Top 10 Films of 2013
Joel Silver reveals his plans for the ending of Watchmen
Joel Silver once had Terry Gilliam attached to direct an adaptation of Watchmen, and he's revealed their planned take on the ending.
Producer Joel Silver has decided to speak about Zack Snyder's adaptation of Watchmen, with his own interest being that he was for a time attached to the project and had Terry Gilliam lined up to direct. Rather unsurprisingly he thinks his version would have been better. He told Coming Soon that "it was a much, much better movie. I mean Zack came at it in the right way but was too much of a slave to the material. I was trying to get it back from the studio at that point".
Which begs the question as to just what Silver would have done differently. Turns out, his third act would have differed quite a lot. "Instead of the whole notion of the intergalactic thing, which was too hard and too silly, what he did was maintain that the existence of Doctor Manhattan had changed the whole balance of the world economy, the world political structure". He continued, saying "he had the Ozymandias character convince Doctor Manhattan to go back and stop himself from being created, so there never would be a Doctor Manhattan character. And in the vortex that was created after that occurred, these characters from Watchmen only became characters in a comic book".
It's different, certainly, but not necessarily the improvement over Snyder's ending that Silver was seemingly seeking. Leave your own thoughts on it in the comments...
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Disqus - noscript
Sounds quite worse actually. Boring, silly and sounds reminiscent of one of those Simpsons Halloween Episodes.
IMO--That would have been a VERY BAD ending. Watchemen is an Iconic , groundbreaking piece of work & the essence of the ending(no giant alien squid, aside) WAS preserved by Snyder's work--the world was tricked into peace & yet----the journal that told the truth was in the hands of the New Republic publishers, leaving the question of will it be revealed & tagging onto Dr Manhattan's comment to Veidt that was given to SS in the movie: "Nothing EVER ends".
Will the directors of Frozen take our Oscar challenge?
If Frozen wins an Oscar this weekend, and the word 'pineapple' comes up, er, this is why...
It's Friday, so we're allowed to post something like this. A week or two back, we got to sit down again with Chris Buck and Jennifer Lee, the directors (and in Lee's case, the writer as well) of Disney's Frozen.
At the time, the pair had just won the BAFTA for Best Animated Movie, and they're up for the same gong at the Oscars this weekend. So we asked them: if they win, have they been challenged to get a random word into their acceptance speech?
"Random word?", said Lee. "No! That's so funny". Sensing that this conversation had not been shut down, we pursued this. Chris Buck confirmed too that he had not been asked this before.
"It has to be utterly bizarre. Pineapple, or something like that. If you win, and one of you gets 'pineapple' into your speech...", we ventured. "What do we get?", grinned Chris.
We hadn't thought this through. "Er, a few quid to Children In Need? A Den Of Geek mug?"
They grinned at the thought of this. Those mugs are rare, after all. But will they do it? They left us on a cliffhanger there. But should Lee and Buck win Oscar gold over the weekend, and should they randomly say 'pineapple' in their speech, you now know why.
The full interview, where we asked grown-up questions, will be live in a few weeks...
Frozenthe movie is up for preorder on DVD and Blu-ray now.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Minecraft movie in the works at WB
It's official, there is a Minecraft movie coming thanks to a collaboration between Mojang and WB...
Minecraft creator, Marcus “Notch” Persson confirmed via Twitter that the Minecraft movie is actually happening, and is being produced with Warner Bros.
Someone is trying leak the fact that we're working with Warner Brothers on a potential Minecraft Movie. I wanted to be the leak!
— Markus Persson (@notch) February 27, 2014
After the tweet, Persson further solidified the news with an email to Polygon, stating that "It's for real. I think every part of that tweet was real, including me wanting to be the one to spill the news about a potential movie."
The film, which is, apparently, to be to be live action, is being produced by Roy Lee (The Lego Movie) and Jill Messick. It also reveals why Mojang was so keen to stop the recent Kickstarter Minecraft movie project.
It's very early days, so we'll have to wait a while before we see exactly what format a live action Minecraft movie will take, but it's certainly intriguing, even if a CG film would make far more sense given the subject matter.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Patrick Wilson joining Edgar Wright's Ant-Man
Paul Rudd and Michael Douglas will be joined by Patrick Wilson in Edgar Wright's Ant-Man movie.
We're not far away from the start of filming on Marvel's Ant-Man movie. Well, we say we're not far away. We're going to be sat here while Edgar Wright and his team put the movie together. But we suspect you get what we mean.
Anyway, there's a new addition to the movie's cast. Joining the already-announced Paul Rudd and Michael Douglas is Patrick Wilson. Wilson, who had a sizeable hit last year with The Conjuring, is joining the film in a thus-far undisclosed role.
Michael Pena is also on board the film, which is set for release in July 2015.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Fast & Furious 7 resuming filming in April
Production is set to resume on Fast & Furious 7 at the start of April, it's been revealed...
Following the tragic death of Paul Walker at the end of November, Universal and director James Wan have been working out how best to rework the in-production Fast & Furious 7. Along with screenwriter Chris Morgan, it looks like they've now found a way forward for the film, and production will resume in April.
The cast and crew will be shooting the film in Atlanta, and there's still have the movie yet to put together. It's believed that Walker's character will remain in the film.
Fast & Furious 7 is set for release on April 10th 2015.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Anchorman 3: "definitely no"
Director Adam McKay rules out an Anchorman 3 movie...
It took a long time for people who greenlight movies for a living to give the nod to last year's Anchorman: The Legend Continues. Turns out, after all the umming and aahing, that the film has proven to be a solid hit for Paramount. So much so that a new cut arrives in cinemas today for a week, with more jokes added in.
However, if you're thinking of starting a campaign for Anchorman 3, it's probably best not to bother. Chatting to Empire, director Adam McKay has ruled out returning to the land of Ron Burgundy again.
He said "that’s the last sequel we’re gonna do. There’s nothing more fun to me than new characters and a new world. And now we’re releasing this alt version, we’re totally satisfied. No Anchorman 3. I’m going to say definitely no. I’ll actually say it in this case!".
Anchorman 2, incidentally, arrives on DVD and Blu-ray at the end of April.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Why modern kids films have ditched the chosen one
How films like The LEGO Movie are replacing destiny narratives with messages of scepticism and adaptability…
Warning: contains spoilers for The LEGO Movie and Kung Fu Panda.
2013 saw the release of a film that sold a message antithetical to the upbeat ‘you can do it if you really try!’ cheerleading prevalent in kids’ movies. ‘Sometimes you can’t do it’, said this film, ‘even if you really, really, really try’.
It’s not as bleak a caution as it might seem. An imaginative scenario in which the hero fails but adapts teaches a useful lesson about flexibility (a skill parents might agree can be a tricky one for kids to take on). Wishing upon a star, working your socks off, thinking you can… in real life none of that guarantees a result. Isn’t it about time kids’ movies became comfortable with that idea?
The makers of Monsters University think so. They told the story of Mike Wazowski, a young monster with big dreams of being a professional Scarer. Years of focused hard work led Mike to study Scaring at the titular college, only for him to discover that he simply didn’t have it in him. All the hard work and ‘wanting it’ in the world couldn’t replace what he was missing: the natural quality of being scary.
“What you lack simply cannot be taught.”
Perhaps Mike’s plight wouldn’t have been so easy to accept had Monsters University not been a prequel to 2001’s Monsters Inc., a film in which the same Mike Wazowski revolutionises Scaring and saves the day. Safe in the knowledge that he went on to great things at a later date, we could happily watch the hero fail. Even so, it was a novel move from the prequel’s writers (and didn’t get in the way of the film taking over $700 million internationally).
Monsters University isn’t the only recent family film to reject traditional victory narratives in favour of more realistic life lessons. The excellent Kung Fu Panda franchise and The LEGO Movie both subvert the concept of the prophesied hero not by making the lead a ‘nobody’ (from Star Wars to Harry Potter, nobodies turning out to be somebodies has long been the shape of family film), but by swapping destiny and determinism for choice and motivation.
Prophecy shmophecy, say these kids’ pictures; heroes aren’t born, they’re made. Moreover, they’re self-made.
“There is no secret ingredient. It’s just you.”
The turning point for Po, the Jack Black-voiced hero of Kung Fu Panda, is his realisation that there is no secret ingredient in his father’s famous noodle soup. Because their customers believe there’s a special addition, the soup is considered the tastiest bowl around. Whether or not the ingredient exists is beside the point; the belief does the job. The same goes for the film’s legendary Dragon Scroll, heralded as the bringer of absolute power to its inheritor, the Dragon Warrior. On being unfurled, Po discovers that the scroll is blank. What he recognises that the villain, Tai Lung, does not, is that the scroll’s contents are beside the point. If the ‘Dragon Warrior’ believes in his power, that belief does the job.
It’s not a question of simply denying reality. Kung Fu Panda’s message isn’t the preposterous but tempting idea that anyone – fit, fat, agile or klutz – can achieve anything, but that our strength isn’t bestowed from outside; we have to recognise it in ourselves and make what use of it we can. Po’s idiosyncratic fighting abilities - a nerve blast-resistant layer of fat, the heft to belly-bounce his enemy into the sky, the motivating factor of much-loved food - aren’t despite, but thanks to, his size. Po isn’t the Dragon Warrior despite being fat, he’s the Dragon Warrior because he identifies and makes use of his unique talent as a fat Kung Fu artist. (As he tells Tai Lung in a self-assertive moment mid-fight, “I’m not a big fat panda, I’m the big fat panda”.)
