books weren't also given the same treatment.

20. Kinky shoes

A comedy drama about the Northamptonshire shoe industry might not sound like much of an evening’s entertainment, but there’s far more to director Julian Jarrold’s story than the premise suggests. Joel Edgerton, adopting a surprisingly good British accent, who plays the inheritor of an ailing shoe factory who’s struggling to prevent his family business from going to the wall. During a trip to London, the factory owner meets sassy cross-dressing stage performer Lola (Chiwetel Ejiofor), who gives him the idea of creating shoes for the fetishwear market.

Criticisms that Kinky shoes sticks too slavishly to the rom-com format aren’t too wide of the mark, but what makes the movie worth seeing is the quality of its acting. Edgerton’s a solid lead, but Ejiofor is magnificent as Lola, and quickly emerges as the movie’s sympathetic and extremely funny dramatic center. If the actor’s recent work in 12 Years A Slave has left you hunting through his earlier films, you could do a lot worse than check out this overlooked Britcom.

19. The Upside Of Anger

Kevin Costner may have left his full-on movie star days behind him by the time he took on Mike Binder's The Upside Of Anger, but his role here is just the kind of character he excels at. He's paired with the always-excellent Joan Allen, but whilst the movie has been broadly classed as a romantic comedy, it's got more of a tinge of a grown-up drama about it.

It's a very good one too. It's perhaps understandable given its relatively quiet approach that it didn't set the box office alight, but there's a good, enjoyable drama waiting to be discovered for those that seek The Upside Of Anger out. It's continued proof that even when he slipped off many people's radar, Costner's laser-eye for a good script remains unaltered.

18. In Her Shoes

The DVD cover for In Her Shoes makes this look like just another throwaway romantic comedy. But look closer: this one's directed by Curtis Hanson - of L.A. Confidential and Wonder Boys fame - and that should instantly tell you that there's a lot more going on here.

It's based on Jennifer Weinger's novel, and sees Cameron Diaz and Toni Collette as sisters, with Shirley MacLaine as their grandmother. Appreciating that it tonally falters a little, never quite deciding how dark it wants to go, there's still plenty to like, admire and warm to when it comes to In Her Shoes. The trio of lead performances is strong, and it's a rare high-ish profile movie to bother to delve into the relationship between very different sisters. Worth a look.

17. Brick

The limited movie theater release for this indie thriller was such that, although Brick more than made its money back, it still made a relatively small $3.9m at the US box office. Cleverly relocating the trappings of a typical hardboiled detective story to a Californian high school, Brick stars Joseph Gordon-Levitt as a student attempting to find out who murdered his ex-girlfriend.

Writer and director Rian Johnson captures the terse dialogue of noir fiction perfectly, and Gordon-Levitt is ideally cast as the hard-bitten lead, but then, the rest of the cast’s great, too - there’s Nora Zehetner as a femme fatale, and Lukas Haas as an unlikely drug baron. Expertly merging the staples of the American high-school movie with detective fiction, Brick is a one-of-a-kind thriller, and a cracking debut for Rian Johnson.

16. The Skeleton Key

A far better thriller, with a far more interesting final act, than you may be expecting here. It's from director Iain Softley, of Hackers, K-PAX and Backbeat vintage, and on paper it's just another story about an old house that's got something of a past to it. In fact, more than on paper: that's just how it comes across for some time.

Softley's cast do him good service here, with Kate Hudson, John Hurt and Peter Sarsgaard. And without its ending The Skeleton Key still has plenty about it to recommend it. But with it? It lifts itself into the kind of movie that very much doesn't let you down at the final proverbial hurdle.

15. The Notorious Bettie Page

Some of the best biopics partly work because they take you into a world you know very little about. Others work because the central performance is so strong. In the case of The Notorious Bettie Page, both ingredients are active, even if the movie itself is a bit bumpy.

Bettie Page was a pin-up erotica model of the 1950s, and the notoriety that came from that would in large part define her career. Gretchen Mol brings her very much to life on the screen, and it's a tough life too. Mary Harron, who previously helmed American Psycho, mixes in a somber look at the impact of pornography (more successfully than the recent Lovelace) as well. But it's Mol who remains the main reason to see the movie. She's never been better.

14. Thank You For Smoking

It's frightening to think how good the boxset of Jason Reitman's work is going to be once he comes to the end of his directorial career. Juno is the movie for which he's most noted, but just look at Young Adult, Labor Day and Up In The Air for a demonstration of range and talent.

Also, check out the movie that arguably put him on the map. Thank You For Smoking is Reitman's first full-length feature, and it's got an edge to it that's in some way defined his movie theater since. Mixing satire and drama, Aaron Eckhardt stars as a lobbyist for tobacco companies in a movie dripping with wit, and let down a little by how much work it's trying to do. It's not Reitman's best movie, certainly, but Thank You For Smoking is still a very good one, It's smart too, and played strongly by its impressive cast. And: nobody smokes a cigarette in it, ever. That's the kind of trivia that wins bar quizzes, friends...

13. The Jacket

This science fiction drama isn't without its flaws, but we'd argue that critics were a little harsh to The Jacket when it appeared just under a decade ago. Playing out vaguely like a low-key mix of Twelve Monkeys and Ken Russell's bonkers Altered States, The Jacket's about Gulf War veteran Jack (Adrien Brody) who finds that, while secured in a straightjacket in a mental institution, he can project his consciousness forward in time.

In the future, the ex-soldier meets a woman named Jackie (Keira Knightley) whose fate is bound up with a sad event in the former's past. Director John Maybury's movie flits between the years 1993 (where Jack's in the institution) and the year 2007, where Jack gradually changes Jackie's life for the better.

The story's a simple one, and doesn't exactly build to an earth-shattering conclusion, but until then, The Jacket engages with its moving drama, quality of acting, and some arrestingly chilly visuals. The result isn't the best time-travel movie ever made, but one that is nevertheless strongly recommended.

12. A Cock And Bull Story

A movie-within-a-movie about a doomed attempt to adapt the novel Tristram Shandy for the screen, A Cock And Bull Story stars Steve Coogan and Rob Brydon, who play the same heightened versions of themselves we'd see in TV's The Trip a few years later (also directed by the prolific Michael Winterbottom). Coogan and Brydon gamely snipe at one another over their roles in the movie, their previous work  (Coogan's Alan Patridge is a common point of reference, understandably) and their physical attributes.

Featuring a remarkable supporting cast, including Keeley Hawes, Gillian Anderson, Stephen Fry and future Miss Moneypenny, Naomie Harris, it's certainly the starriest British movie of 2005, and quite possibly the funniest, too. Although the reviews for A Cock And Bull Story were extremely positive, it was somewhat outgunned by the year's big releases (in the US, it just about scraped $1.2m according to Box Office Mojo) - so if you've never seen it before, A Cock And Bull Story is well worth rediscovering.

11. The Squid And The Whale

Writer and director Noah Baumbach brings humor and a lightness of touch to a potentially melancholy drama about a couple's divorce and its effects on their two children. Jeff Daniels and Laura Linney are outstanding as the fractured couple, but Jesse Eisenberg and Owen Kline are better still as their offspring whose anxiety over the coming break-up manifests itself in different ways. Eisenberg's sensitive teenager Walt fools parents and teachers into thinking he's written a Pink Floyd song, while Kline's adolescent Frank turns to alcohol and acts of frantic self-pollution in the school library.

There's no shortage of New York-based middle-class dramas set in New York, but The Squid And The Whale is one of the best. Written with honesty and intelligence, and brilliantly acted, it remains one of Baumbach's very best films.

10. Zathura

We've talked about Jon Favreau's excellent Zathura: A Space Adventure a few times before at Den Of Geek, and suspect we'll talk about it a few times again. For it's a movie that proves you can stretch a relatively modest budget very, very far. And as a spiritual sequel to Jumanji (both are based on books from the same author, Chris Van Allsburg), it blasts that movie clean out of the sky.

It's easy to classify Zathura as Jumanji in space, and there's certainly a strong element of that. But it all gels so much better. The young cast, including Josh Hutcherson, Jonah Bobo and Kristen Stewart, are uniformly strong, and there's a welcome, important small role for Tim Robbins too. Favreau proves he can handle effects work on a tight budget, and it's intelligent, entertaining movie theater for a younger audience that he delivers. Naturally therefore, the movie bombed. Sigh.

9. The Matador

Pierce Brosnan took on a few projects in the aftermath of his departure from the James Bond role, but none of them could top his choice of The Matador. It's one of his best roles this, playing a not particularly enthusiastic assassin by the name of Julian Noble. He meets Greg Kinnear's travelling salesman, and writer-director Richard Shepard (who most recently made Dom Hemingway, starring Jude Law) fashions a dark, interesting comedy that richly rewards repeated viewing. It helps it's willing to take a few chances along the way too.

8. Junebug

Kevin Smith once wrote a piece on Junebug, calling it the movie that "reminded me why I got into movie in the first place". Because this was, certainly back in 2005, the kind of movie that independent movie theater wasn't making so much. Since then? Offbeat family dramas of this ilk have become a lot more prevalent.

Still, there are many reasons still to seek Junebug out. The high profile one is the breakthrough role it gave to Amy Adams, as the relentlessly upbeat, heavily pregnant Ashley. It'd be wrong to overlook Embeth Davidtz though, as a gallery owner meeting her new in-laws.

Never overly showy, and with director Phil Morrison keeping his focus exactly where the movie needs to be, Junebug is a delightful movie, that doesn't rush itself, and allows a series of characters to be developed and explored properly. A real treat of a movie.

7. The Proposition

Australia's John Hillcoat specialises in his own brand of low-key and gritty films where you can almost taste the dust in the air, whether it's the 2012 moonshine drama Lawless or the apocalyptic Cormac McCarthy adaptation The Road. But neither of those films contains quite as much grit and dust as Hillcoat's 2005 Outback western, The Proposition.

The proposition of the title is a deal made between Ray Winstone's Captain Stanley and infamous outlaw Charlie Burns (Guy Pearce): the captain frees Burns from jail on the proviso that he tracks down and kills his sociopathic younger brother, Arthur Burns (Danny Huston). If he does, then his mentally enfeebled younger brother Mikey (Richard Wilson) will be spared from a trip to the gallows.

What follows is a grim and violent tale of double-crosses and retribution, as Charlie heads off on a Heart Of Darkness-like journey into the wilds of Australia, where even characters with the kindly face of John Hurt aren't necessarily to be trusted. There's a bitter streak of nihilism in Nick Cave's script, matched perfectly by the terse performances of Winstone and Pearce, and the story touches on the dark side of Australia's 19th century history.  

6. Sky High

Here's a thought: had the brilliant Sky High been made now, would it be a big hit? Because when it was released back in 2005, it made some impact, but not very much in the scheme of things. And what a pity that is, because this is the best, most loving riff on the superhero genre this side of The Incredibles.

It's a movie set in a world where superheroes are widely known and accepted by society, cenetring more specifically on Sky High, a sort of Hogwarts for heroes, except set in the clouds. Michael Angarano is the proverbial kid that doesn't fit in though, unsure if he has powers of his own, in a school where everyone around him clearly does.

It's a nice new approach for exploring a degree of loneliness, and it doesn't help Angarano's character that his dad - played by Kurt Russell (who is, clearly, brilliant) - is The Commander.

All of this adds up to a layer of substance, which then leaves lots and lots of room for comedy and fun. Because, bluntly, Sky High is an absolute hoot, a gleefully funny, very enjoyable superhero movie that never fully found the audience it so clearly deserved. It has problems, certainly, but if you don't get to the end with a huge smile on your face, then we'd be really surprised.

5. A History Of Violence

This David Cronenberg crime thriller won a plethora of awards and did reasonable business in 2005, so what makes it underrated? For us, it's Viggo Mortensen's performance in the lead role of the outwardly calm, even-tempered small-town restaurant owner Tom orchestra seat. William Hurt was nominated for an Academy Award for his supporting role as crime boss Richie, yet Mortensen didn't get so much as a mention.

When two criminal low-lifes attempt to rob Tom's restaurant, the latter leaps into action and kills his attackers with lightning speed. Hailed as a local hero on television, Tom receives a visit from an even shadier group of organised criminals (among them a particularly menacing Ed Harris) who claim that Tom isn't really Tom, but an Irish gangster from Philadelphia. As Ed Harris and his goons continue to loiter around Tom's restaurant and family home, his wife Edie (Maria Bello) begins to wonder whether there might be a grain of truth in the villains' claims.

David Cronenberg's direction of Josh Olsen's script (loosely based on a graphic novel of the same name) is economical and all the more effective because of its light and shade. The movie opens with an almost silent sequence involving a pair of criminals and a motel, which builds up to a startling jab of horror. It's a rhythm which continues throughout the movie, matching Mortensen's stunning turn: beneath his steady demeanour hides a reservoir of carefully-suppressed aggression.

Mortensen would later earn an Oscar nomination for his next Cronenberg collaboration, Eastern Promises, in which he played a Russian gangster. That, too, was a great performance, but for our money, A History Of Violence edges it for complexity and sheer subtlety.

4. Broken Flowers

It was 2003's Lost In Translation that earned Bill Murray a lot of acclaim and an Oscar nomination. We'd argue that his superb turn in Jim Jarmusch's Broken Flowers was equally as strong too, and if anything, the movie around him is even better as well.

Here, Murray plays a withdrawn, quiet man, who receives an anonymous mail from a woman in his past. Said mail informs him that he has a son who might just be looking for him. Thus, Murray's character begins a journey as he tracks down his former partners to try and get to the bottom of things. As a consequence, he has to face up to much of his past, and that's as much as we're going to tell you.

Broken Flowers is a wonderful movie. It's also one of the most accessible films that Jim Jarmusch has made to date, patiently, slowly revealing more and more. And Murray is quite, quite brilliant as well, with his low key performance perfectly fitting, and lifting, the movie.

