Quantcast
Channel: Movies – Den of Geek
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live

The 12 finest movie villains of 2013

$
0
0
Odd ListRyan Lambie1/3/2014 at 8:27AM

They made us boo and hiss, and maybe made us like them a little bit, too. Here's our rundown of our favourite 2013 movie villains...

NB: The following contains spoilers. If you stumble on an entry for a movie you haven't seen yet, you're advised to skip to the next one.

We love them, we hate them, and sometimes, we love to hate them. Villains are the driving force of just about every story, and there was no shortage of great ones in 2013's movies. Whether they were violent and weapon waving, or quiet and slyly insinuating, last year's films were full of great antagonists of every sort.

You're sure to have some of your own ideas over who deserved to be listed among 2013's best baddies (so feel free to add yours in the comments, as ever), and honourable mentions  should go to James Woods' Martin Walker in White House Down and Cameron Diaz's Malkina in The Counsellor. But at any rate, here's our pick of the finest movie villains of last year.

Butch Cavendish - The Lone Ranger

We remain quietly addicted to the reliably brilliant William Fichtner's performances, and he was really on form in Gore Verbinski's larger-than-life western, The Lone Ranger. Perhaps realising that he had to play against Johnny Depp with a dead bird on his head, Fichtner appears to put every sinew into his turn as vicious outlaw Butch Cavendish. With his gruesome complexion, curious teeth and snake-like stare, he's a fearsome creation, and one scene of cannibalism remains among the more unexpectedly harsh movie theater moments of last year.

Reactions towards The Lone Ranger were mixed to say the least, and audiences failed to queue up for it in the way they did for Verbinski's Pirates Of The Caribbean movies, but none of this detracts from Fitchner's performance - as ever, he brings menace, humor and personality to what could have been just another stock villain.

Agent Kruger - Elysium

In director Neill Blomkamp's second feature, Elysium, Sharlto Copley switched from the quirkily affecting anti-hero of 2009's District 9 to outright villainy. And as Agent Kruger, the hirsute assassin who does the bidding of Jodie Foster's snootily brittle Defense Secretary Delacourt, Copley pretty much walks away with the movie thanks to his raving performance.

While Matt Damon is saddled with a likeable but somewhat anonymous everyman hero character, Copley gets to fire and fling a variety of exotic weapons, has a temper tantrum during a lonely barbecue on the roof of his own house, and yells "It's just a flesh wound!" at a victim he's just blown to smithereens.

Kruger isn't exactly the most sly or subtle villains of the year, but he's definitely one of the most fun to watch - just look at the moment where he comes stomping down the corridor of the title space station, headlights glaring out from each of his man chests. It makes us chuckle every time we see it.

Smaug - The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug

We waited a long, long time before we finally got to see Peter Jackson's version of Tolkien's gold-obsessed dragon, and thankfully, it was more than worth the wait. As voiced and partly performed (via the miracle of motion capture) by the seemingly indefatigable Benedict Cumberbatch, Smaug is a villain of both wit and menace - and vitally, Jackson gives him a grand entrance.

That first glimpse of Smaug, who's revealed one scale at a time as the mountain of gold he's lying beneath gradually falls away, is a great introduction, showing us how gigantic he is compared to the diminutive Bilbo (Martin Freeman). Freeman's scene with the returning Gollum in An Unexpected Journey was one of the highlights of that movie, and in The Desolation Of Smaug, WETA once again created a masterful interplay between live actors and CG characters.

Most importantly, though, there's Cumberbatch's sonorous voice growling out from behind all those pixels - and it's this, as much as technical wizardry, that brings this timeless villain so memorably to life. And while we were in two minds as to whether we should include Cumberbatch's villain John Harrison in Star Trek Into Darkness on this list, we decided that, although the former's a great adversary in his own right, he's roundly eclipsed by this incarnation of fantasy's most famous dragon.

The Mandarin - Iron Man 3

Drew Pearce and Shane Black's handling of longstanding comic book antagonist the Mandarin was always going to be controversial for some, but for us, it worked magnificently. Just as Tony Stark wrestles with his own demons in the wake of The Avengers' events, so enigmatic terrorist the Mandarin turns out to be a mirage created to strike fear into the population of America.  

Ben Kingsley is great value in his twin roles as the Mandarin and booze-addled British actor Trevor Slattery, and while some would argue that the villain deserved a more respectful handling on the big screen, it nevertheless provided one of the funniest and most surprising rug-pull moments in 2013 mainstream movie theater.

Uncle Charlie - Stoker

Director Park Chan-wook's first English-language movie was an ice-cold and visually sumptuous thriller in the Hitchcock mold, and the quality of its performances and production really lifted it from being just another genre movie to something far more complex and symbolic. Matthew Goode plays the handsome and seemingly benign Uncle Charlie, who shows up at the remote, rambling house of his niece India (Mia Wasikowska) and late brother's wife Evelyn (Nicole Kidman).

Although it's evident that something dark lingers behind Uncle Charlie's broad smile, Park Chan-wook keeps the suspense taut, and Goode's turn here is perfectly restrained - we know there's something not quite right about him, and we're just waiting to see when the mask will finally slip. In a movie full of great acting - Wasikowska and Kidman are both excellent - Goode is a vitally brilliant part in Chan-wook's twisted love triangle.

Calvin J Candie - Django Unchained

Before finally settling down in a theater to watch Quentin Tarantino's Django Unchained, we were anxiously wondering whether the fresh-faced Leonardo DiCaprio was really right for the role of the brutal Mississipi plantation owner Calvin J Candie - especially considering he'd have to share one major scene with Christoph Waltz, who blazed through the screen as Hans Landa in Inglourious Basterds.

As it turns out, we needn't have worried; in every one of Tarantino's lengthy scenes with the character, DiCaprio is seldom less than pitch-perfect. The dinner table with Christoph Waltz's Dr King Schultz and Jamie Foxx's Django is electrifying, with Candie's horrifying monologue laced with menace.

In fact, DiCaprio became so immersed in the moment that he famously injured his hand when he slammed his hand down on the table, breaking a glass - the wound ultimately required stitches, but his unblinking performance remains in the movie.

Mizuki - 47 Ronin

Here's a late entry to the list, and a character who's the exact opposite of the one Japanese actress Rinko Kikuchi brought to the screen in her other major movie of 2013, Pacific Rim. In director Carl Rinsch's flawed yet entertaining fantasy samurai movie, Kikuchi plays Mizuki, a witch whose magic helps central villain Lord Kira to bring about his plans to dominate a tract of 18th century Japan.

Although Tadanobu is perfectly entertaining as said villain, it's Mizuki who emerges as the most memorable and downright fun character in the entire movie. She's a slithering sorceress who can transform herself into a menagerie of creatures, conjure up deadly purple spiders from surprising places, and gets to generally antagonise every other player in the story.

Kikuchi attacks the role with evident glee, and the sense of  fun she has as Mizuki lifts every scene in which she appears.

Polite Leader - The Purge

This mash-up of dystopia, horror and home invasion flick was by no means perfect, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't have plenty of good things going for it, not least a superb turn from Rhys Wakefield as its central villain.

Ethan Hawke plays James Sandin, the father to a wealthy middle-class family in a near-future America, where an annual event called the Purge gives citizens a 12-hour period where they can commit whatever crime they like. But when a group of feral thrill seekers turns its attention on Sandin's household, he's forced to resort to extreme measures to protect his loved ones.

Like Smaug, Wakefield's nameless villain is given a superb introduction. A leader to a masked group of impeccably dressed killers, he's first seen through a distorted fish-eye lens on Sandin's front door. Then he takes off his ghoulishly grinning mask, revealing that the face beneath is even more leering and scary.

That image proved to be effective enough to lead the movie's advertising campaign, and it's made all the more powerful because Wakefield's performance is so economical - the bit where he smilingly explains why he has the right to kill Sandin's entire family is, in the midst of a sometimes uneven genre movie, utterly chilling.

Crystal - Only God Forgives

There certainly aren't any heroes in Nicolas Winding Refn's Only God Forgives, where it's almost always night time and karaoke cops mete out brutal acts of bloodshed. Yet even among the movie's minimalist (and divisive) landscape of retribution and despair, Kristin Scott Thomas' glowering gangster matriarch emerges as its darkest shadow.

Much of what Crystal says can't safely be repeated on a family site such as this, but it's sufficient to report that she has her own brand of acid-tongued putdowns. The key scene where she sits down for an extraordinarily uneasy meal with her monosyllabic son, Julian (Ryan Gosling) and his girlfriend Mai (Rhatha Phongam) makes for painfully uncomfortable viewing, and it's interesting to note that, in a movie full of wince-inducing violence, it's Crystal's cajoling, bullying performance that emerges as one of its most unforgettable aspects.

Or for a further illustration of Crystal's fearsome nature, just look at the scene where Julian describes the cruel murder his brother committed on an innocent girl. "I'm sure he had his reasons," she coldly shoots back. Brrr.

President Snow - The Hunger Games: Catching Fire

Donald Sutherland’s President Snow doesn’t get much screen time in The Hunger Games movies, but crikey, he makes the most of it. Sutherland’s clearly feeling the importance of working on a project that talks to a relatively young audience about ultra serious things. And Snow, a man who quietly oozes power, is the archetypal man in power who will do whatever it takes to preserve it.

More to the point, he’ll do whatever it takes using some cunning, often passive-aggressive tactics to do so. Manipulative and almost living under the skin, we suspect we’ll be talking about his performance in the next Hunger Games movie this time next year too...

Trent Ramsey - The Way, Way Back

One of the most wonderful gems of the summer movie theater season, The Way, Way Back not only provided a golden role for Sam Rockwell, but it also proved once more the range of Steve Carell. He’s come a long way since the days of Dunder Miflin, and here, he creates one of the most compelling villains of the year. He’s compelling because in many respects he’s so normal. He plays Trent, the new man in the life of Duncan’s (played by Liam James) mother.

And while he starts off as the friendly, wanting-to-get-to-know-you type, he gradually french fries away at Duncan, undermining him and inflicting subtle, knowing damage. It’s a controlled performance from a skilled actor. And by pulling back and being so believable in his work, Carell creates one of the very best antagonists of the year.

Edwin Epps - 12 Years A Slave

There’s hardly an abundance of pleasant people in Steve McQueen’s 12 Years A Slave. On the surface, Benedict Cumberbatch’s William Ford is quite a good person, but the movie does point out that for all his niceties, he still keeps Chiwitel Ejiofor’s Solomon as his slave. Yet Michael Fassbender’s Edwin Epps chills to the bone (edging out an excellent turn from Paul Dano too). Epps is overt in beliefs on slavery, and how he feels he’s entitled to treat 'his' slaves.

Cruel and abusive, Fassbender plays the character straight and unpleasant, a man contained within what he believes – and, to be fair, many around him – to be reasonable. His vile actions are ones you can sense are coming, but their power is never diluted. Epps isn’t a character you’d want to spend any more time in the company of. Fassbender’s work, however, is outstanding.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing! 

Disqus - noscript

Where's Khan in Star Trek: Into Darkness?

Khan wasn't the villain. Peter Weller was the villain.