While it’s heart-warming to watch The Little Engine Who Could defy physics to pull a load heavier than it’s designed to courtesy of positive thinking and determination, that’s just the kind of fluffy notion these family films are shrugging off. Now, the message to young audiences isn’t that you can do anything if only you believe it, but to recognise your strengths and apply them well.
“I don’t think he’s ever had an original thought”
The LEGO Movie is a neat illustration. Its everyman lead, Emmet Brickowski, is initially taken for prophesied hero The Special, the ultimate Master Builder (LEGO characters who, unlike the poor schmucks who can only follow instructions, are able to construct anything they can imagine), a chosen one destined to save the world. The problem with Emmet being chosen as the ultimate creator is that well, he’s not really the creative type.
In itself, that’s a twist on kids’ movie tradition. From The Never-Ending Story to A Bug’s Life and more, we’re used to seeing the oddball creative first being ridiculed for, then saving the day with their boundless imagination. Unlike the heroes of eighties kids’ fantasies (Labyrinth, Willow, Return To Oz, the aforementioned The Never-Ending Story), Emmet isn’t a marginalised dreamer but the most regular of Joes. The few ideas Emmet does have are roundly acknowledged to be terrible, and largely remain so throughout the film.
What Emmet can do is follow instructions. In a reversal of the ‘mock the dreamer/hey, the dreamer saved us’ pattern, Emmet is first scorned for lacking imagination, then his lack of imagination helps to win the day. The ability to work as part of a team, within a structure that’s bigger than its individual parts, is Emmet’s super power. (The LEGO Movie is perhaps the only pro-creativity family movie that counsels the benefit of containing genius and inspiration within a workable structure - someone on that writing team has boned up on their Early Years teaching theory).
“Let It Go”
In much the same way, the eponymous lead in Aardman’s Arthur Christmas, a golden-hearted but anxious youngest son, doesn’t overcome his anxiety to become the film’s hero, but instead learns how to use it to his advantage. Arthur coins “Do it with worry!” as his somewhat awkward mantra towards the end of the film, finding strength in his ‘weakness’. Like Kung Fu Panda’s Po, Arthur doesn’t defeat his particular problem, but by acknowledging it, learns to thrive.
Though Elsa’s extraordinary powers in Disney’s Frozen might disqualify her from a discussion about films depicting heroism as an intrinsic, not extrinsic quality, her abilities are more curse than boon to her in much of the film. Like Po and Arthur, it’s only by accepting her unique power - feeling it and not, as the song says, concealing it - that Elsa can prosper. Not all gifts are a blessing, Frozen reminds us. It’s your attitude towards them that counts. (And of course, true love, but where would a Disney movie be without that?)
On the subject of which, Shrek’s Princess Fiona learns a similar lesson when true love’s kiss doesn’t do as she (and we) expect and cure her of the ‘curse’ that transforms her nightly into an ogre. Unlike the Princesses in other fairy stories, Fiona’s ogre side turns out to be love’s true form, not the svelte human form she (and we) had been taught was beautiful. Shrek’s positive body image message is an early example of the modern family film trend for subverting received ideas on heroism and promoting self-acceptance and adaptability over birth rights and destiny.
“The Special has arisen”
The LEGO Movie’s enjoyable scepticism isn’t confined to its smart, satirical introduction to Bricksburg, the city of happy little consumer-conformers happily lapping up spoon-fed shallow culture from which Emmet hails. It also pokes fun at the fantasy genre’s reliance on Chosen One prophecies.
The film’s own prophecy concerns The Special (a blandly generic, self-mocking term that draws attention to the prevalence of the plot device). Mistaken for The Special, the one person destined to stop evil Lord Business from using the Kragle to end the world, Emmet fakes it not til he makes it, but til the prophecy is debunked. Once unshackled by mystical destinies, Emmet and pals get on with the business of believing in their abilities and choosing to save the world. Though bogus, the prophecy is fulfilled (as tends to happen), but thanks to teamwork, compassion and ingenuity, not powers bestowed by a magical fate.
Speaking of magic, the Harry Potter film series variously endorses and rejects notions of prophecy and chosen ones, meriting more discussion than we’ve room for here. We’ll leave it for another time.
“I volunteer as tribute!”
Moving up the age bracket, The Hunger Games is another enormously successful modern YA franchise that privileges choice over being ‘chosen’. There’s no prophesy about the girl on fire in The Hunger Games, no mystical scrolls or crystal orbs containing clues as to Katniss Everdeen’s future. It all starts with Katniss’ agency, and her self-sacrificial choice to volunteer in place of her younger sister as a death match tribute.
As a resident of Panem’s poverty-stricken District 12, Katniss Everdeen’s life-options are more or less limited to surviving and keeping her family alive. One choice that is allowed her is the essentially suicidal decision to volunteer and save her sister. Death is more or less the only realm Katniss has any agency over in the first story; inside the arena, she decides the terms of the District 12 team’s deaths, preferring poison to slaughter. She and neighbour Peeta Mellark live to fight in another sequel, but the intention was for them die on their own terms, an act of defiance against a sadistic and despotic system.
In its depiction of the bubble-headed, celebrity-obsessed Capitol, The Hunger Games shares The LEGO Movie’s scepticism towards modern pop culture (the song Everything Is Awesome would be a huge hit in Panem’s capital). That thread of scepticism continues in its depiction of revolutionary politics. Though Katniss isn’t a prophesied Chosen One, she, like The LEGO Movie’s Emmet, is constructed by the rebels into a revolutionary figurehead, manipulated by others into being a catalyst for rebellion. The LEGO Movie and The Hunger Games aren’t only dubious about vacuous pop culture, but, by respectively debunking Emmet’s prophecy and examining the behind-the-scenes construction of a political icon, both teaches their audience to be sceptical about the heroes with whom we’re presented.
“You have no power over me”
Perhaps fittingly under Thatcher and Reagan, 80s fantasy kids’ films were a great deal keener on Chosen One narratives. Their heroes followed prophecies to victory, from Bastian, the human child who saves Fantasia in The Never-Ending Story, to the eponymous hero of Willow, who fulfils the evil-Queen defeating destiny of infant Elora, and Jen, the Gelfling sent to reunite The Dark Crystal’s titular gem with its dark half. These characters followed instructions, marking their way through a series of pre-ordained steps to succeed in their tasks.
Bastian and Sarah’s respective adventures in The Never-Ending Story and Labyrinth, for instance, are determined by the contents of a book, Choose Your Own Adventure stories each one performs in their respective film. Each step of Sarah’s journey, from banishing her baby brother to returning home, was already written for her. Unlike the modern heroes we’ve discussed, Sarah brings about her escape from the Goblin King not by accepting the peculiarities of her character (I love the film, but does she really even have one?) but through the recitation of a line someone else has written, “You have no power over me”. Unlike Emmet, Po, Arthur, Katniss and the rest of them, Sarah and her 80s counterparts weren’t agents, but puppets of their stories.
“Everything is awesome”
On reflection, the modern message is ultimately the more uplifting. If there are no Chosen Ones, then we all have the choice of becoming a hero. Instead of bemoaning our inadequacies, we can celebrate our idiosyncratic strengths and work with others to save the day without waiting for a superhero to come along and save it for us. When The LEGO Movie’s Wyldstyle encourages the citizens of Bricksburg to channel their inner Master Builder and celebrate their uniquely silly imaginations, her democratising message is infinitely more useful than holding out for a hero. In times of economic and environmental uncertainty, perhaps movies don’t need to teach kids how to fulfil their destinies, but how to forge them.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Our 2014 Oscar Predictions
We examine some of the biggest categories and predict just who is bringing home the gold in our 2014 Oscar predictions...
In case you didn't notice every entertainment journalist from the Dolby Theatre all the way to Radio City Music Hall getting out their black ties or sparkling sequins, allow us to announce that it’s Oscar Weekend! This Sunday, Hollywood is uncorking the champagne, unrolling the red carpet, and tripping the light fantastic as the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences honors what they deem the most worthy of taking home those little, auspicious, nude men. And if you don’t have an invitation to the Elton John after-party, then chances are you are looking for any last minute tips with the office pool. So, here are our last fateful predictions to help you with all things Oscar.
NOTE: These predictions will primarily be focused on the heavy hitters for Oscar’s big night, and which we predict will win (not which is best).
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE
Christian Bale in “American Hustle”
Bruce Dern in “Nebraska”
Leonardo DiCaprio in “The Wolf of Wall Street”
Chiwetel Ejiofor in “12 Years a Slave”
Matthew McConaughey in “Dallas Buyers Club”
In a no-brainer win, Matthew McConaughey has been riding a wave of critical acclaim since Dallas Buyers Club premiered at the 2013 Toronto International Film Festival. Easily one of the best movies of the year, Dallas features McConaughey at the height of his career following a five-year long crescendo to McConaissance glory. Yes, there is undoubtedly a school of thought that says it is finally DiCaprio’s year, however as per usual, the Academy will punt on that again. McConaughey has the bigger “Cinderella story” that plays well into Oscar ballot casting and political campaigns, as he has transformed himself over several years from a supposed lightweight to one of the most respected leading men in Hollywood who is about to be awarded for his entire body of staggering work in 2013, including impressive turns in Mud and his film-defining cameo in The Wolf of Wall Street. Also losing 47 pounds to play a real-life hero from the AIDS epidemic is far easier to get behind than playing a scummy Wall Street broker who swindled millions from clients to fuel his drug habits.