3. The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada

Considering the western is a genre oft-written off as consigned to movie theater's past, the 2000s weren't short of some decent ones. Perhaps the best of the decade, competing with Kevin Costner's Open Range for the honor, is The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada, a superb piece of movie theater with a title that gives you a pretty literal outline of the movie's foundations. But there's a promise to Melquaiades that needs keeping, to bury him in his home town, yet circumstances keep preventing that from happening.

The movie's to date the sole big screen directorial effort of Tommy Lee Jones (although he's helmed a couple of TV movies, and has The Homesman in mail-production for release later this year), and his reportedly demanding style pays real dividends here. It's the kind of movie that tends to come either from a fearless first time director or an experienced helmer towards the end of their career. With a love of Sam Peckinpah seemingly threaded throughout, it's at times unpredictable, and utterly compelling. The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada comes very, very highly recommended.

2. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang

For Shane Black, who'd been out of the Hollywood game since the late 90s, Kiss Kiss Bang Bang would ultimately bring its own reward, as it inadvertently led to his appointment as the director of last year's hugely successful Iron Man 3. But in 2005, the comedy thriller was something of a gamble for Black, one of the most highly-paid screenwriters of the 80s and 90s. Quirky and occasionally violent, it's a fusion of Black's own slick humor, all bickering dialogue and one-liners, and the hardboiled detective novels he clearly loves.

Robert Downey Jr, who was himself just coming out of a difficult patch in his career, stars as Harry Lockhart, a shambling actor who pairs with Val Kilmer's private investigator in order to research a potential movie role. Together, they're drawn into a complex and unpredictable murder case which takes in Michelle Monahan, a severed finger and a hungry dog.

It's a rambling, sharp and very funny movie, full of digressions and bewildering turns of events, and Black's laid-back direction and the sparky performances make it entertaining from beginning to end. A limited theatrical release meant that Kiss Kiss Bang Bang barely made its money back in 2005, but it's a movie which deserves to be remembered as a cult classic. With a hit like Iron Man 3 under his belt, we're hoping Black gets to make more films like this one very soon.

1. Lord Of War

His showier, crazier roles aside, Nic Cage is also capable of restrained, intelligent performances, and Lord Of War provided the perfect showcase for this side of his talents. Cage plays the morally bankrupt weapons dealer Yuri Orlov, who makes a fortune from selling munitions to third world countries. Bridget Moynahan plays his wife, who's blissfully unaware of the source of her husband's wealth, while Ethan Hawke plays an agent intent on bringing him to justice.

Impeccably researched and brilliantly directed by Andrew Niccol (who also wrote the screenplay) Lord Of War is utterly engrossing from beginning to end, and its story is all the more troubling for its basis in reality. As Yuri puts it at the start of the movie, "There are over 550 million firearms in worldwide circulation. That's one firearm for every twelve people on the planet. The only question is: How do we arm the other 11?"

Cage's narration is sharp and cuttingly amusing, contrasting perfectly with his character's increasing ambivalence over his chosen line of work. It's a powerful, thought-provoking movie, and while its subject matter didn't exactly endear Lord Of War to a mass audience, it deserves to be seen. Providing a rare insight into a troubling industry, Lord Of War is, for us, among the most powerful films of 2005.

See also:

The top 25 underappreciated films of 2000

The top 25 underappreciated films of 2001

The top 30 underappreciated films of 2002

The top 25 underappreciated films of 2003

The top 25 underappreciated films of 2004

The 250 underappreciated films of the 1990s

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

"The late, sorely-missed Bob Hoskins..." DAMN YOU LOUSY RESEARCHER!!! You're lack of research gave me a heart attack, and you are wrong. Bob Hoskins retired from acting in 2012 due to Parkinsons disease, but he is still alive. Noob.

Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy is fucking HORRIBLE. I rather watch the low budget 80's BBC TV. It's underappreciated for good reason

Microsoft confirms no current plans for a Halo movie

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew1/16/2014 at 8:16AM

Following a rumor that Ridley Scott was involved in a Halo movie project, Microsoft has confirmed a film isn't on the agenda right now...

On the pile of intriguing videogame movie adaptations that were never set to be, alongside Gore Verbinski's take on Bioshock, is the Halo movie. It was once being shepherded by Peter Jackson and Neill Biomkamp, but as costs escalated, it headed back to development hell, and it's not been seen since.

That doesn't stop the occasional rumor springing up of course, and this week, it was said that Ridley Scott would be producing a big screen take on the Halo games. In effect, that the movie project was still on. Microsoft, however, has iterated that it very much isn't.

In the midst of a PR blah statement that it released to Eurogamer, Microsoft finally got to the nub of matters, saying that "we plan to continue telling the Halo story through innovative channels, but there are no plans for a Halo motion picture at this time".

Instead, the focus will inevitably remain on the games themselves, but also the previously announced television series that's heading to Xbox Live (which Steven Spielberg is involved with).

Eurogamer.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

New details of Sinister Six and Venom movies

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew1/16/2014 at 8:24AM

Writer Robert Orci has been chatting about the planned Spider-Man spin-off movies, Sinister Six and Venom...

It was revealed towards the end of last year that Sony was looking to further expand the Spider-Man universe on screen, with a series of spin-off movies. Those are in addition to the three already-announced sequels to The Amazing Spider-Man, the first of which hits UK cinemas in April.

One of the writers and producers of those spin-offs is Roberto Orci, and he's been chatting to IGN about the projects. In particular, how do you make a Sinister Six movie that's chock-full of villainy and make it fit? Does it stay villain-centric, or do at least some of them have to be good? As Orci says, "that's the discussion we're having right now: how exactly do you do that, and how do you do it without betraying the audience and making them all mean?".

Joking at first that "Drew Goddard is going to be writing that one, so it's kind of his problem", Orci went on to say that the announced writers for the Spider-Man spin-offs - himself, Alex Kurtzman, Jeff Pinkner, Ed Solomon and Goddard - are "all working on each other's stuff".

"We want to be true to it, but there are some great antiheroes in this day and age", he continued. "There's been examples of that even on TV - Vic Mackey on The Shield, one of the great antiheroes of all time. There are ways to milk that story. Audiences have seen everything. They've seen all the good guys who never do anything wrong. Is there a story in seeing the other side? That's the challenge and that's the fun. I'm not sure how we're going to do that yet".

At least we know the source of the impending villainy. "Oscorp plays an important part in how our villains get created", he revealed. Which suggests that through the spin-offs that the Osborn family is going to have quite the part to play.

You can read the full interview at IGN, here.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Star Wars: 11 Marvel Comics Star Wars Characters We'd Like to See Again

$
0
0
The ListsMarc Buxton1/16/2014 at 8:31AM

Marvel Comics added a number of interesting characters to the Star Wars expanded universe. Here are a few we'd like to see again...

With the recent announcement that Star Wars is returning to the hallowed halls of Marvel Comics, it is time to look back at the Marvel era from a long time ago. Some amazing comic creators like Roy Thomas, Archie Goodwin, Mary Jo Duffy, Walt Simonson, and Howard Chaykin all helped build the earliest expanded universe stories, continuing and adding to the film that captivated so many. It was Marvel that kept the lightsabers lit in the long years between films, giving fans their only taste of the Star Wars universe as they waited for the next installments. Here are some of the memorable characters that graced the pages of Marvel’s Star Warscomics that we hope to see return in some form.

But before we begin, we would like to express our respect for the twenty plus years that Dark Horse published some of the most amazing science fiction comics ever. The time of Star Wars at Dark Horse will forever be remembered as one of the most brilliantly creative and fertile eras of storytelling in Star Wars history. You can read about 13 of our favorite Dark Horse Comics Star Wars stories right here!


Crimson Jack
First Appearance: Star Wars #7 (1977)
Writers: Roy Thomas and Howard Chaykin  
Artist: Howard Chaykin

Crimson Jack (or "Redbeard" as Han Solo dubbed him) has the distinction of being Star Wars’ first expanded universe villain and created one of the first continuity conundrums between films. The first six issues of Marvel’s Star Wars were adaptations of A New Hope, but after issue six, Marvel turned to original stories from the minds of Howard Chaykin and Roy Thomas to feed fans’ need for all things Star Wars. Han and Chewie first encountered Crimson Jack when the pirate hijacked the Falcon and stole the reward Han received for the rescue of Princess Leia and his participation in the Battle of Yavin. From there, Jack became a recurring threat to Han and the Rebellion. One memorable encounter saw Han saving Jabba the Hut (the walrus looking one in yellow that predated his official slug-like screen debut) from Jack, thus earning Jabba’s gratitude which caused the crime lord to forgive Han's debt and remove the bounty from his head. This posed a problem for Marvel come Empire Strikes Back because, as all fans know, Han began the film with the price still firmly on his head. Marvel had to get creative and had to come up for a reason for Jabba to once again get mightily pissed at Solo right before Empire premiered. 


Jaxxon
First appearance: Star Wars #8 (1977)
Writer: Roy Thomas
Artist: Howard Chaykin

What classic sci-fi saga is complete without a badass rabbit? Before Bucky O’Hare, before Usagi Yojimbo, before Captain Carrot, there was Jaxxon. Jaxxon is often cited as one of the sillier characters in Marvel’s Star Wars run, but looking at it all from a modern perspective, Jaxxon was pretty awesome. It was up to Marvel’s writers too populate Lucas’ galaxy with characters and creatures of all shapes and sizes, so why not a spacefaring rabbit? Jaxxon was a grizzled space vet, a brave warrior and a capable pilot who fought side by side with the Rebels in the earliest days of Marvel’s Star Wars series. Jaxxon was quickly removed from the comic after a few appearances sparking a legend that George Lucas himself demanded the removal as he found the character too silly. Of course, the creation of Jar Jar Binks proved that George Lucas does not have a silly threshold so the reasons behind Jaxxon’s dismissal from the book remain a mystery. Whatever the case, Jaxxon added an anything goes element to the early Star Wars stories. If Marvel wants to honor their roots, perhaps it is time that Jaxxon (and his ship: The Rabbit’s Foot) fly again.

[related article: 11 Comics That Act as Movie Sequels]



Baron Orman Tagge
First Appearance: Star Wars #25 (1979)
Writer: Archie Goodwin
Artist: Carmine Infantino


Baron Tagge was first non-film character to wield a lightsaber. Tagge’s other noteworthy contribution to Star Wars lore was that he was an adversary to both Darth Vader and Luke Skywalker, little knowing of course, that his enemies were actually father and son. Tagge was a pragmatic and ruthless businessman who had nothing but contempt for old world religions and superstitions (like his more famous brother Cassio Tagge), thus he dismissed the Force and thought he was more suitable to be the Emperor’s strong right hand than Vader. After Vader’s disgrace when the first Death Star was destroyed, Tagge started making a play for Darth Vader’s position. Tagge was a powerful business and military leader and brought all his resources into play to take down Luke Skywalker and the Rebellion in order to prove his superiority over Vader. Vader was having none of it and after a complex series of events, forced Tagge to duel Luke Skywalker. Vader used the force to make Luke see Tagge as Darth Vader. When Luke killed Tagge, Vader dropped his illusion and enjoyed his two-fold victory. One, he had defeated Tagge, a man who swore to bring Vader down, and two he secured Tagge’s loyalists as allies against Skywalker. Tagge was a complex individual who held most of the galaxy in contempt but loved his sister and tried to keep her pure. When Luke killed Tagge, Tagge’s sister, Domina, became a sworn enemy of the Rebellion, a tragic dynamic that Marvel can also revisit.


Plif
First appearance: Star Wars #55 (1981)
Writer: David Michelinie
Artist: Walt Simonson

Plif may look like a rejected Berkeley Breathed character, but one would be hard pressed to find a more loyal ally to the Rebellion. Plif was the leader of a telepathic race of errr, things, called the Hoojibs. After Plif and his people helped Princess Leia and a band of Rebels defeat an aggressive alien incursion, the Hoojibs became an important part of the Rebel Alliance. After Plif first appeared, it was rare to see an issue of Star Wars without a Hoojib on one of the heroes’ shoulders. These fuzzballs weren’t just cute; they were master strategists and fearless allies. They weren’t cloyingly sweet but a constant and important part of Marvel’s landscape. Any Star Wars comic from Marvel would seem a little bit empty without brave Plif or at least one Hoojib around.

Lumiya
First appearance: Star Wars #56 (1981)
Writers: Writers David Michelinie, Walter Simonson, and Louise Jones
Artist: Walter Simonson

The story of Lumiya was one of the most riveting and surprising characters arcs of Marvel’s entire run, so much so that Lumiya, the Dark Lady was one of the few Marvel characters that Dark Horse fully utilized during their years of Star Wars publication. Fans first knew Lumiya as Shira Elan Colla Brie, a brave rebel pilot, ally and possible love interest to Luke Skywalker. Secretly, Brie was the Emperor and Vader’s secret weapon against the Alliance, a cunning infiltrator ready to strike and destroy the Rebellion from within. Brie fought side by side with the Rebels for a long period of time while secretly reporting back to Vader. When Brie made her move and attempted to shoot down Luke Skywalker, Luke, guided by the force, shot down Brie. When he found out the Force told him to fire on his comrade, Luke actually doubted the Force for the first time. Vader found the profoundly injured Brie and remade her into Lumiya, the Dark Lady. Complete with a lightwhip, (you hear that Abrams? LIGHT…WHIP…film it!) Lumiya was meant to be the major antagonist in the post Return of the Jedi era of Marvel's Star Wars comics. Lumiya is killed in the rushed final issue of Marvel’s Star Wars (#107) but would later return because Dark Horse understood just how awesome this mysteriously shrouded woman was. Lumiya represents the next generation of Sith and let’s hope Marvel recognizes her potential for future use. Hell, let’s hope Disney considers her filmworthy, because, as any fan of old school Marvel will tell you, Lumiya was truly one of Star Wars’ greatest and most complex villains.