The lead pirate in Captain Phillips

Khan sucked in into Darkness

You forgot HARLAN DEGROAT - WOODY HARRELSON - should be at least #2. **Out of the Furnace"

yeah, khan was a whitewash. cumberbatch is getting all the villain roles, simialr to how mark strong got the same treatment. eh


The Veronica Mars movie gets a trailer

$
0
0
TrailerRyan Lambie1/3/2014 at 8:29AM

Kristen Bell returns to her role as a private investigator in the forthcoming Veronica Mars movie - and here's a new trailer to prove it...

As a gage of lingering fan affection, the Veronica Mars Kickstarter campaign was a huge success. Soaring past its initial goal within its first day, screenwriter Rob Thomas' movie project ultimately accumulated $5.7m, meaning that, almost seven years after the TV series abruptly finished in 2007, viewers could finally look forward to a proper conclusion.

Nine months or so on, and here's the first trailer for the forthcoming Veronica Mars movie, which sees Kristen Bell reprise her role as the former high school detective. There are returning faces, some unexpected cameos, and a new murder to solve in Veronica's hometown, Neptune. And who knows? If the movie's a success, maybe this won't be the last we've seen of Bell's sleuth on the big screen after all.

Veronica Mars is out on the 14th March in the US. If a UK movie theater date becomes available, we'll be sure to pass it along.

THR

Disqus - noscript

OMG!! Nerdy Awesome!! Love this!!

Dusting off the old Seasons for a re-watch in preparation YES!!!!!

Why The Wolf of Wall Street Ain’t No Goodfellas

$
0
0
FeatureDavid Crow1/3/2014 at 8:31AM

Wolf of Wall Street is exactly the movie it needs to be with the people who control the economy; for Scorsese that's worse than any wiseguy.

The Wolf of Wall Street is a good movie; it’s probably even a great one. Yet, there is something about this picture that makes the fierce cocaine-fueled frenzy surrounding it seem well earned…if misplaced. This movie is exactly what it needs to be, and that is why so many are struggling to keep it at anything other than arm’s length.
 
Decadent, excessive, and lascivious, The Wolf of Wall Street has whipped up just as many fans as it has moral majority naysayers, ready to tut-tut the 71-year-old Martin Scorsese for making such a dirty movie. And while the legendary auteur is no stranger to disapproving criticism—the religious outrage over The Last Temptation of Christ buried that 1988 film—it is doubtful that even he could have expected a screenwriting member of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences to purportedly come up to him after a screening at the Academy’s Samuel Goldwyn Theater and shout, “Shame on you! Disgusting!” Even Paramount Pictures could only downplay the incident by stating that initial accounts that this was screamed at the Raging Bull filmmaker were exaggerated—it wasn’t technically a scream.
 
The media narrative of condemnation forming around this movie has become so intense that star Leonardo DiCaprio had to celebrate the New Year by doing some damage control when he sat down with Deadline to explain, “Not everyone is going to get it.” And frankly, I agree with DiCaprio’s overall summation about the movie being a darkly comic (and horrifying) attempt to gain insight into why these people live the way that they do. It is completely understandable that a victim of Jordan Belfort’s ponderous narcissism, as well as her own father, would take justifiable offense at this kind of peak behind the curtain of the unending golden roar in the land of bulls and bears. However, just as Scorsese and author/co-screenwriter Nicholas Pileggi attempted to make the gangster movie from the “soldier in Napoleon’s army” point of view with Goodfellas, The Wolf of Wall Street by its very pure, undiluted nature must view these repellently poor excuses for human beings on their own terms. To understand how any group of monsters in men’s clothing—who not-so-hilariously hold the fate of the global economy in their Quaalude-shaking hands in this most recent example—can exist in our world, Scorsese has long found it best to not pass moral judgment with his camera or screenplay. He’ll let the characters hang themselves with their own silk satin ropes.
 
 
This unapologetically brazen, go-big-or-go-home approach to filmmaking is increasingly rare in a studio system dominated by sequels and superheroes, leading many critics and movie buffs to enthusiastically embrace this picture as the unofficial successor to Goodfellas and Casino, two movies that also were once accused of “glorifying” mob violence by those who failed to realize that there was a reason every character ended up dead, in prison, or in witness protection by the end of those flicks. Painted on epic, decade-spanning canvases that were never defined by any rule of moviemaking, that mafia duet served as a glaring inspiration for what The Wolf of Wall Street hoped to do about the godfathers of the stock market; killers of industry in even nicer suits. Hence the unsurprising raves, be it from Forbes or The Stranger, that this is Scorsese’s best since Goodfellas.
 
But this ain’t no Goodfellas.
 
In many ways, Goodfellas served as a return for Scorsese to the demons he first exhumed in Mean Streets (1973). With that earlier classic picture, Scorsese famously posited that his nihilistic view of New York was all he had to say about the wiseguys and goombahs he witnessed going down the dark path while growing up in Little Italy during the mid-20th century. When he finally returned to the “genre” in 1990, it was more from the perspective of a filmmaker who wanted to chronicle why that life would be so enticing, as well as unpack the self-rationalizations that allowed its travelers to be blindsided by its ever abrupt, bloody end.
 
 
To tell this story, Goodfellas is comprised of unbridled cinematic confidence that threw out the NYU rulebook that the director and editor Thelma Schoomaker practically wrote. Eye-lines could be broken, continuity errors and jarring jump cuts were not only acceptable, they were mandated. With deceptive ease, the movie could drift from the voice over narration of protagonist Henry Hill (Ray Liotta) to wife Karen (Lorraine Bracco) without explanation or warning, sometimes even in the same scene. Goodfellas just wasn’t scored to entirely contemporary pop songs of each era a scene was set in; it was designed from the page up to use music as an oblique commentary on the characters. Scorsese would infamously scribble down songs he’d have in mind on the script’s margins, and even go so far as to photograph non-dialogue scenes to musical playback. This approach led to cinematic moments so perfect that whenever The Crystals’ “Then He Kissed Me” is played on the radio, it is impossible not to think of the seamless steadicam shot of Henry and Karen walking into the Copacabana; nor can the Derek and the Dominos’ piano exit to “Layla” be sampled without shivers of frozen wiseguy corpses encroaching the mind.
 
 
Goodfellasand to a lesser extent Casino, were films meant to explain why this kind of evil, depravity, and revulsion could persist within our culture. Yet nonetheless, Scorsese would not deny affection for some of these characters. Joe Pesci may have won the Oscar for playing a complete sociopath like Tommy in Goodfellas, but the movie lived and died by how seduced viewers were into Henry Hill’s perspective. As Henry was the one who cut a deal with the FBI, his version of events will always be dubious. But as a work of art separate from reality, the 1990 movie can trick us into rooting and empathizing with a violent, reprehensible, heroin-dealing killer. But unlike most gangster movies, it is not meant to glamorize the lifestyle. Rather, it convinces the audience that they too “always have wanted to be a gangster," and then methodically takes that away from them until they are left with a coked-up Henry receiving a death sentence from childhood friend Jimmy (Robert De Niro) who has “a job” for him down in Florida…coincidentally around the same time that Henry got pinched by the feds.
 
 
Marty grew up with proverbial Jimmys, Tommys, and Henrys in his neighborhood and around his orbit. He has no such compassion for Wall Street confidence men. DiCaprio picked up the rights for the film in 2007 when he outbid Brad Pitt, but the post-2008 crash’s disgust is all over the actors’ and filmmakers’ approach to the material. The disdain is so dripping from every frame that it should not have taken DiCaprio’s candid Deadline interview for him to spell out, “None of the people that made this movie likes these people, at all.” The specter of 2008 hovers above The Wolf of Wall Street like an armada of golden parachutes that escaped another flailing Gulfstream V.
 
That is not to say the movie is preachy. It does not pass judgment on these people in any overt way. Indeed, the comical absurdity this movie uses to view a group of folks who throw wild orgies in the office on the dime of the plumbers and working class electricians they just bankrupted is the only way to even stomach watching such wanton greed. If Oliver Stone’s Wall Street (1987) played out like a capitalistic opera in which Gordon Gekko was a Milton-esque Devil ready to claim Bud Fox’s soul, then The Wolf of Wall Street is a wise counterbalance that enters a stage that’s long forgotten what morality even is, much less how to strip it from one of its ravenous disciples. DiCaprio’s Jordan Belfort isn’t the tragedy of a man who lost his soul; he’s a portrait of a person who never had one to begin with.
 
Beyond the danger of this lifestyle, the movie is obsessed with the endless excess within it. Everything is likewise intentionally overdone about Wolf of Wall Street, including its nearly 3-hour running time and gratuitous use of nudity and sex. This blunt style also leads to moments of clarity and stunning, giggling brilliance, such as the already infamous Quaalude vignette that features Jordan’s failed attempt to drive home while under the heavy influence of his precious “Lemons.” In a movie where Jonah Hill placing a seemingly live goldfish in his mouth is one of the more restrained sequences, this is obviously about making a point.
 
 
And that point is that they’re vile. So vile that the only things they seem to care about are money, sex, money, drugs, and more money: Everything else is negotiable. This sort of vapidity is so egregious for most people—whether it is because they hate riding the proverbial subway or not—that it is hard to ever once cheer for Jordan Belfort or sympathize with any of his many, many, many, many failings as a father, husband, employer, American or worthwhile human being. Scorsese and DiCaprio clearly have no pity for a man who’s staggering selfishness can only be comprehended in the confines of “comedy.” It appears the filmmakers are also turned off by these creeps. And if they can’t find the humanity, how can viewers?
 
This is likely what will keep The Wolf of Wall Street from becoming one of the all-time greats like the always breathlessly praised Goodfellas. That gangster drama had no illusions about who these men were, but in the hands of a filmmaker who had more than a passing knowledge of their sort, they could be witnessed as caring husbands, family men or at least friends. And when they inevitably failed in every single one of those aforementioned categories by credit’s (or bullet’s) end, it hurt. This worked because we could be seduced into seeing things Henry Hill’s way, if only for the first 45 minutes or so. Audiences never fall for Jordan Belfort’s distortions, nor do the filmmakers. The neutrality with which Wolf approaches its authenticity gives us a glimpse of that mindset, but achieves it without beaconing or lulling us into its forbidden garden. When most viewers can admit that 3 hours is too much time to spend with this kind of cretin, could we ever really root for them? In Scorsese’s hands, these fellows are far more irredeemable than any mobster.
 
 
Ironically, it may be another December release that was clearly influenced by Goodfellas that captured the one missing aspect from Wolf. In American Hustle, David O. Russell meshes his style with many of the flourishes that the fabled gangster picture enjoyed, including narrating protagonists whose ability to break the fourth wall endear us to them all the more. Likely due to completely fictionalizing the scandalous story of Abscam, lead characters Irving Rosenfeld (Christian Bale) and Sydney Prosser (Amy Adams) are a pair of affable crooks. Sure, they rip off dozens of desperate people for thousands of dollars at a time, but they do so with a smile-and-a-wink for each other, and even some easy-to-appreciate guilt when it comes to the honorable mayor of Camden, Carmine Polito (Jeremy Renner). The amount of sympathy imbued in these characters is so rich that their relatively conscious-free ending is a little too neat a bow for a movie that involved trying to scam the mob. Regardless, audiences still could respect these otherwise selfish criminals.
 
When it comes to the real wolves of Wall Street, even Marty “Goodfellas” Scorsese can’t get behind that. Apparently, no one can.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

It'll be interesting to see what awards Wolf of Wall Street will be up for. Though Leo's character is not likable whatsoever, Leo did a fine job acting so I'd like to see him get an acting nod (though I know he won't win).

