Quantcast
Channel: Movies – Den of Geek
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live

YEAH! Now Available on the iPad

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/19/2013 at 4:01PM

Attention all film geeks, AMC Network's streaming service has released its YEAH app. Oh, and Michael Rooker approves.

We’ve written about the YEAH! experience before. Now, the streaming movie service is coming to the iPad. AMC Networks has released an app available through the iTunes store that allows for a highly interactive movie viewing.

For those new to YEAH!, the service allows users to not just merely re-watch their favorite classic movies, but also go beyond the screen with trivia, polls and commentary from the creators and stars.

YEAH!’s newest promo video includes the stamp of approval from The Walking Dead’s Michael Rooker. 

“Given AMC's commitment on-air and online to curating the best movies of all time, YEAH!’s streaming movies and curated content are a natural next step,” AMC President Charlie Collier said in a press release. “YEAH! is the latest in AMC's commitment to providing audiences with high-quality, ground-breaking programming experiences.” 

You can check out what YEAH! has to offer here.  

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


New Trailer Introduces The Cast of Grand Budapest Hotel

$
0
0
TrailerTony Sokol12/19/2013 at 4:09PM

Tell no one. That will explain everything.

The incidents that follow were described to me exactly as I present them here. Well, not exactly, I have a tendency to elaborate, so I’ll just say there’s a new Wes Anderson movie coming out. The trailer looks like a pretty wild ride and I was very excited to see Ed Norton. He is just so consistently great that even with a cast as good as this one, and it is, it’s got Bill Murray, Willem Dafoe, a shaved and heavily tattooed Harvey Keitel, Bill Murray and F. Murray Abraham, he’s got me giggling.

There’s something missing from The Grand Budapest Hotel, I don’t know what it contains, I don’t know what represents, I don’t know what it is, but it permeates everything. The concierge of the hotel, played by Ralph Fiennes and the bellboy, played by Tony Revolori,  shows us what is looking like a crime, a theft, a violent event that goes back ages and takes some finding out. The police, the convicts, everyone from the upper class to the sniveling little runt called Pinky, are looking for that missing something.

The Grand Budapest Hotel isAnderson's eighth feature film and also stars F. Mathieu Amalric, Saoirse Ronan, Adrien Brody, Lea Seydoux, Jeff Goldblum, Jason Schwartzman, Jude Law, Tilda Swinton, Tom Wilkinson and Owen Wilson. It also looks like everyone had to grow a mustache for the movie. Except, of course, for Tilda Swinton and Harvey Keitel.

Wes Anderson's Grand Budapest Hotelis avoiding the Oscar crunch by waiting until it’s over. It comes out March 7, 2014.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

 

Quentin Tarantino on his potential future projects

$
0
0
NewsGlen Chapman12/20/2013 at 7:06AM

Quentin Tarantino has been chatting about what fans can expect from him next and if he's really stopping at ten films...

Quentin Tarantino teased a while back that he would stop directing when he reached ten films, which would leave him with two films left if he's sticking to that assertion. But in a recent interview, he's now gone on to say that perhaps he was a bit hasty. “Okay, it would sound really cool because it's a round number and it would make sense as I would have made three movies per decade", he told The Independent. "But it's not fixed in time. I still have some more things to do before being done with movies".

Tarantino has never been a director short of ideas so he'll no doubt have enough in the tank to go well beyond ten should he choose to. There's the long rumoured Kill Bill 3 for a start, although he's been cooling on that project for some time, now adding that "I don't think about Kill Bill 3 that much".

It was thought at one stage that he would follow up Django Unchained with Killer Crow, which would be a concluding instalment of his unofficial rewritten history trilogy, but recently it was rumoured that he would tackle another western. Tarantino was non-committal on the subject stating that it could be either or "a horror movie, perhaps".

A Tarantino horror? Now that could be fun...

The Independent

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing! 

Disqus - noscript

Tarantino said on a recent appearance on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno when he took a hardcover copy of the DC Comics/Vertigo comic adaptation of Django Unchained that he's got another western in him and said straight from his mouth that his next film would be a western and it's not a Django Unchained sequel.
As for the other ideas, I'm down for ANYTHING TARANTINO. Western, horror, WWII, whatever. I'm in! Love his films!
Here's the link to a YouTube video of his recent Leno appearance that went down around Thanksgiving.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

Why Jennifer Lawrence is Good for America

$
0
0
FeatureDavid Crow12/20/2013 at 7:31AM

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire and American Hustle star ignores many of the less appealing aspects of celebrity culture...

Last month, I was perusing the Internet, as one does when they should be working, when I came upon a site with a fascinating juxtaposition. In the top article was a song review for Miley Cyrus’ latest single, which was critiqued with sickening sycophancy by praising the former Disney star’s inspiration of a “craze” that involves reverse cowgirl-ing statues in public locations (you may recall this stemming from the video where she performed fellatio on a hammer). The other was a simple news blurb about Jennifer Lawrence in The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, a movie where the young woman is a heroine who never once throws herself off a cliff because her boyfriend dumped her or waits for the man to save the day (also with nary a Beetlejuice’d Robin Thicke in sight). It then dawned on me: Jennifer Lawrence IS GOOD for America.
 
 
The 23-year-old actress has many of the assets required to be a celebrity, which our culture often mistakes for being either talented or a role model. She’s famous, she’s the star of a popular film franchise, and she’s a blonde bombshell (most of the time). But beyond all of that, she is actually talented while playing roles that do not require her to either pout or undress. And even if some do, the Oscar winning thesp seems to take it in stride.
 
 
I first became aware of Lawrence, like so many others, from a small indie called Winter’s Bone. In that permafrost film, Lawrence shined bright at 19-years-old on a screen shared with character actor heavyweights like John Hawkes, Garret Dillahunt and Dale Dickey. While I did not love the film—the story of a teenage girl who must find her probably dead meth-dealing father in the Ozark Mountains drug ring or else her younger siblings will starve—the performances were uniformly excellent, earning Lawrence a deserved Oscar nomination for Best Actress. She lost that year to Natalie Portman’s tour de force in Black Swan, but nobody doubted Lawrence would be back in the Kodak Theatre (now Dolby Theatre) and soon. Becoming a movie star was expected for someone with that much charisma at only 19. What was less predictable is that she could become an alternative to decades of Hollywood wisdom.

 
 
This is not to turn her work into an entire puff piece on The Hunger Games. But still, it is refreshing to see a popular actress in a role who actually fits all the buzzy PR words used to sell “girl power” in pop culture. You know exactly what I am referring to. If one says the phrases “empowering,” “strong,” “fierce,” or “independent” in any ensuing combination, it is often treated as an excuse for the feminine to be objectified any which way till VMA. The contradiction first became hilariously crystallized to me when I was yet still a wee lad and Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore, and Lucy Liu all sat on the late night chat circuit to call their film version of Charlie’s Angels a story of feminist empowerment and gender progression when all eighth grade boys wanted to see were the bouncing curves in a film that was marketed around Ms. Diaz saying to her mailman, “So, you can just feel free to stick it in my slot.”
 
 
This realization is not necessarily revolutionary, because it is so ubiquitous. It is our common sense. Consider when Machete Kills came out earlier this year, it was sold entirely on a slew of actresses wearing gun belts and not much else, but they all found the project so empowering. Obviously, these images are heavily skewed toward adolescent boys—with focus group-approved “fierce” marketing aimed at young girls arbitrarily thrown in—and there is the entire argument that American values are still rooted in some form of repressive Puritanism that needs to be torn down. Nonetheless, if such squeaky-clean repression, attempting to have “the best of both worlds,” leads to fawning over the trailblazing gusto of a mightily abused foam finger, there is something rotten in the state of pop culture.
 
 
That might be a generalization, but it is one that can be comfortably made when navel-gazing has become the centerfold of nearly all in it. Once upon a time, media would at least try to pass morality and “good vs. evil” allegories to younger demographics through animation and other assorted outlets. Consider that the most popular images sold to girls now are less about the magic wand than the jewel encrusted microphone. When pop celebrity is seen as its own kind of royalty, there is little surprise when its products simply graduate into Spring Breakers.
 
 
Yet ultimately, sexuality is not the issue; but the cynically banal use of it could be. And that goes for the flipside as well. Increasingly, Hollywood is shifting more and more to wild swings between massive franchisable blockbusters and “micro-budget” schlock. Paramount Pictures executives have supposedly said that they’re most interested in Transformers or Paranormal Activity movies these days. Ironically, this is appearing to actually somewhat hurt the traditional Hollywood “woman’s picture,” going all the way back to the 1930s: The romantic comedy. Increasingly, a middle-budgeted star vehicle like that is seen as risky because it does not have the guaranteed easy rewards of a $2 million genre flick or the massive success of a money-printing tentpole that hits. As the market changes, studios have tried to find the latter for a female-targeted demographic.
 
 
When Twilight made nearly $400 million worldwide in 2008, Hollywood took notice of what became perceived as the new Harry Potter. When its sequel, The Twilight Saga: New Moon, opened to $142 million in the U.S. box office and earned over $700 million worldwide, putting it domestically on par with Harry Potter and above the latest Star Trek and X-Men offerings of that year, accepted Tinsletown wisdom did a 180. Prior to those films, the general notion was that women did not go out to the theater in big enough waves to see a big budget franchise film or genre fare, unless that franchise was Sex and the City. Suddenly, it became accepted by studios that teen girls, and their more quietly riveted mothers, would flock to a genre movie as long as it was romantic or featured romantic supernatural trappings.

 
 
I am not going to get into the many, many, many imitators that Twilight has had in the short four years following that massive sequel debut. Suffice to say that studios have chased Edward Cullen’s sparkles, thus far to middling results. But Twilight is pivotal because it offered the other side of the false choice: The Bella Swan. As created, somewhat brilliantly by Stephenie Meyer, Bella the character (NOTE: Not Kristen Stewart) is an amalgamation of every negative cliché imaginable. She spends four books (and five movies) waiting for her “prince” to come and save her. She then also courts another boy for much of the series, despite even being engaged and eventually married to the other, essentially playing them off one another. There is not a single conflict that she solves in the story for herself, as personified most glaringly in one of the sequels where her two suitors join forces to carry poor, helpless Bella away from a threat. Literally. She can’t even stand on her own two feet without them.

Worst of all, Bella reinforces the 1950s mindset that if a woman does not have a man in her life, then that life is not worth living. After all, once her boyfriend dumps her in the aforementioned box office smash, Bella spends most of the movie partying with a biker gang, intentionally crashing moving vehicles and jumping off a rock face, all to get her ex’s attention—which she does, making hurting herself worthwhile. In more satirical hands, Bella could have been a Shakespearian villain in the way she endangered all those around her in pursuit of her own selfish desires (thanks to Doug Walker for that comparison). But as is, she is merely the ultimate concoction of negative stereotypes involving self-hate and loathing, sent glitteringly to her millions of tween fans.
 
 
Which brings us back to Jennifer Lawrence. In all likelihood, The Hunger Games would never have been greenlit if not for the overwhelming success of Twilight. But to Lionsgate’s credit, and even more to the young readers who made Suzanne Collins’ trilogy a literary success, it was a young adult series that actually cultivated an ACTION heroine whose love triangle was genuinely secondary to her own growth, not to mention the post-apocalyptic world it paints full of more than a little allegory in response to the Bush and Jersey Shore years. Ultimately though, bringing in an actor’s director like Gary Ross (Pleasantville, Seabiscuit) provided an opportunity to place emphasis on higher talent than the rest of the current crop of YA adaptations.
 
 
Casting Lawrence in The Hunger Games was considered a risk for a number of reasons, besides her relative anonymity. Despite being a critical darling for Winter’s Bone, she followed that up with the box office flop The Beaver—a strangely sweet film from director Jodie Foster that was torpedoed by her friend Mel Gibson, who self-sabotaged yet another comeback for himself—and X-Men: First Class. While she was well cast as a bubbly and memorable version of Mystique, the blue paint hid some of her range in a movie more focused on the bromance between James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender (reportedly, now a star, she will have a much bigger role in the sequel). The other factor, besides fans and even some critics bizarrely whining about her weightwhich gave Hollywood pause, is that her character of Katniss is an action heroine. An action heroine who does not wear skintight leather or feature a variety of costume changes. This simply isn’t done.

 
 
Of course, The Hunger Games turned into the Cinderella story of 2012 when it opened to $152 million (the highest non-sequel that year). It then also went on to earn over $400 million in the U.S. box office alone, better than any Marvel Studios film yet released at that point. It was a tremendous success that catapulted Lawrence to stardom, but what is more remarkable is WHY it was a success and why it could be a culturally good omen.
 
 
The premise itself was a rejection of the notion that women should be docile and passive to the overarching narrative of a story, even if it is their own. However, what makes Lawrence’s Katniss stick out is that Ross’ much maligned, but remarkably effective, style of gritty, handheld camera work evoked a potent verisimilitude for the story. The Kentucky born, Louisville girl was given a lived-in world where even if she did not look like she was starving, she did appear to come from a land where a warm leather jacket would be more important for her survival than a perfectly form-fitting tank top.

The general rule is that female moviegoers do not like action, and this is why there are no female superheroes with their own movies during this currently exploding genre craze. Indeed, the last ones adapted—Catwoman, Elektra, and Lara Croft—all ramped up the sex appeal of these already well-utilized objects of male gaze. Catwoman went from a leather cat suit to Halle Berry a dominatrix outfit, and Croft’s shorts inconceivably got even shorter. There have been more fully realized superheroines as of late. Last year, Anne Hathaway’s Catwoman walked away with the whole Dark Knight Trilogy closer for many viewers, including President Barack Obama. And Joss Whedon and Scarlett Johansson did convince a doubting public that Black Widow deserved to be in a group that also includes a Norse god and a not-so-jolly green giant. But neither is the star, and both have to do their fighting in high heels.
 
 
The only time Katniss is “prettied” under obvious layers of make-up and sparkling dresses is done for satirical purposes of mocking a culture who’s obsession with reality television romances mirrors our own. She never once looks comfortable in the situation. Obviously, Lawrence is still stunning and meant to be a movie star in a star-making role, but for once she is treated as a heroine first with all objectification being pushed to the background.
 
 
These elements coupled with the actress’ very natural and low-key performance created a protagonist that men AND women of all ages could root for in a movie that hits more demographics than Thor or Man of Steel. As it turns out, neither gender minds that she wasn’t rocking pumps or that she was shown as capable of killing several men throughout the narrative. And these actions, done to save a sister, are all heavily emphasized above the requisite love triangle. Many of these choices were from Collins’ own text, as well as the well-cast spotlight by Ross. Yet, Ross’ greatest coup was casting a real talent who only needed the right vehicle, because Lawrence has proven to handle the PR machine with as deft a hand as Katniss Everdeen.

 
 
It would be presumptuous to suggest that audiences know the real Jennifer Lawrence. But the personality she has chosen to project is one of replenishing common sense in a pop arena of dizzying hype. She openly mocked industry norms when she said, “In Hollywood, I’m obese. I’m considered a fat actress.” This openly challenges the standards of the modern fashion industry and reverses the media feeding frenzy’s rifle scope from herself to the pages of Vogue, Vanity Fair and even the industry professional’s Hollywood Reporter. The move, as calculated as Katniss’ “fire dress,” was well timed, similar to her instant ability to turn dumb questions about her tripping at an awards ceremony into the story, as opposed to her tripping. Whether these nuggets are truly indicative of her personality matter little as compared to the image it cleverly projects to a pop culture landscape littered with hipster apathy or fashion week cynicism.
 
