Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Paramount to Turn World War Z and Star Trek Into Darkness Into Double Feature
New International Trailer for 47 Ronin
15 greatest single location-thrillers of the last decade
Playing on our fears of being trapped and alone, the single-location thriller updates old haunted house and home invasion stories to include new, more inventive locations, and it seems that filmmakers haven’t yet run out of ideas of how to scare the living daylights out of us. Some have played on modern fears of corporate meddling or reality television, while others have simply tried to expand their locations to icy prisons and public places.
To celebrate those great genre-bending efforts, here are a dozen and a half of our favorites from the last ten years (with a doff of the cap to Panic Button, a low budget Brit horror that just misses out)…
15. Devil (2010)
Shamelessly exploiting many people's paralysing fear of elevators, Devil pitches the situation of five strangers trapped inside a elevator in a high-rise tower block. Scary enough, right? Well some malevolent force soon turns up to start messing with them, too. Is there a murderer amongst them? Or is it some sort of demonic presence? One of the few good things to come from M Night Shyamalan for a few years, the movie is a surprisingly solid and entertaining thriller that asks, 'who can you trust?' Sure, we're watching stock characters speak contrivances at each other, but who said it had to be great art?
14. Vacancy (2007)
It always seems best, when creating a single-location horror, to keep your protagonist as much in the dark as possible. It certainly doesn't help his or her mental state once the shenanigans kick off, but it sure is fun to watch for the audience. Getting increasingly confused and agitated in motel thriller Vacancy is Luke Wilson's David Fox, who is compelled to check into a creepy road side motel with his wife after their car breaks down. They soon find hidden cameras in their room, and are forced to take part in a sadistic horror movie of their own.
13. Frozen (2010)
"It does for skiing what Jaws did for swimming" announces the trailer for Frozen, a low budget thriller set on a set of treacherous slopes. Stuck on a broken down ski elevator for over a week, three friends must figure a way down to safety before they either freeze to death, starve to death, or both. With chancing the sheer drop seemingly the best option, the movie remembers to add hungry wolves down below, and it's a case of choosing the lesser evil before they meet their maker anyway. Frozen is a bit of a forgotten gem, and ends up being quite grisly, as well as truly terrifying.
12. Identity (2003)
You'll have come to realise from reading this list, if not before, that motels are a great breeding ground for fear, tension and claustrophobic horror. Identity might just be the best example of motel-based horror in recent memory, following a seemingly disparate group of people driven to the hotel by a freak rain storm. As they start to bite the dust one by one, we come to realise that they might not be as disconnected as they first thought. It’s one of those thrillers that revels in its twist ending for a little too long, but whether you’re on board with it or not, it never diminishes the fun.
11. Exam (2009)
Part of the relatively new corporate horror subgenre, British movie Exam smartly plays on our fear of job interviews and formal business settings. Appealing to people who watch The Apprentice and its various off-shoots, the movie brings together a group of eager job applicants and puts them in a room together. Asked to answer a cryptic puzzle within 80 minutes, they are forbidden from leaving the room. The movie’s tension and sense of dread builds to a crisis point, and Exam is a fascinating insight into those dangerously ambitious minds we’re so fascinated by in current times.
10. Right At Your Door (2006)
Slightly different from some of the more elaborate films on this list, Right At Your Door poses a 'what would you do?' question when Los Angeles is devastated by a dirty bomb explosion. Told to stay home and seal themselves off from outside air, Brad's wife begins knocking on their door. Does he let her in and risk being exposed? Or does he keep her out, watching the consequences of those actions unfold on his own doorstep? The panic on both sides of the glass escalates, and we're asked to ponder what we'd do if the unenviable situation were our own.
9. The Killing Room (2009)
Working with the same ideas as Exam, The Killing Room flips it on its head by putting a group of homeless people in a room and testing their resolve. With corporate meddling behind the scenes, the movie turns into an intense psychological study of human nature and the ways we react when our survival depends on answering various questions. Elsewhere, a woman conducting the experiment starts to question their methods, and things unravel, fast.