The Darker
First appearance: Star Wars #67 (1982)
Writer: David Michelinie
Artist: Ron Frenz

The Darker was like a Dementor stuck right into the Star Wars Universe decades before the ghostly fear demons tormented Harry Potter. It was rare to find a villain or creature in the Star Wars galaxy not connected somehow to the Emperor or at least to Jabba the Hutt. The Darker was composed of the negative energies of his people, the Arban. After the debacle on Hoth, the Rebels were searching for a new base and ran afoul of the Darker in a hidden cavern. The Darker is a pretty cool sci-fi concept, all the rage and base impulses of a race locked up waiting for unsuspecting travelers it could devour. The Darker was a memorable foe who was finally defeated by Chewbacca, C-3P0, and R2-D2, but it was only used once in the pages of old school Marvel. Marvel should be aware that the concept of the Darker is just too cool to keep buried forever.


Tobbi Dala and Fenn Shysa
First Appearance: Star Wars #68 (1982)
Writer:David Michelinie
Artist: Gene Day

No doubt, Boba Fett was one of the most intriguing characters from the original trilogy. Boba defined badassness with cool armor and a Man With No Name like demeanor that fascinated film goers from the moment Vader briefed Fett and the other Bounty Hunters on the bridge of the Star Destroyer Executor. In 1982, fans had only caught a few fleeting glimpses of Fett’s sheer coolness in The Empire Strikes Back, so when Fenn and Tobbi were introduced in the pages of Marvel’s Star Wars, fans were thrilled at the chance to see a little glimpse into Fett’s background and see more Mandalorians in action. Fenn was the leader of an elite group of Mandalorians that helped the Rebels battle the Empire while Tobbi sacrificed himself to save Leia and his own people. Their backstory revealed that Boba Fett once fought side by side with the Mandalorians before he became a bounty hunter and that Tobbi and Fenn represented the honored tradition that Fett turned his back on. Fenn stuck around as a supporting character, each appearance offering fans a rare glimpse into Fett’s history. Of course, all of Fenn’s appearances were removed from canon because of the revelation in Attack of the Clones that Boba Fett was a clone of Jango Fett, but this does not lessen the impact of these early Marvel glimpses into Mandalorian history as Marvel’s great creators tried to shed some light on the mystery that was Fett. Maybe Marvel can figure out a way to once again weave Fenn and Tobbi into current Star Wars continuity.


Dani
First Appearance: Star Wars #70 (1983)
Writer: Mary Jo Duffy
Artists: Kerry Gammill and Tom Palmer

Before the prequels era and the arrival of Padme Amidala, Padme’s myriad handmaidens, and  Asoka, the Star Wars Galaxy had a dearth of female characters that creators could use to enrich the Expanded Universe. Marvel's Star Wars introduced a wide array of interesting and multi-faceted females picking up the slack in a world where the only X chromosome belonged to Princess Leia. Dani was one of the more fascinating females to enrich Marvel’s corner of the Star Wars Galaxy. Dani’s alien appearance would have made her right at home in Captain Kirk’s bed. Her scantily clad pink figure stood out against the usually sexless (until Leia put on the bikini) world of Star Wars. She was from a race that valued pleasure and sensuality above all else, and when she was first introduced, Dani was used as a foil for the still rather innocent Luke Skywalker. Dani soon became a staunch ally to the rebel alliance bravely taking many missions besides Luke and company in the later years of Marvel’s title. Dani joined Luke and the Rebellion after the Battle of Endor and was one of the first characters to confront the greatest post-Rebel threat to the heroes, Lumiya, the Dark Lady. There, she lost her true love Chihdo and fell into a deep depression, a state that is counterintuitive to her race's constant quest for sensual pleasure. Chihdo was not truly dead, but writer Mary Jo Duffy never got to wrap up this plot thread as Marvel’s Star Wars was abruptly cancelled in 1986. Fans have been waiting decades to see Dani reunite with her lost love, a plot thread that Marvel might want to revisit in the present day. Dani would be an interesting character to bring back if modern Marvel would do a bridge series between Jedi and the upcoming Episode VII, she adds a much needed element of femininity to the era, and has a certain Flash Gordon-like appeal that could create a classic dynamic for any new Marvel series.


Rik Duel
First appearance: Star Wars #70 (1983)
Writer: Mary Jo Duffy
Artists: Kerry Gammill and Tom Palmer

Rik Duel was an unrepentant scoundrel, a handsome smuggler who lived for adventure and the big pay day. He was everything Han Solo could have been if Solo had not found love and morality in a galactic rebellion against the Empire. Duel was a figure from Solo’s past, a troublemaker and confidant who helped Solo during many ill-conceived excursions. In the present, he was a reminder of Solo’s past misdeeds and a temptation for Solo to abandon his responsibilities and again live a life of free-wheeling profiteering. There was a sense of honor in Duel who helped save Lando and Dani from the clutches of IG-88 and Bossk in one of Marvel’s best storylines, but he was also the man who began looting abandoned Imperial planets after the battle of Endor. Duel would be a great character for Marvel to revisit because he is an echo of Solo’s past, a man who never found love within a heroic band of rebels. Duel was an early Expanded Universe peek into the underbelly of the galaxy, a world of smugglers, pirates, and nonstop adventure.


Tippett the Ewok
First Appearance: Star Wars #94 (1985)
Writer: Jo Duffy
Artist: Cynthia Martin

Tippett was a brave Ewok warrior and betrothed to an Ewok princess, and he bravely battled a Lahsbee warrior who morphed into a powerful monster for the honor of the Ewoks. When Tippett realized the Ewoks and the Lahsbee had both been manipulated by the evil Hiromi Empire (who looked like beret wearing beatnik insects, GET ON THAT HASBRO!), Tippett proved himself to be a skilled ambassador by brokering a peace between his people and the stubbornly proud Lahsbee. Tippett seemed to be on the verge of becoming an important character in Marvel’s Star Wars Universe by becoming a post Return of the Jedi focus as the voice of the Rebellion’s new found allies, the Ewoks. If there were to be further Endor adventures for Marvel (and there seemed to be a few set up before Star Wars’ untimely cancellation) it was Tippett that was to be a central figure of those stories. Maybe current Marvel could pick up where 1985 Marvel left off by allowing Tippett time to be the comic book face of the Ewoks. No one tell Wicket, please.

BONUS ENTRY! Yes, while this version of Jabba isn't canon and can't/won't return in any new incarnation of Marvel's Star Wars, he's still a perfect example of how important Marvel was to the early days of the Star Wars expanded universe!


Jabba the Hut
First Appearance: Star Wars #2
Writer: Roy Thomas
Artist: Howard Chaykin

Before the premiere of Return of the Jedi in 1984, legions of Star Wars fans’ only exposure to Jabba the Hutt, the vilest crime lord in the galaxy, came courtesy of Marvel Comics. In the second of a six part adaptation of A New Hope, readers got to see Jabba the Hutt, (or "Hut" as Marvel spelled it) for the first time, and he wasn’t the corpulent slug fans have grown to love. Marvel’s Hut was a yellow skinned alien walrus looking dude with tufts of hair on his face. Y’see, in the original script of Star Wars there was a scene where Han Solo meets with Jabba in order to establish Solo’s status as a criminal on the run from his past. Lucas even filmed the sequence with a pudgy actor in a fur coat standing in for Jabba. Lucas intended to add a stop motion puppet later but decided to cut the scene for various cost cutting and pacing reasons finally inserting the Jabba (via questionable CGI effects in the Special Edition). Marvel did not abandon the sequence and used one of the random Cantina aliens (Mosep Binneed to be exact...the line forms to the left, ladies) as their de facto Jabba. For the newly minted Star Wars fan, this was the only representation of Jabba until Return of the Jedi. The original run of Marvel’s Star Wars comics were often contradicted by a future film, but old time fans will never forget the seven years that, in their imaginations, Jabba was a bipedal walrus looking humanoid. This version of Jabba would return in Star Wars#28 and Star Wars #37 becoming one of the series’ early recurring villains.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

What about the "Droid World"?

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki...

The Nut Job Review

$
0
0
ReviewDavid Crow1/16/2014 at 8:40AM

The Nut Job will raise many interesting questions...as your mind focuses on anything except this plot.

If a pop culture fad appears in a low-grade kids movie, was it ever truly popular to begin with? Forgive the quandary, but this is one of the many questions adults may find themselves musing over while spaced out during The Nut Job'slavish 86-minute running time. That and why did we ever care for Psy’s “Gangnam Style” in the first place?
 
Distributed by Open Road Films, The Nut Jobis the first theatrical effort from animation studios Toolbox Entertainment and Korean-based Redrover International, which attempts to adapt Director Peter Lepeniotis’ 2005 short film, "Surly the Squirrel," into a film that features celebrity voices and cuddly creatures who do indeed ultimately bring the “Gangnam Style” dance to computer generated life. In short: Pixar, this ain’t.
 
Set in American City U.S.A. roughly during the mid-1950s, The Nut Job is the tale of one persistently selfish squirrel named Surly (Will Arnett) and his quest to have enough nuts for winter. Despite his excessive scheming, he comes off as a repellently squirrely Mr. Potter who cares little for his park neighbors, including Andie the Squirrel (Katherine Heigl), Mole the Mole (Jeff Dunham), and Grayson (Brendan Fraser) the Heroic George Bailey of Squirrel-dom. Together, the other park animals have engineered a communal Savings & Nuts organization for winter spearheaded by the austere Raccoon the Raccoon (Liam Neeson), but it is all for naught when during Surly’s latest scheme to steal popcorn from a nearby vendor, he inadvertently blows up the autumn harvest. Exiled and abandoned to live in the urban alleyways of the city, Surly’s only friend is Buddy the Rat. At least that is until he finds a way to break into a nearby ritzy nut store with enough swag to feed the park for years. The con is on.
 
The Nut Job is a perfectly pedestrian animated film that checks off many of the boxes that have been left on every studio’s spreadsheets since DreamWorks struck gold with Shrek. There are (dated) pop culture references to be noticed and celebrity voices to be admired for going cutesy. And for young ones that is not necessarily a bad thing. There is a decent message about not being so selfish and caring about one’s community, as Surly begins to think of his friends and the park as his own responsibility, as well as a hearty helping of slapstick humor and flatulence-based jokes that’s hilarity will be compounded with every year spent less on this Earth. However as a family entertainment, The Nut Jobcan be found severely wanting.

Lepeniotis and his co-screenwriter Lorne Cameron attempt to sprinkle in some meta-humor for the parents, as Surly and his crew assume heist movie dynamics concurrently with another onion layer of thievery found in the nut store’s owners, a group of 1950s gangsters and greasers preparing to knock over the nearby bank. As Surly discovers there’s a (ahem) mole in his operation, so too will the gangsters upstairs slowly reveal their double-crosses, resulting in a multi-plotted chase sequence finale. However, all this would-be scheming falls flatter than the movie’s pulse, in part because we don’t care about the human characters in the B-plot, and also because we care even less about the animal critters scurrying across the nut store’s basement. The one notable exception is the inevitable audience favorite Precious, a furry pug who is more frantic than ferocious. She is voiced with an infectious enthusiasm by Maya Rudolph, who stands alone in raising a chuckle out of any viewer over the age of nine. In fact, the only thing wrong with this inside mutt is that she may remind older viewers of Dug, the scene-stealing Golden Retriever from Up.
 
And it is unfortunate for any parent enduring this picture to be reminded that animation can be more than mere distractions for children, cinematic babysitters at 90 minutes a pop. Animation can be a source of ageless amusement and even cathartic liberation with your imagination and emotion set free from the burden of reality. It is a visual dreamscape that can wield affectations like a grenade, making a 10-minute prologue in that other movie with a talking dog one of the most bittersweet love stories ever experienced in a movie house.
 
The Nut Job has its place too as that eventual Netflix rental that is left streaming in the bonus room to offer an hour-plus of reprieve. But in the context of a movie season where Frozenis still enchanting every multiplex in the country, and The Lego Movie and The Wind Rises are only a month away from American release, The Nut Job feels like a sideshow scam in contrast.
 
Early in The Nut Job, Grayson’s super-squirrel instincts sniff out the presence of Buddy hiding in a tree above him. “I smell a rat,” the heroic rodent exclaims. That makes two of us.
 
Den of Geek Rating: 2 out of 5 Stars
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.
4

Cold in July Author Joe R. Lansdale Talks About The Movie Adaptation

$
0
0
InterviewMarc Buxton1/16/2014 at 9:53AM

The film version of Joe R. Lansdale's Cold In July opens at Sundance this week, and we spoke to him about the project.

Cold in July was one of genre giant’s Joe R. Lansdale’s first novels, and the film version, directed by Jim Mickle, will open at Sundance on January 18th. Published in 1989, Cold in July is the story of Richard Dane (to be played by Michael C. Hall in the film), a man who kills a burglar in self-defense only to have the burglar’s father (Sam Shepard) swear to kill Dane’s son as an act of vengeance. Lansdale’s prose, darkly funny and always surprising is perfect for film exploitation, as fans who will soon see Cold in July are going to find out. With an eye for nuanced characters and deft plot twists, Mr. Lansdale has long been a master of crime, horror, and strange fiction. We got to sit down with Joe R. Lansdale and find more about this exciting project. So make plans to see the film and grab a copy of the novel, because Cold in July is a gripping, dark tale that is well worth discovery.

How did the film version of Cold in July come about?

Cold In July has been optioned before. Seven years running by John Irving. It didn't happen. It went fallow until Jim Mickle (director) and Nick Damici (screenwriter) picked it up.

Tell us about the director, Jim Mickle. How deeply have you discussed the project with him? 

Jim is a great guy and we discussed it a lot. I saw all scripts but the final one. But those changes were minor. I felt respected through the entire process.

Tell us about the two main characters, Richard Dane played by Michael C. Hall and Russel played by Sam Shepard. What motivates them?

A desire to somehow be strong fathers and correct mistakes, some threats, some mistakes belonging to other people. They have a connection in spite of themselves.

