Quantcast
Channel: Movies – Den of Geek
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live

John Boyega linked to Terminator: Genesis role

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew3/26/2014 at 8:29AM

Attack The Block's John Boyega is seemingly on the wishlist for both Star Wars: Episode VII and Terminator: Genesis

John Boyega's impressive turn in Joe Cornish's Attack The Block has - a year or two on - resulted in him being quite an in-demand actor. Boyega is already on the shortlist, apparently, for Star Wars: Episode VII. And it's now being reported that he's potentially being lined up for a role in Alan Taylor's Terminator: Genesis too.

The role in question ties Terminator: Genesis back to Terminator 2, as he'd be playing the son of Miles Dyson. Dyson was, of course, the Cyberdyne engineer who was ultimately heavily responsible for Skynet doing what Skynet did.

Given that Star Wars: Episode VII and Terminator: Genesis are set to shoot at the same time, a tug of war for Boyega's services may well ensue. We'll keep you posted as we hear more.

Twitter.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

 


Arnold Schwarzenegger on the Terminator: Genesis story

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew3/26/2014 at 8:41AM

Fresh details on Terminator: Genesis, as spilled by Mr Arnold Schwarzenegger

Currently on the promotional trail for his new movie, Sabotage, Arnold Schwarzenegger has inevitably been facing questions about his return to the Terminator franchise while he's been on his travels. Turns out, Schwarzenegger is more than happy to talk about the upcoming Terminator: Genesis.

Chatting to MTV, he said that "Terminator deals a lot with time travel, so there will be a younger T-800 and then [there's] what that model does later on when it gets reprogrammed and who gets ahold of him". So we're going to get more than one version of the T-800 in the upcoming film then.

The fact that Schwarzenegger is a good deal older than the last time he played a Terminator has also been tackled. "The way that the character is written, it's a machine underneath. It's this metal skeleton". He added that "But above that is human flesh. And the Terminator's flesh ages, just like any other human being's flesh. Maybe not as fast, but it definitely ages".

Set for release on July 1st 2015, Terminator: Genesis is being directed by Alan Taylor, and will also start Jason Clarke, Emilia Clarke, Jai Courtney and J K Simmons.

MTV.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

 

Avengers Confidential: Black Widow & Punisher, Review

$
0
0
ReviewGavin Jasper3/26/2014 at 8:46AM

Frank Castle and Natasha Romanoff try to save the world from super terrorists in the Avengers Confidential animated movie.

If you go into Avengers Confidential: Black Widow & Punisher thinking that it's going to have anything to do with the Avengers, then you're going to be let down. Despite the commercial playing up Iron Man and Thor, those guys are barely in it at all. In fact, outside of Black Widow, the only Avengers to really say anything are Iron Man, Hawkeye, and Hulk. And Hulk is just growling really loudly, so that barely even counts!

Avengers Confidential takes place in the Marvel Animeuniverse, more notably as a follow-up to Iron Man: Rise of the Technovore. It's put together by animation studio Mad House and written by comic scribe Marjorie Liu. The story deals with SHIELD taking Frank Castle (Brian Bloom) into custody for mucking up one of their operations by getting involved and killing nearly every bad guy in the vicinity. He and Natasha Romanoff (Jennifer Carpenter) are reluctantly partnered together to go after Leviathan, a major terrorist sect, who according to Widow, is involved in everything bad ever.

The two discover Leviathan's plan to create an army of brainwashed super soldiers using superhero blood. One of the main players in this plot is a former SHIELD scientist named Elihas Starr (Grant George), who was once the love of Black Widow's life. In fact, he faked his own death and joined Leviathan for the sake of turning himself into a super soldier so he could consider himself "worthy" of Widow's love. The fact that he was just a lowly scientist and Natasha was part of a whole superhero lifestyle drove him mad even if she already loved him. You can probably figure out his entire storyline in this movie just from this starting point.

The best thing Avengers Confidential has going for it is the action. The opening few minutes (outside of the bizarre newspaper headline that says, "PUNISHER: HERO OR MURDER?") features a scene of Castle singlehandedly killing a couple dozen criminals and it's so good that you're kind of sad that the rest of the movie won't be exactly this. There are plenty of action sequences throughout the story and they all look fantastic. Though it's very much like watching somebody play Tekkenat times because while Black Widow will get the absolute crap kicked out of her, she'll get up just fine with no markings, no injuries, no blood, and no damage to her outfit.

There's also some questionable stuff in the fights. Frank and Natasha will occasionally air out their grievances by fighting to the death, including Frank trying to shoot her in the face at point blank range several times. They also do a silly bit where they punch each other's fists at the same time and try to push forward as if that would do anything. Oh, and Frank apparently has super speed the way he dashes forward at multiple points. Regardless, it's all pretty cool and super violent at times without showing much in terms of blood.

You're going to need those action scenes to get by because otherwise you'll be bored to tears during the first half. It's the problem with the concept. Frank Castle is cold and speaks in a monotone. Black Widow lacks emotion until the Elihas plot starts to really develop late in the story. Nick Fury (John Eric Bentley) is your average movie "badge on my desk" police chief, only he's in desperate need of a cup of coffee. When everybody talks and gives us info dumps on the plot, it will put you to sleep because there's absolutely no energy to be found. It's a huge contrast to when Amadeus Cho (Eric Bauza) – one of the most likeable Marvel characters introduced in the last decade – shows up and annoys you with his over-the-top personality and constant yammering about how he wants to kiss Natasha.

Iron Man (Matthew Mercer) doesn't appear until well after the hour point, but he's a complete breath of fresh air because he appears to have a pulse.

Brian Bloom as the Punisher is pretty spot-on, going as distant as you'd expect from the character. Carpenter's Black Widow is problematic. She shows no hint of being Russian, which I suppose is fine because the most famous depiction of the character got away with it, but it still irks me when they specifically bring up her Russian past yet there's not a hint of an accent. Mainly because it would have given her something. She has no personality and any time she tries to act upbeat, it feels completely forced. This is made worse when by design, she's supposed to be playing off a stone cold murderer.

There isn't even much of a dynamic, now that I think of it. At least, not enough for two stars of a movie. They argue in the beginning about Frank's "take no prisoners" approach against SHIELD's "gather intel from the smaller fish and then use it against the bigger fish" approach, but nothing much comes from that. Then it's all about whether or not mind-controlled people should be considered guilty for their crimes and that's neither delved into deeply enough, nor all that enticing.

I'd say that if you're going to check out Avengers Confidential: Black Widow & Punisher, do it because you want to watch a bunch of well-animated fight scenes or you want to see a strong animated depiction of Frank Castle that's allowed to stab people in the face. Otherwise, fast-forward through the dialogue and you should be good.

Just don't do it because Thor is on the cover. He honest to Odin has less than a minute of combined screentime.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

 

4

Disqus - noscript

Agreed, thought it was dull.

New Channing Tatum and Mila Kunis Character Posters From Jupiter Ascending

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow3/26/2014 at 3:57PM

Check out two new character posters from the Wachowski's Jupiter Ascending, featuring Channing Tatum and Mila Kunis both.

The new flick from the Wachowski Siblings is as slick and heavy on the killer sci-fi imagery you'd expect. Jupiter Ascending opens on July 25, 2014 and stars Mila Kunis and Channing Tatum engaged in some genetic sci-fi opera action that sounds seriously weird and thoroughly cool. Throw in Sean Bean for some geek cred and Cloud Atlas (and Iron Man 3) cinematographer John Toll for some stellar visuals, and Jupiter Ascending starts looking pretty good, doesn't it?

And now Warner Brothers has been kind enough to release us two awesome looking posters commemorating the release with both Channing Tatum and Mila Kunis left to whet appetites for the July release.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Jake Johnson Confirmed For Jurassic World

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow3/26/2014 at 4:23PM
Jurassic World

Jake Johnson confirms the long-anticipated news that he will be joining former collaborator Colin Trevorrow for Jurassic World.

In not necessarily the most surprising news, we still now have confirmation that New Girl’s Jake Johnson will be joining the cast of Jurassic World when the dinosaurs return to multiplexes again in 2015.

Johnson confirmed the non-rumor himself while sitting down with Huffington Post earlier today in promotion for his hit Fox sitcom.

When asked about whether he got involved with the fourth Jurassic Park film because it’s being directed by previous collaborator Colin Trevorrow (Safety Not Guaranteed), Johnson said, “Absolutely. Now, I'm also a huge fan of Jurassic Park. When I was growing up, and Jurassic Park came out, I freaked out like every other kid. I was born in '78, so I was, like, 12. If it wasn't Colin and someone said they wanted me in Jurassic Park, I would jump on it. The fact that it's Colin, written by Derek Connolly [who wrote Safety Not Guaranteed] and both those guys are personal friends, I'd go through a wall.”

Jake Johnson New Girl

Jurassic World is the fourth trip to Isla Nublar (or Isla Sorna) and its legendary inhabitants, just off the coast of Costa Rica. The film also includes the cast of Chris Pratt, Idris Elba, Bryce Dallas Howard, Vincent D’Onofrio, Jake Johnson, and Irrfan Khan. The film is set to raise its gates on June 12, 2015.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Deus Ex: The Short Film

$
0
0
NewsJohn Saavedra3/26/2014 at 4:31PM

Check out this awesome short film reimagining of Deus Ex: Human Revolution!