8. Splinter (2008)
After motels and haunted houses, gas stations are probably the most popular venues for the subgenre. Such is the case in Splinter, which sees a young couple led there by ruthless carjackers. Soon they're trapped by some kind of infection, and people start being invaded by the mysterious entity one by one. The trouble is that there's no way of telling who's infected and who isn't from the outside, and the group already have some unresolved trust issues. The movie has a sense of fun that lifts it past other genre fare, but is also smart enough to scare us silly in the process.
7. The Mist (2007)
Of all the films to come out of Frank Darabont's love affair with Stephen King's work, The Mist must be the most unloved and unwatched of all. It's a travesty really, as the movie is a brilliant find for those who’ve gone and done some digging. In it, we focus on a gang of small-town residents who become trapped in their local grocery store when an alien-infested mist appears. Combining all the best parts of a Lord Of The Flies-style character study with a classic monster movie, it evolves into a tense and incisive two hour thrill ride with a famously down-beat ending.
6. Red Eye (2005)
You're never more trapped than when you're thousands of feet in the air, and Red Eye uses this truth to engage our claustrophobia and common fear of flying. In the movie, as Rachel McAdams' character flirts with Cillian Murphy at the airport, she has no idea he is actually involved in an elaborate murder plot. Kidnapped during the flight, her captor threatens to murder her father, and she's soon deeply involved in his plans to assassinate a prominent politician. It's more of a thriller than a horror, but uses its talented leads to great, creepy, effect.
5. Paranormal Activity (2007)
Paranormal Activity made a huge impact when it was released and it says a lot about its originality that the franchise is still going strong four films in. The first instalment bought its power with the famous static bedroom shot, used intermittently in an otherwise still housebound horror. As we watched the central couple sleep, searching each nook and cranny of their bedroom and hallway, the audience was tricked more than once into scaring themselves. The sequels may never have lived up to the novelty factor of this first movie, but we shouldn’t take the series’ simple horrors for granted.
4. Triangle (2009)
There's lots of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey stuff going on in mind-messing horror Triangle, in which a group of stranded sailors find themselves reliving a pattern of torment and violence over and over again. Realising they must break the pattern in order to survive their ordeal, they must stop themselves from crossing paths with other timelines throughout the movie. Complicated? Yes. But it's worth every minute when a modern thriller comes out as slick and entertaining as Triangle.
3. Pontypool (2008)
Zombie invasion movies are usually very 'big' films, preoccupied with violence, gore and impending doom. Pontypool, however, takes the opposite tack, and shows us the ascension of a full-scale zombie apocalypse from the confines of a Canadian radio station. As low of a budget as you can get, the movie uses such limitations to its ultimate advantage, with calls coming in from the outside and an impending realisation from within escalating the fear and panic for the audience right along with the characters trapped there.
2. Buried (2010)
The most strictly single-location movie on the list, Buried is a masterclass in how to keep an audience's attention whilst never actually going anywhere. Ryan Reynolds plays the unfortunate victim of a terrorist ransom plot, and he must survive in his makeshift coffin while negotiating his own search and rescue effort. Through a series of increasingly frantic phone calls, grisly demands, and in-coffin complications, Paul Conroy never loses our devoted attention and sympathy. It’s another one that proves how difficult it is to end with a rosy resolution, but this movie deserves all the plaudits for the terror and panic it incites from within one wooden box.
1. REC (2007)
Including its US remake, Quarantine, which - let's face it - ended up a shot-for-shot rehash anyway, REC is one of the most frightening zombie films, single-location thrillers, and found-footage horrors of all time. The masterstroke of the movie is that things are revealed to us at the same time as Angela, and the real time structure allows the terror to be amped up gradually, exploding spectacularly at the end. Of course, this tactic also means that we get minimal answers as to what was going on in the apartment block, leaving it cut short with many questions left unanswered.
Duncan Jones' Warcraft movie filming in January?
After a gestation period that has not been short, the long-mooted Warcraft movie looks like it's going to finally start shooting in January. The unconfirmed news has been broken by Production Weekly, which Tweeted that Legendary Pictures has set up offices at CMPP Studios in Vancouver. It cites a shooting start date for the feature of January 13th 2014.