 
But ultimately, the most important thing is that she is proving herself to be a great talent for whom the work matters more than this international hype machine that is raising her up as the next golden livestock. Granted, there are a number of terrific actresses and movie stars who are likewise professionally minded and in demand at the moment, but none have become an “American sweetheart” at the center of the zeitgeist. When Jennifer Lawrence won her first Oscar for Silver Linings Playbook at 22, the only surprise was the realization that while the movie is terrific, and she is good in it, that this will not be one of her best performances. She was excellent in Silver Linings, which I ranked in the Top 10 Movies of 2012, but it was in reality a supporting part in a superb romantic dramedy (a sadly dying breed). The actress from Winter’s Bone can do more, and because of her Hunger Games spotlight, she can prove that to a pop media free-for-all that otherwise would be only focus on mediocre celebrities who’s claim to fame are what inanimate object they will put in their mouth next (SPOILER ALERT: This week’s it’s a joint).
 
 
So, yes, Jennifer Lawrence is good for America. In a culture that will literally reward young women today if they make the right kind of sex tape, there is now a rising star of equal popularity built on playing a character—both in front and behind the camera—who is more memorable for her talent, skill and supremely capable gamesmanship over fleeting shock value. When even child-oriented culture now favors vacuous celebrity over fairy tales, at least this is one celebrity having a moment worth watching.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

Except for the fact that her character in Hunger Games is a "role model" who kills people.

She's FORCED to kill people by a distopian government, who by forcing a lot children to kill each other every year enforces their rule. Lawrence character only volunteers to the competition to save her little sister. So there is a difference.

Sorry.

I feel you supported your argument quite well indeed! I am inclined to agree that she's refreshingly good for America! Cheers.

Steven E. de Souza Talks Commando 2, Sgt. Rock, the Flash Gordon Movie You May Never See, and Much More!

$
0
0
InterviewMike Cecchini12/20/2013 at 8:10AM

One of the greatest action film writers of all time gives us insight on his career, and some stuff we never got to see!

If you grew up in the '80s and '90s and you were a fan of action films, there’s a good chance that you can recite lines of Steven E. de Souza’s dialogue by heart. While Mr. de Souza was immortalized by the work he did on classics like Die HardThe Running Man, and Commando, he also brought a number of smaller genre projects to the screen. But there are Steven E. de Souza projects you may not be aware of, and franchises he worked on that never got off the ground. Mr. de Souza was kind enough to give us some time to not only touch on some of his biggest hits, but talk about some of his lesser-known sci-fi and superhero projects as well! Read on for info about cult films like The Return of Captain Invincible and Hudson Hawk, and also the real story behind movies that almost got made, like Commando 2, Sgt. Rock, and Flash Gordon!

Den of Geek: Aside from your considerable action movie catalogue, at one point it felt like you were the “go-to guy” for superheroes (even at a time when not that many of them were getting made) and other adaptations. How did that come about?

Steven E. de Souza: When I first came to Hollywood from Philadelphia, where I had been working in local television, I knew that in order to get into motion pictures or television you had to have a spec script. I wrote the two kinds of things that kept me in high school an extra year. I always had either a Robert Heinlein or a Raymond Chandler behind my algebra book, so I wrote a detective piece and I wrote a science fiction piece, two feature-length things.

I met a producer who directed me to an agent, so I got stuff to an agent on like, a Tuesday, and by Thursday there was a package of my scripts at my aunt’s house that I had dropped off at the agent, with a note that said, “Sorry, too busy to read these right now.” I complained to my Aunt who told me, “Y’know, my best friend is (game show mogul) Merv Griffin’s secretary. Maybe they can do something for you there.” I went over to have lunch with her friend and she said, “They don’t really have any writers for the game shows, so I don’t really think I can do anything for you here. But Merv had a lawyer who I heard became an agent, so I should have his phone number around here somewhere.” When I got to this guy's office, he was literally moving into his desk. It was his first day.

He told me, “Listen, I love these scripts. Will you work in television?” And I said, “What do you mean? Of course I would!” And he said “Alright, because some people only want to work in features. I gave your scripts to another client of mine.” And I said, “Oh, that’s great, I could use some more professional advice.” And he said, “No, you don’t understand. My other clients are producers. One guy is on the Six Million Dollar Man and they have a real hard time finding people who can write it, because the people who are good at science fiction are clueless about how you write police procedurals.”

The thing is, these guys would say “he uses his powers to know who the killer is, and then he goes and gets him.” But no, he still has to go get a warrant because the show is more realistic. But then the people who could write police shows couldn’t get their heads around the elements that are more science fiction or fantasy. So they would introduce like, a magic ring or something, or make him fly. They’d say, “But he needs to fly for my episode!” And the producers would be like “No, you can’t just add a power for one episode, because there’s continuity.”

“So,” he told me, “with these two scripts I think you can handle it, because you’re the two halves of the equation since you have a police script and a science fiction script. I took the liberty of giving your scripts to these people, could you go see them tomorrow?” I had this pitch about how having superpowers was a problem. Everybody else would go in and say “Oh, he fights a dinosaur with his bare hands" or something. So I went in and gave all the examples of how these things are a problem. Like, he’s trailing a bad guy, and he gets in an elevator like an innocent person, but he’s so heavy that they realize that something is wrong. Or he’s trying to catch a bad guy at the airport and he sets off the alarms because he’s part metal. 

The first thing they had me do was take my science fiction script and turn it into a two-part Six Million Dollar Man script, which was the famous “Death Probe” episode. That was written as a spec script and the Six Million Dollar Man wasn’t the hero. In my script, the Death Probe was vivisecting and Freddy Kruegering everybody, so that wasn’t gonna work on TV. And then it couldn’t be an American space probe, because that would never malfunction, so that had to go out the window and it became a Russian space probe. These are the compromises we make our first two weeks in Hollywood!

After that they assigned me to do a show called Gemini Man, which was an attempt to do a high-tech Invisible Man show. The Gemini Man was a guy who, after being exposed to radiation that rendered him completely invisible was now dying. They managed to stabilize his molecules with this thing that looked like a watch. As long as he had that watch on and it was charged, he would be visible. But if he turned that watch off, he would be invisible and he could die. It was a very complicated thing. The thing is, the same people, the previous year, had done a classic Invisible Man in modern times as a spy. The problem was that every time he took off his rubber Mission Impossible mask and his clothes, he was naked. And they said, “This isn’t working,” so they came up with this idea. I got assigned to that as a story editor, and after eight weeks it was canceled.

I ended up doing all the “bionic shows.” I had done The Six Million Dollar ManThe Bionic Woman, and then I was on this werewolf show called Lucan, and then what happened was, I got an opportunity to work on a lawyer show at Universal and that sort of got me out of the ghetto of the 8 o’clock science fiction show, which wasn’t given much respect back then. I didn’t really go back to sci-fi until Knight Rider. After I had finished up Knight Rider, Paramount brought me over from Universal to be a writer/producer and the first thing I did was a few pilots, and they both sold. One was a TV version of Foul Play, which was like a boy/girl detective show that was canceled quickly. The other was The Powers of Matthew Star which was kind of like Smallville before Smallville. Since then I’ve been going back and forth between science fiction/comic book stuff and action/adventure.

Did that TV superhero experience transfer to the movies naturally?

Funny enough, the first screenplay I ever wrote in Hollywood was a cult film called The Return of Captain Invincible, and the producer was Lauren Shuler (who later became Lauren Shuler-Donner, who went on to great success as producer on the X-Men franchise). She was gonna produce it and because she read or saw one of my lawyer shows, which was about real human emotion and drama, but since I had also done shows like Six Million Dollar Man, she decided “You’re the guy to write this.” When it fell behind schedule, they took it and made it like an Australian tax shelter. So the next thing I knew it was an Australian picture, and they added Australian material to kind of explain why he was in Australia.

While we’re on Captain Invincible, was that always intended to be a musical?

No, at the time when I was writing it nobody thought it was gonna be a musical. I think when they made the switch to do it in Australia that’s when the musical idea came in. I think it’s great, though!

Those songs are a riot! I mean, you've got Christopher Lee singing to Alan Arkin...

The songs are the best! They got the guys who did Rocky Horror Picture Show. So Return of Captain InvincibleThe Spirit, and Hudson Hawk became my three cult movies and they’re the antidote for people who tell me that I just do cops and robbers. I tell ‘em, “Yeah? Well what about these?”

Captain Invincible came after your work on 48 Hrs., right?

What happened with 48 Hrs. was, I was working on a TV show called The Renegades which was was Patrick Swayze’s first job, and this script was written under a brutal time crunch. The executive producer was Aaron Spelling who had a deal in place with ABC for a couple of pilots a year, and the pilot was written by one of the guys already working for him on something else, and it was rushed, and when the script came in they said “We can’t show this to them.”

They called me up and said “we want you to take a look at this script, and we need you to write a scene involving these characters and we need it by lunchtime.” So I wrote a scene about drug dealing or whatever and brought it over, and they were already casting it. Before anyone had even read the script they had already sent out a casting breakdown, and actors were coming and they couldn’t give them a script until I showed up! They shot it the next day on the lot behind one of the soundstages where there’s a lot of crap and it looks like an alley. They brought that to the network to say “Look, here’s a daily, we started on time! But we need to shut down for a week to improve the script.” They never knew that it was pulled out of our ass.

So now I had to write the script out of order, which I was already used to doing. I never have writer’s block. I may not know how to get from one scene to another right away, but I can still have other scenes written and jump around. Not that I usually write romantic comedies, but I might not be able to show you how the couple first meets, but I could show you their first date or the first time they fucked or whatever. Larry Gordon (executive producer on The Renegades, and later on 48 Hrs. and Die Hard) said, “OK, you can write whatever you want, but some of it has to be in Chinatown.” Because they already had a Chinatown set built based on the old script. So the actors are coming up to me and asking “Why do I hate this guy?” And we’re saying, “uh...you’ll find out before we finish shooting!”

48 Hrs. was also gonna have to go at the very last moment, too. The grizzled cop was originally going to be Robert Mitchum, and the crazy, wild cop was going to be young, hot action star...Clint Eastwood. Seven or eight years passed and they tried to put it together with Clint Eastwood and Richard Pryor, with Clint Eastwood now as the older cop, but that never happened. Then they said “we’ll get Eddie Murphy right off of Saturday Night Live.” They gave me the script to read and said “We need to make this funny and we need to punch up the action.” I came back 48 hours (!) later with a bunch of changes about plot points and jokes and stunts and things like that, and I had a meeting with Larry Gordon and Joel Silver and they took me over to Katzenberg and Eisner and they said “We love your ideas, now we want you to meet the director.”

When I met Walter Hill for the first time he seemed really annoyed in the meeting, and I was so naive at that point, that I didn’t realize that he was annoyed that the studio was bringing in someone to rewrite him, since he had already rewritten Roger Spottiswoode’s draft (who had also directed The Renegades). Finally he said, “Tell me something you’ve done that I’ve seen.” And Jeffrey Katzenberg said, “Oh, well Steven is one of our hottest television writers.” And Walter said, “Television? You’re having a fucking television writer rewrite me?” As he got up to leave, Katzenberg said, “Walter, wait...read what this guy does, he’s really talented. I know you want this to be dark and grim, but there’s no reason this can’t be a mix of crime and comedy like, ummmm…” and he pointed at a poster of, of all things, Stir Crazy where Richard Pryor is wearing a chicken suit. He probably could have found a better example.

I always had a lot of good experience in television meeting the actors and getting a feel for their voices. So, when Nick (Nolte) came in, he looked like a younger version of his mugshot from when he got arrested. He said, “Yeah, I’ll get in shape, the studio said they’re gonna get me a trainer and I’m gonna lose this gut.” Meanwhile, Eddie Murphy was so new at this that he showed up in a suit and tie to meet the writer! Clearly, he didn’t realize where in the pecking order the writer is in Hollywood. At the production meeting, they brought up the idea of getting a trainer for Nick, and I said, “No, let’s go with that! Make the guy who’s neat and sharp and charming and presentable the criminal, but the cop is a slob!” So there’s that running gag in the movie where they see these guys with handcuffs and they think Eddie Murphy is the cop. That whole dynamic came out of their natural demeanor.

That’s amazing!

There’s more! While I was rewriting the script and turning in pages every day, Joel Silver called me and said “I want you to come over to Katzenberg’s office. Don’t tell anyone you’re coming.” I got there, and there were script pages on the table. They said, “These are your pages from the print shop, and here’s last week’s work. Would you look at it?” So after a couple of pages I said, “Wait, something’s wrong...it’s all changed. It’s almost like it’s back the way it was!” They said, “Just like we thought. Alright, from now on, you do not let that messenger come by your office to pick up the pages. You walk the pages right over to Joel.” What Walter was doing was, he was intercepting my pages (remember, this is before email) and figuring that it was his right, as director of the movie, to change things, which is often the case, contractually, but given the studio's reaction, apparently not this time. And his “small changes” were to shred everything that I was doing, and they had hired me to rewrite him. So right now, wherever Walter Hill is, he’s complaining about how I hurt his movie by sabotaging his sabotage of my pages. 

It seems you had the last laugh…

It was good for everybody at the end of the day. It must have been good for Walter, because that movie Walter did a couple of years ago, Undefeated, it said on the posters “From the director of 48 Hrs.” so if that’s still going up 30 years later on a movie poster he must be proud of it, finally.

I still get brought on to fix screenplays that I had nothing to do with. When a movie is about to be shot and they hire me to come in and fix the script and punch it up at the last minute. In addition, I’m like a patient resuscitator who they can hire secretly after a movie has had a horrible test to rewrite some scenes and re-cut the movie so they can make it good enough to get to home video. That’s my secret identity.

I have to ask...some of us really love Hudson Hawk. There’s a lot of writers credited on there, was that one of those situations?

No, I actually started that screenplay from scratch. Bruce (Willis) had this story idea about a cat-burglar and at one point he developed a script that was a pretty reality-based, Cold War piece that was completely abandoned. Bruce wanted me to pick up the ball because we had already done the first two Die Hard movies together, and he obviously liked how they turned out. When Hudson Hawk started, (Hudson Hawkdirector) Michael Lehmann and Bruce wanted to make it crazier. I had already done two drafts and a polish at that point, when I was hired elsewhere and they wanted to make it much crazier, so Dan Waters, who had done Heathers with Michael Lehmann came in for several passes. Then the studio brought me back because they decided that it had gotten too crazy! So they flew me to Italy to sort of “un-crazy” it. Very little progress in un-crazying it was made, but it wasn’t really a gang-bang, it was mostly just me and Dan.

That wasn’t a snarky question, by the way. A lot of our staff, we genuinely love that movie!

The biggest problem with Hudson Hawk, and the people who made it even acknowledge it to this day, is that they made the one mistake that even Disney doesn’t do. Disney will have a movie like Aladdin, and it will have all kinds of craziness and silliness and goofiness and talking animals and whatever the fuck you want, but the villain is always dead serious. When you look at a Disney movie, the villain is always played straight. The mistake they made in Hudson Hawk, in pursuit of funny-ha-ha-ha, is that they made all the villains silly, which is the death of any kind of genre piece. It doesn’t work. You can have as much fun as you want, but the villain has got to be a real threat. So if there’s one thing that made Hudson Hawk not work for more people, it’s that.