If there is one thing I love, it's a good science fiction shooter that also tells a good yarn, one that cuts through your brain with laser precision. For me, not many games come closer to the mark than Deus Ex: Human Revolution, the cyberpunk epic from Eidos Montreal -- except maybe its predecessors!

I'm kind of flabbergasted that there hasn't been a movie deal made yet for this franchise. It was basically made for the Tom Cruise scifi machine. Sure, it would be terrible, but the fact that no one has tried to whore it out to Hollywood yet is downright disrespectful. 

CBS Films said it was doing something with the franchise back in 2012, but there hasn't been much talk since. Maybe they're waiting for the inevitable current-gen installment to show its face at this year's E3? What do you think, guys, will we see some new Deus Ex action at this year's conference? It's about that time if you ask me.

Luckily, indie direct Moe Charif has stepped in to show us what a Deus Ex would look like done the RIGHT way. This little film, titled Human Revolution is so good it hurts. It reimagines protagonist Adam Jensen's story, awesome bio-augmentations and all! 

Can someone give this guy ALL the money so that he can turn this into a feature?

Check it out for yourself:

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Close-Up Of Dane DeHaan As The Green Goblin In The Amazing Spider-Man 2

$
0
0
News3/26/2014 at 4:52PM
The Amazing Spider-Man 2

Check out our first close-up of the Marc Webb version of the Green Goblin from The Amazing Spider-Man 2.

Jamie Foxx’s Electro may be the “main” big bad in Marc Webb’s The Amazing Spider-Man 2, but any True Believer worth his web-fluid should will know that any foe with the name “Goblin” in their name (particularly of an emerald hue) will inevitably be the one to watch…especially when you throw Gwen Stacy into the proceedings.

While we have long known that Dane DeHaan’s Harry Osborn will be skipping a step in this franchise when he supersedes papa Norman (Chris Cooper) by becoming the first Green Goblin. However, other than some fast-moving action clips and wide, wide shots on ensemble posters, we have not had a good look at Webb’s version of the green meanie…until now. Feast your eyes on the fiend below, released via Entertainment Weekly:

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 finds Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) fighting for his life against Oscorp’s newest freaks, including Electro (Jamie Foxx) and Rhino (Paul Giamatti), all while trying to balance a high school romance with Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone). Yet, when an old friend named Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan) comes back into his life, the secrets of Norman Osborn (Chris Cooper) and its villainous past reach closer to home than even Spidey can realize. Worse still, they may expand into his future.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 opens May 2, 2014.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Kermit & Miss Piggy interview: Muppets, Statham, Dudley

$
0
0
InterviewSimon Brew3/27/2014 at 7:43AM

We talk to Kermit The Frog and Miss Piggy about Muppets, the Midlands, and Jason Statham...

Arriving in UK cinemas on Friday is the eighth cinematically released Muppet movie, Muppets Most Wanted. And to celebrate, we got the rarest of honours: an audience with Miss Piggy and Kermit The Frog (there were other human beings in very close proximity to them, by the names of Steve Whitmire and Eric Jacobson, but you're not allowed to converse with them directly. Given the magnetic pull of the icons of their icons, that's an easy request to cede to).

Without further ado, here's how we got on...

For some reason, utterly unbeknownst to me, American movie goers haven't taken to your film in the numbers they should.

Piggy: Give them time...!

Kermit: We're working on it.

Well what I thought we could do was work out a few more future movie projects that might win them back over.

Kermit: Okay, okay.

So, for instance, a Miss Piggy origins movie is surely crying out to be done. They did it for Wolverine...

Kermit: Yeah, yeah.

Piggy: It's true, yes. That would be great.

But you are a lady of secrets. How much of your story are you willing to reveal on the big screen?

Piggy: Look, it's a movie. We can dress it up a little bit. We can make it up!

So The Pig Lebowski, something like that?

Kermit: I like that! The Pig Lebowski! I'm surprised I didn't think of that.

Well, you start the new movie off with pitches of possible movies. Which were the ones you didn't fit into that song?

Kermit: Now, let's see, what didn't we get in?

Piggy: Well, there was the disaster movie, where the world ends and we get married.

Kermit: Yeah, that's true, that's true.

Piggy: And live happily ever after.

Kermit: We have a post-apocalyptic marriage. Yes.

If you're going for your Oscar movie, you'd have the divorce and the coming back together, then the searing heart-breaking drama?

Kermit: That's a valid point. I suppose you couldn't do a divorce film unless you did a marriage film.

Piggy: Yes. Kermit! Let's get divorced!

Kermit: Yeah, let's skip straight to that.

Piggy: You see, if I get him to agree to divorce me...

Kermit: ... oh I see...

Piggy: Then we have to get married first!

Kermit: So I have to be put into a marriage situation first. I see, I see.

Do you have lots of riches Kermit, that Piggy can take in the divorce settlement?

Kermit: Nooooooo! It's just my little pad in the swamp. She won't get much.

Piggy: I don't even want half of that.

Obviously you've come back to England in this film. I'm from the Midlands, and if you're looking to go a bit grittier, why not try The Muppets Take Dudley? That would be far more convenient for me...

Kermit: Should we just do that? It could be a small independent film. Dudley? Like Dudley Moore?

Have you not been to Dudley?

Kermit: I have not.

Piggy: Would people like it if we took Dudley?

I think there would be significant cultural ramifications to you doing so.

Kermit: Are there moors in Dudley?

There's a zoo.

Kermit: A zoo?

But it's haunted. See: you've got a movie there...

Kermit: A haunted zoo? That sounds like a Muppet movie. Wow!

Horror is something you've not done. Fozziestein, something like that?

Kermit: That's true, that's true. We've talked about that for many, many years. Maybe doing some kind of Halloween thing. But we've never quite done it. I think it'd be great. We could get Alice Cooper to come back and work with us.

Piggy: The Muppets are pretty scary on their own.

Kermit: Some of them are.

What about Waldorf vs Statler? That'd be my dream horror movie...

Kermit: Yes! It's our horror movie every show!

So how do you go about auditioning your directors? You've allowed James Bobin back for a second time now.

Kermit: Well, he only had to audition for the first film.

Piggy: I didn't even know he was our director, until our premiere last night. I finally met him.

Kermit: You didn't spend that much time on the set.

Piggy: No, I spent most of my time in my dressing room.

With over 20 outfits, apparently. More than any Muppet in any Muppet film ever, apparently...

Kermit: Well she only wore 22 outfits, but she had, what, 350 in the room the choose from...

Piggy [nods]: Yes. Every time I came into the film, I wanted to make sure I was wearing something different.

Kermit: On screen, on set, morning, night...

Vivian Westwood has apparently said that she has one difficult customer a year, and that you were this year's...

Piggy: Well, I'm glad I made her list!

Were there any particular demands that you gave her that she couldn't meet?

Piggy: Well, I gave her some old plastic bottles and said here, you make a dress out of this, and I will wear it.

Kermit: And she did.

Piggy: She did. It was amazing.

Kermit: The wedding gown in the movie is all recycled plastic. It's true.

I take it you wrote the wedding scene into the film then Piggy?

Piggy: Oh no, no. I didn't write it. [Laughs] I merely demanded it.

So how was Celine Dion then? You've got a big number where she's graciously plays a supporting role alongside you...

Kermit: Well said.

She knows her place.

Piggy: We're very different, actually. It was a pleasure to have her join moi for my big number. And I hope it does something for her career, I really do.

Did you have to give her some extra singing coaching?

Piggy: No. I didn't want to embarrass her like that in front of so many people. So I just went into the studio later on and sang some of those high notes for her. The ones she couldn't hit.

There are a lot of small children who will meet you two for the first time off the back of Muppets Most Wanted. What would you want them to take from it?

Piggy: Our previous movie, The Muppets, was steeped in nostalgia. And it was fun for the whole family, but especially for those who had seen us when they were children. So I would like to do movies for children today. Like with this movie, so they will be nostaligiac for us another 20 years from now. It's all about keeping our careers going.

Kermit: Another 20 years when I'll be 80, and you'll be 30, right?

Piggy: I'm not going to be 30! [Huffs]

Kermit: I hope they laugh a lot. I think it's good that they laugh.

When I took my children to see your film, we ended up having a long chat about Jim Henson.

Piggy: You knew him didn't you?

Kermit: I met him once, yes.

When you two come to a new film, how dear to your heart does he remain, and what are the lessons you take from working with someone like that?

Kermit: Doing this because you like it. Doing this because you're driven to do it. It's nice for it to be successful, that's always nice. It's nice for critics to like it. But really, the only reason to do this is it's so much fun, and it's what you're driven to do.

Piggy: Kermit has always said that he just wants to make people happy. And that's something that you told me Jim had the same feelings about.

Kermit [nods]: He did, he did. He enjoyed making people laugh, and he always said that he wanted to make the world a better place for having being here.

Piggy: I did not know him but he sounds like a wonderful person.

Given your British heritage, I hope you'll indulge a particular UK success story for us. We always feel honour bound to salute the work of action movie star Jason Statham, and we like to ask people what their favourite film of his is. So what's yours?

Kermit: I feel horrible. I don't want to say that I don't know who Jason is, but you've caught me off-guard.

[A list of The Statham's movies is presented, and Kermit and Piggy peruse it].

Piggy: I don't know him either, but I like that his name kind of rhymes. Jason Statham, Jason Statham. Is that his real name?