As part of the split between Warner Bros and Legendary Pictures, the former had an option as to whether to distribute the Warcraft movie. It declined, and Universal was next in line. Again, while there's been no official confirmation, it would appear that the studio has agreed to pick up distribution duties.
Warcraft was, once upon a time, being developed by Sam Raimi as a project to direct. However, when he left the movie, in stepped Moon and Source Code helmer Duncan Jones. Given the strength of Duncan Jones' directorial record to date, the news of his appointment understandably went down very, very well. Not least here.
The plan remains to have the Warcraft movie in cinemas in 2015, it seems. As we hear more about it, we'll let you know...
Star Trek Into Darkness and the missing Blu-ray extras
Heading into UK stores next week, and arriving in the US a week later, is the DVD and Blu-ray release of Star Trek Into Darkness. But as US reviewers for the movie have started to receive their copies, it's looking as though Paramount has decided to hold back the bulk of the extra features from the disc release. Furthermore, it seems to be holding them back, in America at least, to provide different retailers with different exclusives.
The DVD release of Star Trek Into Darkness is apparently extras-free, whilst the Blu-ray features seven featurettes, that run to around 40 minutes. The review that's gone up over at The Digital Bits suggests that these are basic filler, the kind of press kit pieces that are interesting enough, but hardly substantive.
This in itself wouldn't be the best of news. But the issue here is that the filmmakers created a lot more in the way of extra features, yet they're not appearing on the main Blu-ray release.
Instead, they're being used as retailer exclusives. As such, the only way you can get the commentary track (on paper, arguably the pick of the extra features that we know about) that JJ Abrams and his team recorded is via an iTunes 'extra' download. From what we can make out, to get hold of it you need to pay full price for the 1080p download of the movie from Apple. So, if you want to watch the movie on Blu-ray with commentary, you have to pay twice, and press play on two devices at the same time. Which we can't imagine very many people want to do.
Furthermore, additional featurettes are only available as special downloads from CinemaNow and VuDu. And then there are additional featurettes that appear on bonus discs if you buy Star Trek Into Darkness from either Target or Best Buy in the US (although both of those stores seem to have different retailer exclusive extras).
According to the Amazon UK listing for the UK Star Trek Into Darkness release, we're only getting the main featurettes too that appear on the US disc, so what the arrangements are for the retailer exclusives over here are remains to be seen.
Understandably, this decision - to hold back extras from customers to entice retailers - has not got down well, and as Bleeding Cool switch out, "one of the qualities I appreciate in Blu-ray releases is that if I purchase a Blu-ray I then own the best release of that movie I can get, until another technology comes along. I have it in the best possible format currently available for home viewing and with all the special features that I may return to again and again in years to come. This disc isn’t that".
As it turns out, to get the full selection of extras for Star Trek Into Darkness, it looks like you're expected to buy the disc from an assorted of different retailers, and jigsaw them together. How can that be right and fair?
On the upside, the technical side of the Star Trek Into Darkness Blu-ray is reportedly very strong, and The Digital Bits has posted its review here.
We await the UK disc with interest to see if the above is reflected over here. We fear it may be.
The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Movie: Everything We Know
Disqus - noscript
This movie is going to suck mightily. Songs will be written about how bad it will be. Which sucks in itself, because I love the Turtles and want to see a good, new, live-action movie about them. All the casting aside from the Turtles(we won't know how good/bad they are until we see/hear them) sounds exactly like how SNL would do a parody of a Michael Bay directed or produced Turtle movie.
We should have heeded the Transformers fans warnings. ..
Batman vs. Superman Will Film in Detroit
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
James Spader is Ultron in Avengers 2!
"James Spader will face off against Earth’s Mightiest Heroes as the villain in Marvel’s Avengers: Age of Ultron, the sequel to 2012’s record-breaking Marvel’s The Avengers. The Emmy Award-winning actor will play Ultron in the Avengers’ much anticipated return to the big screen from writer/director Joss Whedon. The film comes to theaters on May 1, 2015.