Batman vs. Superman: Everything We Know

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/3/2014 at 8:36AM

Are Wonder Woman and Nightwing in the Batman vs. Superman movie? Here's everything we know about the 2015 film!

When Man of Steel arrived, fans were promised the start of a DC cinematic universe to rival Marvel's. At the 2013 San Diego Comic-Con, the announcement was made that Man of Steel 2 would be more than just a sequel, and instead plant the seeds of a Justice League movie. Henry Cavill will return as Superman and Ben Affleck will play Batman/Bruce Wayne. Affleck fits the mold of the "older and wiser" Batman who "bears the scars of a seasoned crimefighter" that Warner Bros. was looking for, which neatly sidesteps the need to re-establish Batman's origins on screen once again.
 
The latest, greatest, and biggest news involves the official announcement that Gal Gadot will be joining the film as Wonder Woman! There's no word yet on just how large her role in the film will be, but this will mark the first appearance of Wonder Woman on the big screen, and her first live-action appearance (not counting an unaired NBC television pilot from a few years back) since Lynda Carter hung up her bracelets in 1979.
 
While they aren't calling this a Justice League movie (at least, not yet) there's still a chance that other superheroes may make an appearance in the film. Unconfirmed rumors indicate that the word is out for Dick Grayson, in his secret identity as Nightwing, to make an appearance, with Adam Driver's name having surfaced as a contender for the role. However, Driver has denied any involvement with the project so far.
 
Zack Snyder is co-writing the story with David Goyer (who will then pen the screenplay), which is said to draw some inspiration from The Dark Knight Returns, the classic story by Frank Miller, Klaus Janson, and Lynn Varley which climaxed with an impressive street fight between Batman and Superman. While there are likely going to be some similarities, Goyer has stated that the film won't be an adaptation of that work. It seems possible that some of their conflict may stem from the controversial ending to Man of Steel, as Mr. Goyer promised, "we will be dealing with this in coming films...He isn't fully-formed as Superman in [Man of Steel], and he will have to deal with the repercussions of that in the next one." 
 
While no villains have yet been announced, the LexCorp easter eggs in Man of Steel would seem to indicate that there are immediate plans to introduce Lex Luthor in some capacity. David Goyer has stated that "Lex [Luthor] in this world is more a Bill Gates or Rupert Murdoch like character. He's probably a multi, multi billionaire. He's not a crook." While this quote comes from an interview that was conducted well before the Batman vs. Superman announcement, Goyer's vision for Lex would certainly put him in the same social circles as someone like Bruce Wayne. Luthor seems like such a likely contender as an on-screen presence in Batman vs. Superman that it has led to actors like Mark Strong commenting on the matter, as well as unsubstantiated "dream casting" rumors involving Breaking Bad's Bryan Cranston.  Recent statements by Zack Snyder also seemed to indicate that Lex will indeed show up in the movie, and Cranston's name continues to get mentioned in connection with Lex Luthor, however he's opening on Broadway in March, which doesn't leave much room for Batman vs. Superman, which begins filming in February. Jason Momoa's name has come up in connection with the film, but it's unclear who he would be playing, with speculation ranging from Doomsday to Hawkman. If he's another superpowered villain (or hero), it does broaden the scope a little further and seem to indicate that this may be a stealth Justice League movie after all.
 
The film is currently in aggressive pre-production, with primary filming scheduled to begin in early 2014 in Detroit, Michigan. However, some second-unit filming has already commenced, including at a football game between rival college teams from Metropolis and Gotham, as well as locations in Illinois which have doubled as the Kent farm. There have certainly been, at the very least, costume tests shot as Kevin Smith has seen a photo of Ben Affleck in a Batman costume, which he describes as something "you have not seen...in a movie before." Here's hoping that means it has some blue and grey...and maybe a yellow oval. 
 
Amy Adams, Laurence Fishburne, and Diane Lane will also reprise their Man of Steel roles. Batman vs. Superman is produced by Charles Roven and Deborah Snyder. It seems likely that Hans Zimmer will return as composer, given his history with both characters, although he did express that he "might not feel right" returning to score Batman again, so this one may be a "wait and see" situation. However, Zack Snyder recently said that they'd want Mr. Zimmer back "as long as he'll have us" but seemed to confirm that Zimmer wouldn't reuse any previous Batman themes, in order to distinguish this version of the character from Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight films, which Zimmer also scored.
 
 
Batman vs. Superman arrives on July 17, 2015.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

... Besides the Ben Affleck as Batman part ... It all sounds GREAT!

If they left Batman out and replaced Zack Snyder this would be a great movie!

Agreeing with the "it sounds great except for Ben Affleck" thing. He doesn't fit the mold of an "older and seasoned Batman" let alone just "Batman."

Seriously aren't you people forgetting one thing about Batman. He's a figure that can be constantly reinvented, this version is gonna be different deal with it.

Holy links, Batman!

Paranormal Activity: The Marked Ones

$
0
0
ReviewDon Kaye1/3/2014 at 8:48AM

The setting may be different but the scares are mostly the same in this somewhat effective yet awfully familiar franchise spinoff.

The more things change, the more they definitely stay the same in Paranormal Activity: The Marked Ones, an offshoot of the popular horror franchise that moves the action from the suburban homes of the first four films to a gritty Latino neighborhood in Oxnard, California, while still employing the “found footage” esthetic and mixed bag of scare tactics that are the trademarks of the rest of the series. The result is a film that is undeniably effective in places, yet begins to get bogged down by the same wearying issues that have plagued the series’ more recent entries.

Paranormal Activity: The Marked Ones begins with the high school graduation of Jesse (Andrew Jacobs) an affable young man who lives with his father, sister, and grandmother and spends his time hanging out with his clownish pal Hector (Jorge Diaz) and downstairs neighbor Marisol (Gabrielle Walsh). Jesse initially spends the first few days of the summer break playing with his new digital camera, through which we view all of the action, which consists largely of him and Hector trying to make fools of each other.

But things take a darker turn when the mysterious “crazy lady” who also lives in a downstairs apartment, Anna (Gloria Sandoval), is found murdered – and all signs point to the valedictorian of Jesse’s class, Oscar (Carlos Pratts). Jesse, Hector, and Marisol end up investigating the woman’s apartment, finding evidence that she practices black magic as well as objects that connect her – not that the teens know this – to the other Paranormal Activity movies. And when Jesse wakes up the following morning, he finds strange marks on his arm which indicate that something lurking in the old woman’s apartment is now coming after him.

Paranormal Activity: The Marked Ones was explicitly designed for a Latino audience – a strange notion, actually, since the previous films have had no problems attracting Latino viewers – and the early scenes of Jesse’s life with his family and friends go a long way toward establishing the likability and empathy of the main characters. But they’re never developed with any real depth – in fact, his father and sister all but vanish from the story by the halfway point – except for the background details necessary to link them to the larger Paranormal Activity mythology. Jesse and Hector’s other problem is that they have that annoying horror movie habit of doing pretty dumb things, like breaking into an active crime scene or entering a hidden basement.

Thankfully, the whole “setting up cameras around the house” format of the other films is largely absent, but oddly, the middle portion of the movie seems to borrow heavily from another “found footage” success story: 2012’s Chronicle. Without getting too deeply into spoiler territory, let’s just say that the entity haunting Jesse at first appears to not just protect him but give him unforeseen powers. We have to wonder if writer/director Christopher Landon (who wrote the three previous Paranormal Activity sequels) was given a mandate to incorporate a Chronicle-type plot element based on that film’s success.

By this movie’s third act, however, that story point has been dropped as well and Landon begins an escalating series of set pieces, pausing only for some helpful exposition that arrives via a character from one of the previous films. The underlying explanation for what is going on makes less sense the more you think about it, but as the shock tactics continue in the film’s final 30 minutes, The Marked Ones is revealed as a follow-up to one of the earlier sequels in particular while also managing to create what could be an alternate timeline for the entire series.

Yet as all this happens, that sense of familiarity sinks in, and most harmful of all, the “why is he still filming this?” distraction comes into play as well. While the film’s first half makes a decent argument for why Jesse and/or Hector constantly has the camera running, there’s simply no excuse for it in the closing scenes, including one laughable moment where one of them is trying to pry a board off a window with one hand while filming with the other.

Despite its flaws, however, The Marked Ones is still creepy and even frightening in a number of spots, usually when things are left unseen or appear in the background of a shot rather than leaping at the camera. A couple of scenes where Jesse and his friends use an old game of Simon to communicate with the entity are unnerving, and those well-worn prowls through dark, abandoned apartments and houses can still make the gooseflesh break out. The cast is appealing enough even if they end up going through the same paces as everyone else who has marched through the Paranormal Activity factory.

Make no mistake, that’s what this horror franchise has become: an assembly line, rolling out one variation after another (the official Paranormal Activity 5 will be next October, delayed by a year) with some of the entries more enjoyable, some less (we’re looking at you, PA 4), but all of them at this point delivering exactly what you would expect. In a pinch, I’d still rather spend time in this universe than that of Saw or Hatchet , but The Marked Ones’ surface differences to its cinematic cousins turn out to be hiding the same birthmarks as the rest of the family.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

 

 

 

6

The Raid 2: Barandal - first full trailer

$
0
0
TrailerRyan Lambie1/3/2014 at 9:00AM

Director Gareth Evans follows up his stunning 2011 martial arts flick The Raid with the sequel, Barandal. Here's the first full trailer...

We appreciate that we're late with this one due to our festive break, but we couldn't resist posting the latest trailer for The Raid 2: Berandal in case any of you happened to miss it.

This is director Gareth Evans' sequel, of course, to his startlingly brilliant 2011 movie The Raid, which introduced many of us to the Indonesian martial art, silat, and the seemingly superhuman abilities of its lead star, Iko Uwais.

In The Raid 2: Berandal, the first movie's claustrophobic violence spills out into the wider city of Jakarta, with Uwais' cop Rama going undercover to combat organised crime. As you'd expect, a considerable amount of fighting and assorted mayhem ensues, and once again, we're immediately struck by just how good Evans is at staging and shooting an action sequence.

So with a warning to the unwary of some potentially NSFW scenes of bloodshed, here's the latest, full trailer for The Raid 2. The movie's tentatively scheduled for a spring release in UK cinemas, so when we get a more precise date, we'll be sure to share it with you.

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Marvel to Publish Star Wars Comics Beginning in 2015

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/3/2014 at 1:23PM

Beginning in 2015, Marvel will become the publisher of Star Wars comics, taking over from Dark Horse.

We probably all expected this. From the moment Disney acquired the Star Wars license, it was only a matter of time before they brought Star Wars back into the fold of the comic book publisher they also own...in this case, none other than Marvel Comics. Dark Horse have been the faithful stewards of the Star Wars brand for over twenty years, producing an incredible amount of Star Wars related content spanning from the distant past to the far future of the Star Wars universe. That all comes to an end at the end of this year, as Marvel has now been granted exclusive rights to create and publish Star Wars comics and graphic novels beginning in 2015.

Marvel was the first home for Star Wars comics, beginning with their adaptation of the original film in 1977 (Star Wars #1 went on to sell over one million copies), their Star Wars ongoing series continued for nine years, and eventually expanded past Return of The Jedi, marking the first comic book adventures of Han, Luke, and Leia beyond the films. While Marvel's Star Wars comics were of varying quality, and the ones published in between film releases often found their continuity quickly invalidated, they're still fairly historic. However, it was Dark Horse's acquisition of the Star Wars license, which began with the memorable Dark Empire limited series (and its sequels) which many fans considered to be the first "official" expansion of the Star Wars mythology, which has now encompassed hundreds of other comics that have been embraced by fans for decades.

