Quantcast
Channel: Movies – Den of Geek
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live

Anna Paquin Cut from Days of Future Past

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/23/2013 at 11:15AM

Rogue actress Anna Paquin has been cut from May's upcoming X-Men: Days of Future Past!

Despite being one of the main entry characters for audiences into Bryan Singer’s version of the X-Men Universe, Anna Paquin’s Rogue will be missing from the “reunion” film that is X-Men: Days of Future Past, because Singer revealed Sunday that she has been cut from the part.
 
While speaking to Entertainment Weekly, the once and future director of all things mutant disclosed that Rogue (Paquin) was only scheduled to appear in one scene, and due to the process of editing the movie for a certain length and pace, that scene has been deleted from the final film.
 
“Through the editing process, the sequence became extraneous,” Singer told EW. “It’s a really good sequence and it will probably end up on the DVD, so people can see it. But like many things in the editing process, it was an embarrassment of riches, and it was just one of the things that had to go. Unfortunately, it was the one and only sequence Anna Paquin was in, the Rogue character was in. Even though she’s in the materials and part of the process of making the film, she won’t appear in it.”
 
However Singer stressed that it has nothing to do with the actress’ work in the scene, as she was at one point a crucical part of his vision in the original 2000 X-Men. “She did a fantastic job,” Singer insisted. He also said she understood the decision as a creative one. Perhaps he can make amends with a bigger part in X-Men: Apocalypse...
 
X-Men: Days of Future Past is released on May 23, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

The Secret Life of Walter Mitty, Review

$
0
0
ReviewDavid Crow12/23/2013 at 11:20AM

Ben Stilller's newest effort is beautifully wrought and surprisingly sly, but proves more aloof than its title character.

In a world with so many various forms of diversion and multimedia entertainment, finding time to live in one’s own head can be difficult. Indeed, when the whole of the global community—not to mention your emails, bank statements and Facebook—is sitting in your pocket, it is a perversity to be distracted. Perhaps that is why Ben Stiller so ambitiously attempts to analyze the legendary Secret Life of Walter Mitty in this latest adaptation of the James Thurber classic. It is also probably why that “secret life” is now more akin to a weekend hobby.
 
The Secret Life of Walter Mitty was an ode to the hopeless romantics, or just the hopeless, when originally created in 1939. As a short story about a man trying to escape his domineering wife, Hollywood etiquette (probably) wisely changed the pestering to that of an overbearing mother in the 1947 film adaptation starring Danny Kay, who got out from under her thumb when his singing fantasies collided with a wise guy reality. However, Stiller, always the funnyman, intriguingly goes for something a little more lyrical and somber in his ambitious, fifth directorial effort. It attempts to explain why Walter would listlessly retreat into his imagination, and in the process creates one of the most visually beautiful films of the year. Unfortunately, it can also prove to be more aloof than any iterations of its hero.
 
In 2013, Walter Mitty is no longer meek or foppish, but painfully introverted after a family tragedy from his youth. He lives for his work as the man responsible for processing negatives at Life Magazine, but who ironically has no life of his own. Instead, he vicariously imagines the worlds perused by Life'schief photographer, the enigmatic Sean O’Connell (Sean Penn), and pines from a distance for the magazine’s newest employee, Cheryl (Kristen Wiig).

 
Unlike previous iterations, Walter Mitty does not escape to his secret life to avoid reality, but to rationalize the emptiness of his own. Ultimately, all of his fantasies are about getting Cheryl, or at least his own back with a nasty “transitional” boss played with supreme smugness by Adam Scott. This Secret Life of Walter Mitty is not the story of a man who lives in other worlds, but of one who is finally coming to accept the wonders of our own.
 
The movie is forced to tow an unenviable position of trying to pay homage to its source material, as well as the cinematic heritage of the 1947 iteration, while being an entirely different premise. Crafted around a pitch by screenwriter Steve Conrad, this is a film about a man coming out of his shell. Consequentially, the more fascinating influences coming from this mid-20th century fiction are out of the movie’s unabashed celebration for the workingman, and the sense of community amongst 9-to-5 stiffs. Walter’s third act heroics stem from a desire to stop the layoffs of an overzealous middle management villain, and have almost nothing to do with his comparatively tame mental vacations. The theme of the little guy versus corporate hegemony can be down right Capra-esque, complete with Ben Stiller as a would-be world traveler whose life was permanently put on hold when his father croaked. He’s just a little later than George Bailey at finding a Mary that makes it all worthwhile.
 
As the center of the movie, Wiig and Stiller have an affable rapport, which is crucial when one can nearly count their number of scenes upon a single hand. Every time Wiig appears, Stiller perks up along with the rest of the audience at seeing the talented actress play neither one of her demented SNLcreations or another 30-something neurotic. Despite Walter’s globetrotting adventures, theirs is a very nice, if underdeveloped, Manhattan romance in the middle of the picture, as clearly defined with the requisite walk through Central Park.

 
However, the movie only finds momentum during the second hour. After it has become evident that Sean has failed to package a negative, one that he swears in a letter will answer the quintessence of life, the fate of Walter’s job, as well as his one employee (Adrian Martiniez), will depend on Walter retrieving the bounty and putting it on the final cover of Life Magazine'sprint run. At this moment, the film almost entirely drops “the secret life” for one that is a cross between Nick Carraway and Indiana Jones. Mitty follows Sean’s trail from Greenland to Iceland to Yemen and to even Afghanistan. It is a lovely fairy tale that is almost as surreal as Walter Mitty’s daydreams. And it’s also far more entertaining.
 
By the third act, it is obvious that Stiller is most interested in pushing himself as a visualist and a storyteller who need not rely on movie stars in black face. And when his nebbish Walter is growing a five o’clock shadow and jumping into the North Atlantic while avoiding the fins of what are hopefully porpoises, his movie is at its most engrossing. Yet, even that is at arm’s length. The Secret Life of Walter Mitty rushes into its late love letter to life, which it views on a canvas far bigger than any of Walter’s earlier flights of fancy, because it must first go through the motions of a rather rote set-up. Stiller finds some meaning in these earlier acts with the quieter beauty hidden within the existence of the unremarkable, which he decorates in an impressive abstract palate that is a credit to Stuart Dryburgh’s cinematography, but that still ultimately serves as a springboard rather than a narrative. Incidentally, Walter’s daydreams are now far more run-of-the-mill variations on Jason Bourne-like fistfights with his boss and Spider-Man inspired feats of acrobatics (plus one bizarrely amusing David Fincher riff). If it is meant to be a satire of what mesmerizes us today, it is surprisingly wooden for most of its delivery from a filmmaker with other things on his own preoccupied mind.
 
Stiller succeeds at finding stunningly picturesque locations later in his film when Walter visits the less cinematically exploited lands of ice and snow to the North, as well as those in the Middle East. There is a clever, understated sense to the humor about introverted Walter climbing a giant mountain, which is only occasionally punctuated by self-awareness from the welcome phone calls of Patton Oswald (Walter’s eHarmony guru and sometimes-conscience) who’s carrier has AMAZING reception. Truly, Walter’s life is a far bigger fairy tale than the one inside his head. How could it not be when he exists in a New York that still has a monthly printing of Life and an appreciation for photojournalism? The bigger fantasy comes from the hero’s worldwide arc. Thus any segue into his own head becomes an annoyance and interruption for the viewer. It appears that in the 21st century, even Walter Mitty doesn’t have time for fables, even if he is living in a broader one.

 
The Secret Life of Walter Mitty features stunning visuals and earnest sentimentality that will likely endear a much larger audience than myself when it opens on Christmas Day. But for all its visceral aspirations, I am left wanting more of the film Stiller and Conrad pursued in the second half than the disjointed compromise they settled for on the whole. It’s still a pretty picture with a warm center, but the same can be said of postcards.
 
Den of Geek Rating: 2.5 out of 5 Stars
5

Disqus - noscript

Sounds like one for Blu-Ray, DVD, or VOD. Or Netflix Streaming...months from now :) I like Ben Stiller, and I always enjoyed the original short story. And I only sort of remember the Danny Kaye version. It definitely entertained me as a kid.

The Nut Job Presents: 'Twas the Nut Before Christmas

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/23/2013 at 4:20PM

The cast of The Nut Job deliver a new take on the classic holiday tale...

The Nut Job doesn't arrive in theaters until January 17th, but they've got a little holiday-themed fun here to help keep you going until it finally arrives. Behold, Will Arnett and the characters of The Nut Job delivering a little holiday cheer with..."'Twas the Nut Before Christmas!" 

In animated 3D, The Nut Job is an action-packed comedy in fictional Oakton that follows the travails of Surly (voiced by Will Arnett), a mischievous squirrel, and his rat friend Buddy, who plan a nut store heist of outrageous proportions and unwittingly find themselves embroiled in a much more complicated and hilarious adventure. The Nut Job also stars Brendan Frasier, Liam Neeson, and Katherine Heigl!

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Why 2003 Was the Last Great Year For Christmas (Movies)

$
0
0
FeatureDavid Crow12/24/2013 at 7:47AM

Every December brings new cinematic presents left under the tree, but we examine why the gifts of this Christmas Past still shine brighter.

The other day I was watching a Christmas movie, as one is wont to do during the precious weeks of advent calendars and (finally) appropriate holiday carol listening. During the film, the original A Miracle on 34th Street, I got into the trite idea of thinking, “Why don’t they make them like this anymore?” Of course after a minute, I realized that’s simply not true. Nearly every year brings new Christmas movie entertainment for children, families and even strictly grown-ups. And when we’re really lucky, the better ones will bring that warm glow that turns the year’s darkest nights into its brightest, finding even a cynical New Yorker begrudging good will toward men.
 
Nonetheless, I still got to thinking about how few of these movies have stood the test of time as true Christmas classics; magical adventures that become part of the holiday tradition like eggnog, the Yule Log, and 24 hours of A Christmas Story. When was the last time that we were blessed with a glistening cinematic ornament to place on the tree every year ever after? It dawned on me…2003 was the last great year for Christmas movies. Ten years later, there have been Fred Clauses and Rise of the Guardians, but none have been able to match the level of Fezziwig like glee found in these three vastly disparate presents from the Christmas some decuple years ago. So, like a late-night apparition, join us on this trip into a Christmas Past for three movies that still twinkle on the hearth for all audiences.
 
 
Elf
Release Date: November 7, 2003
 
Likely pitched to studios as another The Santa Clausethis yuletide goodie was a star vehicle for Will Ferrell when he was still an unknown variable in Hollywood equations. He had seen success the same year in the fiercely naughty ensemble piece Old School where his name was hardly any bigger than Vince Vaughn’s or Luke Wilson’s, and he was still eight months away from the classiest of movie star turns in Anchorman. So, it was essentially New Line taking a small risk on Saturday Night Live’s retired MVP to open a family film.
 
How surprising it was for everyone that Ferrell not only could lead a movie aimed at children, but that he could so completely understand them. Despite his penchant for appearing in countless films and sketches that require him to run naked through quads or mistake the words “San Diego” for “Large Whale’s Vagina,” there is a permanently optimistic innocence to Ferrell’s humor. Whereas many comedians find the funny from a place of cynicism or sarcasm, Ferrell’s endless string of comedies—whether he is playing a hapless sad sack or a raging 1970s misogynist—come from a place of sweetness and naïveté (or also stupidity). This allows him to far more easily transit into family fare that can elude his contemporaries, such as Old School co-star Vaughn’s 2007 wannabe Elf. Through Ferrell’s eyes, Buddy the Elf just wasn’t a caricature or parody of “elf” like tropes associated with the North Pole, but a sincerely earnest and hopeful hero who is just a little confused about the world. His wide-eyed performance gives Elf a heart ten times bigger than any other “Adult Comedian in Kid’s Movie” cliché.
 
And that is because Elf is not really a kid’s movie; it’s a family film. The distinction can be small, but it is a world of difference. Elf is more than a 90-minute babysitter with a few pop culture references for the otherwise bored parents. While Elf surely includes sly ribbings at everything from the etiquette of locker room shower time to the notorious stop-motion Christmas specials from Rankin/Bass, it’s still inherently timeless in its design by director Jon Favreau. The fast-talking star and writer of Swingers proves to be just as cinematically loquacious in Elf, which depicts Santa Claus as an aging blue-collar stiff who has had it about up to here with the lack of Christmas spirit in his old age. Yet at the same time, the movie never talks down the season or the importance of holiday cheer to its audience or characters; Buddy’s long lost father Walter (James Caan) being on the naughty list is an indescribable failing for the man to both Buddy and the viewer, and his redemption is just as important as the image of a bunch of New Yorkers being reluctantly coaxed into a singing of “Santa Claus is Coming to Town.”
 
But ultimately, the movie is just fun. It’s vibrant upbeat tone juxtaposed with a gray (though still big budget friendly) Manhattan offers more than enough environmental chuckles, as does its supporting cast, including stalwarts like Caan, Ed Asner, Bob Newhart, Mary Steenburgen, Andy Richter, and Amy Sedaris. It even sports new outstanding talent that would only rise in the coming years, such as blonde(!) Zooey Deschanel as Buddy’s love interest and an enticing caroler before New Girl’s Jess made her both a star and a typecast caricature for some. Also retroactively brilliant is seeing Peter Dinklage (in the same year as his outstanding turn in The Station Agent) steal the entire movie as Miles Finch, a quick-tempered children’s author who Buddy mistakes for an elf. It is easy to see why he would eventually be on HBO’s radar to play the endlessly nuanced and entertaining Tyrion Lannister.
 
Elf may have been designed as a star vehicle for an actor still testing his Hollywood image, but it has endured as a sled-based vehicle fueled on enchantment and wit as it travels down the seven levels of the Candy Cane Forest, through the Sea of Swirly Twirly Gum Drops, and then through the Lincoln Tunnel.
 
 
Bad Santa
Release Date: November 26, 2003
And on the complete reverse end of the spectrum for Christmastime laughs is Bad Santa. Directed by the guy behind Ghost World and the future writers of I Love You Phillip Morris, this was not intended to be the most feel-good movie of the year. That’s why it still was one of them. The antithesis of all the emotions in ElfBad Santa is a deceivingly mean-spirited approach to one of the big screen’s most infamous grinches. Played with the most delicate combination of self-pity and egregiously outgoing misanthropy, Billy Bob Thorton’s Willie is more than a Bad Santa Claus…he’s a horrible human being in every conceivable way.
 
The concept of a Bad Santa is not necessarily a new one. It always receives chuckles whether from A Christmas Story or Home Alone; the sight of a mall Santa not putting much effort into the job has hilarity that’s self-evident. But Thorton may be one for the ages, because he gets a whole movie to take it to an extreme worth 50 lumps of coal, all of which likely would smell better than his alcohol-drenched breath. A boozer, a probable drug addict, a jeeringly loud racist, and a sometime-criminal, there is nothing redeeming about this Santa at first glance. That is why his redemption story, told with maximum snark, becomes so poignant. Filmed from a mostly apathetic eye that never more than glides behind its dolly, Bad Santa is really the story of Willie and “the Kid” (Brett Kelly) who saves him. However, this is where the schmaltz ends. The reason the kid’s called the Kid is because Willie barely bothers to learn his real name. Their entire relationship is founded on Willie wanting to rob him when he hears that his father is in prison (“Is Granny spry?” Willie asks while slipping on the ski mask). Their interaction never reaches a genuinely tender moment, because the kid is played almost as pathetic as this harmless drunk. Overweight, ceaselessly spaced out and generally a product of low attention from his absent father and an even lower dimmed bulb in his head, this child would appear to be a lost cause. That makes Willie deciding to nut up and save him all the better. Sure, it ultimately ends with Willie taking two in the back from cops in front of screaming children while delivering a blood-soaked toy to the Kid, but it is the warped thought that counts!
 
This movie never loses sight of what it really is about: the world’s absolutely worst Santa Claus. Whether it is cursing out children with his beard off while eating in the cafeteria, pissing his pants while falling asleep on the job or making sure any lady that will join him in the changing room “won’t shit right for a week,” this guy is about as helpful to Santa’s image as Megyn Kelly on a tirade, and we love him for it.
 
Aided by sterling supporting work from late greats like Bernie Mac and John Ritter, as well as an especially acidic performance from Tony Cox as Marcus, “Santa’s Little Helper,” this is one that will allow the more wry holiday revelers a much-deserved smirk.
 
 
Love Actually
Release Date: November 7, 2003
What hasn’t been said about Love Actually? Marketed originally as a big ensemble romantic comedy from across the pond, many Americans had yet to recognize Richard Curtis’ name (they still don’t) or that this rom-com would grow into required December viewing. Sure, Love Actually’s larger-than-life love story has developed its critics for being…a larger-than-life love story. But ignore those Scrooges, because this enchanting winter fairy tale for adults still lives up to the hype it has cultivated over a decade.
 
Cast to the hilt with more British thespian talent than a Harry Potter picture, Love Actually is practically obscene for, among other things, its star-studded talent. Featuring an ensemble that includes Liam Neeson, Colin Firth, Hugh Grant, Emma Thompson, Alan Rickman, Keira Knightley, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Andrew Lincoln, Martin Freeman, Laura Linney, and a movie-stealing Bill Nighy, among many others, this picture is almost too big to stuff under the tree. That is probably why all the Hollywood attempts to copy Curtis’ near-trademarked “schmaltz” have failed utterly (ahem, He’s Just Not That Into You, Valentine’s Day, New Year’s Eve). Indeed, underneath this silky wrapping is a film that’s quite grown-up in its mentality if not its sentiments.
 
Not all of the stories in Love Actually are as cute as you might remember. Lincoln’s Mark is in love with his best friend’s wife—understandable when she’s Keira Knightley—and essentially has lost his “love story” before it’s begun; and that’s not mentioning the most awkward revelation for a love triangle in recent memory. Meanwhile, Daniel (Neeson) is undergoing the other part of life’s cycle that most rom-coms are too scared to touch: death. Also, it’s not only the death of a loved one, but of his still young wife whose cancerous departure leaves him alone to raise a stepson he initially can barely communicate with. Switching gears again brings about the dry and sweet, if intimacy-free chemistry between Rickman and Thompson (yes, yes, it’s Snape and Trelawny) that must come crashing down when he cheats on her with his secretary. Their marriage is not only loveless, it is lifeless and ends just waiting for her to pull the plug. Then, of course, is the one everybody remembers, Sarah (Linney), the woman whose storybook romance with a co-worker is subconsciously sabotaged when she repeatedly chooses to help her always-in-need brother over turning her phone off for one night.
 
