Quantcast
Channel: Movies – Den of Geek
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live

Idris Elba Cast As Villain in Disney's The Jungle Book

$
0
0
NewsRobert Bernstein3/7/2014 at 7:37AM

Actor Idris Elba has been cast as Shere Khan in Disney's upcoming The Jungle Book...

Actor Idris Elba (Pacific Rim, Prometheus) has been cast to play the villain for Disney's The Jungle Book.

Deadline is reporting that Elba will play the role of Shere Khan, the villainous bengal tiger for the life-action/VFX hybrid film. Khan will stalk young Mowgli after deciding to kill him before he becomes too much of a threat.

The actor was most recently seen in Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom as late South African leader Nelson Mandela, and will soon be seen in Beasts of No Nation, a drama based on a child soldier fighting in the civil war of an African country.

Elba is the first actor to be attached to The Jungle Book, and news of his casting is sure to help bring in other high-end talent.

The VFX will be overseen by Oscar-winner Rob Legato, the man behind VFX for such films as Avatar, Hugo, and The Titanic. Disney's The Jungle Book movie update will be directed by Jon Favreau (Iron Man).

The description of Elba's role as the classic bengal tiger alone makes the movie feel like it might take a more serious tone than what we've seen in the past instead of the more musical route the classic animated film took.  The only question is just how dark Disney is looking to go.

Warner Bros. is also looking to adapt The Jungle Book, but hit a speed bump when director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu bowed out of the project. Now, Ron Howard is rumored to be onboard.

Disney's The Jungle Book is currently scheduled to be released on October 9, 2015.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


Darkman: Sam Raimi's Twisted Superhero

$
0
0
FeatureDon Kaye3/7/2014 at 8:13AM
Darkman

Once upon a time, there were barely any superhero movies. But Sam Raimi wanted to make his own, so he made Darkman.

Flush off the cult success of Evil Dead and Evil Dead 2: Dead by Dawn, young independent director Sam Raimi set his sights on making a superhero movie…of sorts. The result was Darkman, a twisted horror/action hybrid that featured a young Liam Neeson and ended up plumbing much darker psychological depths than even Tim Burton’s Batman -- the only big superhero blockbuster around at the time -- while giving Raimi’s bizarre sense of madcap humor a bigger playground to romp around in.

With Darkman arriving last week in a deluxe Blu-ray edition from Scream Factory (and damn it all if this company isn’t simply the Criterion Collection of hi-def horror/sci-fi archival titles at this point), it’s been a great time to look back at the picture, its place in Raimi’s filmography and its context in the pantheon of modern superhero movies – where, it can be argued, it provided at least part of the template for many of the angst-ridden crime fighters we’ve been given in the last 20 years, from Raimi’s own Spider-Man to Nolan’s Batman to various Marvel heroes.

Raimi made Darkman because, as a relatively unknown filmmaker, no one would give him the rights to make The Shadow or Batman even though he pursued both. In Bruce Campbell's memoir If Chins CouldKill, Raimi told his longtime collaborator, "I really wanted to make The Shadow. But Universal Studios wouldn't give me the rights to that. I met with them, but they didn't like my views at all, so I went, 'I'm just gonna write my own superhero.'"

In a 23-minute vintage interview included on the Blu-ray, Raimi explains that the source of the film was a short story he wrote and later expanded into a film treatment about a man who is robbed of his face and must therefore wear the faces of others. If he couldn’t adapt an existing superhero to film, he would simply make one up on his own.


Darkman

The criminals came later, as did the relationship with loving girlfriend Julie (played by Frances McDormand), and it’s clear that no matter what the original inspiration was, Darkman is very much a superhero origin story. But it’s a demented one: Neeson’s nerdy but heartfelt scientist, Peyton Westlake, is burned alive by the villain’s henchmen, presumed dead, yet returns with the help of some convenient experimental surgery (he’s presumed to be a near-death hobo by Jenny Agutter in a brief cameo as the doctor who operates on him) that renders him impervious to pain and super-strong. His once-handsome face is turned into a mass of oozing scar tissue, and the same could be said for his psyche. Even the synthetic flesh that he was working on before his “death,’ from which he creates his false faces, lasts just 99 minutes.

Westlake goes pretty bonkers in Darkman, and his sole motivations are revenge against the super-villain Durant (Larry Drake as one of the most original bad guys of the last 25 years) and the restoration of his romance with Julie. Justice for those who have none or cleaning up the streets or avenging the suffering of the human race never enters into the picture – Peyton’s agenda is almost as self-serving as that of corrupt real estate mogul Strack (an oily Colin Friels), who is the film’s real evil power.

Darkman has perhaps the darkest and weirdest look into a superhero’s mind ever committed to film. Peyton has several psychotic breaks and/or hallucinations, and he has no compunction at all about killing people outright (sticking Ted Raimi’s head through the top of a manhole so that it gets squished by oncoming traffic is a personal favorite). Even though Peyton has been irrevocably changed by the end of the film, following Raimi’s version of the superhero arc, it’s not clear as we fade to black whether he is going to continue battling bad guys or not.


Darkman

Universal Pictures, seeing the money pouring into Warner Bros.’ bank account from the success of Batman, was eager to get behind Raimi's vision, greenlighting the film for around $12 million (the budget later ballooned to a reported $16 million). But Raimi told Campbell that getting the film up and running within the studio system was a long, torturous process: "It took just forever for them to green-light the script -- I went years," he recalled. "Finally, I said, 'If I don't get a call saying that the movie's finally going to go, because I've spent three years of my life on this thing and it's not like I'm trying to make an art picture, I'm selling out to you -- if you don't call me by ten o'clock, I'm out.' Ten o'clock came and went and I had a bottle of champagne and I went, 'Fine, at least I'm free of it.' They called around eleven: 'All right, we'll make your movie.' They really make sure they've messed with ya."

Finally given the backing of a major studio and all the toys and resources that entailed, Raimi nevertheless kept Darkman very much within his personal style, albeit a bit subdued from the Evil Dead films. His camera tilts and swings crazily all over the place as images pile atop each other and garishly lit sets and figures fill up the screen. Raimi utilized a comic book aesthetic on his early films and, with Darkman, got to make an actual comic book movie, even though the book itself didn’t exist. The movie has the visual feel of a comic book, colors and images leaping and splashing constantly across the screen, a seamless extension of the director’s already anarchic style.

Anchoring the movie and giving it humanity is Neeson himself. He plays Peyton’s sensitive, wounded side and his unstable, ghoulishly manic personality with equal commitment, throwing himself into a highly intense performance that requires his face to be either swaddled in filthy bandages or buried in ten separate pieces of prosthetic makeup. Neeson leaves it all on Raimi’s playing field, showcasing the range that would serve the actor well in movies as disparate as Schindler’s List and Taken.

Less impressive is McDormand, with whom Raimi reportedly clashed on set. Campbell recalled in his book supervising an awkward looping session for the actress, who realized that two of her most dramatic scenes -- including a "big speech" in Darkman's lab -- were not in the cut she was watching. As a result, the actress (who went on to win an Best Actress Oscar for her work in Fargo) appeared on screen at least to grapple with an inconsistently written role. On the other hand, Drake’s coiled, sadistic and well-spoken Durant is a knockout and well worthy of being included in any pantheon of memorable screen super-villains.

Darkman’s mix of action heroics, horror imagery and zany comedy was – and still may be – ahead of its time. In some ways, it’s one of the most pure comic book movies ever made. Its darker, more violent impulses have certainly found their way into the superhero movies of the last 17 years, while its more humorous, wacky touches are almost solely Raimi’s alone. That mix left Universal Studios uneasy, and a series of very poor test screenings didn’t help matters. With the movie receiving some of the worst test scores the studio had ever seen, it forced Raimi to take out some of his wilder footage (which sadly doesn’t show up on the new Blu-ray).

Nevertheless, a strong marketing campaign helped push Darkman into financial success, with the film debuting at Number One at the box office in its first week of release ("I couldn't believe that we had the Number One movie," Raimi told Campbell) and earning $49 million around the world. It also strengthened Raimi’s status as one of the pre-eminent cult filmmakers of his time – although true mainstream success eluded him for another 12 years when, at long last, he got the chance to direct Spider-Man, which grossed more than $800 million around the world and pushed superhero movies into the realm of blockbusters.


Darkman

Darkman is still a subversive, sly and thoroughly entertaining blast today. Some of the effects, visuals and filmmaking techniques can’t help but look dated 24 years later – especially given the clarity of Scream Factory’s hi-def transfer, which actually diminishes some of the film’s original grain and texture. And while Raimi’s crazier sensibilities are enjoyable, they don’t always make for good traveling companions with the more horrific aspects of the story. But the movie hums with the gleeful, chaotic energy of the early Raimi that is missing from turgid dreck like Oz, the Great and Powerful, which plays like the work of an anonymous studio hire.