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Barkhad Abdi in “Captain Phillips”
Bradley Cooper in “American Hustle”
Michael Fassbender in “12 Years a Slave”
Jonah Hill in “The Wolf of Wall Street”
Jared Leto in “Dallas Buyers Club”
And the other acting lock for Dallas Buyers Club comes from a performance that is far more transformative than the name above the credits. As “Rayon,” Jared Leto proves that he can also be one of the loveliest ladies on film when Rayon goes into business with McConaughey’s initially homophobic Ron Woodroof to smuggle life-saving AZT medication across the Mexican border. Another political performance, this one pushes viewers, including the older skewing and more traditional voting Academy, into seeing things from another perspective, even if it is in the form of a cross-dresser who has a very unglamorous cocaine habit to go along with HIV. Rayon demands that Ron puts a face to the AIDS nightmare. And soon, the AMPAS will put an Oscar to Leto’s.
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE
Amy Adams in “American Hustle”
Cate Blanchett in “Blue Jasmine”
Sandra Bullock in “Gravity”
Judi Dench in “Philomena”
Meryl Streep in “August: Osage County”
Cate Blanchett is going to easily walk away with a much-deserved Oscar for her stunning performance in Blue Jasmine. Whatever controversy may be swirling around writer-director Woody Allen, he can undeniably write great female characters, and he and Blanchett have crafted the most memorable fallen socialite this side of Blanche DuBois. Pain is relative, so for the titular Jasmine—the newly penniless widow of a Wall Street conman (Alec Baldwin) who committed suicide in prison—being suddenly whisked into the West Coast working class with her hapless sister (Sally Hawkins) is akin to waterboarding. Blanchett captures every contour of mental anguish and ultimate destruction in Jasmine’s delicately refined features as they fade away on the muddied streets. The definition of all dolled up with no place to go, the only thing left for Blanchett’s Jasmine is Oscar gold.
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Sally Hawkins in “Blue Jasmine”
Jennifer Lawrence in “American Hustle”
Lupita Nyong’o in “12 Years a Slave”
Julia Roberts in “August: Osage County”
June Squibb in “Nebraska”
Jennifer Lawrence may have won the Golden Globe, the BAFTA, and every single American’s heart, but she didn’t win the SAG. And when the Screen Actors Guild, the voting body that anointed American Hustle the best ensemble of 2013, can’t bring themselves to give it to her two years in a row, neither will the Academy with its plethora of actors, and even more non-acting members. Lupita Nyong’o was fantastic in 12 Years a Slave through a character type that is often glossed over in big screen cinema. Also, it has a nice bit of progressive symbolism for the Academy to go from awarding Hattie McDaniel for her lovingly deferential Mammy in Gone with the Wind to Nyong’o’s haunting Patsey. Plus, this permits the Academy to reserve more Lawrence adoration for the years to come.
ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
“American Hustle” Written by Eric Warren Singer and David O. Russell
“Blue Jasmine” Written by Woody Allen
“Dallas Buyers Club” Written by Craig Borten & Melisa Wallack
“Her” Written by Spike Jonze
“Nebraska” Written by Bob Nelson
Still, SAG did love American Hustle overall, and the movie’s one opportunity to enjoy a really “major” above the line award this year will probably be in the Original Screenplay category. Like many, I found Spike Jonze’s screenplay for Her to be nothing short of extraordinary with its Rorschach-like ability to either be a charming 21st century romance or a terrifying parable for the iPhone generation. However, the picture’s intentional ambiguity, and sometimes apathy, about the role of technology or the even more intangible horror—love—makes it slightly too obtuse for a voting body that tends to look back more than forward. And just as last year’s Argo found suspense in the glam and garish of the 1970s, so too does Eric Singer and David O. Russell’s frantic screenplay, which never sits down long enough for the characters to realize that they’re in so over their heads that they can touch ocean floor. It’s a snappy, witty piece of writing with enough goodwill from its terrific acting ensemble to make Academy voters consider this an excellent consolation prize.
ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
“Before Midnight” Written by Richard Linklater, Julie Delpy, and Ethan Hawke
“Captain Phillips” Screenplay by Billy Ray
“Philomena” Screenplay by Steve Coogan and Jeff Pope
“12 Years a Slave” Screenplay by John Ridley
“The Wolf of Wall Street” Screenplay by Terence Winter
And if one movie is looking to pick up a consolation prize, it’s Captain Phillips. A seeming lock for direction and lead acting nominations for Paul Greengrass and Tom Hanks, respectively, the movie has surprisingly had to accept a token Best Picture nomination and a well-earned Supporting Actor nod for first-timer Barkhad Abdi. Yet, the picture still stands an excellent chance in the category of Adapted Screenplay to get its much missed Oscar love, as the biggest competitor, Steve Coogan and Jeff Pope’s lovely Philomena, never enjoyed the kind of exposure necessary to topple the Captain. More feel good than 12 Years or Wolf, and less challenging (and indie) than Before Midnight, it is Captain Phillips’ to lose.
ACHIEVEMENT IN CINEMATOGRAPHY
“The Grandmaster” Philippe Le Sourd
“Gravity” Emmanuel Lubezki
“Inside Llewyn Davis” Bruno Delbonnel
“Nebraska” Phedon Papamichael
“Prisoners” Roger A. Deakins
What should be one of many, many good omens for Gravity on Oscar night, Cinematgoraphy will be part of its technical sweep. Emmanuel Lubezki outdid himself with a confounding, brilliant, and utterly hypnotic visual style that tricked the eye into often believing the camera was simply floating through real space around the actors for dozens of minutes at a time. A technical marvel, cinematography is one of the many things that stand out about Gravity.
ACHIEVEMENT IN VISUAL EFFECTS
“Gravity” Tim Webber, Chris Lawrence, Dave Shirk and Neil Corbould
“The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug” Joe Letteri, Eric Saindon, David Clayton and Eric Reynolds
“Iron Man 3” Christopher Townsend, Guy Williams, Erik Nash and Dan Sudick
“The Lone Ranger” Tim Alexander, Gary Brozenich, Edson Williams and John Frazier
“Star Trek Into Darkness” Roger Guyett, Patrick Tubach, Ben Grossmann and Burt Dalton
Another is the equally seamless visual effects that made that orbital dreamscape possible. One of the most jaw-dropping spectacles of the last decade, Gravity never once allows viewers to doubt anything less than their complete surrender into the film’s reality. The highest compliment to be paid is that most forget that it is a visual effect while watching the movie. Many more still don’t realize that even the helmets in Gravity are completely CGI!
ACHIEVEMENT IN MUSIC WRITTEN FOR MOTION PICTURES (ORIGINAL SCORE)
“The Book Thief” John Williams
“Gravity” Steven Price
“Her” William Butler and Owen Pallett
“Philomena” Alexandre Desplat
“Saving Mr. Banks” Thomas Newman
In a year where few musical scores were truly out of this world, Steven Price’s Gravity will also likely benefit from the movie’s technical majesty. Indeed, the final orchestral march of the film, after a certain character reaches their long-awaited destination, is enough to shake any viewer into submission to the sheer grandeur of what has just been endured.
ACHIEVEMENT IN MUSIC WRITTEN FOR MOTION PICTURES (ORIGINAL SONG)
“Alone Yet Not Alone” from “Alone Yet Not Alone”
“Happy” from “Despicable Me 2”
“Let It Go” from “Frozen”
“The Moon Song” from “Her”
“Ordinary Love” from “Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom”
Also in one of the night’s safest bets is Robert Lopez and Kristen Anderson-Lopez’s anthem to self-empowerment via the best Disney musical number in at least a decade. “Let It Go,” which will hopefully bring down every speaker in the Dolby Theatre when Idina Menzel takes the stage Sunday evening, is a power ballad that embraces Broadway like rarely seen in multiplexes. It may not have won the Golden Globe, but the Academy has been itching to award Disney like it’s still the Menken-Ashman days for a long time now, and this might be a return to that glory.
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM OF THE YEAR
“The Croods”
Chris Sanders, Kirk DeMicco and Kristine Belson
“Despicable Me 2”
Chris Renaud, Pierre Coffin and Chris Meledandri
“Ernest & Celestine”
Benjamin Renner and Didier Brunner
“Frozen”
Chris Buck, Jennifer Lee and Peter Del Vecho
“The Wind Rises”
Hayao Miyazaki and Toshio Suzuki
The one award Frozen has locked up tighter than the harbor of Arendelle is the Best Animated Feature category. Not only is Frozen the most successful animated film of 2013, it is also about to cross $1 billion as a global phenomenon. This Disney fairy tale has captured the imagination of everyone from 3-years-old to 93-years-old. Returning to the magic Disney has not seen since the proverbial renaissance of hand-drawn animation, the movie has supplanted all the competition for this easy victory. The closest rival, The Wind Rises, has way too much political baggage for romanticizing the man who crafted the planes that bombed Pearl Harbor. It may be Miyazaki’s last film, but it is Walt Disney Animation Studio’s first to capture the imagination of the Academy since the creation of the Best Animated Film category. And as the Academy once famously gave Beauty and the Beast a Best Picture nomination (before there were 10 slots available), this is their chance to finally recognize that classic style with a win for more than just song or score. Indeed, it may mark a whole new world for Disney.