Marvel released several celebratory quotes:

“Dark Horse Comics published exceptional Star Wars comics for over 20 years, and we will always be grateful for their enormous contributions to the mythos, and the terrific partnership that we had,” said Carol Roeder, director of Lucasfilm franchise publishing, Disney Publishing Worldwide.  “In 2015, the cosmic adventures of Luke, Han, Leia and Chewbacca will make the lightspeed jump back to Marvel, to begin a new age of adventures within the Star Wars universe.”

“We here at Marvel could not be more excited to continue the publication of Star Wars comic books and graphic novels,” said Marvel Worldwide Publisher and President, Dan Buckley. “The perennial brand of Star Wars is one of the most iconic in entertainment history and we are honored to have the opportunity to bring our creative talent pool to continue, and expand Star Warsinto galaxies far, far away.”

“We’re incredibly excited by this next chapter in the Star Wars saga,” said Andrew B. Sugerman, executive vice president of Disney Publishing Worldwide. “Bringing together the iconic Lucasfilm and Marvel brands to tell new stories will allow us to continue to thrill lovers of the original Star Wars comic books and entertain generations to come.”

Dark Horse publisher Mike Richardson released a statement, as well:

All things come to pass. So too, do all licensed deals. I am sad to report that Disney, the new owner of Lucasfilm, has notified us here at Dark Horse of their intention to move the Star Wars publishing license to another of their recent acquisitions, Marvel Comics, beginning in 2015. This will end a partnership that has lasted more than two decades.

For those who are new to the industry, Dark Horse revolutionized the treatment of comics based on films. After a history of movie properties being poorly handled with little regard for execution and continuity, Dark Horse took a new approach, carefully choosing licenses and approaching them with excitement and creative energy. Our goal was to create sequels and prequels to the films we loved, paying careful attention to quality and detail, essentially treating those films as though they were our own. Star Wars has been the crown jewel of this approach. We began chasing the title as far back as 1989, and with the launch of Tom Veitch and Cam Kennedy’s Dark Empire, a new era in comics was born. I’m not ashamed to admit that we were Star Wars geeks, and we have been determined to spare neither effort nor expense in the pursuit of excellence.

It is ironic that this announcement comes at a time when Dark Horse is experiencing its most successful year ever. For obvious reasons, we have prepared for this eventuality by finding new and exciting projects to place on our schedule for 2015 and beyond. Will they take the place of Star Wars? That’s a tall order, but we will do our best to make that happen. In the meantime, 2014 may be our last year at the helm of the Star Wars comics franchise, but we plan to make it a memorable one. We know that fans of the franchise will expect no less. The Force is with us still.

At this writing, it's unclear whether the work published by Dark Horse will be available for reprint by Marvel. Dark Horse has reprinted the Marvel line of Star Wars comics as part of their (really great) Omnibus line, which contained other rare Star Wars comics that Marvel published during their tenure. Hopefully, Marvel will treat the Dark Horse material with the same respect. Regardless, this marks the end of an era in comics history, and few comics companies in history have ever handled a popular license as well as Dark Horse did with Star Wars. Marvel has their work cut out for them.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

9 New Captain America: The Winter Soldier Stills Released

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/3/2014 at 1:41PM

Check out new pictures of Chris Evans, Scarlett Johansson, Samuel L. Jackson and Robert Redford in Captain America: The Winter Soldier!

The Northeast is covered in inches and feet of wintry weather, and Marvel Studios has seemingly commemorated the occasion by releasing new quality stills from their forthcoming Captain America: The Winter Soldier. For Empirefollowers, these may not seem so new, but this is the first time their full glory has been unveiled on the Interwebs.
 
Captain America: The Winter Soldier picks up where The Avengers left off with Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) trying to adjust to everyday life in the 21st century. Of course for him, everyday life consists of risky espionage missions performed under the guidance of SHIELD Director Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) and alongside the mysterious Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson). However, as Cap’s legendary status takes him to the hallowed halls of Washington D.C., he discovers an insidious shadow enemy within our own Capitol that opens old, long lost wounds.
 









 
Also starring Robert Redford, Sebastian Stan, Anthony Mackie, and Cobie Smulders, Captain America: The Winter Soldieropens April 4, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

WGA Announces Screen Nominations

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/3/2014 at 2:22PM

The WGA has released its nominations for original and adapted scripts in 2013, including American Hustle and The Wolf of Wall Street.

Winter may be in full swing, but awards season has only just begun as the Writers Guild has announced its nominees for the films of 2013. Among the films honored with recognition for excellence in an Original Screenplay were American Hustle’s Eric Warren Singer and David O. Russell, Woody Allen for Blue Jasmine, Spike Jonze’s work on Her, and Bob Nelson for Nebraska, a script that he wrote over a decade ago when director Alexander Payne first bought the rights.
 
On the Adapted Screenplay side of things, Richard Linklater, Julie Delpy, and Ethan Hawke’s trifecta revisiting of the Jesse & Celine characters earned Before Midnight a nomination, while Billy Ray, Peter Berg, and Terrence Winter, for Captain Phillips, Lone Survivor, and The Wolf of Wall Street, respectively, also picked up nominations.
 
Of course with any nominating process, the more intriguing aspect is who doesn’t get the invite and ends up snubbed. In the Original Screenplay category, Alfonso Cuarón and Jonás Cuarón’s absence for Gravity is quite glaring, and the snubbing of John Ridley for the well regarded 12 Years a Slave screenplay could potentially be shocking. However, WGA rules are different from those of most other guilds, including SAG and PGA, not to mention award bodies like the Oscars’ AMPAS. At this point, it is not quite clear as to why a film like 12 Years was ignored in favor of Lone Survivor, but it is possible that very specific WGA qualifications of what stands as a guild-approved script were not met by other highly anticipated contenders. It remains quite possible that movies like 12 Years a Slave, Gravity, and even Philomenawill slip past some of these other contenders when the Academy cast their ballots.
 
The WGA awards ceremony will be held simultaneously in New York and Los Angeles on Saturday, February 1, 2014.
 
The full list of nominees below:
 
ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
American Hustle, Written by Eric Warren Singer and David O. Russell; Columbia Pictures
Blue Jasmine, Written by Woody Allen; Sony Pictures Classics
Dallas Buyers Club, Written by Craig Borten & Melisa Wallack; Focus Features
Her, Written by Spike Jonze; Warner Bros.
Nebraska, Written by Bob Nelson; Paramount Pictures
 
ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
August: Osage County, Screenplay by Tracy Letts; Based on his play; The Weinstein Company
Before Midnight, Written by Richard Linklater & Julie Delpy & Ethan Hawke; Based on characters created by Richard Linklater & Kim Krizan; Sony Classics
Captain Phillips, Screenplay by Billy Ray; Based on the book A Captain’s Duty: Somali Pirates, Navy SEALS, and Dangerous Days at Sea by Richard Phillips with Stephan Talty; Columbia Pictures
Lone Survivor, Written by Peter Berg; Based on the book by Marcus Lutrell with Patrick Robinson; Universal Pictures
The Wolf of Wall Street, Screenplay by Terence Winter; Based on the book by Jordan Belfort; Paramount Pictures
 
DOCUMENTARY SCREENPLAY
Dirty Wars, Written by Jeremy Scahill & David Riker; Sundance Selects
Herblock – The Black & The White, Written by Sara Lukinson & Michael Stevens; The Stevens Company
No Place on Earth, Written by Janet Tobias & Paul Laikin; Magnolia Pictures
Stories We Tell, Written by Sarah Polley; Roadside Attractions
We Steal Secrets: The Story of Wikileaks; Written by Alex Gibney; Focus Features
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Fast & Furious 7 Will ‘Retire’ Paul Walker’s Brian O’Conner

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/3/2014 at 3:43PM

Paul Walker's Fast and Furious character Brian O'Conner will appear in the next film with existing footage before retiring.

Following the tragic passing of actor Paul Walker last November, Universal Pictures has been struggling to find a path forward for Fast & Furious 7, which shut down production on December 4. Over the holidays, the studio quietly moved the film’s release date to April 10, 2015 with the reminder that “Vin Diesel and Paul Walker lead the returning cast.”
 
Today, Universal has finally clarified its path forward in hopes of satisfying fans who want to see Walker’s final performance. As revealed in The Hollywood Reporter, the plan is to use existing footage already shot with Walker for Fast & Furious 7, before retiring the character, as opposed to uncomfortably killing his onscreen alter-ego, Brian O’Conner.
 
Prior to his death, Walker participated with director James Wan and the rest of the cast and crew in completing about half of the scenes for Fast & Furious 7, which purportedly was originally to be heavily focused on Brian O’Conner’s character. Over the last month, Wan and writers Chris Morgan, and Jeffrey Kirschenbaum have poured over footage in an attempt to find a way to use some of his scenes.
 
The new plan is to now write and film additional scenes that will allow Brian O’Conner to retire from his life of high-speed crime, but that will also feature him to some degree in the existing story.
 
Walker’s Brian O’Conner, who has appeared in five of the last six Fast and the Furious films, will return one last time in April 2015.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

New Clip For Wes Anderson’s The Grand Budapest Hotel

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/3/2014 at 4:07PM

Know the drill about torture? Then zip it and watch this new hilarious clip from The Grand Budapest Hotel.

If only life could be like a Wes Anderson movie. Besides the relative tranquility of everyone’s pulse, even when discussing matters of murder and torture, the mere way every person stands or dresses is cause for a knowing chuckle and a sheepish grin. And few may be more sheepish than M. Gustave (Ralph Fiennes), The Grand Budapest Hotel'scaddish concierge who must be accompanied by his trusty lobby boy Zero Moustafa (Tony Revolori) when he flees the mere sight of the local police, as personified by the impeccably cordial Edward Norton in the clip below.
 
 
The Grand Budapest Hotel also features Jude Law, Bill Murray, Jason Schwartzman, Saoirse Ronan, Jeff Goldblum, Adrian Brody, Willem Dafoe, Owen Willson, Harvey Keitel, F. Murray Abraham, and Mathieu Amalric. It opens March 7, 2014.

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Watch 4-Minutes of Jack Ryan: Shadow Agent

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/3/2014 at 5:16PM

Watch the first clip that features Chris Pine's Jack Ryan escaping a dangerous assassin.

As we near the January release for Jack Ryan: Shadow Agent, Paramount Pictures is pulling no punches in its marketing. In the first clip released from this reimagining of Tom Clancy characters, we are greeted to over four minutes of director Kenneth Branagh’s new take on the super agent. Indeed, much of it appears to be an early scene where an assassin, played by Game of Thrones’ Nonso Anozie, comes calling for Jack Ryan’s head while in an elegant hotel suite.
 
 
Jack Ryan: Shadow Agent stars Chris Pine in the titular role as a CIA analyst previously portrayed by Alec Baldwin, Harrison Ford, and Ben Affleck. When a botched assassination attempt puts all eyes on Ryan, his boss (Kevin Costner) embroils Ryan and wife Cathy (Keira Knightley) into international espionage involving a Russian arms dealer played by Branagh.
 