The motif of violence is one of the threads that bind the novel together? Do you think the violence in the story will be more visceral on screen?

I think it will be about the same.

You wrote the novel in 1989, after almost 25 years, how does it feel to see it reach a new medium?

It’s interesting. I didn't write it for film, but film has always been, after books, a secondary influence. So it certainly fits with film.

With so many novels under your belt since Cold in July, how do you view the novel now, twenty five years later?

I have always been fond of it and still am. It was filmed as 1989, like the book, but except for certain technological advancements, it feels kind of timeless.

Michael C. Hall was quite the “get.” Have you had a chance to meet with Mr. Hall, and how does it feel to have such a genre icon step into your world?

I saw Michael a lot. On set. Dinners. Great guy, amazing actor.

What themes of your novel would you like to see transfer into the film?

I think they nailed them and I'll leave the examination of themes to the reader and viewer. I will say this.  It's about fathers, good and bad, and the weight of that responsibility.

How much of the shoot have you witnessed?

I was on the set for two weeks. Would have been there more if I could. Loved it.

What is your philosophy on film adaptations of your work? Did you believe in director’s prerogative or are you protective of your material?

I'm protective when I can be, but if you are willing to cash the check you have to  know when to shut up. In my case, with Jim and screenwriter and actor, Nick Damici, I felt in very good hands.

Any updates on any other film or television projects in the works?

Stay tuned.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


Oscar Nominations Announced

$
0
0
NewsJohn Saavedra1/16/2014 at 10:26AM

This year's Oscar nominations have been announced, and it's filled with surprises!

Another year at the red carpet, as the 86th Academy Awards prepare to celebrate the best in filmmaking. Come March 2, we will undoubtedly witness triumphs, disappointments, tears, and excitement, as the stars assemble to pay homage one of the world's greatest artforms. 
The Academy announced their Oscar nominees this year at the crack of dawn for most of Hollywood (5:30am PST).
 
The awards were filled with surprises, such as Gravity tying American Hustle for 10 nominations overall—12 Years a Slave is right behind them with nine nominations—but many of the pieces fell exactly where they were supposed to. So without further adieu, here is the full list of nominees for the 86th Academy Awards. Get ready to make your predictions!
 
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE
Christian Bale in “American Hustle”
Bruce Dern in “Nebraska”
Leonardo DiCaprio in “The Wolf of Wall Street”
Chiwetel Ejiofor in “12 Years a Slave”
Matthew McConaughey in “Dallas Buyers Club”
 
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Barkhad Abdi in “Captain Phillips”
Bradley Cooper in “American Hustle”
Michael Fassbender in “12 Years a Slave”
Jonah Hill in “The Wolf of Wall Street”
Jared Leto in “Dallas Buyers Club”
 
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE
Amy Adams in “American Hustle”
Cate Blanchett in “Blue Jasmine”
Sandra Bullock in “Gravity”
Judi Dench in “Philomena”
Meryl Streep in “August: Osage County”
 
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Sally Hawkins in “Blue Jasmine”
Jennifer Lawrence in “American Hustle”
Lupita Nyong’o in “12 Years a Slave”
Julia Roberts in “August: Osage County”
June Squibb in “Nebraska”
 
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM OF THE YEAR
“The Croods”
Chris Sanders, Kirk DeMicco and Kristine Belson
“Despicable Me 2”
Chris Renaud, Pierre Coffin and Chris Meledandri
“Ernest & Celestine”
Benjamin Renner and Didier Brunner
“Frozen”
Chris Buck, Jennifer Lee and Peter Del Vecho
“The Wind Rises”
Hayao Miyazaki and Toshio Suzuki
 
ACHIEVEMENT IN CINEMATOGRAPHY
“The Grandmaster” Philippe Le Sourd
“Gravity” Emmanuel Lubezki
“Inside Llewyn Davis” Bruno Delbonnel
“Nebraska” Phedon Papamichael
“Prisoners” Roger A. Deakins
 
ACHIEVEMENT IN COSTUME DESIGN
“American Hustle” Michael Wilkinson
“The Grandmaster” William Chang Suk Ping
“The Great Gatsby” Catherine Martin
“The Invisible Woman” Michael O’Connor
“12 Years a Slave” Patricia Norris
 
ACHIEVEMENT IN DIRECTING
“American Hustle” David O. Russell
“Gravity” Alfonso Cuarón
“Nebraska” Alexander Payne
“12 Years a Slave” Steve McQueen
“The Wolf of Wall Street” Martin Scorsese
 
BEST DOCUMENTARY FEATURE
“The Act of Killing” (Drafthouse Films)
A Final Cut for Real Production
“Cutie and the Boxer” (RADiUS-TWC)
An Ex Lion Tamer and Cine Mosaic Production
“Dirty Wars” (IFC Films)
A Civic Bakery Production
“The Square” (Netflix in association with Worldview
Entertainment and Participant Media)
A Noujaim Films and Maktube Production
“20 Feet from Stardom” (RADiUS-TWC)
A Gil Friesen Productions and Tremolo Production
 
BEST DOCUMENTARY SHORT SUBJECT
“CaveDigger”
A Karoffilms Production
“Facing Fear”
A Jason Cohen Production
“Karama Has No Walls”
A Hot Spot Films Production
“The Lady in Number 6: Music Saved My Life”
A Reed Entertainment Production“Prison Terminal: The Last Days of Private Jack Hall”
A Prison Terminal LLC Production
 
ACHIEVEMENT IN FILM EDITING
“American Hustle” Jay Cassidy, Crispin Struthers and Alan Baumgarten
“Captain Phillips” Christopher Rouse
“Dallas Buyers Club” John Mac McMurphy and Martin Pensa
“Gravity” Alfonso Cuarón and Mark Sanger
“12 Years a Slave” Joe Walker
 
BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM OF THE YEAR
“The Broken Circle Breakdown”
A Menuet Production
“The Great Beauty”
An Indigo Film Production
“The Hunt”
A Zentropa Entertainments 19 Production
“The Missing Picture”
A Bophana Production
“Omar”
An Omar Production Company Production
 
ACHIEVEMENT IN MAKEUP AND HAIRSTYLING
“Dallas Buyers Club” Adruitha Lee and Robin Mathews
“Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa” Stephen Prouty
“The Lone Ranger” Joel Harlow and Gloria Pasqua-Casny
 
ACHIEVEMENT IN MUSIC WRITTEN FOR MOTION PICTURES (ORIGINAL SCORE)
“The Book Thief” John Williams
“Gravity” Steven Price
“Her” William Butler and Owen Pallett
“Philomena” Alexandre Desplat
“Saving Mr. Banks” Thomas Newman
 
ACHIEVEMENT IN MUSIC WRITTEN FOR MOTION PICTURES (ORIGINAL SONG)
“Alone Yet Not Alone” from “Alone Yet Not Alone”
“Happy” from “Despicable Me 2”
“Let It Go” from “Frozen”
“The Moon Song” from “Her”
“Ordinary Love” from “Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom”
 
BEST MOTION PICTURE OF THE YEAR
“American Hustle”
A Columbia Pictures and Annapurna Pictures Production
“Captain Phillips” A Columbia Pictures Production
“Dallas Buyers Club”
A Voltage Pictures, R2 Films, Evolution Independent Production
“Gravity”
A Warner Bros. UK Services Limited Production
“Her”
An Annapurna Production
“Nebraska”
A Paramount Vantage Production
“Philomena”
A Pathé, BBC Films, BFI, Canal+, Cine+ and Baby Cow/Magnolia Mae Production
“12 Years a Slave”
A River Road, Plan B, New Regency Production
“The Wolf of Wall Street”
A Red Granite Production
 
ACHIEVEMENT IN PRODUCTION DESIGN
“American Hustle” Production Design: Judy Becker; Set Decoration: Heather Loeffler
“Gravity” Production Design: Andy Nicholson; Set Decoration: Rosie Goodwin and Joanne Woollard
“The Great Gatsby” Production Design: Catherine Martin; Set Decoration: Beverley Dunn
“Her” Production Design: K.K. Barrett; Set Decoration: Gene Serdena
“12 Years a Slave” Production Design: Adam Stockhausen; Set Decoration: Alice Baker
 
BEST ANIMATED SHORT FILM
“Feral”
A Daniel Sousa Production
“Get a Horse!”
A Walt Disney Animation Production
“Mr. Hublot”
A Zeilt Production
“Possessions”
A Sunrise Production
“Room on the Broom”
A Magic Light Pictures Production
 
BEST LIVE ACTION SHORT FILM
“Aquel No Era Yo (That Wasn’t Me)”
A Producciones Africanauan Production
“Avant Que De Tout Perdre (Just before Losing Everything)”
A KG Production
“Helium”
An M & M Production
“Pitääkö Mun Kaikki Hoitaa? (Do I Have to Take Care of Everything?)”
A Tuffi Films Production
“The Voorman Problem” A Honlodge Production
 
ACHIEVEMENT IN SOUND EDITING
“All Is Lost” Steve Boeddeker and Richard Hymns
“Captain Phillips” Oliver Tarney
“Gravity” Glenn Freemantle
“The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug” Brent Burge
“Lone Survivor” Wylie Stateman
 
ACHIEVEMENT IN SOUND MIXING
“Captain Phillips” Chris Burdon, Mark Taylor, Mike Prestwood Smith
“Gravity” Skip Lievsay, Niv Adiri, Christopher Benstead and
“The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug” Christopher Boyes, Michael Hedges,
“Inside Llewyn Davis” Skip Lievsay, Greg Orloff and Peter F. Kurland
“Lone Survivor” Andy Koyama, Beau Borders and David Brownlow
 
ACHIEVEMENT IN VISUAL EFFECTS
“Gravity” Tim Webber, Chris Lawrence, Dave Shirk and
“The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug” Joe Letteri, Eric Saindon, David Clayton and Eric Reynolds
“Iron Man 3” Christopher Townsend, Guy Williams, Erik Nash and Dan Sudick
“The Lone Ranger” Tim Alexander, Gary Brozenich, Edson Williams and John Frazier.
“Star Trek Into Darkness” Roger Guyett, Patrick Tubach, Ben Grossmann and Burt Dalton.
 
ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
“Before Midnight” Written by Richard Linklater, Julie Delpy,
“Captain Phillips” Screenplay by Billy Ray
“Philomena” Screenplay by Steve Coogan and Jeff Pope
“12 Years a Slave” Screenplay by John Ridley
“The Wolf of Wall Street” Screenplay by Terence Winter
 
ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
“American Hustle” Written by Eric Warren Singer and David O. Russell
“Blue Jasmine” Written by Woody Allen
“Dallas Buyers Club” Written by Craig Borten & Melisa Wallack
“Her” Written by Spike Jonze
“Nebraska” Written by Bob Nelson
 
Who will win big at the 86th Oscars ceremony? Start predicting in our comments section!
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

New Trailer For Hammer’s The Quiet Ones

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/16/2014 at 1:59PM

Watch the newest trailer for the latest supernatural horror movie, The Quiet Ones, from the studio of Let Me In and The Woman In Black.

We are so happy that Hammer Studios is back in some capacity. While they don’t release a film every year, since their rebirth they’ve reliably released old school fright fests for those who like it when something goes bump in the movie. And after Let Me In and The Woman in Black, they appear ready to continue the trend in the spine-tingling trailer for The Quiet Ones.
 
 
Supposedly based on true events, this period piece horror looks equal parts Hellhouse and Exorcist in its grand setting of 1970s creepy-crawlies. The intentionally vintage look promises hopefully another grand freak show when university student (Sam Claflin of The Hunger Games: Catching Fire) and some classmates are recruited to carry out a private experiment by a peculiar scientist (Jared Harris of Mad Men and Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows) -- to create a poltergeist. Their subject: an alluring, but dangerously disturbed young woman (Olivia Cooke of Bates Motel). Their quest: to explore the dark energy that her damaged psyche might manifest. As the experiment unravels along with their sanity, the rogue PHD students are soon confronted with a terrifying reality: they have triggered an unspeakable force with a power beyond all explanation. Inspired by true events, The Quiet Ones is directed by John Pogue from a screenplay by Craig Rosenberg and Oren Moverman and John Pogue, and based on a screenplay by Tom de Ville.
 
The Quiet Onesopens April 25, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Oscar Nominations: Snubs and Analysis

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow1/16/2014 at 3:12PM

We look at who was surprisingly left out of the Oscar nominations this morning, and who stands to win come March.

Every awards season brings a slew of glistening Oscar nominees and soon to be Academy Award winning darlings. However, that is not the story people really care about. They want to know who was snubbed, dissed, ignored, and just overall wronged in the gilded fury that is nomination day. And further, now that we have the contenders, who is poised to take the stage of that shining Dolby Theatre with an auspiciously bright little gold man in their hand? We break down the snubs, the misses, and the probable awards dynamics from this year’s Oscar nominees.
 
The one movie to most surprisingly get snubbed for this year is Captain Phillips. A harrowing thriller that captured the real-life nightmare of a merchant vessel overtaken by Somali pirates, it was a white-knuckled thrill ride with an Academy Award-ready performance—by apparently only Barkhad Abdi as the chief hostage taker. And Abdi was genuinely fantastic in a performance that more than deserves its recognition. But one gnawing question lingers—where is Tom Hanks?

Once the posterboy of the Academy—he was nominated five times by the AMPAS between 1989 and 2001, winning twice consecutively for Philadelphia and Forrest Gump—Hanks has found himself again and again left out in the cold following memorable turns, and Captain Phillipsis easily his best performance in years. The final scene of the movie where he comes to grips with the reality of his situation is so raw and powerful that I wrote in September that “[It] will linger long past Captain Phillips' opening weekend and well through awards season.” Whoops.
 