ACHIEVEMENT IN DIRECTING
“American Hustle” David O. Russell
“Gravity” Alfonso Cuarón
“Nebraska” Alexander Payne
“12 Years a Slave” Steve McQueen
“The Wolf of Wall Street” Martin Scorsese
Yes, I know that Alfonso Cuarón is the frontrunner for his superb work on Gravity. I also realize that he has already picked up the DGA, the Golden Globe, and the BAFTA, the latter of which he beat out English-born Steve McQueen for. And yet, this is still the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, and this is still the award for Achievement in Directing. Genre filmmaking, particularly the science fiction genre, just does not win one of the highest prizes. It took Peter Jackson three consecutive films and a combined $2.8 billion global grossing to warm the institution to the idea of crowning a fantasy achievement, and that one featured more than two characters. Despite all indications pointing to Cuarón, the truth is the Academy rarely has split years. Last Oscar night was a fluke anomaly when the directing branch of the AMPAS made a special slight at Ben Affleck, whose snubbing became a campaign cry for Warner Brothers all the way to the Best Picture circle. If Affleck had been on the wider ballot to compete against Ang Lee after his picture had won the top prizes at the DGA and PGA, things might have gone differently. More often than not, the Academy ties Best Director to Best Picture like an anchor, and the AMPAS absolutely will not give Best Picture to a sci-fi film…
BEST MOTION PICTURE OF THE YEAR
“American Hustle”
A Columbia Pictures and Annapurna Pictures Production
“Captain Phillips” A Columbia Pictures Production
“Dallas Buyers Club”
A Voltage Pictures, R2 Films, Evolution Independent Production
“Gravity”
A Warner Bros. UK Services Limited Production
“Her”
An Annapurna Production
“Nebraska”
A Paramount Vantage Production
“Philomena”
A Pathé, BBC Films, BFI, Canal+, Cine+ and Baby Cow/Magnolia Mae Production
“12 Years a Slave”
A River Road, Plan B, New Regency Production
“The Wolf of Wall Street”
A Red Granite Production
…Because 12 Years a Slave is going to win Best Picture. Despite the increased competition from Gravity as of late, gathering steam from its varied guild wins, the picture will not dethrone a period piece dealing with one of America’s greatest sins. There is a contingency that suggests 12 Years is too harrowing to even be viewed by some of the more squeamish Academy members, much less win their votes. But just as pictures like Schindler’s List overcame the grimness of its subject matter through historical relevancy, so too will this movie, even from voters who may turn their heads at McQueen’s most visceral depictions of institutionalized barbarism and human suffering. There is a compelling argument for Gravity’s ascendance due to the preferential voting tally for this category, which theoretically will allow it to bypass 12 Years and the more conventional American Hustle. However, this theory makes the assumption that American Hustle is a spoiler for 12 Years, when Gravity could truthfully end up in just as many “third spots” as second place picks. When we first analyzed the nominees during the day of their announcement, American Hustle seemed to be in a much more robust position than it currently holds. However, it still sits pretty with SAG and much of the Academy’s voting body, which while threatening to the equally impressive acting ensemble for 12 Years, also constitutes many voters who may consider genre as a viable choice for Best Picture.
At the end of the day, Hustle doesn’t have the juice to beat Gravity, and yet Gravity doesn’t have enough of its title’s namesake (at least as decreed by the narrow, unwritten parameters of Academy consideration) to carry the top prize. Thus, it will be 12 Years this Sunday.
Those are our predictions for tomorrow’s big dance. Agree with them? Disagree with them? Think that Her can win it all? Let us know in the comments section below!
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Interview with Julianne Moore and Liam Neeson on Non-Stop
We sat down with Julianne Moore and Liam Neeson to discuss flying, filming and fighting on the set of Non-Stop.
When you’re making a film like this, does it make you think more about that line that we tread between being vigilant and being paranoid in a post-9/11 world?
Julianne Moore: Obviously when you’re constructing entertainment, all kind of thrillers and horror movies or anything that’s supposed to give us a scare, they’re all based on what our natural worries are. You sort of take them and exaggerate them. You know, are you scared of ghosts? Is it the devil? I’m very scared of the devil. [Laughs] But in this case, you take something that’s sort of routine where obviously when you enter an airplane, you’re giving up some control, all of us, and you play on that fear. And what I liked so much about this particular script and Jaume’s handling of it, is that he takes a rather ordinary circumstance and turns it into kind of a Hitchcockian event. It’s very reminiscent of those older movies and of the disaster movies I loved as a kid like Poseidon Adventure and Towering Inferno, so it becomes kind of a classic entertainment. [To Liam] See if you can be better than that. [Laughs]
Liam Neeson: It’s just we all know the nightmares of airports nowadays. It’s playing on those fears, but it’s an entertainment, you know? A lot of the journalists in Europe, quite a few actually, were asking about September 11th and it’s like, ‘Oh, please.’ That being said, I don’t think the film could have been made a few years ago, of course. It would have been totally insensitive, but it’s a backdrop to a thriller. That’s what it is.
We saw how Jen and Bill handle the situation in the movie, but how would Julianne and Liam approach it?
JM: We’d run screaming from the room! [Laughs]
LN: What do you do now? I mean, I don’t know. Thankfully I’ve never been in that situation. You’d like to think you would be heroic, but who knows, you know? Who knows?
You wouldn’t try to kick anyone’s ass?
JM: Just mine.
LN: I don’t think so. I’m a pacifist.
What drew you to your roles and, Liam, have you had any martial arts training?
LN: I’ve done a mongrel version of different fight stuff for years depending on what the action is in the film, but in this one, we didn’t want to adopt martial arts. It’s so corny, you know? Whatever physical altercations happen on the airplane, we wanted to make them real. I worked quite closely with a special forces guy that trains air marshals. We came up with the fight in the bathroom based on stuff that he was trained himself to do in very, very close combat situations, what you would do to disarm someone. So we tried to keep that real and exciting too, of course.
I was thinking that by now, with all the movies that you’ve done, you’ve probably learned some stuff.
LN: Yeah, but you learn it and then you forget about it. It’s like learning a dance; you learn that dance for the scene or something. Or studying for exams. You [study, study], exam’s over and you’ve forgotten half of it - except for light saber. I know how to [handle that]. [Laughs]
Can you take us back to the very first time you went on a flight and what you remember about that time? Do you have a lucky charm that you bring on flights with you?
LN: My first flight, I was a late developer in every department, but I went on an airplane at the age of 21, I believe, a flight to Amsterdam from. Belfast. Ciarán Hinds. Do you know Ciarán Hinds? He’s my oldest friend. We were going to a theater course in a place called Enschede, 30 miles south of Amsterdam. It was terrifying, flying. It was a hop and a skip, that’s all it was, but that was my first time. I was very, very scared. Very nervous, I should say.
Is Ciarán your lucky charm then?
LN: I guess he is in a way, actually. We haven’t flown together since.
Julianne?
JM: My first flight, I don’t remember this. My mother said that we flew back from Panama. My father was stationed at the canal zone all those years ago. So, we flew back and we were pretty little and evidently I – and I don’t remember who was who - one of us was looking out of the window saying, ‘Oh, look at the beautiful clouds,’ and the other one, cause we were a year apart, said, ‘You’re making me sick.’ So I don’t know if I said that or she said that, but that’s not my memory, it’s my mother’s.
[related article: Non-Stop review]
There was a statement made in the film that security in this country is the biggest lie. Do either of you ever feel ill at ease when you’re traveling?
LN: I have to admit, I don’t. Listen, we all know what security at airports is like. We’ve all experienced it and it’s a nightmare, but these are the times we’re living in. Once I get through that other round, I totally relax and I love flying as a result of that. I feel totally safe, and that’s my experience now.
JM: I do. I feel that people are meticulous and very careful and thoughtful about what’s happening and what I see around me is that people are agreeing to this because it’s a group effort.
How do you feel about the intimacy of the production? I spoke to the director before and he said all of the actors were on set the whole time together. How did that help your performances and also did being in an actual airport setting help increase the tension?
LN: The actual airport setting, we were at JFK for two nights quite late on in the shoot, and that was kind of strange being in a real airport.
JM: It was like chickens being let out of a pen. [Laughs] We’re all like, ‘Ahhh, it’s a regular place! Look at this place! You want to go get coffee? You want to go over there? You want to go over there?’ Yeah, our set was nice!
LN: The set was great. It was tough on the crew. I’m sure Jaume told you that, very tough because they had 50 guys and girls trying to disappear, being pushed into little spaces whereas we were sitting in first class seats.
JM: Reading a magazine. It was pretty comfortable, and it was a great group of people. It really is wonderfully cast. To have Lupita Nyong’o and Michelle Dockery as your flight attendants? And, you know, Corey Stoll, Scoot McNairy, Nate Parker and Linus Roache. It was really great and so it was fun to be with everybody. It was nice to have everyone on set.
LN: Everyday too, so it was great. We looked forward to it. It was lovely to be with these people, and the extras, too. There were over a 100 extras. We got to know them, some of them quite well. They had a lot to do, you know?