Scream Factory’s Darkman Blu-ray comes packed with all the usual great bonus features we’ve come to expect, including new interviews with Neeson, McDormand, and Drake (all of whom remember the film quite fondly, especially Neeson), chats with the supporting henchmen, even more interviews with the production and makeup designers, plus vintage featurettes and interviews from the film’s release, including that old Raimi interview. Unfortunately Raimi doesn’t contribute any new insights or commentary about his creation, which ended up spawning two direct-to-video sequels (which the director had no involvement with) and even an unaired TV pilot.

“I’m everyone. I’m no one. Everywhere. Nowhere. Call me ‘Darkman.’” That’s as good a superhero credo as any.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

10 Sequels to Movies Where The Original Cast Was Killed

$
0
0
The ListsGabe Toro3/7/2014 at 8:14AM

This weekend's 300: Rise of an Empire miraculously continues the story of 300 Spartans...after they all died. But they are not the first.

This week, Sparta lives again with 300: Rise of an Empire. But how does it make sense that there’s a sequel? Didn’t Leonidas and company bite the dust at the end of the first one?

This isn’t the first time a sequel has been made from a film where the main characters died. While Rise of an Empire presents a series of battles occurring during Xerxes’ siege on Leonidas’ 300, this approach alone isn’t the only way to revisit old stomping grounds where your favorite characters have died. Here are ten sequels that basically ignore everyone dying at the end of the first film.

There be spoilers ahead.


return of the living dead

Return Of The Living Dead Part 2 (1988)

At the end of Return Of The Living Dead, itself loosely based on Night Of The Living Dead, the town is nuked and the Trioxin spill theoretically contained, leading us to assume that we won’t be meeting anyone from the first film; pleasantly, the filmmakers suggest that the leads are related to a wise and bumbling morgue attendant played by Clu Gulager. The sequels lack any real connective tissue until part five, and fans of the first film were likely pretty confused.


Evil Dead 2

Evil Dead 2 (1987)

Ah, the completely nonsensical approach. At the end of the first film, Ash (Bruce Campbell) frees himself from the cabin, but the evil omnipotent Force attacks him, and we’re led to believe that’s the last we’ve seen of him. A supersized sequel, however, basically re-did the ending of the first film and rewrote around that final attack, keeping Ash alive for future installments. But if you went back to the ‘80s to watch this incredible movie with fans, it’s likely you’d be vexed by how Ash is still walking around.


Predator 2

Predator 2 (1990)

 Arnold, Carl Weathers, Sonny Landham, Jesse Ventura, Bill Duke… you just can’t recreate that collection of badasses, especially with Arnold surviving to do one-on-one battle with the beast, only one of them walking away victorious. Of course, this is an alien race that we don’t recognize, and you’d forgive people for watching the first film and thinking, this guy is the only one of his kind. Predator 2 ups the ante by hinting there’s more than one out there watching us lowly humans. But it also tries to replace Arnold with Danny Glover and company, and that’s not gonna work well with anyone.

[related article: 300: Rise of an Empire Review]


Hostel 2

Hostel Part 2  (2007)

At the end of the first picture, Paxton (Jay Hernandez) is the only innocent survivor from the film to attempt to get away. But you never feel comfortable about where he’s going, so at the start of the second film, Eli Roth will not let Paxton get far, summarily dispatching of him in gruesome details like a hair has just been plucked. The rest of the story couldn’t be further from the odyssey in the original.


i still know what you did last summer

I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1997)

Audiences jumped from their seats with the dark ending of I Know What You Did Last Summer when the killer reached out and slaughtered our heroine Julie Jones (Jennifer Love Hewitt) in crashing suddenness. But the sequel attempts one of the cheapest strategies known to man: the end of that first movie was a dream. Ugh.


Demons 2

Demons 2 (1986)

The hook of Demons, a zombie thriller made perversely good by a rockin’ soundtrack, is that they’re all facing the undead while inside a movie theater. That one saw its characters not even as winners, but as knee-jerk goofballs. But in the sequel, the demons wage war against people in a high rise, destroying parties and attacking on all terrain. The movie treats the events of the first film as a terrible isolated incident, requiring that we not think too hard about continuity.


blair witch 2

Blair Witch: Book Of Shadows (2000)

A similar approach took hold here, particularly because that first film was based on the idea of the actors lost and murdered in the forest, never to be found again. The second film, however, takes place in our world, surmising that the occurrences in the first movie were just a movie. It’s a nice dodge for a not-great movie, a way to avoid criticisms that they’re just doing the same thing again.


Alien resurrection

Alien: Resurrection (1997)

At the end of Alien 3, it seems like it’s all over: Ripley is the last of any actual characters in the first two films, and she flings herself into industrial lava to eliminate the alien brood inside her. Science has ways of bringing people back, but this seemed like a defiant way to end this series. But the fourth film solves this problem by cloning the character in the distant future, tossing her into a mess with characters similar to her shipmates in earlier films. Ripley might have been a different woman, but the spirit of the original films remained (at least cosmetically), even if the fourth picture was the fans’ least-liked.


crank 2 high voltage

Crank: High Voltage (2009)

The first Crank ends with Chev Chelios’ body flying towards the earth out of a helicopter, where his body lands ungracefully, smacking onto the concrete. The brief moment where he blinks is just a tease: Crank feels like a cartoon, but when people die, they’re gone, and Chelios could never survive a fall that far. Sure enough, the second movie begins by fudging the logistics there, implying that we haven’t seen anything quite yet from the unkillable hero.


escape from planet of the apes

Escape From The Planet Of The Apes (1971)

 The undisputed king of this trend, this Apes film had the distinction of following Beneath The Planet Of The Apes, which is quite a doozy for any franchise: at the end of the previous movie, Earth is nuked, and all the characters from the first two films are dead. But wait! This one retcons earlier pictures by seeing Cornelius, Dr. Milo, and Dr. Zira create a space ship out of the broken scraps from the first movie and traversing a black hole in Earth’s absence, visiting a time when the ape was still a slave.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

The first paragraph makes no sense.
300 sequel does not ''miraculously'' continue the story of the 300 Spartans.
300: Rise of an Empire is a story about ATHENIAN warriors, not Spartans.

Mr Peabody & Sherman review

$
0
0
ReviewSimon Brew3/7/2014 at 10:36AM

DreamWorks revives two loveable characters from the 1960s in the animated film, Mr Peabody & Sherman. Here's Simon's review...

Mr Peabody & Sherman finds DreamWorks Animation in an odd position, with its usual Midas touch at the box office seemingly not what it was. The terrific Rise Of The Guardians struggled, Turbo even more so, and whilst The Croods did good business, How To Train Your Dragon 2 can't come along fast enough.

But before then there's Mr Peabody & Sherman, a decade-long labour of love from The Lion King's co-director, Rob Minkoff. Based on the Peabody's Improbable History moments that were broadcast as part of The Rocky And Bullwinkle Show, the key idea is that Mr Peabody is a genius dog, who adopts a boy by the name of Sherman. After all, argues the film, if a boy can adopt a dog, why can't a dog adopt a boy? We'll leave that to Social Services to sort out.

It proves to be helpful having a genius dog as one of the two lead characters in a big movie though, as it allows it a well-implemented educational element, without it becoming overbearing and scaring people away. Courtesy of a time machine known as the WABAC, Mr Peabody and Sherman find themselves zipping throughout various moments in history, meeting historical characters, and subtly giving the younger members of the audience an introduction to things they may not be aware of.

Choosing wisely what to explain and what to leave alone, Mr Peabody & Sherman thus gets off to a riproaring start, throwing in science jokes, good characterisation and a generous dose of entertainment. Furthermore, Mr Peabody has an exquisite line in puns, bad jokes that any father would be proud of telling, and his gags are hard not to grin at.

When it's focused on the relationship between dog and son, and when it's visiting the likes of the Trojan War and Leonardo da Vinci painting the Mona Lisa, the film is strong. It certainly had us at the mix of science, history and puns that it blends together well.

What doesn't work anywhere near so well, however, is the character of Penny. She's Sherman's classmate at the start of the film, and she's particularly unpleasant too. In fact, she's pretty vile to him, and the film, for us, never bridges why they would start to become friendlier as it progresses. Certainly there are circumstances that throw them together where they need to help each other out, but it's never convincing as to why that then develops into something more.

And that's a problem, as for periods of time, Mr Peabody & Sherman shifts away from the bountiful relationship between the two title characters, and zooms in on Sherman and Penny instead. These are the parts of the film where it's hard to really root for it: we'd been put off Penny so much early on (even though, to the film's credit, it does explain why she's so horrible to Sherman), that we didn't really want Sherman to be her friend.