[Piggy keeps reading the list]

Kermit: Oh wait, The Expendables 2? He's in The Expendables 2?! Which one is he?

He plays Lee Christmas.

Kermit: Oh! That's it! I like The Expendables.

[Piggy murmurs as she continues reading down the list]

Were you approached about The Expendables films? After Muppets Most Wanted, you're an action star!

Kermit: Well, yes. We were. I didn't have the body for it. Maybe next time. Maybe Expendables 3?

Piggy: I have not seen any of these movies! You cannot call him a movie star if I have not seen him. [Huffs again]

Kermit and Miss Piggy, thank you very much...

Muppets Most Wanted is in UK cinemas from Friday March 28th, and is now playing in the US. Read our review here.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

 


10 stories of excess from the production of Heaven's Gate

$
0
0
The ListsRyan Lambie3/27/2014 at 7:51AM

We look back at one of the most infamous film productions in history. Here are 10 stories of excess from Michael Cimino's Heaven's Gate...

In 1979, director Michael Cimino was at the height of his powers. Having just won five Oscars for his finely-honed, controversial Vietnam film The Deer Hunter, Cimino suddenly found himself in the enviable position of being able to make just about any project he wanted. The film he chose to pursue was based on the Johnson County War, a moment in 19th century American history where the conflict between settlers and wealthy landowners was at its height.

United Artists, with a reputation for fostering creativity and Oscar-winning films, eagerly agreed to make what would become Heaven's Gate, and set aside a generous budget of $11.6m to make it. Anxious to have the film in cinemas by the winter of 1979, making it legible for Academy Award nominations the following year, UA tried to have it written into Cimino's contract that Heaven's Gate had to be ready in time for Christmas.

Instead, Cimino managed to get UA to agree to a more complicated contract, and one that the studio would come to regret. The director pledged to make every effort to make Heaven's Gate in the allotted time. In return, any overspends Cimino incurred in his attempt to get Heaven's Gate ready for Christmas would be paid by United Artists, and would not be regarded as going over budget. Further, Cimino wouldn't be held responsible if, despite his best efforts, Heaven's Gate still missed its Christmas 1979 release date.

In effect, Cimino had coaxed United Artists into giving him almost complete creative and financial control over the project. The following article provides a brief insight into the legendary spending and excess that occurred, as related by United Artists' former vice-president Steven Bach in his 1985 book, Final Cut, and the 2004 documentary of the same name.

Both they and dozens of other articles printed 34 years ago chart the fitful progress of Heaven's Gate, from the pursuit of perfection to its infamous premiere in November 1980. United Artists may have wanted Oscars, but what they got was a nightmare.

1. The cast spent at least six weeks learning to roller skate

Before a frame of film was shot, Heaven's Gate's cast (which included Kris Kristofferson, Jeff Bridges, Christopher Walken and Isabelle Huppert) had to go on some extensive training courses, what Jeff Bridges later called "Camp Cimino". Lessons ranged from shooting to horse riding to cock fighting lessons to Yugoslavian dialect coaching. One early scene would see several prominent members of the cast dancing on skates, which required actors Kris Kristofferson, Jeff Bridges and Brad Douriff to spend hour after hour in training.

"They had to skate for a couple of hours a day, prop master Robert Visciglia said told the makers of the Final Cut documentary, "for maybe a week or two weeks."

Brad Douriff puts the length of time spent training at a much longer six weeks - enough time for the cast to become adept at waltzing around on skates for Cimino's lengthy scenes.

Deflatingly, for the actors involved, the roller skate waltzing scene was one of many, many sequences that ended up on the cutting room floor in the 149 minute 'directors' cut' of Heaven's Gate released in 1981.

2. Cimino would pick and arrange his extras one at a time - for every scene

Although films told on an epic scale are by no means unusual in Hollywood history, Cimino's obsessive attention to detail certainly was. Cimino spent huge amounts of time planning and creating every single shot, as he chose each individual extra - from a line-up of dozens - and arranged them around the set depending on their look and height.

"He would actually paint by selecting extras and putting them in the right place," recalls Vilmos Zsigmond, Cimino's cinematographer. "Pretty much like a painter would paint. He'd paint by picking people up and dropping them into place."

This process was made more laborious because of the sheer scale of the film - some scenes required 50 or more extras, all personally selected by Cimino. "It took time," Visciglia remembers. "Maybe a couple of hours to pick 50 people."

The end results are undeniably beautiful, with individual shots composed like Renaissance oil paintings. But the cost to United Artists, as Cimino single-mindedly pursued perfection, would soon add up to terrifying sums - it's estimated that, in the first week of shooting, just one and a half minutes of film had been racked up. The cost? An estimated $900,000.

3. Cimino would order "a minimum of 32 takes" for certain shots

Certain directors are famous (or infamous) for asking for multiple takes - Stanley Kubrick was but one such exacting filmmaker. But Cimino was unusual even by the standards of someone like Kubrick, as he not only demanded multiple takes for certain scenes, but also takes of the same few lines of dialogue delivered in multiple ways.

"I'm not used to doing 57 takes, I'm really not," Brad Douriff says. "I'm not used to doing a minimum of 32 takes. It was like workshopping on film - we did the happy version, we did the crying version, we did the furious version."

An entire day was spent shooting more than 50 takes of Kris Kristofferson drunkenly cracking a whip in a hotel room. The shot in the finished film is over in a matter of seconds. With Cimino demanding absolute creative freedom to make Heaven's Gate, the production quickly went behind schedule; within the first five days of filming, the film was already five days behind its target.

4. Cimino insisted on shooting his battle sequence in a field three hours' drive from the production's base of operations

Heaven's Gate's grandest set piece was - and is - its battle sequence between settlers and mercenaries. Requiring dozens of horses, extras, wooden wagons and explosions, it took weeks of planning and around a month of arduous filming. Just to make things even more difficult, Cimino had chosen for his battle location a field located some three hours' drive from his base of production in Kalispell, Montana.

Cast and crew were bundled into vans at 3:30 each the morning, still clutching their pillows so they could catch a bit more sleep as they were ferried to the location. When they finally got there, the day's filming was long and potentially even dangerous, as Cimino whipped up a dervish of dust, wagons and gunfire.

"I don't know how long we shot those battle scenes," Bridges remembers, "But it was frightening, some of it. Each time I'd pray to God that none of us got hurt. We'd just keep doing it over and over."

"We would ride around in a circle for three or four minutes at a gallop", recalled extra Eric Wood. "You've got wagons in the mix. Dust so you can hardly see."

Still, if the actors and extras were getting tired and frustrated, some of the crewmembers didn't seem to mind. "Hell, this picture can go on forever as much as I care," horse wrangler told Steve Bach. "My boys and I have never been paid like this. I looooove Montana!"

5. A gigantic irrigation system was installed to grow grass

The problem the producers faced was that, as well asfrom Cimino's award-winning stature, the actual footage he was producing looked spectacular - when Cimino begrudgingly showed off a few minutes of finished film a few weeks into the shoot, the producers were taken aback at how beautiful it looked. Cimino may have been taking a painfully long time to shoot even one page of his script, but at that point, UA were still convinced they could have a hit on their hands - an expensive one, admittedly - but a hit nevertheless.

It was when UA execs David Field and Steven Bach visited the set of Heaven's Gate that alarm bells started to ring again. The field Cimino chose for his climactic battle sequence? Not only was it costing a fortune to hire (from a tribe of native Americans, according to producer Joann Carelli), but it was also costing a fortune to irrigate.

Cimino, in his wild perfectionism, had decided that his battlefield had to be covered in lush, green grass. This meant that the land had to be cleared of rocks and an irrigation system had to be installed to encourage the grass to grow - meaning yet more expense.

"He's talking about hundreds of people and horses and wagons and explosives," Bach reasoned. "Who the hell is going to see grass?"

Any suggestions to Cimino that the grass was unnecessary - or that the battlefield location could, perhaps, have been a bit nearer to home - fell on deaf ears. It was all, he said, "part of the poetry of America". If Cimino wanted grass, then grass he would have.

6. Cimino made his cast and crew wait for the right clouds to roll over

One of the more celebrated stories from Heaven's Gate's oral production history is of Cimino's insistence on the right light and ambience while filming on location.

Key grip Richard Deats remembers it this way: "We'd started work at four in the morning with a dawn shot. We shot in the morning and the dawn was there. Then the clouds came in and we lost the light until it was totally overcast. And we waited. And we waited and we waited and we sat and we sat..."

"Michael was waiting for this weather to clear, and it was three o'clock in the afternoon and we hadn't had lunch yet", recalled key costumer Sandra Jordan. When someone finally plucked up the courage to ask whether it wasn't time the crew took a break to have a bite to eat, the director reportedly said, "Lunch? This is bigger than lunch!"

7. A train was rerouted especially for the production

When it came to Cimino's exacting methods - and his lack of interest when it came to lunch breaks - assistant editor Penelope Shaw summed it up best. "He thinks, there's that beautiful cloud. That'll be there for an eternity if I get it on film. Nobody will care about lunch 20 years from now, but they'll be able to see that visual I've created forever."

The problem was, Cimino's determination to craft the great American movie was resulting in some quite bizarre directorial choices. Legend has it that a tree was chopped down and relocated to improve the composition of a solitary shot. A gigantic set - of a Wyoming street circa 1892 - was built, torn down and completely rebuilt again because the director wanted the gap between the houses to be six feet wider.