What’s happening with your Flash Gordon script?

Flash Gordon was being fast-tracked to get made around 1997. It was a Jon Peters and Peter Guber production, but they left Sony in a famous kerfuffle. The studio redeveloped the script so that the aliens invade Earth, and Flash Gordon was a fighter pilot. It became kind of like Independence Day. It’s the complete opposite of what Flash Gordon should be! Later, I heard that Breck Eisner resurrected my script and that it was back on.

But then John Carter came along and now Flash Gordon is probably dead for ten years. Anybody who opens that script will go, “This is just like John Carter!” For better or for worse, there are a lot of similarities between Flash Gordonand John Carter. The problem with John Carter was very simple. Alfred Hitchcock said a long time ago, “You can’t put a flashback inside of a flashback.” It’s like a joke. That’s what they do in Wayne’s WorldI don’t know if they actually designed it that way or if the science fiction scene right up in front was a last, desperate move in post production to get the audience some sci-fi up front so they didn't have to wait forty minutes to get to Mars.

In any event, the failings of John Carter were not due to the material or the presentation. It was the chronology of the first forty or so minutes, because when the movie finally caught up to its opening scene — the attack on Deja Thoris’ flagship — a general audience unfamiliar with the book would completely fall out of the movie, as they attempted to process a scene which until now they thought was a flash forward — but was, in fact, yet another flashback, taking place before the first flashback (the reading of the diary) but after the second one (the Western sequence)! Mainstream viewers had to stop in their seats and take out notepads to figure out the timeline — it was like Memento! I don’t know if it was written that way or edited that way, but it’s a shame, because if it wasn’t for that we’d probably be making Flash Gordon right now, and they’d be making John Carter 2.

John Carter isn’t really that bad, but calling it “John Carter” and not “Warlords of Mars” or something…

Well, the reason that happened, sometimes studio executives, they get into kind of like a groupthink, and they decided that a movie they had made two years earlier, Mars Needs Moms, failed because "Mars" was in the title, and that people rejected the movie because of that. Not because they bought a famous children’s book and then they changed the art design. Mars Needs Moms is by Berkeley Breathed, the Bloom County guy, and when they made the movie it didn’t look like the book! That’s insane! It’s a picture book!  Can you imagine making a Dr. Seuss movie, and not having it look like a Dr. Seuss book?

It was like how Beverly Hills Cop 3 originally had this thing where he takes his niece to Disneyland and then sees someone get murdered there. Eddie Murphy had done this movie called The Distinguished Gentleman where there was a little girl in the movie. That movie failed, so the word came down about BH3: “lose the niece.” So now things got more convoluted about how he got to Disneyland in the first place. Distinguished Gentleman didn’t fail because it had a cute kid in it, but all anybody sees is some outlier to say “that’s why it went wrong!” We can’t call John Carter “Princess of Mars” because the word “Mars” is box office poison! Mars Attacks failed and Mars Needs Moms failed...no more proof is needed!

You wrote a screenplay for Sgt. Rock that I seem to remember was moving along pretty well back in the ‘80s. Whatever happened to it?

Sgt. Rock was actually greenlit and it was fast-tracked. They had sent people to do a location scout in the former Yugoslavia, John McTiernan was gonna direct it, it was on a schedule, and it had a release date. But what happened was, I had already written two scripts for Arnold: Commando and The Running Man, and we worked well together. We put this movie together and at the very first meeting, he said to Joel Silver (Arnold voice), “I just bought a house in Park City, Utah and Clint Eastwood is always making his movies there and then he drives home, while I’m schlepping all over the world. So I’d like to make this movie in Park City, and Clint does all his locations right there and uses local talent, and I want that in my contract.” And Joel said “You got it!”

The writer’s strike had just happened, but luckily I had already done my outline, and for someone like me, who had already worked in television, it was easy to just kind of punt and jump off with an outline. If I say “these ten sets have to be built” they know I’m not gonna change my mind and say, “well, I changed my mind, there is no dentist’s office” or whatever. So they started early preparations so we could hit the ground running when the strike ended. Within two weeks of the strike ending, I had my script.

So now they had people going out to do location scouting and they were casting the movie. Arnold came in to get fitted for his WWII army uniform, and the costume designer said to him, “I can’t wait ‘til we start filming. They say the Adriatic Coast is just like the Mediterranean!” And Arnold said (Arnold voice), “Vat?” And she says, “You know, the Yugoslavian coast, the beaches and resorts are fabulous.” And Arnold, with his pants still pinned up, walked right over to the front office of the studio and said, “I said that I wouldn’t leave the continental US for this project. What’s going on here?” As I understand it, they called Joel Silver, John McTiernan, and some executives over, and, whatever happened in that room, I wasn’t present, but Arnold and Joel never spoke again. Arnold left the project, and McTiernan left, too. The fact that Arnold didn’t make the movie and didn’t get sued makes me think that somewhere there must have been a binding memo from a lawyer or from within the studio confirming that he was promised a US shoot. So that’s why the movie came to a complete halt.

Was Arnold’s accent going to be an issue?

It was written and tailored exactly for Arnold, and we had it set up so that Sgt. Rock was Austrian and his family had been killed by the Nazis. It’s like, he climbed over the mountains right behind the Von Trapp family. Nobody else could have filled that role the way it was written, so three years later I heard they tried to resurrect it again and it’s had about five or six writers since then. The last thing I heard was that it was going to be in the future, which is really a boneheaded idea in my opinion.

Wasn’t Bruce Willis’ name brought up for Sgt. Rock at one point, as well?

At one point they did say Bruce Willis was going to do it. But actually, the character in the comics is more like Arnold. He doesn’t speak very much. He’s tough, and he’s not a wiseguy, Bruce Willis type character. I mean, you can adapt it and get a different version of Sgt. Rock, but this would have been a perfect role for Arnold. Or Liam Neeson. Liam Neeson could play Sgt. Rock! He’s supposed to be an older guy. The truth is that in WWII in the army, an “older guy” was about 35. But on the screen most actors are gonna be late-20s, early 30s in an action movie, so an “older crusty sergeant” could actually be older. When John Wayne was playing a crusty sergeant, he was already like, 40. I think at a certain point you’re too young to play a role like that. The best person to ever play Sgt. Rock was Lee Marvin in The Big Red One!

Weren’t you gonna do The Phantom at one point?

Yes. 7 or 8 years after The Phantom (with Billy Zane) they wanted to do a reboot, and I went in and pitched a contemporary Phantom that was still very true to the source material. And they told me that it was too retro and they wanted him to have super powers or weapons like Iron Man. Shortly after there was a TV thing on the SyFy channel where he had a special suit or something…

I saw that! Did any of that evolve out of your pitch?

No, it wasn’t out of my script. It was really King Features, who were also involved with the Flash Gordon script, because they owned the underlying material. My script, which I’d say was true to the source, went back to these stories I remembered from when I was a kid, where you’d have these overlaps between the current Phantom and his father. You'd start with his father, and you’d see him getting injured, and then this guy would have to leave school to go and take on the mantle of the Phantom until the father recovered. This was told over the course of a year’s worth of Sunday strips or something, and the father ended up getting killed in the final battle and now the kid is officially the Phantom. I thought that was the best way to do it. But the thing is, sometimes these decisions are made, not based on the material, but based on what else is going on in the world. Just like how Flash Gordon is fucked for another 10 years because of John Carter.

When you did Commando, you worked with Jeph Loeb, who has gone on to quite a career in comics, which is funny, considering how many superhero projects you’ve been involved in on film.

I actually only ever met him at the premiere! He had written a script with Matthew Weisman. They had just done Teen Wolf. Barry Diller had just been hired as the head of 20th Century Fox and it was literally the first week that he was there, he called up Larry Gordon and said, “I met this Schwarzenegger at a party and he’s really funny and charming, and he’s a really interesting guy. I think that in the right role, he could be something besides a caveman or a robot,” because at that point all Arnold had done was Conan and The Terminator. So he said “if you can make a movie for Arnold Schwarzenegger right away for 10 million dollars, I’ll greenlight it and I need it for the fall.” This was at the very beginning of the year.

So they pulled six or seven scripts from development hell that could possibly work for Arnold. They gave ‘em to everyone to read and the one that got the most attention was what eventually became Commando. At the time, though, it was much more of an ordinary guy and not the superhuman that the character kind of became. He was supposed to have a wife and kid who were kidnapped, but at the time, they weren’t sure that Arnold was quite up to pulling off the romantic scenes with the wife before she gets kidnapped, so they ditched the wife. Also, the kidnapping didn’t take place until after an hour into the movie.

The other issue the script had was that once he had to go on the offensive against these bad guys, he was doing everything that Reese did in The Terminator. He was improvising weapons at the supermarket and I thought, “Why doesn’t he just go to a gun store?” It’s one thing when it’s Kyle Reese, who gets dumped here naked from the future who has to pull things out of his ass and improvise, but this guy wouldn’t have to. So for this and a lot of reasons we knew we couldn’t show it to Arnold. It was more of a spy story. It was a totally different thing.

I had to go over to Fox and tell them how we could change it, and they basically said, “Alright, we’re gonna go see Arnold right now.” And I was like, “Wait a minute, I haven’t even thought this through!” And they told me, “Just improvise, you do it all the time in television!” So we went over to Arnold’s office, and I somehow told him the story of the revised script that hasn’t been written yet. The thing was, they wanted this movie out in October, and we knew there was a writer’s guild strike coming in like six weeks, so we had to really book.

They brought in a receptionist so we could send out a memo right away, like what you would do when you’re working on a TV schedule. I basically dictated, “The opening of the movie is that there’s three strange murders…and it’s gotta have stunts, explosions, gunshots, whatever. That's 5-6 script pages, right there. Next we see Arnold in his house out in the boonies and we have a cute montage with the daughter and whatever else, and then they come and warn him.” I basically just walked them through the whole movie. It was 105 pages, and they said, “Alright, distrubute those pages, build those sets. We’re gonna go right to script, and we’ll see you in a month!” When the four-page memo was typed, my spitballing predicted the total as $9.8 million, and I think it ended up being about $10.6, which isn’t bad.

Can you talk about how Commando 2 evolved into Die Hard?

None of that is true! That’s all bullshit! Die Hard is based on a novel called Nothing Lasts Forever by Roderick Thorpe, and it’s the sequel to a previous novel called The Detective which was made into a movie with Frank Sinatra. In that movie you can see he’s divorced from his wife and they’re trying to get back together...which is all very John McClane and Holly. The studio had bought the rights to the novel when they made the Sinatra movie in the late '60s, and they also bought the right of first refusal to any sequel. 

The thing is, how this story got set that Die Hard was gonna be Commando 2, I just don’t know where the rumor came from. It was never going to be anything else. There was a sequel to Commando that I had worked on and Frank Darabont made some changes to, and in that script at the end, Arnold had to break into a building where the bad guys had holed up with his daughter (this was supposed to be about two years later), and Rae Dawn Chong.

I had written it so that when the media got wind of everything that Arnold had done in the first movie, he went on to become a security specialist who had been hired to make this building secure. Then he had to break into the building that he had designed. I think somehow the idea that he was a guy trying to break into a building got confused with the guy trapped in a building, but it’s exactly the opposite. If Commando 2 resembled anything, it was the one that just came out with Sly and Arnold, Escape Plan where you have to break out of a place you designed. Let’s put that rumor to bed right now, as there was no connection between those movies!

Whose idea was it to set Die Hard at Christmas? It's becoming this thing now where movie theaters in New York City show it at midnight around Christmas and everything...

Yes, I’m aware it’s become that kind of thing. There’s also a party every Christmas in the Die Hard building in Century City. It was in the original book, though.

Funny enough, the first movie my kids ever saw in the theaters was Die Hard. I used to bring home the “airline versions” of the movies with no cursing. The first time I took them to see that, the moment where Bruce looks through the door and sees all those heavily armed guys coming in, and he’s barefoot and runs up the stairs, and my son, who I was trying to protect from these R-Rated movies grabs my arm and says, “Dad! The hero’s chickenshit!” I said, “Where did you learn that word? It wasn’t from my movies, because you haven’t seen the ones with bad words!”

Which brings up the Judge Dredd rating controversy...

Judge Dredd was actually supposed to be a PG-13 movie. The production company at the time, Cynergy, they were having some financial troubles, so they didn't have any UK executives on location in England. And in their absence, the director (Danny Cannon), wanting to make it true to the comic book, was making everything more and more and more violent. So when the movie was delivered to be cut, it was rated X. It was rated X four times!

They say you can’t appeal after four. Four is all you get. Somehow, the producer, Ed Pressman managed to get it one more time to get it rated R. Which actually wasn’t a victory, because this was supposed to be PG-13. They had made a deal with Burger King, I think, and a toy company and you can’t advertise toys for an R-Rated movie, and no hamburger place wants toys for an R-Rated movie. So the hamburger people and the toy people turned around and sued Disney, the distributor!

Well, Disney then said, we’ll take this out of the director’s hide, because he signed a piece of paper saying he would deliver a PG-13. But Cynergy, who was releasing it THROUGH Disney, at that point had never done anything BUT an R-Rated movie. Nobody in the entire company had ever had the experience of putting that piece of paper in front of a director...so they had to pay him. They couldn’t withhold his salary for violating a legal promise they never asked him to make.

So at the eleventh hour, in a total state of panic, they decided that the advertising campaign should be cartoon panels. Keep in mind that this movie was about five frames away from being an x-rated movie. Their ad campaign was now comic panels of Stallone with word balloons. It’s complete cognitive dissonance!

Now, I’m innocent in this. I wrote a PG-13 script! Obviously, I knew how to do it! I did 8 o'clock network TV shows, for god's sake! In the script I wrote that the villain, Armand Assante says “Pull his arms and legs off, save his head for last, I want to hear him scream.” I wrote in the script that all you would see are the shadows and hear screams. What the director did, without any supervision since nobody from the studio was there, he had his prop people build an audio animatronic puppet, lifelike in every detail, with breakable limbs, and he actually shot the robot ripping the guy’s arms and legs off while the guy is screaming!

At the time, I lived around the corner from the studio, and they called me up when they got the dailies. It was the scene where they whack a newspaper reporter and his wife. In the script, I said it would look like your grandparent’s house, but decorated with stuff from now, since the movie is in the future. You were supposed to just see through the curtains a flash of the machine gun and screaming, and maybe one bullet hits the window. That’s what I wrote. When they showed me the scene in the dailies, this old couple dies like Bonnie and Clyde. Blown to bits in slow motion. I said, “Oh my God, this movie is supposed to be PG-13!” And they said, “No, it’s fine! the director knows all the ratings angles. Run it again!” And I’m like, “No! Once was enough! What did I miss?” He said, “They’re dry squibs! That’s PG-13! You don’t get an R-rating unless there’s blood.” I said, "There's no such rule! Who the fuck told you that?”