Both of your characters had an air of mystery. There are a lot of questions that are never answered. How was it developing characters like that for this movie?
JM: I liked the fact that there was mystery about all of the characters because I feel like in life, that’s the way it is. In cinema, people are always walking into something and saying, ‘This is who I am, this is what I want, this how I’m gonna get it,’ and we don’t in life, particularly not in a public situation. People don’t know your name. They might know your first name, not your last name, or vice versa. They don’t know what you do and you’re not gonna offer it up. So, if you start there, you realize this is probably a much more normal presentation in a film than what you would ordinarily have. You kind of go, okay, well, who is this, and you know that there’s a big life behind what everyone presents and that, I think, is super interesting, the fact that you can scratch someone and find out all of these things that you’d never know.
LN: I relied on Jaume a lot because he’s a very, very prepared director, and any queries we had about the script or what a character should do or not do, we always tried to judge it to the nth degree because he was always thinking of the overall arc - the symphony, I like to use that word - of the whole film, you know? That just the raise of an eyebrow sometimes might just be too much. It’s in the trailer, Jules, when I walk away and she’s lying asleep and she just opens her eyes and to me it’s like, ‘Oh my god, suspicious.’ But she’s just opening her eyes! Every little nuisance or gesture we were aware could take on some significance. That being said, we weren’t put in a straightjacket, you know?
JM: Except me when I really got on his nerves. [Laughs]
I started to notice that in a lot of these action thrillers you’ve done recently that no one seems to believe you. In Taken, the captors don’t believe you’ll find them, in Unknown, no one believes you are who you say you are, and in this one, everyone thinks you’re a terrorist. I was just wondering, is that idea of distrust what attracts you to a lot of these roles?
LN: Sure, I’d like to think if I play these so-called action heroes, they’re vulnerable and they’re nervous and there’s something very, very serious at stake. If it’s your daughter’s been kidnapped, those of us who are parents, you’ll do anything for your kid. I always try and portray a weakness or a vulnerability on top of knowing you can kick ass.
JM: Yeah, I think that’s why audiences respond to Liam this way, because he does present a very humane, sensitive, complicated person, a real person who then becomes the hero, so it’s not like a superhero coming in. You know that Superman is gonna be able to do it. He’s not even a real person. But to have Liam represent that, I think he brings a real sense of authenticity to all of these characters.
Liam, I was wondering if you could talk about playing a darker, more troubled character. This one seems to be a little bit less in charge than the other action roles you’ve played before.
LN: A little less in charge, I guess, yes. He’s not in charge because he’s an alcoholic, he’s an addict; that’s always in charge. So his big battle is he thinks he’s just doing a six and a half-hour flight. That’s his goal is to do that without having alcohol, of course. All shit breaks loose. I love the fact that we - and it was in the script, that Jaume covers without the audience being banged over the head – in the height of that crisis, there’s a beautiful bottle of whiskey waiting to be drunk, but he doesn’t. It’s a little human gesture that I think really resonates with people because it is human and many of us our addicts whether it’s tobacco or whatnot. So I like those little human touches, you know?
Julianne, can you talk about your ability to have so many diverse roles over the span of your career? And what kind of traveler are you guys? Are you okay with people coming up to you while you’re flying?
LN: First off, can I just say, Julianne is one of our great screen actresses, period. [Clapping] So we were so lucky to have her in this part, which was, the first script I read of it was this passenger beside me was quite a bland part, and then when I heard they were going to go to Julianne, I thought there’s no way she’s gonna do this and she did and elevated the whole film.
JM: Well, Liam had a lot to do with that, honestly, and Joel Silver. I was talking to some people the other day about Assassins. That was a movie at the beginning of my career, my first movie with Joel Silver, and so when he called me about this and Liam was doing this, and I liked the script so much, that’s kind of how it came about, but I like to mix it up. If I’ve done something really serious, I like to do a comedy. If I’ve done a comedy and I find a thriller that’s interesting to me, I like to do that, too. I like genre, I like movies, I like to accrue experience, so that’s really been it. And I don’t really plan things. You can’t! In our business, you really can’t. We have less control than we’d like, but yeah, I do feel fortunate just to work really,
And what kind of traveler are you?
LN: Do you mean like a fear of flying and stuff?
No, more like when people walk up to you in the airport.
LN: I just say f*ck off. [Laughs] Especially when it’s kids. Especially when they ask me to sign a Star Wars photograph, some little seven-year-old. I’m joking, of course. I don’t get hassled too much. I don’t know if you do, Jules.
JM: People are really nice, honestly. Sometimes I really do talk to people and have a nice conversation. I do talk to women with children a lot because, you know, you feel for them. If somebody sits next to me with a baby, I’m gonna talk to her because I’ve been there.
A lot of the characters were stereotypical. You had the angry young black man, you had the heroic cop, the Middle Eastern man… It’s playing on these public, preconceived notions that we have. Do you think it was smart for the writers to angle it that way and was the end goal to increase our paranoia that it could possibly be anybody?
LN: I think at first glance they’re kind of stereotypical, but I think Jaume played with that, in our own heads, too. You know, of course there’s the Muslim doctor and you go, ‘Yeah, this is interesting,’ but it’s not going to be him. It’s not going to be the other African American kid that we think it’s definitely this guy, he’s got a real attitude. He plays with all that.
JM: It upends our expectations, I think, and even with a character – well, I mean, let’s not give it away - a character like mine who won’t give anything up. You think, ‘Well, come on,’ and it turns out it’s just completely personal, so you can’t preconceive these things. You really don’t know who somebody is. You don’t know what their inner life is or what their interests are or determine how they’re gonna behave and I think Jaume does that deliberately.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Win a Raid:Redemption DVD and Raid 2 Trading Cards!
We're giving away a copy of The Raid: Redemption on DVD and a stack of Raid 2 trading cards! Here's how you can win...
The Raid 2: Berendalfrom director Gareth Evans hits US theaters on March 28th. To celebrate, we're giving away a copy of the first Raid movie, The Raid: Redemption on DVD and a stack of 26 super rare collector's edition trading cards featuring characters from The Raid 2! How can you win such a cool prize pack? We're glad you asked!
The Raid: Redemption is generally considered to be one of the best action flicks of recent years. We're hoping The Raid 2follows in its footsteps. All you've gotta do is follow us on Twitter, Google+, or Facebook, and then tell us what YOUR favorite straight-up action movie of all time is, and why! And there you have it! The contest closes on Saturday, March 15th at 11:59 PM (EST), and we'll announce a winner via social media on March 17th!
Check out a few of the trading cards below, and then enter to win the complete set AND a copy of The Raid: Redemption on DVD!
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
New Stills From Gareth Edwards' New Godzilla Movie
Check out new pics from the Gareth Edwards' new Godzilla movie featuring Bryan Cranston, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, and the big guy himself.
Up from the depths and 40 stories high, Godzilla is one big guy; he’s also one creature that Legendary Pictures and Warner Brothers wants to remind you has continued to grow over the years. As appearing in the newest issue of Empire, the producers have released several new images of the King of Monsters, along with pictures of director Gareth Edwards, as well as stars Bryan Cranston and Aaron Taylor-Johnson. Most interesting of all though is a scale that compares “Legendary” Godzilla with all of his forebearers, including the previous American adaptation of the critter, Sony’s 1998Godzilla.
The new Godzilla movie also stars Elizabeth Olsen, David Strathaim, Ken Watanabe, Juliette Binoche, and Sally Hawkins. Itopens May 16, 2014 in 2D, 3D, and IMAX.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Godzilla: our spoiler-free preview reaction
Earlier today, we sat down to watch 20 minutes of the new Godzilla movie. Here’s a spoiler-free summary of our impressions...
NB: While the below is spoiler-free, do avoid reading further if you’d prefer to see the final film absolutely cold.
You’d expect a modern, new Godzilla movie to be a widescreen spectacle, but the first thing that strikes us about director Gareth Edwards’ forthcoming reboot is its new take on the beast’s iconic roar: deafening, blood-curdling, ferocious.
Den Of Geek was lucky enough to be invited to a 20-minute preview of this summer’s Godzilla, and there was a palpable, almost gleeful air of excitement in the room as the lights went down. Although we won’t go into spoiler-filled detail here, we can report that what we saw was promising. Very promising indeed.
First, there’s the reassuring presence of Bryan Cranston. Fans of Breaking Bad will know how powerful an actor he is, and we were encouraged to note just how much passion he puts into his performance here. A nuclear physicist named Joe Brody, his character has a personal and tragic connection to the title monster, and in one superbly-acted scene, we see how determined he is to uncover the true nature of its origins.
Then there’s Brody's son Ford (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), a soldier in the US army. As we’ve seen from the trailer, he’s another key character in the ensemble, helping to ground this global disaster from the street level. Initially stationed in East Asia, his goal is to get back to America as the monster-hastened catastrophe begins to spread across the planet.
The true star of the piece, of course, is Godzilla himself. In a later Q&A, Edwards revealed the time and effort spent on getting the look and size of the creature just right. Make him too small, and he doesn’t pose the mountainous threat the plot requires. Make him too big, and he’s simply too ungainly to hide himself in seas or among the thicket of buildings in a city. This Godzilla, the director informed us, is 350 feet tall - the biggest incarnation we’ve yet seen, but still nimble enough to pop up at inopportune times.