Actor John Hurt spent so long waiting around on the production for something to do, he went off and made The Elephant Man for David Lynch in the interim, and then came back to shoot more scenes on Heaven's Gate.

Then there was the vintage locomotive Cimino wanted for the film. Too large to fit through modern railway tunnels, the thing had to be placed on the back of a truck and driven from its original resting place in a Denver, Colorado museum to Montana at presumably huge expense. The train appeared in the film for a matter of minutes.  

8. There were reportedly on-set 16 accidents in one day

By the time Heaven's Gate had gone 200 percent over its originally estimated budget in July 1979, United Artist's bosses had lost their patience. With other solutions to the Gate problem proving impossible to pursue - EMI turned down the offer to buy the production from UA, while firing Cimino could have caused the film to break down altogether - UA decided to fire Cimino's producer Joann Carelli instead. With the studio now in control as producers, Cimino effectively forced to work as the company's employee. The message was clear: stick to the budget and the schedule for the remainder of the shoot, or you'll lose the right to final cut.

Then, just as Cimino finally began to get Heaven's Gate back on schedule, the production's reputation in the eyes of the world's press took a major blow. A journalist named Les Gapay, having been refused a request to visit the set of Heaven's Gate, got a job as an extra on the set. Gapay spent two months getting paid $30 a day on Cimino's secretive production, and emerged with a story of obsession and excess that was quickly picked up by newspapers all over the world.

Gapay told of the chaos that ensued during the shooting of that colossal battle scene, where he claimed that extras had been "doing things that stunt men should do", and that 16 of them had been injured as a result.

"Because of the mad rush," Gapay wrote, "there are several injuries as the scene is filmed over and over for several days. Some of the immigrants, mostly extras, are brushed by horses and knocked into the mud. One minor actor has both feet stepped on by horses. Several persons tumble out of lurching wagons."

These and numerous other snippets from Gapay's expose were circulated in the news. Before production had even wrapped, Heaven's Gate would have to fight an uphill battle to prove to the public that it was a masterpiece and not an expensive catastrophe.

9. Cimino shot 1.3 million feet of film by the time filming ended

When the cameras finally ceased rolling in 1980, Heaven's Gate was about a year behind its original schedule - filming was supposed to have been over by June 1979, with a final cut delivered by September that year. Instead, Cimino had gone vastly over budget and schedule, and in his pursuit of perfection, had compiled an estimated 1.3 million feet of film - a staggering amount, and considerably more than the million feet of film said to have been shot during the troubled production of Apocalypse Now.

The problem Cimino and his team of editors now faced was a daunting one: they had approximately 220 hours of footage to comb through in order to compile their finished film. That finished film, as defined by Cimino's contract with United Artists, had to be three hours in length, or preferably shorter.

Imagine the studio executives' horror, then, when Cimino presented them with a work print that weighed in at an eye-watering five hours and 25 minutes.

"It's a little long," a hollow-eyed and visibly exhausted Cimino conceded. "I can lose maybe 15 minutes..."

10. Cimino turned his editing room into a fortress

Having viewed the incredibly lengthy early cut of Heaven's Gate, United Artists remained adamant about two things: one, they wanted a version short enough to be commercially viable, and two, they wanted the film out by Christmas 1980. They may have missed the 1979 festive slot they'd optimistically planned about 18 months or so earlier, but they were still determined to pull Oscar glory out of what threatened to become a public debacle.

Cimino was equally determined to get the final cut he wanted. With pressure mounting and the Christmas deadline looming, Cimino spent 18 hour days holed up in his editing room - and went to drastic measures to keep his precious footage away from the eyes of meddling executives.

"It's quite funny actually," recalls assistant editor Penelope Shaw. "He had bars put on the cutting room windows, and he had all the locks changed, so that nobody could come in. He said, 'I'm not showing it to them until I'm ready.'" One report even suggests that, just to be on the safe side, Cimino also had an armed guard blocking the entrance.

The cut of Heaven's Gate that emerged in the autumn of 1980 weighed in at three hours and 39 minutes - considerably slimmed down from the work print, but still far longer than United Artists wanted. If executives were angry at this still ungainly duration, it was far too late to do much about it - delay the production further, and they ran the risk of missing another Christmas release window, and with it any possibility of a golden statue at the Oscars.

Aftermath

The toxic reaction by critics at the Heaven's Gate premiere on the 19th November 1980 has since passed into legend. Vincent Canby's review for the New York Times quickly became one of the most quoted pieces of film criticism of all time; the words, "unqualified disaster" were repeated by news anchors and reprinted in newspapers worldwide.

Canby's statement that Heaven's Gate"fails so completely that you might suspect Mr Cimino sold his soul to obtain the success of The Deer Hunter and the Devil has just come around to collect," summed up the air of overwhelming negativity surrounding not only the film itself but its director.

If the Hollywood film industry can turn a director into a star and a celebrated artist overnight - as it had when Cimino won five Academy Awards for The Deer Hunter - then it can also turn against them just as quickly. Cimino's secrecy and perfectionism while making Heaven's Gate were regarded as arrogance by the press; his huge expenditure on the production angered some fellow filmmakers.

When reviews and articles about Heaven's Gate proliferated, its fate was sealed. After just one week, United Artists pulled the film and cancelled its wider release. Cimino wrote an open letter, published in trade papers, stating his intention to re-cut the film and release it in a tighter form. This shorter, two hour 29 minute cut surfaced in April 1981, but the poor reviews persisted, and audiences stayed away.

Heaven's Gate became a salutary lesson in Hollywood, as its failure ultimately saw investment corporation Transamerica sell United Artists to MGM. In the wake of other high-profile box-office failures, like Martin Scorsese's New York, New York and Steven Spielberg's 1941,Heaven's Gate was seen as the end of an era of director-driven productions.

Thirty-four years on, and Heaven's Gate has enjoyed a certain amount of critical reassessment, yet its title is still a byword for vast expenditure. But as well as a tale of excess and financial disaster, Heaven's Gate is also the story of a director seduced by his own grand vision. A crewmember once said that Cimino had fallen in love with his own movie. That adoration in turn led to an obsessive pursuit of what he thought was perfection.

Little could Cimino have known that his love affair with Heaven's Gate would not only jeopardise his career, but also change the American film industry forever.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

 

Godzilla 1985: Reboot or Rebirth?

$
0
0
FeatureJim Knipfel3/27/2014 at 7:52AM

Godzilla 1985, The 16th film in the Godzilla franchise, stomps the fine line between sequel, remake, and kickstart

In the early ‘70s it became clear to everyone, audiences and Toho executives alike, that the once-majestic Godzilla franchise was taking a precipitous slide down the crapper. There were reasons for this. A number of behind-the-scenes figures fundamentally responsible for the films’ early greatness (most notably director Ishiro Honda and special effects genius Eiji Tsuburaya) either left the franchise for other projects or died. Combine that with shrinking budgets that hit the special effects department first, and the on-screen results started looking pretty shabby. Increasingly tattered monster costumes were re-used from film to film; once-elaborate miniature cities became rows of balsa wood boxes, and as a last resort, fight scenes from earlier films were edited into new films to save time and money.

Beyond that Godzilla himself had changed, as had the stories surrounding him. Godzilla, that once fierce, unstoppable demonic metaphor for Japan’s atomic past had somehow morphed into a cuddly, funny, cute defender of Japan and a friend to children everywhere. Suddenly the films were targeted to the short pants crowd, but those crowds were starting to dwindle, and Toho was losing money. Americans in particular were coming to see Godzilla films as a punchline, as the cheapest of the cheap and the dumbest of the dumb. Even bringing Honda back to direct 1975’s Terror of Mechagodzilla didn’t help. Although it marked a definite uptick in quality, it may have come too late. So after the film’s release, producer Tomoyuki Tanaka decided it was time to take a break. After fifteen films (and all those life or death battles) Godzilla, like any other heavyweight, needed a breather to recharge his nuclear batteries. It would also give the writers a chance to come up with a few new ideas.

A decade later Godzilla finally returned to the big screen amid a blast of hoopla, fanfare, and even a little controversy. That the 1984 Japanese release was called simply Gojira like the 1954 original reveals that Toho’s intent here was to start over from the beginning, to recapture (but very self-consciously) the spirit of the original, and to essentially erase the mythology (and hopefully the reputation) created by all the films of the ‘60s and ‘70s. The American version released a year later drives this point home even more bluntly with the subtitle “The Legend is Reborn.”

Erasing Godzilla’s past had always been a part of the game. In film after film, although everyone knows Godzilla by name and immediately recognizes him, no one seems to recall he’d leveled Osaka just a year earlier and Kyoto a year before that. Here for the first time since the first sequel in 1955, people not only know Godzilla, but remember him for his one and only previous rampage 30 years earlier. Through most of the films that followed this would become the standard understanding, that Godzilla had only appeared that once in ‘54 and had not been seen since.

I think I’m getting a bit ahead of myself, here. Or maybe not. Director Koji Hashimoto’s film, while not exactly a reboot or sequel, is packed with visual and plot nods to the original, which again are only pounded home further by the US version. It’s an odd and lively amalgam of sequel and remake with plenty of in-jokes and a completely rewritten mythology. Best of all for fans, after all those years of putting up with a heroic, happy-go-lucky, dancing Godzilla, the King of the Monsters is mean as hell again. He’s not a friend to the children, he’s not a friend to anyone, and it’s reflected in a suit that returns to the sharper saurian design of his early days.