Jack Ryan: Shadow Agent opens January 17, 2014 in the U.S.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Top 10 Films of 2013

$
0
0
ListDavid Crow1/6/2014 at 8:17AM

Awards season is upon us, so Den of Geek takes pause to count down the 10 best films of the year!

It’s been 2014 for less than a week…that means awards season is in full, heated swing! HFPA, SAG, PGA, WGA, DGA, and, soon enough, the AMPAS (Oscars) will have their say in voting for the best of last year. However, before we really knuckle down into the horse racing that comes every winter for movie geeks, we thought it was time to look back on the actual films, awards darlings or not, that comprised some of the best efforts in 2013. So without further adieu, here is our Top 10 Films of 2013.
 
***NOTE: We have narrowed the selection down to English language films. But if you have not seen The Hunt, Blue is the Warmest Color, or The Act of Killing, do so now.
 

Honorable Mention: Blue Jasmine
Written and Directed by Woody Allen
 
If filmmakers half his age could be as prolific as Woody Allen has been during his 70s—the era in which he’s produced Match Point, Vicky Cristina Barcelona, and Midnight in Paris, amongst others—cinema would be a much richer medium. Always observant, articulate, and eminently witty, particularly with his acute fixation on the oblivion of death, Allen has never ceased in his nearly 50 years of filmmaking at creating memorable, insightful characters (especially when they’re women). But the real power of his latest effort, Blue Jasmine, comes from the volcanic emotion perpetually cued to erupt behind Cate Blanchett’s eyes. Loosely based on a socialite of fallen grace in New York’s moneyed circles, Blanchett’s Jasmine should be a creature of infinite disdain for audiences. She’s the wife of a Wall Street shyster (Alec Baldwin) who placed a willful Jasmine in her gilded cage right out of college. But after the husband’s house of cards tumbles under mysterious circumstances, Jasmine faces a fate far worse than death: a real world she’s not faintly equipped to handle. Groomed and prepared for maximum fabulousness all her life, seeing Jasmine on the streets of working class San Francisco with her less pretentious sister (Sally Hawkins) is akin to witnessing a Porsche be redressed as a taxi cab. Literally all dolled up with no place to go, Jasmine must retreat further and further into the reaches of her crumbling mind, brought to agonizing realization by one of the finest performances of the year.
 

10. The Way Way Back
Written and Directed by Nat Faxon and Jim Rash
 
Coming of age is difficult for any young adolescent, particularly when he’s a child of divorce. However, Nat Faxon and Jim Rash (screenwriters of The Descendants) prove that this can still be an emotionally honest and cathartic subject for film. That's achieved in no small measure by a sterling supporting cast that includes Toni Collette, Allison Janney, Maya Rudolph, and Anna SophiaRobb. Yet, one of the two real standouts is Steve Carell as Trent, the nastiest of passive aggressive villains. He isn’t just an evil would-be stepdad; he is a genuine force of evil in protagonist Duncan’s (Liam James) life. He goes far and beyond needling the son-he-never-wanted, practically urging him toward teen suicide. Carell is allowed to showcase a new side and gives the movie real meaning when Duncan finds earnest inspiration and patriarchal warmth from a fantastic Sam Rockwell. As Owen, Rockwell is the ringleader of an entire water park worth of colorful characters, and also the single lifeline to desperately needed joy in what otherwise could have been a story of teenage nihilism. In the water park, Duncan treads the tracks of many a young man, but it feels earned and, most importantly, real. Plus, his rapport with Rockwell remains one of the most endearing onscreen pairings all year.
 

9. Inside Llewyn Davis
Written and Directed by Joel & Ethan Coen
 
Film has been used to celebrate the liberating power of music and the transcendence offered by audible glory. What makes Inside Llewyn Davis so unique is its reverence for when the music stops. In the Coen Brothers’ hands, nothing is more pure than artistic failure, and failure is all that Llewyn Davis (Oscar Isaac) will ever know. A perpetual couch surfer living in 1961 Greenwich Village, Llewyn’s life is as dreary as the slushy-snow hybrid blowing down Washington Square Park. Success is measured in how many gigs he gets to play, and responsibility is paying for the mother of his unborn child’s abortion…for the second time. He will never have that moment where he inspires a record producer to take a chance on him and is indeed part of an old guard on their way out long before Bob Dylan’s imminent arrival, singing “The Times They are a-Changin.’” Inside Llewyn Davisis a movie about a fleeting moment in the New York folk music scene, but it is universal for any who never achieved their dream. And there’s something enduringly beautiful about that.
 

8. Captain Phillips
Directed by Paul Greengrass; Written by Billy Ray
 
Paul Greengrass is no stranger to adapting real-life tragedy into pulse-pounding “entertainment,” and Captain Phillips may be his best to date. As a harrowing retelling of how Richard Phillips (Tom Hanks) was taken hostage by Somali pirates following the hijacking of the U.S.-flagged MV Maersk Alabama, it is a narrative that we all (hopefully) know. But in Greengrass’ masterful hands, it is one of such white-knuckle intensity that the armrests of many a theater seat were probably destroyed. This biopic is the most intense cinematic experience of the season and is raised up by Tom Hanks bringing his long-missed A-game. The final scene of Phillips going to the U.S. Navy’s infirmary is the stuff awards are made of.
 

7. Gravity
Directed by Alfonso Cuarón; Written by Alfonso Cuarón and Jonás Cuarón
 
There are movies, and there are experiences; Gravity is the latter. A technical marvel that’s execution is still nigh impossible to conceive, this is the result of when auteurs are given free reign on a large canvas. A premise that took nearly a decade to get produced, Gravity is a mind-bending trip into a space that is so real, it is still confounding to believe that even much of the costuming was computer generated. Cuarón, notorious for his elaborate steadicam shots, opens up the cold vacuum of space into a glorious splendor with stunning “dollies” (using our orbit as their only tracks) and camera tricks that finally made 3D a worthwhile investment. Even when things quickly go to Hell, and the Heavens threaten to burn astronauts George Clooney and Sandra Bullock, our eyes can only bask in the graceful majesty of the coming storm (or satellite debris). This technical ballet is the one that will be talked about at film schools for many, many years to come.
 

6. The Wolf of Wall Street
Directed by Martin Scorsese; Written by Terence Winter
 
“I will not die sober,” Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio) screams at the top of his lungs when his yacht sails head-on into a rogue wave during a mad dash across the Mediterranean to his offshore bank accounts. As you can guess, he doesn’t die, nor does he stay sober for much of the movie’s nearly three-hour running time. Positioning itself as the Goodfellas of white-collar crime, The Wolf of Wall Street is a lurid peak behind the curtain at the “job creators” of Wall Street and a debauched lifestyle that could have made Caligula blush. About 180 minutes of drugs, sex, and more drugs, this movie is not for everyone, but for those who cherish Scorsese’s maddeningly fluid camera movements and fourth-wall defying narratives, complete with countless editing jumps, this wild cocaine-fueled ride is as covetous as the final bottle of “Lemons.” It may not achieve all the high-minded ambitions of taking the wolves, bears, bulls, and other assorted monsters of Wall Street to task, but when audiences see an overdosing Jordan narrate his crawling “drive” back home from the WASP-y country club, they’ll know that they’re in the hands of a master filmmaker who has not been so uninhibited in over a decade. That’s money in the bank.
 

5. Frozen
Directed by Chris Buck & Jennifer Lee; Written by Jennifer Lee
 
During end of the year plaudits, family films often are left out the cold; good thing that would never bother Disney’s Frozen, anyway. Long in the shadow of Pixar, DreamWorks, and nearly all other animation houses, Walt Disney Animation Studios has quietly rebuilt its brand with a series of promising family entertainments like Tangledand Wreck-It Ralph. But with Frozen, they are again atop the snowy mountain, and it is a sincere pleasure to behold. Embracing the Broadway-styled fairy tale musicals of the 1990s that Disney has run away from for so long, Frozen is an unapologetic showstopper of a movie with luscious songs by Robert Lopez and Kristen Anderson-Lopez, harkening back to the glory days of Howard Ashman and Alan Menken’s partnership (The Little Mermaid, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin). While this project does not quite live up to those giants, it carves out its own inevitable legacy as the first Disney princess movie to promote the love of sisters and family over the first charming prince who steps off the boat. It is a surprisingly clever film with a message as timely for adults as young children, and it will be cherished by generations to come.
 

4. American Hustle
Directed by David O. Russell; Written by Eric Singer and David O. Russell
 
Two conmen, an overeager FBI agent, a working class hero mayor, and a seriously deranged housewife with a big mouth...American Hustle should be the set-up for a great joke. And maybe it is, despite the opening title card reminding viewers that “some of this actually happened.” Based loosely around the Abscam affair, David O. Russell uses the 1970s scandal where the feds busted New Jersey politicians and civic leaders for taking bribes to build an Atlantic City casino as the backdrop for either the funniest drama or most twisted comedy of 2013. Either way, we’re instantly hooked by a slew of mesmerizing performances from Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Bradley Cooper, Jennifer Lawrence, and Jeremy Renner. With a beer belly and a shaved head (done for the authentic comb over), Bale has never appeared to have more fun, at least until he comes face to face with the legitimate head of the mafia, embodied by a prodigious cameo. Meanwhile, Adams gets to show a sultrier side to her big screen persona, as she and Bale dance their way through a story so cynical that it must be greeted with a smile and a kidney punch. However, the real standout is again Jennifer Lawrence, who announces in back-to-back Russell films that she is the actress of her generation to beat. Her shrill presence is so bombastic in Hustle that laughter is the sole way to not quiver in fear every time she appears. This is a movie where everyone is hustling so quickly through the kaleidoscopic frames that they never once have enough time to look in the mirror and realize how ridiculous their clothes and disco ball-sized haircuts appear. A microcosm for the entire "Me Generation" birthed in the 1970s (and going strong today)? Mayhaps. It's highly unlikely this is a realistic depiction of conmen or the FBI, but who cares? Let Russell channel his inner-Scorsese in this tricky narrative that jumps around so much that you'll only know for sure it’s a fantastic ride you’ll take again and again.
 

3. Before Midnight
Directed by Richard Linklater; Written by Richard Linklater, Julie Delpy & Ethan Hawke
 
Jesse and Celine can talk. For three movies now, they have been able to dissect the meaning of the universe and their own personal love lives with such loquacious awareness that it’s a wonder they don’t realize it’s not so cute anymore. Maybe they do. Before Midnight is about more than just the time of the day their next life-altering conversation occurs; it is them coming to terms with their love story after boating off into the Parisian sunset and before the onset of life beyond middle age. Theirs is no longer the love story of hopeless romantics, but seasoned lovers who know exactly what to say to each other, making for some of their most hilarious and poignantly hurtful insights to date. Linklater, Delpy, and Hawke demonstrate an intimate understanding of their characters after nearly 20 years, and their cinematic experiment has drawn multitudes of moviegoers into the conversation. Before Midnightis not as sweet as its predecessors, but it is wiser and more fulfilling in its hard-won realizations. It is also the most satisfying love story of the year, leaving us to hope that Jesse and Celine will one day still have more to say.
 