These less-than-happy tastes of reality are few and far between all the caramel treats this movie leaves out for the proverbial St. Nick, but it makes them all the sweeter when doses of reality are splashed in the audience’s face along with the milk. It’s a lesson the Hollywood imitators never learned. So let Colin (Kris Marshall) shag every easy woman in America, which is apparently all of them; let the prime minister (Grant) shatter decades of geopolitical reality and diplomacy with the U.S. in its worst personification of a Bush/Clinton hybrid played by (who else?) Billy Bob Thorton, all in the name of love for his secretary (Martine McCutcheon); and let an aging would-be Mick Jagger type named Billy Mack (Nighy) impossibly win the prestigious “Christmas Number One” in Britain against One Direction’s forebearers! They’ve earned it, and more importantly, we earned it. This is especially true in the two subplots that serve as the bow and ribbon around the whole story: Firth’s Jamie and Lucia Moniz’s Aurelia meeting cute and learning to love each other despite not speaking the same language, and Neeson’s stepson Sam (Thomas Sangster) winning the heart of a fellow 10-year-old who’s so cool that she can stop the entire show dead for a musical extravaganza. The latter even lends itself to a big faux-Hollywood Graduate homage without the downbeat ending. This is Christmas, after all.
 
And that’s the movie’s biggest charm. Despite featuring swearing, porn stars, hedonistic rockers, and more subplots than there are verses in “Twelve Days of Christmas,” it’s still a movie that appeals to the jaded cynics and the true believers that listen for sleigh bells in the snow; both those who love Elf or the ones that prefer a little Bad Santa can enjoy this Christmas Eve feast. Sometimes crude, but never once crass, the ever-endearing Love Actually proves that a time for families and undergarments hanging on chimneys is also a period of romance and its own type of special, icy magic. It is the rare feat of having its red-and-green cake and eating it too. A decade later, it is still letting those good feelings flow to any viewer that has heeded the Ghost of Christmas Future’s warning.
 
These are three incredibly unique, disparate, and memorable Christmas movies that work just as well in 2013 as they did upon their release in 2003. They each have developed unwavering followings by the changing of the seasons and become increasingly entrenched as Christmas classics. Have there been any better since their release? Let us know what you think in the Comment Section below!
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

And don't forget Bad Santa's excellent bit roll as "Bad President" in Love Actually!

Love Actually is not a Christmas movie...it's a movie that occurs during Christmas

"If you really love Christmas, c'mon and let it snow;""All I want for Christmas is you;""It's Christmas, so I thought I would check...;""It's Christmas, so I'm yours;""Good King Wenceslas looked out, on the Feast of Stephen..."

Yeah, it's a Christmas movie. Complete with plenty of Christmas songs, and brightly lit red, green and blue colors. It's also one of the best made in the last decade.

it's complete bleeeeaaaah in my opinion. This is my favorite review of the movie so far http://jezebel.com/i-rewatched...

As the movie counts down to Christmas, the spirit of sincerest joy (schmaltzy or not) and optimism pervades every viewing for me. Of course, we all have different opinions, and I wouldn't be able to convince Ebenezer either. ;)
Thanks for your comments!

Lone Survivor Review

$
0
0
ReviewGabe Toro12/24/2013 at 8:53AM

Peter Berg's "one from the heart" Navy SEAL film attempts to honor the men lost, but doesn't seem to have the slightest idea how to do so.

The opening of Peter Berg’s Lone Survivor is candid footage of a Navy SEAL bootcamp. Triumphant music by Explosions In The Sky soars over handheld shots of these soldiers undergoing harsh exercises and rituals that ostensibly build and rebuild the body and soul. Except that a funny thing happens somewhere along the way. The yells become more desperate. The soldiers start to crack, falling down, failing to complete activities, running short of breath. The instructors respond with a series of insults and assorted vulgarities meant to motivate these men to get up, to respond with passion and intensity. The expectation is that the music will darken, the mood will grow somber, and these practices will be revealed as the cruel exercises in assault and battery that they are. By the time the men are tied up and thrown under water, held down by weights, I wondered if anyone in this footage was interested in building soldiers who still had recognizable characteristics, and not suddenly-wild animals.
 
Of course, who can argue with results? You don’t talk about Lone Survivor by attacking the armed forces or their policies. But the fact remains that the footage that is shown is chilling, topped off by the soldiers being reunited with their families during a gala graduation. Are they coming back changed men? Have they had their inadequacies removed from their bodies and minds? Are they recognizable? You can’t hear anything they’re saying on account of the score, but this is meant to be a moment of triumph, of conquests achieved. It’s only when the title flickers over the sight of a barely-breathing soldier, beat into a hamburger, struggling to live as he’s taken out of a helicopter and carted off-screen that you realize that this must either be a film about our armed forces, or of the systematic destruction of them.
 
The quickie thought is to believe it’s the former, given aggressively expressive director Peter Berg previously “did time” making Battleship, a film that flattered the Navy while generously pandering to a mainstream audience that wasn’t interested. That $200 million behemoth was his “one for them” and most believe this was his “one for me,” a passion project based on the first-person accounts of Marcus Luttrell, the body being carried off at the beginning. Berg is done lionizing these troops as he did in Battleship: Now he wants to break them down completely.

 
The narrative follows a small battalion running a surveillance mission in the mountains of Afghanistan, tracking a lethal terrorist. Before their mission, we catch them at their base, waking up, exercising, and generally looking like movie stars. Luttrell (Mark Wahlberg) and Michael Murphy (Taylor Kitsch) are the two alpha dogs, to Matt Axelson (Ben Foster) and Danny Dietz (Emile Hirsch), and we are allowed moments when they discuss the economics of buying a horse, the joy of Coldplay concerts, and women. None of it is very interesting and all of it feels like placeholder talk. Did Berg realize he was making a slasher film? The young strapping bucks are alive and tossing around a football with youthful enthusiasm in a movie where we know there’s only one survivor from the title.
 
A series of very basic miscues puts them in hot water: They end up pointing their guns at a local villager whom they consider may or may not be a member of the Taliban, or even in league with the terrorists. They tie the man and his two younger compatriots to a tree before deciding what to do with them. It plays like schoolyard bickering when all parties know they’ll yield to their superior, Murphy. The decision is made to let the man go, but soon bullets are whizzing past their heads. And in some cases, into them. An extended gunfight erupts, with the Americans on one side and an onslaught of Taliban soldiers on the other. The numbers are not in their favor.
 
The bullets growl through the scenes, and the puncture wounds are notably real and grotesque. This is a film made by people who have gotten shot, and the sensation of these men taking a slug or two from an unending avalanche of artillery is disquieting, certainly not fun. Berg doesn’t seem to have a consistent vision here. In some cases, he layers on the violence and these soldiers end up leaping tall heights, busting out full runs, and taking a couple of hot slugs. In others, the soldiers use their pinpoint precision to take out enemies one by one with a series of single shots that maximize bullets and minimize fuss. Except the enemy goes down with one carefully-placed bullet, but the Americans’ squad are able to withstand an almost comical level of violence; a moment where they go flying down a hill plays a lot like an outtake from the same scene in Hot Rod. Honoring Luttrell’s story is one thing, but keeping in mind that these men aren’t actually bulletproof are welcome.

 
When in doubt, litter the movie with violence. A third act reveal involves the kindness of strangers, but because the film seems so dedicated to the violence, we never really understand these relationships that emerge. Any quiet moment is extended artificially, bound to be pulled back and snapped by wild gunfire. It’s no exaggeration to say that the movie often feels like sitting down and being shot at for two hours, which is something of a victory for limitless believability and gravitas. Removing all the qualifiers that come with such an idea, we’re left with a movie about the deaths of several real-life men that seeks to actively discomfort the audience. Why? What’s to gain?
 
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
2

The Wolf of Wall Street review

$
0
0
ReviewDon Kaye12/24/2013 at 8:55AM

Martin Scorsese & Leonardo DiCaprio push at the bounds of good taste and viewers’ patience with their 3-hour orgy of Wall Street excess.

When we first see Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio), the CEO of investment firm Stratton Oakmont in Martin Scorsese’s The Wolf of Wall Street, he and one of his employees are hurling a midget in a Velcro suit at a large bull’s-eye planted in the middle of the company’s expansive trading floor. The staff members are screaming and cheering; money, booze, and female flesh is abundant. The scene truly resembles a depraved Roman bacchanalia  in modern dress, and the comparison of one dying empire to another is more than clear.

It’s just too bad that Scorsese and screenwriter Terence Winter (Boardwalk Empire), working from the real-life Belfort’s memoir, didn’t take that analogy further. The Wolf of Wall Street is, purely in cinematic terms, Marty in near top form: breathless pacing, on-the-mark editing (by Thelma Schoonmaker, of course), a selection of truly dazzling shots and a couple of unforgettable set pieces. But while he may enjoy spending three hours with Belfort – an arrogant a-hole of epic proportions who never really deviates from that description – the effect on the viewer is ultimately numbing.

It seems evident that Scorsese sees this film as a companion to his earlier classics Goodfellas and Casino in its depiction of the rise and fall of a human being operating on the fringes, if not all the way outside the lines, of morality and decency. Even the structure and formal esthetic – involving flashbacks, voiceovers, freeze-frames and needle drops – are the same. But the gangsters of those earlier films had more of a moral code than Belfort at his peak. They at least paid lip service to the ideals of family and respect, which made the dichotomy with their often vicious criminal behavior all the more stark. There is no such dichotomy here – what you see is what you get with Belfort and his associates, and even the collaborators at his firm are a mostly forgettable bunch with hardly the colorful charisma of Scorsese’s Mob members.

After that opening sequence, the film flashes back to a younger, more naïve Belfort, fresh off the subway from Bayside, Queens and looking to make his way onto Wall Street. His one defining characteristic is that he wants to make money, and he is quickly taken under the wing of half-mad, half-dissolute broker Mark Hanna (a loopy Matthew McConaughey). When Hanna’s firm goes bust after the crash of 1987, however, Belfort must start from scratch, joining a storefront penny-stock trading company on Long Island where he quickly makes a name for himself as someone who is so good he can sell shit to a sewer worker.

Belfort soon meets already drug-crazed Donnie Azoff (Jonah Hill), a furniture salesman equally obsessed with making dough, and the two set up their own firm. The first half of the movie charts their seemingly unstoppable upward trajectory, as Belfort enlists a bunch of his old neighborhood friends (who mostly just scowl or scream and include Walking Dead alumnus Jon Bernthal) as his initial staff and, before you know it, turns the company into a Wall Street powerhouse, raking in tens of millions of dollars and attracting the interest of a straight-laced FBI agent (Kyle Chandler) who correctly suspects that Stratton Oakmont doesn’t exactly play fair.

Meanwhile, Belfort trades in his hometown sweetheart wife for 100-megaton sex bomb Naomi (Margot Robbie), not that her considerable charms stop him from indulging his taste for hookers and some light bondage. And that’s not all he and his cohorts indulge in; they snort, drink, inhale, and pop every intoxicant and narcotic they can get their hands on, randomly veering from bouncing off the walls on cocaine to slurring their speech into a sludgy mess under the influence of Quaaludes. Belfort’s fall is inevitable and largely predictable, as the Feds close in and he runs the risk of losing his homes, his yacht, his fleet of cars, his family, his millions, and his drugs – but not his soul, which apparently left the building a long time ago.

As with David O. Russell’s American Hustle – which this also bears comparison to – the intricacies of Stratton Oakmont’s many scams are more or less left vague, with Belfort even turning to the camera at least twice to tell us that we don’t care about the details anyway (thanks Jordan!). Instead, everything revolves around drugs, antisocial behavior, sex, fighting, screaming and depravity, over and over and over again. Most of it is played for laughs and none of it ultimately resonates as more than Scorsese pushing his R rating as far as he can take it. The one scene that goes darker – in which Belfort beats Naomi and endangers their young daughter – is so different in tone that it feels like the director dropped it in from another version of the story.

Individual scenes are terrific: Belfort’s first meeting with Chandler’s agent on the former’s yacht is a symphony of awkward pauses and innuendo as Belfort makes a half-hearted attempt at bribery, while a climactic Quaalude sequence – involving the steps of a country club, a phone cord and a slice of ham, among other things – is a mini-masterpiece of drug-fueled idiocy. As for the performances, DiCaprio and Hill scream and thrash their way through the movie, both of them swinging for the fences and largely over them. DiCaprio does bring forth a sort of seething arrogance that makes this perhaps his darkest performance in many ways, while Hill finds new and entertaining ways to make his eyes bulge. Robbie’s thick Brooklyn accent cannot hide her flat line delivery and, physical assets aside, she is a far less interesting female character than either Lorraine Bracco’s Karen from Goodfellas or Sharon Stone’s Ginger in Casino.

I can’t say that The Wolf of Wall Street is boring, exactly, but its excesses wear thin over its 179-minute running time and fail to hide the fact that Scorsese really has nothing to say about Belfort, Wall Street culture, and the impact that both may have had on those around them and on American life. All the surface glitter and hilariously shocking behavior in the world doesn’t add up to much in the long run. Granted, if you want a completely serious look at the degradations of the financial industry, you should probably watch Wall Street or Margin Call. But that doesn’t change the fact that The Wolf of Wall Street is in many ways as empty as the lives and behavior it chronicles.

During the scene with the Feds on his yacht, which is docked at the back of the World Financial Center in downtown Manhattan, the camera shows that Belfort keeps his private helicopter on the roof of the boat for that extra bit of obnoxious extravagance. I realized with some surprise that I used to see that yacht all the time when I lived near the World Financial Center many years ago. I often wondered who owned a yacht on which they had the extreme self-regard to also park a helicopter. Now I know, and I can safely say that even three hours in his company is too long.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


5

Disqus - noscript

The yacht in the film isn't Belfort's real yacht, you twit. Your review makes it sound like you were one of those people who went to "Occupy Wall Street" and that you despise the wealthy.

This seems like more of a synopsis than a review, which is a shame because I don't generally read spoiler heavy reviews.

Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom Review

$
0
0
ReviewGabe Toro12/24/2013 at 8:58AM

In a time of reflection on the wonder that was Nelson Mandela, it's unfortunate that there is not a better movie about him.

Why do we make biopics? There’s no shortage of material out there about all supposed heroes and villains of history. Perhaps it’s the egotism of Hollywood, championing two ways of thought. One: something can ultimately be “legitimized” in the eyes of many as a movie. Dan Brown may have been loaded before, but it was the added exposure of a successful movie that turned The Da Vinci Code into a pop culture phenomenon. And two: there’s the race to be the single film about a certain topic in existence. Even dodgeball, a game played by millions, can get a “definitive” cinematic treatment courtesy of Ben Stiller. Thus enter Mandela: Long Walk To Freedom.
 
We’ve seen Nelson Mandela on film before, but it was either in an abstract sense, or focused on a specific period for the politician, like Morgan Freeman’s kindly portrayal in Invictus. Mandela: Long Walk To Freedom offers a more thorough meditation, which tries to show modern audiences that, yes, Mandela was once young.
 
The popular interpretation of Mandela has always been that of a benevolent, gray-haired man with excellent accented elocution in regards to his English. Without offending anyone (particularly the Mandela estate), Long Walk To Freedom emphasizes that he once used to fight and make love as well. Our pop cultural remembrance of Mandela is noble but, unfairly, square. It’s easy to remember that people who change the world are rarely squares themselves. Our first encounters with Mandela in Justin Chadwick’s new film emphasizes this man was a volcano, one who simply learned to control the flow of lava over the years.
 
Much of that comes from Idris Elba’s powerful performance. Elba is a beautiful man, with smoothly contoured skin and a soft smile. While he looks almost nothing like Mandela, his speech patterns are similar, and his thick-barreled chest helps spotlight the skinnier Mandela’s similarly broad shoulders. Elba makes Mandela into a bit of a sex symbol in early scenes – when his shirt comes off, it’s something of a revelation – but it fits with the idea of establishing that he was an outlaw, powering the African National Congress to take aggressive action against the government’s uneven policies and thinly-justified racism.

 
Mandela’s story is massive and unwieldy, and it’s unfortunate that the film basically hop-scotches around pivotal moments. His courtship of wife Winnie (Naomie Harris) is illuminating in the way romance and politics dovetail, as his seduction essentially radicalizes her, first towards his cause and later to a dangerous, more transgressive sort of violence. That relationship was covered ineffectually in this year’s Winnie but here, in Elba and Harris, you have two forceful, intense actors who could have carried that subplot into its own fiery film. Pity that Winnie’s anger eventually takes a backseat to Nelson’s more measured, respectful tone.
 
The picture barely has any time with the duo before Nelson ends up in prison, and the film feels hamstrung as a result. Long Walk To Freedom delicately observes Mandela’s subtle egotism as he walks into every room chanting his own call-and-response with followers. But when he ends up in his cell, he unleashes the call again, only to be met with silence. The loss on his face is almost nearly a relaxed smile, as if he’s partly relieved to be away from a country’s social upheaval for just one moment, while also noting his sudden impotence. As his time behind bars stretches through decades, he learns to find small victories within the margins, like a lessening tension between himself and his racist guards, or the dissipation of the arbitrary racism that puts white prisoners in long pants and blacks in shorts.
 
Unfortunately, aside from brief moments with Winnie, the movie doesn’t show what’s going on while Mandela is imprisoned. The soft-shoe approach towards the politics of the era is cowardly simplistic, assuming we’ll be satiated, as an audience, with Elba’s dulcet accent and kind eyes. What the ANC really want, and what the government is willing to yield, remains opaque. Frustratingly, when Mandela is released to negotiate peace with the government on behalf of the people, it feels like the movie is dancing around actually mentioning what divides the white and the black. This is probably best for the teachers who wish to spend a week’s time showing the 146 minute movie to classes, as it gives them very specific topics to teach afterwards, but for a full-length film, it feels inadequate.
 