As in the original, the film opens with a fishing boat disappearing mysteriously, leaving one crew member and a (giant) living trilobite behind. When the sailor reports the boat had been attacked by Godzilla and a young reporter tries to write about it, he finds his story’s been killed for national security reasons and the sailor has been safely hidden away somewhere to keep him from yapping. It turns out, see, the prime minister remembers that first Godzilla attack all too well and doesn’t want to start a national panic, so the whole thing is hushed up in the dim hope the monster will simply go away. Well, no such luck.

Godzilla films, to a greater or lesser degree, have always reflected the times in which they were made. Since the world had changed a good deal over the course of 30 years, and since Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and the Lucky Dragon No. 5 incident were no longer quite as fresh in the minds of Japanese audiences, the politics of the film had to change as well to keep things relevant. This was the Reagan era after all, and Japan was merely a Cold War bystander. So when a Soviet sub sinks mysteriously and the US and Soviet Union both go on high alert, it’s the Japanese PM who has to intervene before the missiles start flying. He calls a press conference and admits publicly that no, no the sinking of the sub wasn’t an act of aggression on anyone’s part. It was just, y’know, Godzilla. Unfortunately no one outside of Japan seems to have the slightest clue who or what this “Godzilla” is. Not sure what that says about the state of international journalism in the mid-’50s, but I’ll let it slide. After the prime minister’s announcement, several interesting, even clever things happen.

First, much to everyone’s surprise, the US and Soviets team up to fight Godzilla themselves. This essentially means they want to fire a volley of ICBMs at Japan. The prime minister is understandably not tickled with this idea, but in terms of this film’s relationship with the original the plan would once again make Japan the target of potential nuclear annihilation.

Second, the young reporter, looking more into this whole Godzilla business on his own, finds a biophysicist who's been studying Godzilla ever since his parents died in ‘54. Back then Dr. Yamane concluded Godzilla was a dinosaur mutated by H-bomb tests, but this guy takes it a step further. After decades of research, the scientist describes the monster as “a product of civilization,” “a victim of our modern nuclear age,” and “a living nuclear weapon, destined to walk the earth forever.” In fact, we learn, Godzilla actually feeds on nuclear fuel. That’s why he attacked the sub and why whenever he stomps on land his first order of business is attacking nuclear power plants.

[related article: Godzilla 1998 - What Went Wrong?]

Beyond that, though (and this is kind of a big leap if you ask me), the biophysicist has also decided the prehistoric bird portion of Godzilla’s brain explains why he’s so attracted to flocks of birds. It’s a conditioned response, and he’ll follow the sound of chirping birds wherever they lead him. Yes, well...you see enough Godzilla films you simply learn to accept conclusions like that. The theories mark the first time since 1955’s Godzilla Raids Again that anyone has speculated about Godzilla’s nature, origins or motivations. Since then he’d simply been accepted as something that was always there and always would be, inexorable and indestructible, and he had something to do with nuclear bombs or something.

Third and most importantly though, in the US version Raymond Burr reprises his role as reporter Steve Martin, the only American to have witnessed the ‘54 attack and therefore the only American who knows anything at all about Godzilla. Now much older and fatter and bearded, he shows up at the Pentagon to help out, looking about as thrilled to be making a monster movie as he did in the original. This time might even be worse, given no one at the Pentagon even sees fit to offer him a chair.

It’s the first time since King Kong vs. Godzilla that new scenes with American actors were cut into a Godzillafilm for the US release. Here, though, it’s absolutely appropriate given the nature of the picture. The English scenes edited into the original to create Godzilla: King of the Monsterswere pretty painful. They were shot on a different film stock and mostly involved Burr standing against a blank wall looking all serious and sucking on a pipe as his translator explains what’s going on. Here at least he’s allowed to move around the set (probably looking for a chair) and interact with American actors (including the great Warren J. Kemmerling from Close Encounters). Burr’s Martin does his best, telling the generals that weapons are useless against Godzilla, that he needs to be treated like a force of nature, a hurricane or a tidal wave, but they have no time for any of chubby’s silly theories.

While the US military might be portrayed as a bunch of bumbling trigger-happy nitwits, the film’s real villains in the end are the Soviets, who had become the Nazis of ‘80s action films. Not only do they lie and cheat and set up a secret military operation in Tokyo Bay, they even launch a missile straight at Tokyo. Godzilla may be responsible for kajillions of dollars’ worth of pyrotechnic carnage, but he never did anything that rotten. Not in the last 30 years, anyway.

In another major shift from the original, the American scenes are often played for laughs (sometimes unintentionally in Burr’s case). In fact while the original was a dark and somber parable ending with Tokyo in flames and the streets filled with bodies, Godzilla 1985is a bright, fast-paced fantasy action film with great special effects and laughs scattered throughout. The change of tone was made evident to audiences even before the film began, with theatrical screenings in ‘85 opening with Marv Newland’s now-classic 1969 short, Bambi Meets Godzilla. Yeah, that’s kind of a tip off you aren’t gonna see a Bergman film, though after Fukushima scenes of Godzilla tearing into a nuclear plant as workers scramble to shut down the reactors might give some viewers pause. Godzilla 1985 isn’t much of a parable either, but then again none of the films after the original were parables. It does, however, begin to reinvent a Godzilla mythology for a new age, and remains a key film, a bridge between the lighter, goofier fairy tales which preceded it and the darker, more adult, and often more overtly political adventures that would follow.

Beyond all that it’s a great-looking film, with lively cinematography and rich colors replacing the sparse, washed-out look of the ‘70s. It represented a clean break and a new start for the series, a huge step forward that set the tone and visual style for the next ten years. It may not capture the spirit of the original, but it was a different time, and the film reflected the era with full consciousness of its own past. That was the important thing.

Oddly enough, although Godzilla here is much nastier than he’d been in years, it turns out to be a strangely sympathetic portrait. We see only a few bodies, he doesn’t spread radiation poisoning wherever he goes, and most of the damage he inflicts seems to be to property (though those damaged nuclear plants, as we all know, can be irksome). In fact the film, like the original, ends with a tragic suicide, though this time it’s Godzilla who takes the plunge. Following that, a sober (or at least half-sober) Burr offers a monologue in which he argues Godzilla is an innocent, a force of nature, a mere by-product of what we’ve created and so we can only blame ourselves for the mess he caused.

So is the film a reboot? A sequel? Good as it is, I think what the film really boils down to is a 90-minute, $20 million soda commercial. And this is where the above-mentioned controversy comes up. Product placement has been a part of movies forever. Nothing new in a corporation forking over a few bucks to insure the neon Blatz sign is visible in the bar scene or a character is driving a Dodge Dart. What was different here was the outrageous and single-minded extent of the product placement. Everyone’s drinking Dr. Pepper. There are cans of Dr. Pepper on everyone’s desk, and in one hilarious shot we even see two men having a serious conversation as the camera is centered and focused on the Dr. Pepper machine at the end of the hall. It seems the only one who doesn’t drink a Dr. Pepper here is Godzilla himself. But that’s only in the film proper, given it was a cross-promotional deal with Godzilla appearing in a series of Dr. Pepper commercials in which he does indeed hoist a can or two. Critics at the time raged that it set a frightening new standard and marked the beginning of an ugly new era of hypercommercialization. And you know, they were right.

But long soda commercial or not, Godzilla 1985 still injected enough fresh energy into the series to keep it going through another decade and a string of strong Godzillapictures. Then, after 1995’s Godzilla vs Destroyah, Tanaka once again decided it was time to take a break, given how well that seemed to work the first time. And that’s when Sony pounced...

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

Movies can teach people the need to be made aware of the dangers of nuclear power plants and
what to do if a radioactive release occurs! Anyone living close to a
nuclear power plant should keep enough of the natural detox mineral
zeolite on hand for themselves, families and employees to be able to
remove the radiation from their bodies! For more information on how
Zeolite works to remove both radiation and heavy metals from the body,
due a simple search for the single word Zeolite.

New Jupiter Ascending Trailer

$
0
0
TrailerDavid Crow3/27/2014 at 9:05AM

Watch the latest trailer from the Wachowski Siblings' sci-fi epic, Jupiter Ascending, featuring Mila Kunis and Channing Tatum.

The new flick from the Wachowski Siblings is as slick and heavy on the killer sci-fi imagery you'd expect. Jupiter Ascending opens on July 25, 2014 and stars Mila Kunis and Channing Tatum engaged in some genetic sci-fi opera action that sounds seriously weird and thoroughly cool. Throw in Sean Bean for some geek cred and Cloud Atlas (and Iron Man 3) cinematographer John Toll for some stellar visuals, and Jupiter Ascending starts looking pretty good, doesn't it?

In the new trailer, Jupiter (Mila Kunis) learns that no matter what she does, she was still born as intergalactic royalty, and royalty she shall remains as she enters a space opera battle over the deed to earth. The help of a roguish Channing Tatum and a sage like Sean Bean will surely come in handy.

Jupiter Ascending opens July 25, 2014.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

DC And WB Announce Plans For Batman's 75th Anniversary

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow3/27/2014 at 9:23AM

Check out the year-long events and activites planned to commemorate the Batman and his 75 years of pop culture dominance.