Furthermore, the inevitable last act big blockbuster sequence - while impressive to look at - again feels less interesting than what's led to it. Because for long periods, Mr Peabody & Sherman has the nerve to go with unfussy, classy animation, and two unconventional characters talking. By distance, those were our favourite moments. A quick nod too to some terrific voice work, particularly in the supporting cast. Leslie Mann, Allison Janney, Stephen Toblowsky and Mel Brooks flesh the cast out well, and Ty Burrell's tones are a suitably fit for a canine genius.

A bit of a mix this one, then. There's plenty to like about Mr Peabody & Sherman, a film that toys with taking some unconventional roads, albeit eventually going through similar motions come the end as any number of other movies you could mention. If the film does, however, give DreamWorks enough change in its tin, it'd be interesting to meet the two lead characters again, exploring a bit more history as they do so. We'd be grateful if they could leave Penny to find someone new to pick on, though.

Mr Peabody And Sherman is out now in the UK and opens in the US on March 7th.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

3 New Clips From The Amazing Spider-Man 2

$
0
0
TrailerDavid Crow3/7/2014 at 11:06AM
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Green Goblin

Check out three new clips from The Amazing Spider-Man 2 that reveal new story elements, footage, and Stan "The Narrator" Lee!

Compliments of Kellogg and their “Kellogg’s The Amazing Spider-Man 2: The Web-slinging Game” we have three new sizzle reels from The Amazing Spider-Man 2, complete with voice over narration by the one and only Stan Lee.

These short but sweet clips offer fans more than a few new glimpses of footage, as well as context (the Rhino is stealing plutonium? Great Scott!!) for scenes that we already know about. But don’t take our word for it, true believers!

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 finds Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) fighting for his life against Oscorp’s newest freaks, including Electro (Jamie Foxx) and Rhino (Paul Giamatti), all while trying to balance a high school romance with Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone). Yet, when an old friend named Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan) comes back into his life, the secrets of Norman Osborn (Chris Cooper) and its villainous past reach closer to home than even Spidey can realize. Worse still, they may expand into his future.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 opens May 2, 2014.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

New Black Widow Featurette For Captain America: The Winter Soldier

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow3/7/2014 at 11:32AM
Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow in Iron Man 2

In the newest video from Captain America: The Winter Soldier, a spotlight is cast on Black Widow and her unlikely friendship with Cap.

It may be called Captain America: The Winter Soldier, but one of the biggest deals about Marvel Studio’s latest effort is who Cap will be teaming up with from SHIELD this time, and none are more anticipated than the return of Scarlett Johansson as the Black Widow.

In the newest featurette, compliments of Entertainment Tonight, fans are keyed into how much of the Cap sequel will feature the budding Odd Couple relationship between squeaky clean Captain America and a woman who makes her living by trading secrets and death in the shadows. Together, they make up a sizable fraction of The Avengers, ready for action in 2014!

Captain America: The Winter Soldier stars Chris Evans, Anthony Mackie, Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Robert Redford, and Samuel L. Jackson, and its own winter comes April 4, 2014 in the U.S.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Deliver Us From Evil Scares Up New Trailer

$
0
0
TrailerTony Sokol3/7/2014 at 2:32PM

You haven’t seen true evil until you’ve seen Deliver Us From Evil

There are two kinds of evil. The things men do and the things men think when we see Olivia Munn. The trailer for Deliver Us From Evil explains that it’s the secondary evil that creeps up under the bed.

If you think you’ve seen some horrible things, nothing that can't be explained by human nature, then you haven't seen true evil. It pops up in the mirror while you’re checking for monsters under your daughter’s bed.

The official synopsis for Deliver Us From Evil says “New York police officer Ralph Sarchie (Eric Bana), struggling with his own personal issues, begins investigating a series of disturbing and inexplicable crimes.  He joins forces with an unconventional priest (Edgar Ramírez), schooled in the rituals of exorcism, to combat the frightening and demonic possessions that are terrorizing their city.  Inspired by the book, which details Sarchie’s bone-chilling real-life cases.”

Deliver Us From Evil stars Eric Bana, Edgar Ramirez, Olivia Munn, Sean Harris and Joel McHale. It was directed by Scott Derrickson who also directed The Exorcism of Emily Rose and Sinister.

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Marc Webb chats about The Amazing Spider-Man 2

$
0
0
NewsGlen Chapman3/10/2014 at 8:10AM

Director Marc Webb addresses the criticism that The Amazing Spider-Man 2 has too many villains in it.

We're just over a month away from the release of The Amazing Spider-Man 2, which sees Andrew Garfield reprising the role of the world's most famous webslinger. Inevitably, there's been quite a lot of chatter about the movie as its unveiling gets closer and closer. And there's been concern raised over just how many villains appear to be populating the movie.

After all, there's Jamie Foxx playing Electro, Paul Giamatti as Rhino, Chris Cooper as Norman Osborn, Dane DeHaan as Harry Osborn (and alter ego), and further hints at Doctor Octopus and Vulture. How do you fit that lot in?

Well, whilst attending SXSW, director Marc Webb has been addressing these concerns. "We're obviously familiar with the complaints people had. We're very careful to make sure the stories intertwine", he told The Hollywood Reporter. "For Peter Parker, it's very important that you create obstacles that are difficult to overcome... I'm going to embrace the spectacle. I'm not going to be beholden to smallness. I want it to be fantastic, to be big, to command and express that feeling when you're a kid and reading the comics".

Webb added that Giamatti's The Rhino would only be appearing in the film for "four minutes". That would tie in with the suggestion that this is very much a film that sets up further chapters of the story, and the already-confirmed spin-off movies.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 has a release date of April 18th in the UK.

The Hollywood Reporter

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

 


Liam Neeson explains why he turned down James Bond

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew3/10/2014 at 8:15AM

Liam Neeson was linked to the role of James Bond in the 1990s - and here's why he resisted it...

We missed this story, which popped up in the Hull Daily Mail the week before last. But we suspect that many of you may have missed it too, and thought you may be interested.

While promoting his new hit movie Non-Stop, Liam Neeson chatted about the role of James Bond, with which he was heavily linked in the 1990s. "I was heavily courted, let's put if that way, and I'm sure some other actors were too", he said.

So why did he turn it down?

"It was about 18 or 19 years ago, and my wife-to-be said 'if you play James Bond we're not getting married. And I had to take that on board, because I did want to marry her!'"

Neeson's of course referring to Natasha Richardson, who he went on to marry, and the two were married from 1994 through to her tragic death in 2009.

As we charted in this feature here, Neeson was in line for a second remake of Thunderball, under the guidance of Kevin McClory, that would have been an 'unofficial' James Bond movie. But it all never came to pass.

Non-Stop, meanwhile, has already taken over $50m at the US box office, and marks his latest action thriller hit.

Here's the full interview at the Hull Daily Mail.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

 

Jeff Goldblum Interview: Grand Budapest Hotel, Jurassic World, and The Fly!

$
0
0
InterviewDon Kaye3/10/2014 at 8:51AM

The legendary Jeff Goldblum chats about returning to the world of Wes Anderson and what’s up with Independence Day and Jurassic World.

In Wes Anderson’s The Grand Budapest Hotel, his second collaboration with the director, actor Jeff Goldblum plays Deputy Vilmos Kovacs, an important attorney representing the estate of the late Madame D. (Tilda Swinton). It’s her passing that sets off a chain of events both whimsical and sinister, all set in the glorious title hotel against the backdrop of fascism’s malevolent march across Eastern Europe.

Kovacs, with his Freud-like beard and dignified air, represents the respect for law and adherence to honor that, it is implied, will soon get swept away by a dark tide of evil in Anderson’s fantastical alternate history of a sophisticated, civilized and beauty-minded European culture that existed for a moment between world wars.

The role is just the latest in a long line of indelible performances from the Pittsburgh-born Goldblum, whose 40-year career has seen him careen from character actor to leading man to TV detective to, improbably, sci-fi icon in movies like The Fly, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Independence Day and the first two Jurassic Park films. Those latter two franchises are on their way back to screens, and I spoke with Goldblum about those and working in Wes Anderson’s universe again when he and I sat down recently at a hotel in Beverly Hills.

Den Of Geek: Were you looking forward to working with Wes again at some point after doing The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou?

Jeff Goldblum:  Yeah. Like many other wonderful actors I think a lot of actors love him. He’s a serious and important moviemaker and artist. I think those are the kind of directors you’re dying to work with. Something where the movie turns out good, you know. Plus I was thrilled because I had a great time being around him and working with him and doing Life Aquaticten years ago. He was very spectacular and generous...he’s so enjoyable and, you know, works in this unique spectacularly creative way. So that when I got the email that said, “Hey, I’ve written this script and there’s this part, Kovacs, I think that’s you,” it was a very thrilling occurrence. And I read it and yeah, not only did I love that, I loved the script, but who was also going to be in it and, my gosh, it’s a dreamy opportunity. And I think a lot of actors would run to do that because he’s great to work with and very actorly finally.