2. Her
Written and Directed by Spike Jonze
 
Yet the most timely love story of the year is perhaps the most reflective. Whether a cautionary horror film about the future of our culture or a modern fairy tale for the 21st century, Her works on as many levels as its vocally curious operating system, Samantha. Voiced with spunky charisma by Scarlett Johansson, the faceless voice of Theodore’s computer is the most fascinating character of the year. Developed to be the first fully aware artificial intelligence operating system, Samantha insists repeatedly to Joaquin Phoenix’s sad sack protagonist (and the audience) that she’s fully her own independent entity. But until the third act, one is left to question how much of her personality is indeed hers and how much of it was designed by programmers who are so precise that she could be created for Theodore just based on the timber of his voice and the relationship with his mother. Recovering from his own divorce, Theodore is a hapless soul realized in a remarkable performance by Phoenix, who is likely holding a one-way conversation the whole production. Theodore has retreated into many of the satirical comforts of modern day life as lampooned by Jonze’s script and deceivingly bright, sunny cinematography. Doubling as both an Apple commercial and the style of any current indie rom-com, Herdepicts Theodore sincerely falling in love with his smartphone’s voice. Is that really so wrong to an audience that has long been smitten with Siri? Perhaps, the most telling aspect of the movie is just how cool Amy Adams, Chris Pratt, and any number of likable, “normal” actors are with this romance. The truth is that we already accept this form of romance; Samantha just vocalizes it. Program or person, lover or harbinger of societal doom, Samantha will be the subject of many a term paper to come. And the boundless ambiguity of this story makes it the most revelatory of 2013.
 

1. 12 Years a Slave
Directed by Steve McQueen; Written by John Ridley
 
Slave narratives have remained one of the defining fabrics of American culture since they were first published as abolitionist literature in the early and mid 19th century. One such story that fell into obscurity over the last century, Solomon Northup’s Twelve Years a Slave, now stands as the source for the most unflinching and meticulously painful cinematic portrait of an American experience since Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan. Captured in unnerving detail by English-born Steve McQueen, this film avoids much of the sentimentality and emotional couching of other slave films, instead choosing to capture this fraction of the institution’s power with all the autonomy and mercy of a slaughterhouse machine. An unending, clanking sound of metal underscores the terrors in store for Solomon (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a born freeman tricked and trapped into onscreen bondage of visceral feeling. Whether it is a Southern planter whose soul quietly cringes as his slaves are whipped or the hands of a sadist played with authentic evil by Michael Fassbender (the mind instantly wanders to Ralph Fiennes’ Amon Goeth), the end result is the same for Solomon: suffering, indignation, and survival. Solomon eventually achieves freedom from his chains, but his story remains nothing short of a national tragedy that haunts the consciousness of filmgoers long after the final credit has passed. This is not the highest entertainment of 2013, but it is the most engrossing, leaving a severe mark in the shape of Ejiofor's inescapable eyes.
 
There are our 10 best films of 2013. Agree? Disagree? Want to write a strongly worded rebuttal about any of the above selected films? Let us know in the comments section below!
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Disqus - noscript

I know it was a small movie but I still think one of my favorites of the year was "Mud."

I greatly enjoyed Mud myself, but it like a few other gems (such as Side Effects, Don Jon, etc.) just did not quite make the cut for me when compared to other films from the year. Thanks for the comment!

The Hunger Games: The Mockingjay Problem

$
0
0
FeatureSarah Dobbs1/6/2014 at 8:49AM

The third Hunger Games book might be the hardest to adapt to the screen. Sarah looks at the reasons why...

This article contains spoilers for The Hunger Games: Catching Fire and Mockingjay.

By now, you should’ve had time to see Catching Fire at least twice, had a good cry over it, and compiled a mental list of everything that was different in the film to the book. So let’s start thinking about Mockingjay. Because of the three Hunger Gamesnovels, it seems like that’s the one that’s going to be hardest to adapt to the screen.

For starters, it’s the most controversial book in the trilogy. Although it was fairly well received critically, not all of the fans enjoyed the book’s darker tone. Like the previous two books, Mockingjay is told from Katniss’s POV, but by this stage she’s thoroughly bruised and battered, and spends much of her time finding dark corners to curl up in and hide from the world. She’s suffering from PTSD, and it’s heart-breaking, but it also means not much happens for long stretches of time.

When something does happen, it’s violent and brutal and generally involves the death of at least one beloved character. Then there’s that epilogue, in which Katniss and Peeta fall in love for real, have a family, and live…well, not happily ever after, since this is The Hunger Games and both of them are pretty scarred by their experiences, but as happily as could reasonably be expected. Portraying those things on screen, when many fans already hate the fact that they happened, isn’t gonna be universally popular.

But there are other issues, too, especially considering the decisions that have been made in the first two Hunger Games movies. The love triangle, for instance, despite being much trumpeted by the marketing and media coverage of the films, isn’t really that prominent in the films. And despite Jennifer Lawrence’s all-round wonderfulness, some of the subtleties of those relationships has been lost in the movies.

It’s not clear from the films how Katniss really feels about Peeta, for instance; it’s possible to read it all as an act, when in the books she’s confused, unable to sort through her emotions, but definitely feels something for him. And Gale has been pushed so far into the background in the films that the Mockingjay movies are gonna have to work pretty hard to establish, well, everything about him. We got a tiny glimpse of his hot-headedness, his will to fight, and his hatred for the Capitol in Catching Fire, but is that enough to prepare movie audiences for what he’s do in the next movie? I suspect it might feel a bit like it came out of nowhere.

Speaking of coming out of nowhere, District 13 hasn’t really been set up very well in the movies, has it? In Catching Fire the book, Katniss meets two refugees from District 8, Bonnie and Twill, who tell her that they suspect District 13 isn’t the nuclear wasteland the Capitol claims it is, which sets up the exodus from District 12. But the movie didn’t include that scene, and there hasn’t been all that much focus on the district that started the last uprising, so the introduction of District 13 in Mockingjay Part 1 might seem a little out of the blue.

On a more practical level, the CGI creatures in the Hunger Games movies haven’t been brilliant so far (though Catching Fire did a better job of its killer monkeys than The Hunger Games did of the wolf mutts) and the mutations in Mockingjayseem particularly ill-suited to the screen. Human-sized white-skinned lizards that smell of roses? Yikes. There’s a very real danger that they’d just look ridiculous, rather than terrifying, and their perfume probably ought to be dropped completely – it works in the book, when we’re inside Katniss’s head and privy to all her thoughts and sensations, but on film, it seems like a trickier sell.

Then there’s the commercial side of things. Mockingjayhas been split into two films, like so many of the final instalments in young adult film franchises. Arguably, Mockingjaydeserves it, since there’s so much going on, and there’s even a fairly obvious place to split the story – Mockingjay Part 1 will almost certainly end with the scene where Katniss and Peeta are finally reunited and he tries to strangle her. It’s a killer cliff-hanger, and it changes the whole dynamic of the story.

There’s a lot of story to fit in, and the filmmakers have already said they’re going to be adding in new characters and new plot elements… which is interesting, considering there are so many new characters introduced in Mockingjayanyway. Whether fans will welcome the chance to see a bit more of the world of Panem that Katniss’s POV hid in the novels, or whether they’ll be outraged at any changes to their beloved texts, remains to be seen. (I’m a bit wary, myself.)

And then there’s the demographic issue. Both The Hunger Games and Catching Fire have been rated 12A in the UK (PG-13 in the US), meaning that, considering the subject matter, the filmmakers had to find clever ways to get round the violence of the story. That might actually have made it feel even more shocking, in some cases – hearing Gale’s screams as Katniss runs towards him was harrowing enough, even without seeing the whip connect with his flesh – but Mockingjayhas a massive body count. How do you do the scene where children and medics, including Katniss’s sister, are killed by rebel bombs, for instance? It seems likely that it’ll be done using Katniss’s POV, keeping her view obscured and cutting away to avoid any blood spatter, but even so, that’s a pretty nasty scene for a kids’ film.

It’s not like there are just a few gory scenes in Mockingjaythat can be worked around; the whole thing is incredibly bleak, permeated with death and despair. (I mean, it opens with Katniss walking through the ashes of her former home and nearly tripping over a skull, it’s not a fun book.) It’s in Mockingjaythat we find out what happens to Victors after the Games, too – they are, essentially, forced into prostitution, hired out to anyone in the Capitol who can pay for their services, and if they refuse, their loved ones are murdered. That’s a pretty big deal, and a pretty significant piece of both Finnick and Johanna’s backstory. But it’s not gonna fly in a 12A, is it? It’ll be interesting to see how screenwriter Danny Strong (Buffy’s Jonathan) decides to get round that.

The biggest issue, though, might be the titular Mockingjay. In the books, it’s explained fairly early on that the mockingjay is a symbol of the Capitol’s failure; during the last uprising, the government of Panem had created a genetically modified bird called a jabberjay which could repeat anything it heard. The idea was that the jabberjays (which made a brief appearance in Catching Fire) would eavesdrop on the rebels’ plans and report back to the Capitol, but the rebels soon caught on and started feeding nonsense back to the Capitol.

More embarrassingly, the jabberjays mated with wild mockingbirds, creating a species that can’t repeat words, but can copy songs – the mockingjays that Katniss and Rue used to send signals to one another in the first arena. The mockingjay became a sort of symbol of the Capitol’s failure, which is why it’s important that Katniss wears her mockingjay badge as a symbol of rebellion, and also explains why she, as a figurehead of the revolution, becomes known as the Mockingjay. And it’s also why Cinna got murdered for making Katniss a mockingjay dress.

So much of the Hunger Games story is about symbols and what they represent, with the mockingjay being the most potent symbol of all, but in the movies, that hasn’t really come across. Katniss’s pin has been around since the first movie, and we’ve seen it replicated in graffiti, and in Katniss’s amazing dress, but it hasn’t really been explained, or given much significance. Plutarch’s tell-tale watch, for instance, didn’t make an appearance. To anyone who’d just seen the movies and not read the books, the mockingjay probably doesn’t mean much of anything right now – beyond maybe reminding them of Rue? – and that is gonna be difficult to smooth away in the Mockingjaymovies, as District 13 presses Katniss into assuming the mantle of the Mockingjay in their propaganda videos.

Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of things that will undoubtedly be great in the movie. The first two films have been great adaptations, and with Catching Firedirector Francis Lawrence returning for both the final films, there’s no real reason to suspect the ball will be dropped now. And the movies have already set up a couple of things that weren’t in the books, but which will pay off brilliantly in Mockingjay Parts 1 and 2– we’ve already seen President Snow’s rose garden, for instance, and already been introduced to his granddaughter, which should make that all-important vote at the end of Mockingjay seem particularly dramatic. And the shooting of President Coin is such a wonderfully cinematic sequence that I can’t wait to see it on screen.

I’ll be there on opening night for both movies, no matter what, because I love this story and have faith in these movies to do it justice. All the same, though, I don’t think I’d fancy Danny Strong’s job.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Disqus - noscript

SPOILERS!!
There is only one natural location for the split and it's at the reunion scene. Lets be honest though, a movie of the first half of that book would be kind of boring compared to HG and CF. There would need to be a lot of backstory to make it remotely interesting and engaging. The second half is action packed. I'm sorry but Prim dying is going to be what loses half the audience of new fans (book fans will know its coming). I have a hard time believing they'll show the children dying and linking Gale to them. I hope they do the book and story justice and show Katniss as she really was, beaten, battered and lost with only a shred of light left.