So what happened? Apparently, the Academy just did not like this barebones thriller that depended on (incredibly) intense suspense over multi-layered plotting. Indeed, my one critique was that when it occasionally reached for broader, macro-awareness of the West’s entire history with Somalia and Africa as a whole, it often felt strained and wanting. That is also perhaps why Paul Greengrass, who received the Directors Guild nomination for his effort, was also shut out of the Best Director category by the Academy. Indeed, it only got a token spot in the Best Picture stable, which can now fit up to 10 nominees (though the AMPAS only elected to give nine film as a nod this year), but we all know the five directorial nominees is the “real” short list. However, many of these same criticisms and stylings could also be addressed to Greengrass’ previous Best Picture and Best Director effort, United 93. This change in tone might simply be due to 2013 being much more competitive a year than 2006. Also, while Alexander Payne’s rather minimalist approach to Nebraska would obviously appeal less to a guild of directors, a voting body like the Academy, even its more traditional directors, has proven it is always gaga for Payne. And strangely, it was Greengrass who got the boot from the category, as opposed to the sci-fi auteur…Nonetheless, it is still curious that the one about 9/11 is recognized, but the story of Captain Phillips surviving is largely ignored.

Another co-star of Hanks’ who also felt the icy cold shoulder today was Emma Thompson with her remarkable turn in Saving Mr. Banks. While the movie itself was always going to be a little too schmaltzy (and creatively loose with the facts) to garner recognition in the “big categories,” Thompson is, without hyperbole, marvelous in that movie. She is so perfectly prim and brittle in her performance as P.L. Travers, the woman who created Mary Poppins, that the filmmakers defiantly ended the film on a closing credits sequence that played actual audio of Travers’ “suggestions” to the Disney creative team. They knew Thompson was that effortlessly perfect. Hence, Thompson picking up nominations at the Golden Globes, SAG, BAFTA, and the Critics Choice Awards. Yet, she was found empty-handed this morning when the Oscars came around. The obvious reason for that is the Academy chose to recognize Amy Adams for Best Actress when she went ignored by the traditional acting indicator of SAG. Adams also won the Golden Globe, however that was in the Globe specific category of “Best Actress in a Comedy” (American Hustle is a comedy?). Personally, we are glad to see Adams recognized by the Academy in a performance that was less showy than many of her co-stars’ parts (though she certainly showed the most plunging necklines). Adams is ultimately the emotional crux of the picture. However, the fact that bait-ish work like August: Osage County would get in there first is more a tribute to either Meryl Streep’s reputation as the best actress alive, The Weinstein Company’s Oscar reach, or both. Because it certainly is not the one to beat.

One movie that was determined to be the opposite of “Oscar bait,” and proved it today, is Inside Llewyn Davis. A slight, but moving ode to the indie folk music scene of Greenwich Village circa winter 1961 in the main, but to artistic failure on the whole, the movie was quiet, introverted, and ultimately too of itself to be recognized by the Academy in any meaningful way. Beyond a few token nominations for cinematography and sound mixing, Inside Llewyn Davis was completely shut out. The Best Picture category even had a tenth spot that was decidedly not exercised by old Oscar, which could be seen as the biggest snub of all to the Coens who have enjoyed award season adoration since 2007’s No Country for Old Men. This shouldn’t necessarily surprise anyone, except if we remember that the Academy miraculously applauded the insulated A Serious Man, which was anything but general audience friendly. One reason could again be that 2013 is more competitive, but this almost feels like the changing of the winds. Nobody has been as surprised by the awards pedigree the Coen Brothers have established as Joel and Ethan. Perhaps by making a movie so small and so specific, they knew that the affair might finally be over. No Country and True Grit were genuine crowd-pleasers. I suspect that until they make another such film, the Academy’s romance with the folksy duo is done for the foreseeable future.

Two intriguing subtle digs were films that stood the best chance in only a specific category or two: Monsters University and Blackfish. In the former’s case, it is almost a belated reproach of Pixar’s film slate as of late. Yes, last year Brave took home the prize for Best Animated Film to the chagrin of many critics (one’s writing right here), but there is no denying it was still a quality film and that Pixar is nearly synonymous with this category, having won seven out of the 12 years its existed. And while Pixar got the slight dig in 2011 when Cars 2 was ignored, Monsters University was well-received by nearly everyone, including us. Frozen, The Wind Rises, and Despicable Me 2 making the cut first is not only logical—it’s deserved. But The Croods andErnest & Celestine? I think Oscar is trying to send you a message, Pixar.
 
One whose message the AMPAS voting body SHOULD HAVE listened more readily to is Blackfish. Hands down one of the most gripping and accessible documentaries of the year, Blackfish'scontroversial exploration of the three deaths related to the Orca Tilikum at SeaWorld (as well as Sealand of the Pacific) feels not only like an oversight, but another example of culture ignoring this everyday tragedy committed in water parks around the world. The Oscars may not have cared, but if you have access to Netflix, watch this movie. Now.

Two films that were completely shut out are Lee Daniels’ The Butlerand Fruitvale Station. Two of the sleeper hits of summer, for the mainstream and critical circles respectively, both took very different and sharply contrasting views about race in America. Both were considered awards season hopefuls and both were completely ignored, including Oprah Winfrey’s turn as Gloria Gaines in Lee Daniels’ The Butler, which netted her a SAG and Golden Globe nomination. And the sad truth is that for the Academy, any political issue tends to coalesce around one movie, an unwritten rule that’s long been quietly enforced.
 
 
Which brings us to where the Oscar race appears to be headed. Namely 12 Years a Slave versus American Hustle. The two Best Picture winners at the Golden Globes are going to run headlong into one another for Best Picture, Best Director, and many of the acting categories as well at this year’s Oscars.

Yes, Gravity tied American Hustle for 10 nominations, the most of the year. It was a real coup for Alfonso Cuarón and Warner Brothers, the studio that fought for years to get that movie made with the Children of Men auteur (well at least Jeff Robinov did before being unceremoniously pushed out last June). And it is a direct credit to the panache of Gravity that it got in the “final five” listing from the Best Director category. Likely the Producers Guild recognition of Gravity, as well as Caurón picking up the DGA nomination two days before Oscar ballot deadlines, pushed it over the top for the AMPAS, which is notoriously apathetic for crowd-pleasing genre fare, no matter how many other accolades they receive (right, Alfred Htichcock, Stanley Kubrick, Christopher Nolan, and pre-Schindler’s List Steven Spielberg?). But Gravityhas showcased once more that physics and precedence does not apply to its staggering vision, which also earned star Sandra Bullock a Best Actress nomination.
 
…But Gravitywill still have to settle for “It was just an honor to be nominated” prestige. Despite Cuarón receiving the Golden Globe award for directing—as the HFPA is always more “populist” than its awarding peers—Gravity is still a science fiction film that relies more on a visceral experience of seamless visual effects that genuinely trick the eye into believing it’s witnessing a steadicam shot floating through orbit. Cuarón may have beat Greengrass out for the “thriller” spot once the Academy squeezed Alexander Payne in, but it is incredibly telling that Cuarón’s screenplay, co-written with his son Jonás Caurón, is absent in the Best Original Screenplay category. It was also ignored by WGA, but their strict guild rules always makes those nominations a bit of a one-off that is a poor barometer for Academy Award choices. But now that we’ve seen those said choices, the exclusion of Gravityindicates that the film is still primarily eye candy to a voting body that will shower it with technical awards on March 2. Seriously, it’s had Visual Effects locked up since at least the Toronto Film Festival. But for the “big” awards (Picture, Director, the acting selections), it will have to simply settle for today’s nods.

Conversely, American Hustleis in great shape to go head-to-head with the historical epic that is 12 Years a Slave. American Hustle has many of the hallmarks of a film ready to win the big prize: A talented movie star who is already an awards darling in the bombshell form of Jennifer Lawrence, the expected winner and frontrunner in her category of Best Supporting Actress; the charming “it’s kind of a true story, but happier” tone that sets it in a period that already was nostalgically noted in last year’s Argoand is even more romanticized now in Hustle; the four quadrant appeal of having an actor nominated in every major category of Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Supporting Actor, and Best Supporting Actress (Christian Bale, Adams, Bradley Cooper, and Lawrence, respectively); nominations for the vital categories of Screenplay and Director; and an Oscar campaign narrative that suggests, it is “his time.” The “he” in this case would be David O. Russell who has been repairing his bad public image following nightmare set stories on Three Kings and I Heart Huckabees, and who has become a reliable Academy stalwart, earning multiple nominations for directing, writing, and Best Picture for The Fighter(2010) and Silver Linings Playbook (2012). Also, not-so-coincidentally, both of those films featured all four of his leads in American Hustlein Academy-nominated performances, two of whom won (Bale for The Fighter, Lawrence for Silver Linings Playbook).
 
Plus with the slight edge of 10 nominations, all the political winds seem ready to push American Hustleover the finish line for Best Picture and Best Director. However, the last time Sony’s Columbia Pictures ran a Best Picture winning Oscar campaign was…with Gandhi in 1982.

Then again, Fox Searchlight isn’t exactly The Weinstein Company either when it comes to Best Picture winners. The strength of Fox’s 12 Years a Slave, besides arguably being the best movie of 2013, is that it’s also enjoying its own political winds. As the only remaining film in the race to deal with race in America after two strong contenders got snubbed, there will be increased attention paid to 12 Years a Slave. Beyond the politics, it stands as one of the most remarkable portraits of a historical period(!) infamous for its human suffering. And nobody has done suffering quite as captivatingly or horrifically as Steve McQueen, the director of Hunger and Shame. 12 Years is the most unflinching American studio (distributed) gaze into period atrocities since Spielberg’s Schindler’s List. It is strikingly unsentimental and methodical in its machinations of exploring human degradation, and it features two stunning performances by Chiwetel Ejiofor and Michael Fassbender, both of whom may be frontrunners, save for the star wattage of going method for Matthew McConaughey and Jared Leto in Dallas Buyers Club (there is also the school of thought that Leonardo DiCaprio will earn his overdue Oscar for The Wolf of Wall Street, but that remains unlikely given the controversy surrounding the picture’s lasciviousness).
 
At the moment, I would dare say that Hustle will win more awards between the two, but 12 Years will still take the top prizes. However, we’ll have a clearer picture of the dynamics once the Directors and Producers guilds award their favorites; SAG is almost certainly going to award American Hustlefor Best Ensemble.
 
There are other subjects to focus on as the Oscars telecast inches ever closer. Frozenall but has Best Animated Film and Best Original Song in the bag, while Gravitywill enjoy its own impressive sweep of technical awards. How much of a frontrunner is Cate Blanchett for Best Actress and can the competition catch up? Also, could Spike Jonze finally win an Oscar for his screenplay for Her? We’ll discuss this all and more in the coming weeks in our march to the red carpet!
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

Great analysis - I agree with almost everything. American Hustle is completely overrated - and where was the make-up up hair nomination for that one? Here is one studio head that is really not happy with the nominations:
http://mankabros.com/blogs/cha...

Russell Johnson, The Professor From Gilligan's Island, Dies

$
0
0
NewsTony Sokol1/16/2014 at 5:43PM

Russell Johnson also played on Twilight Zone, in classic SciFi films and wanted to be on Star Trek

Russell Johnson from Gilligan’s Island died at the age of 89. Russell’s Johnson’s wife Constance confirmed the press that the actor died Thursday morning of kidney failure, saying "He died at home, peaceful, in his sleep at 5:21 am today. (He was) a very brave guy who knew what he wanted, and he wanted to be at home."

Russell Johnson is best known for the role of Roy Hinkley on Gilligan’s Island. Roy Hinkley was best known as the Professor. He was the smart one, knew how to make a radio out of coconuts, but not how to fix the tiny ship that stranded the castaways on the tiny island. Gilligan’s Island starred Bob Denver as Gilligan, Alan Hale Jr as the Skipper, Jim Backus and Natalie Schafer as millionaire couple Thurston Howell III and Lovey, Tina Louise played Hollywood starlet Ginger Grant. Russell Johnson and Dawn Wells were known as either the Professor and Maryann or “and the rest” depending on which version of the theme song was playing.

Dawn Wells posted to Facebook, "My 2 favorite people are now gone. The professor past (sic) away this morning. My heart is broken. Russell was a true gentleman, a good father, a great friend..."

Gilligan Island ran for three years on CBS from September 26, 1964, to September 4, 1967. It was so popular three made-for-television movies came out of it Rescue From Gilligan's Island in 1978, The Castaways on Gilligan's Island from 1979 and The Harlem Globetrotters on Gilligan's Island starring Mission Impossible’s Martin Landau as the villain in 1981. Tina Louise was not always on board. Johnson almost had to show his chest when he auditioned for the Gilligan's Island role and made producer Sherwood Schwartz promise that whatever he said as a scientist made sense. Bob Denver, who also played Maynard on The Lives and Loves of Dobie Gillis, died in 2005. Alan Hale Jr., who was the son of famed Warner Bros. second banana, Alan Hale, died in 1990. Jim Backus, who was also Mr. Magoo and James Dean’s dad in Rebel Without a Cause, died in 1989.

Johnson was from northeastern Pennsylvania and served in World War II before he got into acting. He went Hollywood in 1952. Johnson was a friend of war hero turned actor Audie Murphy and appeared in the films Column South, Tumbleweed and Ride Clear of Diablo with him. Johnson appeared with George Raft in Loan Shark. Russell Johnson made several Science Fiction classics including It Came from Outer Space in 1953 and This Island Earth in 1955, Attack of the Crab Monsters in 1956, and The Space Children in 1958.  Johnson had a recurring role as Marshal Gib Scott on the western series, Black Saddle.

Johnson appeared in two Time Travel episodes on The Twilight Zone. In “Back There,” Johnson tried to save Abraham Lincoln and in "Execution" he played a, well, a professor.  He also played on Outer Limits.

Johnson told Starlog magazine that he always wanted to be on Star Trek. Johnson’s memoirs were called Here on Gilligan's Isle.