By the time Mandela leaves prison, the world around him doesn’t even seem all that changed. More peaceful, perhaps, but that seems like a cheat by director Justin Chadwick, who tends to crowd the screen with child extras to emphasize a tranquil moment (and shoot them when he needs a bit of drama). Chadwick seems to relish the tensions amongst political families: when one of Mandela’s daughters visits him in prison and is instructed to avoid discussing politics in lieu of family topics, she snaps about how her family is based on politics, an obvious but meaningful move. What he doesn’t seem to understand is the idea of racism not always emerging from the same place. Many felt that the black citizens were inferior, but Chadwick seems to believe this was the prevailing notion. In fact, most who acted towards a cause that advocated racism did so because of money, families, and misplaced jingoistic pride; there are odious, upsetting reasons, but there are also human reasons that while still indefensible are worth illustrating. Not in this film.

 
When Mandela is finally running for office, the film has snowballed enough biopic checkpoints that it only needs to roll down the hill. Perhaps this is to distract from Elba’s elderly makeup, which sometimes has him looking like Sidney Poitier, and other times like The Toxic Avenger. There was a film to be made here for Mandela fans who only want the euphoria and intensity of the man captured for posterity, context be damned. The attempt instead was to make a broad, commercial picture, one that tried to present that aura for non-Mandela followers while merely half-heartedly committing to a milieu. Too glossy for Mandela purists, and too undercooked for the curious, Mandela: Long Walk To Freedom probably should have stopped somewhere and asked for directions.
  

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

4

Before Doctor Who, There Was Nigel Kneale

$
0
0
FeatureJim Knipfel12/24/2013 at 9:13AM

The pioneering British screenwriter helped make sci fi what it is today.

In terms of science fiction, Nigel Kneale may not be as immediately recognizable to mainstream audiences as, oh, Ray Bradbury, or Arthur C. Clarke, or maybe even Richard Matheson, but for that small circle of geeks who do know him, he’s legendary. If not for Kneale’s pioneering work in 1950s television, shows like Doctor Who and The X Files would likely have been very different, if they existed at all. It’s no exaggeration to say that he changed the very face and direction of science fiction, though it was pretty much all an accident.

He began his career in the late 1940s, reading his own short stories aloud on BBC radio. They were quite popular, but after the stories were collected and released as an award-winning book, Kneale decided to turn his attention to writing scripts. In 1951, after a couple of his radio dramas had been produced, he was offered a job in the drama department of the BBC’s still-fledgling television unit. His specialty would become adapting popular stories and classics for the small screen.

It was there that Kneale and director Rudolph Cartier agreed that the programs being aired on the BBC were too slow, too stiff, too much like filmed stage plays. They were just too damned British is what they were, and something needed to be done. Together they would revolutionize British television, and Kneale himself, over a career that would last nearly five decades, would become one of the most important and influential screenwriters in England—thanks in no small part to one of his characters, Prof. Bernard Quatermass.

In an era when scientists from Victor Frankenstein to Edward Teller were portrayed and perceived as evil geniuses, war mongers, or power mad maniacs unable to control their own deadly discoveries, Kneale created the rocket scientist Quatermass, who was rational, sober, and noble, whose only interest was in pure research and who fought to ensure his rockets were used as they were intended: for space exploration, not for blowing up commies. But pushy and cement-headed governmental and military authorities were only the beginning of his troubles, and compared with some of the other things he’d be encountering, a mere annoyance.

In 1953, Kneale and Cartier introduced Quatermassin a six-part, three-hour miniseries, The Quatermass Experiment. A radical break from the costume and domestic dramas that had marked BBC television up to that point, it was the first time anyone had dared present English TV viewers with science fiction and horror.

When the first manned flight into space (in one of Quatermass’ rockets) returns off course and off schedule missing two astronauts and with the remaining astronaut sick with some unknown disease, well, Quatermass has a mystery on his hands. What begins as a mystery anyway soon becomes a nightmare when the sick astronaut starts absorbing every life form around him and quickly devolves into some kind of alien blob that terrorizes London. As the creature continues to grow and eat people, it becomes evident that the blob poses a threat to the entire world unless Quatermass can figure out a way to stop it.

Despite the above description, it was an extremely intelligent, complex, and genuinely frightening story, with an undercurrent of philosophical inquiry. Not only did it represent something new for British TV viewers, it represented a new kind of science fiction film with a wholly new kind of alien invasion. These weren’t rubber bug-eyed monsters or men in funny spacesuits anymore. The Quatermass Experimentwas performed live before the cameras every week, and regardless of its low budget and lack of special effects it drew enormous audiences. Kneale knew how to use dialogue and character to drive a thrilling and terrifying story. At the same time, as so many had before him, he used the camouflage of a science fiction story to deal with contemporary Cold War issues, but in such a subtle and understated way that it was easy to watch the show as simply an exciting tale about an alien invasion and a world in peril, not a lecture.

Even on the simplest of technical levels, the show was something vibrantly new. The cameras moved, the acting was naturalistic, not stage bound, and even if the special effects weren’t great, they were trying. For the times, the show had real zing.

Two things happened as the result of the series’ success. First, the BBC immediately began nagging Kneale for more Quatermass, and (in an underhanded move beyond his control, he would later claim), the rights to The Quatermass Experimentwere sold to Hammer Films, who wanted to turn it into a feature. Both were realized in 1955.

Quatermass 2, again teaming Kneale with Cartier, found Quatermass once more confronted both with government ignorance and a sinister alien invasion. This time, when a shower of thousands of tiny but strangely aerodynamic meteorites falls across England, nobody seems to consider it anything more than a curiosity. Meanwhile, Quatermass has been having a devil of a time getting his latest rocket design off the launchpad.

Well, though, when these little meteorites start cracking open and the gaseous aliens inside start possessing humans, and those alien-possessed humans start building a secret factory in the middle of nowhere, Quatermass realizes he has another spot of trouble on his hands. In the end the only way to stop the bodysnatching and human enslavement is to head out into space in one of his own rockets.

Although they still had no effects budget to work with, the results were again complex, thought-provoking, extremely intelligent (with more quiet Cold War commentary), and drew even larger audiences than the original.

Meanwhile, Hammer released The Quatermass Xperment (the dropped “E” was used to emphasize the film’s X rating). Seasoned screenwriter Richard H. Landau had been brought in to condense Kneale’s three-hour script to a more manageable 90 minutes, Val Guest (who had never directed sci-fi before) was hired to direct, and American character actor Brian Donlevy was cast as Quatermass to help in the American distribution.

Kneale was, you might say, less than pleased with what had happened to his story. He was particularly upset with the choice of Donlevy to play the head of the British Experimental Rocket Group. In interview after interview he made a point of attacking the actor’s weight, acting ability, and drinking problem. (To be honest, those who had seen Donlevy in countless films prior to this might find it much easier to believe him as a brass tacks prison warden or DA than as a serious research scientist.) He was also upset about the cuts and additions to the plot and dialogue, and never fully forgave Val Guest.

(Sadly, comparisons between the original BBC production and the Hammer film are impossible, as only the first two episodes of the original still exist. Personally—Donlevy aside—I think Guest crafted a fine and atmospheric film that remains deeply creepy today. Hammer had the effects budget to put some of Kneale’s descriptions on the screen, and the monster in particular is especially effective.)

When the BBC sold the Quatermass 2film rights to Hammer, Kneale insisted that he be given the chance to write his own screenplay. Unfortunately for him this meant working together with Guest, who once more had been signed to direct. Worse, noting Kneale’s script was much too long. Guest made a few cuts of his own and rewrote some of the dialogue. He even completely changed the ending, scrapping Quatermass’ trip into space. (As Kneale would put it, Guest dumbed it down.) Even more mortifying, the chubby, drunken and gruff Donlevy would once again play the austere and brilliant Prof. Quatermass.

In the end and in spite of his serious misgivings with what the film became by the time of its 1957 release, including a changed title for the US market, Kneale would admit that Guest’s new ending was better than his own.

All their clear differences aside, Kneale and Guest would work together once again that same year on The Abominable Snowman, based on Kneale’s 1955 teleplay, The Creature.

A scientific expedition (led by Peter Cushing and a boisterous, loudmouthed Forrest Tucker) encounters what else but an abominable snowman. While at first the creature is taken as a hideous, vicious monster, what with all the dog and Sherpa killing, Kneale's script (as per usual) uses the creature as the focus of a debate about the nature of man.

This time around things were much smoother. Kneale’s original script was 90 minutes long, so no major cuts had to be made (though Guest trimmed some of the dialogue, feeling it was too talky). Kneale was pleased with the cast, many of whom had come directly from the BBC version, including Cushing (who had also starred in Kneale’s acclaimed adaptation of Orwell’s 1984). And the budget allowed for an escape from the constraints of a live production’s limited sets and special effects. (Kneale recalls that during a “snowstorm” scene in the original BBC broadcast, you could clearly see the stagehand with a push broom stirring up the sawdust that was standing in for snow.)

Kneale’s only major gripe was with Guest's insistence that the Yeti never be fully revealed. Kneale felt this was cheating the audience, while Guest wanted the audience to use their imaginations, as nothing he could show them would match the horrors they envisioned. In the final cut of the film it’s obvious they reached some kind of compromise, and one that works for both sides.

As with their previous collaboration, it was an extremely successful film, both on intellectual and aesthetic terms as well as commercially.

The following year and under great pressure from the BBC, Kneale revived Quatermass for what he hoped would be the last time with Quatermass and the Pit. The less said about the always-surprising story the better. Let’s just say it begins with the discovery of what may or may not be an unexploded German V-2 rocket at a construction site and evolves into another unexpected alien invasion, this time one that can be traced back thousands, perhaps millions of years.

It’s really, really something, and decades later would prove to be a direct influence on Chris Carter. Following the broadcast it was hailed as a highpoint for British television, and Kneale’s script is an undeniably brilliant one.

After the miniseries, he began dividing his time more evenly between television and features, as well as between science fiction and serious drama. Still considered a master of the literary adaptation, in 1960 he wrote the screenplays for John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger and The Entertainer, both of which went on to be considered classics. In 1964 he wrote a wonderful script with a neat bookending twist for a film version of H.G. Wells First Men in the Moon featuring the stop motion work of Ray Harryhausen. His original 1968 dystopian teleplay The Year of the Sex Olympics is seen today as a frighteningly prescient vision of a culture sedated by reality television pushed to its logical conclusion. Made a few years after that, his technological ghost story The Stone Tapes remains just as effective in the digital age.

In 1967, almost ten years after it first aired, he returned to Hammer Studios to work on the film version of Quatermass and the Pit, this time with director Roy Ward Baker and starring Andrew Kier, who may well be the best Quatermass of them all.

More than either of the other features, Quatermass and the Pit, in spite of its shorter run time, sticks remarkably close to the original miniseries. Baker understood and respected the material and used the resources at Hammer to bring it to glorious life. And Kier seems to breathe the role of Quatermass, an honest-to-god scientist who has somehow once again found himself caught between lunkheaded military officials, a public that won’t listen, and a wholly unexpected kind of alien invasion. Along the way Kneale slips in some awfully provocative thoughts about the origins and nature of mankind, but as has always been the case in his work, he’s not ham-fisted and dreary about it; he lets the facts of the story and the developing plot make his points for him. Screw that though. The film scared the shit out of me when I was a kid and it scares the shit out of me now. I love all the Quatermass films, but this is the best of the lot.

For the next ten years he returned to television, writing for several series across several genres, all the while resisting the requests to bring Quatermass back. Professor Quatermass, he said, had already saved the world three times, and that’s enough.

But in 1979 he returned one last time with a sprawling, big budget miniseries starring John Mills and entitled simply Quatermass. This time the professor finds himself in a dystopian future in which England is overrun with gangs, the economy has collapsed, and an alien force of some kind is reducing large groups of smelly New Age hippies to a fine white powder. However much some of us might want to encourage Quatermass to just stay the hell out of it this time, just let the aliens go about their business (I mean, why mess with a good thing, right?), the good doctor feels it’s his duty to figure out what’s happening and stop it if he can. While attempting to uncover the nature of the mystery, we learn a great deal about Quatermass’ private life—something that had been missing from all the other films.

In a move he later admits was a mistake from the beginning, Kneale was asked to write a miniseries that could easily be cut down directly to 100 minutes for a ready-made theatrical release. While the original version was no less intelligent and multi-layered as any of the others, the chopped down film version (released as The Quatermass Conclusion) was a confounding mess, essentially a collection of scenes from the original strung together with little thought to story or character.

Kneale himself expressed his dissatisfaction with both the long and short versions, this time taking the responsibility himself, admitting the story didn’t work the way he wanted it to. In a 1992 radio piece, The Quatermass Memoirs, he all but ignores the very existence of the fourth entry. Yet interestingly enough, his only novel—released in 1979 to coincide with the airing—was in fact a novelization of Quatermass.

In 1982 he was approached by John Carpenter and Debra Hill to write a film they were producing. It was their attempt to reclaim the Halloween franchise and return it to its original concept, as a series of unique, unrelated films connected only by the common Halloween theme. At the time, Joe Dante was signed on to direct. What they wanted from Kneale for Halloween III: Season of the Witch was a story about witchcraft in the computer age. What they got was a wild conspiracy horror story about an evil Irish toymaker who, using a stolen chunk of Stonehenge, wants to celebrate Halloween the way his ancestors did, namely by killing millions of children with booby-trapped Halloween masks triggered by a TV signal.

Well, Dante left the project and Carpenter regular Tommy Lee Wallace took over as director. Wallace rewrote the script, Carpenter rewrote the script, and although Wallace insists the final shooting script was 60 percent Kneale, Kneale demanded his name be removed as the rewrites added too much gore and had once again oversimplified his story. Today Wallace gets the sole screenwriting credit, but has said time and again that he doesn’t deserve it.

With the great Dan O’Herlihy as the evil toymaker and Tom Attkins as a doctor who stumbles across the conspiracy (one that involves Irish robots, even!), it’s a neat, tight and completely insane little horror thriller. It was also absolutely savaged by critics and audiences alike upon its release for not being another movie about Michael Myers and a knife. In any case, to four or five of us anyway Halloween IIIremains the only film in the franchise worth caring about. And we still can’t get that fucking Silver Shamrock commercial jingle out of our heads.

After that Kneale continued to write for television, a medium he had livened up considerably, with only occasional forays into film, and a good deal of his work still garnered the highest praise. He turned down a number of jobs with shows he had directly inspired, including Doctor Who and The X Files. In 2005 he acted as a consultant when his original script for The Quatermass Experiment was resurrected and once again broadcast live on British TV. Fittingly, it was the last project he would be involved in, dying two years later at the age of 87. But his influence and extraordinary imagination—and the influence and imagination of Bernard Quatermass—is still quite evident today in both England and the States, on television and in films, in all of Chris Carter’s projects, in the films of Larry Cohen and John Carpenter, and to be honest in damn near everything I’ve ever written.

The sad thing is that these days, in this world he envisioned and helped create, Kneale would likely find it virtually impossible to sell his original screenplays, as the powers that be would label him (as they would label Quatermass) “too quirky.”

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


August: Osage County Review

$
0
0
ReviewDon Kaye12/25/2013 at 12:42PM

Tracy Letts’ Pulitzer Prize-winning play comes to the screen as little more than a semi-campy showcase for some serious scenery chewing.

August: Osage County practically screams “prestige picture” (and that’s just the beginning of the screaming, trust me). Based on a Tony-and-Pulitzer-winning play by the red-hot Tracy Letts (who also authored the plays on which Killer Joe and Bug were based), it stars Julia Roberts, Meryl Streep, Chris Cooper, Sam Shepard, Benedict Cumberbatch, Ewan McGregor, Juliette Lewis and more in a story that seems on the surface at least to be almost straight out of Tennessee Williams. But as directed by John Wells (The Company Men) from Letts’ own screenplay, it ends up being Williams by way of The Rocky Horror Picture Show.
 
When a sudden tragedy reunites the three Weston sisters at their Oklahoma family home, the women find themselves confronting their own pasts – and possibly their futures - in the form of their monstrous, drug-addled mother Violet (Streep).  Barbara (Roberts) and Karen (Lewis) have both moved away; Barbara is married, but separated from college professor Bill (McGregor) with whom she has a 14-year-old daughter named Jean (Abigail Breslin). Karen is the youngest of the sisters and the wild child, having gone through a succession of men only to land with sleazy Steve Heidebrecht (Dermot Mulroney). And middle sister Ivy (Julianne Nicholson) has stayed in Osage County to care for Violet and their father, Beverly (Shepard), whose disappearance triggers the unexpected family reunion.
 
Also present are Violet’s sister Mattie Fae (Margo Martindale), her kindly husband Charles (Cooper) and their clumsy, weak-willed son “Little” Charles (Cumberbatch), there to provide support and comfort to Violet as Beverly’s fate becomes clear. But Violet is long past mourning for her alcoholic husband. Suffering herself from mouth cancer, she is pumped full of all kinds of painkillers and narcotics yet still possessed of a wicked tongue and – in her more lucid moments – a shrewd knowledge of the family’s secrets and an ability to manipulate them for her own ends.

 
I have not seen the play, but understand that this is an extremely faithful adaptation. Frankly, that shows. August: Osage County (which I saw at this week’s AFI Fest 2013) is mostly housebound (in the dark, drab Weston residence) and much of its dialogue stylized and arch. Every character gets at least one showstopping speech that’s guaranteed to bring applause in a theater setting but doesn’t sound natural translated to film. Despite the intimacy of the setting, director Wells has his actors playing to the cheap seats at the very top of the house. There are several all-out screaming matches in the movie- including a knockdown catfight starring Streep and Roberts – and most of the time the actors, especially the leads, chomp down on the scenery with much gusto and unintentional hilarity that could make this erstwhile tragedy into a camp classic.
 