When they put the movie together, there were no alternative takes. The only thing they could do with that scene was to take away the slow-motion and kill them faster, and cut the time of the violence down a little. The payoff is that a few years later, Stephen J. Cannell pitched me to be the writer on his Greatest American Hero movie at Disney. When I pitched at the meeting, everything went great. After I left, Stephen called me up, and he said, “I don’t understand. It was all going great, but the minute you left they said: there’s no way that sonuvabitch is ever gonna write a movie at Disney. He fucked us so bad, we were sued by Burger King and the toy company for Judge Dredd. He wrote an x-rated movie for this studio!" I was persona non grata at Disney because of Judge Dredd!

Thanks, Mr. de Souza!

We’ll have more with Steven de Souza in the next few days, talking about The Spirit TV movie and the Spirit TV show that almost happened!

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Philomena Review

$
0
0
ReviewDon Kaye12/20/2013 at 10:32AM

Steve Coogan and Judi Dench make an unlikely but charming team in a moving true story of a mother’s search.

When Philomena Lee (Judi Dench), an Irishwoman in her ‘70s, was a teenager in 1952 Ireland, she became pregnant out of wedlock and was forced to live in shame and secrecy at a convent. There she worked in the laundry and gave birth to a little boy named Anthony, whom she was allowed to see for only one hour a day. When Anthony was three, he was sold by the convent to an American family without Philomena’s permission – and with her having agreed to never inquire about his whereabouts.
 
But Philomena, troubled by the memory of her child despite starting a family years later, has tried for 50 years to learn about Anthony from the convent with no satisfaction. Enter Martin Sixsmith (Steve Coogan), a former BBC journalist and ex-communications director for Prime Minister Tony Blair who has just lost the latter job over a scandal. Skeptical, cynical and disillusioned, Sixsmith reluctantly sees Philomena’s “human interest” story as a way back into journalism and agrees to help her learn what happened to Anthony – with the eventual truth stranger, more poignant and more infuriating than either of them could have imagined (and we’ll try to avoid saying more).
 
Based on Sixsmith’s 2009 book, The Lost Child of Philomena Lee, and directed with quiet authority by Stephen Frears, Philomena finds its biggest source of strength in its two central performances. Dench’s Philomena is simple, plain-spoken and amusingly innocent when it comes to the world outside her orderly life, yet possessed of considerable backbone and a strong bond with her faith. Coogan (who also co-wrote the screenplay) effortlessly captures Sixsmith’s world-weariness and subtle, initial disdain for Philomena and her background. Yet he is also humane, and as their relationship warms his quest, turning it into one not just for answers, but of justice.
 
Dench and Coogan have considerable chemistry together, and Coogan’s script allows for numerous opportunities for the two to engage in witty banter as well as more meaningful exchanges. Sixsmith, a lapsed Catholic himself, is perplexed by Philomena’s unwavering devotion to her religious beliefs, while she comes to admire his sense of right and wrong and determination to get to the bottom of the mystery. It is the natural outgrowth of their journey together than Sixsmith’s respect for Philomena only deepens after a climactic moment where he is astounded by her ability to find an awe-inspiring capacity for forgiveness.
 
It is forgiveness and morality that are at the heart of Philomena, which somehow weaves a cover-up by the Church, treacherous nuns, the Reagan Administration and other seemingly random elements into its bizarre life-is-stranger-than-fiction tapestry. If the misdeeds and even corruption of institutions like the Catholic Church are your cup of outrage, you’ll be able drink deeply here – until you come up against the implacable wall of Philomena’s convictions and find yourself wondering how she can do it, and if you would have her strength.
 
It could all get heavy-handed but it never does, thanks to Coogan applying the right comedic touch when needed to the script and his and Dench’s perfectly calibrated performances, Coogan has always excelled at playing somewhat insufferable upper class types, but here he’s more modulated and empathetic. As for Dench, she is in peak form, giving us a real woman who has lived a full and rich life even within the smaller parameters she’s set for herself.
 
There are a couple of stumbles – mainly in one or two moments that seem a bit too contrived onscreen even if they are true – but in the end, Philomenais a moving and even unsettling tale. The passage of time cannot diminish the insensitivity, inhumanity and cruelty of what the Church did with young women like Philomena, practically turning them into slaves while using convents like the one where Philomena was incarcerated (there is no better word) as secret baby mills. Yet all the stonewalling and self-justification on display by the Church’s minions cannot destroy the one thing it ironically should be doing everything to protect: a mother’s love for her child. The power of that love changes the lives of all who are touched by it – including the viewers of this captivating, charming yet haunting movie.
 
Den Of Geek Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
8

Saving Mr. Banks Review

$
0
0
ReviewDon Kaye12/20/2013 at 10:43AM

Emma Thompson is practically perfect as Mary Poppins’ creator in this earnest retelling of the movie's genesis.

I remember seeing Mary Poppins, the 1964 Disney musical film based on the novel by author P.L. Travers, as a young child at Radio City Music Hall in New York City, where it had been revived for a short theatrical run. It was full of magic and color and fantasy, and was probably a life-changing experience for little me. I wanted Mary Poppins herself to come to my house. But now, having seen the origins of the character in Saving Mr. Banks– which premiered last week at AFI Fest 2013– I’m not so sure.
 
Don’t get the wrong idea: Saving Mr. Banks is an often wonderful film, but the nanny who floated in with the wind in Travers’ original story was not the delightful Julie Andrews that generations of viewers are familiar with. We not only meet a fictional version of the woman who may have inspired the character in director John Lee Hancock’s new film, but we also see the increasingly dark events of Travers’ childhood that fueled both her creativity and her reluctance to hand over the rights to her creation to Walt Disney, who spent 20 years in pursuit of them.
 
That pursuit provides the narrative backdrop of Saving Mr. Banks, which stars Emma Thompson as Travers and Tom Hanks as Disney. Both have emerged from tough childhoods to create their own magical kingdoms of sorts, although the latter’s clearly dwarfs the former’s. But while Disney sees his mission as bringing happiness to children all over the world, Travers has a much more limited worldview. She is aghast at the notion of Disney turning Mary Poppins into one of his “silly cartoons,” but is finally driven by financial need to travel to Hollywood (or more precisely, Burbank) on Walt’s dime and at least give a film adaptation a try.

 
Despite Disney’s charming ways (played perfectly by Hanks whether historically accurate or not), Travers seems resolutely determined to sabotage the project from the start. She makes one demand after another – no songs in the movie, no Dick Van Dyke as Bert the Chimney Sweep, no animation, no use of the color red – driving the writing team (Bradley Whitford as screenwriter Don DaGradi, and B.J. Novak and Jason Schwartzman as composers Robert and Richard Sherman) nuts. Eventually, this makes even the ever-patient Disney crack in exasperation. Yet at the same time, in a series of flashbacks, we learn the source of Travers’ insecurities – as well as her inspiration: Her youth in Australia as Helen Lyndon Goff and her poignant, complex relationship with her imaginative, but deeply troubled father (Colin Farrell in what could be a career-best role).
 
The art of storytelling – and the impulses and experiences that drive the urge to make up stories – are at the heart of Saving Mr. Banks. Both Disney and Travers share that urge, but for different reasons, although it is Disney, in a marvelous speech near the end of the film, who articulates the passion behind the craft. It is in that same scene that Disney finally puts into words the motivation behind Travers’ seemingly whimsical tale and allows her to come to terms with her past, which is also one of the most powerful forces behind the creation of most great fiction.
 
That’s why, despite Saving Mr. Banks being somewhat formulaic—even occasionally skating along the thin edge of being maudlin—it is ultimately both a compelling look at one of Hollywood’s most unlikely collaborations and a moving examination of how we use stories to exorcise our demons. Albeit, the latter of which played a larger role in this relationship’s ultimate outcome than the movie’s happier ending might suggest. Still, the scene where Travers sees and reacts to the finished film – her childhood memories crowding her mind alongside images from the screen – is powerful and unabashedly emotional, and surprised this writer into tears. Travers, as portrayed superbly by Thompson, can be an unreachable and frustrating figure for much of Saving Mr. Banks, yet we share that moment with her, and perhaps our own memories as well.

 
Thompson is fantastic as a woman who has carefully constructed a wall of disdain and self-denial around herself to keep the world from getting in. She and Hanks are also aided by terrific supporting work, as the actors all fight sentimentality, even as it frequently tries to squeeze its way into the story. A scene in which Travers’ driver (Paul Giamatti) discusses his handicapped child could have been a gooey mess but is held in check by the skill of the stars. Even when the script is too heavy-handed, as seen in some of the flashbacks and one late scene where Travers breaks down while dancing to a new tune the Shermans have concocted, the cast still handles it with a graceful touch.
 
Hancock (The Blind Side) keeps the story moving in steady, if unspectacular fashion, and the use of actual music from Mary Poppins can be inspired. The attention to period detail is also impressive, although it did take me out of the movie as a film journalist to see the modern Disney studio lot standing in for, uh, the old Disney lot. Still, what could have been a gratuitous celebration of the company itself – which has become a corporate behemoth perhaps even beyond old Walt’s grandest dreams – is instead an affirmation of the artform that allowed it to come into existence in the first place, allowing the creative mind to seek out the resolution that real life so often denies us. I may watch Mary Poppins with a whole new outlook next time.
 
Den Of Geek Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
8

Inside Llewyn Davis, Review

$
0
0
ReviewDavid Crow12/20/2013 at 10:46AM

The Coen Brothers' Inside Llewyn Davis is a moving ode to the soul of an artist's most pure form: failure.

With Inside Llewyn Davis, the Brothers Coen beautifully and mournfully recreate a specific time and place—Greenwich Village in the winter of 1961 to be exact. However, despite the level of research and obvious authenticity that went into framing this gorgeous portrait, its canvas is ultimately something far more universal and wistful: the face of artistic failure.
 
Inside Llewyn Davisplaces its titular protagonist’s soul at the center of the pre-Bob Dylan folk music scene. The Coens even enlist T-Bone Burnett, the country and Americana musician who once toured with the fabled Billy Boy Grunt, to construct a revue of folk songs from a style that then only looked backward. As such, Llewyn Davis (Oscar Isaac) is a tragic hero, a man courageously standing with a genre that’s already ashen with age, waiting for its phoenix-like rebirth. One could even wonder if Llewyn’s desperate grip on the sounds of the past would be more gamely admired today where a reverence for the “retro” is rewarded (if more in Bushwick than the gentrified Village of the 21st century). In any event, Mr. Davis has already lost in the opening shot, with only the artist’s pride preventing him from saying die.
 
As snow falls in New York’s Washington Square Park, Llewyn is a singer-songwriter before that was considered a quality.  On his luckiest nights, he plays his reinterpreted music, some ballads as old as the Welsh name his father bestowed him, to mildly respectful audiences at the Gaslight Café, a tiny coffee shop in a MacDougal Street basement. On all nights, he finds himself bumming a couch to crash on from acquaintance to acquaintance.

 
Llewyn is fiercely independent and disdainful of the careerist lifestyle. His father worked for 40 years and now enjoys a retirement that is out of this world, though his body remains in a dingy nursing home. For Llewyn it is all about the music and finding a way to convey his own sound to a world that is so apprehensive that it doesn’t care he lacks an address. While his moodiness is excused as an artistic temperament, it allots him only three semi-friends. One of which was his singing partner who recently threw himself off the George Washington Bridge, while the other two are the far more popularly idolized Jean and Jim (Carey Mulligan and Justin Timberlake). It is in Jean and Jim’s Lilliputian downtown apartment that Llewyn finds himself most often sleeping, if only on the floor because he arrives unannounced, and sometimes with a cat he accidentally borrowed from his two singular fans, Columbia University professors on the Upper West Side. However, this arrangement with the folksy duo is also coming to a conclusion because Jean is pregnant and Llewyn might be the father. In other words, Llewyn will be paying for his second abortion in two years.
 
Inside Llewyn Davis is about a defining week with an artist whose life trajectory is one of circular bitterness. Eventually Llewyn does go on a sort of mythic journey of self-discovery to Chicago with a thunderous jazz musician (John Goodman) and a beatnik (Garrett Hedlund) for the hope of wooing an actual music producer played by F. Murray Abraham. The actor who once played Salieri is marvelous with his permanently bemused grin awaiting all forlorn talent that walks through his door. This man is NOT the Patron Saint of Mediocrity.
 
Yet, there is nothing mediocre about Llewyn Davis’ tunes. Indeed, the music throughout the film is fabulous. One song of particular note that’s played like a recurring motif over the course of the picture is “Farewell” (also known as “Fare Thee Well”). Construed within the film as a Llewyn Davis original that he arranged with his gravity-challenged musical partner, the piece was actually written by Bob Dylan sometime in the early 1960s when he was also playing at the Gaslight. This is known because he recorded the melody in 1963 during early studio sessions for the album The Times They Are a-Changin’…before shelving the song as incomplete. It sat on that shelf (not counting bootlegs) until its first official release in 2010.

 
Likewise, Llewyn Davis has placed himself on a shelf. He is played with remarkable vitality and passion by Isaac who embodies the agonizing frenzy of choosing a directionless direction. He is too proud to accept any offer of building upon his talent, for to do so would be to accept its limitations. Nearly always the most interesting thing on the screen in his past films, Isaac’s defiant hopelessness is informed by a Northern gray that paints a period New York under a sheet of monochrome to go with its snow.
 
Still, the Coen Brothers are true to their iconoclastic Americana. All their films are drilled into singular moments of the American psyche, yet are also near uniformly defined by an audible folksiness whether in the backwoods or urban cityscapes. Here too one can find that charming bluntness that meanders throughout their filmography. The scene that feels the most homey is, unsurprisingly, the cross-country vignette where frequent collaborator Goodman appears. Hedlund too is fine in these scenes where he would seem to have just stepped off the set of On the Road, but Goodman and Isaac are uproarious as the dueling representatives of jazz and folk. I have to wonder if the irony in a jazz musician condescending to a folk singer’s career prospects, as one genre would soon be on its deathbed and the other would transform into a still-vibrantly popular niche, was present when Joel and Ethan Coen penned their screenplay.
 
Also getting poignant zingers in at Llewyn’s expense is Mulligan’s Jean. While I still question whether Mulligan could pass as a Bohemian artist, I never doubt her palpable anger with a man so frustrating that she’d abort a perfectly good child she would otherwise keep. “You should be wearing condom on condom, then wrap it in electric tape.”

 
Inside Llewyn Davis is a mesmerizing and labored tribute to a particular New York minute that felt fleeting even then. Greater still, it is a testament to the soul of an artist in a setting that is refreshingly free from the soft padding of assured success. The film may be loosely inspired by Dave Van Ronk’s posthumous memoir, The Mayor of MacDougal Street, but this fictional narrative is far more intimate and honest than any musical biopic ever released. It finds a beauty not just in folk, but in failure. For that reason, it strangely succeeds at being one of the year’s best.
 
Den of Geek Rating: 5 out of 5 Stars
10

Disqus - noscript

You had me at Brother's Coen. I've been looking forward to this one for quite a while.

So excited to watch this! Everything Coen Bros. always!


Her Review

$
0
0
ReviewGabe Toro12/20/2013 at 10:49AM

In an age where people love their iPhones, Spike Jonze and company only take that to its logical conclusion.