Russell Johnson leaves behind his wife and a daughter, Kim.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing

Disqus - noscript

It's amazing to realize, as these TV and movie stars pass away, how much they really meant to your childhood. Gilligan, It Came from Outer Space and The Twilight Zone he did were enough to make him a genuine favorite.

By the way, thanks for the info about Star Trek. Did not know that.

Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit review

$
0
0
ReviewDon Kaye1/16/2014 at 9:00PM

Chris Pine stars as Tom Clancy’s CIA analyst, who must solve the mystery of how he ended up in such a generic spy thriller.

The oddest thing about Jack Ryan, the CIA analyst/Cold War hero created by the late novelist Tom Clancy, is how he keeps getting younger with almost every movie he appears in. Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit, which serves as an origin story of sorts, finds him portrayed by Chris Pine, after previous turns by older actors Ben Affleck and Harrison Ford (he did start out younger, in the person of Alec Baldwin, in The Hunt for Red October before Ford took on the role). Pine is adequate enough in the role, but the tiresome studio fallback of showing us how he became the agent he is results in a bland espionage melodrama that lacks any real tension or depth.

Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit takes Ryan’s back history from the books and alters it to speed up his journey to the CIA, updating him into an economics student studying in London who immediately heads home to enlist after the September 11th attacks. Once in Afghanistan, he is badly injured in a helicopter crash and sent Stateside again, where his heroic actions and some unfinished school homework (or something like that) catch the eye of the film’s obligatory Wise Mentor (Kevin Costner).

Costner’s character, Harper, quickly recruits Ryan into the CIA and places him covertly in a major Wall Street firm to watch…lines on a computer (I’m guessing that since he’s covert, this is what the second half of the movie title means – it’s never really made clear). Ryan soon discovers some funny business going on in Russia – a nod, I suppose, to Clancy’s Cold War scenarios – and determines that a sinister plot is afoot to crash the U.S. economy and launch a terrorist attack at the same time. Nothing left to chance here, folks.

By the way, I’m not really ruining anything for you because this information is spelled out pretty much in the first half hour of the picture, which goes a long way toward draining it of any suspense it may have had. We also meet the bad guy, a powerful Russian businessman named Viktor Cherevin, played in thankfully understated fashion by Kenneth Branagh (who also directed). We say thankfully because we know Branagh’s work and he could have made this guy into Blofeld on steroids if he chose, but luckily decides to ease back on the throttle.

The rest of the movie follows all the standard spy paces, as Ryan heads to Moscow, survives one assassination attempt (the motivation for which is also rather murky) and finds himself on the fast track to a confrontation with Cherevin. Events are complicated by Ryan’s girlfriend and eventual wife Cathy (Keira Knightley), reimagined here as a thankless character who’s just in the movie so she can nag her boyfriend, contrive to get herself to Moscow and put herself in the path of danger, as if our poor young hero didn’t have enough on his plate.

But that’s the thing: for someone who has barely been in the field, who still suffers from his war injury and who has been behind a desk on Wall Street for 10 years, Ryan is also a full-on action hero. He kills the hell out of his first would-be assassin, stages an expert break-in at Cherevin’s offices (the one sequence that delivers some suspense) and gets behind the wheel of an SUV to  professionally speed through the traffic-clogged streets of Moscow on a high-speed chase to rescue Cathy from Cherevin’s clutches. The script wants to give us both a young, still-forming Ryan and an experienced, unflappable one at the same time.

Branagh, along with screenwriters David Koepp and Adam Cozad, never makes us feel how dangerous the stakes are – even that high speed chase ends up being pretty pointless and doesn’t do anything to move the plot forward. That seems to be the case with most of the action sequences, and it doesn’t help that Branagh directs them all like Paul Greengrass on a bad day, with choppy cuts, extreme close-ups and incoherent geography. There is absolutely nothing here we have not seen before, done better and with a lot more gravity.

And that’s the biggest problem with Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit: the terrorist plot, the economic machinations, the big business villain, the geopolitical intrigue and the hero/mentor dynamic all feel lifted out of previous films, including a couple of the earlier Ryan adventures. Aside from some details of Ryan’s early history, the film departs completely from Clancy’s novels, which get pretty wild and end up with Ryan becoming president and going to war with China. This is the second time that Paramount Pictures has tried rebooting Ryan after 2002’s The Sum of All Fears, but it’s clear that this latest attempt has made the character into literally a shadow of himself.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

4

Ride Along Review

$
0
0
ReviewDavid Crow1/16/2014 at 10:10PM

Kevin Hart tries frantically to grab the wheel, but Ride Along still feels like 48 Hours...and not the movie.

Sometimes concepts just sound better on paper.
 
That could be the epitaph written on every January’s frigid set of wide releases. Because let’s face it, if your movie is coming out in January, odds are something went wrong along the way. And when that something happens to a premise as naturally appealing as Ride Along, it’s a real cinematic waste of a detour.
 
Don’t believe me? Keep an eye on the box office this weekend; Ride Alongis about to topple a Tom Clancy espionage would-be blockbuster that features Chris Pine and Keira Knightley in its cast. And there’s a reason: the premise should be pretty sweet for a one-and-done laugher that combines the awkwardness of Meet the Parents with the buddy cop giggles of 48 Hours. Plus, Ice Cube. So, why is the result so unfunny?
 
Kevin Hart is Ben Barber, a cross between Gaylord Focker and Billy Ray Valentine, who one day decides that he will propose to Angela Payton (Tika Sumpter), the perfect girlfriend that only wants him to play video games slightly less. However, feeling the need to prove himself, Ben enrolls into the police academy to impress Angela’s older brother, Atlanta PD Det. James Payton (Ice Cube), in an effort to gain his blessing. Wanting to shake off this unassuming interloper before he becomes a permanent part of the family, James takes Ben on a “ride along” through the most asinine parts of being a day-to-day cop until they come across a very irregular situation: super gangster Omar, an insidious boogeyman that nobody’s ever met and lived to speak of. Hijinks, followed by boredom, ensues.
 
Despite spending almost the whole film in the passenger seat, Hart takes the wheel from almost the first frame. There is some by-the-numbers shootout and car chase in the movie’s opening moments, but little of the creativity and slyness found in director Tim Story’s earliest Barbershop gold (also with Ice Cube) is present here. Unfortunately, this is Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer vintage Story, which means all the action has a slap-and-dash sitcom shine to it, despite probably costing more than a whole season’s worth of Louie.
 
After the padded prologue kills five minutes, Hart is allowed to appear and quickly riff on his stand-up material, adjusted to the importance of video games, why kids should stay in school, and the size of his “hammer.” The half a dozen or so chuckles to be found in Ride Along are all largely thanks to Hart’s comic timing, particularly during a third act twist that anyone will predict if they pay attention to the cast credits at the top of the movie. Nonetheless, what works in a comedy cellar will not necessarily lend itself to creating a character worth investing in for even a meager 100 minutes. One of Hart’s comedy idols, Eddie Murphy, would have devoured this role 30 years ago and made it another unforgettable character filled with charisma, anger, and an effortless ability to enamor anyone within the Tristate area. Regrettably, Hart can best settle for when he gets to play off the height disparity between himself and a cameoing Laurence Fishburne.

But Hart never really had a chance to keep this star vehicle on the road when his wingman was passed out with his foot on the accelerator. Given the right role, Ice Cube can be hilarious. He was a standout in Tim Story’s 2002 Barbershop, and he was allowed to steal almost all of his scenes from Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum in 2012’s surprisingly bouncy 21 Jump Street. However, the deceivingly simple role of being the unimpressed badass who must learn to respect Hart by the 60-minute mark (it’s like clockwork) is as elusive to Ice Cube as any chemistry existing between the two stars. They’re in almost entirely different movies that share the faint similarity of being disastrously unfunny.
 
John Leguizamo and Bryan McGill are on hand to offer some background banter as a pair of detectives who have even less patience for Hart’s schtick than Ice Cube, but like the rest of the movie, they sit around waiting for a set-up so old that it would have been booed during Vaudeville. With punchlines this telegraphed, they land more like gentle passing breezes in the night.
 
Somewhere in the process of making a buddy cop comedy with the situational humor of a familial farce, Ride Along got way from a film that looks like it should run like a muscle car, and instead settled for a sputtering pace only fit for the golf course.
 
It ultimately does feel like 48 Hours. Unfortunately, I don't mean the movie.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
5

The 12 Potential Movie Franchise Starters of 2014

$
0
0
FeatureGabe Toro1/17/2014 at 7:29AM

It's a new year and a new time for Hollywood to attempt movie franchise building. We count down their 12 boldest attempts for 2014!

This past year, we saw sequels announced to films like World War Z, Now You See Me, Olympus Has Fallen, The Conjuring and a number of other original movies, spawning movie franchises likely or otherwise. It was a reminder that, while a number of franchises seem as predetermined as Harry Potter orSpider-Man, others seem to spring almost specifically from audience demand.
 
Ideally, Hollywood would promote franchises in perpetuity, but sometimes you’ve got to try something new, or in some cases new, but familiar. To that end, here are a few 2014 movies poised to spawn a series of sequels, and how likely that is to happen.
 

HERCULES
 
POWER PLAYERS: Dwayne Johnson, director Brett Ratner (X-Men: The Last Stand), executive producer Peter Berg (Friday Night Lights).
 
BASED UPON: Folklore, naturally, but specifically a graphic novel series called Hercules: The Thracian Wars from little-known publisher Radical Studios.
 
FRANCHISE BONAFIDES: Johnson has been seen as franchise Viagra in recent years, stepping into Fast Five, Journey 2: The Mysterious Island, and G.I. Joe: Retaliation to help those films register higher numbers than their predecessors. But Johnson hasn’t been able to launch a series on his own, and attempts like The Rundown (with Berg), Doom, and Race To Witch Mountain haven’t panned out. That being said, Johnson has been in five $100 million films since 2010, and has carved out enough of a niche as a major movie star that when audiences see him flexing his muscles as Hercules, it will simply make sense.
 
Ratner is a little bit of a wild-card. Ratner famously ruled over the Rush Hour films, and they went out strong with a third installment that made $258 million worldwide. Almost eight years later, Ratner is responsible for the most successful in the X-Men series as well, though it’s certainly telling that they’ve never invited him back for another go-round. His last film was the high-profile Tower Heist, which collected $152 million worldwide. You can’t argue with Ratner’s hitmaker status, but the consensus seems to be that he makes substandard films that even diehard fans are dispassionate about.
 
 
Then again, Hercules is a pretty regular presence on-screen, not only providing the subject matter for 25 films, but starring in two films this year, the first being the lower-budgeted The Legend of Hercules. While that picture is more of a quick-hit release designed to profit off foreign pre-sales, it could still be fresh in audience’s minds by the time Johnson’s version hits theaters. Both films also attempt a more realistic angle and could easily carry some of the same attributes to audiences. However, given that Ratner is one of the more generic filmmakers in the business, Hercules could still easily be another stillborn Dwayne Johnson offering.
 
COMPETITION: Hercules currently has a pretty clear path to success, opening on July 25, a week after Jupiter Ascending, and a week before Guardians Of The Galaxy, two of the riskier summer blockbusters in recent memory. There’s a very good chance someone could see this as primo real estate and challenge Hercules with a release date shift. If it’s a proven brand, there’s a very good chance Johnson could be screaming “Uncle.”
 
LONGEVITY: If the film is a hit, the affable Johnson could easily play Hercules forever: there’s not exactly a shortage of myths to utilize.
 

GODZILLA
 
POWER PLAYERS: None, really.
 
BASED UPON: The latest in a long legacy of Godzilla movies with rumor spreading that it shares DNA with the earlier films more than Roland Emmerich’s 1998 version.
 
FRANCHISE BONAFIDES: Warner Bros. is hoping the Godzilla brand can carry the name recognition on its own, particularly given that the cast is relatively low-wattage. Booking Aaron Taylor-Johnson for the lead role was likely in the hopes that Kick-Ass 2 would cement his visibility, and while he’s got a tidy role in Avengers: Age Of Ultron, he remains mostly anonymous to filmgoers; the same goes for co-star Elizabeth Olsen. The biggest name in the cast might ultimately be Breaking Bad star Bryan Cranston.
 
The coup was landing young director Gareth Edwards, who previously helmed Monsters. That low budget sci-fi story is more notable for its reportedly miniscule budget than for its content, but it’s a not-bad chiller that understood the scope of its creatures as well as the power of a practical boogeyman or two. Edwards was nabbed primarily because he made a couple of big-screen thrills sing in a relatively modest character piece, though the WB is throwing a massive $160 million budget at this film, so they’re expecting a much stronger reception.
 
COMPETITION: The summer of 2014 is filled with less established brands than recent memory, and Godzilla has a sweet slot on May 16, matched up against the modest counterprogramming of Million Dollar Arm. It’s coming a week before X-Men: Days Of Future Past, so a big opening weekend is necessary, but how fresh is the intolerable 1998 version in viewers’ minds? Batman Begins debuted in 2005 to an underwhelming $48 million, which was mostly credited to the toxic reputation of Batman & Robin; the hope is that Godzilla won’t undergo the same fate. Still, the big summer opener is the vulnerable-looking The Amazing Spider-Man 2, followed by the lower-budgeted Neighbors a week later. Godzillais actually in a primo position to be one of the season’s stronger performers.
 
LONGEVITY: This is a massively expensive film: are Edwards and company thinking series? The Toho films have an extensive mythology, but Edwards’ hyper-real approach, and the pricetag involved, likely prevents studios from adapting more outlandish (and enjoyable!) entries like Destroy All Monsters.
 

ROBOCOP
 
POWER PLAYERS: None, save for the supporting presence/lucky charm that is Samuel L. Jackson, the actor with the highest-grossing resume in cinema history.
 
BASED UPON: The earlier MGM trilogy beginning in 1987 that resulted in steeply declining grosses, the Nadir being the PG-13-rated RoboCop 3 that this new film closer resembles.
 