I think the Star Squad preparing to leave for the Capitol is the best way to end Part 1. It divides the action scenes neatly and gives space in Part 2 to flesh out the aftermath of Prim's death. eg. the trial. A whole movie without the Peeta-Katniss dynamic (even negative) doesn't work well for me. Part 2 would still have the 'will Peeta and Katniss get back together?' cliff hanger and it will also have included the Gale and Katniss kiss (which happens after Peeta returns) to add to the suspense.

re. the movie version of CF and not being able to see Katniss's growing love for Peeta. I think it's adequately conveyed by Snow's granddaughter who comments on it.

there is no "15" in America.. Thats why its PG-13.. Its parents Discression if they let their kiddos go or not.

Bravo! Took the words right out of my mouth.

I have to be honest with you. I have read the trilogy and I think that the books are mediocre at best. The second movie was better than the book in my opinion. I'll watch the next two movies just because I feel I have to finish the series, but I honestly don't see why people love the books so much.

I think they will be able to get everything in the book in these two movies... I mean come one, there isn't a ton that goes on in the first half of the book, so they will probably add things that we didn't get to see in the book because it's Katniss' point of view... Idk I think it will be good! I have total faith in Francis Lawrence <3

In terms of affecting the commercial success I don't think it matters. Every studio passed on this franchise because they didn't think people would see a movie about kids killing each other. They wont be dissuaded by dark subject matter.

The 10 underrated film performances of 2013

$
0
0
ListMark Harrison1/6/2014 at 8:49AM

As ever, some spectacular performances were overlooked in last year's rush of movie releases. Here's Mark's pick of the most underrated...

Here on Den Of Geek, It's become something of a tradition that when the end of the year rolls around, and the big awards bodies almost determinedly overlook genre movie theater, and that we compile a list of the underrated and underappreciated performances by actors in the last cinematic year.

We've tried to pick out turns that either went unnoticed in most reviews, or simply should have gotten more praise. It's less about the great performances that the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences are sure to overlook, than it is about giving praise where it's due.

It's unusual that this is either the most wide-open race in a while, or there aren't nearly enough people talking about who will definitely win Oscars this time around (Cate Blanchett in Blue Jasmine notwithstanding).

Nevertheless, we can safely predict that these are the best movie performances of 2013 that nobody is talking about for awards recognition.

Amy Acker: Much Ado About Nothing

Joss Whedon's black-and-white adaptation of Shakespeare's original romantic comedy was a product of the writer-director's geekdom for the Bard, and of play readings he's been hosting at his house since around the time he was working on Buffy The Vampire Slayer. None of the players in the movie had really acted in Shakespeare productions before, but it doesn't show.

While Nathan Fillion's hilarious comedy turn as the incompetent Dogberry received great notices, Amy Acker's Beatrice is the standout in the center of the movie. The witty dialogue trips off her tongue like it was written for her, and she has a canny knack for emotional deliveries too.

Rekindling the Wesley-Fred chemistry from Angel, she plays off Alexis Denisof's Benedick marvellously, and generally lights up the screen whenever she appears. Also, she gets what is, for our money, the finest cinematic pratfall of the year, trying to navigate some stairs while eavesdropping on her mischievous cousin and her friends.

Nicolas Cage: The Croods

If I were to list some Nicolas Cage movies from the last couple of years, it would be interesting to see how many you had forgotten: The Frozen Ground, Stolen, Ghost Rider: Spirit Of Vengeance, Trespass, Justice... the list of throwaway performances goes on and on. Surprisingly, it was DreamWorks Animation who really captured the best Cage performance of the year.

The Croods was a pleasant surprise in general - a family movie with a terrific message about how shunning intellect and innovation will only lead to extinction and entropy - but it's Cage's turn as conservative caveman Grug that really stands out. While DreamWorks has been guilty of stunt casting in the past, it's been ages since I've seen an animated movie so convincingly represent the same presence that we recognise from an actor's live-action work.

More than that, it's not purely the Ridic-olas Cage that launched a thousand memes and YouTube montages. There are some stirring emotional beats, and Cage nails them just as well as the wackier, more comedic moments. As much as we applaud the technical prowess that is integral to realising a performance like this, he feels more present here than he has been in any number of recent live-action films.

Jude Law: Side Effects

Billed as Steven Soderbergh's final directorial effort for the big screen, (barring the pleasant surprise of HBO's Behind The Candelabra getting a UK movie theater release back in August) Side Effects was an early gem in 2013's cinematic calendar- a near-masterpiece of its genre, which never let you get comfortable with the story's gymnastic twists and turns.

The trailers made Jude Law's role look like a supporting turn in a psychological horror about medication, which was a part of the movie's misdirection in itself. But Law takes a much more integral role, playing against the type of smarmy, suave character that had been attached to him until recently, and he does a terrific job too.

Soderbergh has a knack for bringing the best out of his actors, (see also: the recent Channing Tatum renaissance) and Law keeps pace with the myriad twists and turns quite impressively, alternating places in the audience's sympathies in a way that lends to the overall sense that this one demands a second viewing.

Eddie Marsan: Filth

James McAvoy arguably gave the year's best movie performance, as the bipolar, corrupt DS Bruce Robinson in Jon S Baird's Filth, and was duly rewarded with a gong for Best Actor at this month's British Independent movie Awards. McAvoy is incredible in the movie, and we're glad that's been recognised, but it means we can instead draw attention to another terrific performance.

After a brilliant against-type role in The World's End (more on which later), this is slightly more familiar terrain for Eddie Marsan, who plays Bruce's Masonic best bud and emotional punchbag, Bladesey.

He's such a helpless man, as Bruce kicks him around emotionally and physically, but the actor carries it off in a terrifically likeable fashion. One of the movie's funniest moments finds Bladesey off his head on drugs, rubbing his nipples as he dances around a gay bar in Amsterdam, but Marsan also excels in the quieter moments of pathos.

Colm Meaney: Alan Partridge: Alpha Papa

It's interesting when a movie manages to make you feel sympathy for its villain, but it's not usually a good thing when you consider him to be better than the movie's hero. Alan Partridge's first feature movie, Alpha Papa, revolves around a corporate takeover of the North Norfolk Digital radio station, prompting fears of a clearout of the old guard.

Alan cheerfully throws his colleague under the bus with a scribbled “Just Sack Pat”, not banking on Pat coming back that night with a shotgun and holding the station hostage. As the movie swings back to satirising corporate takeovers, Colm Meaney really makes the most of Pat's somewhat tragic backstory.

In an interview with Den Of Geek last month, Meaney told us: “I tend to play more active, sometimes aggressive types. This guy seemed curiously gentle and introverted in a way, even though he was a DJ.”

It's a testament to his moving performance that the gentleness comes across just as strongly as his temper, making for the year's most sympathetic screen antagonist.

Bill Nighy: About Time

Since Richard Curtis cast Bill Nighy as aging rock star Billy Mack in 2003's Love Actually, he's found ways to bring him back in everything he's done since, from The Boat That Rocked to his Doctor Who episode, Vincent And The Doctor, and now as a wise, time-travelling dad in About Time. It's understandable - if you can have Bill Nighy in your movie, you should have Bill Nighy in your movie.

And if About Time were better, Nighy would almost certainly be in the running for Best Supporting Actor nods up and down awards season. As much as the posters billed it as a romantic comedy, young Tim's quest to get a girlfriend with timey-wimey shenanigans is really more of a sub-plot, and the movie really comes to life whenever Domhnall Gleeson's Tim sits down with Nighy for a natter.

Towards the end, while Curtis faffs about in what seems like yet another movie with a whole TV series' worth of subplot crammed into it, Nighy brought us to the brink of tears in the movie's moving finale. As geeks, we all know that the ending utterly ignores the already shaky rules of time-travel that the movie has established. As sons and daughters, we don't care - Nighy is a perfect screen dad.

BJ Novak and Jason Schwartzman: Saving Mr Banks

Technically cheating? Well, there were a lot of good performances this year and these two are inseparable from one another in their superb performance as the Sherman brothers. While Emma Thompson seems set to get some attention for getting spectacularly cross with them and every other American who's trying to adapt Mary Poppins, these are the unsung heroes of the movie.

As you'd expect from both Novak and Schwartzman, they have impeccable comic timing as Robert and Richard Sherman, respectively. If you've seen 2009's The Boys: The Sherman Brothers Story, you might have an idea of what you're in for, but for the uninitiated, certain passages of Saving Mr Banks are like watching the Sherman brothers biopic you never knew you wanted.

You can also hear their renditions of songs from the Mary Poppins songbook on the soundtrack for Saving Mr Banks, and it's only a shame that Mrs Travers interrupts most of them - if Disney released an album of them with Bradley Whitford's Don DaGradi singing the whole soundtrack, we'd buy it. More than that, it would be very nice to see that biopic...

Simon Pegg: The World's End

Much has been written about Gary King in The World's End, not all of it nice. After Shaun Ryder and Nick Angel, Simon Pegg gave up the straight man role to play more of a lovable screw-up, with far less emphasis on the “lovable” than many viewers could stomach. Gary is a manipulative, alcoholic arsehole, who ultimately leads his friends down the path to armageddon.

Whether you like the character or not, it's a brave performance for Pegg, and it's probably a career-best for him in terms of acting. The pathos in Gary's character comes out so late in the story, that if it weren't for the strength of Pegg's performance, he'd be pretty much unwatchable.

Without going into spoilers, we can't really argue that the ending of the movie is a tad shambolic, and it's understandable if you come away feeling that Gary didn't really learn anything, but for once, we have the chance to single out Simon Pegg the actor over Simon Pegg the screenwriter.

While we're on the subject, special mention should go to Nick Frost, who also puts in a revelatory turn as Gary's former friend and long-suffering enabler, Andy - this one was a terrific showcase for his range as a straight man and an action man, and if you did feel Gary was unwatchable, it's Frost's Andy that always keeps you on side.

 

[related article: Our Top 10 Films of 2013]

Saoirse Ronan: Byzantium

Neil Jordan's seaside vampire noir was one of the underrated films of the year, finding a different spin on the nocturnal beasties in a market that has been saturated with mail-modernity and Twilight movies in recent years - we've never really seen a mother-daughter vampire dynamic before.

While Gemma Arterton puts in solid work, Saoirse Ronan does that Saoirse Ronan thing of being absolutely brilliant in everything. Given the more integral and understated role, she brings a real sadness to the role of Eleanor. There's a sense that Arterton's Clara has numbed herself to the angst of eternal life in the time she has on her daughter. Ronan makes that raw and fragile, but there's a steely resolve beneath that.

After I originally saw the movie, I immediately felt that it might have been even more interesting if a younger actress were cast as the mother and an older actress as the daughter, playing with vampire aging in a different fashion, but on the strength of Ronan's performance, I wouldn't have had it any other way.

Maribel Verdú: Blancanieves

Pablo Berger's silent movie re-telling of Snow White has a callous and frightening villain in the form of Maribel Verdú's Encarna, the most sinister incarnation of the wicked stepmother character since Disney's. Her rivalry with her step-daughter, Carmen, is intense, and even though you know the story, there's an air of not really knowing what depths she will stoop to next.

Berger updates the story to the 1920s and imagines Encarna as a ruthless social climber- she starts out as a nurse to Carmen's beloved father, before marrying him and later inheriting his wealth and belongings.

Verdú plays the role magnificently. It's all the more impressive for being a silent movie performance- there aren't many people who can pull off this style of acting without lapsing into gurning, but Verdú is a perfectly hateful villain.