While Godzilla’s the main draw, we get the impression that Edwards will be careful not to over-expose the prized creature until he absolutely has to. The flashes we saw of Godzilla were largely partial - the crags of his huge back looming up out ocean spray, or his scaled back as he lumbers through a benighted city. These shots recall Ishiro Honda’s 1954 original, where Godzilla was repeatedly seen at night, lit up by the burning fires of buildings or the crackle of falling electrical pylons.
Edwards appears to have a similar eye for atmosphere and invoking a sense of awe. Like Spielberg, Edwards repeatedly shoots his action scenes from the perspective of the smallest and most vulnerable - the wide eyes of a child in one superb shot, or a fleeing stray dog in another.
Destruction’s a given in a Godzilla movie, but the devastation we saw doesn’t appear to be akin to the lingering revelry we see in so many summer movies. The havoc Godzilla causes is akin to the aftermath of an earthquake or tsunami - a tragedy, with a real human cost. This is as it should be, since Honda’s first film was a serious, perfectly haunting meditation on the power of nuclear weapons, and how the don’t - and can’t - discriminate between soldiers or civilians.
Edwards’ Godzilla still has something of a nuclear theme - it’s said that the creature is attracted by nuclear radiation - but the underlying meditation in his film is about humanity versus nature. We’d hesitate to say that it has an environmental theme as such, but it’s easy to draw a parallel between the events of the modern Godzilla and the sad aftermath of recent natural disasters, such as the earthquake and tsunami in Japan and the ongoing crisis in Fukushima.
Although some of the effects shots clearly weren’t finished, the ones that were looked exceptional. Not just because of the quality of the CGI, which it’s easy to become numbed to each summer, but in the way the effects shots are executed. From the striking, sinister use of red against grey (a refreshing change from Hollywood cinema’s ever-present teal and orange) to the harsh use of light and shade, Godzilla appears to retain some of the arthouse sensibility that enriched Edwards’ breakthrough film, Monsters.
Like Monsters, Godzilla uses contrasting sequences of loud and quiet and intimate and colossal to create its drama. There’s a superb moment where Taylor-Johnson’s soldier stands at the mouth of a railway tunnel with the rest of his detachment, listening. It’s night time, and the silence is eerie. But then a dreadful noises emerges from the depths of the tunnel, signalling the start of a sequence that’s all the more effective because of the suspense that came before it.
What we’ve seen is, of course, only a fraction of the finished film. We can’t possibly tell whether the suspense mentioned earlier is sustained effectively across the whole film, or whether the acting in general is as powerful as the performances we saw from Bryan Cranston and Taylor-Johnson. But what we can say is that the preview gave us the impression that Edwards understands what’s required of a great Godzilla movie - not just stuff blowing up, not just a big growling monster stomping through a city, but also drama and a palpable air of menace. The 20 minutes we saw showed plenty of evidence of this.
It presents Godzilla as he should be: big; terrifying; that iconic bellow signalling the presence of a true force of nature.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Jesse Eisenberg Freaks Out In The Double Trailer
In the trailer for The Double, Jesse Eisenberg shows multiple sides to his doppelgangers when he makes moves on Mia Wasikowska.
For fans looking to see Eisenberg stretch his versatility some more in lieu of recent castings, Richard Ayoade’s upcoming The Double may be a good place to start, as Eisenberg plays not only the introverted Simon, but also his doppelganger, James Simon.
Yes, in a stylish new film, from the writer and director of Submarine, comes a picture that visually looks to bend its reality as much as Eisenberg’s presence. As Simon, he is the “creepy guy” that won’t leave Mia Wasikowska alone. Yet, as James he is the charming seducer that will make Simon look all the worse, especially if James Simon is committing crimes with his face. Or is that just Simon?
The Double opens in limited release on May 9, 2014.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
The Purge 2 Gets New Release Date From Universal
The Purge 2 release date has been pushed back by Universal
The release date for The Purge 2, or The Purge: Anarchy, was pushed back from June 20, 2014, to July 18, 2014 by Universal Pictures.
The Purge: Anarchy is the sequel to The Purge, which was made for $3 million and pulled in $34 million. It starred Ethan Hawke and Lena Headey. The first movie centered on a rich family trying to protect themselves when their house is attacked during the
Purge, a twelve hour period of government-sanctioned anarchy. In The Purge 2: Anarchy, the purge continues, but with another family.
The Purge was production house Blumhouse's first collaboration with Universal under a first-look deal. The sequel is being produced by Jason Blum of Blumhouse, Michael Bay's Platinum Dunes Sebastien Lemercier. James DeMonaco, who directed The Purge, returns to sit in the director’s chair for The Purge 2: Anarchy.
SOURCE: IGN
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.
The Enigma of Leonardo DiCaprio
Here's a look at how one of Hollywood's most popular actors has yet to win the big one.
Disqus - noscript
I ask myself this every time he's in a movie, always brilliant and one of the best actors ever. It's amazing he didn't win something for The Departed, Body of Lies, Aviator, Gangs of New York, Blood Diamond, Catch Me if you Can, or any of the other great movies he has been in.
i think his best performance is as Calvin Candie in Django Unchained. I thought he was just as good as Waltz in the film
It's laughable that he lost to Tommy Lee in The Fugitive. Sure, great actor and great film - but not Oscar worthy at all. Leo in Gilbert was spectacular, and at such a young age. He was born to be an actor.
Yeah I'm not going to Deny Leo>Tommy Lee Jones... but I can't see Leo in that role for the Fugitive.
Calvin Candie had no trace of Leonardo DiCaprio, and should have been nominated at the Oscars. According to Jaime Foxx he did not speak to his fellow cast members on filming days in order to inhabit Calvin Candie to the maximum extent. I knew he had acting chops, but goddamn that role just showed how talented he is.
Interview with Jaume Collet-Serra and Joel Silver on Non-Stop
We spoke with the director and producer of Non-Stop on the challenges of filming a picture based on one flight.
Fear of flying is nothing new. In today's world though, that fear is driven by the unknown backgrounds of fellow passengers. "Who is that guy over there nervously shaking his leg? Does he not like to fly, or is he about to jump up with an AK-47 secretly stowed in the lining of the set infront of him?"
Director Jaume Collet-Serra and legendary producer Joel Silver were in NYC recently to supply some answers about bringing this high flying thriller to the big screen.
What was it about the subject matter that piqued your interest?
JC: For me it was the concept. Also the challenge of shooting an entire movie in one set. I think it’s very interesting for a director that enjoys thrillers and mysteries like I do to have the challenge to do that, and so that was the main reason for me, the concept, the air marshal world and also, you know, being afraid of flying just a little bit, and so, I thought that the fragility of the environment, a plane going from New York to London just in the middle of the ocean, if something goes wrong, it could become a very scary place, but I didn’t want to make a movie that was all in your face, hijacking terrorists. I wanted to make a mystery in that environment.
The fight scenes in such close quarters were very impressive. Could you talk about how those were choreographed?
JC: Everything was taken from very reality based conversations with air marshals and the techniques that they use in these scenarios that they dream of, that haven’t happened yet. And so after that research, we sort of discovered that they have a different fighting technique. They have to use more pressure points and little twisting of the hands and things that we show in the movie as ways to subdue passengers, mostly from alcohol related problems. But they have those techniques and Liam is a huge guy. He’s 6’ 4” and for me it just seemed, maybe because I like challenges, a great place to have him fight in a bathroom and it was a challenge for him and for Anson Mount. They both rehearsed for many weeks that fight. What’s not very obvious is that every shot on that fight, the camera is static. It doesn’t move. Everything is done through editing and if you watch it again, you’ll notice there’s over 70 cuts in it and that the fight was shot completely out of order. They never did the whole fight in order because, as you know in films, you have to follow whatever is lit, so we took one wall out, lighting in one direction and we shot all the shots of the fight in that direction and we put that wall back and you pull another wall and you shoot all the shots, so the fight is shot completely out of order for the convenience of the crew and the lighting. So that fight never actually happened. It’s all edited that way.
JS: And to talk to his prowess as a director, there were a lot of times four people in that bathroom because what he did is he did a mirror image of the bathroom, took the mirror out, and so the actors who you were looking at through the mirror, but there was no mirror and then he had two other actors who were kind of facing the actors that were in the mirror. There were four people in there to get that to work, so it was even tighter than it looks. [Laughs]
What were the dimensions of the bathroom you built it?
JC: Pretty accurate to a normal toilet.
Actual size?
JC: Yeah, the only advantage is that we could take two walls out, we could take the mirror out and we could take a hole in another place, in another wall. It was an incredible pain in the ass. [Laughs]It took the whole day to shoot the scene, basically to shoot 40 seconds.
Can you talk about using technology against us? I was really interested in how the text messages appeared on the screen and was wondering how you directed Liam to react to something he wasn’t seeing like that.
JC: The technology thing, again, if you go back to the whole idea that I like thrillers and mysteries, watching the old Hitchcock movies or any movies that you have one character up against some extraordinary circumstance, you always have this scene where he needs to get to a phone to deliver the information and nowadays, there are phones everywhere and there is Google, so you cannot have that scene anymore because usually people have access to phones and all that information, so you always have to use that information against the character. You cannot use it like back in the day as a way out, but now you have to complicate his life through technology and so that’s what I tried to do. Obviously, there are two ways in this movie that it becomes complicated; one because the bad guy communicates through technology to him and another because in a very logical way, the passengers, by trying to communicate to the exterior, complicate things for him. So that, to me, that was an interesting way to use technology.