FRANCHISE BONAFIDES: MGM and Sony have been trying to get this movie off the ground for a very long time, banking that a fresh PG-13 (grumble, grumble) perspective and 3D was enough to get audiences in theaters. Now that the trailers have established this is basically a sleeker, more action-heavy approach, the hope is that audiences don’t remember the original films, and that new leading man Joel Kinnaman is a fresh face that ticket buyers will embrace.
 
The cast for this entry has been stacked with a number of familiar faces, but no real leading men or women, unless you count Jay Baruchel (and you don’t, do you?). Jose Padilha is also pretty green in the director’s chair, making his English-language debut after helming the admittedly pretty-awesome Elite Squad movies in Brazil. Whatever the case, they’re not banking on a core audience coming back to this RoboCop 27 years after the original: though a hit on VHS, RoboCop's  $53 million gross would only translate to $109 million today, and the budget on the new film is $120 million.
 
COMPETITION: RoboCop is going to target males on February 12, which leaves a female demographic ripe for the picking in the lower-budgeted Vampire Academy. Meanwhile, the big budget Winter’s Tale is something of an oddity and could also siphon viewers as well. This is a week after The Lego Movie and Monuments Men, leaving young males all to RoboCop. But if all those movies hit, there’s going to be very little room for the robo-remake to carve out a niche with general crowds that would make the $120 million money well spent. RoboCop is going to need muscular reviews and word-of-mouth to get out of what looks like the most competitive early February slate in the last few years.
 
LONGEVITY: The secret gag in the original RoboCop is that OCP’s decision to re-animate Officer Alex Murphy is appalling and inhumane: the very seed of the idea suggests sequels are a terrible idea, and the earlier RoboCop 2earns points for acknowledging the ultimate pointlessness of the endeavor. The Frank Miller-penned RoboCop 3seemed to miss this point, effectively killing the series dead, and it seems likely that the same thing could happen here.
 

I, FRANKENSTEIN
 
POWER PLAYERS: Star Aaron Eckhart (The Dark Knight), writer-director Stuart Beattie (G.I. Joe: The Rise Of Cobra), writer Kevin Grevioux (Underworld).
 
BASED UPON: Obviously the Mary Shelly novel, though this particular narrative comes courtesy of a comic book penned by Grevioux.
 
FRANCHISE BONAFIDES: Grevioux’s graphic novel puts a fresh (or “fresh”) spin on the Frankenstein mythos by making the monster into a good guy. Lionsgate is also clearly aiming for the Underworlddemographic by recruiting that series’ chief architect. Plus, it’s got the same late period release date as those films, suggesting that those seeking a monster mash-up fix have already made plans for this gaudy-looking adventure.
 
Beattie made his directorial debut with Tomorrow, When The War Began a couple of years ago, an Australian action film that had the spectacle and sheen of a major American blockbuster. But as a screenwriter, he’s been involved in films as diverse as Pirates Of The Caribbean: The Curse Of The Black Pearl, Collateral, and Australia, so he’s likely got a bit more blockbuster experience than Padilha and Edwards. And Eckhart, who led the modestly-sized blockbuster Battle: Los Angeles, still has some juice with audiences after his standout role in The Dark Knight.
 
COMPETITION: The Underworld films are popular, but they’ve never had to take advantage of a $68 million budget like I, Frankenstein, so it might be a tough climb. It has the January 24 slot all to itself, but it will be coming a week after Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit and Ride Along. The monster-mash storyline will distinguish itself from those two, but the picture’s going to have to break out from its narrow young-male niche to catch on. This is probably more likely if Ryan flops, which is certainly possible, but both films could very possibly cannibalize each other.
 
LONGEVITY: These guys milked Underworldlike a row of cows, so why couldn’t they do the same with Frankenstein? Eckhart’s not the youngest action star, but hey: prequels?
 

JACK RYAN: SHADOW RECRUIT
 
POWER PLAYERS: Director Kenneth Branagh (Thor), stars Chris Pine (Star Trek) and Kevin Costner.
 
BASED UPON: The best-selling Tom Clancy novels and four successful films.
 
FRANCHISE BONAFIDES: Jack Ryan is a name with a strong cinematic lineage, the character having carried four previous blockbusters, though none in the last decade. Those were star vehicles, more or less, with Alec Baldwin in the role for The Hunt For Red October, Harrison Ford in the part for Patriot Games and Clear And Present Danger (and, unofficially, Air Force One), and Ben Affleck in The Sum Of All Fears. The only thing that kept producers from not following Fears with a Red Rabbit adaptation, as discussed, was Affleck’s precipitous fall from the A-List. The late Tom Clancy’s Ryan bestsellers have flown off the shelves for decades now, and Paramount has always been keen on kick-starting this series, with Clancy’s recent passing giving this latest effort a sense of urgency in the marketplace.
 
 
Paramount is treating this less like the older Ryan adventures and more like a typical franchise. Putting Ryan front and center in the title emphasizes this is an origin, placing the character over the actual story, which was not the case with previous Ryan films. They’ve also involved Kevin Costner in a role as a shadowy overseer, a part that the studio has openly claimed could resurface in a later Clancy adaptation centered around black-ops character John Clark, or even in Costner’s own film. Completing the Marvel-like world-building, the studio nabbed Thor director Kenneth Branagh to do to the CIA what he did for Asgard, while spotlighting Pine, a leading man who has yet to fully take advantage of his position as this generation’s James T. Kirk.
 
COMPETITION: It was not a good look when Paramount favored The Wolf Of Wall Street against this film, shuttling it from a primo Christmas release date into the dregs of January. When a film is released during the holidays, it’s one of many options for massive friends and families going to the movies together. By January 17, those groups have thinned considerably, and it’s hard to see too many of them selecting this over the broad Kevin Hart-Ice Cube comedy Ride Along. Paramount played this wrong, and it looks like Jack Ryan is about to go back in the cupboard.
 
 
LONGEVITY: Paramount is seeding the film with several potential hooks for spin-offs, and the various Clancy novels suggest even if the film isn’t a hit, Ryan could resurface again in the next decade.
 

TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES
 
POWER PLAYERS: Director Jonathan Liebesman (Wrath of The Titans), producer Michael Bay (Transformers).
 
BASED UPON: The successful comic book line that spawned a hit animated series, a live-action trilogy, and a 2007 animated big-screen adventure.
 
FRANCHISE BONAFIDES: This is the first effort for the Heroes In A Half-Shell since 2007’s animated TMNT, a middling effort that led to the property being sold to Nickelodeon. The network’s weight is behind this latest version, part of a multimedia relaunch of the characters that comes complete with new toys and television shows. So far, the results have been inconclusive, but if the film flounders, then the entire gamble might not have been worth it.
 
Bay’s name brings a certain tacky prestige, given that he’s responsible for the billion dollar Transformers series.  But he’s only a producer, and this is coming from his Platinum Dunes shingle, a company that has made their bones on cheaply remaking horror classics to look like beer commercials that, inexplicably, fail to launch franchises. Freddy, Jason, and Leatherface had 22 installments between them over the years before landing at Platinum Dunes. After big opening weekends, the Bay-produced A Nightmare On Elm Street and Friday The 13th tailed off, and neither has produced a sequel. Leatherface, to his credit, at least made it to Platinum Dunes’ Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning, the second and last Chainsaw film from Platinum Dunes before Twisted Pictures bought the rights.
 
 
The Beginning grossed less than half of its predecessor, and it was directed by Liebesman, who is behind this latest Ninja Turtles adaptation. Nice job failing upwards, dude: he also directed the less-successful sequel Wrath Of The Titans and was behind the failed franchise-starter Battle: Los Angeles. He won’t matter if the material produces a couple of good trailers and marketing materials, but early fan backlash suggested the material was being taken far from its roots with some rumors indicating a change of the famously mutant turtles into space aliens. Regardless, the Turtles are the concept, and they’ve maintained enough visibility to get the kids excited for another installment.
 
COMPETITION: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles opens up against Lucy, a zombie comedy with Arnold Schwarzenegger, which… wait, did I just type that? Turtles will likely open big unless its ad campaign is a disaster (always a possibility), but will it hold on? It comes a week after Guardians Of The Galaxy and right before The Expendables 3, so the issue is whether the movie targets kids or teens and baby boomers. If it’s the latter, August is heavy on male-centric programming, so a huge second week fall could kill future Turtles movies.
 
LONGEVITY: The Turtles were originally created as a joke, riffing on the grim-and-gritty aesthetic of 1980s comics, before becoming something a bit more female friendly. Regardless, the universe that was soon built on the backs of Eastman and Laird’s original conception of the characters is so impressively dense that the earlier trilogy didn’t even touch upon it. There’s more than enough material for a couple of sequels.
 

JUPITER ASCENDING
 
POWER PLAYERS: The Wachowski siblings (The Matrix), Channing Tatum (21 Jump Street), Mila Kunis (Oz: The Great And Powerful, Ted)
 
BASED UPON: An original pitch by the Wachowskis.
 
FRANCHISE BONAFIDES: The Wachowskis, God bless them, have lost people a lot of money over the past decade. Warner Bros. have kept them in-house since the success of The Matrix series, and they’ve repaid this loyalty with the type of expensive failures (Speed Racer, Cloud Atlas) that get people banned from the industry. This is basically the Wachowskis pitching another Matrix, an elaborate sci-fi fantasy that’s meant to be the first of a trilogy.
 
On one level, they’re smart to go with Tatum and Kunis, two well-known and well-liked actors. Tatum’s massive 2012 (21 Jump Street, Magic Mike) is still fresh on people’s minds, and he’ll be coming off 22 Jump Street. Of course, this is a hard sci-fi film, and Tatum sports some ridiculous facial hair as a character that’s apparently “part wolf.” Tatum’s not yet a good-enough actor that he can obscure his looks and people will still want to see him. And Kunis has high visibility, but not necessarily high bankability: the fact that she’s the title character is likely a test of her Q-rating.
 
COMPETITION: Jupiter Ascending hits July 18, against the not-very-anticipated Planes: Fire And Rescue, which is targeting a whole different demographic. The summer is nicely spaced out, to the point where it’s surprising no one tried out a more proven commodity against this film. It arrives a week after Dawn Of The Planet of the Apes, though, which might be an issue.
 
LONGEVITY: The trilogy plan is in place, so Wachowski and the WB are clearly thinking ahead. Beyond that, we’d have to know more about the plot for this sci-fi gumbo.
 

NEED FOR SPEED
 
POWER PLAYERS: None.
 
BASED UPON: A popular line of off-road racing games.
 
FRANCHISE BONAFIDES: The Need For Speed games were never known for their stories or drama. The studio has compensated by cutting trailers and early footage that emphasize a whole lotta’ car crashes for the key young male demographic. They’re also pushing this with Aaron Paul in the lead: his fame comes exclusively from his association with Breaking Bad, a pop culture sensation that now, let’s face it, is just another basic cable hit that’s no longer on the air. Casting Kid Cudi in a supporting role is another demographic grab, not unlike the rappers that were cast in the Fast and Furious movies, an obvious model. But calling him Scott Mescudi in the ad campaign seems like an overestimation, given that the music stars in the Furious films kept their stage names and had considerably higher profiles.
 
COMPETITION:Need For Speed is a candidate to grab a Super Bowl TV spot, which would give the film a big boost ahead of its March 14 release. It opens against Tyler Perry’s The Single Moms Club, which will serve an entirely different demographic. But it also opens against Focus’ bawdy indie comedy Bad Words with Jason Bateman. That one made the festival circuit, but now that Focus is being run by the FIlmDistrict guys, they could be taking a broader strategy in releasing their films: Bad Words might end up serving a similar demographic, limiting the Need For Speed audience.
 
LONGEVITY: They made seven Fast and the Furious movies based off a single magazine article about underground racing.  If Need For Speedhits, no one’s going to have a problem replicating the appeal.
 

DIVERGENT
 
POWER PLAYERS: Shailene Woodley, director Neil Burger (The Illusionist), Kate Winslet
 
BASED UPON: A best-selling series of YA novels.
 
FRANCHISE BONAFIDES: It doesn’t even seem like you need to buy a ticket for this film to get a sequel made: confidence is high enough that the studio is already marching ahead with dates for follow-ups, claiming that director Burger can’t even return, because he’ll still be finishing the first film. For their sake, they’d better know what they’re doing or this is going to be another Mortal Instruments situation where everyone goes all-in on a sequel that investors refuse to bankroll. Release dates are set, and pre-production marches on for these sequels, and the only thing on anyone’s mind appears to be speed.
 
Woodley is very close to being The Next Big Thing: she was long rumored to garner an Academy Award nomination for The Descendants, but that didn’t happen. And her supporting role in The Spectacular Now won her fans, but the film wasn’t the breakout hit people expected. She could have owned this summer as well: she has a role in the upcoming The Fault In Our Stars but was cut from The Amazing Spider-Man 2. Her big shot should be in this film with an ad campaign that’s fully invested into turning her into the next Jennifer Lawrence. Fortunately, she’s just as frisky on the interview circuit, which helps immeasurably. Burger and Winslet have no real franchise experience, but Winslet remains a name that can get adult audience-goers into seats in the right project. And Burger dabbled in an Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune adaptation, suggesting a larger interest in franchise world-building.
 
COMPETITION: March 21 sees Divergent open against Muppets Most Wanted, which could be bad for both given the similar demographics. But frankly, if the Muppetsfilm doesn’t supercharge their marketing campaign soon, Divergent could blow it out of the water. The mega-budgeted Noah opens a week later, but that’s currently the kind of question mark that suggests Divergent won’t lose a chunk of its audience.
 
LONGEVITY: The new world of post-Harry Potter franchise building in regards to these fantasy series is to quickly schedule the films based on these books, and to split the final novel into a supersized two-parter. It works for finite stories, but it also means that, within six or seven years, a successful Divergent series might already be forgotten.
 