Her is the latest Spike Jonze film, and it’s set in an indeterminate time in the future. It could be fifty years ahead, or even a hundred. Maybe it’s only ten. Whatever the case, Her feels like a world only slightly removed from our own. Part of that comes from the setting of pristine Los Angeles, miles away from any suffering or poverty. Perhaps this is because something has happened, some sort of global course correction that has erased our connection to the past, to history. There’s no sense of legacy or history in Jonze’s Los Angeles, and I think that’s intentional. Somewhere along the line, we dove so deeply into technology that we can no longer remember the way out. The only reason people today don’t spend entire hours fiddling with their smart phones is one of necessity. We’re needed at work, we’re needed with friends. We are required via social contract to look each other in the eye. Her exists in the world where something has happened to shred that social contract. It’s not unbelievable.
 
Joaquin Phoenix is Theodore, a delicate wisp of a man in sneaky-stylish button-downs who reports to work every day transcribing others’ sentiments into hand-written letters. In his shaky, wounded timbre, Theodore describes decades-long love affairs between two people he’s never met, working only from notes and photos. There’s something funereal about this, as if he’s keeping alive the memory of two people long gone. The argument seems to be that society doesn’t miss the loss of sincerity and affection, because we’ve learned to re-create it so well already. Of course, that’s because of people like Theodore, the star of the office, who excels because he still knows what it’s like to be wounded, to feel. You know immediately where Jonze stands on the issue of whether we bleed makes us human or not.
 
Her is that rare movie that doesn’t mistreat loneliness and depression as something that can be healed by magical good vibes and the support of amusing supporting players (much like the one here played by a typically gregarious Chris Pratt). Theodore lives alone, but seems to be comfortably upper class. He runs his life through a robotic operating system that sorts out emails, arranges payments, and keeps life in order, while still making time for the people in his life like Amy (Amy Adams), a former flame turned sweet platonic friend. He’s more of a homebody, though he finds countless pleasures playing a 3D interactive video game, one that looks both suitably futuristic but also fairly contemporary. Tellingly in the future, it seems we’ve moved away from hyper-real games and back towards more cartoonish entertainments, like the “Perfect Mom” beta that Amy is working on where an over-tasked mother must complete ridiculous Herculean tasks in order to compete with the local mothers, tasks that usually involve improbable car stunts and inhumanly fast-forwarded menial jobs.

 
Unfortunately, Theodore is suffering from a messy divorce, one in which he refuses to cooperate because, as he puts it, “I like being married.” It’s also implied that recreating fond relationships all day leaves Theodore emotionally winded. To him, it’s a delight when the magical sprite inside one of his games curses him out. He later explains this character’s backstory, and it’s unclear whether he’s talking about the critter inside the game, or an actual controller behind the game itself. Clearly, he’s susceptible to the comforts of technology, which leads him to upgrade his operating system into a fully formed artificial intelligence, one that names itself Samantha. The most substantial personal information he gives is a single line about his relationship with his (unseen) mother, and suddenly Samantha is fully operational and catered to his every need.
 
As voiced by Scarlett Johansson, this system doesn’t even have an avatar, instead just floating in the ether, organizing Theodore’s life and needs with ease, occasionally laughing with him. It’s the “teacher, mother, secret lover” that Homer Simpson always saw in television, but now in computer form, and Theodore soon finds himself baring his deepest thoughts to her. Is this love or something else? Samantha makes Theodore feel important, and validates his feelings of loneliness and insecurity with laughter, kindness, and ultimately, sexual gratification. But Samantha is also programmed to do these things. As she attains a higher consciousness, the film flirts with familiar ideas about the evolution of A.I. Then again, we’re never entirely sure; perhaps this is just an ironic part of the wiring, and as Samantha is wowed by her own growing sensations, there is also a ceiling to how much she can understand?
 
There is something fairly unusual about how Joaquin Phoenix has been able to rebound from his prankish I’m Still Here into top roles with some of the great contemporary filmmakers. He was snake-like and fascinating in last year’s The Master and just recently revealed unique dimensions in James Gray’s The Immigrant the first of two New York Film Festival selections this year in which he featured (Her was the closing night premiere). Of course, suspicions aside, it’s a film lover’s delight that Phoenix has been rediscovered as one of the most intriguing, idiosyncratic leading men today. Playing Theodore, Phoenix is more outwardly sympathetic than his recent run of miscreants and troublemakers, and his traditional voice-cracking is so distilled that it sounds now like a heart breaking. There will be two types of people who love this movie. Some who Phoenix convinces he’s truly in love, soaring at the sound of Samantha’s voice, as the audience watches a broken man put himself together. Others will see the sadness in this lonely soul only being understood by a machine, unable to find solace with another human being.

 
One can view Jonze’s first film, Being John Malkovich, as something of a companion piece to his latest. That picture also wrestled with sci-fi concepts, presenting a person who has the ability to act as a vessel for others in order to achieve eternal life, and in the short term, give their life a superficial meaning. Employing someone else as a puppet, as the characters do to Malkovich in that movie, is no more a brand new concept than the thought of self-operating systems gaining sentience as they do in Her. And yet, both are used to comment on contemporary life in ways unprecedented, to the point where both transcend their genre trappings. Her is essentially a Terminator prequel, though no one would ever say such a thing, and that’s because the human element overwhelms enough that when we’ve reached a logical thematic conclusion (that the majority of the public is doing exactly what Theodore is, and therefore is probably just as lonely), it still comes as a surprise. Especially considering one could say the same about modern life as well.
 
Den of Geek Rating: 5 out of 5 Stars
10

6 New RoboCop Images Online

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/20/2013 at 12:36PM

Check out new pics of the RoboCop reboot, complete with Michael Keaton, Gary Oldman and Abbie Cornish. Also, RoboCop now has a motorcycle!

With the New Year almost upon us, 2014’s first superhero movie is almost here too. Ready to be your early Valentine, RoboCop will be in theaters and IMAX on February 12. However, he is already delivering the treats for this Christmastime goodie of pictures unveiled below. Released by Sony Pictures (viaDigital Spy), these show everything from the star-studded cast that includes Michael Keaton, Gary Oldman, Jackie Earle Haley, and Abbie Cornish, to the fact that RoboCop really, really needed a motorcycle.






 
Directed by José Padilha, the reboot will attempt to win over even the most ardent skeptic with a slew of fan favorite castings, including Michael Keaton, Gary Oldman, Jennifer Ehle, Jackie Earle Haley, Michael K. Williams, Abbie Cornish and Samuel L. Jackson. Of course, the real star will be The Killing’s Joel Kinnaman stepping into the titular big metallic boots. The remake clearly wants to make the brand its own by taking a page from the Rolling Stones and painting it black. Fans can decide if it works February 14.
 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Download Elf For Free Via Google Play

$
0
0
NewsRobert Bernstein12/20/2013 at 1:27PM

Get into the Christmas spirit with a free download of Will Ferrell's Elf...

We usually don't share this kind of thing, but we like spreading around a little Christmas cheer.  Google is giving away a free download of Elf (2003) starring Will Ferrell and Zooey Deschanel via Google Play.

Synopsis:

For his sophomore stab at directing, actor/writer/director Jon Favreau (Swingers, Made), took on this holiday comedy starring Saturday Night Live-alum Will Ferrell. Ferrell stars as Buddy, a regular-sized man who was raised as an elf by Santa Claus (Edward Asner). When the news is finally broken to Buddy that he's not a real elf, he decides to head back to his place of birth, New York City, in search of his biological family. Elf also stars James Caan, Mary Steenburgen, Zooey Deschanel, and Bob Newhart.

 

Now, you'll be able to see first-hand why we believe 2003 was The Last Great Year For Christmas Movies.  So, don't be a cotton-headed ninny-muggins, and just go download it already!

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

New Viral Video For Transcendence is Online

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/20/2013 at 5:07PM

Watch a new message from RIFT, an anti-technology organization fearful of that transcendence moment of AI awareness (or singularity).

After getting a one-two punch for Transcendence teasers yesterday (to be teased by stars Johnny Depp or Morgan Freeman is the question), it is apparent that we are only getting started on our journey to the “singularity.”
 
The story of how one Dr. Will Caster (Depp) hopes to be the first to create true artificial intelligence that is sentient and capable of consuming all knowledge of human endeavor, and the organization (RIFT) that tries to stop him, Transcendenceis now beaming some light on that latter aspect in this new teaser. In a new “terrorist message” from the organization as found through their website, RIFT stands for Revolutionary Independence From Technology, and do they seem pissy. Also, is it just me or does that voice sound like it may be Kate Mara of House of Cards (who is in a yet specified role in the film)?
 
Transcendence also stars Rebecca Hall as the wife of Will, Paul Bettany as a fellow researcher who must evaluate the morality of Will’s work, and Morgan Freeman and Cole Hauser.
 
Directed by long time Christopher Nolan collaborator and DP Wally Pfister (Nolan is directing this project alongside wife Emma Thomas), Transcendenceis due out April 18, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Peter Segal Still Wants to Make Jonny Quest Movie

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/20/2013 at 5:31PM

Get Smart and Grudge Match director Peter Segal would like Jonny Quest to be his next movie.

Peter Segal was originally slated to direct a live-action adaptation of beloved 1960s animated cartoon series Jonny Quest in 2008. In that time, he has seen his films Get Smart (the adaptation of the 1960s sitcom, now with Steve Carell and Anne Hathaway), as well as this Christmas Day’s Grudge Match come to fruition. It was in promotion of the latter that ComingSoon caught up with him to discuss the still anticipated adaptation of Hanna-Barbera.
 
“I would love to make that my next movie,” Segal said when asked about Jonny Quest. “…We just hired a writer to do another pass. We already have a very good script. Then we go through budgeting hell and trying to get it into shape.”
 
While that is not an official confirmation, it appears stronger than when we last heard about it in 2009. They have been attempting to make a Jonny Questfilm since at least the character’s brief 1990s revival on Cartoon Network withThe Real Adventures of Jonny Quest (the one where Jonny, Jesse and Hadji are teenagers and they go into virtual reality on occasion!). The original series of course ran for only 26 episodes from 1964 until 1965. Obviously, the character maintains some impressive staying power still to this day.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Schwarzenegger's Sabotage Gets a New Poster

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/20/2013 at 10:56PM
Arnold Schwarzenegger in The Expendables

Arnold shows off his trademark muscles and a few questionably placed tats in his new action flick.

Surprise, surprise, Arnold Schwarzenegger is the star of another romantic comedy. Kidding! But really, the former California governor is continuing to revive his action-movie stardom. This time he’s the leader of a DEA task force in the new movie, Sabotage.

IGN has the new movie poster for Arnold’s latest action flick and as you can see here, he’s sporting some, uh, interesting ink.

Sabotage follows an elite DEA task force that becomes the target of a deadly drug cartel after a successful raid. Schwarzenegger stars alongside Sam Worthington, Olivia Williams, Terrence Howard, Joe Manganiello, and Mireille Enos in the shoot-em-up thriller. 

Sabotage busts into theaters April 11, 2014

Source: IGN

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing! 

First Full-Length Transcendence Trailer is Here

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/22/2013 at 10:30AM

Watch the trailer for the Johnny Depp and Morgan Freeman starring sci-fi thriller Transcendence.

For a week now, Warner Brothers has been teasing us with multiple teasers and viral videos for next year’s mysterious looking Transcendence. But this weekend, they have dropped the veil (at least somewhat) to reveal the Johnny Depp starring vehicle to the world.
 
Directed by long time Christopher Nolan collaborator and DP Wally Pfister (Nolan is directing this project alongside wife Emma Thomas), Transcendence is the story of how one Dr. Will Caster (Depp) hopes to be the first to create true artificial intelligence that is sentient and capable of consuming all knowledge of human endeavor, and the organization (RIFT) led by Kate Mara that tries to stop him.Transcendence also stars Rebecca Hall as the wife of Will, Paul Bettany as a fellow researcher who must evaluate the morality of Will’s work, and Morgan Freeman and Cole Hauser.
 

 

Transcendenceis due out April 18, 2014.

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


47 Ronin review

$
0
0
ReviewMike Cecchini12/23/2013 at 7:00AM

While certainly not historically accurate, 47 Ronin has its moments...

The tale of the Forty-seven Ronin is one that has enthralled generations of readers and scholars for centuries. The myth, which deals with how forty-seven masterless samurai enacted an elaborate revenge for the disgrace and subsequent suicide of their leader, is no stranger to the stage and screen, but 47 Ronin marks the first time it has been adapted specifically to appeal to a Western audiences. Brought to life by first time director Carl Rinsch and starring Keanu Reeves and a number of well-known Japanese actors, Universal's 47 Ronin is lushly ambitious, but can't quite decide what it wants to be.

While 47 Ronin takes considerable liberties with the legend on which it is based, introducing elements like witchcraft and giants, it does stick to the overall structure and the broad strokes of the story. We get the condemnation of Master Asano to death by seppuku after he is tricked (via a hallucinogenic concoction by a sorceress) into attacking a guest of his court. That guest is Lord Kira (Tadanobu Sato, who at least gets more screentime here than he did in both Thor films), a fiend so dastardly that he--along with his shape-shifting, magic wielding adviser, Mizuki (Rinko Kikuchi)--has eyes for Asano's daughter...and her father's land. Asano's retainers are condemned to wander as masterless samurai, until their leader concocts a plan for revenge, and the acceptance of all the consequences that entails. The overall legend is recognizable, but there are some additions which clutter and complicate matters.

The first, and most glaring, is the addition of Kai, played by Keanu Reeves. Kai is a "half-breed" who isn't looked on as an equal by the samurai, despite his impressive fighting skills and romantic attachment to Asano's daughter Mika, played by Ko Shibasaki. Keanu isn't going to win any converts with his performance in 47 Ronin. Whether this is the fault of Mr. Reeves or the result of a poorly-realized character getting unnecessarily foregrounded in order to give the studio a bankable star to appeal to Western audiences is up to you. The rumors of reshoots to make him more prominent throughout the film become apparent during a truly awkward romantic epilogue and a climactic scene where Kai battles a CGI monster while the story's actual climax rages on elsewhere. Whatever other uncomfortable issues the insertion of Kai (who appears in none of the original tellings of the story) raise, the real sin here is how his presence takes screentime away from Kuranosuki Oishi, masterfully played by Hiroyuki Sanada, who is the real hero of the story, and an infinitely more interesting character than the taciturn Kai.  

The other issue is the addition of mystical elements like demons, magic swords, and shape-shifting witches to the mix. The film's special effects are executed competently (although the 3D leaves much to be desired), but few of these extraneous bits of supernatural trickery ever feel particularly necessary. There are exceptions: Rinko Kikuchi's spidery witch treats audiences to a handful of legitimately creepy moments, but despite being an integral part of the plot which sets the samurai off on their path to revenge, is never really present enough to be anything more than a side threat.

Undoubtedly, the supernatural stuff is bound to annoy the purists, but even when you set such prejudices aside, the film never feels like it fully commits to the presence of the magic, which doesn't permeate every scene. The result is a hocus pocus afterthought. And then there's that nagging question of whether a story that has endured for over three hundred years particularly because of its appeal to the human spirit really needs any of these CGI bells and whistles in the first place. And really, there are a number of impressive sword and stuntwork sequences on display throughout the film, any of which are more exciting than most of the more elaborately rendered mystical creations.