Everyone talks about the level of detail in his films. What’s it like as an actor to walk on the set and have that level of everything being so precisely detailed? How does it help?

I think it helps because if you’re an enthusiastic fellow like me – I’m a fan of that. Adam Stockhausen is the production designer and I was there while they were building out of this department store the different ages of this hotel. It was absolutely thrilling to be part of it. It’s like going into a Wes Anderson installation museum and you go around and it’s like, you know, you can’t stop doing that and going, “Wow, that’s a thing.”  And then Milena Canonero is the costume person with whom he has collaborated and made these things, these art pieces and all the extras. You’re going, “Wow.” It’s just thrilling. So that helps because you’re already very enrolled in it and wildly enthusiastic and touched by and thrilled to be part of this thing.

How does he work with the actors on a personal, one-to-one level?

He wants the shooting itself to be an art piece of, you know, moment to moment beauty. So these people that are handpicked and then the crew who gets handpicked for their humanity and excellence are all there making this thing. I think purposely we were all set up in this hotel, we took over this hotel so it’s a kind of not traditional movie where there are big actors in it with trailers. You’re kind of invited to be part of this communal handcrafted camp experience.

So he and the other actors -- you know, Ralph Fiennes and these fine artists are there doing something they’re passionate about and trying to get right and he’s in a condition on the set of kind of blissful focus. So it’s just up my alley, everything I aspire to and want to be around. And then the process feels very actorly. He gets terrific actors to obviously to be part of it because my experience is that it’s just a very creative – it’s just the kind of thing that I love.

A month before they started shooting I visited with Milena Canonero and saw this drawing of the character which was already fully envisioned with my face on it. We tried on different jackets and things and hats and glasses, from which she then built with her great team of artists the clothes. That was a great experience. Then Wes and I went over all the material -- he had ideas and we talked about things and what I was thinking and feeling. All actorly things on how to find the story that I thought was under the surface. He intended Kovacs to be a guy who has some kind of burgeoning heroism in him, and it’s called to the surface in this time of crisis, you know, continent wise and worldwide and family wise.


Kovacs feels like he's one of the last men standing against this tide of darkness that’s creeping across the land. Is that something that felt relevant to the modern world for you as well?

Yeah. I can start crying any moment thinking about it. I think it’s always and certainly now as relevant an issue as ever, you know. That seems to be a recurring challenge in life in the species to bring beauty and graciousness and elegance and love to a world which has challenging elements of greed and darkness of one kind or another. And you have to take sides finally. Everything you do is finally going to be political and impactful in one way or another. And you have to be as awakened as you can to what your life means and what it will contribute and what you’re doing and yeah, figure out what side you’re on. Sometimes it’s difficult to know what the most effective thing is. That’s a wonderful thing that the movie is about, yeah, that I find very touching and important.

What else did you do to prepare? Did you read the Stefan Zweig stories that were an inspiration to Wes?

Yep, read some of that of which I was not aware. I love to be educated by all these opportunities and Wes is a great, wise professor. So it was a great thing seeing what he was up to with this, particularly with all his other knowledge of movies that I’m always interested in. He had a stack of research material, old hotels and different periods that were very fun to look at in a room in the hotel that we’d all taken over. Plus a stack of DVDs. He said, "Not only read Stefan Zweig’s novels but I’ve also been inspired by and what we’re looking for in tone is maybe something related to these movies here. And you’ve all got DVDs in your room and players and see if you want to watch them." I had never seen Grand Hotel. I’d never seen To Be Or Not To Be. I’d never seen The Mortal Storm. That one is with Jimmy Stewart and there’re elements of fascism and somebody standing up to it -– right up the alley of my character.

You’ve been involved in a couple of the bigger science fiction franchises of the last 20 years and they seem to be coming around again. And you seem to be involved in at least one of them.

Yeah, I have to support what’s happened so far to me which is that it seems that Jurassic World will be something I’d buy a ticket to. I was happy to work with Mr. Spielberg on those couple of movies. And I think I’m fully satisfied. But I love anything that he’s associated with. I’d love to see that and I’ve always liked dinosaurs. And Independence Day. yes, I’ve had some conversations with and a nice dinner meeting with Mr. Dean Devlin and Roland Emmerich because they’ve got something cooking. I don’t know what will come of it but they’re hopeful and I’m hopeful too. I haven’t read anything but they sort of described some things to me that I can’t talk about. But, you know, who knows what’ll happen. But I had a great time working on that, you know. I know people enjoyed it here and there.

Yes, a few people.

Yeah, yeah.

What does it say to you about Hollywood that this industry can support an artist like Wes who is so original and so creative, And yet at the same time does want to go back to the well for these franchises over and over again?

You know more about that than I do. It’s an interesting thing. I don’t stay focused on that so I don’t know. I only know my part of the elephant. It’s interesting. I like to read Easy Riders, Raging Bulls...I’m not sure where we’re at to the big picture right now. And I don’t know how Hollywood functions and why they do what they do but I’m lucky that I travel the path that seems to be, you know, taking a little here and there or contributing what I can here and there. So I’m happy as a clam.


What do you think has enabled you to keep you doing it for that long a period and weaving in and out of these different roles and phases of the business?

Well, luck. I can only think luck because I’m very grateful. I was obsessed with and was wild about getting a chance to do it back in Pittsburgh and I got a chance to do it and I’ve kept getting chances to do it so I’m very grateful. I don’t wake up where I’m not feeling highly appreciative. So maybe that has something to do with continuing, you know, the productivity. And an appetite for collaboration maybe and then the spirit of passion that I had from the beginning and appetite for it. Maybe that just may be unrelated and it's only luck. But maybe that has something to do with, you know, because I stay every day focused on what I love doing about it and get clearer and more enjoyment out of acting every day. I’m kind of a late bloomer. (Acting teacher) Sandy Meisner said, you know, you can profitably approach the thing as a student forever. So that’s kind of what I do and I’m very interested in it. And so I love it. And I stay every day as focused on what I love about it and getting nourished by it and feeding and developing my love of it whether it’s one aspect of it or another. Maybe that’s not unrelated to the fact that I keep getting a chance or two to do one thing or another or maybe it’s just luck.

Have you seen David Cronenberg’s staging of the opera version of The Fly?

I have not. I’d love to. I should really. He’s great, David Cronenberg. I’d love to work with him again. I just loved having done what I did with him. He’s great.

The first film I ever saw you in was Invasion of the Body Snatchers, and I recently had an opportunity to talk to Donald Sutherland a little bit about and was just wondering what memories you had of making that film.

The great Michael Chapman was the cinematographer who had done Raging Bull and many other things. (Director) Philip Kaufman is a wonderful guy to be around. It was a very special experience to work with him and he’s great, you know. I had a great time. San Francisco, 1978, doing that movie, he had something specific in mind. There was improvisation a little bit here and there. That was nice. Philip Kaufman sort of trusted me and appreciated me in some way that made me feel I sort of was special. I had a great time. Donald Sutherland was great. When I was 13 or something in the mid-1960s I’d seen Joanna. Do you know that movie? British movie. My parents used to take us to see art movies and during that period there were interesting art movies to be found and we saw them. Joanna was one of them. I think it was his first movie. And so I had an affection for him and an interest in him before and it was thrilling to be in (the movie with him). I’m thrilled that I was part of that and I have very fond memories of that.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Nymphomaniac Volume 1 review

$
0
0
ReviewDon Kaye3/10/2014 at 10:08AM

Is Lars von Trier’s Nymphomaniac the ultimate in explicit arthouse porn, built to outrage and titillate? Well…

If you’re going to watch Danish filmmaker/provocateur Lars von Trier’s Nymphomaniac Volume 1, thinking that he’s going to go overboard with sexually explicit material and make a shagfest disguised as an art film, you will be dreadfully disappointed. The last word I’d use to describe Nymphomaniac is “erotic,” but the right words to actually explain it are harder to come by. As always, von Trier works in this film -- the first half of a four-hour-plus epic -- according to his own peculiar vision. But while the film succeeds in some ways it falls short in others – at least until we see whether that is rectified in Volume 2 (the first half is out on VOD now and in theaters March 21, with Volume 2 on VOD March 20 and in theaters April 4).

Nymphomaniac is the story of Joe (Charlotte Gainsbourg), a woman who is found beaten in an alley by the kindly bachelor Seligman (Stellan Skarsgard). Joe goes with Seligman back to his apartment, where he treats her wounds and lets her recover from the attack. As she does, Joe begins to tell Seligman her life story – that from a young age, she has been consumed by lust and has burned through a long line of male sexual partners, leaving the occasional ruined life in her wake. Seligman listens intently, at first reserved than wildly connecting aspects of Joe’s story to trivia and factoids from literature, art, numbers theory and, uh, fly fishing.