THE LEGO MOVIE
 
POWER PLAYERS: Phil Lord and Chris Miller (Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs)
 
BASED UPON: A branding opportunity to push Lego products. I mean, come on.
 
FRANCHISE BONAFIDES: This is a veritable branding orgy, since Legos have been a hit in almost every household since men rode dinosaurs to work. The intention was to push the brand and its various offshoots (the film features endless licensed characters in Lego form), but Lord and Miller are also the mischievous jokers behind 21 Jump Street. There’s a massive cast attached to this film, but the real selling points are the Legos themselves. The question is whether the slapstick is enough to distinguish this from the endless straight-to-DVD Lego ‘toons that are pushed onto kids every few months. We’ll guess yes.
 
COMPETITION: The Lego Movie opens in a relatively underserved period for kids’ films, and, sharing a release date with the older-skewing The Monuments Men, it’s guaranteed to open huge.
 
LONGEVITY: Legos are universal. They’ll make 70 sequels.
 

GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY
 
POWER PLAYERS: Marvel producer Kevin Feige.
 
BASED UPON: An inconsistently successful comic line that has fluctuated in-and-out of circulation for Marvel since the ‘70s.
 
FRANCHISE BONAFIDES: The ad campaign hasn’t kicked in for this odd genre mash-up, but Disney hopes that Marvel and outer-space are good enough hooks for now. The material is unusual: a series of somewhat-familiar faces (Chris Pratt, Zoe Saldana), really familiar voices (Bradley Cooper, Vin Diesel), and unrecognizable famous faces (Benicio Del Toro, John C. Reilly) all star in a big, wacky space story that plays like a jokey Star Wars. The narrative ties into the other Marvel films (as was teased in the end credits sequence for Thor: The Dark World), but not too directly, as it appears no Avenger will be showing up in this film. For those craving continuity, the angle is that Guardians sets various things in motion involving big bad Thanos, who was seen in the end credits to The Avengers but apparently will not figure into Avengers: Age Of Ultron. So get ready to witness set-ups for plot points that won’t pay off for another couple of years!
 
COMPETITION: Many claim Marvel was secretly sweating as Guardians was set to open against Fifty Shades Of Grey, a film with a much larger fanbase than the small crowd that follows the Guardians comics. But Grey has left Guardians all by its lonesome, where it has to tango with the second weekend of Hercules. It also gets a full weekend to itself before Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. It’s very likely that Guardians is the last big hit of the summer.
 
LONGEVITY: Guardians seems like it’s massively broadening the Marvel universe, but the studio can only release so many new films. Thor and Iron Man seem like Marvel foundational pieces, but Guardians could end up being just a brick in the massive Marvel puzzle. They can afford to take a risk, and they can also afford to take a bath on an underperforming film. This could be so successful that they’re forced to try a sequel, but if not, it’s likely to serve as a backdoor into yet another new Marvel series.
 

THE EQUALIZER
 
POWER PLAYERS: Denzel Washington, director Antoine Fuqua (Training Day), Chloe Grace Moretz (Kick-Ass).
 
BASED UPON: Before becoming an amusing punchline in The Wolf Of Wall Street, The Equalizer was a hit series with an unmistakably-awesome Stuart Copeland theme.
 
FRANCHISE BONAFIDES: The project has been in development for a very long time. Its basic premise (a badass problem-solver listed in the phone book) suited to any number of leading men. For a while, Russell Crowe was slated to do the deed for director Paul Haggis, but the re-teaming of Washington and Fuqua seems more viable, particularly considering Fuqua is responsible for Washington winning his second Oscar for Training Day.
 
Washington has become one of the biggest stars in Hollywood despite no franchises to his name. It appears to be an actual effort: he’s recently turned down roles in Fast and Furious 7 and, if rumors are true, the upcoming Batman Vs. Superman. Some suggested that 2 Guns would spawn the first Washington-led sequel, but that film was a rare underperformer for Denzel. Now, he gives it a shot with a common collaborator in Fuqua, who’s coming off the sequel-generating Olympus Has Fallen. Both men assure this will be a franchise-level event (Training Day will likely be prominent in the ad campaign), and it’s likely to be one of the bigger attractions of the early fall, particularly for Washington’s usually-dependable fanbase.
 
COMPETITION: This opens up against the children’s film The Boxtrolls, but not only is that film after an entirely different demographic, but a children’s film seems like it would have limited appeal opening just as kids have gotten settled into the new school year. David Fincher’s Gone Girl opens the week after, but it’s likely going to be battling with a still-strong The Equalizer for the same audience.
 
LONGEVITY: Washington’s been a nomad of a leading man, mostly because his films are cheap enough to become solidly profitable, though often less than memorable. He brings in adult males, however, and there aren’t many franchises for them. This could fill that void, even if it’s just junky action, which it likely will be.
 
So there is our list our list of 12 potential movie franchise starters for the coming year (and weekend!). Which do you think will sizzle and which will fizzle? Let us know in the comments section below!
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Devil’s Due review

$
0
0
ReviewRyan Lambie1/17/2014 at 7:32AM

The occult horror Devil’s Due mixes parenthood with found footage. Here’s Ryan’s review...

Arriving like the satanic offspring of Rosemary’s Baby and Paranormal Activity comes Devil’s Due, a found-footage movie with a diabolical body horror twist. Prenatal Activity, perhaps?

All-American young couple Zach (Zach Gilford) and Sam (Allison Miller) enjoy the perfect white wedding before embarking on a sun-drenched honeymoon in the Dominican Republic. Shortly after the newlyweds return from their vacation, Sam discovers that she’s fallen unexpectedly pregnant, and as the bump in her belly grows, her husband begins to suspect that the fruit of Sam’s womb might have a distinctly unholy origin.

There’s the seed of a great idea in Devil’s Due, directed by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett (part of the horror filmmaking team collectively known as Radio Silence, who created the Halloween segment of the horror anthology feature, V/H/S).

The first half of the story is as much about the upheaval and uncertainty that surrounds pregnancy as the coming baby itself, from the pressures of unexpectedly having to put careers on hold to the more primal fears of physical change and potential complications in childbirth.

Gilford and Miller make for an engaging and natural leading couple, and the initial build-up of suspense is well handled - the requisite found-footage jump-scares notwithstanding. But both the title and the opening slab of text - an apocalyptic passage from the New Testament - make the nature of what's growing in Sam’s womb plain, and Devil’s Due fails to inject many surprises along the way.

By now, we’re all used to the trappings of the found-footage movie, and Devil’s Due makes only the most cursory attempts to explain who’s recording what and why; initially, Zach tells us that he’s capturing the events for posterity, but before long, the movie’s cutting to supermarket CCTV cameras, and later, to cameras that theoretically shouldn’t exist at all.

In its defense, Devil’s Due comes up with a relatively original explanation for the cameras rigged up around the couple’s house, but in this instance, the found-footage format has the curious effect of deadening the impact of the scares rather than heightening them.

Now, this could be because your humble writer has become inured to the trappings of the grainy-camera format, but it’s equally likely that the movie simply fails to catch its audience off guard often enough to make an impact. The directors pull just about every found-footage trick out of the bag in the attempt to evoke a sense of fear - there are handheld cameras bathing the screen with green-hued night vision, cameras that literally fly in the face of the rules of physics, and ominous, fixed cameras where things loom in and out of a static frame. Yet the insistence in using portentous rumbles and little glitches of electrical interference merely signpost the incoming scares, while the familiar beat of the movie’s rhythm makes it too predictable to be truly effective.

The reliance on tried-and-trusted Paranormal Activity-style shocks is all the more disappointing when they’re compared to the sequences that are more original - there are routine hospital appointments which hint at ominous future events, and sudden and blackly funny cravings in supermarket meat aisles, which are all extremely effective. There’s a sense that the filmmakers have really enjoyed mining the common experiences parents share during pregnancy, and perhaps a hint of the peculiarly male sense of helplessness as their loved one's body morphs and shifts as the baby within them grows. Had Devil’s Due concentrated more on scenes such as these, it could have grown into something more than a by-the-numbers genre flick with flashes of originality.

As it is, Devil’s Due is a found-footage horror that is pregnant with potential, yet in the final analysis, ultimately fails to deliver.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

New Justice League: War Clip: Wonder Woman Takes Center Stage

$
0
0
TrailerDen Of Geek1/17/2014 at 10:34AM

Watch Wonder Woman take care of business in this latest clip from the Justice League: War animated movie!

The latest clip from Justice League: War, the first DC animated movie to adopt the style and tone of DC's New 52 universe, is here! In a scene straight out of the comic book roots of the story (Geoff Johns and Jim Lee's New 52 kickstarting Justice League: Origin), Wonder Woman (voiced by Michelle Monaghan) passes up a delicious ice cream cone to absolutely demolish a horde of Darkseid's parademons. See for yourself!

Justice League: War is directed by Jay Oliva (Young JusticeJustice League: The Flashpoint Paradox) and will be released on February 4th. You can see previous clips from Justice League: War here and here.

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Reaper Creators Heading Up Marvel/ABC’s Agent Carter Series

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/17/2014 at 1:46PM

The creators of Reaper are quietly headed over to ABC to write and executive produce a new Agent Carter drama!

In news that we have all kind of sensed was coming after the Marvel One-Shot “Agent Carter” was simply announced for the Iron Man 3 Blu-ray, it appears that Marvel is preparing to make Hayley Atwell’s Peggy Carter the star of her own TV series.
 
In news freshly being reported by Deadline, the creators of Reaper, Tara Butters and Michele Fazekas, have been discretely scuttled to the officially unspecified Marvel drama at ABC. However, Deadline is openly reporting that it is known to be inspired by the “Agent Carter” short released last fall for home release and that Carter will feature prominently.
 
This is not the biggest shock, as Atwell has coyly admitted that she would jump at the opportunity to play the part previously. Saying in October, “I love the Marvel lot, they’re really great people to work with, so it would be nice to go back and work with them again. I’d definitely do it.”
 
Peggy Carter was the love interest of Steve Rogers in the 2011 franchise starter Captain America: The First Avenger. After her boyfriend was frozen in time—and only thawed out in 2012—it appeared likely that we had seen the last of the British OSS officer from her World War II setting. But apparently it is only the beginning with Butters and Fazekas writing and executive producing the project.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Lady Sif Teaming With The Agents of SHIELD

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/17/2014 at 3:36PM

Jaime Alexander's Lady Sif will be making an appearance in an upcoming episode of Agents of SHIELD.

And the big to small screen crossovers keep on coming! After already seeing Samuel L. Jackson as Nick Fury and Cobie Smulders as Maria Hill guest spot on ABC’s Agents of SHIELD, Jaime Alexander’s Lady Sif is now also making an appearance with Coulson, Skye, and the rest of the gang.
 
During the TCA press tour earlier in the day, ABC President Paul Lee revealed to the press that the Asgardian goddess would be making a bow on the hit series. A role that Lee ensured would be intergal to the episode. Lee also promised that the clairvoyant of the group shall be revealed in the back half of a “very cool” first season.
 
Alexander has appeared twice before as the Lady Sif in both Thor(2011) and Thor: The Dark World (2013), in which she depicted the courageous, unofficial fourth point on the Warriors Three, as they did battle with Loki and other nasty villains. Alexander was also reportedly considered for the role of Wonder Woman in the Batman vs. Superman movie.
 
Agents of SHIELD returns February 4 on ABC.
 
SOURCE: EW
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek.

Man Of Steel sequel Batman vs. Superman Release Date Pushed Back to 2016

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/17/2014 at 8:55PM

The Batman vs. Superman movie, which may or may not be a Justice League movie, has a new release date.

Originally scheduled for release on July 17, 2015, the untitled Man of Steel sequel, generally known as Batman vs. Superman has been pushed back nearly a year, to May 6, 2016. The film, which stars Henry Cavill as Superman, Ben Affleck as Batman, and Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman has been the subject of all manner of rumors in recent months, including those dealing with an ever-expanding cast of DC Universe characters. Once Wonder Woman came into the picture, the idea that this might be a stealth Justice League movie became impossible to ignore.

In a statement, Warner Bros. president of domestic distribution Dan Fellman had this to say:

“We are happy to take advantage of these coveted summer dates, which are perfect for two of our biggest tentpole releases. We share the fans’ excitement to see DC Comics’ most popular figures, Superman and Batman, together on the big screen for the first time, which will now be arriving in theatres in May 2016. Peter Pan has delighted people of every generation for more than a century, so we are thrilled to bring him back to the screen next summer for today’s moviegoers.”

The Peter Pan movie that Mr. Fellman is referring to is Joe Wright's live-action version of the story, which will now occupy Batman vs. Superman's July 2015 release date. It's worth noting that the new date chosen for the release of Man of Steel 2 is May 6, 2016...which is currently being held for an as-yet-untitled Marvel Studios movie. Marvel has taken charge of those early May blockbuster releases since 2008's Iron Man, so this could be seen as an aggressive move by Warner Bros. Or, perhaps, they took a look at an already crowded-with-capes Summer 2015 release schedule (which currently includes Avengers: Age of UltronAnt-Man, and Fantastic Four), and decided the film would do better the following year.

It does raise questions, both about the film's actual identity (nobody ever really believed they were calling this Batman vs. Superman did they?) and its role as a lynchpin of a newly-minted DC Cinematic Universe, and about how quickly it all seemed to come together in the first place. If this is, in fact, a much larger film than we've been led to believe, the extra time will certainly benefit it. But does this mean that the initial concept for this movie, originally announced as taking cues from the classic Dark Knight Returns comic, has been scrapped? Were studio execs unhappy with the direction on the page from David S. Goyer and Zack Snyder (with Argo's Chris Terrio recently coming on to do a rewrite), and forcing further rewrites before principal photography is scheduled to begin in February? We'll know more soon enough, and when we do, so will you.

A hat-tip to THR for putting us on to this! 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

This one has all the hallmarks of a total bust, and if it somehow succeeds even as well as Man of Steel, I'll be very, very surprised.

Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>