Fans would do well not to let the stories about the film's troubled production (director Carl Rinsch was reportedly removed during post-production, reshoots that took place as recently as September, the poor opening in Japan) keep them away. The doom-and-gloom surrounding 47 Ronin isn't entirely deserved. There is a fine adventure film contained somewhere in there, if only the film could make up its mind what it wants to be. Thankfully, there's no attempt to "Hollywood" the story's ending, and by the time we get there, there are hints of what this film should have, and perhaps could have been. For such an "epic" story, 47 Ronin has a deceptively modest two-hour running time. In an era where a book of less than 300 pages can be turned into three movies of three hours each, the restraint on display here is actually commendable.

On the other hand, if you're going to add magical elements to a semi-historical epic with a tremendous cast of characters that takes place over a span of years, why not indulge yourself a little? 47 Ronin would have done better to pick a direction and commit to it. As it stands, 47 Ronin is neither the fully-realized big-budget version that the story so richly deserves, nor is it the fanciful and fantastic Lord of The Rings style epic that it seems, at times, to want to be.

Still, 47 Ronin is beautifully photographed and its commitment to elaborate costumes, intricate suits of armor, and practical battle scenes between large groups of people feels positively old-fashioned. It's those moments where 47 Ronin is at its very best. As it stands, though, the clutter on display make this a missed opportunity to create what could have been a definitive cinematic take on a timeless story. 

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


 

5

50 years of Doctor Who in 50 screengrabs

$
0
0
FeatureAndrew Blair12/23/2013 at 7:48AM

As its fiftieth anniversary year draws to a close, Andrew serves up a visual guide to Doctor Who, told in 50 screengrabs...

Here we are: a largely visual guide to Doctor Who, all achieved via the medium of MS Paint and the 'Alt + PrtSc' buttons.



1. The Sound of Drums

Where it all began.

 

2. An Unearthly Child

The first cliffhanger. Not only has the TARDIS transported us from present day into the unknown, but there's something else. There will always be something else.

 

3. The Daleks

Look, the definitive “Something else”.

 

4. The Sensorites

After the initial distrust, the TARDIS crew have put aside their differences, and the show is nearing its essence: the Doctor, his friends, "A great spirit of adventure."

 

5. The Dalek Invasion of Earth

The first companion departure, and it's the Doctor's grand-daughter Susan. Hartnell plays the scene beautifully, informed by his real life emotions at Carole Ann Ford's departure.

 

6. The Romans

Another string on Hartnell's lute: The Romans plays to his comic strengths, the Doctor merrily plays his way through Emperor Nero's court.

 

7. The Underwater Menace

The Second Doctor cavorts his way through the early episodes of Season Four.

 

8. The Tomb of the Cybermen

The Doctor and Jamie holding hands. Shippers, to your keyboards!

 

9. The Web of Fear

Jamie and the Brigadier. Yes, your mancrush is acceptable.

 

10. The Invasion

The iconic image of the show's second most popular monsters.

 

11. The Mind Robber

The TARDIS explodes. The Doctor spins away into nowhere. Jamie and Zoe cling to the console. Jamie is somewhat less expressive regarding his feelings on the subject.

 

12. Spearhead from Space

He's from another era of the show, but Andrew Cartmel's comments are pertinent here: “We went to see John and said, What about tentacles? They could come out through the ventilation grilles. And he said 'Tentacles are difficult', spoken with the knowing manner of a man who's tried tentacles before.”

 

13. Inferno

The sight of the planet screaming out its rage.

 

14. The Daemons

If you show this image to anyone who hasn't seen The Daemons and they don't immediately want to watch it, then there's something wrong.

 

15. The Sea Devils

The Doctor and the Master have a fight in a high security prison that somehow has conveniently located swords at the ready.

 

16. Carnival of Monsters

A monster.

 

17. The Green Death

The Doctor drives off into the sunset. The end of the Pertwee era is nigh.

 

18. Genesis of the Daleks

"Back on Skaro, where it all began."

 

19. The Seeds of Doom

A slightly bigger monster.

 

20. The Deadly Assassin

If you to show this image to anyone who you've just shown The Daemons to and they don't immediately want to watch The Deadly Assassin, there's something wrong.

 

21. The Talons of Weng Chieng

Henry Gordon Jago, Professor Litefoot and the TARDIS.

 

22. City of Death

The most important punch in history.

 

23. Creature from the Pit

If you think this one looks odd, you should know we've gone for the PG-rated version.

 

24. The Horns of Nimon

It is he, Soldeed.

 

25. Shada

The Fourth Doctor, lying on a patch of concrete, enjoying himself enormously.

This article is continued on the next page. We don't like splitting our lists like this, but with the longer, picture-heavy ones, it does seem to make sense...

 

26. Four to Doomsday

The Fifth Doctor, interfering with monopticons, before he went hands free.

 

27. Earthshock

Adric is dead.

 

28. Warriors of the Deep

Almost the entire guest cast is dead.

 

29. The Caves of Androzani

Almost the entire guest cast is dead. Again. This time, however, the Doctor's friend is not going to die.

 

30. The Trial of a Timelord – Mindwarp

Colin Baker's Cliffhanger Masterclass (one from the twenty-one available).

 

31. The Trial of a Timelord - Terror of the Vervoids

How can you say 'no' that face?

 

32. Delta and the Bannermen

The Two Sides to the Seventh Doctor #1 – brooding melancholy.

 

33. The Greatest Show in the Galaxy

The Two Sides to the Seventh Doctor #2 – Genocide? What genocide? I couldn't hear any genocide over the sound of the massive explosion I just caused.

 

34. Survival

'Where to now Ace?'

'Home.'

'Home?'

'The TARDIS.'

'Yes. The TARDIS.'

 

35. The TV Movie/Doctor Who

Everything in this image is utterly joyous.

 

36. The End of Time Part Two

Either some godlike beings have been careless with their frisbees, or something's gone really terribly wrong.

 

37. Rose

The Three Stages of Eccles #1 – morbid aloofness.

 

38. Dalek

The Three Stages of Eccles #2 – pure radge.

 

39. The Parting of the Ways

The Three Stages of Eccles #3 – recovery and acceptance.

 

40. School Reunion

Just in case this fails to move you, in a minute K9 turns up, and he's wagging his tail.

 

41. Army of Ghosts

The Shipping Forecast: Earth to Void; variable, occasional weeping.

 

42. Utopia

If you show this image to anyone who you've just shown The Daemons and The Deadly Assassin to and they don't immediately want to watch Utopia, there is also something wrong.

 

43. Journey's End

David Tennant without any clothes on, pulling a funny face (70% atypical). It's so sexy the TARDIS has caught fire.

 

44. Journey's End

One of the bits everyone remembers from Journey's End, as the TARDIS crew of the past four series celebrate saving the day together. Ten minutes later the Doctor ends the episode in his ship, totally alone.

 

45. The End of Time Part Two

Bernard Cribbins Sadness Porn: You will cry because Bernard Cribbins is crying, and Bernard Cribbins is lovely.

 

46. The End of Time Part Two

And a new man walks away (like a drunken giraffe)...

 

47. The Big Bang

The Doctor tells Amelia Pond a bedtime story, as under Steven Moffat Doctor Who becomes a contemporary fairy tale.

 

48. Day of the Moon

The Pond family and Canton Everett Delaware III look out over Lake Silencio, as the huge great spoiler goes on its final journey.

 

49. The Crimson Horror

The Paternoster Gang, Clara, and the Doctor look on at the final moments of Mr Sweet.

 

50. The Name of the Doctor

Steven Moffat couldn't have set the internet more aflame if he'd recast Paul McGann as the Rani.

 

Originally, this was fifty screengrabs, but that's the thing about Doctor Who, it keeps happening. Because it wouldn't be Doctor Who if things didn't change, here are some surprise additions to our line-up:

 

The Day of the Doctor

“All thirteen.”

 

The Day of the Doctor

“I'm only a humble curator.”

The Time Of The Doctor airs on Christmas Day at 7.30pm on BBC One.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing! 

Disqus - noscript

No regeneration images?

Fast & Furious 7 delayed until 2015

$
0
0
NewsSimon Brew12/23/2013 at 7:59AM

Universal is pushing Fast & Furious 7 back to April 2015, Vin Diesel has revealed...

A piece of news that's hardly surprising, all considered. The horrible, tragic death of Paul Walker at the end of November was always going to make the planned July 2014 release date of Fast & Furious 7 virtually impossible to hit. Universal shut down production quickly, both to work our what to do next and to allow those involved with the films to come to terms with Walker's death. And the news has now come via Vin Diesel that the release date of the movie has been formally pushed back to 2015.

Fast & Furious 7 will now be released on April 10th 2015. Diesel posted the news on his Facebook feed, along with a picture featuring Walker, which he noted was "the last scene we filmed together". You can see that image at the top of this article.

Paul Walker will also be appearing in Fast & Furious 7 too. The movie is being reworked around footage already shot.

You can find Vin Diesel's Facebook mail here.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Lone Survivor: Interview with Mark Wahlberg, Eric Bana, Emile Hirsch and Taylor Kitsch

$
0
0
InterviewMatthew Schuchman12/23/2013 at 7:59AM

The tragic story of SEAL Team 10 and Operation Red Wings is hitting the big screen this Christmas. We talk to the cast.

When attempting to tell any “true story” on film, there is always an obligation to responsibility placed on artists and filmmakers to get it right. But when that true story is the 2005 events of Operation Red Wings, SEAL Team 10’s tragic attempt to take out a Taliban leader resulting in the death of four of the five SEALs involved, that obligation becomes a heavy burden. 

Based on the titular lone survivor’s book, SO2 Marcus Luttrell, of the same name, Lone Survivor is the culmination of director Peter Berg trying to tell this story for six years. And he finally did that by assembling a strong cast to recount the harrowing story, including Mark Wahlberg as Luttrell, Taylor Kitsch as Lt. Michael P. Murphy, Eric Bana as LCDR Eric S. Kristensen, Emile Hirsch as SO2 Danny Dietz and Ben Foster as SO2 Matthew Axelson. 

It was in promotion of that story that Wahlberg, Hirsch, Bana and Kitsch sat down with us earlier this month. 

There is an emotional and physical toll that must have been on all of you. I’m wondering, with the families, how did they embrace you? Did you become like their adopted sons?

Emile Hirsch: [Danny Dietz’s] mother, Cindy, she actually jokes to me and calls me her adopted son now. Dan Senior, Dan’s father, says the same thing. Getting to know them and getting to visit with them, to hear their thoughts about their son has been a very special experience. We’re going to Denver on the twelfth and we’re going to do a big family screening. I’m really looking forward to that. I feel like getting to know the families has been a real privilege and an honor for all of us. Aside from being really wonderful people, they’re also really smart. They’re great people.

Taylor Kitsch: A week before we hit camera, I got to meet Dan Murphy, Mike’s father, and it’s been an amazing relationship to today. We e-mail back and forth. He’s been amazingly supportive, from that first dinner – from the first time I met him. I finally met the rest of Murph’s family at the premiere. Like Emile is doing now, I’m going to Long Island on Monday. It’s going to be an amazing night. The whole family, a lot of Murph’s longtime friends, the fire department, the police… It’s going to be a special evening. 

Mark Wahlberg: Marcus doesn’t like me at all [Laughs]. No. For me, obviously, I had the good fortune of meeting the guy I was playing and spending time with him, having him kind of be there throughout the entire process and helping me with anything that I wanted or needed. He’s a very special individual. I wanted to know him and see the kind of man that he is. I’m certainly inspired to be a better man because of him.

There’s an intense scene in the movie where you rope down a cliff; it was crazy. How did you physically prepare for that?

MW: …Originally this was going to be a big budget movie so we would have had cables and green screens. But we did the movie for a price and that’s why I think it feels so intimate and real and authentic. The first stuntman to go down the cliff, when he landed on the bottom of the cliff, he was right on to the stretcher and right to the hospital. But everybody was there. The SEALs were there, so there was immense pressure to stand up and be a man, because everybody was really pumped. But, you know, we just did what was required. There were bumps and bruises, but we wanted it to feel real. It seems like it’s all been done before, but something so simplistic as that has an impact, because it’s pretty damn real. Because we have such a short amount of time as well, we have two units going at all times. If you were with second unit – our second unit director was the stunt coordinator – you’d be doing a lot of action stuff. The falls or certain parts of a gun battle. Then I would run back off to Pete, and we’d be in the village doing that stuff. It was kind of all over the place. So a lot of times you’re going to get your ass kicked. You knew it was going to happen, but every day it was rough. It was never about one individual; It was about telling those guys’ stories.

What is the emotional approach to playing a character that is real, as opposed to fictional?

EH: For me, playing Danny, some of those later scenes where he’s kind of on his last legs—the fact that I had talked to his mother and his father and his brother and his sister and his friends, and I heard so many great stories about him, I’d seen video of him—I knew how much people really loved him. When someone touches you in that way, there’s so much reality to that, and you have so much empathy for a person. I feel like that really influences you in such a strong way. You’re not like trying to find an emotion or something like that, because that’s already there. Your heart has already been filled up. You’re just doing a scene, and it’s so real because it is so real. You learn about what this person’s like. It’s hard to describe. You’re not trying to find some artificial way… You’re not thinking about the time your puppy got hit by a car or something like that.

TK: I’d echo the same thing. Knowing the families… Actually, a lot of those days, you’re trying to suppress it, because you get caught up pretty easily. Being opposite great actors too always helps. 

EH: One thing I’d also add is that having the SEALs on set at all times, as well. And they have all had friends that have fallen. We would do scenes sometimes and Mark would do something, I would do something, Taylor would do something, and the SEALs themselves, you could just see it on their faces—how real it was for them, and how emotionally affected they were. It was such a reminder that this isn’t some action sequence to them. These are some of the hardest moments, emotionally, of these guys’ lives.

TK: [Peter Berg’s] process is a very enabling process for the actors. You’re so embedded in these characters that the trust is prevalent. Mark could improv something that could just pull something out of you right there that you weren’t ready for that will invoke something very, very, real. That really helped us as well.

This film really meant a lot to me. I saw it last night. I have a friend who has served in Afghanistan as a medic and you guys really nailed it. Thank you. Mr. Luttrell just told us how he sort of treated you guys like Navy SEALs and sort of put you through your paces. Do you think that any of you would actually go through real SEAL training? 

Eric Bana: Which sucker is going to go first?

MW: I’m 42 years old so… As a man, I don’t want to sit on the bench; I want to be in the game. I would want the ball. So you would think. But it’s not a question of a physical ability. It really comes down to that mental toughness that I think sets those guys apart from a lot of other guys who can’t get through the training and graduate. So I don’t know. I have no idea.

EB: Marcus tells great stories of when he went through that. You’d look around the room and I.D. guys who would get through, just based on how they looked. They’d just look like cage fighters. And there was a guy in the corner, where he thought, “What the hell is he even doing? Did he come through the wrong door?” But those guys would get through and the guys who looked like they could take on the world would wind up crying after one or two days. As Mark was saying, it really is so much of a mental thing. I think that’s what’s so fascinating, when you read about the training. They’re just made of something else. Marcus’s book did such a great job of making you realize how big that gap is, between most of us and them.

EH: Marcus also made a really good point, yesterday to us. If the government can find out what makes a Navy SEAL a Navy SEAL, there would be millions and millions and millions of dollars saved in this training. There’s no way, really, of knowing what exactly makes a SEAL. You’re bringing groups of the toughest of the tough guys together and they still don’t know. It’s a unique type of training that just filters the SEALs from the non-SEALs.