Gainsbourg and Skarsgard are both adept at delivering their odd, picaresque dialogue, but much of Nymphomaniac, Volume 1 is devoted to Stacy Martin as Joe in flashbacks. She asks a young man named Jerome (Shia LaBeouf) to take her virginity, which he does on a break from fixing his motorcycle. That's the jumping-off point for her journey of sexual discovery, but what we discover early on is that sex is a purely physical act for Joe, and that she will stop at nothing for it. What we don’t know is why she is like this – while her mother (Connie Nielsen) was cold and distant, she enjoyed a warm and loving relationship with her father (a surprising Christian Slater) that – so far – does not seem to be hiding the kind of history of sexual abuse at his hands that would be the typical Hollywood motivating factor for Joe’s actions.


She seems to be operating as the same kind of primal force of feminine power that von Trier has introduced into his last two films, Antichrist and Melancholia, while the men in the film – Skarsgard’s Seligman aside, who seems only intellectually aroused – are just animals, helpless to resist her no matter how virtuous they initially seem (and forget the ones who don’t even bother with that). Yet – with the exception of Jerome, who returns to her life later on – it’s all just grist for the mill that is Joe’s enormous sexual appetite.

The question is: to what end? Nymphomaniac Volume 1 is ultimately just a series of vignettes, punctuated by the weirdly comic philosophical discussions between Seligman and the older Joe, which chart the incidents in Joe’s life in dispassionate fashion. It doesn’t help that Martin’s Joe, perhaps intentionally resembling the scores of anonymous young actresses you might see in chintzy ‘70s European porn, is a distant and unfathomable figure, earning neither our compassion nor our antipathy. She may have unchecked sexual cravings but remains a blank otherwise until a sequence near the film’s end with her now hospitalized father.

It is this scene and one just previous to it – in which Joe is confronted by the wife of one of her lovers, three young sons in tow, that finally pack an emotional punch. The wife is played by Uma Thurman in a blistering, show-stealing performance that escalates from polite, calm distaste to unrestrained grief and fury in a moment that feels as real as it does uncomfortable. There is nothing quite as nakedly emotional or visceral in the rest of Nymphomaniac, Volume 1, although that last scene with Joe’s father comes close.


But hey, there’s a montage of photos of penises of all sizes and colors halfway through to jolt you awake just in case you were starting to snooze. And you may be tempted to; while von Trier is always up to more than what it seems with his films, he doesn’t seem as sure about his mission on Nymphomaniac, Volume 1. As I said earlier, it’s far from arousing – the sex is mostly soulless, even ugly – and its little moments of black comedy sit uneasily within its dogged and somewhat dreary narrative. Will the larger theme or context be revealed in Nymphomaniac, Volume 2? We’ll jump back into bed with Joe and her many partners in two weeks and find out.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

5

New Poster of Angelina Jolie In Maleficent

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow3/10/2014 at 12:59PM

Check out the latest poster of Angelina Jolie as the wickedly entrancing Maleficent from the upcoming summer Disney movie.

Besides beautiful animation and songs cherished by what appears to be eons of nostalgia, the one thing "Disney movies" (or rather films specifically from The Walt Disney Company) seem to be remembered for is their villains. The viscious nasty types that make the heroes' lives hell. Think Scar, Jafar, and a pair of fiendishly wicked Siamese Cats.

Still, one villain who towers above all the rest, even when she is not in dragon form, has always been Sleeping Beauty's demonic sorceress Maleficent. Thus, with the current trend of remaking fairy tale classics in live-action for a modern audience, it is unsurprising that Disney taking on the monstrosity is a given. And Angelina Jolie embodying the role seems even more perfect. And now below, you can see the new full poster for the villainess turned titular anti-heroine.


Maleficent opens May 30, 2014.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Gareth Edwards’ Godzilla Gets A Mondo Poster

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow3/10/2014 at 2:12PM
new godzilla movie

Mondo and Alamo Drafthouse reveal new impressive poster art for Gareth Edwards' upcoming Godzilla reboot.

Up from the depths and 40 stories high, Godzilla is one big guy; this is a fact that Warner Brothers, Legendary Pictures, and now Alamo Drafthouse want to consistently remind you of. From Mondo, Alamo Drafthouse’s well-known art department, and designed by Phantom City Creative, the below poster (released via Yahoo) showcases the King of Monsters in stunning artistic detail while he takes in the sights of some of the West Coast’s once beautiful cities. He certainly knows how to leave his mark.


Godzilla mondo

Directed by Gareth Edwards, the new Godzilla stars Bryan Cranston, Aaron Taylor-Johnson Elizabeth Olsen, David Strathaim, Ken Watanabe, Juliette Binoche, and Sally Hawkins. It opens May 16, 2014 in 2D, 3D, and IMAX.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Jason Sudeikis to take lead in Fletch remake

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew3/11/2014 at 7:49AM
Jason Sudeikis

The new take on Fletch is finally going ahead, and Jason Sudeikis is set to star in it...

A project that's been on Hollywood's remake radar for a long time now - Kevin Smith was developing it at one stage - has been Fletch. The original proved to be a solid hit, with Chevy Chase in the title role. That was in turn based on the novels by Gregory McDonald.

Mind you, Chase's take on Fletch wasn't too heavily informed by the original novels, but the new Fletch is going to be. It's being developed by producers Steve Golin, Michael Sugar and David List, and they're on the lookout for a director for the film.

It looks like they have their star, though. Jason Sudeikis, off the back of his 2013 hit We're The Millers, has landed the role of Fletch. The project is currently going under the title of Fletch Won, has been set up at Warner Bros, and is being described as a "gritty action comedy".

Grit is the in-thing in Hollywood, it seems.

More news on Fletch Won as we get it. If it hits big, plans are afoot for a comedy franchise here...

The Hollywood Reporter.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Veronica Mars review

$
0
0
ReviewCaroline Preece3/11/2014 at 7:52AM

Rob Thomas and Kristen Bell bring Veronica Mars to the big screen, courtesy of nearly $6m in Kickstarter funding. But is the film any good?

The story behind the Veronica Mars movie is extraordinary. It should never have existed and might never be emulated again but, if the film is a success both with audiences and financially, then that story could become an amazing fairytale of fan loyalty and creative triumph. If it were to disappoint those who bankrolled the comeback via Kickstarter, however, all of that could be instantly forgotten. But that pressure aside, rarely has there been such a lovingly crafted adventure in fan service as this, with cast and crew banding together to create something purely for those loyal devotees – defying the CW’s cancellation and making international news out of a television series that barely anyone watched in the first place.

But that’s history now and, after a groundbreaking and unprecedented campaign to resurrect our favourite (once) teenage sleuth for a big screen comeback, Veronica Mars is very much in the cultural discussion. All eyes are on this movie – fans for the delayed resolution to a frustratingly unfinished story and others for its potential to alter the movie making model for the future. And here's the good news: the Veronica Mars movie comes off as a wonderful (potential) send-off for the character, a love letter to the fans and a success story for a show that could have died a long time ago. This is what we’ve longed for, with everything that worked on the small screen transferred beautifully to a slickly realised 109-minute labour of love.

After taking a brief trip down memory lane (thanks to a heavy dose of early exposition), we learn that Veronica (Kristen Bell) is living in New York and interviewing for snazzy lawyer jobs while dating old college boyfriend Piz (Chris Lowell) and steering clear of any drama. With Veronica being the addict she is, however, it’s not long before temptation arises in the form of old flame Logan Echolls (Jason Dohring), who has been accused of murdering fellow 90er girlfriend Carrie Bishop (here disappointingly not played by original actress Leighton Meester, but replaced by Andrea Estella). That the case happens to coincide with the timing of a ten year high school reunion is a not-so-happy accident, and the hunt for answers leads Veronica to reconnect with some familiar faces, old friends and bitter enemies she’d rather have left in the past.

With big delays or when a story switches mediums, there’s always the fear that what we loved about the original could be lost in translation, but that definitely isn’t the case here. Veronica is back in every single way – mind, body, heart and spirit – and, for those who kept the hope alive for so many years, handing over their cash as soon as the opportunity arose, that’s the greatest gift imaginable. Not only do we get Veronica and Keith (Enrico Colantoni) back investigating the escapades of Neptune’s ever-more corrupt elite, but there's also a return for every member of the main cast along with supporting characters who played a role in establishing Neptune High as a living, breathing, Hellmouth-esque nucleus during the first two years of the show.

The criticisms that will meet the film will be regarding its distinct lack of cinematic aspirations. This is not a blockbuster movie designed to appeal to a mass, uninitiated audience, but a feature-length finale to a show that has no qualms about littering the script with in-jokes and references, and nothing more than a stylised ‘previously on Veronica Mars’ segment inserted at the movie’s start. New viewers will likely find themselves lost and adrift after the first ten minutes but, that said, it also serves as a lovely introduction to everything this world has to offer. Repeated or adapted themes from episodes past form the basis of the film’s mystery and various character journeys, for example, resulting in a gratifying microcosm of Veronica’s world.