The result is a lot of sound and fury that really does signify nothing. We don’t like many of these people at all (Cooper’s compassionate – if somewhat dim -- Charlie excepted) and don’t care why they hate each other so much. We’ve seen this kind of dysfunctional family many times before on screen and on the stage. All August: Osage County adds to that canon is an escalated rate of yelling and plate-smashing. There are also individual moments and character reveals that simply don’t make sense, such as Charlie’s long, bumbling saying of grace (which seems to come from another film entirely) and Ivy’s bizarre love for Cumberbatch’s “Little” Charles, who is so emasculated that Ewan McGregor’s bland professor looks like George Clooney by comparison.
 
Streep has the best and most hilarious lines and remains watchable even if she’s ramping up the histrionics, but unfortunately Roberts’ face is permanently fixed in a sneer and her line readings are either flat or roared like King Kong. The prize for best and most controlled acting probably goes to Cooper, whose Charlie at first seems as passive as the other men but eventually shows some backbone and spirit, and Martindale as his wife, who perhaps gives the most naturalistic performance and also hints at a more complicated inner life. As noted, McGregor is understated to the point of vanishing into the furniture, a fatal flaw in a movie where everyone else is shouting at the top of their lungs.

 
Even the “shocking” twist (which one may or may not see coming) is more exhausting than startling after nearly two hours of watching this gruesome collection of genetically linked monsters verbally and emotionally slice and dice each other with no discernible endgame in sight. People just gradually leave, until only Streep and her loyal housekeeper (Misty Upham) are left. But there’s no transcendent moment or great final punchline. Even though August: Osage County is occasionally funny and the cast lights up like an out-of-control fireworks display, its overt theatricality makes the movie itself fizzle out.
 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

5

Becoming the Lone Survivor: Interviews with Peter Berg and Marcus Luttrell

$
0
0
InterviewMatthew Schuchman12/26/2013 at 4:50AM

Director Peter Berg and real life Navy SEAL Marcus Luttrell sit down to discuss the Lone Survivor and its harrowing true story.

When attempting to tell any “true story” on film, there is always an obligation to responsibility placed on artists and filmmakers to get it right. But when that true story is the 2005 events of Operation Red Wings, SEAL Team 10’s tragic attempt to take out a Taliban leader resulting in the death of four of the five SEALs involved, as well many more from failed helicopter coverage, that obligation becomes a heavy burden.
 
Based on the titular lone survivor’s book, Marcus Luttrell, Lone Survivor is the culmination of director Peter Berg trying to tell this story for six years. And he had finally achieved it when he sat down for a press conference interview in New York earlier this month, along with Luttrell himself, to discuss how they made this harrowing film.
 
What was the most challenging part about bringing this story to the screen?
 
Peter Berg: Every movie has its own unique series of challenges. For me probably the biggest challenge was because this was not made up, this is a real human being here, 19 of his friends were killed; I met the mothers and fathers of those men; I met their brothers and sisters, many of them had widows; I met many members of Marcus’ community, the Navy SEAL community, and I knew that one day we would have a screening of this film and those families would all be in the movie theater, and the lights would come up, and I would look those parents in the eyes and I would know whether or not they thought we had gotten it right. That created an overreaching challenge that made me work very hard and made the actors all work very hard to try and make Marcus proud and make the family members proud.
 
How’d you go about filming the actions scenes, and specifically the tumbling down the hill?
 
PB: When I read Marcus’ book and I read those sequences – Marcus and his three brothers jumping off the cliffs – I thought of 9/11 and I was here [in New York] when people were jumping off of the towers and I’m sure if anyone saw those images, they’re very searing and just brutal images. The idea that four men would be standing on a cliff and their best option is to jump, that was something that really penetrated for me creatively and emotionally. We worked with our second unit director and stuntman, Kevin Scott. We had extraordinary stuntmen and because Marcus was there and other SEALs were there, these stuntmen wanted to push a little bit harder than they might normally and often times a lot of my job ended up being trying to calm people down because everybody wanted to get it right. Those stunts were done without any dummies, without any wirework, without anything mechanical. Those were human beings literally throwing themselves off of cliffs. Some guys got hurt, some guys got bumped up and ribs were broken, a lung was punctured, some concussions, but these guys were determined to try and do everything they could to capture what Marcus described in the book. 
 
Were they stunt guys?
 
PB: They were stunt guys, and we had actors. The actors would try and sneak in there. I would get calls because we’d be shooting in one spot and [second unit] would be up in the cliffs, and I’d get a call that Ben Foster snuck in there, and he’s trying to jump, and I’d have to run over there and tell Ben, ‘No, no,’ and then Marcus of course is like, ‘Go on, Ben. Do it, do it.’ Everybody wanted to get it right. We knew we could never be Navy SEALs; we don’t have that ability. That’s not who we are, [points to Luttrell] that’s who he is. But we do have the ability to imitate and to try and mimic and that’s what we tried to do. 
 
When you were watching this, what emotions were you going through and how’d your friends and family feel?
 
Marcus Luttrell: I haven’t really talked to them about it. Most of my closest friends and my family won’t watch the movie. As far as myself, it plays over in my head everyday because I went through it in real life, so when I watched it on screen, basically I would say to myself, ‘I remember that happening. I remember it being worse than that,’ or, ‘You missed something here,’ but what Pete did from what happened to me in real life to what he put on the screen, I’m absolutely overjoyed with what he did with it. He did a great job with it and the actors, the cast and crew, and how they portrayed the whole scenario and how it played out. You have to realize, in real life, the gun battle lasted for over three hours and the movie’s only two hours long. My hat’s off to all those stuntmen who laid it on the line and hurt themselves doing what they had to do to get that done because in real life, we all died and the only reason I’m sitting here is because of modern medicine. I’m basically all titanium. People always ask me, ‘I don’t know how you could watch that, how that effects you,’ and I just tell them, ‘I went through it in real life, so it’s like pilots watching a Top Gun movie or cyclists watching a bicycle movie,’ something like that. You know that that was as close as you could get, but you want me to take my shirt off and show you what it really looks like? But it’s movie. It’s entertainment and that’s what it’s supposed to be. In real life it’s war and war’s not entertainment. War is old men lying and young men dying kind of deal. That’s a saying; I didn’t make that up. [Laughs]

 
What did you want this movie to be? When you looked at this material and decided to put it on screen, what did you want people to walk away with?
 
PB: I never really go into a film saying, ‘Okay, here’s the grand thesis.’ One of the things that’s fascinating about making movies is a movie when it’s done, and you start showing it to people, it reveals its impact, which is often times not what you thought. I bet other filmmakers would agree with this; you’re startled at what touches people or what the takeaway is, and you realize, ‘Well, okay, that is kind of what I meant. I’m surprised to hear it articulated.’ I knew that I wanted to pay respect to men who are willing to put themselves in between us and danger: evil. I knew that. I believe in that. What I also found when I read Marcus’ book, the news cycle that we all live in is so intense, and it’s hard for a news story to stay current for four hours at this point. The churn is so relentless. We’re all so busy and everybody’s on this [holds up his iPhone]. It’s mind-blowing. Everywhere in the world, people are just staring at these things. We’re so busy and we’re so stressed out, and it’s very hard for us to just stop and settle down and be still with anything, much less something as important as the fact that great Americans die for us. And what Marcus did when he wrote the book was he gave me the opportunity to settle down and experience what he and his brothers went through, and that meant a lot to me. Most people clearly understand why we need to respect men like Marcus. A couple of you have already stood up and said thank you and we want to do that. You see a soldier at an airport and he’s in uniform, you want to go up and say, ‘Hey, thank you.’ I find that people in general want to honor and want to acknowledge, but they don’t really know how to. They don’t have that much interaction with soldiers. You drive by military bases and you look in and you think, ‘Wow.’ Maybe you see someone at an airport, but one thing that I think Lone Survivor does, and certainly his book did it, is it gives an audience a chance to, in their own way, acknowledge what these guys are doing, and pay respect, sit for two hours. I’ve gone to five different pro football screenings and seen Payton Manning wait in line behind 15 other people just to get a chance to talk to Marcus. To have the opportunity to divorce themselves from politics, divorce themselves from these politicians who are deciding where these guys go, that’s another [thing]. We’re not interested in that, but to give people the opportunity to say, ‘Okay, wow. Thank you and I understand a little bit now about what you may have gone through.”
 
How’d you capture the comradery between Marcus and his brothers on screen?
 
PB: When Marcus told me that he was gonna’ let me do his film – and believe me, he had many filmmakers he could have given it to - it was a great honor to me, and he made it very clear that I was going to understand who he was and who these men were. Marcus arranged for me to meet all the families of the soldiers that were killed and Marcus arranged for me to spend a lot of time with the Navy SEAL community. I got to go all around the country to pretty classified facilities where the SEALs were training, and then Marcus helped arrange for me to actually get an embed with a SEAL platoon in Iraq, which had never happened. I was the first civilian to ever embed with an active SEAL team. Basically, Marcus just made sure that I understood as much as I could not by talking, but by literally spending the time to be with those communities and to understand not just how they hold their guns and how they put their equipment on, but how they talk to each other, how they feel about each other and wanted me to get this comprehensive understanding of what that culture is. He just made sure that I had access, and he’s so revered in the military community that Marcus Luttrell says, ‘I want this kid to go to Iraq,’ the next thing I know, I’m in a military plane with three Marines sleeping on top of me, flying for eighteen hours with an outhouse on board as the bathroom. Unbelievable. I keep thanking Marcus for that.

 
Is there any information that couldn’t be included in the movie?
 
ML: Yes, ma’am. Some parts were classified, yes, ma’am. Absolutely. The same with the book. The SEAL team just said that we needed to put the story out to squash any rumors that were going around about what happened on the mountain that day, because the families would call me and say, ‘Hey, why didn’t you tell me about this? I didn’t know this had happened.’ I was in a hospital and then I worked up to trying to get back overseas to go fight, and I would say, ‘I don’t have any idea what you’re talking about, ma’am.’ That happened so much that our higher commander actually said, ‘Hey, we’re gonna’ declassify this. We’re gonna’ put it out to the American public, so they can understand what happened and then that answers the questions.’ But with that being said though, some of the stuff that was classified and we can’t talk about, we had to somehow make it so the book made sense where you could follow it and not get lost. And obviously, if you have read the book, there’s probably some chapters where you’re going, ‘Hey, wait a minute. There’s obviously something that had to have happened right here, but it’s not in here.’ It kind of got jumped over and that’s because it’s classified. The same way with the movie, ma’am. We could only take so much information. You’ve got to understand, I was out there for five days and to make a movie like that would have been probably a mini-series or two-part series or something like that. So he did a great job with taking all the information that he had, condensing it and then putting it on the film, the same as we had to do with the book.
 
And to backtrack to your question about how we made the actors a cohesive unit and to work together as a SEAL team and as a unit is basically we took them for a month and some change ahead of production and we beat the snot out of them. We worked them from sunup to sundown like a SEAL team, and the way that you forge a bond, the way that you forge a unit and a brotherhood is not in a peaceful environment, not in a loving environment. That stuff is forged in chaos. That’s how you create a brotherhood, through blood and pain and sweat. Everybody in here who’s married, who has a brother or somebody like that, the reason you love them is because you’ve been through everything with them, the highs and the lows, and it’s the lows that bring you closer together, because you know that they have faults; they have weaknesses and ‘the only way that I’m gonna’ be stronger is I’m gonna’ have that guy next to me. And I don’t have to look over there at him to make sure he’s gonna’ be there. He’s gonna be there, and the only reason he’s not gonna’ be there is if he’s dead.’ The reason I know that is because it’s been tested from day one, week one of training, every day until that very day that it happens because our training never stopped. The SEAL teams from the time we start to the time that we ether get out or we die, we’re training everyday or we’re fighting everyday, and that’s the difference between our unit and the other branches of the military, ma’am.
 
What about the protocols? Has anything changed since the incident?
 
ML: I don’t think I can talk about that, sir. That would probably be off-limits. I’m sorry.
 
Peter, can you compare and contrast your approach to this versus The Kingdom?
 
PB: My approach for most of my films, Friday Night Lights, The Kingdom and certainly Lone Survivor, has been research, research, research. The most critical aspect of prep for me when I’m doing a culture, such as a Navy SEAL culture, in The Kingdom it was an FBI foreign crime investigative culture, Friday Night Lights was the culture of Texas football, which in it’s own way is as intense as aspects of the military, believe it or not. They take the football pretty serious in high school football in Texas, as some of you guys know. If I’m gonna’ go on a film set as a director, as the boss, and I’m gonna’ be standing there with Marcus Luttrell watching me or Mike Murphy’s dad or the Axelson family or any one of ten SEALs that Marcus had on the set at any given time who were good friends with these guys, if I’m gonna’ go there and act as if I’m in a position to run that, I better have a pretty decent understanding of what that world is. At least decent enough so that if I don’t know something, I can look at Marcus and go, ‘Hey man, I don’t understand this. Can you explain this to me,’ in a way that makes him still respect that I’ve done the work, that I know enough to at least understand what a good question is versus a stupid question, and I have to be able to manage it, you know? It’s not easy to manage these guys. They’re a very strong-willed, I don’t know if you can tell [laughs], but rather dynamic individuals and they’re not shy. If you get it wrong, they will not hesitate to tell you that you got it wrong, particularly when you’re portraying their brothers who are dead. So for me, research was everything. It took a long time to make this film, and one of the reasons was I needed to have as good an understanding of what their world was as I could before I felt confident enough to go on the set.
 
Marcus, did you have any say during the casting process? Were there any actors you had in mind to play you or your friends?
 
ML: In the beginning, yes ma’am, that was tough. I thought about everyone else, but the guy who was gonna’ play me. Everybody was coming at me from all different directions like, ‘You need to have Matt Damon, Brad Pitt,’ and my reply to them was, ‘Okay, if I have somebody like that playing me, and you go and watch a movie called Lone Survivor, who do you think is gonna’ make it off the mountain?’ Because in real life, when the parents were at home just sitting by the phone waiting to see which one of us made it off the mountain alive, nobody knew. I wasn’t special. I wasn’t the best frogman out there. The fact that I made it off the mountain was just pure luck, and God’s intervention and stuff like that, and a little bit of skill. When I was talking to Pete about it, I was like, ‘You need to blend the cast with all actors on the same level, so when it goes down and the last guy’s standing, you’re like, wow, I didn’t see that coming.’ He picked Mark Wahlberg. I didn’t have a problem with that. When it came down to it, basically I was the professional at what I do, and he’s the professional at what he does, so really I don’t have that much capability to tell him what to do. It’s like telling a heart surgeon how to work on your heart and like, ‘I don’t think you should cut right here. Let’s go over here. I’m a little sensitive.’ [Laughs]
 
Ben Foster was the guy that I really kind of gravitated towards, and when I saw him in the movies that he was in, I mean, that guy is probably one of the best actors in Hollywood in my opinion. Nothing against the other actors - Taylor and Emile, I love those guys like brothers for what they did – but there’s something about Foster. It got so intense that when he portrayed Matt Axelson, that’s Matt Axelson when you see him on the screen. That’s how he was. He’s just like Ben Foster. He was real quiet, it’s the guy you wouldn’t take a second look at when he walked into a room. You’d be like, ‘Hey, that’s a good looking guy, whatever,’ he’s standing there quiet, doesn’t say much, but when he threw his kit on and he grabbed his rifle, he was the most lethal man you ever met in your entire life. He doesn’t cut you any slack; it was one thing that comes down the pipe. He’s standing or your standing and that’s it.
 
In the SEAL teams, it’s real important, attention to detail. We throw that line out regularly, and it really does mean something. Attention to detail doesn’t mean pay attention to detail. Like, move your shirt over a little bit because your button’s not in line with your belt, that’s attention to detail, and Ben captured that. He was always asking those questions like, ‘What do I do here?’ And when we got up to filming, literally, if we got into a scrape or something went down, I could throw Ben a rifle and he could go to work. He’s that good. One of the things that really got my attention is that he wanted to learn everything and really learn it. [Laughs] We put a live weapon in his hand, and he was shooting at a target at 25 meters, and I was like, ‘Okay, if you can hit that target at 25 meters, you could hit that target at 700 meters. Let’s do it. You ready?’ He’s like, ‘Yeah, I’m ready.’ Took two or three shots, he missed, I said, ‘Concentrate. Breathe. It’s not like 25 meters. Just think about it like that.’ And then when he got done, he was shooting targets at 800 meters, just painting it down the line and then moving, shooting, communicating. I don’t know if you’ve seen the film ma’am, but then you kind of understand where I’m coming from with that. And he never stopped. After the film, while filming, before filming, he’s always questions, questions, questions. All of them really put out like that and it was a blessing. But as far as the actor to play me, I probably could have just been like, ‘You need this guy to play me,’ and it was like that never happened, ma’am. I stayed back from that and let Pete do it.
 
***First photograph by Matthew Schuchman.
 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

The Most Interesting Moments of 2013

$
0
0
Odd ListDen Of Geek12/26/2013 at 7:22AM

It's almost a New Year, but first let's look back one more time at the biggest (or weirdest) moments and events of 2013!

The sound of excitement and open champagne bottles can already be heard like echoes from Times Square to the Staples Center. However, it's still 2013 and it has most certainly been a year of the geek. Go to the nearest multiplex and choose between Marvel superheroes or girls on fire in a dystopian future; turn on your TV and see that the biggest scripted series either involve zombies, headless horsemen, or dragons; read ANY comic book, which is now considered a trendy thing to do! Join as as we look back at the year that was with some of the coolest (or, at least, most interesting) moments that comprised the last 12 months!
 
JANUARY
 

Nobody Seemed to Like Hansel and Gretel, Yet It Gets a Sequel
When it opened in the dead of January 2013, nobody seemed especially excited about the comedy-action hybrid Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters. Even appealing stars Jeremy Renner and Gemma Arterton seemed bored with this dullard of a would-be blockbuster, all of which seemed to prelude its anemic opening of $19 million, which grew to a paltry domestic take of $55 million. And yet, if there is ever a better example of the importance of international markets in the 21st century box office races, we cannot think of it. Grossing a stunning $170 million overseas, Hansel and Gretelappears to be the first of these “reimagined” fairy tale movies to actually have a sequel greenlit (though Alice in Wonderland 2 will likely get here first). It would seem that witch hunting is still good sport for many geeks around the world.
 