For a guy who has turned 75, the Batman seems remarkably in good health as he continues to be the world’s most popular superhero. And as the centerpiece of the DC universe, the comic titan, as well as fellow Time Warner company Warner Brothers, want to celebrate the event in style. That is why they released the above icon commemorating the event, not to mention the below press release that announces year-long plans to celebrate the big one.

To mark the milestone 75th anniversary of DC Comics’ Batman, Warner Bros. Entertainment and DC Entertainment have revealed plans for a year-long celebration befitting the world’s most popular Super Hero. Highlights of the anniversary program, which starts today, include a new commemorative 75th anniversary Batman logo and an exclusive “Cape/Cowl/Create” art exhibit, featuring 20 contemporary artists’ interpretation of The Dark Knight’s iconic cowl headpiece and cape from the upcoming Batman: Arkham Knight videogame. There will also be 75th anniversary-related activities across all of Warner Bros. Entertainment throughout the year.

First appearing in the comic book Detective Comics #27, which hit newsstands on March 30, 1939, featuring artwork by Bob Kane and a script by Bill Finger, Batman emerged from the shadows to become the world’s most popular Super Hero and dominate all media. In feature films, TV shows, radio, video games, publishing and merchandise, this most human of Super Heroes has battled some of fiction’s greatest villains using his intellect, cunning and an arsenal of gadgets to further his quest for justice.

“Batman is an incredibly important property with multi-generational appeal across all of the Studio’s businesses, and we’re proud to celebrate this milestone anniversary,” said Kevin Tsujihara, Chief Executive Officer, Warner Bros. Entertainment. “From billion-dollar blockbuster films to TV, home entertainment, video games and consumer products, The Dark Knight continues to resonate with audiences worldwide and rightfully deserves his place as a global pop culture icon for the ages.”

Batman is the single most successful Super Hero film franchise in history and there have been more theatrical movies released based on Batman than any other comic book character. In video games, the Batman Arkham franchise is also the most successful Super Hero game concept ever. Batman consistently breaks records in every incarnation of his character and remains the gold standard by which all other comic book sales are measured.

“Batman is one of the greatest characters ever created, in comics or elsewhere, and even after 75 years he continues to wildly fascinate fans. He is an integral part of pop culture and has successfully captured the imagination of the entire world,” said Diane Nelson, President of DC Entertainment and President & Chief Content Officer, Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment. “The origin of Batman, Bruce Wayne and the famous citizens of Gotham are legendary and likely a story you know inside out, even if you’ve never picked up a comic book in your life, and that speaks volumes to the character’s immense popularity and the constructs of the original mythology.”

The first published adventure of The Bat-Man (as he was then known) was in the May 1939 issue of Detective Comics #27, conceived of and drawn by a 22-year-old Kane with his frequent collaborator, Bill Finger, scripting the story. The character was so successful, that one year later the first comic book devoted exclusively to the Caped Crusader’s adventures, Batman #1, hit newsstands. In that issue, Batman battled The Joker and Catwoman for the first time.

Now, DC Entertainment and the Studio’s various divisions, including Pictures, Television, Animation, Interactive Entertainment, Home Entertainment and Consumer Products, will mark this extraordinary 75th anniversary with a range of highly anticipated events and products.

The new commemorative logo, also released today across social media and websites, takes its cue from the famed Bat symbol, and features block-style lettering of “75 Years.” The mark will be rolled out on Batman-related promotions, products and initiatives.

Key activities planned for the Batman 75th anniversary celebration include:

DC Entertainment– DC Entertainment has an action-packed year filled with new Batman titles, commemorative issues and variant covers, including the recently released special edition of Detective Comics #27 commemorating Batman’s first appearance in the book in 1939, the new weekly series Batman Eternal launching April 9, and upcoming exclusive Batman variant covers planned for San Diego Comic-Con International in July.

Batman Day– DC Entertainment is also partnering with thousands of comic retailers, book stores and libraries for “Batman Day” on Wednesday, July 23. Each location will host a Batman 75th anniversary celebration and offer fans a free, special edition Batman comic.

Interactive Entertainment– Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment has invited celebrated fashion designer Asher Levine to create a cape and cowl based on the Batsuit of the recently announced Batman: Arkham Knight videogame developed by Rocksteady Studios. Favorite contemporary artists will have the opportunity to use the replicas as a blank canvas to produce their own, original interpretations of Batman’s iconic attire for an all new “Cape/Cowl/Create” art exhibit that will be showcased at San Diego Comic-Con International in July.

Home Entertainment– Warner Bros. Home Entertainment will bring fans an array of new Batman titles throughout the year, including the highly anticipated release of the Batman ’66 TV series for the first time ever. Other new releases include animated films Son of Batman (May 6) and Assault on Arkham (summer 2014). Additionally, a 25th Anniversary Edition of Tim Burton’s Batman feature film will be released in the fall.

Animation– Warner Bros. Animation has created two all-new Batman animated shorts set for debut in April, with fan-favorite producers Bruce Timm (Batman: The Animated Series) and Darwyn Cooke (Batman Beyond) each presenting a unique and familiar take on the Batman animated universe. In addition, Timm will participate in a Batman 75th all-star panel at WonderCon in Anaheim on Saturday, April 19, which will also feature an exclusive premiere of Cooke’s animated short based upon Batman Beyond.

Television– Warner Bros. Television is in production on the pilot episode of the highly anticipated Gotham, a new one-hour drama for FOX which explores the origin stories of eventual police commissioner James Gordon and the villains that made Gotham City famous. In Gotham, Detective Gordon (Ben McKenzie – Southland) will encounter a familiar cast of characters – including a young Bruce Wayne – as he fights to keep the city safe. Executive producer Bruce Heller (The Mentalist, Rome) wrote the pilot, which is being directed by executive producer Danny Cannon (CSI series, Nikita).

Pictures– As Batman’s 75th anniversary is celebrated in 2014, Warner Bros. Pictures will begin production of Zack Snyder’s untitled Superman/Batman film starring Henry Cavill, who reprises his role as Superman/Clark Kent, and Ben Affleck as Batman/Bruce Wayne. The film, slated for release summer 2016, will bring the two most iconic Super Heroes of all time together for the first time on the big screen.

Consumer Products– Warner Bros. Consumer Products has partnered with an array of licensees to celebrate Batman’s 75th Anniversary through special edition and limited-release products. From the classic 1960s TV series to modern day comics, Batman’s presence will be larger than ever in celebration of his legacy through everything from toys to t-shirts.

DCComics.com– For the latest information and exclusive content celebrating Batman’s 75th anniversary, visit Batman75.com. The dedicated section on DC Comics’ website launches today with the Batman 75 Sweepstakes which offers one lucky fan a one-of-a-kind prize package.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Samuel L Jackson: smaller Nick Fury role in Avengers 2

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew3/27/2014 at 9:33AM

It doesn't look like you'll be getting much Nick Fury for your money in Joss Whedon's Avengers: Age Of Ultron...

In Marvel's new movie, Captain America: The Winter Soldier, you get a fair amount of Samuel L Jackson's Nick Fury for your money. Jackson, who has a nine picture deal with the studio, has perhaps his most substantive part to play yet as Fury in the new film.

But going into Joss Whedon's Avengers: Age Of Ultron, Nick Fury's role in that movie is set to be a lot smaller. Jackson himself confirmed this to Yahoo Movies, saying that "I'm just kind of passing by there, you know. I'm not doing so much". He added that "it’s another one of those ‘people who have powers fighting people who have powers’. That’s why I didn’t get to New York in The Avengers. There’s not a lot I could do except shoot a gun".

Yahoo also reports that Anthony Mackie is unlikely to appear in The Avengers 2.

The main first unit shoot of Avengers: Age Of Ultron kicks off in a week or two, ahead of the film's release next summer. 

Yahoo.

 

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Gets First Full Trailer

$
0
0
TrailerDavid Crow3/27/2014 at 12:23PM
teenage mutant Ninja Turtles movie tmnt 2014

Watch the full new trailer for August's Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, starring Megan Fox and William Fichtner, right now!

Like the a three-fingered “Cowabunga,” the Internet is about to high-five itself with excitement over the new Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles movie, which we are seeing the first trailer for right now!

Check out the new, very tall, and very CGI turtles, in the video below. And also, does it appear that the Shredder will have a role in the Turtles' mutant ooze origin this time?

Nothing says “relaunch” like Michael Bay. The producer, who turned quaint 1980s nostalgia for the Transformerscartoon and action figures into a billion-dollar blockbuster juggernaut series, is now producing the live-action TMNTreboot. And he’s reuniting with reconciled leading lady Megan Fox if you didn’t see the parallel already. Directed by his buddy Jonathan Liebesman (Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning, Battle: Los Angeles), Bay’s new Ninja Turtles movie promises to be a departure from the many cartoons and Jim Henson original films, as the CGI adolescents are now fighting William Fichtner as the Shredder.

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and a half-shell hit theaters on August 8, 2014.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

They wanna keep the martial arts secret I guess. That's what I wanna see

3 New Pics From Dawn Of The Planet of The Apes

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow3/27/2014 at 1:05PM

Check out three new images from the behind-the-scenes work on Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, including of Andy Serkis as Caesar.

The Apes may have risen in 2011, but only now is the dawning of their world at hand, and 20th Century Fox has been proud to release (via Empire) three new behind-the-scenes pictures of Jason Clarke, Keri Russell, director Matt Reeves, and Andy Serkis in motion-capture as he brings the chimp conquroer Caesar to life once more. Enjoy these new pictures of behind-the-scenes work on Dawn of the Planet of the Apes.

In Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, superb character actors Jason Clarke, Keri Russell, and Gary Oldman are getting to lead an ensemble that still sports Andy Serkis as benevolent ape king, Caesar, in a world where the apes truly rule. And with Matt Reeves at the helm, director of the vastly underrated Let Me In, Fox again has a mystery box of a franchise film that we cannot wait to unwrap.

Dawn of the Planet of the Apes begins July 11, 2014.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


New Clip From How To Train Your Dragon 2

$
0
0
TrailerDavid Crow3/27/2014 at 1:32PM
How To Train Your Dragon

Check out the newest clip from How to Train Your Dragon 2 with Hiccup and Toothless getting into an itchy situation while scouting.

They grow up so fast. First, it’s all about breathing fire onto the side of mountains with villainous, bigger dragons, and then it’s already time for the sequel. Look no further than this newest clip for How to Train Your Dragon 2 to discover how far Hiccup and Toothless have come as the prepare for what looks to be…itchy.

Promoted as the second chapter of an epic How to Train Your Dragon Trilogy, this installment returns to the fantastical world of the heroic Viking Hiccup and his faithful dragon Toothless.  The inseparable duo must protect the peace – and save the future of men and dragons from the power-hungry Drago.

The film returns cast members like Jay Baruchel, Gerard Butler, Craig Ferguson, America Ferrara, Jonah Hill, Christopher Mintz-Plasse and Kristen Wiig to this world, while also adding newcomers Kit Harington, Cate Blanchett and Djimon Honsou.

How to Train Your Dragon 2 opens June 13, 2014 in 3D.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Noah Review

$
0
0
ReviewDon Kaye3/27/2014 at 2:26PM

Russell Crowe’s towering performance as Noah anchors this majestic if messy saga from the mind of Darren Aronofsky.

Here’s what Noah is not: it is not a pious retelling of the brief story of the Great Flood as recounted in one particularly famous book of fables and myths, even though it is deeply reverent and spiritual. It is also not an empty CG spectacle, even though it features giant creatures made of rock and the Earth’s surface being scoured clean by the world’s biggest tsunami. It is not a typical bloated Hollywood blockbuster from a filmmaker given too much free rein, even though it cost an estimated $125 million and its director has never made a movie for more than $35 million before.

In other words, Noah could have easily fallen into any of the above categories and been doomed to artistic failure (box office is another story that is yet to be told). But while the film is flawed in many ways, Noah is also a unique, entertaining and at times profoundly moving experience. There has been no Biblical Epic like this before, and very few studio tentpoles like it either. Director Darren Aronofsky (Black Swan), while submerging some of his stylistic trademarks in the service of this story, has nevertheless applied his uncanny ability to create fresh takes on genre films to both the religious saga and the fantasy blockbuster in one fell swoop.

We are all familiar with the basics of the story, which Aronofsky and co-screenwriter Ari Handel flesh out with research from the Book of Enoch and other scholarly texts and studies. A brief recap of Biblical myth brings us up to speed on the fall of Adam and Eve and the murder of Abel by Cain. Cain’s descendants go off and, with the help of fallen angels known as Watchers, create an industrial civilization that is slowly poisoning the Earth. The descendents of the third brother, Seth, become simple folk who live off the land and take care of it.


When we meet Seth’s descendant Noah (Russell Crowe) and his family – wife Naameh (Jennifer Connelly) and young sons Shem, Ham and Japheth – they are trying to live up to those ideals, even though the land is desolate, food is scarce and marauders from the city roam the region. But then Noah gets a vision that the Creator (who is never referred to as “God”) has had enough of humankind’s evil ways and wants to wipe the Earth clean with water. His vision is confirmed by his grandfather, Methuselah (Anthony Hopkins), who helps Noah retrieve the rest of the message: he is to build a vast ark and save two of every animal in order to start over once the human race has been eradicated from creation.

Noah sets about the task at once and spends years building the ship with the help of his now grown sons, his adopted daughter Ila (Emma Watson) – who the family saved as a child from the site of a massacre – and the Watchers, who see this as their way to redeem themselves in the eyes of the Creator for their sin of introducing knowledge to humankind. Noah never questions the job he has been tasked with. But there are many obstacles in his path, not the least of which are the city dwellers, led by Tubal-cain (Ray Winstone), who would like to reserve some rooms on the ark as well and are ready to do anything to get onboard.

[related article: The Resurrection of the Biblical Epic]

To me, the most interesting films based on religious stories have been the ones made by those who have stepped outside the organization. Martin Scorsese, a lapsed Catholic, was able to beautifully show us the humanity of Jesus and the stakes of the sacrifice he makes in The Last Temptation of Christ, and here Aronofsky, who was raised around Judaism but is now reportedly an atheist, understands that the story of Noah is a pure fable, with no basis in reality at all, and that allows him to envision the story the way he wants to see it without denying any of its spiritual power. In fact, the basic themes of Noah– our relationship with nature, our relationships to ourselves and our family, whether humankind is essentially wicked, and the qualities of mercy and faith – are intensely relevant to the modern world. To say, as some of the film’s detractors (most of whom haven’t seen it) have, that the movie has a pro-environmental message is reductive and lazy: who doesn’t want to protect and preserve the environment? Who doesn’t want to live in a beautiful, unspoiled world? (How we get there is another discussion for another place.)

And to say that the movie paints Noah as a bad man himself – well, no, it just portrays him as human, with the same flaws and weaknesses as any other man or woman. There’s a great scene in which Noah tells Naameh that their family wasn’t given the task of building the ark because they’re such great people, and he proceeds to list each family members’ issues. By the time the ark has been in the water for months and Noah faces another grave decision regarding the fate of his family, he has been driven nearly insane by the burden – and what normal person wouldn’t? Make him some sort of perfect, saintly superhero and the story loses all of its emotional strength.

While the themes and subtexts are eloquent and forceful, the execution is ultimately a mixed bag. Crowe is outstanding as Noah, delivering what is easily one of the most complex and deeply felt performances of his life, but the supporting players around him seem smaller in comparison. Part of the problem is the way they are written: Connelly’s Naameh just stands around looking concerned for the first half of the movie, only getting her chance to shine with her actions later in the film, while Hopkins is tonally quirky and Winstone plays the big bad with little nuance. Shem (Douglas Booth) and Japheth (Leo McHugh Carroll) get little to do. But the biggest problem character is Ham. While Shem and Ila fall in love, Ham is denied the chance to  take a woman on the ark with him – a point driven home brutally when Noah forces him to abandon one potential bride to her death -- and spends the rest of the movie as first a pouting and then vengeful brat. Lerman doesn’t have the range yet to portray him as much more than that.

On the production side, Aronofsky’s vision of the pre-Flood world is beautifully, eerily realized. This is our world, but not: it’s a strange, ancient time that feels as remote to us as our civilization will feel to those who follow us thousands of years from now (assuming we’re still around). The stars are hanging differently in the sky and the air feels charged with the supernatural. The stone-encrusted Watchers, when we first see them, fit well into this design and their “origin” story is one of the film’s most striking sequences, but the more I watched, the more they reminded me of the Ents from The Lord of the Rings.

The whole first half of the film, in fact, feels more like Peter Jackson’s trilogy than anything Cecil B. DeMille ever dreamed up; it’s only in the second half that the film’s core spirituality, humanism and compassion surface. They do have to battle for screen time with more conventional melodramatics -- including the standoff between Noah and Ham and the discovery of a lethal stowaway on the ark -- and the film’s climax feels as frenzied as any standard blockbuster ending. But the more profound moments – such as Noah’s recounting of the story of Creation, which neatly encompasses the theory of evolution, and the arrival of the animals – stand out more starkly in comparison.


In the end, Aronofsky is committed to his vision even though it seems as if he barely has it under control at times, and while the film stumbles it is never boring and always fascinating. Kudos must go to cinematographer Matthew Libatique and composer Clint Mansell for making Noah a visual and musical feast. Cinematic spectacle, cautionary fable and, if you’re so inclined, religious text – Noah is all these things in some way, and while the parts don’t  always work together smoothly, the fact that the filmmaker even tried makes this powerful and even must-see viewing.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

7

Disqus - noscript

best review yet for the film, don!

Sabotage Review

$
0
0
ReviewDavid Crow3/27/2014 at 6:09PM
Sabotage

Aiming to be a hard-boiled comeback for Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sabotage woefully misses its target despite all the heavy star power.

It sits there, mockingly, when the toilet water rushes over it. Smeared and baptized in the fluids of urinal cakes, the antagonistic gun awaits the grasping hand of decrepit hero cop John “Breacher” Wharton’s latest enemy, a DEA pencil-pushing pencil-neck, who must now get his gun where many a pencil has left its mark. It is also the second consecutive scene in Sabotage to literally rely on toilet humor for its entertainment. And in the toilet the rest of this movie belongs too.

Alas, poor Arnold, we know you too well. And that was before the less than uplifting end to your gubernatorial legacy. Whatever one has to say about his choices, both on and off the screen, Arnold Schwarzenegger has an undeniable charisma, goofy as it may seem. Over six feet of Übermensch, the Austrian mountain has cut an impressive figure many times when mowing down countless bad guys with little more than his pecks (and a couple battalions worth of bullets). However, the real secret throughout the years is that he’s just as likely to knock them dead by yucking it up as he is from gunplay. Unless Schwarzenegger is playing a homicidal cyborg from the future, he works best when the puns are as plentiful as the explosions. Thus, Sabotage’s biggest misfire is its woefully miscalculated sense of seriousness and melodrama. Directed by David Ayer, who had just earned some respectability thanks to End of Watch, this film hopelessly reaches for thrilling suspense, but comes up with something far deadlier: boredom.