Spader earned three Emmy Awards for his role as Alan Shore on Boston Legal and The Practice, and will return to television this fall in NBC’s highly anticipated series The Blacklist. Most recently Spader was seen in the critically-acclaimed film Lincoln directed by Steven Spielberg and has previously worked with a long list of accomplished film directors including David Cronenberg, Curtis Hansen, Sidney Lumet, Mike Nichols, Tim Robbins, Robert Rodriguez, Steven Soderbergh, and Oliver Stone. David Mamet also directed Spader in the Broadway play Race.
Avengers: Age of Ultron will bring the Marvel Universe’s biggest heroes together again to face one of their biggest villains, with Marvel’s The Avengers director Joss Whedon returning to write and direct the sequel. Marvel’s The Avengers was released in 2012 and went on to earn $1.5 billion worldwide, making it the third-largest grossing movie of all time.
Spader is represented by ICM Partners and his lawyer Melanie Cook at Ziffren Brittenham."
While certainly a momentous announcement, this isn't likely to generate the same kind of controversy that Warner Bros.' recent casting of Ben Affleck as Batman did. As of now, there's been no word as to whether Spader will wear a motion-capture suit or just provide Ultron's voice. There's sure to be more on this in coming days, though, so stay with us!
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
James Brown Biopic Titled and Dated
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Rooney Mara to Replace Mia Wasikowska in Carol
Louis Leterrier Returns for Now You See Me Encore
Getaway, Review
Zack Snyder defends the mass destruction of Man Of Steel
There isn't really anything spoiler-y here, but if you've not seen Man Of Steel, you may still prefer to err on the side of caution and give this story a miss.
With over $600m in the bank, Zack Snyder's reboot of the Superman franchise, Man Of Steel, got things back up and running for Warner Bros where that particular franchise is concerned. And, as you more than likely know, the next chapter in Superman's big screen adventures will be the 2015 valet/Superman movie, starring Henry Cavill and Ben Affleck.
Man Of Steel was a bit of a divisive movie, all considered, but one thing most agree on was that the wholesale destruction of the last half hour was borderline extreme. With a body count that would have comfortably run into the tens of thousands at least (hundreds of thousands, even), and the city of Metropolis more rubble than standing it seemed, 'carnage' would seem an appropriate word.
Snyder, though, has been defending that aspect of his movie in particular. "I wanted the movie to have a mythological feeling. In ancient mythology, mass deaths are used to symbolize disasters. In other countries like Greece and Japan, myths were recounted through the generations, partly to answer unanswerable questions about death and violence. In America, we don’t have that legacy of ancient mythology. Superman is probably the closest we get. It’s a way of recounting the myth".
Snyder was chatting to The Japan Times, and in the interview, he also talked about how he was telling a story of immigration with his Superman movie. You can read it in full here.
Snyder is currently working on the story for the valet/Superman movie with David S Goyer. Snyder will then direct, and Goyer will pen the screenplay. The movie is due in cinemas in summer 2015.
Disqus - noscript
The more Snyder opens his mouth the more ignorant he seems. It's a shame that Batman has now been put in the hands of someone who defends senseless, out of place violence in such a simpleton manner. The entire second half of Superman was so over the top it became incredibly tiresome. His best work, to me, still is Dawn of the Dead -- the only film where he didn't have a huge budget so he had to rely on story.
I agree fully on Dawn of the Dead - love that movie so much - and partially agree on Superman. I don't think the entire second half is problematic but i described the climax as an example of ten minutes worth of excess making a great movie seem merely okay.
I hope that Zack Snyder get fired from the project and get replaced by Ben Affleck to direct the movie.
In 1978 I believed a man could fly. In 2013, I believed a man could mope in the most joyless manner and break people's necks.
I thought the damage portrayal was really good. Many people missed the point that Zod and his small army was a very destructive force. He was hell bent on destroying the human population. It allows for the government to be wary of Superman, and Lex Luthor can capitalize on new armaments to help defend against alien invaders since the world now knows it is not alone in the universe.
When titans fight, there is likely to be carnage. There's really no getting around that. You can try to sugarcoat it but then you end up with violence without consequences. That's hardly any better.