The things existing fans will love about the film are just too numerous to list here. There are endless cameos that somehow never feel tiresome or unnecessary, the razor-sharp wit and humour that characterised the show is intact, and there's a sense that the place in which we find everyone is completely in keeping with the way we left them back in 2007. Keith and Logan are the most important and thus prominent returning players but, if your favourite character happens to be someone else, rest assured that absolutely everyone gets their turn in the spotlight. It’s kind of obvious when you think how long we’ve been waiting but every development, whether it’s for specific characters or their relationships, feels totally earned and completely deserved.

The film’s smallness makes it hard to imagine it as the huge financial success we’ve secretly been hoping for, and there are plenty of flaws that could be picked at, but that’s hardly the point. This is a movie that defied all the odds and owed fans a lot for their support and loyalty, and it has more than delivered on its humble promise to finish the story we all fell in love with nine years ago. This is the finale we deserved back when Veronica Mars was still on the air, but it’s also a great demonstration of what made the show special in the first place. Even if it doesn’t capture the attention of the average moviegoer, at least it will prompt newbies to go back and experience the show, and that’s just a bonus.

Always rewarding but never self-indulgent, the movie version of Veronica Mars is as much a continuation as it is a loving swan song to the original show, and enthusiasts and curious film fans alike can stop worrying. Whether this project changes anything or not, impossible movies are a cause for celebration just for their mere existence. It’s all true fellow Marshmallows – Veronica Mars is back, and she's in the form of her life.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


The rise and fall of Carolco

$
0
0
FeatureRyan Lambie3/11/2014 at 8:05AM

In the late 80s, Carolco was one of the biggest studios in Hollywood, but by 1995, it was gone. Ryan charts its dramatic rise and fall...

Paul Verhoeven is not a happy man. It's 1994, and the Dutch director of (among other things) RoboCop and Total Recall is in a pivotal meeting with executives at Carolco Pictures. They're in the boardroom to discuss Crusade: a lavish, $100m historical drama described as Spartacus meets Conan.

With a script by Walon Green (The Wild Bunch, WarGames), and a cast headed up by Arnold Schwarzenegger, it sounds like the kind of star-filled, opulent film Carolco Pictures is famous for making. The supporting cast includes Jennifer Connelly and Robert Duvall. The script is vibrant and brash. There are massive sets being built in rural Spain. But privately, Carolco's bosses are anxious; they have another hugely expensive project in the works - the pirate action picture Cutthroat Island - and with debts mounting, they can ill-afford to finance one film, and certainly not both at the same time.

When Carolco's executives tell Verhoeven they want guarantees that Crusade won't drift over its agreed budget, the director is outraged. His previous films with the studio, Total Recall and Basic Instinct, had made them millions. With he and Schwarzenegger at the helm, Crusade would surely follow suit. And they wanted guarantees?

Arnold Schwarzenegger was sitting next to Verhoeven at the time, and as he later told Empiremagazine, could only observe as the director vented his fury.

"There's no such thing as guarantees!" Verhoeven raged. "Guarantees don't happen and if anyone promises you guarantees, they're lying! We don't even know that if you walk out of the building here you won't get hit by a truck. There's no guarantee that we're going to make it 'til tomorrow! I cannot have control over God – I don't even believe in God, why am I talking about God? But someone, nature, could just rain for three months and then what do we do? How can I give you a guarantee? This is ludicrous!"

And with that, Crusade was dead. Desperate to save itself by turning out what it hoped was a sure-fire hit, Carolco ditched the blood-and-thunder Verhoeven picture and put its money on the more upbeat, crowd-pleasing Cutthroat Island instead. Except, as history now recalls, Cutthroat Island didn't please crowds, and instead became one of the most infamous financial misfires in Hollywood history.

Cutthroat Island represented the final roll of the dice for Carolco, a company that was once one of the biggest independent production companies of the 1980s and early 90s. In its heyday, the names of its founders, Mario Kassar and Andrew Vajna, were a familiar sight on posters, and the pair's extravagant deals resulted in some of the era's most expensive and successful movies.

Yet even at the peak of its powers in 1991, the cracks in Carolco's edifice were already beginning to show, and by 1996, the company was bankrupt. To find out what went wrong, we have to head back to the company's beginnings in the 1970s.

Kassar and Vajna: the early years

Before Carolco, Mario F Kassar and Andrew G Vajna were two young outsiders with big ideas. Mario Kassar was born in Beirut in 1951, and caught the filmmaking bug from his father, an independent movie producer. By 18, Kassar had already established himself as a miniature mogul, having purchased several Italian and French films for distribution in the Far East.

Andrew Vajna, meanwhile, took a rather more circuitous route into the film industry. Born in Budapest in 1944, Vajna moved with his parents to America when he was 12. He was greatly interested in music and later studied photography, but by the time Vajna was in his early 20s, he was living in Hong Kong and the proprietor of a large and profitable wig-making factory.

It was in Hong Kong that Vajna began to move into the film business, first by purchasing a pair of cinemas, and then by producing a kung-fu movie - Deadly China Doll (1973), starring martial arts star Carter Wong. Made for a snip at $100,000, the movie was a hit, and earned $2.5m worldwide.

Vajna and Kassar met at the Cannes Film Festival in 1975, and bonded over their mutual ability to successfully market films in foreign markets. With a long term aim to finance their own movies, the pair formed Carolco in 1976 - a name they'd taken from a long-dead company based in Panama.

"We just bought the name," Kassar later told Entertainment Weekly. "It means nothing."

Cracking Hollywood

The pair's first venture together was The Sicilian Cross (1976), a best-forgotten Roger Moore thriller shot in Italy. Despite its suspect quality, Vajna and Kassar managed to buy the rights for $130,000 and sell it on for a profit. By the early 1980s, Vajna and Kassar had bought an office in Hollywood, and had served as executive producers on The Changeling (1979), The Amateur, and Escape To Victory (both 1981).

The first two movies were well-received but financially less successful. World War II football drama Escape To Victory, however, was a minor hit, and marked the first time the producers would cross paths with Sylvester Stallone - a star who would play a key role in Carolco's future growth.

Hunting around for a project they could produce together, Kassar and Vajna settled on First Blood, a novel written by David Morrell in 1972 about a returning Vietnam war veteran's mistreatment and subsequent psychological meltdown in small town America. Warner Bros had been trying to get a film adaptation of the book off the ground for years, and having cycled through several major stars and dozens of scripts, they decided to wash their hands of it.

Kassar and Vajna gamely paid Warner $385,000 for the rights to First Blood in 1980, and settled on Stallone as their star. After a fair amount of back-and-forth negotiation over Sly's fee, a hefty seven-figure salary was agreed on. Carolco didn't yet have the finances to even make the movie, much less pay Stallone, but the producers knew that Stallone's star status could be used to secure the requisite investment.

Having acquired the funds to make the film from a European bank, First Blood went into production, where its filming overran and its budget quickly crept over the $11m originally earmarked. Then Kirk Douglas quit the role of Colonel Trautman in the middle of filming - he disliked the alteration of the book's ending - and Richard Crenna had to be rushed in as a replacement.

Yet despite the bumpy production, First Blood was a major hit in October 1982, and eventually made $125m on its $14m investment. Carolco was now a major Hollywood production company.

The 80s boom years

Kirk Douglas may have strongly disliked Sylvester Stallone's altered ending for First Blood, but Carolco would soon reap the rewards from the actor’s decision. The source novel saw Rambo die at the hands of his superior, Colonel Trautman, but Stallone was determined to make Rambo more sympathetic and less violent in the movie. Above all, Stallone wanted Rambo to survive to fight another day.

That decision led to Rambo: First Blood Part II, a $25m action film that would focus on the more upbeat aspects of the first picture - action, helicopters, Sly's rippling muscles - and less on fascist cops and damaged psyches. This time, Rambo would go back to Vietnam and win the war all by himself.

A young James Cameron wrote the script, and Italian filmmaker George P Cosmatos was the headlining director. (Legend has it, however, that Stallone was secretly at the helm, and dominated the film's direction even more than he reportedly did on the set of First Blood.)

The release of First Blood Part II was (cynically, you could argue) timed to coincide with the anniversary of America's withdrawal from Vietnam ten years earlier, and critics largely hated it. Yet the sequel captured a feel-good, patriotic mood among the American public, and it was a huge success, making $150m in the US alone. First Blood Part II also demonstrated Kassar and Vajna's understanding of the global market, since the film made the same figure again overseas, pulling in a grand total of just over $300m in worldwide receipts.