Superior Spider-Man Does the Unthinkable
At the end of 2012, Peter Parker seemingly died, with his consciousness replaced by that of Doctor Octopus. How do you top that? Well, what about making Doc Ock take over Peter's life...including his superheroic identity? If you haven't read the comic, this sounds like a completely ludicrous concept. To be fair, it kinda is. But it works. And despite an initial outcry, readers have spent all of 2013 watching one of Spidey's most notorious villains try his very best to be a hero, all while adding new tricks to Spider-Man's repertoire. 

Star Wars Gets a Director
We knew that Disney would have to get someone big to resurrect the Star Wars franchise for 2015's Star Wars Episode VII. We had no idea that they'd go right for the guy who resurrected the OTHER big space opera. While (like most things that happened this year), Abrams' confirmation as director of Star Wars Episode VII was met with a mixed response by fans, there was no denying that this was a bold move on Disney's part.
 
FEBRUARY
 

Warm Bodies Warms Every Heart…Even the Living Dead’s
Following the massive success of films and shows like Twilight, The Vampire Diaries, and Teen Wolf, it became a running joke that after vampires, werewolves, and witches, Hollywood would eventually turn zombies into romantic heroes….Well, they did! And it was lovely. In perhaps the most unexpected popular rom-com of the year, Nicholas Hoult is R, a zombie with feelings in a post-apocalyptic world. When he falls in love with Julie (Teresa Palmer), the daughter of the human resistance’s leader and girlfriend of his last meal, things get a little awkward. But after a bit of coaxing and getting to know each other, they’re ready to face the world in Jonathan Levine’s shockingly charming brains and roses laugher.
 

A Good Day [for a Franchise] to Die Hard
Love him or love him more, John McClane is one tough S.O.B. to put in the ground. Hans Gruber and a team of Eurotrash couldn’t do it when he was running around barefoot. Hans’ brother also failed when he had bombs planted all over Manhattan to distract him. Even Timothy Olyphant came up short when he blew up half of the east coast. Yet for many fans, A Good Day to Die Hard, the fifth entry in the McClane legacy, just may be that silver bullet. Performed with unwavering apathy by star Bruce Willis—who confirmed later that year that he’s bored with explosions—the film failed to gain any new fans, but still managed to wrangle $300 million worldwide. Reportedly there will be a sixth film to end the series; hopefully McClane will be awake for that one.
 
MARCH
 

Game of Thrones Breaks The Internet
Already the geek show of choice amongst the premium cable darlings as it headed into its third season, Game of Thrones hit its prime in 2013 when it offered unforgettable television iconography nearly every week, pulling the mainstream audience in for the bitter end. We all cheered when handless Jaime Lannister went back for the bear and the maiden fair and suppressed a giggle when Joffrey took away Tyrion’s stool, forcing Sansa to kneel for her wedding vows. But the two sequences that will likely live on in television infamy began with the series’ first wholly feel-good payoff when Daenerys Targaryen euphorically took what was hers by fire and blood. The era of happy tidings that followed the Khaleesi switching tongues to old Valyrian, telling her dragons, “Dracarys” (roughly translated as, “Burn all these fools to the ground, because I’m the mother of dragons, bitch!”) lasted all the way to the penultimate episode…when the House Tully joined the House Frey. The strings of “The Rains of Castamere” still haunt HBO subscribers’ dreams, as does the sound of Catelyn Stark’s soul-bearing cry uttered upon the mutilation of her son. Just as she didn’t bother resisting the end as the blade that found her throat, fans could not resist breaking Twitter, Facebook and all other means of social communication in abject horror. Easily one of the five greatest TV death scenes, The Red Wedding is now almost as infamous the viral video chronicling just a handful of the hearts it broke that night…undoubtedly to George R.R. Martin’s delight.
 

Audiences Return to Oz
Speaking of Sam Raimi, his name shows up again this year as the director of Disney’s prequel/semi-reboot to the fabled legacy of The Wizard of Oz. With James Franco helming it as the conman turned savior of Baum’s mystical realm, reaction was somewhat divided about this portrayal of the grifter. However, Raimi’s gift for eye-popping visuals and out-of-the-frame thrills made even the 3D experience feel worth the price of admission. Albeit, Mila Kunis as the Wicked Witch of the West may have needed a little more fire to go with her rather green turn.

SimCity Pissed A Lot of People Off--Us Included
Nothing was more frustrating this year than the release of SimCity.  We've never seen a launch handled that poorly (even Diablo III's wasn't THIS bad).  Servers wouldn't load for the majority of players, and it remained that way for almost a full week after the game's launch. In fact, EA even gave players a free game for our troubles because of how bad the launch was. Even after launch, the game wasn't all that great--small cities, glitches, and some other stuff. And talk about an angry mob of gamers--the online outrage was immense.  SimCity will forever remain one of the worst launches in online gaming.

GI Joe Retaliation Gives the Fans What They Want
Less a sequel to GI Joe: Rise of Cobra than an apology for it, GI Joe: Retaliation actually delivered something recognizable as a GI Joe movie. Aside from the obvious merits of having Bruce Willis and The Rock engaged in a battle of charm (and the added bonus of the RZA as a blind kung-fu master), GI Joe: Retaliation unabashedly took the franchise back to its cartoon and toy roots. The fifteen minute battle with Snake Eyes, Storm Shadow, and dozens of multi-colored ninjas on the side of a mountain was worth the price of admission alone!
 
APRIL
 

Evil Dead Swallows Horror Remake Curse’s Soul
Generally, horror fans are not very keen on seeing their favorite cult classics receive the remake treatment (particularly from Platinum Dunes). Friday the 13th, Nightmare on Elm Street and Halloween are but a few of the ones that left genre fans wishing Hollywood would just go climb a tree in Sam Raimi’s garden. Yet when that camp-horror maestro decided to produce Fede Alvarez’s proposed remake of Evil Dead, along with the 1981 film’s original creative team of Robert Tapert and Bruce Campbell as well, it caught fans’ eyes. While 2013’s Evil Deadis far less funny or chatty than the Raimi/Campbell classics—to the point where we personally felt a little more Deadite trash talking would have been a huge plus—the movie was gruesome, cruel and all around unforgiving of its stock characters; earning its soul sucking bonafides in their eternal damnation. Seriously, when Jane Levy’s Mia sticks her bloody stump of an arm into a chainsaw, the audience roars louder than the motor as it slices through a demon’s face. “Suck on this, motherfucker!” Well admit that our dream is no longer Evil Dead 4 now, but an Ash and Mia team-up movie!

A New Fighting Game Emerges...and We Love It
April saw the release of NetherRealms' highly anticipated Injustice: Gods Among Us, which brought many popular DC characters to the screen--and killing The Joker has never been so much fun! Injustice quickly grew in popularity and has been the focus of many major gaming tournaments throughout the year. While still not as popular as Street Fighter IV (and it never will be), it is a perfect supplement for those that love the genre but need a break from hadoukening. Injustice successfully breathed new life into the fighting game genre, showing us that fighting games can be more than just one dimensional.

Mad Men Season Six 
Mad Men sure was strange this season. The Don Draper of the past had almost completely disappeared. The brilliant, suave, bohemian master ad man was gone and in his place was an emotionally stunted, bored, scummy loser who reeked of booze and his neighbor’s wife’s perfume. On top of that, we got trippy drug sequences, a fresh new merger, and fan favorite Peggy Olsen really coming into her own. Most importantly, we learned a lot more about the Don Draper/Dick Whitman complex, with the season ending on a note that suggests that Don is finally ready to face his past coming into the drama’s final season in 2014.
 
MAY
 

Iron Man 3: Marvel’s New Phase Splits Fans in Two
Iron Man 3 marked the launch of the year’s biggest superhero film, and likely its most controversial. While the critics and media, including our own writers, quibbled over the following month’s Man of Tomorrow, fans were far more divided on the start of Marvel Studios’ “Phase 2.” Despite featuring Robert Downey Jr. back in his signature role as a superhero who happens to be a playboy (or should it be a playboy who happens to be a superhero?), Tony Stark was not greeted with as much fanfare by superhero fans as it was by general global audiences that elevated this pic to over $1 billion worldwide. Marvel newcomer Shane Black, the man who first helped reboot Downey’s career with the criminally underrated action-comedy Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005), came in to give Downey’s Stark a slightly more sardonic and indifferent tone. The film also featured Stark mulling over whether to continue being Iron Man after his sudden (and random) PTSD following 2012’s The Avengers during this Christmas-themed adventure (it IS a Shane Black movie). But of course the real point of contention is that following a dark and brooding marketing campaign centered around a “Joker-ish” performance by Ben Kingsley as the Mandarin…they got this image.

Did it work, did it not? It depends entirely if you wanted to view this film as a comedy. We generally found the twist of the Mandarinreally being a junkie actor strung along by Guy Pearce as creative, clever and ultimately, very, very funny. This is not the best movie produced by Marvel Studios, but it will indelibly leave its mark by being the second in the whole multi-franchise to earn 10 figures.
 

Star Trek Into Darkness…and KHAAAAN!!!!
Everyone and their mother loved J.J. Abrams’ Stark Trek reboot in 2009. So, as inevitable as what happens when you put two Tribbles together, a sequel was coming. Still, four years is a long time to wait for any franchise and when it returned with Benedict Cumberbatch as the villainous Khan, fans were again left somewhat divided. While enjoying the same glowing reviews of Iron Man 3, there is no doubt that Abrams’ follow-up clearly aspired to Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan, right down to Khan killing one half of sci-fi’s greatest bromance (except this time it’s Kirk!), only for that hero to be miraculously resurrected shortly thereafter. There is no doubt Star Trek Into Darkness is a visually stimulating movie with strong performances from all the leads. And yes, Cumberbatch devours the screen like a Borg absorbs a planet. Still, this space adventure does feel a bit off months later, not least of all because J.J. Abrams jumped ship from the Enterprise in favor for Disney’s Millennium Falcon before this film was even released.
 

Fast & Furious 6 Still a Well Worn Rush
It is getting harder and harder to remember that the Fast and the Furious franchise was once about street racing. A series birthed about exploring the "underworld" of suped up quarter-mile runs, the series has become the biggest and best blockbuster budgeted extravangaza not based on a comic book in recent years. Yep, Fast Fivewas an addrenaline fueledOcean's 11 meets East L.A. Avengers in the dumbest (and most entertaining) heist film ever conceived. It also featured a refreshingly diverse cast most highlighted by the introduction of Dwayne Johnson as the series' absolute best antagonist/frenemy. In Fast & Furious 6, Johnson's DEA Agent Hobbs is back as he recruits Toretto (Vin Diesel) and Brian O'Conner (Paul Walker) into ONE LAST last job after 2011's final mission. And this time, it is to save a member of the family...the long dead Letty (Michelle Rodriguez). The soapy premise is almost as ridiculous as this spooks and sports cars espionage thriller marketed on its "vehicular warfare." Yet, the cast is still perfectly entertaining as their "family" and Justin Lin's eye for creative action sequences is still peerless. The movie is not nearly as fun as Fast Five, but it is still a ride franchise fans have been taking for. It even sets up for Fast & Furious 7to finally offer a truly great villain for the series. Even after the recent, tragic passing of Paul Walker, we still speculate this is the ideal action franchise for the 21st century.
 

Clara Oswald Really is the Impossible Girl
The second half of Doctor Who’s seventh season/series since the reboot marked a multi-episode long mystery about just exactly who Clara Oswin Oswald is. Sure, this felt a bit like a Steven Moffat mystery box that was dragged out too long since Whovians already generally were onboard with the character following her charming introductions in both “Asylum of the Daleks” and “The Snowmen” Christmas Special from 2012. Luckily, we also had fun adventures from the creative minds of Neil Gaiman among others to make the seven-episode riddle still work. The result was a “second part” of Season 7 that felt a bit uneven at times. Fortunately, it concluded like a perfectly formed bowtie with a fantastic season finale. For “In the Name of The Doctor” marked a return to form for Doctor Who by bringing all of the Doctor’s “gang,” including Clara, Vastra, Jenny, and Strax, to combat a villainous Richard E. Grant on the planet where the Doctor’s future corpse is supposedly buried. The episode also represented the beautiful swan song for River Song, the Doctor’s wife who died sometime in-between episodes (Doctor Who is confusing like that). But why the episode will truly be remembered is that it turns out Clara really is “The Impossible Girl” Eleven is always ranting about, due to her being in the entire Doctor Whocanon. It was a bold move that makes perfect sense in the show’s timey-wimey, sometimes-storybook logic. This also promotes Clara to the role of one of his most important companions. Finally, “In the Name of the Doctor” teed off the 50th anniversary later in the year when we finally meet the Regeneration who will not be named…
 
JUNE
 

Man of Steel Falls to Earth
No reboot has probably had more anticipation than Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel, least of all because of producer Christopher Nolan’s involvement. Marketed as a semi-continuation of Nolan’s Dark Knight Trilogy, this retelling of Superman’s origin promised a post-crisis vision of how the Son of Jor-El came to Earth to save us all from our failings as human beings. As the first Superman movie in 35 years to be set free from the shadow of Richard Donner, Christopher Reeve, et al., this was supposed to be the big one. How did it measure up?
Well, continuing the entire trend of Summer 2013 blockbusters, this is one that has left the geek community once more arguing amongst themselves. While some critics were overly harsh in their judgments of the superhero film for being too dark, bleak and mean spirited to be a “Superman movie,” fans by and large appreciated the somber verisimilitude Snyder and screenwriter David S. Goyer infused in this telling. Also well-received were Henry Cavill and Amy Adams as modern day takes on The Last Son of Krypton and his biggest fan. Gone are disguises as she sniffs out his secret identity before they are even formally introduced. Also, a new dynamic that works well is seeing Russell Crowe give new life to Jor-El beyond Brando’s famed white hair. That might be enough for many, however the real benchmark is how fans process the third act, which features Superman failing to prevent Zod from slaughtering tens of thousands of people in Metropolis, resulting in a downtown battle that looks more like our worst nightmare of urban terrorism following the still psyche-scarring horrors of 9/11. Also, Superman kills Zod. Does this movie work? It's best for every geek to decide that on their own.
Batman Gets a New Origin
Scott Snyder and Greg Capullo took Batman back to his roots with Batman: Zero Year, a massive story that began in June's Batman#21. Why is this a big deal? Well, Batman's "official" origin has been widely considered to be the untouchable (and highly influential) Batman: Year One, by Frank Miller and David Mazzucchelli, and there have been no attempts to unpack Batman's early years in detail in the comics since that masterpiece came on the scene in 1987. But with the newly-rebooted DC Universe, all things must change, and Snyder and Capullo began weaving an intricate look at Batman's early days as a crime fighter. Not only is Zero Year as fresh and original as such a well-known tale could possibly be, it's been warmly received by comic fans...which is a superheroic feat in itself.
 
JULY
 

The Lone Ranger Derails
Everyone apparently told Gore Verbinski that making a version of The Lone Ranger that cost $200 million and starred Johnny Depp dressed as a Comanche was a bad idea…and they were right. What may stand as one of the most bizarre blockbuster flops of all time, this was an action movie with not one, not two, but THREE train crashes, some superb Monument Valley photography, still a good bit of CGI thrown in and…Johnny Depp playing a Comanche. How this got made for $215 million (before reshoots) still boggles the mind. There is some fun to be had in the pic, due in no small part to the wonderful use of the William Tell Overture at the end of the movie, but getting to that point will be its own trip through a cinematic desert.
 

The Conjuring Possesses The Summer as a Sleeper Hit
Micro-budgeted horror movies are a part of the modern wide release landscape, but few if any have struck a chord like James Wan’s The Conjuring. Based on the supposedly true stories of Ed and Lorraine Warren, the film recalls the events of their most horrific case—a Rhode Island house where a witch who sold her soul to Satan after murdering her infant still haunts families a century later—and it does so in bloody perfect fashion. Relying more on old school haunted house scares over gore, as well as a strong cast playing actually fleshed out characters (and with a dash of The Exorcist thrown in), The Conjuringmade audiences scream, squeal and all around scurry out of the theater when the lights blessedly came back on. The movie earned a staggering $316 million worldwide with a $137 million from the U.S. alone, making it the surprise hit of the summer and strangely the most feel good after so many big budgeted disappointments.
 

The Wolverine Fights On
And then there is the superhero movie that exceeded everyone’s expectations. Following up on the less-than-fondly remembered X-Men Origins: Wolverine, The Wolverine had a high mountain to climb, but it did just that when it extracted its claws and cut the rock down to scale for its own convenience. As much a 1970s kung-fu movie that happened to star a knife-wielding Clint Eastwood as a superhero movie, James Mangold’s The Wolverine is the film X-fans have always wanted for the furry anti-hero. The first two acts flow perfectly as Logan’s stories in Japan are interwoven with Nagasaki and other unseemly details when he battles ninjas on bullet trains and wanna-be Samurai in tea gardens, all with a little romance thrown in for a character who also can simultaneously perform heart surgery ON HIMSELF. The climax might feel a little cluttered as it tried to be more “comic booky” than it ever needed to be, but this was an adventure that most walked away buzzing about. Cameos from Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen as Xavier and Magneto of course only could levitate geekdom’s excitement.
 

Man of Steel 2 is “Batman vs. Superman”…
Trying to round up news stories for future movies in a 2013 list can be a bit like chasing Krypton particles in the wind, but sometimes the announcement is bigger than the movie itself. When Zack Snyder had Harry Lennix read from the pages of The Dark Knight Returns at San Diego Comic Con 2013, Hall H erupted in the type of thunder that could make Zod tremble. The next Superman movie was going to also be a Batman movie. While this left some Superman fans wringing their hands, many more DC fans rejoiced at a shared universe in the offing.
 