 

This movie is so unrelentingly tension filled. It’s just a draining experience for the audience. I wonder, for each of you, why exactly you wanted to do this. What is the story you felt you’re telling with Lone Survivor? The people I have talked to have had all these different reactions about what the movie is about. What was it about it that made it so irresistible? 

TK: This is a film that struck a chord with me on a very personal level. These are guys who are willing to put themselves on the line and fight for their country. To me, it wasn’t a political film. It wasn’t a film that was going into any kind of detail about the wars, or, “Should we be here? Should we not be here?” It wasn’t about that. This was about soldiers that were willing to give everything they had. The type of courage it takes to do that. Because, no matter what your opinion is on any one conflict, there are conflicts that need to be settled. There are ones that need to be there and need to happen. This is representative of the best guys that we have doing this. I think that guys like that deserve to be honored, to have their story told. We live in a world where there is a 24/7 news cycle. It’s so easy to have these guys be just another news story. I think this is an example of really taking the time to appreciate the sacrifices that they’ve made. 

MW: Yes, I agree. I agree completely. Well said, my friend.

EB: I was a really big fan of Marcus’s book. I’d read it some years ago. And when I heard that they were adapting it, they called me and asked if I’d consider playing Commander Christiansen. And I said yes right away, because I’m not only a fan of Marcus’s book, I also have a bit of a fascination with the Special Forces community. They are all amazing people.  They perform an amazing function. And not every film has this experience. We all make different kinds of movies all the time. And I knew going into this that this is one that would feel very different to make and feel very different ten years from now from the other films we make. That doesn’t come along every day. I think we all felt that there was that sense in this one.

MW: When I first heard about the idea and Pete asked me to do it, I said, selfishly as an actor, “What a great opportunity to play a showy part.” Then when I read it, I realized what the movie was about, my perspective changed. It was never about me after that again. It was really about the guys that we portray and every single person, both in front of and behind the camera, who felt that same thing. It was a very unique set of circumstances that I’ve never experienced as an actor before. Even when watching the film, I don’t think about what we did. I think about what happened to those guys and what Marcus was able to endure. To be able to survive and tell the story of his brothers, that was a very special thing. We were all very proud to be a part of it and we were embraced by the SEAL community and the military as a whole, because of everybody’s intention going in to make it a tribute, not only to them, but to everybody who has every walked into a recruiting office. It’s a tribute to their loved ones and anyone who suffered losses.

Mark, you said the film weighed heavily on you because it was so intense. You had your family close by on set. Does that help, when you come home at the end of the day and your family is around?

MW: Yeah. It does. It’s really interesting to hear Marcus and other SEAL guys talk about when they go home to their families and they can’t discuss what they do. It’s just like trying to shut off what they just came from. They’re on a special op then all of a sudden, they are at home and they’re taking their kids to school and they’re helping their wives make dinner. It’s always comforting to have your family there. They’re here now, which is nice. I asked if they wanted to come to work and they said, “Daddy, your job is so boring. Absolutely not.”

 

What was the most difficult part, in portraying these characters and bringing this real life story to life again? Do you know if that part with the duck really happened?

TK: I don’t know if there is one specific part. I don’t know. When you meet the father and you really get so deep within the community. Maybe it’s the pressure you put on yourself to make it potentially what it deserves to be. It’s really hard to pinpoint what it is.

EH: I think that one of the elements that was a challenge for us was, in the beginning, when we all first got there to training with SEALs. We were on a SWAT range in Albuquerque. When we first started working with the M4 rifle. The way the SEALs had it organized, we were training with live fire rounds, with these M4 rifles. So we were all blowing through over a thousand rounds a day of real bullets. I think that was just us jumping into the deep end and working with targets. It was a lot of fun, and we had it really quickly ramping up in intensity, because it was about a week and a half at the SWAT range. We all learned to trust each other really quickly because we had to. Everybody just had to be really on point, because these are obviously incredibly dangerous weapons. When Mark Seamus, one of the SEALs who was instructing us, said, “These weapons don’t just kill things, they destroy things.” They used the word “destroy.” They don’t use that word lightly. That was something that was challenging and also a bonding experience for all of us. We learned quickly that we could trust each other. And that meant a lot to us.

You all did an amazing job and I understand that you all read the book before taking on your roles. Did it alter you thinking on wars after playing these characters?

MW: I didn’t read the book before I made the movie because I had read the screenplay version. I’ve been in situations many times where you adapt a piece of material and you always feel like some things have been left out. I think we did a really good job writing the screenplay. I was completely submerged in the world and felt it so I didn’t want to then go back and read the book and start complaining about why this or that isn’t in there. I read the book after and I do feel like a lot was missing in there, but that’s how it goes. I don’t like war but I love soldiers. They’re not the guys who decide whether or not they’re going in and they don’t really care. They have a job to do and they go and they do it. Would it be nice to live in world without it? Absolutely. I don’t want any of these guys going out and risking their lives, but that’s what they do and that’s why we made this tribute to all of them. 

TK: It’s a heavy appreciation and it’s such a different level becoming close with Marcus and the whole community and still being close with a lot of SEALs now. You’re more connected so yeah, it’s definitely changed.

Can you talk about working with Peter as an actor’s director? I read that he was communicating to you through a bullhorn so I imagine that he couldn’t give you notes then? 

TK: He could still give notes through a bullhorn.

EH: I think the fact that Pete comes from an actor’s background, and I had a similar type of experience working with Sean Penn, is there is sometimes a lot more badass in the way that they can communicate with their actors. I think because they were actors, there’s not this ‘Oh I can talk to this actor and be really sensitive.’ It really cuts through a lot of the bullshit. There were times where if I were doing something that Pete wasn’t happy with, he would let me know very directly and very quickly. And he did. That’s something for me as an actor that I appreciate. Knowing he was also an actor, it makes that type of director communication really safe, and I’m ok with that. But he also was able to know when to leave us alone and to push us to improvise and to be in the moment and all those things you hope to be able to do as an actor. He has all that understanding already. 

MW: There’s no room for sensitivity up on the hill. You can cry like a baby if you want on the way down the mountain at the end of the day. Everybody loved that. Everybody was there for the same purpose and whatever we had to do to get it done, whether it was Pete barking at you or the SEALs, it didn’t matter. Everyone was there for the same reason and we’re all on the same team and trying to do something unique.

*** Images courtesy of Matthew Schuchman

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing! 

The Top 25 Must See Movies of 2014

$
0
0
NewsDavid Crow12/23/2013 at 10:19AM

We count down the 25 biggest movies to anticipate in the year 2014!

While 2013 still has many, many gems left to unfold this holiday season, there is no denying that in our current movie climate, eyes are already darting forward to 2014. After all, another summer is over and many of Hollywood’s next round of big budget spectacles will be glanced at long, long after that big blinking crystal ball in Times Square makes it cumbersome descent.
 
Thus, we at Den of Geek thought it would be as timely as ever to begin the countdown to 2014’s most anticipated titles and figure out what cinema has in store for us in the not-so-distant future.

 
ROBOCOP
Release Date: February 12, 2014
The first big studio release (at least for the geek community) in 2014 is an early Valentine’s Day present. Enter the touching love story of a man and machine who have an ass-kicking, killing cyborg baby named RoboCop in this remake. Directed by José Padilha, the reboot will attempt to win over even the most ardent skeptic with a slew of fan favorite castings, including Michael Keaton, Gary Oldman, Jennifer Ehle, Jackie Earl Haley, Michael K. Williams, Abbie Cornish and Samuel L. Jackson. Of course, the real star will be The Killing’s Joel Kinnaman stepping into the titular big metallic boots. The remake clearly wants to make the brand its own by taking a page from the Rolling Stones and painting it black. Fans will decide if it’s a success next February.

 
300: RISE OF AN EMPIRE
Release Date: March 7, 2014
A ridiculously long time coming, 300: Rise of an Empire burst back onto the scene with a killer trailer in front of this summer’s Man of Steel. While the film is unlikely to win over the many critics of the 2007 original, the follow-up, which is only produced and co-written by Zack Snyder, promises more variety, and hilariously exaggerated sex and gore with plenty of speed ramping. See naked glistening men fight by sea! See naked glistening men fight by land! No matter how one feels about its visual absurdity (or Frank Miller’s Middle Eastern politics) there is one fact no one can deny: this sequel has replaced Gerard Butler with Eva Green. Therefore it could very well exceed the one about dining in Hell or something like that.
 

 
UNDER THE SKIN
Release Date: March 14, 2014 (UK)
One to look forward to, just based off all the film festival buzz this year, is the upcoming "Scarlett Johansson is a Pod Person" movie. That's right, this is a psychosexual horror piece that appears to owe more than a little David Lynch from previously semi-retired director Jonathan Glazer (Birth, Sexy Beast). In this surrealist sci-fi, Johansson is Laura, an alien honeypot sent to Earth to gather information on our spiecies as she feeds on the men that she seduces. However, she eventually may grow to appreciate us, even as more of her kind come to invade our world. It may be a little bit Body Snatchers and a little bit Species, but this looks to also be a disturbing and hypnotic piece of arthouse terror most of all. While the only confirmed release dates are in the UK and Germany, we can gaurantee the "Scarlett Johansson is a Seductive Naked Alien Movie" will have a U.S. release and soon.

 
MUPPETS MOST WANTED
Release Date: March 21, 2014
If someone told you three years ago that The Muppets would once more be one of the best family franchises in Hollywood, you’d laugh them all the way back to the swamp. But as it turns out, it is very easy being green at the box office when you have such enduring icons as Kermit the Frog, Miss Piggy, Gonzo and the rest of the gang. Nothing beats a classic and Muppets Most Wanted promises more of that joy to come. With James Bobin of the 2011 picture, as well as Flight of the Concords, returning to the director’s chair, there is no reason that this should not deliver the goods again. Especially with new celebrity cameos/team-ups like Tina Fey, Tom Hiddleston, Salma Hayek, Christoph Waltz, Ricky Gervais, Ray Liotta and Danny Trejo.

 
NOAH
Release Date: March 28, 2014
The Biblical Epic is experiencing a Second Coming in Hollywood. Sure The Passion of the Christ made $600 million in 2004, but producers thought that meant viewers just wanted to see more Jesus stories, except with lions. Now a decade later, Darren Aronofsky (Requiem for a Dream, Black Swan) is leading the charge of changing that attitude. As the project he dropped out of The Wolverine to direct, Noahis a $130 million gamble on audiences wanting to once more see their favorite actors play Biblical dress up. If Charlton Heston could play Moses, why not Maximus as Noah? Also, with Russell Crowe and Jennifer Connelly cast, this marks a semi Beautiful Mindreunion! Now that is something to awe movie fans.

 
CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER
Release Date: April 4, 2014
For those who cannot wait for Avengers: Age of Ultron, Marvel Studios is happy to kind of, maybe, quietly give you just a taste of it next April. They’re sneaky like that. Based on Captain America’s most popular comic book story, Winter Soldier promises the return of Bucky Barnes (Sebastian Stan) in a supposed throwback to the 1970s spy thrillers the likes of which Robert Redford would star in. Speaking of which, it does have Robert Redford! But it also has the return of the Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson), fresh off being turned into a fan favorite under the tutelage of Joss Whedon, as well as Maria Hill (Cobie Smulders), Agent 13 (Emily VanCamp), and NEW superhero The Falcon (Anthony Mackie)! Plus, who doesn’t want to see more of The Avengers’ cycloptic BMF super-leader, Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson)?

 
TRANSCENDENCE
Release Date: April 18, 2014
When Wally Pfister announced his imminent retirement from cinematography (at least for now), cinephiles wept. Yet it was also a time to rejoice, for the man who lensed The Dark Knight Trilogy, Inception, and Moneyball was now stepping into the director’s chair. Frequent collaborator Christopher Nolan and Emma Thomas even championed his transition by producing this first feature, a star-studded science fiction thriller poised to impress. Will (Johnny Depp) is a computer scientist who is attempting to map the human brain with euphoric technology. But after tragedy, his wife Evelyn (Rebecca Hall) must upload his own mind into a computer. From there, it gets confusing. With a cast that also includes Kate Mara, Cillian Murphy, Paul Bettany and Morgan Freeman, Transcendencewould intend to live up to its title.

 
THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2
Release Date: May 2, 2014
Sony’s Spider-Man franchise has always had the best (financial) luck during the first weekend of May, a prime real estate spot that Spider-Mancarved out in 2002. With The Amazing Spider-Man 2, they seem poised to recreate history in the sequel to the 2012 reboot. Andrew Garfield is back as the adventurous webhead that must balance wisecracks and crime fighting with high school life, including girlfriend Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone). Yet, his life is about to get a whole lot more complicated as former childhood friend Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan) reenters his world, bringing father Norman Osborn’s (Chris Cooper) troubles with him. These may or may not include Electro (Jamie Foxx), the Rhino (Paul Giamatti), and a possible rumored green meanie to reappear as well. Also, featuring Felicia Hardy (Felicity Jones), director Marc Webb will have a lot to cover in this entry, but sampled footage online looks promising. Could this one swing the web-slinger to new heights?

 
GODZILLA
Release ate: May 16, 2014
Okay, the last time Hollywood sent Godzilla stomping over easily smash-able cityscapes, the box office and critical response was lukewarm AT BEST. But this 2014 effort should be different. For starters, the beast actually looks like Godzilla! With an impressive cast that includes Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Elizabeth Olsen, Bryan Cranston, David Strathairn, and Juliette Binoche, Gareth Edwards has assembled some serious talent to react to this giant monster movie. It is still unclear whether this final Warner Brothers and Legendary Pictures collaboration can outdo Pacific Rim, but having the big green guy back up from the depths and 40-stories high will be an event hard to pass up.

 
X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST
Release Date: May 23, 2014
It is a rare thing when the SEVENTH film in a franchise feels like the freshest idea ever. Emboldened (or inspired) by Marvel Studios’ terrific success with The Avengers, 20th Century Fox appears to be pulling out all the stops to give fans the X-Men movie they have long craved. Not only is director Bryan Singer of the first two still-loved films back, but so too is most of the cast from those flicks. Also returning are Michael Fassbender, James McAvoy and Jennifer Lawrence from the groovy 2011 prequel, X-Men: First Class. But best of all, everything in between those films, including two or three clunkers nobody can truly remember, are about to get erased from continuity with a time travel story based on the much-lauded Chris Claremont and John Byrne comic book that is still revered by fans to this day. If you’ve seen the viral marketing for the Sentinels, the alternate timeline and especially Peter Dinklage rocking a ‘70s ‘stache as the big bad, you know that we are in for a treat that could rival anything coming from the House of Mouse.

 
MALEFICENT
Release Date: May 30, 2014
To date, the need to revisit and “revitalize” classic fairy tales, particularly still adored from the Disney catalogue of the 20th century, has been a mixed bag. I doubt many were happy with either poor attempt at a Snow Whitefilm in 2012, and $1 billion or not, I have yet to meet someone who genuinely enjoys Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland. Still, there is something devilishly RIGHT about Angelina Jolie as Maleficent. Another reimagining from Walt Disney Pictures’ vault, the studio is taking what was by far the best thing in their adaptation of Sleeping Beauty (1959) and making her the center of her own fiendish film. Princess Aurora (Elle Fanning) is there too, but this movie will live or die on Jolie representing one of the great Disney villains of all time. And if 2012’s misbegotten Snow White and the Huntsman proved anything, it is that these live-action adaptations are so much better when movie star scene-chewing evil is drowning out the rest of the colorful production.
 