Starring a crew of DEA badasses who live somewhere near the border of Mexico, as well as the border of common sense, our rowdy wild bunch of heroes have been making a mockery of Mexican drug cartels for years, not to mention of their profession. Acting more like the latest Vince McMahon masterminded nWo stable of charismatic heels than any division of law enforcement, these are a bunch of cut-ups trying way too hard to sell red neck machismo at the strip club and shooting ranges when they aren’t getting themselves shot.

Sabotage

Led by a dangerously dour Schwarzenegger in the role of Breacher, an old school cop still grieving over the deaths of his wife and son at the hands of a Mexican drug cartel, the rest of crew’s ciphers are filled out by Joe Manganiello as Grinder, Terrence Howard as Sugar, Josh Holloway as Neck, and Mireille Enos as Lizzy, the token woman who proves she can run with the boys by being the only one who likes to do her killing while on meth. She is also married to Breacher’s second-in-command, Monster, played by a surprisingly passable Sam Worthington. With a two-foot beard worthy of Duck Dynasty, Worthington provides an unrecognizable, but sympathetic turn as the group’s spiritual and emotional guru. Then again, it might help that he is the only one who gives a coke line that they’re getting killed off one-by-one.

The main gist of the plot is that after the group steals $10 million from their latest drug bust—and then proceeds to lose that money under mysterious circumstances—they are then slowly murdered like ten little hillbillies by what they at first assume is a cartel. With each death being more spectacular than the last in its gory details, Olivia Williams as local investigator Caroline Brentwood is called in to state the obvious about one of them killing the others and then to feign interest in Schwarzenegger’s glossy-eyed magnetism.

Schwarzenegger is still a movie star of sorts, but this is not the kind of film that is going to return him to the top of the heap. Confused and haunted by past sins was always Stallone’s shtick; Arnold’s contrast was the raised eyebrow, the lit cigar, and the perfectly delivered groaner punctuating every other scene. While this film has a few humorous nods to the former governator’s impressive political career, and his Mr. Universe iconography as at least defined by SNL, Ayer and co-screenwriter Skip Woods ignore decades of evidence to the contrary when they cast the Kindergarten Cop in a dramatic light. Silent, reserved, and constantly mourning his dead family, which he shows about as much visible anger over losing as he would at dropping a quarter down a sink, this is a stoic performance that ultimately resembles a stone. Unless it’s in a James Cameron franchise, he needs to be having a good time smirking at the ridiculousness surrounding him if the audience has any hope of doing so.

Sadly, that too seems like an industrial pipe dream in a movie that is as willfully ugly, coarse, and all around unappealing as picking up that aforementioned firearm. Closer to Ayer’s Street Kings than End of Watch, it also would fit nicely on a shelf that included Skip Woods’ other scripted masterworks, such as Swordfish, Hitman, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, and A Good Day to Die Hard. There is plenty of R-rated violence, including disemboweled organs and severed eyeballs, but all the teeth-gnashing in this movie is as fun as a root canal.

Sabotage review

A 90-minute slap-and-dash with so little plot that the picture never once thinks to depict the supposedly tight-knit DEA group as distraught over its increasingly dwindling numbers, Sabotage is as sharp as a bag of hammers. When the third act reveals who is doing the killing and who has the money, it will matter less to you than whether that earlier DEA brownnoser ever picked his gun up. At least in that conflict there was an element of suspense.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

2

Disqus - noscript

"Alas, poor Arnold, we know you too well." Very funny but . . . wow! That opening paragraph describes scenes it will take a while to forget. Great review, but a sad commentary on the former governor's current Hollywood career.

Universal Puts Out First Trailer for The Purge: Anarchy

$
0
0
TrailerTony Sokol3/27/2014 at 11:27PM

One night a year, criminals rule the streets in the new trailer for The Purge: Anarchy.

Universal released the first official trailer to its new action horror flick The Purge: Anarchy, the sequel to The Purge.

Is it me or does The Purge have some kind of The Warriors vibe? Maybe it’s the masks. Whatever it is, I’m thinking this is going to be a cult film. James DeMonaco’s sequel The Purge: Anarchy looks kind of like Hunger Games in the streets. The trailer says Some do it for revenge, some do it for fun and some do it just to see if they’ll survive. But deep down, everyone participating in the annual Purge really just wants to take out Ethan Hawke. Spoiler Alert, they don’t find him, not even in the credits.

The Purge: Anarchy looks pretty far removed from the first one. Here the New Founding Fathers of America furlough the cops and the EMT workers and let everyone go nuts for a night at a block party called the annual Purge.

The Purge: Anarchy stars Zach Gilford as Shane, Kiele Sanchez, Frank Grillo, Michael K. Williams, Carmen Ejogo and Edwin Hodge as Dwayne. It hits theaters on Friday, June 20, 2014.

SOURCE: HUFFINGTON POST

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

The Raid 2 Review

$
0
0
ReviewDon Kaye3/28/2014 at 8:20AM
The Raid 2 Rama

With The Raid 2, director Gareth Evans delivers more stunning action while expanding his story into a crime epic.

Welsh director Gareth Evans astonished audiences in 2011 with his second film, The Raid (known in the U.S. as The Raid: Redemption), which introduced Western moviegoers to the Indonesian martial arts form known as pencak silat. With The Raid 2 (original title: The Raid 2: Berandal), he’s delivered the same hyper-intense action and violence that the first film did, while expanding his story and fleshing out his characters just enough to make a movie that feels at times like a genuine crime epic.

The Raid took place in one setting, a dismal, labyrinthine apartment block in a Jakarta slum  through which a team of police officers had to fight their way floor by floor to reach the crime lord ensconced at the top. The plot was simple and blunt, propelled mainly by the nonstop onslaught of bloodshed, gunplay and hand-to-hand combat. But the ending of the film hinted at larger things, as rookie cop Rama (Iko Uwais) learned that higher officials in the police department were in cahoots with the crime boss Tama. These threads are picked up in The Raid 2, which begins moments after the ending of The Raid and develops the story into a larger web of corruption.

Rama faces a decision almost as soon as leaving the apartment block: continue his investigation and go undercover into the criminal underworld – where he can finally lay bare the connections to Jakarta’s political structure – or risk losing his family and his life when those same higher-ups send their minions after him. The choice is clear: Rama adopts the thug identity “Yuda” and gets sent to a brutal prison, where he ingratiates himself with Uco, the vicious and petulant son (Arifin Putra) of a prominent crime boss.


The Raid 2 Prison

Once they’re out of prison, Uco recruits Rama into their organization, where the undercover cop quickly impresses the boss, Bangun (Tio Pakusadewo), and rises in the ranks. As he climbs into the inner circle, however, Rama becomes enmeshed in a deadly struggle for power between father and son that involves both local criminals and the powerful Japanese mob that has ruled the city’s underworld peacefully with Bangun – until that peace threatens to collapse.

To be sure, Evans (who lives and works in Indonesia) is not doing anything groundbreaking plotwise: you can see where he lifts from both The Godfather and The Departed in equal measure. But more time is devoted to giving the characters some breathing room. Bangun is the weary overlord who just wants to run his business and avoid any violence, while Uco is the son whose feelings of being underappreciated by his father make a toxic mix with his own greedy ambitions. You can see where it’s all going, but Evans keeps everything moving so quickly and smoothly that the well-worn story sucks you in anyway. He aids his cause with some terrifically bizarre supporting characters, including the dapper, up-and-coming gangster Bejo (Alex Abbad), Bangun’s loyal hitman Prakoso (Yayan Ruhian, The Raid’s Mad Dog) and the brother-sister assassination team Hammer Girl (Julie Estelle) and Baseball Bat Man (Very Tri Yulisman).


The Raid 2 Hammer Girl

And then, of course there is the action and the pencak silat. Perhaps mindful that some of the novelty may have worn off from The Raid, Evans stages his action sequences in different, inventive ways this time, switching from handheld, in-close shots to wider, almost painterly compositions, such as one striking image of cops and prisoners writhing in the mud of the prison yard. He expands the range of action as well, delivering a car chase that is simply jaw-dropping not just because it’s all done practically but because there is a separate, ultra-violent fight happening within the confines of one of the cars as it barrels down a Jakarta boulevard with several other vehicles in pursuit.

That car sequence is pretty hard to top, so by the time we get to the climactic battle – in which Rama, naturally, must fend off one assassin after another on his own – you might expect a little battle fatigue may set in. But it doesn’t, and I was somewhat surprised to learn that we gotten to the end of this very lengthy film (148 minutes) so relatively quickly. Evans never lets the energy flag, his performers are all committed (especially the tireless Uwais, who also choreographed this thing with Ruhian) and the incredible and complicated ballet of violence and martial arts that is the movie’s backbone provides one visceral thrill after another. The Raid 2 is certainly not for everyone – the violence can get quite stomach-churning at times, even for hardened viewers – but it cannot be dismissed as mere exploitation. It’s often extraordinary filmmaking, and leaves me curious about where Evans will go in the future.


The Raid 2 final fight

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

8
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>