AUGUST
 

…And Then Ben Affleck Broke The Internet Again
But in August 2013 is when it REALLY happened, when The Batfleck Rises. Yes, when Ben Affleck was announced to play Batman, fans, casual moviegoers and diehard Bat-fans broke the Internet in unison. Overnight, the actor who rebuilt his career as the filmmaker behind Gone Baby Gone, The Townand Argo, the last of which won an Oscar earlier in the year, became “the guy from Gigli.” In a 1988 repeat, fans were practically rioting in the street at the newest casting of the Batman. To which we still have some sage-like advice: Check out this list of Seven Actors Fans Also Thought Would Suck. Thank us later.
 

Jim Carrey Disses Kick-Ass 2
Actor Jim Carrey made hay earlier in the year when he drew a snarky (but hilarious) point about gun control in a Funny or Die video. Many, including Den of Geek, wondered how exactly he could square that though with his latest film, which featured him in trailers waving a gun and laughing like maniac. Carrey answered that question when he threw Kick-Ass 2 under the bus by not only refusing to promote it, but openly denouncing its violence on Twitter. Talk about a great way to make friends in this industry…It is unfortunate because while Kick-Ass 2 proved to be quite underwhelming when compared to the irreverent joy bouncing from the 2010 original’s potty mouth (largely thanks to director Matthew Vaughn and co-writer Jane Goldman in retrospect), Carrey is actually quite good in this movie. Indeed, he is downright hilarious in the way he becomes his character throughout the film. Coupled with another star-making turn by Chloe Grace Moretz as the ever-controversial Hit-Girl, Kick-Ass 2had more than a few elements going for the biggest Mark Millar enthusiasts. It appears that we can scratch Jim Carrey’s name out of this group after he even did free-promotion for the 2010 film as a fan. Too bad that’s the reason, as we’re always quick to provide context the idea that movies are responsible for violence, particularly in as “Looney Tunes” a fashion as the Kick-Assmovies.
 
SEPTEMBER
 

Sleepy Hollow Heads for a Wild Spin in 2013
If you told us a year ago that Fox would have a runaway hit by turning Washington Irving's The Legend of Sleepy Hollowinto a modern day police procedural with a time traveling Revolutionary warrior Ichabod Crane, we'd say what conspiracy theories were you reading when smoking that contraband. But here we are and Sleepy Hollowis fantastic, campy fun. A case of creators Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci, Len Wiseman, and Phillip Iscove mixing Dan Brown-styled historical fantasy with an actual "end of the world" fantasy based on the Book of Revelations, and then stirring it in a pot of Irving archetypes, this show is often bizarre and always entertaining. A major factor of this can be credited to stars Tom Mison and Nicole Beharie's appealing chemistry as Ichabod Crane and modern day deptuy Abbie Mills, however nothing beats seeing the Headless Horseman (now Death made flesh and first horseman of the Apocalypse) pumping a shotgun like he's out of a Quentin Tarantino movie. Throw in Orlando Jones for some awesome supporting work, and you have the best new broadcast network show of the season.
 

Agents of SHIELD vs. Fan ExpectationsMarvel's Agents of SHIELD debuted to spectacular ratings and a fair amount of critical acclaim, but quickly found itself on the wrong side of fan expectations. Despite the prominent inclusion of Joss Whedon's name for the premiere (not to mention the Marvel brand name) and the promise that this show would expand the Marvel movie universe, a series of uneven episodes and a parade of decidedly non-super foes left fans confused about what the show was supposed to be. There's still plenty of time for Agents of SHIELD to right the helicarrier, but they might want to do it quickly.

Gangsters Take a Cut of TV
It was a good year for gangsters on TV. Not necessarily in quality, but in quantity. Gangsters don’t get a lot of play on TV, not when you compare them to cops, doctors, forensics experts, and vampires. Boardwalk Empiretook the place of The Sopranosand Luck just ran out of the money last year, which was a shame. All those horses. I don’t think we even got to see a scene between Nick Nolte and Dustin Hoffman. Even William Forsythe couldn’t save Mob Doctor, which spilled over into this year. Magic Citysurvived. We couldn’t really pay attention to Bonnie and Clyde...which just tried too hard. But it didn’t look like they knew what they were trying. A love story? A vanilla fetish parade? A tween vampire romance? Regardless, we're glad it was on.
DC Comics Lets the Bad Guys Win
With Forever Evil #1, DC Comics reintroduced The Crime Syndicate to their New 52 universe. For the uninitiated, think of the Crime Syndicate as the evil, goateed dopplegangers from Star Trekepisodes like "Mirror, Mirror." While Forever Evil has (so far) been one of the highlights of the rebooted Justice League's run, what made this more than your standard event was the simultaneous launch of "Villains Month" in which every single DC superhero book was replaced by titles showcasing the bad guys. Some of these comics dealt with how the baddies were reveling in a world in which the heroes found themselves defeated, while others focused on their origins. While the quality of the Villains Month one-shots was inconsistent, it was still something we hadn't really seen before, and it was a bold move by DC.
Arrow Season Two is Right on Target
After a first season that was often mired in some of the less-appealing aspects of the CW's action/soap opera format, Arrowcame roaring back with a second season that corrected the sins of the first. With virtually every episode featuring a parade of DC Comics supporting characters, supervillains, and recognizable heroes, Arrowwas suddenly getting praised as one of the best superhero shows ever. And as the show's first half was spent building up to the reveal of Barry Allen and the origin of The Flash (who will soon get a show of his own), we have to wonder how they'll up the ante in the second half of season two.

Breaking Bad Delivers a Finale That's 97% Pure

Breaking Badis the latest television show to become a piece of monoculture - a pop culture installment that captured the attention of almost the entire nation. It’s amazing how fiercely viewership grew for the program coming into its startlingly powerful final season. With all eyes on Walter White, Breaking Bad’s final eight episodes did not disappoint. The tension and action grew exponentially week to week, leaving most to wonder how creator Vince Gilligan and Co. could conjure up a satisfying conclusion that would live up to expectations. No worries though, Gilligan executed with Heisenberg-like precision, giving Walt a goodbye tour de force that wrapped up all the loose ends and left most people without a qualm. It’s likely we wont see another series pull off this kind of storytelling mastery for quite some time.


Dexter, on the other hand...
While Breaking Bad got everything right on its way out, Dextercouldn’t seem to do anything correctly. In its final season, the Dexterwriters followed the trends of their latter season sins; poor characterization, plot lines that went nowhere, needless new characters, and a hapless devotion to their main character with a refusal to acknowledge his many blaring flaws. To make matters worse, the series ended in a completely laughable, head-scratching manner. Apparently the conclusion was at the fault of Showtime Executives, who refused to let the titular character die, but who can we blame for the rest of this disappointing season?
 
OCTOBER
 

Gravity is Out of This World
Some of us at Den of Geek are not exactly the biggest fans of 3D. With that said, if you haven’t seen Gravity in 3D yet, DO SO NOW. If it can’t be done at nearby second-run theater, buy a 3D TV for pity’s sake, because this movie is the most visually engrossing cinematic experience in years. As the project that took Alfonso Cuarón far too many years to get made, this mind-bending sci-fi survivalist story features stunning visuals that are still confounding in their effectiveness. Relying almost wholly on restrained and riveting performances from Sandra Bullock and George Clooney, Cuarón invents a world where the cameras seemingly float in their dolly like orbits around the stars as they desperately look for a way home in the quiet vacuum of space. It can be argued there are better movies in 2013, but none will have the visceral impact and undeniable memorability as the one where Clooney drifts into the black, enjoying the sunrise.
 

Something Wicked This Way Comes on American Horror Story: Coven
Every season in the now accepted anthology series of American Horror Story brings its own unique scenario and campy quality (preferably with a delicious diva role for Jessica Lange). But in 2013, it became a bewitching mixture of feminist allegory (when Ryan Murphy can stay focused) and powerhouse acting from the best female cast on television. Besides Lange there is also Angela Bassett, Kathy Bates, Sarah Paulson, Lily Rabe, Patti LuPone, Taissa Farmiga, Gabourey Sidibe and Emma Roberts. And they are all being allowed to camp it up as a group of witches and/or vodou priestesses who battle for supremacy in New Orleans and use burning stakes, vodou dolls, Frankenstein monsters, resurrected corpses and even the occasional zombie to do it. Yes, they too have walking dead, but these are of the vodou variety and get cut up with chainsaws! For any fan of horror madlibs, this season might be the best one yet.
 

Batman: Arkham Origins Glides Above Buggy Launch
Even if Batman: Arkham Origins is pretty much more of the same offered by Rocksteady’s 2011 gem Batman: Arkham City, it is still nevertheless exceedingly fun to play. Indeed, the engine of the Arkham Games, which four years after Asylumisstill simulating the feeling of being Batman, must be wonderful, because it’s allowed Warner Brothers Games Montreal to survive a bumpy launch. Stuffed with pauses and glitches, Arkham Originsstill is one of the most entertaining games of 2013 thanks to a compelling story that finally does justice to Bane after two lukewarm appearances in the previous games’ efforts, and also features a very clever interpretation of Batman and Joker’s earliest encounters. While the game lacks the polish and innovation of the previous two Arkhamentries, it offers enough of what made those PS3/360 classics to ensure this generation’s last trip back to Gotham is more than worth playing. It was a highlight.
 
NOVEMBER
 

Thor: The Dark World Hammers Phase 2 Forward
And once more we arrive at 2013’s latest superhero wedge issue. Despite getting mostly favorable reviews, if slightly more tepid than Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark World’s sitcom approach to the antics of the Asgardian God of Thunder has left some Marvel fans apprehensive and others begging for more. Reuniting Thor (Chris Hemsworth) with his lady love Jane Foster (Natalie Portman), plus her gang of tagalongs including Darcy (Kat Dennings) and Eric (Stellan Skarsgard), made for supposedly dark times when the evil Dark Elves came to Asgard and Earth to…get some evil thing or aether. We don’t really know. They’re just bad, and they kill Thor’s mama. But despite this dark turn, as well as its welcome invitation for Loki (Tom Hiddleston) to join the show as the real lead, the movie is unmistakably funny. Indeed, the climax feels like a great finish to a madcap comedy with the entire Scooby gang getting in on the action. Oh and Thor saves the world, we guess. Great disposable escapism or a half-hearted effort? You be the judge.

Marvel and Netflix Team-Up For Unprecedented Superhero Action
Not happy with superhero box-office dominance and a prime-time network show, Marvel looks to satisfy binge-watchers, as well! With the announcement that Daredevil, Luke Cage, Iron Fist, and Jessica Jones would each get Netflix shows, culminating in an Avengers-style team-up as they join forces as The Defenders, Marvel made it clear that they weren't going to play it safe with their ever-expanding shared superhero universe. We're still probably quite a ways off from seeing the first of these, but it's definitely something to look forward to!
 

Doctor Who Turns 50
And the Doctor came back again in 2013 for what may have been the biggest televised geek event of the year (or ever). Simulcast in 94 countries and 1,500 movie theaters around the globe, it really was “The Day of the Doctor.” And in it, we pick up the cliffhanger from “In the Name of the Doctor,” which featured the revelation that John Hurt is the previously unknown regeneration Doctor (since disowned) who blew up Gallifrey. It is all very geeky…and wonderful. The ultimate fan dream of David Tennant’s Tenth Doctor and Matt Smith’s Eleventh teaming up comes true through the help of Queen Elizabeth I (yes, THAT Queen Elizabeth), and they join forces to save Earth in 2013, but also more importantly, save their souls when they convince Hurt’s War Doctor not to blow up Gallifrey. It changes the entire canon of Doctor Who and sets a new course for the upcoming Twelfth Doctor, Peter Capaldi, expected to arrive on Christmas Day! Until then, cheers to Ten and Eleven, because sandshoes (and that is what they are!) and bowties are cool! Almost as much as a Tom Baker cameo….
Boardwalk Empire Says Goodbye to Half-Moon
This wasn’t our favorite season on Boardwalk Empire, but not due to lack of quality...we just liked other seasons more. The writing, acting, and plot were engaging, fun and treacherous. Quite a few beloved characters got buried under the sands of Atlantic City and there was at least one surprising survivor. Everyone expected Dr. Narcisse to get whacked this year and most people probably wanted him to. Not us. He’s not quite the “Manson Lamps” HBO characters like Richie Aprile, Gyp Rosetti, or even Russell Edgington on True Blood, but he can kick up his share of chaos. No, he did not die, he was condemned to live. And to live as what? A rat. A rat with principles. That’s going to make him just insane next season and we're looking forward to it. On the other hand, we're not looking forward to a season without Richard Harrow. Michael Shannon was a blast this year. His slow corruption is almost complete and he’s got Manson lamps to burn.
 

The Hunger Games Catches Fire and Imaginations
If you were to tell most people that The Hunger Games: Catching Fire would be the biggest and best blockbuster in 2013 just a year ago, they would have laughed. But here we are and The Hunger Games: Catching Fire rocks. Proving definitively that old Hollywood wisdom dictating women can’t lead action movies is wrong, this dystopian sci-fi epic features Jennifer Lawrence returning in her star-making role as Katniss Everdeen just as she ignites the fumes of revolution into a fully blazing war. Preferring IMAX to 3D, there is something old school about this film that places emphasis on characters, performances and writing, as opposed to solely setting up the next entry. And while this film does end with a heavy-handed cliffhanger, most of the moviegoing public in America will be back to see if this girl can catch enough fire to bring down an authoritarian regime! Oh, and the love triangle actually works pretty well too.

The Next-Gen Consoles Release To Mild Excitement
It's undeniable that Microsoft botched their delivery of the Xbox One when it was announced at E3 earlier this year. But the company rebounded (somewhat) by the time the console released on November. Even so, the early reviews of the consoles generally lacked enthusiasm and excitement, and the same thing goes for the PlayStation 4. November saw the Battle of the Launch Day Exclusives, which in our opinion, seemed to favor the Xbox One with Forza 5 and Dead Rising, beating out the PS4's Knack and Killzone: Shadow Fall. Hopefully, 2014 brings us more games for our new consoles that will make us fall in love with them. For now, they're just mildly amusing us.
 

Frozen Thaws All Hearts
For each and every accusation hurled at Disney movies, deep down we know that we all love them when done right. When they find that perfect balance between fairy tale and modernized wit, Broadway musical and animated adventure, there is nothing as enchanting as a fantasy from the House of Mouse. And Frozenwas the one we’ve been waiting for. As the best animated film released by Walt Disney Animation Studios since The Lion King, Frozen is that rare fairy tale that appeals just as much to adults as it does children. With two princesses who are more well-rounded, and Kristen Bell-approved kooky, than their brand heritage, theirs is a story of two sisters as opposed to a girl looking for love. Indeed directors Chris Buck and Jennifer Lee even subvert that aspect through a clever script that also guarantees Josh Gad’s Olaf will be a treasured plush toy for many Christmases to come. Nonetheless, the real magic comes from a book of songs by Robert Lopez and Kristen Anderson-Lopez who imbue the film with a coveted timeless quality. They provide a number of showstoppers with “Let It Go,” Queen Elsa’s self-empowerment anthem for being different, bringing down the movie house every time as Idina Menzel’s sinuous voice proves as arresting as the gorgeously rendered CGI snow and ice designs. This is the one that Disney and animation geeks have long for, and it is a true delight that will thrill generations to come.
 
DECEMBER
 

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Burns a Path Forward
The last major blockbuster of 2013 of course had to be one of more division. Based on J.R.R. Tolkien’s slender, shimmering novel, Desolation of Smaug is the second installment in a nine-hour adaptation of the text. It can be ponderous at times, but also glorious. Moving at a faster clip than its 2012 predecessor, Desolation of Smaugfeatures a number of set-pieces serving as a tourism guide to Middle-earth (or New Zealand), such as the whacky escape via barrels from the wood elves, and the fight with giant spiders. But of course, the real magnificence to be found here is Smaug, the dragon that would burn Lake-town. His ending may be a cliffhanger, but we all know that we’ll be seeing his scaly face again in 2014.

The first big-screen Wonder Woman is Cast!
It turns out that Wonder Woman is also in the Man of Steel sequel. But whatever you do...don't call it a Justice League movie. The Amazing Amazon has never made it to the cinemas in her nearly 75 year history, but there's a first time for everything. Gal Gadot will make cinematic history as the first big screen Wonder Woman when Batman vs. Superman (or whatever it's called) opens in July, 2015.
 
So there are most interesting moments from 2014! What were your thoughts about them? Did you fall on the sides of praise or outrage over battle lines like the Mandarin, Khan, and Superman snapping Zod’s neck? Were you ecstatic or merely thrilled about the return of Gallifrey in Doctor Who? And how many hours have you logged into Grand Theft Auto V? Let us know about these subjects—and any we missed!—in the comments section below!
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

On The Waterfront: Terry Malloy Was A Rat

$
0
0
ReviewTony Sokol12/27/2013 at 6:53AM

On the Waterfront as reviewed by a dock mobster...

On the Waterfront, a classic movie, it got Academy Awards, everybody loves it. It’s on every top 100 movie list. It was socially conscious. It was bare-bones filmmaking pulled from the headlines of the day. It was bold. It was daring. It solidified Marlon Brando’s acting rep.
 
Terry Malloy is a rat, a cheese-eater. He’s called it all the way through the picture and there’s a reason for it. On The Waterfront was based on newspaper articles about mob control of the waterfront in Jersey, New York, and Brooklyn called “Crime on the Waterfront” by Malcolm Johnson. Mob control of the waterfront? Albert Anastassia, the lord high executioner, ran the waterfront in those days. He’d be taken out by a barbershop quintet in 1957. Waterfront came out in 1954. Elia Kazan took the newsclips to Arthur Miller to write up a screenplay and then Kazan named names at the House Un-American Activities Committee and Miller told him to go fuck himself. So Kazan pulled in another rat, Budd Schulberg, to write it up.
 
On the Waterfront was Elia Kazan’s apologensia for saying all those rotten things about his pinko friends. But it was no mea culpa. On the surface, Waterfront is a late-era classic gangster movie. Mobsters run the docks. Mobsters run the shylarks. They pretty much run all the action. At the top is Johnny Friendly. A tough guy with a soft spot, ask any rummy on the waterfront. He takes care of his own. And he takes care of anyone who fucks with his own.