And the second question, if I hadn’t put the texts on screen, there would have been 150 shots of a phone in the movie. Also we wanted to give personality to the bad guy and then he has to become his own entity and that’s when the texts sort of evolve. In the beginning they’re very static and then they start to move and they become more three-dimensional and all of that. Now, in directing Liam, there were entire minutes where you are on a close-up of Liam and I’m just there talking to him and he memorizes some of the texts and I sometimes tell him what the texts are and now write and now do this. If you see the dailies of it, it makes no sense at all [laughs], but I just need to get the different reactions. And, you know, most importantly, I think that with Liam, when you have a close-up of him, he just gives you everything in such a subtle way, and something that I usually do in that circumstance, I’m there with him. It’s impossible to see the subtleties in a monitor. You have to look at him directly because if not, it’s like, ‘What? You didn’t give me anything.’ I was like, ‘Yeah, yeah. It’s in the dailies.’ [Laughs]
Did anyone get hurt doing the bathroom fight scene?
JC: No, I mean it was so well choreographed, but also Liam has Mark Vanselow who is his stunt double and coordinator who’s there with him, pushing him. Liam does all of his fights, like entirely. He loves it. He rehearsed after 18 hours of shooting or whatever, he still goes and rehearses for the fight, so he loves it, but it’s all about the comfort of how close can my head get to your head, or that was a fake or that was a miss and so it’s the comfort of him without cutting. Like, do it again a bit closer, do it again a bit closer until it gets very close, but no, you work with professional people and, thank god, nothing happens usually.
What were the challenges of shooting in JFK?
JC: Just the time, time of moving the equipment through security. We shot the exterior first, which was easy, you know, because it’s just a normal shooting day, but then we had to wait three hours to walk all the equipment and all the people and everybody in a gate that we had sort of locked, so it was a very long day. It was like a 16-hour day. We knew that that was gonna happen, but there were three hours in the middle of the day that you couldn’t do anything because every single piece of equipment had to go through and everybody had to take their shoes off and the whole thing.
I understand the script was well done when you first received it. How much rewriting did you have to do?
JC: We changed quite a bit of it.
JS: The first draft we got, it was a spec script and it was the concept, which was not really kind of worked out yet, and the person that pushed it along the most is Liam because we have a relationship. We said, ‘This just came in. What are you thinking?’ We thought he’d say, ‘It’s interesting.’ He said, ‘We’ve got to make it now,’ and he said, ‘I’ve never seen this before.’ I mean, yes, it has a Murder on the Orient Express kind of vibe to it, which was written in 1935, and he said, ‘But I think we should do this.’ So we got together and started to craft it and work it. It’s shocking to me that Jaume isn’t more regarded. He’s really a very talented guy, and he had great ideas. The idea of the texting was his idea, how to do this, all that stuff and he really shaped it and, together, we ended up with Liam, his idea was Julianne Moore; all these things came about together. Look, the best thing I can say about this movie, there’s a girl at Universal who is in charge of what they call in LA, the Bel Air Circuit, which is what they call the circuit that people who get to see movies, executives or producers in the community, and she had to watch the movie right when we delivered because they hadn’t really seen it yet, and she sat in the room and watched it and then they do a clone of it so they can make more of them, and she called my office and she said, ‘Is this movie even 90 minutes?’ And I called her back and said, ‘It’s an hour and 50.’ So I like the fact that people feel it was so fast and such a drive to it, that made me very happy.
Joel, can you talk about shooting on film versus digital, and how you see the divide between the two progressing in the future?
JS: Well, I mean, the notion of film versus digital, I’m just going to throw that to my partner here because he has very specific thoughts about it.
JC: I will shoot on film as long as they make it. So far nobody has argued with me about it. To me, it’s not about the quality of the image. To me, it’s about the process. I think that everything changes when it goes through the Mac; it’s cheap. I think people then don’t pay too much importance to the take, if you can do 40 takes. I do three takes and I move on, and if an actor knows that, they will give me three good takes, and that’s the way Liam does it, too. Sometimes we do more takes for technical reasons or if there are children or animals, but if not, we do three takes and we move, and if you are able to do 40 and then erase them or whatever, then it just becomes, I don’t know what it becomes, but it’s not my process, you know? So I think for me, film at least has those boundaries.
How hard is it to work in Hollywood as a Latino?
JC: For me, I moved to Hollywood when I was 18. I never saw it as a disadvantage in any way. Quite the opposite. I think right now producers and studios want to make movies that are more appealing internationally and I think that you have to use your different cultures as an advantage to be able to make those movies.
Mr. Silver, you have a long and distinguished career as a producer of action films. What do you think makes Liam Neeson a particularly strong action star and, at the beginning of his career, did you imagine it would take this turn?
JS: It’s not as if he just became this - he knows his way around a light saber, he was in Star Wars, he was in Batman. He has always had an action element to his career, but it wasn’t until he got on the phone and said to this person, ‘I have a unique skill set and if you don’t give me back my daughter, I’m gonna find you and I’m gonna kill you,’ and when he said that, that gave the audience a view into his psyche that he become an action hero, an action lead. He became somebody that we want to see succeed and do what he wants to do. Look, it’s happening now a lot. Robert Downey Jr. is an actor who was always thought of as a terrific and an incredible actor, but when you put on that Iron Man suit, that combination of the suit and his impression of Tony Stark, that gave the movie resonance and I just did a picture with Sean Penn called The Gunman. These actors who want to put on that mantle of the action hero, they’re game changers. I’ve made a lot of stupid action movies in my life and some, I’m very proud of. Some are pretty stupid, but the reality is, he’s the real deal. You can cut to his face and you can just stay on it. He’s a real deal, and I think that the audience, they root for him and he picks very complicated characters. I mean, this guy, Bill Marks, he’s a troubled guy. You meet him and he’s depressed and he has the history that we don’t really understand and the movie is about redemption, and that already is a unique action movie. I just think that we’re fortunate that guys like Downey and guys like Sean and guys like Liam Neeson want to embrace this medium because for so many years, it was a stupid medium. I think it’s cool that we can take a movie that has very little visual effects. I mean, yes, there’s no plane in the sky, there are no jets, all that stuff is all CGI, but most of this movie is 200 people locked in a set for four months, working through a very complicated story, very complicated characters and taking you guys on a ride that I think is, right now, unusual for movies that are being made today.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Jurassic World Casts Vincent D’Onofrio and Irrfan Khan As Villains
Jurassic World casting Vincent D’Onofrio and Irrfan Khan as … dinosaurs?
Jurassic World’s latest casting news is a bit of a letdown. Vincent D’Onofrio and Indian star Irrfan Khan have been named as the new villains in the prehistoric sequel to Jurassic Park. That excited me because I’ve wanted to see Vincent D’Onofrio play a stegosaurus since he turned a rifle on himself in the Stanley Kubrick masterpiece Full Metal Jacket.
Sadly, upon reading the rest of the release, I learned D’Onofrio is playing a bad guy. I haven’t been this disappointed since I learned that Tara Reid wasn’t playing a shark in Sharknado.
No word yet on who ... or what Khan is playing.
Vincent D’Onofrio and Irrfan Khahn join Bryce Dallas Howard and Chris Pratt in the new generation Jurassic Park franchise. D’Onofria just finished shooting The Judge with Robert Downey Jr. and Robert Duvall. Khan is best known for his big cat nautical adventure Life Of Pi and The Amazing Spider-Man.
Jurassic World is being directed by Colin Trevorrow. Derek Connolly wrote the script. It should hit the screens on June 12, 2015.
SOURCE: Deadline
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.
The Complete List Of 2014 Oscar Winners
The complete list of every single Oscar winners, as well as our thoughts on a few of them!
It’s finally happened! After months, and months, of campaigning dedicated to this coveted golden night for Hollywood, the Oscars have come. And as The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences pick their favorites for the year of 2013, we will be right here to keep you updated about every winner in every category.