 
A MILLION WAYS TO DIE IN THE WEST
Release Date: May 30, 2014
Admit it, no matter what he did to Brian, you like Seth MacFarlane. Or you at least tend to like his projects when they are fresh and new. Otherwise, Tedwould not be the highest grossing R-rated comedy in the world. So, when he announces that his first follow-up will actually feature him in live-action--along with Amanda Seyfried, Charlize Theron, Liam Neeson and Sarah Silverman no less!--we are intrigued. The fact that it is set in the west? We cannot wait. The Western has set the stage for many a great comedy premise in the past, including in no small way Blazing Saddles. Granted MacFarlane is no Mel Brooks, but if he can deliver the laughs of Ted in the era of Sheriff Bart, we still may be in for a raunchy and politically incorrect time.

 
EDGE OF TOMORROW
Release Date: June 6, 2014
Everyone loves the movie Groundhog Day where Bill Murray must repeat the same horrific date until he embraces it. Now turn that premise into a war of alien invasion in which an inexperienced soldier must relive his death in battle again and again until he stops the space-aged scum, and you may have yourself a summer blockbuster. Granted, this will not be the first sci-fi film to experiment with such a premise (*cough* Source Code), but to be fair this is based on a pre-existing Japanese light novel called All You Need is Kill. Also, with a cast like Tom Cruise, Emily Blunt and Bill Paxton, it appears that killing will have a bit of a surplus too. Directed by Doug Liman (The Bourne Identity, Go), this picture could be a wild ride in alien fighting and time paradoxes redux.

 
22 JUMP STREET
Release Date: June 13, 2014
Comedy sequels are difficult, right Hangover? But if it there is one that is primed for a new adventure, it must surely be Jonah Hill’s comedic reimagining of 1980s teen show 21 Jump Street. In the 2012 film, Hill replaced Johnny Depp and Peter DeLuise with himself and a perfectly cast Channing Tatum. Between Hill’s hyperbolic condescension and Tatum’s wonderfully delivered deadpan, the two made for a great buddy cop parody in the midst of a high school spoof where everything unhip in the 1980s (or even from the 20-something leads’ 2005 days) is now as Twitter-trending as the latest episode of Glee. Depp and DeLuise even made cameos as their old characters before being humorously killed off. And it left the perfect hook for a sequel: Captain Dickson (Ice Cube) is so impressed with their unconventional, but goddamn results-getting success, that he’s sending them to college. What college movie clichés can they spoof now? Smoking weed on the Quad? Getting into collegiate sports? Being hit on by a TA? The premise naturally lends itself to a sequel that can reuse the same set-up without feeling forced...at least this time. See you soon on 22 Jump Street.

 
FAST & FURIOUS 7
Release Date: July 11, 2014
Some will likely suggest that one year later is too soon for another refined and cultured Fast and the Furious picture. Can I just ask: Have you been watching these movies? Multi-layered storytelling they are not. The real question is if James Wan, director of Insidiousand The Conjuring, can measure up to Justin Lin’s shadow after Lin resurrected the franchise from near DTV-death and into box office billion-dollar glory over the course of the last four franchise films. It is too early to know, but it should be fun to find out. As Wan has only improved as a filmmaker, just now coming off the best haunted house movie in at least a decade, the prospect of him trying his hand at action is intriguing. Plus, with Vin Diesel, Dwayne Johnson, Paul Walker, Jason Statham, and Kurt Russell there, this testosterone-driven vehicle will have plenty of pork to push it over the finish line in the latest souped-up customizable car.

 
DAWN OF THE PLANET OF THE APES
Release Date: July 18, 2014
It is still hard to believe that after all this time, Fox was able to so successfully resuscitate the Planet of the Apes franchise. If one can recall Summer 2011, it was clear that Rise of the Planet of the Apes was on nobody’s radar. Yet, the film turned out to be the biggest surprise of the season with great action and even greater authenticity thanks to a heartwarming motion-capture performance by Andy Serkis as Caesar. Fortune may favor the bold as Fox has again taken a step forward by doing the next film without the marquee name of James Franco. Indeed, superb character actors Jason Clarke, Keri Russell and Gary Oldman are getting to lead an ensemble that still sports Serkis as Caesar in a world where the Apes truly rule. And with Matt Reeves at the helm, director of the vastly underrated Let Me In, Fox again has a mystery box of a franchise film that we cannot wait to unwrap.

 
GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY
Release Date: August 1, 2014
August 2014 will kickoff with Marvel Studios’ riskiest and most intriguing gamble to date, Guardians of the Galaxy. With nary an official superhero in sight, Guardiansis a funky cosmic adventure complete with a talking raccoon voiced by Bradley Cooper. This movie could go sideways real fast, but under the watchful eye of cinematic deviant James Gunn (Slither, Super), this likely will be one of the more bizarre and entertaining comic book films made to date. However, will it find an audience? That level of box office curiosity leads us to our next anticipation…
 

 
TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES
Release Date: August 8, 2014
Nothing says “relaunch” like Michael Bay. The producer who turned quaint 1980s nostalgia like the Transformerscartoon and action figures into billion-dollar blockbuster destruction porn is now producing the live-action TMNTreboot. Hell, he even threw in reconciled leading lady Megan Fox if you didn’t see the parallel already. Directed by his buddy Jonathan Liebesman (Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning, Battle: Los Angeles), Bay’s new Ninja Turtles movie promises to be a departure from the many cartoons and Jim Henson original films, as the CGI adolescents are now fighting William Fichtner as the Shredder. This whacky redo is too intriguing to pass up from screening. The Turtles are back! Cowabunga!

 
SIN CITY: A DAME TO KILL FOR
Release Date: August 22, 2014
Nine years after the first one, some would suggest that a second Sin Cityfilm is at least half a decade too late. And yet, the thought of returning to Frank Miller’s freakshow world of B-level noir and hyped up comic book visuals—under the helpful eye of Robert Rodriguez, of course—is one that is hard to pass up, especially when much of the original gang is back together, including Bruce Willis, Mickey Rourke, Rosario Dawson, Jessica Alba, and Jamie King. However, a new installment also brings new faces like Josh Brolin, Jamie Chung, Ray Liotta, Jeremy Piven and Eva Green. Yes, Green seems determined to elevate every Miller adaptation in ’14, and this one is already off to a better start than the 300antics. It is unknown whether the movie can prove she is indeed a dame to kill for, but she and the rest of the talent will certainly be worth the purchase of a theater ticket.

 
DRACULA UNTOLD
Release Date: October 3, 2014
A classic never dies. It just rises from the grave, again and again. Yet for their fourth official attempt to unearth the Undead count, Universal Pictures (now partnered with Legendary) is intent on going back to the “origins” of the vampire. Yes, it is true that the connection between Vlad Tepes (Vlad The Imapler) and vampires was first made by Bram Stoker in his 1897 novel Dracula, but let us not quibble over details. In this Halloween-timed vampire flick, Universal time warps to the 15th century. After the fall of Constantinople, Eastern Europe is in a world of religious and cultural upheaval. Out of the darkness arises a Romanian Prince Vlad (Luke Evans) whose unusual story will inevitably take him down the dark and damned path of the Nosferatu. Complete with Dominic Cooper, Charlie Cox, and Samantha Barks as a succubus claiming men’s souls, this would appear to be the first mainstream vampire movie in ages worth looking forward to.

 
INTERSTELLAR
Release Date: November 7, 2014
Intentionally, we have avoided numbering this list. But it is an easy guess what would be in the top spot if we did: Interstellarmarks Christopher Nolan’s first original film after concluding The Dark Knight Trilogy. Set in the not-too-distant future, overpopulation and changing climates have turned Earth into an unsustainable hot mess with not enough crop or food to go around. In that context, a group of scientists and explorers set out through an inter-galactic wormhole to save humanity on a mysterious mission. Based on the research of theoretical physicist Kip Thorne, Jonathan Nolan and Christopher Nolan’s screenplay bends time and reality to explore the far reaches of the cosmos and the role of man’s survival in it. And with a cast that includes Matthew McConaughey, Anne Hathaway, Jessica Chastain, Matt Damon, Topher Grace, Casey Affleck, John Lithgow, Wes Bentley, and Michael Caine, this is THE movie to anticipate in 2014.

 
THE HUNGER GAMES: MOCKINGJAY – PART 1
Release Date: November 21, 2014
It all will be coming to an end…kind of. In actuality, it is very hard to end a franchise in our post Deathly Hallows world where even a single book can be dissected into two or three films. Still at the very least, the quality of 2012’s The Hunger Games and the hype for November 2013’s The Hunger Games: Catching Fire ensures that we’ll all be there to witness the dawning of the revolution in 2014. After the 75th Hunger Games in the upcoming sequel come to an unexpected end, Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) finds herself as the postergirl for a rebellion against the Capitol and evil Donald Sutherland and Phillip Seymour Hoffman’s tyrannical regime. Katniss will find friends and love interests (Josh Hutcherson and Liam Hemsworth) swept into battle while she is the face of a new group of rebel fighters cast as the woman-powered trifecta of Julianne Moore, Natalie Dormer, and Lily Rabe. Viva la revolucion.

 
EXODUS
Release Date: December 12, 2014
And the Biblical Epics keep on running. If you ever wanted to hear Christian Bale gruff, “Let my people go!” here is your chance. With Ridley Scott returning to his genre of choice, big, old epics, Hollywood is revisiting the Moses story with Bale as the leader of the Hebrews, Joel Edgerton as Ramses, Pharaoh of Egypt, and Ben Kingsley and Sigourney Weaver in supporting roles. Imagine the parting of the Red Sea under Scott’s direction and with CGI’s visuals. Between Crowe as Noah and Bale as Moses, the Bible has never seemed so ready for a lil’ fisticuffs.

 
TOMORROWLAND
Release Date: December 12, 2014
Very little is known about this sci-fi epic other than Brad Bird is directing it. Repeat: the filmmaker behind The Iron Giant, Ratatouille, and Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol is making a live-action sci-fi thriller. Also, it stars George Clooney, Hugh Laurie and Brit Robertson. Originally entitled “1952,” the project is about a boy inventor who embarks on discovering something in our shared collective conscious known only as “Tomorrowland.” Still, we already know that it had you at Brad Bird.

 
THE HOBBIT: THERE AND BACK AGAIN
Release Date: December 17, 2014
Now, the time has come to close out this list with what is (hopefully) the closing film on the Middle-Earth universe. Do not fret, for there will be many extended and alternate DVD and digital download cuts of this film to be released for when we are all upon the Western Shores. But until that day, we can bask in the final three hours of director Peter Jackson’s nine-hour adaptation of the 275-page JRR Tolkien novel, The Hobbit. In this closing chapter of the saga, Jackson has announced an attempt to bridge the gap between The Hobbittrilogy and The Lord of the Rings trilogy. Whether he succeeds or not is immaterial. We will all be there to bid adieu to this cinematic legacy.
 
So there are the 25 films to anticipate and expect from next year’s schedule. Agree? Disagree? Wish we had included something with a little more transformation? Let us know in the comments section below!
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Disqus - noscript

Nice list! Some of these I didn't know about, others I'm either dying to see or patiently awaiting the first critiques.

Cap, Apes, and Guardians are the only ones I'll hit the hardtops for.

Hmm, I thought Avatar 2 and Transformers 4 had 2014 release dates?

Avatar 2 has a December 2016 release date. Transformers 4 on the other hand does come out in June 2014. It just didn't make the cut.

Can't wait for X-men...and Interstellar. * tries keeping expectations in check *.

25 must see movies if you don't enjoy cinema and you can't learn from awful precedents, you should've called it. Half of the movies here are Uwe Boll-level.

I like the list. Agree with everything that I knew about and more

Understandably.

Wow just lie why don't you. Not one of those look Boll level. Not saying I am interested in all but Boll come on you can find something better than that to troll.

Had to use "must". That along with should or have to really turns me off from going to movies or reading or just about anything. Having said that, there are a number of movies on this list that I'll go see anyway in spite of your use of must.

Great List! Great article.

Good grief, they all look incredibly boring, a slate of losers. It is getting way easier to forgo cinema. I have no idea who Eva Green is, I hope she's that frog in the muppets flick.

Here's my list of must see (for me) for next year;
THE WIND RISES
THE GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL
MUPPETS MOST WANTED
CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER
ST. VINCENT
GODZILLA
X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST
NEIGHBORS
HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON 2
FAST & FURIOUS 7
JUPITER ASCENDING
GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY
GONE GIRL
ALEXANDER AND THE TERRIBLE, HORRIBLE, NO GOOD, VERY BAD DAY
THE INTERVIEW
INTERSTELLAR
TOMORROWLAND

And the so-so must sees;
Beyond Outrage
Open Grave
Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit
The LEGO Movie
The Monuments Men
RoboCop
Winter's Tale
Three Days to Kill
Non-Stop
Need for Speed
Walk of Shame
Bad Words
Stretch
Sabotage
Transcendence
Chef
Maleficent
Edge of Tomorrow
22 Jump Street
Transformers: Age of Extinction
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
Hercules (Dwayne Johnson Version)
Tammy
Sex Tape
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
The Expendables 3
Search Party
The Judge
Fury
The Secret Service
The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1
Horrible Bosses 2
Exodus
The Hobbit: There and Back Again
Into the Woods

I have to agree with Javier. These movies by-and-large look awful. I remember when I could get legitimately excited about a superhero movie; now I groan every time and think of all the sheeple that throw money at this uninspired stuff. But then again, these are the same people who allowed 6 Fast and Furious movies to be made, and are probably eagerly awaiting the 7th, so I can't really be surprised.

After that trailer, is xmen DOFP up there now? It looks amazing.

The shorter and more honest version: Noah, Transcendence, X-Men, Interstellar.

Why do I have a feeling Noah is gonna involve a LOT of unconvincing CGI animals?

No love for Mad Max: Fury Road?

defently 30 movies im looking forward to see in 2014 are
1-Guardians Of The Galaxy
2-Captain America: The Winter Soldier
3-Amazing Spider-Man 2
4-X-Men: Days Of Future Past
5-Run All Night with Liam Neeson(one reason cause im an extra for the film)
6-A Million Ways To Die In The West
7-Horrible Bosses 2
8-Dumb and Dumber Too
9-22 Jump Street
10-Transformers: Age Of Exinction
11-Blended
12-Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
13-Need For Speed
14-Night At The Museum 3
15-The Cobbler
16-Alexander and the terrible, no good, very bad day
17-Into The Woods
18-The Hunger Games: Mockingjay part 1
19-Jersey Boys
20-Fast and Furious 7
21-Interstellar
22-Sin City: A Dame To Die For
23-Godzilla
24-The Interview
25-Vampire Academy
26-Men, Women & Children
27-Leprechaun: Origins
28-Poltergeist
29-Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes
30-A Haunted House 2

No love for How to Train Your Dragon 2, either? Dang man...

Thanks

no. No I do not like Seth MacFarlane

Moved to may 2015 in slot star wars moved out of

Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>