I could’a had class. I could’a been a contender. I could’a been somebody. Instead of a bum, which is what I am, let's face it, Charlie

Terry Malloy was a boxer. He took a dive for Johnny Friendly on his brother’s advice and lost a shot a title. He coulda been somebody with a title. Even as a contender, it’s better than never getting a shot at all. Better than throwing fights for short-end cash. That sticks in Terry’s ass. That’s all a cop needs to turn someone. Of course a priest who can order a beer so dramatically and an airy blonde who’s a jiminy cricket in his ear don’t help. Terry’s bombarded all over. You can see he’s not going to hold up to questioning.

But he does. For a while. Then he spills his own personal beef. The thrown fight. All those years ago in the Garden. That fucking fight gets Terry’s brother, Charlie, killed. Charlie goes soft on account of that fight and lets Terry off, for old time’s sake. Can’t do it. That sort of thing gets you hung on a hook in a garage. So that’s enough to make Terry Malloy go rat. Well, that’s the way it usually happens. Joe Valachi didn’t turn stoolie until after the mob got it in their heads that he was and went after him. Nothing sends you running to the warden faster than a shiv in the shower.

Let me pause to give a post-preface. Dead End, from 1937, is my favorite movie. It was since the first time I saw it when I was three or four. That and Yellow Submarine which I saw when I was six. I just loved Dead End and no movie has ever supplanted it as my favorite. I’ve watched almost every film by every actor in Dead End, just because they were in it. Almost, because even with Bogart, he made 78 films, I’ve only been able to catch 62 of them, and I look. But watching Sylvia Sidney in Beetlejuice was a thrill. Her Drina was one of American films' first real strong, independent women. Yeah she goes to Joel McCrea at the end, but only after she lets him know she doesn’t need him. And Dave never goes rat. Sure, he'd go on to kill Baby Face Martin, but he was no squealer. The squealer is perennial Dead End Kid bad apple Leo Gorcey. Gorcey had the chops and the background to go where the other Kids didn't. In Crime School, he was the one who actually committed the murder that got Dead End Kids sent to reform school. They went because they wouldn't squeal. It was important. Dead End had it all. The social commentary, the pro-union, pro-left, anti-establishment posture. Gabe Dell shooting out his crotch in an "eat me" gesture. The little fucking hoodlums on the street. They all knew one thing. You can’t trust a squealer.

You don’t snitch in the playground. You don’t squeal to your teacher. You don’t drop a dime on your co-workers. You don’t narc on your friends and you never ever ever fucking say word one to the cops. Not one. Ever. If they ask you what time it is the most you should muster is a gesture. And not a helpful one. Terry Malloy is a cheese-eating rat. They beat the shit out of him in the end, but they don’t give him the “mark of the squealer.” Isn’t this a Warner Brothers movie? It breaks the cardinal rule of gangster films, just like Mafia five-dollar-guy Joe Valachi broke the first rule of cosa nostra, Omerta.

You gave it to Charlie. Who was one of your own.

This was the first era of the squealer. We saw it again in the late 90s, when canaries took down the five families from upper case to lower case. The new lower case five families make sense under Omerta. You think they were silent before? They’re never going to say another word again. Forget about it and don’t expect any tell-all books from the next Mafia generation either. You know Johnny Tightlips on The Simpsons? He's the new boss. Johnny Friendly was loud and brash, but he kept a clean house. Then that rodent fink fingered him on the stand and he lost his place at the big table. That more than justifies taking him out. Yeah, sure, he hung Charlie up on a hook like anything else on the docks, but he wasn’t taking care of the problem. The problem is the leaky faucet and if you don’t want to use a wrench, don’t give him the fucking gun. It’s on page three of that secret manual that you burned before reading, cos it was that secret. More secret than the saints.

Okay, that’s another thing that did happen a lot in the fifties. When I mentioned Valachi, it was because the situation’s not that different. Terry probably would have kept his mouth shut if they hadn’t killed his brother and they only killed his brother to keep his mouth shut. It really is and was a mob catch-22 that was an unbreakable rule. It happens over and over again in real life mob cases. It’s like a comedian who always takes it one step too far. It’s a bad game of chicken and its stacked in the Feds favor because they hate both sides. The cop on the stairs calls Terry a squealer. The kid kills every single pigeon in the coop. Think about that. That kid in the leather jacket. Twisted the neck of every single pigeon that Terry took care of. Individually. One at a time. That kid loved Terry. But Terry was a rat fuck. Those pigeons had to die. Innocent fucking birds.

And then years later they honor these guys. Wiseguys, goodfellas like Robert De Niro and Joe Pesci went on the Academy Awards to say, hey it’s been years, isn’t it time we forgive Elia Kazan for naming names? And Brando, the fat rat fuck, he was awarded by playing Don Corleone in the greatest mob movie ever. Was that in his witness protection package? Karl Malden yells that Christ is on the docks and Brando gets to be the Christ figure, stumbling three times on his way to shape up for a day’s work. But he’s a squealer. And should wear the mark.

On The Waterfront is a great movie, yeah. Of course. From where you're standing. But I'm over here now. A cheap, lousy, dirty, stinking mug. From a mug's point of view the pic should a 2.0 tops. And even that I'm pushing.

Den of Geek Rating: 5 out of 5 Stars 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

10

The Enigma of Leonardo DiCaprio

$
0
0
FeatureDan Hajducky12/27/2013 at 7:05AM

Here's a look at how one of Hollywood's most popular actors has yet to win the big one.

When an entertainer has built an impressive body of work for himself, he can come to be known by his first name—or in some other cases, a shortened version of that. So when I say "Leo," there is really only one person that comes to mind.
 
For almost twenty-five years (hard to believe), Leonardo DiCaprio has become one of Hollywood’s most gifted and financially successful actors. His total domestic box office haul to date is upwards of $ 2.2 billion and that’s soon to rise, with the release of Martin Scorsese’s The Wolf of Wall Street.
 
 
Leo has crafted an impressive career for himself which started on the early nineties TV show Growing Pains. Soon thereafter (omitting his embarrassing involvement in Critters 3), he moved to big screens playing the mentally-challenged brother of Johnny Depp in What’s Eating Gilbert Grape, a role that earned him an Academy Award nomination. He followed with The Quick and the DeadBasketball Diaries, and then his fame erupted to sex symbol status with Romeo + Juliet and Titanic. Between that one-two punch, Leo became as much a pop culture idol as the actor he intended to be, following them with fangirl bait like The Man in the Iron Mask before returning to “serious” work, such as Danny Boyle’s The Beach (he also appeared in the Woody Allen film Celebrity during this time).
 
While these movies were financially successful, DiCaprio won a Razzie for The Man in the Iron Mask and was nominated for another for The Beach. This early whiff of disrespect for his talent would quickly be suppressed, however, as he has went on to an unparalleled run of films that were both critically and financially successful: Catch Me If You CanGangs of New YorkThe AviatorBlood DiamondThe DepartedBody of LiesRevolutionary RoadShutter IslandInception, J. EdgarDjango Unchained, and The Great Gatsby (DiCaprio also narrated 2007’s The 11th Hour and 2010’s Hubble 3D).
 
DiCaprio seems to have more success in his future; looking past Scorsese’s Wolf, he is also in pre-production of Sinatra—an Old Blue Eyes biopic, directed again by Scorsese—his production company Appian Way Productions has purchased the rights to Erik Larson’s brilliant nonfiction blockbuster The Devil in the White City, and they will also adapt S. Craig Zahler’s crime novel Mean Business on North Granson Street.

For his role in What’s Eating Gilbert Grape?, he received a Best Supporting Actor from the National Board of Review. For Romeo + Juliet, a Silver Bear for Best Actor from the Berlin International Film Festival. Over the years he won a Golden Globe (The Aviator), an Austin Film Critics Association Award, a Central Ohio Film Critics Association Award, a Satellite Award, an Irish Film and TV Award, and another National Board of Review Award (all for The Departed), as well as a Critics Choice Award (Blood Diamond). More recently, he even a Teen Choice Award (Shutter Island) and yet another National Board of Review Award (Django Unchained).
 
For all his success and for all the awards he’s picked up, he’s still never won an Oscar. What a shame!
 
If you Google “Leonardo DiCaprio,” one of the first searches that comes up is: “Leonardo DiCaprio No Oscar.” Social sites such as Tumblr and Tickld feature memes making fun of Leo’s bad luck when award season comes. There are some Tumblr blogs that are dedicated—in meme and gif fashion—to putting a voice to Leo’s lack of recognition. Though the joking began as light and playful, with each passing year, Leo’s when-will-it-happen fandom has grown, becoming a global phenomenon. There have even been numerous fans that have made fake Academy Awards to present to DiCaprio. Though the manufacturing of clay statuettes to present to a multimillionaire, world-famous celebrity is ridiculous (if not touching), the joke has become something more, a serious question, even.
 
When will it happen, and why hasn’t it yet?
 
Why it hasn’t happened yet is probably the first question that should be addressed. The three times that Leo was nominated, he’s been extremely unlucky. At the 66th Academy Awards, Leo lost to Tommy Lee Jones in The Fugitive for Best Supporting Actor, who had been active in film and TV for twenty-three years before receiving the award (Jones also beat out Peter Postlethwaite for In The Name of the Father and Ralph Fiennes for Schindler’s List, quite a feat). At the 77th Academy Awards, Leo was finally up for Best Actor for The Aviator, but there was never any chance that he would win; he was up against Jaime Foxx for Ray, and Ray Charles had passed away only four months before the film’s release. Foxx was a sure thing, with the movie being so well received and his chameleonic portrayal so lauded. At the 79th Academy Awards, DiCaprio (nominated for Best Actor for Blood Diamond) lost to Forest Whitaker for his portrayal of the ruthless Ugandan general Idi Amin. This year, 2006, was the same year as The Departed, and though the gangster drama cleaned up that year like the Feds in a Whitey-set sting operation, Leo wasn’t nominated for that film. Some critics argue that if Leo had actually wanted to campaign for the lead actor nomination, he would have won, riding The Departed's success.
 
 
However, that’s where the Academy Award nominations stop, quite confusingly. DiCaprio was outshined by Daniel Day Lewis in Gangs of New York (who wouldn’t be?). Though he gave a riveting performance in Django Unchained, Christoph Waltz won his second Best Supporting Actor Oscar for the same southern fried spaghetti western. The cast of Inception was stocked (with a scene-stealing Tom Hardy, to boot), and it was a summer blockbuster, so it’s understandable that Leo’s nuanced performance went unnoticed. But the lack of appreciation for his work in Revolutionary RoadShutter IslandJ. Edgar, and The Great Gatsby is baffling. The epic twist of a scene in Shutter Island (uh, years-later spoiler alert?) alone where DiCaprio’s Daniels comes home to find that his deranged wife has drowned his children is a master lesson on what acting is. Though he was recognized for The Aviator with a nomination, I still maintain to this day that he would have won any other year for his role as Howard Hughes; The Aviator was haunting and it showed the world just how good Leo is and can be. So, again, why hasn’t he won?
 
It would appear to be, simply, that Leo (at least in terms of award recognition) is one of the most unlucky men in Hollywood.
 
The Wolf of Wall Street is shaping up to be one of the best films released in 2013 (Rolling Stone has already named it third in its Top Ten films of the year)and it is said by Yahoo, IndieWire, and IMDB—as well as others—that Leo is either a likely or possible nominee for Best Actor. However, again, he appears to be unlucky as it seems he will be up against current frontrunner Chiwetel Ejiofor for the harrowing 12 Years a Slave, Robert Redford (who has never won an acting Oscar in his fifty-four active years) for All Is Lost, two-time Best Actor winner Tom Hanks either for Saving Mr. Banks or Captain Phillips, and either Matthew McConaughey for his metamorphosis in Dallas Buyer’s Club or Bruce Dern for his heart-wrenching turn in Nebraska.
 
Despite the likely success of The Wolf of Wall Street, and the rave reviews that have been coming and will continue to pour in, it seems likely that Leo will again be Oscar-less come March 2014. Will his role as Ol' Blue Eyes in Sinatra be intriguing enough for him to finally take home gold when it comes out?
 
Regardless of when it comes—it has to, one day, doesn’t it?—it appears that something is keeping Leo from achieving the milestone. Or is it that he’s been great in good movies, but hasn’t delivered the sort of earth-shattering role where the actor disappears into the character and is near-unrecognizable that is usually required of a Best Actor?
 
 
What is holding him back, in other words?
 
It’s likely that his early sex symbol status has something to do with it. It is possible that Leomania, around the time of Titanic—as well as legions of teenage girls petitioning for DiCaprio to be nominated for his role as Jack Dawson—could still be fresh in the minds of those in the Academy. Is it too juvenile to say that Leo’s impeccable looks have held him back? It’s possible. The fresh-faced actor beauties that adorn the walls of lovelorn teenage girls aren’t often synonymous with cinematic brilliance.
 
Despite his bankability and reliability of quality, some critics still say that Leo exhibits restraint onscreen. His Howard Hughes was startling and impressive, but we still saw that it was Leo, simply acting as Hughes. His J. Edgar was inspiring, but it did feel like that was it, the performance. His role as Danny Archer, while his adoption of the South African accent was vocal perfection, still wasn’t awe-inspiring. Some say that DiCaprio has yet to deliver the tour-de-force performance that solidifies him as a best actor. When I think of roles like that, career-defining roles, I can’t think of one (outside of Howard Hughes in The Aviator) that defines him. Heath Ledger as The Joker, Daniel Day Lewis as Christy Brown in My Left Foot, as Daniel Plainview in There Will Be Blood, and as Abraham Lincoln, Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter, Christoph Waltz in as Col. Hans Landa…those are career-making performances, roles where cinephiles will buy the DVD just to watch those actors’ scenes in the movie and nothing else. For the life of me, I can’t think of a movie of DiCaprio’s that I would pop in the DVD player only to watch his scenes and love it.
 
DiCaprio is notorious for his selfless charity, as a devoted environmentalist, and for his relentless philanthropy; he doesn’t seem like the type of person that would have a bad reputation in Hollywood, but could that be it? Could his rejection of media hype, his not campaigning for awards, have turned people off to him? Could there be something else, something that has happened behind the scenes that has alienated Leo from voters? It seems unlikely, but the question must be asked.
 
Though it seems likely that DiCaprio will receive a Best Actor statue in his lifetime—unless he takes that leave from acting that he’s hinted at, and it spirals into a lengthy one—one must wonder when it will be, and for what kind of role? Alfred Hitchcock, widely regarded as the best director of all time, never actually received a Best Director Oscar. If Leo never wins the big award, will he be privy to the same fate as Hitchcock, lauded with timeless brilliance despite never winning “The Big One”?
 
As not only a film lover, but as an appreciator of DiCaprio’s decades of magical work, I only have one question after pondering all this.
 
What will Leonardo DiCaprio’s legacy be? Perhaps an Oscar-less one.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Dead Snow: Red vs. Dead Trailer Released in Time for Sundance

$
0
0
NewsTony Sokol12/30/2013 at 12:57PM

Sequel to Dead Snow promises Nazi zombies and - wait, that's enough right there.

Nazi zombies, they’re not like regular zombies. Why, just yesterday during the Breaking Bad marathon they were talking about Nazi zombies and how they’re just plain nasty. Dead Snow; Red vs. Dead got itself those nasty Nazi zombies, but the main character, Colonel Herzog just happens to have a new appendage attached. And it’s got more than that kung fu grip. His new hand is a zombie sledgehammer and he’s going to need it.

Dead Snow: Red Vs. Dead is Tommy Wirkola's (Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters) follow-up to his 2009 zombie classic Dead Snow. The new sequel comes out in anticipation of the Sundance Film Festival. Dead Snow: Red Vs. Dead stars Vegar Hoel, Stig Frode Henriksen, Martin Starr, Ørjan Gamst, Ingrid Haas and Jocelyn DeBoer.

The official synopsis says “If the worst day of your life consisted of accidentally killing your girlfriend with an axe, chain-sawing your own arm off, and watching in horror as your closest friends were devoured by a zombified Nazi battalion, you’d have to assume that things couldn’t get much worse. In Martin’s case, that was only the beginning.”

There’s no release date yet. We’ll be on the watch.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

 

Check Out the First Guardians of The Galaxy Cast Photo

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek12/31/2013 at 8:23PM

We finally get an official look at the cast of Marvel's Guardians Of The Galaxy!

Well, they certainly kept us waiting long enough, didn't they? But now you can get your first look at Zoe Saldana as Gamora, Chris Pratt as Star Lord, Bradley Cooper as Rocket Raccoon, Dave Bautista as Drax the Destroyer, and Vin Diesel as Groot in Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy. Alright, fine...Rocket Raccoon and Groot will only feature the voices of those two actors, but what can you do? This is definitely one of the riskier films on Marvel's agenda, and we're looking forward to seeing more from this throughout 2014!

Guardians of the Galaxy is directed by James Gunn and opens on August 1, 2014. Check out our round-up on Guardians of the Galaxy news right here!

Thanks to ScreenCrush for posting this (and we owe a tip of the hat to Comics Alliance for putting it on our radar).

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


Amazing Spider-Man 2 New Year’s Eve Teaser

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/1/2014 at 4:33PM

Check out The Amazing Spider-Man 2 trailer from last night's New Year celebrations in Times Square!

In case you missed last night’s festive Times Square Ball Drop, and The Amazing Spider-Man 2 teaser that accompanied it, Sony Pictures Entertainment has been good enough to release the teaser of Electro vs. Spidey in the heart of New Year’s celebrations from the upcoming 2014 release. Also enjoy an always celebratory introduction by Stan Lee!
 
 
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 finds Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) fighting for his life against Oscorp’s newest freaks, including Electro (Jamie Foxx) and Rhino (Paul Giamatti), all while trying to balance a high school romance with Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone). Yet, when an old friend named Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan) comes back into his life, the secrets of Norman Osborn (Chris Cooper) and its villainous past reach closer to home than even Spidey can realize. Worse still, they may expand into his future.
 
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 opens May 2, 2014.
 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Dwayne The Rock Johnson in Talks With Warner Bros. for DC Movie Project

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/2/2014 at 10:52AM

Who might Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson be playing in a DC superhero movie?