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Jared Leto in Dallas Buyers Club
ACHIEVEMENT IN COSTUME DESIGN
The Great Gatsby: Catherine Martin
ACHIEVEMENT IN MAKEUP AND HAIRSTYLING
Dallas Buyers Club: Adruitha Lee and Robin Mathews
BEST ANIMATED SHORT FILM
Mr. Hublot
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM OF THE YEAR
Frozen
ACHIEVEMENT IN VISUAL EFFECTS
Gravity: Tim Webber, Chris Lawrence and Dave Shirk
BEST DOCUMENTARY SHORT SUBJECT
The Lady in Number 6: Music Saved My Life
BEST LIVE ACTION SHORT FILM
Helium
BEST DOCUMENTARY FEATURE
20 Feet from Stardom (RADiUS-TWC)
BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM OF THE YEAR
The Great Beauty
ACHIEVEMENT IN SOUND MIXING
Gravity: Skip Lievsay, Niv Adiri and Christopher Benstead
ACHIEVEMENT IN SOUND EDITING
Gravity: Glenn Freemantle
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Lupita Nyong’o in 12 Years a Slave
ACHIEVEMENT IN CINEMATOGRAPHY
Gravity: Emmanuel Lubezki
ACHIEVEMENT IN FILM EDITING
Gravity: Alfonso Cuarón and Mark Sanger
ACHIEVEMENT IN PRODUCTION DESIGN
The Great Gatsby Production Design: Catherine Martin; Set Decoration: Beverley Dunn
ACHIEVEMENT IN MUSIC WRITTEN FOR MOTION PICTURES (ORIGINAL SCORE)
Gravity Steven Price
ACHIEVEMENT IN MUSIC WRITTEN FOR MOTION PICTURES (ORIGINAL SONG)
“Let It Go” from Frozen
ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
12 Years a Slave Screenplay by John Ridley
ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
Her Written by Spike Jonze
ACHIEVEMENT IN DIRECTING
Gravity: Alfonso Cuarón
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE
Cate Blanchett in Blue Jasmine
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE
Matthew McConaughey in Dallas Buyers Club
BEST MOTION PICTURE OF THE YEAR
12 Years a Slave
The biggest takeaway from tonight's Oscars is that genre is breaking through. It did not win Best Picture, like I suspected, but it surprisingly won Best Director. Alfonso Cuarón won the DGA, and Gravitywon the PGA (not to mention the Golden Globe) prior until tonight, but I personally did not see that genre would take one of the top prizes. And while 12 Years a Slavestill took home Best Picture (deservedly so in my opinion), but Cuarón triumphed in Achievement in Direction. The fact that he directed a stand-alone sci-fi film that does not have a combined $3 billion prestige franchise behind him (like fantasy's breakthrough win for Peter Jackson with The Lord of the Rings: Return of the Kingenjoyed a deacde ago) is monumental. It demonstrates a changing of the guard in Academy values.
Similarly, Spike Jonze winning his first overdue Oscar equally represents a changing of values. Jonze, a music video director of indie sensibilities, has not gone mainstream with his love story about a man who romances what is essentially an iPhone. Yet, the Academy crica 2014 found it worthwhile to award for Best Original Screenplay. Like Cuarón's win, a shift of values in our more mainstream geek culture is indicative.
Meanwhile, some old standards remain. Lupita Nyong’o also deserved her Oscar. However, it also marked America Sweetheart Jennifer Lawerence not winning back-to-back. The Oscar "turn" base system remains in tact, and the shooting star nicknamed J. Law may have to wait longer before she enjoys the winning spotlight on the Academy stage again.
No matter what, it was a great night (even if the hosting was not) that offered a few surprises and actual competition. Love or hate the Oscars, everyone should be happy to let it go this year.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.
The Grand Budapest Hotel Review
The Grand Budapest Hotel is a splendid affair, as well as Wes Anderson's most ambitious (and haunted) effort to date.
Wes Anderson’s The Grand Budapest Hotel is a cinematic confection so sumptuously decadent that, like the titular resort, it must be savored and dined within repeatedly. Exceedingly gracious, Anderson throws out the most inviting red carpet and exquisite beguilements with his reliable repertory of A-list talent. Yet, there is something haunted waiting in the wings about the stately affair; the Matryoshka doll-like narrative, maintaining the expected hilarity associated with its auteur, ultimately reveals a contrastive element to the splendor. Simply put, The Grand Budapest Hotel is Anderson’s most ambitious film to date, lingering in your presence long after check out.
Inspired partially by the writings of Stefan Zweig, The Grand Budapest Hotel imagines the fictional European nation of Zubrowka, likely located somewhere between Vienna and the land of Lord Mandrake’s birth, on the eve of fascism. However, the political climate of the era bothers M. Gustave (Ralph Fiennes) little since he must perform his duties as concierge with as much glamour as the ostentatious hotel situated in the height of the Alps. An effete man, M. Gustave still rules his hotel with a velvet glove, which compliments his consummately dapper, plum attire. It is accommodation in the morning for the guests, and scripture (as according to the Book of Gustave) for the staff at night, with maybe just a little bit of time for canoodling the oldest of visiting matrons during after-hours (Gustave is a man of many contradictions).
And yet, the story is not his. Despite dominating the narrative, these 1930s shenanigans are relayed through the devoted eyes of Gustave’s newest bellboy, Zero Moustafa (Tony Revolori), who is recounting these events 30 years on, after he has become the owner of the no longer "Grand" Budapest Hotel. An undocumented immigrant who fled wars in the Middle East, Moustafa follows Gustave rapturously, even after the concierge finds himself as the guest for an extended stay at a nearby correctional institution. It is all an unfortunate misunderstanding due to the death of Gustave’s recent gray conquest, Madame D. (Tilda Swinton), who has departed under mysterious circumstances and whose son, Dmitri (Adrian Brody), fingered Gustave as the murderer. Gustave impulsively taking the Madame’s priceless Renaissance painting, “Boy With Apple,” after she willed it to him probably did not help this situation. Soon, Zero and his whirlwind soulmate, Agatha (Saoirse Ronan), are planning for Gustave’s release, and a civilized adventure is undertaken to clear the blood splotch by Gustave’s good name.
Actors go their whole careers searching for roles like M. Gustave. The personification of incongruity, Gustave is a wonderful creation that Fiennes illuminates in his first collaboration with Anderson. A figure who can demand both perfection from his employees, but also on occasion swear like a sailor and mispronounce the word fillet, Gustave is too smooth by half and initially seems the grifter who smiles his way into old ladies’ pockets like Zero Mostel. However, just as Gustave’s soft gestures mislead one to doubt the levels of his determination and even bravery, so too do his experienced tastes contradict a man who is simply a step out of time. Like his shimmering hotel, the flashback journey to the 1930s still leaves Gustave feeling a man too late to the game of life. Gustave and the Budapest probably would have been more at home in the Belle Époque period than in a time when each nearing death is more grisly than the last.
This incredible character study is achieved in part because The Grand Budapest Hotel is the most fully realized world yet constructed from Wes Anderson’s imagination. He has assuredly built his own pocket universes before, as seen in the adoring public for the wunderkind family of The Royal Tenenbaums and the sheer fact that The Life Aquatic’s Steve Zissou could be a hit documentarian filmmaker. Nonetheless, there is an entire fictional history built around the Grand Budapest and the greater alpine utopia of Zubrowka. From the history of the transitioning government officials, epitomized by the truly sociable fascist Capt. Albert Henckels (Edward Norton), to the legendary baked artworks of Mendl’s, where Agatha works, it is a detailed kingdom built in the bubbly pastels of Anderson’s well-known hand.
Thus, Anderson’s intentional departure from this early splendor is all the more fascinating. The director half-jokingly told me that it’s because this is his first movie with an actual bit of plot, yet there is more to it than that. The Grand Budapest Hotel intricately examines the prisms of nostalgia that deceptively bind all things together. By its definition, nostalgia imagines a world more perfect than the present due to forced perspective, but early 1930s Europe at best could be seen as the deep breath before the plunge into the continent’s darkest hour. After all, the credited Zweig, a literary giant of his time who ran in the same circles as Freud, took his own life in 1942 over a depression from the seemingly unending spread of Nazism. While this movie avoids those downer inclinations, it is told in a carefully constructed artifice dependent on multiple unreliable narrators.
The film itself begins with a modern young woman reading a novel by an author, who published the book in 1985, based on his chance encounter with an older Moustafa (F. Murray Abraham) in 1969. Only in the author’s literary retelling of that conversation do we travel to the time of M. Gustave and his relatively wacky adventures circa 1932. Each era is brilliantly complimented with a contrasting color palate and even aspect ratio. The modern era is in the common theatrical ratio of 1.85:1, while the aspect ratio explodes into true widescreen 2.35:1 for the heyday of 1960s CinemaScope, before culminating in the classic 1.33:1 Hollywood standard of yesteryear. The tone of each transition matches accordingly. The sequences in the 1960s are drab and deliberately paced with the lyricism of a writer (personified in these scenes by Jude Law), but the movie becomes as brisk as the early 1930s talkies under Gustave’s stewardship. The washed out garish ‘60s oranges are replaced by the colors of royalty, red and purple, and Gustave is a king on his small hill. The accuracy of any of these exploits thusly comes into question when the full frame version of a hotel lobby deliberately evokes Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining.
Yet, for whatever other influences, many of them including Ernst Lubitsch and very early Billy Wilder, my mind is repeatedly drawn to the shocking thriller elements apparent throughout the story. By the third act, comedy is edged into the periphery when there are several sequences that take on a Hitchcockian quality; one in particular is inspired by a scene from Torn Curtain (1966) with violence that is more than complimentary to this European moment. Predators stalk prey through charmingly elegant death traps and for the first time, formal niceties are strikingly absent.
Still, this movie remains at its core a brilliant Wes Anderson creation. The vibrant color scheme of this country and the muted restraint of nearly every actor, each speaking with their own authentic accent, forms a world entirely fabricated, but inherently true. For over a decade, it has been Anderson’s way to reflect a beautifully photographed and precisely realized laugh out of the chaotic mess that is our reality. But with The Grand Budapest Hotel, there is something more acute and painful about that vision, a hypnotic carousal that knowingly, and abruptly, must end before such a story can ever truly begin.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Disqus - noscript
I know it was a small movie but I still think one of my favorites of the year was "Mud."
I greatly enjoyed Mud myself, but it like a few other gems (such as Side Effects, Don Jon, etc.) just did not quite make the cut for me when compared to other films from the year. Thanks for the comment!