Honourable mention: Anybody in Cloud Atlas

Okay, so this is definitely cheating. It came out in US cinemas back in October 2012, but by the magic of UK release dates, it's actually been almost a year since people were embroiled in not praising the ambition and vision of Cloud Atlas, one of the better adaptations of an “unadaptable” text in recent years.

Turning the six-pronged novel into a 172 minute movie is a daunting task, but by using the same actors to visually link recurring themes, directors Tom Tykwer and Andy and Lana Wachowski both simplified and contextualised the unwieldy source material for the big screen.

And so, the cast are literally all over the store, with race and gender proving no bar to which roles they can be cast in. Even if the make-up lets them down in some scenes, the bravery and believability of some of these turns is spectacular throughout.

We considered singling out one actor, but it's tough to pick just one, mostly because everyone in the cast makes a good fist of it, but also because when you start comparing, it comes down to which actors were consistently the best in different segments of the movie, which isn't entirely the point.

To pick a few highlights, Jim Broadbent is superb in the knockabout Ealing comedy strand in which his character unwittingly commits himself to a nursing home, Ben Whishaw gives an excellent portrayal of a tormented, bisexual composer, and Hugh Grant furiously rages against type in a variety of villainous and downright scary roles.

In a year that has also included Captain Phillips and Saving Mr Banks, Tom Hanks adds a few more great turns to his CV (even if we're not sure about his Irish gangster-cum-author) all at once, as the de facto lead.

One villainous monologue from the movie turned out to be oddly prophetic of the movie's reception. There's a natural order, and those who try to upend it do not fare well. It's unfortunate that the movie hasn't been appreciated in its time, but in a way it's fitting that the most underrated movie of the year is packed to the gills with underrated performances.

Have we missed any performers that you feel deserved more attention from critics and awards organisations? Leave your suggestions in the comments - we'll have our own damn awards show!

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing.

Disqus - noscript

Still waiting for someone to edit "Cloud Atlas" like the book

Absolutely loved Saoirse Ronan in Byzantium.. Everybody performed at their best in Cloud Atlas but Ben Whishaw, Doona Bae and Hugo Weaving impressed me the most.


Samuel L Jackson heads up the first trailer for Kite

$
0
0
TrailerRyan Lambie1/6/2014 at 8:54AM

Live action anime adaptation Kite gets its first trailer, with an introduction from a casually-dressed Samuel L Jackson...

A live-action adaptation of Yasuomi Umetsu's ultraviolent anime about a deadly young female assassin has been in various stages of development for years, but we can now be sure that Kite is finally nearing completion.

Stuntman turned director David R Ellis was making the movie in Johannesberg when he sadly died in January last year. Director Ralph Ziman then stepped in to complete it. The result is a hyper-stylised, violent yet inevitably less explicit take on the Japanese original, with India Eisley playing the worryingly youthful-looking killer Sawa, and Samuel L Jackson providing support as a corrupt cop.

The (very NSFW) first trailer and clip, introduced by Samuel L Jackson, gives an idea of the movie's look and feel: a kind of grungy collision of Leon, Sucker Punch and Hanna with a dash of Drive thrown in for good measure.

There's no firm release date for Kite yet, but we'll let you know when one appears.

Bloody Disgusting

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

The writer of Transformers: The Movie on killing Optimus Prime

$
0
0
NewsRyan Lambie1/6/2014 at 9:03AM

In a candid interview, writer Ron Friedman talks about the infamous death of Optimus Prime in the 1986 Transformers: The Movie...

Way, way before Michael Bay brought us his live-action Transformers adaptations, Hasbro's hit line of toys' previous big screen outing came in 1986 - the animated feature Transformers: The Movie.

Featuring some lavish animation from Toei and a starry voice cast including Eric Idle, Leonard Nimoy and Orson Welles, the movie was notable for the violent deaths of several characters, most infamously the Autobot leader, Optimus Prime. With Hasbro keen to tie off the old line of toys, and use the movie to introduce a new range of robots, poor old Prime's fate was sealed - despite the warnings of screenwriter Ron Friedman.

Already an experienced writer for TV and movie, Friedman had been involved in the Transformers series since it began in 1984, and also worked on such hit shows as G.I. Joe and Marvel Action Hour. In a new interview with writer Todd Matthy, Friedman talks candidly about his career and work on Transformers: The Movie, and in particular his misgivings about Prime's death.

"They [Hasbro] didn’t recognize that Optimus Prime was the heartbeat of the Autobots," Friedman said. "The strong and fatherly presence that made sure everybody else behaves and tries to live up to his example. You cannot pass that over and have any hope of duplicating the success you had. I proved right because they resurrected him rapidly. They established an icon."

When it was made clear that Prime had to go, Friedman came up with a brilliant concept: that of the Matrix, an artefact of power which can be passed down from Autobot to Autobot - and the inspiration for that artefact, Friedman reveals, came from a source we hadn't expected.

"I tried to establish an essential ingredient for the Optimus Prime character that he was both the caretaker and exponent of. That was the Matrix. It’s like the Petrean Touch in Catholicism. St. Peter touched his successor and every successive Pope has touched the next Pope carrying the touch of Peter into eternity [...] In effect, Prime did not die, he assumed another form resident in his successor, Rodimus Prime."

Elsewhere in the interview, Friedman talks about creating the planet-eating colossus Unicron, Greek mythology, his friendship with Stan Lee and his work in the Marvel universe, and his struggle to convince Hasbro to create a female Transformer.

It's a lively, fascinating interview, and well worth reading in full - you can do so here.

Ron Friedman's memoir, I Killed Optimus Prime, is due out later this year. On the strength of Friedman's anecdotes above, it should make for an engrossing read.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!


Katee Sackhoff Wants to Be Harley Quinn…Or in Star Wars

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/6/2014 at 12:41PM

The Battlestar: Galactica actress speaks candidly about wanting to join DC or Star Wars franchises that both reboot in 2015.

So many franchises are getting ready to set sail in one rebooted form or another in 2015 that it must appear like the big budget promise land for many a talent. And Katee Sackhoff (Battlestar: Galactica, Riddick) is unafraid to throw her hat in the ring for these kind of opportunities. And why not? It worked for Samuel L. Jackson when it came to Star Wars!
 
While speaking with Total Film, Sackhoff openly talked about auditioning for David E. Kelly’s failed Wonder Woman TV Series and candidly spoke of wanting to enter the DC Universe as lady Diana. However, the DC character that she really has eyes for is Harley Quinn.
 
"I think I might give away my firstborn to have an opportunity to play Harley Quinn."
 
Sackhoff also was very warm about other franchises beyond Batman that are seeing a 2015 reboot. After all, she has already voiced Bo-Katan on Star Wars: The Clone Wars TV series that ran from 2012 to 2013.
 
Star Wars meant everything to me growing up,” Sackhoff told Total Film while reflecting on that series. “Star Wars was, I mean, it was the first time I remember seeing three movies that all kind of went together. It was just an amazing final understanding of what a trilogy was.
 
I was absolutely obsessed, I mean I wanted to be... The sad thing is, I never wanted to be Princess Leia, I always wanted to be Han Solo…If [director J.J. Abrams] would listen, I would play a rock in the Star Wars movies. I think that they're fantastic, I think that he's a great choice, and I'm excited to see what happens in that world.”
 
Sackhoff can next be seen in Tell with Alan Tudyk, Milo Ventimiglia, and Jason Lee.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

Spielberg Eying Cortez Epic with Javier Bardem

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/6/2014 at 3:12PM

Steven Spielberg prepares to direct film about Hernando Cortez based on 50-year old script by legendary Dalton Trumbo.

A question that has plagued many filmgoers since Steven Spielberg’s sterling Lincoln has been...what’s next? In back-to-back succession, the blockbuster auteur has dropped out of one promising project and then another with Robopocalypseand American Sniper, respectively. The first, a still on-the-table sci-fi epic about the rise of machines scripted by Drew Goddard (Cabin in the Woods) and originally slated to star Chris Hemsworth and Anne Hathaway, was passed over for a film about Navy SEAL Chris Kyle with Bradley Cooper set to star. Spielberg then removed himself and his studio brand of DreamWorks from the project, leaving some to wonder how long would he stay unemployed?
 
Apparently not for too much more time according to Deadline, which reports the delicious prospect of Spielberg preparing to direct a nearly 50-year old fabled Hollywood script…Montezuma. The story of Spanish Conquistador Hernando Cortez, the film would be a Hollywood retelling of what happened when Spain came to Mexico and broke the Aztec Empire. More tantalizing still is that Javier Bardem is very interested to tackle the role of the legendary Spaniard, which may explain his reluctance to play Blackbeard in Warner Brothers’ Peter Pan reboot.
 
The screenplay Montezuma was written by Dalton Trumbo, one of the “Hollywood Ten” who was blacklisted for not giving up names to the House Un-American Activities Committee. Indeed, Trumbo spent 11 months in jail for his defiance at HUAC and the U.S. Congress. Blacklisted for over a decade, Trumbo was forced to move to Mexico where he wrote scripts under pseudonyms, including the noir classic Gun Crazy (1950), romantic icon Roman Holiday (1953), and an Oscar-winning screenplay for The Brave One (1956), which he was credited in as “Robert Rich.” Eventually he earned the support of Kirk Douglas who handpicked him to write the screenplay for his next star vehicle, the Stanley Kubrick directed Spartacus(1960). In 1965, Trumbo wrote a 205-page draft of Montezumafor Kirk Douglas to star as Cortez, but the project fell apart.
 
Deadline reports that the title will likely be changed to Cortez, as the conqueror will be the subject of the film, especially when played by the always-fascinating Bardem. Steve Zaillian is onboard as well to rewrite the script for modern sensibilities and seems like a strong choice given his penchant for scripting historical epics in the past like Gangs of New York and Spielberg’s own Schindler’s List. He most recently won an Oscar for co-writing Moneyball and has scribed the text for Ridley Scott’s Moses picture, Exodus, which stars Christian Bale later this year.
 
Cortez will chronicle when the Spanish gold-hunter entered the Mexico region in 1519, becoming a guest (and prisoner) of Aztec ruler Montezuma, before eventually turning on his host leading to an apocalyptic war.
 
More as it develops.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!

New Batman and Superman Posters from The Lego Movie

$
0
0
NewsDen Of Geek1/6/2014 at 5:01PM

Check out posters for the Dark Knight and Man of Steel from the new Lego movie!

The Dark Knight and the Man of Steel…Two of the most iconic superheroes of all time are finally about to share space in the same theatrically released film for the first time…and it ain’t Ben Affleck or Henry Cavill.
 
Yes, Lego, not satisfied with taking over the video game market, is coming to the big screen, and they have released new released posters for their version of Batman and Superman to let you know!
 
Voiced by Will Arnett and Channing Tatum, respectively, this is not your typical superhero story.



 
From directors Phil Lord and Chris Millar of Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs and 21 Jump Street, the Lego world is in peril and all the voices of superheroes, wizards, and every other faction must unite or die. And with vocal talents that include Arnett, Tatum, Will Ferrell, Liam Neeson, Elizabeth Banks, Nick Offerman, and, of course, Morgan Freeman, this is one you’re going to want to play with from the bottom up.
 
The Lego Movie opens February 7, 2014.
 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all news updates related to the world of geek. And Google+, if that's your thing!
Viewing all 23983 articles
Browse latest View live