Carolco continued to expand in the wake of First Blood Part II's success, and would soon become known for its high-profile movies led by major Hollywood stars. Those stars came with a price tag, however, and the company quickly became infamous in trade magazines for its huge payouts to actors like Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger. As British producer David Puttnam noted in Stephen Prince's book, A New Pot Of Gold,"Carolco in particular became an instant 'major' by offering the stars more money than the established studios offered."

After First Blood Part II, Carolco produced such movies as Angel Heart and Extreme Prejudice, which weren't huge hits, but were well received and made by respected filmmakers - Alan Parker in the case of Angel Heart, and Walter Hill in the case of Extreme Prejudice. But what Carolco really wanted was another Rambo - and they were willing to pay just about anything to see it made.

To this end, Stallone was handed $16m to reprise his starring role - a startling amount of money for the time - and the resulting sequel wound up costing around $62m. The excess spilled into a film itself, which arrived in a dervish of explosions, gunfire and even more helicopters than First Blood Part II.

Although Rambo III fell short of the domestic grosses enjoyed by the previous movie, its success abroad pretty much guaranteed a profit - and then there were all the videogames, toys and other bits of lucrative merchandising to consider.

Bolstered by the financial cunning of tax attorney Peter Hoffman, who'd become president in 1986, the late 80s saw Carolco climb to the heights of its success. The company's deep pockets funded the likes of Red Heat, a buddy-cop movie that earned Arnold Schwarzenegger an $8m pay packet. Films of the late 80s and early 90s like Lock Up (starring Stallone), Jacob's Ladder, King Of New York and Mountains Of The Moon were more low-key, but all Carolco needed, the thinking went, was one major hit each year to bankroll those lesser performers.

The peak years

Stories of Carolco's extravagant spending became common during the late 1980s. According to Entertainment Weekly, there were parties, private jets, generous dividends, the names of new movies deals lit up in fireworks, and stretch limos prowling around Bel Air with the company's name proudly emblazoned on the number plates. Back at Carolco HQ, big names including James Cameron, Paul Verhoeven and Oliver Stone were all working away on movie projects.

For Andrew Vajna, however, Carolco's growth was all too much. "After Rambo, we were trying to become a major studio. I felt that was the wrong direction," Vajna told Entertainment Weekly."My feelings were very negative and it caused a lot of friction between Mario, myself, and Peter, who was by then Mario's right hand. I disagreed with where they wanted to go, and Peter played our egos against each other. He wanted to be a partner."

Kassar and Vajna's partnership had fallen apart by 1989, and Vajna was paid approximately $100m for his share in the company. Kassar and Hoffman carried on regardless, and the massive international success of Total Recall in 1990 (box office: $262m) seemed to indicate that Vajna was wrong and that Carolco was on the right track.

Yet as the 90s dawned, it seemed as though Carolco's expenditure was beginning to spiral out of control. Millions were being spent on scripts and multi-picture deals with actors. When Schwarzenegger signed up to make Terminator 2 (Carolco having bought the Terminator rights from Hemdale for $5m in 1990), he was given a $17m jet as a gift - on top of the $14m salary he'd already been awarded for reprising his role as the T-800.

Behind the scenes, the company was beginning to struggle, hastened in part by a recession that made borrowing huge sums of cash less easy than it was in the 1980s. Its TV and home video label was also faltering, causing Carolco's stock value to fluctuate wildly throughout the start of the 90s. One banker damningly summed up Carolco's situation as "A disaster waiting to happen."

Carolco's problems were such that, even when Terminator 2: Judgment Day made a phenomenal $520m at the box office in 1991, Carolco still posted a loss of $91m in the first nine months of that year. The films following Terminator 2's release did little to brighten the studio's fortunes - Rambling Rose, Defenseless and The Dark Wind all failed to make much of a financial impact.

The erotic thriller Basic Instinct, directed by Paul Verhoeven, was a big success the following year, having made $352m. (Interestingly, Andrew Vajna had originally planned to produce the film under his new Cinergi Pictures banner, but Kassar, perhaps keen to get back at his old partner, purchased Joe Esterhas' Basic Instinct script for $3m after a furious bout of bidding.)

After Basic Instinct, Carolco's other 1992 releases all struggled. Aces: Iron Eagle III was a flop in cinemas, Universal Soldiers was only a modest hit, while even the critically-acclaimed Chaplin failed to make more than a third of its $30m budget at the box office.

When Carolco made plans to produce Cliffhanger in 1992, it was forced to make a drastically unfavourable deal to get the $60m it needed. This involved giving up the US distribution rights, both in cinemas and on video, in exchange for half of the project's budget. As a result, relatively little of the Stallone action vehicle’s $255m profits went to Carolco.

The films that came after Cliffhanger faced mixed fortunes. Sci-fi epic Stargate (1994) was a hit, yet John Candy's last film, Wagons East! was a widely-forgotten miss. As the mid-90s approached, Carolco was forced to sell off the rights to some of its own projects, not least Showgirls, a Paul Verhoeven-Joe Esterhas reunion that would later become a critical and financial misfire.

Cutthroat Island

All of this led back to that fateful meeting with Verhoeven in 1994, where Carolco felt compelled to drop the Dutch director's lavish Crusade in favour of Cutthroat Island. Yet ironically, the studio that had once prided itself on making huge deals with Hollywood's biggest stars found itself unable to secure a major actor.

Michael Douglas was initially interested, yet left the project when director Renny Harlin refused to increase the size of Douglas' role - instead, Harlin was fixed on making his wife Geena Davis the movie's lead. Other stars, including Keanu Reeves, Ralph Fiennes and Liam Neeson, were all approached, and all passed. Perhaps in its late 80s pomp, Carolco could have afforded to make one of those big names an offer they couldn't refuse. In 1994, they had to settle for the less bankable Matthew Modine.

The production was not a happy one, with illnesses on set, a full-size replica pirate ship accidentally set on fire and huge cost overruns - which at this point, Carolco was less than able to afford. Faced with certain doom if they didn't press ahead with the film regardless of cost, the studio battled on.

"We knew from that point if we lost Cutthroat Island as well bankruptcy would be inevitable," a former executive told the Independent in 1996. "If we made the film, there was at least some chance we could survive."

By the time Cutthroat Island came out in US cinemas in December 1992, Carolco had already filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, and if there were hopes that the pirate movie could save the studio, they would soon be dashed - the $98m Cutthroat Island sailed quietly in and out of theatres with little more than $10m to its name that winter. Carolco's assets were duly flogged to the highest bidder, and today, the rights to its catalogue of films are owned by StudioCanal.

In the wake of Carolco's collapse, Mario Kassar moved to Paramount, before forming a new studio - C2 Pictures - with his old partner Andrew Vajna in 2002. Their new partnership brought mixed fortunes, however; Terminator 3: Rise Of The Machines provided an echo of Carolco's glory days, and made $433m in 2003. The lambasted Basic Instinct 2 (2006) failed to follow suit.

The legacy

For some, Carolco's turbulent history will always be associated with lavish blockbusters, outrageous deals and the spiralling costs of filmmaking in the 80s and 90s, and its demise was often regarded as hubris by rivals who blamed the studio for grossly inflating the earning potential of Hollywood’s biggest stars. But while Carolco’s most famous hits were loud and over-the-top, it was also responsible for producing some of the era's most interesting American films, too. First Blood Part II, Red Heat and Total Recall may have been among the defining action movies of the period, but they were joined by quieter, superbly-made films such as Angel Heart, Jacob's Ladder and L.A. Story. 

Like another major independent production company of the time, Cannon Films, Carolco understood the importance of the overseas market - something the rest of Hollywood wouldn’t latch onto for several years. It's also possible that, had its business decisions been a little different, Carolco could have survived its mid-90s struggles, and perhaps even flourished.

"Think about it,"Stargate producer Dean Devlin said to Entertainment Weekly."Had they been able to keep Carolco going a little bit longer, the next two movies would have been Independence Day and Titanic. [Nearly] 3 billion dollars in worldwide box office."

With the benefit of hindsight, we can only wonder what would have happened had Carolco decided to make Crusade instead. Would Crusade have succeeded where Cutthroat Island failed, and saved the studio from oblivion? Or would its greater cost and violent, earthy subject matter have led Carolco down the exact same road to bankruptcy?

Ultimately, the story of Carolco is one of high-stakes gambles. The canny deals and big-budget film took the studio from obscurity to the top of the Hollywood power list in just a few years, before it fell, Icarus-like, in the 1990s. But for all the failings that would ultimately become its undoing in its final years, Carolco remained an independent studio from beginning to end.

"We always work outside the studio system, and the studio for us just means a method of distribution for the product," Andrew Vajna told the BBC a few years after Carolco's collapse. "We like to creatively do the projects ourselves, and not do it by committee. Independence is the only way we work."