Dracula To Rise Again at Universal, Yet Release Date Buried Further
Dracula is rising from the grave at Universal, the home of monsters as far as I’m concerned. Thomas Tull (no relation to Jethro Tull, the band or the farmer), who produced Godzilla and Pacific Rim, is taking the stake out of the heart of the long-dead count and bringing him back to life. Tull wants his first high-profile project at Legendary Entertainment to be Dracula for Universal Pictures. Dracula will be directed by Gary Shore. Luke Evans will put on the cape and the fangs. Dracula is already in production and should come out on Aug. 8, 2014. Legendary is talking with Universal Pictures suits right now.
Legendary has a five year co-financing deal with Universal. Tull’s team wants to do the fourth installment of Universal’s planned Jurassic Park reboot franchise. Jurassic Park 4 should begin production next year. Legendary Entertainment committed itself to spend about $275 million a year on Universal films for the first two years of the deal. Legendary will put up about $350 million a year for the three years after that. No one at Universal or Legendary are really talking, because they are sworn to secrecy about money matters.
Legendary can pick from a number of Universal monster movies like Van Helsing and the upcoming sequel to the Mummy. Legendary will decide about the Jurassic Park sequel after they see the script. Steven Spielberg is not on board for the next Jurassic Park movie because he costs too much.
Tull recently brought his money to Universal after a longtime deal with Warner Bros. saw releases of such films as Christopher Nolan’s Batman trilogy. Warner and Legendary suits battled epically over Man of Steel. Legendary already brought Seventh Son from Warner Bros. to Universal.
***UPDATE*** Following on the heels of Legendary Pictures and Thomas Tull joining the already deep-into-production vampire flick, Universal Pictures has announced thatDracula: Year Zero wil be pushed back from its original release date. Initially slated for an August 8, 2014 release, right around the time of Marvel Studios' latest gamble, Universal now plans to release the origin story of Vlad Tepes on October 3, 2014. More on this story as it develops...
SOURCE: VARIETY
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.
12 Years A Slave to Have Its Premiere at the New York Film Festival
First Photo of Arnold Schwarzenegger and Harrison Ford in Expendables 3
Many may be gearing up for a nice relaxing Labor Day Weekend, but on The Expendables 3 set, they are gearing up for many legends uniting, if however briefly. On former California Governor and current actor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Instagram page, the actor shot out an image of himself with the legendary Harrison Ford, as well as director Patrick Hughes
Kurt Russell in Fast & Furious 7?
Alexandre Desplat to Score Godzilla Reboot
Passion, Review
Bradley Cooper Is Rocket Raccoon with First Official Pic
Rocket Raccoon has finally found his voice!Academy Award-nominated actor Bradley Cooper has officially joined the cast of Marvel's "Guardians of the Galaxy," lending his voice to the fan-favorite raccoon that will join Peter Quill (Chris Pratt), Gamora (Zoe Saldana) and Drax (Dave Bautista) on their epic adventure.Cooper has previously starred in "Silver Linings Playbook," for which he was nominated for an Oscar®, "Limitless,""Place Beyond the Pines" and the "Hangover" trilogy, the latter of which has grossed $1.4 billion globally. He will next be seen in "American Hustle" which will reunite him with "Silver Linings Playbook" director David O. Russell. "Guardians of the Galaxy" will mark Cooper's first voiceover work.
This news follows on the heels of Cooper joining Warner Brothers and Jay Roach’s Lance Armstrong cautionary tale, where he may or may not play the disgraced cyclist.
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Disqus - noscript
Saw it in the theater. Why would I want to watch this disappointing, unimaginative, predictable mess, again?
I'm sorry, but this movie was horrible. Also, somehow, it completely forgot that Star Trek is all about the characters - not random, over the top, nonsensical, forced set pieces. Also, as a side note, models are better than digital.
Horrible movie that underperformed at the box office. Then to compound their mistakes, the studio decides on a money grab that is epic even by Hollywood standards. Not going to buy any of the Blu-rays. Even though I hated the movie..it was still a Star Trek movie and I was going to buy the Blu-Ray. No longer.