Well, here's one we missed in all the New Year's Eve excitement. Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson tweeted something rather tantalizing the other day, and it's definitely got our attention. It appears that the former (well...sometimes former) WWE superstar has plans to get in on the superhero movie action over at Warner Bros. Whether it's a hero or a villain remains to be seen, but Rock promises some kind of "badassery."

 

In recent years, The Rock was linked to a Shazam movie, likely as Black Adam, the villain. There's also been loose talk of a Lobo film at some point, a role which Mr. Johnson seems uniquely suited for. Whatever it is, it sounds like it may get moving in 2014...which raises the question: could this be a role in the mysterious (and still lacking an official title) Batman vs. Superman flick that's looking more and more like a Justice League movie every day? The Rock isn't known for keeping quiet, so hopefully we'll hear something soon!

We owe a tip of the hat to Total Film for hipping us to this one, by the way.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

He'll probably be Black Adam or Cyborg.

First Vampire Academy Clip is Here

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/2/2014 at 1:52PM

Watch a new clip about what happens in high school when the fangs come out.

For most people, high school really sucked. But for these teenage succubi, that sounds like Heaven. In the new Mark Waters and Daniel Waters dark teen comedy/romance, Vampire Academy appears to be as much of a subversion as a continuation of the current YA adaptation craze sweeping the studio system.
 
Based on the paranormal romance series written by Richelle Mead, The Weinstein Company’s Vampire Academy film tells the tale of Rose Hathaway (Zooey Deutch) and Lissa Dragomir (Lucy Fry), two 17-year-olds attending a school for mortal, peaceful vampires (Moroi) and their half-human protectors (Dhampirs). That is until they think their lives are in danger in this academy. Rose, a half-vampire guardian-in-training, will do all to protect her friend and vampire princess, Lissa, as well as secure her place as Lissa’s permanent guardian.
 
Watch a clip (released via MTV) below about what happens when mean girls are forced to bare their fangs.
 
 
Vampire Academy is to be released on February 14, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Thor: The Dark World DVD and Blu-Ray Features Revealed

$
0
0
News1/2/2014 at 3:36PM

Details about Thor: The Dark World's home video release, as well as a new Marvel One-Shot, have unexpectedly been revealed.

Thor: The Dark World does not have an official date yet for home release; it does not even have an official list of details and specs as announced by Marvel Studios and Disney. Yet, thanks to the British Board for Film Classification, we now appear to know exactly what to expect from the DVD and Blu-ray release for that Norse superhero, including the name of the next Marvel One-Shot. Yes, beyond making-of content, as well as a sneak peak at the closest upcoming Marvel Studios release—Captain America: The Winter Soldier for these discs—Marvel will continue its classic strategy of releasing One-Shots with a new one entitled “All Hail the King.”
 
What exactly is “All Hail the King?” We are not exactly sure at this point, but one unlikely scenario that we would still love to see is if it were a One-Shot about Loki’s day-to-day life as “King Odin.” There could be some real comedy gold in how Lo-din interacts with his subjects.
 
Following this inadvertent unspooling of info, Marvel has released a trailer for the Blu-ray and Digital HD release of Thor: The Dark World.
 
The full list of features can be seen below:
 
ALL HAIL THE KING - A MARVEL ONE-SHOT
A BROTHERS JOURNEY - THOR & LOKI (PART 1)
A BROTHERS JOURNEY - THOR & LOKI (PART 2)
EXCLUSIVE LOOK - CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER
SCORING THOR: THE DARK WORLD WITH BRYAN TYLER
DELETED & EXTENDED SCENES: EXTENDED CELEBRATION SCENE
DELETED & EXTENDED SCENES: JANE LEARNS ABOUT THE AETHER
DELETED & EXTENDED SCENES: LOKI: THE FIRST AVENGER
DELETED & EXTENDED SCENES: THOR AND FRIGGA DISCUSS LOKI
DELETED & EXTENDED SCENES: DARK ELVES PREPARE FOR BATTLE
DELETED & EXTENDED SCENES: EXTENDED VANAHEIM SCENE
EXTENDED CELEBRATION SCENE COMMENTARY BY ALAN TAYLOR & KRAMER MOREGENTHAU
JANE LEARNS ABOUT THE AETHER COMMENTARY BY ALAN TAYLOR & KRAMER MOREGENTHAU
LOKI: THE FIRST AVENGER COMMENTARY BY TOM HIDDLESTON
THOR AND FRIGGA DISCUSS LOKI COMMENTARY BY KEVIN FEIGE
DARK ELVES PREPARE FOR BATTLE COMMENTARY BY KEVIN FEIGE
GAG REEL
THOR THE DARK WORLD AUDIO COMMENTARY

 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Sherlock Holmes: 25 Legendary Performances

$
0
0
Odd ListGerri Mahn1/3/2014 at 8:22AM

You don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to get clued in on these portrayals of the famed violin playing, coke-sniffing detective.

Fans of the great detective are typically familiar with Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s original stories. They also know that those stories have been published, republished, and then published again. Sherlock Holmes is THE classic character who has found his place on the page, on the stage, on the big screen and the small. He has been repackaged, reformatted, revamped, reimagined, and rebooted. But when the writer’s work is done, who makes the man? Den of Geek takes a look back at the top 25 iconic actors who have breathed new life into irrepressible Sherlock Holmes for the past 113 years!

25. Actor Unknown
Got a clue in: Sherlock Holmes Baffled (Short Film 1900)
 

This short, silent film was originally produced by Arthur Marvin for Mutoscope and features a 30 second running time. While the story has no real plot, with Holmes coming face to face with a thief who can make a bag of stolen goods appear and disappear, it was not meant to mimic Doyle’s stories so much as cameo a famous character for the arcade. Long thought lost, the film was rediscovered in 1968 (and is available online). Thus our unknown actor has the distinction of being the first Sherlock Holmes on film!

24. Mack Sennett
Got a clue in: about a dozen Sherlock silent films (1911-1913)
 

A clown, comedian, and peddler of fine (old timey) female flesh (the “Sennett Bathing Beauties”), Sennett was a definitely a man who liked to laugh. He got the chance to show off his acting chops as Holmes in eleven silent films. Sort of. While these films were still comedies, they gave their star the distinction of being one of the first identifiable actors to portray the iconic character on film.

23. William Gillette
Got a clue in: Sherlock Holmes (Silent Film, 1916)
 

Gillette was the first actor to lend gravitas to the character while on screen. Although historians have observed that the mystery actor in “Sherlock Holmes Baffled” based his own performance on Gillette’s earlier stage representation of the great detective! In fact, Gillette was the first actor to put on the now iconic deerstalker hat and curved pipe. While Doyle never specifically said Holmes wore the deerstalker, Watson described him as wearing an ear-flap cap in some of the narrative.

22. John Barrymore
Got a clue in: Sherlock Holmes (Film, 1922)   
 

Best known for being the grandfather of adorable modern day actress Drew Barrymore, John was also a bit of a tool. Sure he survived the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, but then he went around reporting bogus stories in an effort to capitalize on the tragedy! Still, John brought some much needed sex appeal to Holmes, in this loosely adapted version of William Gillette’s play. Another silent film thought lost, the feature was rediscovered in the 1970s, restored, and re-released on blue ray in 2011!

21. Raymond Massey
Got a clue in: The Speckled Band (Film, 1931)
 

Raymond Massey; Canadian military veteran, stage actor (making his acting debut for the troops in Siberia), and director has the distinction of starring in the first Sherlock Holmes talkie. While not the first sound film (that was The Jazz Singer which opened in 1927), The Speckled Band was still on the cutting edge of technological advancement for its time. Especially when you consider that at the time, more than half of the films screened worldwide were still silent.

20. Basil Rathbone
Got a clue in: virtually every Sherlock film imaginable and TV series (1939-1953)
 

This shocked me. When I think of Basil Rathbone, I think of the pointy-chinned pirate, Levasseur, fencing with Errol Flynn in the 1935 film Captain Blood. But as it turns out, Rathbone starred as Sherlock Holmes in 14 feature films and a television series. Rathbone pretty much defined the character during the mid-20th century. Only his was a Holmes for the modern audience, a man who fought Moriarty AND Nazis. This was one busy detective! Fun fact: Eve Titus named “The Great Mouse Detective” for this somewhat high strung incarnation of Holmes.

19. Alan Napier
Got a clue in: The Speckled Band (TV, 1949)
 

Best known for his role as Batman’s butler Alfred on the 1966 television series, Napier got his turn as the great detective long before. The half-hour long episode was part of a dramatic television series based on stories by famous authors (Doyle, Twain, Dickens, etc.). Unfortunately the series was short-lived and Napier, an Oxford educated actor, had to resign himself to sharing his dignified screen presence with a paunchy Adam West.

18. Ronald Howard
Got a clue in: Sherlock Holmes (TV, 1954-1955)
 

Another landmark in Holmes history, Ronald Howard has the distinction of being the first Sherlock in a made for syndication television series for the U.S. His version of the adventures of Sherlock Holmes was markedly different from that of his predecessors, and Howard went out of his way to set himself apart from the iconic performance of Basil Rathbone. His Holmes was less neurotic and much more deliberate. The series also deviated from Doyle’s stories, with my favorite example being “The Case of the Texas Cowgirl.”

17. Peter Cushing
Got a clue in: The Hound of the Baskervilles (Film, 1959), Sherlock Holmes (TV, 1965-1968) The Masks of Death (TV Film, 1984)
 

The iconic Mr. Cushing, best known for his work in Hammer Horror films (and the Doctor Who Dalek films), helped bring classic Gothic horror to Holmes. Cushing, like Christopher Lee or Vincent Price, was practically an acting institution. He was a fan of Doyle’s work, and brought his knowledge of the text to bear on both the film and the later television series. Even though we are adrift on a sea of Sherlock films and series, Cushing’s The Hound of the Baskervilles is considered to be a cult classic.

16. Sir Christopher Lee
Got a clue in: Sherlock Holmes and the Deadly Necklace (Film, 1962), Incident at Victoria Falls, Sherlock Holmes and the Leading Lady (TV Film, 1992)
 

Fun fact: Christopher Lee starred opposite Cushing in the above mentioned, 1959 Hound of the Baskervilles as Sir Henry Baskerville. Like Cushing, Lee was best known for his work in horror (and more recently for old man fighting with Yoda and, later, with Ian McKellan in LoTR). Unfortunately his first run as the great detective was a great disappointment. Neither Lee nor the director were pleased with the end result. Lee would go on to take the role of Mycroft Holmes in The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes before reprising his role as an aged and retired Holmes in 1992.

15. John Neville
Got a clue in: A Study in Terror (Film, 1965)
 

Another entirely original story line, which found Neville’s Holmes hot on the trail of Jack the Ripper. Considering how much the Ripper murders had enflamed the public during the late 1880s, it is surprising that Doyle did not employ such a case in his own writing. This film was also the inspiration for Manly Wade Wellson’s novel, Sherlock Holmes’s War of the Worlds. For his efforts, Neville was praised for a Rathbone-esq performance. 

14. George C. Scott
Got a clue in: They Might Be Giants (Film, 1971)
 

It is hard to imagine General Patton doing comedy, much less playing a bumbling and quixotic character who imagines himself as a modern day Holmes. But it happened. Somewhat of an anomaly, this film still deserves a place on this list for no other reason than its cult classic gravitas. Plus it is too easy to picture Scott slapping his would be Watson for crying at a crime scene.

13. John Cleese
Got a clue in: Elementary, My Dear Watson (TV, 1973), The Strange case of the End of Civilization as We Know It (Film, 1977)
 

Ah the 70’s. A great time for comedy and a better time for spoofs of Sherlock Holmes. Cleese, of Monty Python fame, was an obvious choice to take on this particular version of the great detective. Both the television series and the film take aim at the formulaic plots, outrageous deductions by Holmes, and general buffoonery by Watson that had come to plague so many of the 20th century incarnations of Doyle’s iconic character.

12. Roger Moore
Got a clue in: Sherlock Holmes in New York (TV Film, 1976) 
 
Roger Moore made a name for himself playing characters who solved mysteries of one stripe or another. In The Saint he was a detective/thief, in The Pursuaders he was a playboy millionaire/detective, in James Bond” he was a spy/playboy, and in Sherlock Holmes in New York he was a detective and the father of Irene Adler’s illegitimate son. A Victorian film set in New York City and made notable by the presence of Roger Moore’s own son, Geoffrey Moore, who played the role of Adler’s son (who would no doubt require therapy later in life). 

11. Christopher Plummer
Got a clue in: Silver Blaze (TV Film, 1977) Murder by Decree (Film, 1979)
 

Captain Von Trapp made the notable decision to play up the great detective’s drug addiction when he played him in this adaption of Doyle’s work, which stayed true to the original. While Plummer would go on to reprise his role of Holmes, Silver Blaze also starred Thorley Walters, who had played Watson in four separate films.

10. Peter Cook
Got a clue in: The Hound of the Baskervilles (Film, 1978)
 

Peter Cook was one half of a famous comedic double act, and Dudley Moore was the other. It is no surprise then, to discover that Moore played Watson to Cook’s Holmes. Not for the refined or stuffy fan of the great detective, this particular comedy relies heavily on low brow humor, employing Chihuahua pee and vomiting brought on by demonic possession.

9. Vasily Livanov
Got a clue in: The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes (Film Series 1979-1986)
 

Yes, these are Russian adaptations, but it is worth noting that Livanov’s performances are considered the best representations of Sherlock Holmes – ever. Better than Rathbone, and that is saying something!

8. Frank Langella
Got a clue in: Sherlock Holmes (TV Film, 1981)
 

Originally a Williamstown Theater Production, Langella’s stage version of Holmes was filmed as part of the HBO series Standing Room Only. And it was as riveting as you might imagine watching a play on television might be. The stage design and acting style which had worked so well for a theater with 600 seats did not hold up on the small screen. Fun fact: this was another adaption of William Gillette’s play and is available on YouTube if you care to judge Langella’s performance for yourself!

7. Tom Baker
Got a clue in: The Hound of the Baskervilles (TV Mini Series, 1982)

Tom Baker is perhaps best known as the fourth Doctor from Doctor Who; and in one episode donned the deerstalker hat of our great detective. He picked up the reins on this BBC series from Peter Cushing, although the general consensus is that he should have left the role of Holmes to his predecessor.

6. Peter O’Toole
Got a clue in: Sherlock Holmes and the Baskerville Curse, A Study in Scarlet, The Sign of Four, the Valley of Fear (Animated TV Films, 1983)

Lawrence of Arabia brings Sherlock Holmes to life, sort of. O’Toole leant his voice to this animated series. I scoured the web, but this appears to be the first time the great detective was animated. Challenge to all you Sherlock geeks: was there an animated series that predates this BBC production?

5. Michael Caine
Got a clue in: Without a Clue (Film, 1988)

Another comedy, this time pairing Michael Caine’s Holmes with Ben Kingsley’s Watson. Sort of. In this spoof the great detective is actually a fiction written by Dr. Watson and brought to life by Caine who plays an otherwise out of work stage actor. The best part of the work is the role reversal between Watson and Holmes in addition to the acknowledgement that even Doyle himself grew tired of his trademark character.

4. Charlton Heston
Got a clue in: The Crucifer of Blood (Film, 1991)

Adapted by Paul Giovanni from Doyle’s The Sign of the Four, this theater production showed on Broadway and in L.A., where it starred Charlton Heston. Heston then went on to reprise his role in the film version, which was directed by his son Fraser Clarke Heston.

3. Robert Downey Jr.
Got a clue in: Sherlock Holmes, Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (Film, 2009, 2011)

Robert Downey Jr. has set himself apart from the previous actors to portray Sherlock Holmes by being scrappy. Ridiculously scrappy. Kick your ass in a dark alley scrappy. In real life, Downey has a reputation of being a nice guy, but he also drew heavily on personal experiences to bring his detective to life. Particularly, his practice of Wing Chun, a southern Chinese style of kung fu recently the popularized by Donnie Yen and his “Ip Man” series. Full disclosure, my husband has taught this style of martial arts for years. And according to him, Downey knows his stuff. Which added a nice air of authenticity to an otherwise over the top couple of films.

2. Benedict Cumberbatch
Got a clue in: Sherlock (TV, 2010)

This short run BBC series that has fans clamoring for more embraces the modern audience’s love of the crime procedural drama, and focuses on Cumberbatch’s insufferable (yet somehow adorable) personality disorder riddled Holmes. He is like a British version of Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory. The series pairs Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman (who also star in Peter Jackson’s new Hobbit trilogy) to great effect. 

1. Jonny Lee Miller
Got a clue in: Elementary (TV, 2012)

And finally the latest in our long line of detectives. Miller manages to put even more of a modern spin on Holmes than Cumberbatch. Scruffy and a bit unhinged, he reminds this viewer of an infinitely sexier Monk. Unfortunately, rabid fan trolling being what it is, the show has been overshadowed by the (completely objective) horror that some people felt upon learning that Watson would be played by Lucy Liu, who despite her talent as an actress, had committed the unforgivable sins of being both a WOMAN and NOT WHITE. Get a grip kids, Holmes has been alive and kicking for well over 100 years, and I expect we will see a great deal more in terms of innovative reimagining over the next 100 years of the character’s history!

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

What about Jeremy Brett?

How on earth is Jeremy Brett not on this list!

This list and it's descriptions of actors (John Barrymore is best known for being Drew Barrymore's Grandfather? Really?) is just sad to read. I weep for my generation.

Elementary BLOWS, BBC Sherlock is better in EVERY WAY. You also have RDJ Sherlock WAY to high, his movies are good but do not really capture Sherlock, it more of a generic detective named Sherlock.

Jeremy Brett!!

Surprised not to see Nicol Williamson in the Seven Percent Solution.

Even though many have already mentioned it, the absence of Jeremy Brett really is a glaring omission. He is still one of the most popular incarnations of the series, and one of the most faithful to the books.

Good point out. Just because I enjoy Sherlock does not make me a detective.

No Douglas Wilmer?

Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>