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

New Godzilla DVD and Blu-ray Reissues Rising from Tokyo Bay

$
0
0
FeatureJim Knipfel3/11/2014 at 9:04AM

To clear a path of destruction for Gareth Edwards Godzilla reboot, several classic Toho titles are being released for the very first time.

With that unstoppable Hypeosaurus poised to go on a rampage any minute now in preparation for the May 16th release of Gareth Edwards reboot of Godzilla, a couple of small video distribution companies are trying to get in on the action by reissuing a handful of, well, if not exactly “classic” titles from Godzilla’s 60 year run, at least some interesting ones. For the obsessives out there, the exciting news is a couple have never come out on DVD or Blu-ray before (not legally anyway).

First up, on April 1st Universal will be releasing both 1962’s King Kong vs. Godzilla and 1967’s King Kong Escapes on Blu-ray for the first time, as well as reissues of both DVDs. Okay, so Universal isn’t exactly a “small distribution company,” King Kong vs. Godzilla is indeed a series classic, and Godzilla isn’t even in King Kong Escapes, but we’ll just shut the hell up about all that, won’t we? Only the US versions of both films will be included on the discs, which are okay here, as both were rare instances in which the differences between the US version and Toho originals were negligible.

In Godzilla terms, King Kong vs. Godzilla was groundbreaking in many ways. It was considered the first real sequel to 1954’s Gojira (what was known here as Godzilla Raids Again had been originally released as Gigantis the Fire Monster), it was the first Godzilla film in color, and it represented the last screen credit for poor, sad Willis O’Brien, who’d animated Kong in the ‘33 original and spent the last half of his career pitching Kong scripts around Hollywood in vain. Somehow his script for King Kong vs. Frankenstein ended up on Toho producer Tomoyuki Tanaka’s desk, and he decided to make it his next Godzilla picture. Not surprisingly the story bears an uncanny resemblance to the original Kong, but with Godzilla, and in Japan, and with a happier ending.

King Kong Escapes, a favorite of mine when I was a kid, is a weirdie. A weirdie aimed squarely at a much younger audience. Toho made the picture with Rankin/Bass in a rare Japanese-American co-production to tie into a then-popular Saturday morning Kong cartoon. Watching it as an adult this is pretty obvious. There’s an evil queen, a mad scientist, a giant Kong robot, an abrasive submarine nurse, and more Americans than you’d expect in a Toho picture. Kong here might resemble Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer’s Bumble, but I still think Mechakong is pretty fucking cool.

 Much more exciting, on May 6, a week and a half before Edwards’ film premieres, a new little video distributor called Kraken Releasing (a division of Section 23 Films) will release 1972’s Godzilla vs. Gigan (aka Godzilla on Monster Island), 1966’s Ebirah, Horror of the Deep (aka Godzilla vs. The Sea Monster), and 1971’s Godzilla vs. Hedorah (aka Godzilla vs. The Smog Monster) on DVD and Blu-Ray. All three titles will include both the US and Japanese versions, and even though they aren’t what you’d exactly call great films (though I have a soft spot for Hedorah), if you’re a compulsive like me, getting both versions on disc makes this a big deal.


All right, so maybe Gigan’s not a big deal (though the Japanese version is surprisingly bloody for a Godzilla film). It’s very comic book centric, and in one head scratcher of a scene Godzilla and Anguirus speak in word balloons. Overall though at this point the series was fast plunging toward its nadir, which it would hit with the following year’s Godzilla vs. Megalon.

What makes the release of Ebirahinteresting, apart from the scene in which Godzilla plays volleyball with the titular giant fiddler crab and a boulder, and another scene in which Godzilla meditates (yes, meditates) is that the film, though released in a cheap VHS version a long time back, has never come out on disc before.

The same is true for Godzilla vs. The Smog Monster, which makes this the most intriguing of the lot. Although the Japanese version has been available for years, it’s well known that for some reason (likely the theme song, “Save the Earth”) Toho has been trying to bury the American version since it was first released. Why they hate the US version so much I can’t say, but they won’t even acknowledge it ever existed. It briefly came out on VHS in the late ‘80s, then quickly vanished. Fifteen years ago I paid a damn arm and a leg for a used copy, and prices have been jacked way up to Jesus ever since. If Kraken really does have the US theatrical version of Smog Monster on the disc (and I don’t know how they’d get that one past Toho) then they have a goldmine on their hands, even though Hedorah is a much better film, there are just too many Godzilla fans who were imprinted by the Smog Monster at a very early age and who still find themselves humming “Save the Earth” in the grocery store.

I think what has me most giddy about the new releases is knowing that come early May I’ll finally be able to trade out those old tapes and free up a little space on my Godzilla shelves. Now if someone would only release Godzilla 1985 and Son of Godzilla on disc, I’d be all set and could finally relax.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

 

Knights of Badassdom DVD And Blu-Ray Release Date Announced

$
0
0
TrailerTony Sokol3/11/2014 at 10:02AM

Knights of Badassdom gets a dvd and blu-ray release date, and the new trailer gets medieval when LARP gets out of hand.

Knights of Badassdom has knights, wizards, maidens and a demon and they’re all coming out on DVD and Blu-Ray on April 1.

Some movies bill themselves as having all-star casts, but the new trailer for the Knights of Badassom is cast with all-star geeks. Summer Glau from Serenity, Steve Zahn from so many geeky classics, but I’m just going to say the dad on the Diary of a Wimpy Kid  movie series just to be arbitrarily contrary, Ryan Kwanten who is Jason Stackhouse from True Blood. Peter Dinlage from Game of Thrones, and he’s packing an ounce of killer shrooms. There are monsters to be slain and these are just the dweebs to get medieval.

The Knights of Badassdom are role-players who actually kinda look bad ass. They live in a world within a world that’s like no other world, a weekend getaway in the trailer park known as The Fields of Evermore. The assembled are Dungeon and Dragoning out when they inadvertently summon a succubus from hell. While a lot of roleplay gamers might figure this is the hottest date they might ever get, these LARPers do battle to save the realm. Huzzah and shit.


Knights of badassdom

The official synopsis says “Knights of Badassdom follows three best friends (Dinklage, Zahn and Kwanten) and dedicated LARPers (Live Action Role Players) as they take to the woods to reenact a dungeons and dragons-like scenario fresh out of the Middle Ages. Trouble arises after they unwittingly conjure up some serious evil in the form of a blood-lusting Succubus from the pits of hell.  And as fantasy and reality collide on the Fields of Evermore in an all-out epic battle of make-believe wizards, demons and assorted mythical creatures, their courage and friendship is put to the test as they attempt to vanquish the evil they have summoned.  Will the group prove to simply be foam sword-wielding LARPers or true "Knights of Badassdom?"  Art thou ready to find out?”

Directed by Joe Lynch, Knights of Badassdom also features Danny Pudi from Community, Maragrita Levieva from Revenge and Adventureland and Jimmi Simpson from House of Cards and Date Night.


knights of badassdom

The DVD has special features including interviews, out-takes and a Summer Glau: Hottie Montage.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

New Clip From Captain America: The Winter Soldier

$
0
0
TrailerDavid Crow3/11/2014 at 1:40PM

In the latest clip from Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Steve Rogers locks vibranium for the first time with the Winter Soldier!

In heroes we trust, as well as Marvel Studios and Disney, because they are confident enough in Captain America: The Winter Soldier to release another joyful superhero clip from next month’s event film. In the below chase sequence, savor the shield, and SHIELD, on winter soldier action that details what happens when the titular mysterious “terrorist” comes into contact with Steve Rogers and his indestructible vibranium.

Captain America: The Winter Soldier stars Chris Evans, Anthony Mackie, Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Robert Redford, and Samuel L. Jackson, and its own winter comes April 4, 2014 in the U.S.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Emma Watson Introduces New Noah Trailer

$
0
0
TrailerDavid Crow3/11/2014 at 2:04PM

Emma Watson introduces the new trailer for Noah, which casts a light on her blessed family, and all the damnable others they must overcome.

The biblical epic is at hand, and we should all quake in awe of its majestic power! And yet there is another…a power so great in the 21st century that Paramount would seek to place it above all else in the marketing…and that is Emma Watson!

In a special treat for Emma Watson’s Facebook and Twitter followers, she charmingly debuted the latest trailer for this month’s reimagining of the Noah tale with Russell Crowe as the savior of man and two-by-two stepping animals.

From Darren Aronofsky, director of Black Swan and Requiem for a Dream, Noah is the passion project he left The Wolverine for. Set in Biblical times, Noah (Crowe) is commissioned by God to build an ark that will save his family and two of every animal while the rains purge the rest of an evil and vile world.

With a cast that also includes Jennifer Connelly, Ray Winstone, Logan Lerman, and Sir Anthony Hopkins, Noah washes ashore in theaters on March 28, 2014.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>